Investigators searching for an 11-year-old New Hampshire girl missing for almost a week found a female’s body, but authorities didn’t immediately identify it, a Vermont prosecutor said Monday. (Aug. 1)
Continue reading …Randy Moss is calling it a career after 13 seasons in the NFL as one of the most dynamic and polarizing players the league has ever seen. (Aug. 1)
Continue reading …Randy Moss is calling it a career after 13 seasons in the NFL as one of the most dynamic and polarizing players the league has ever seen. (Aug. 1)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Mitt Romney has been very quiet on the debt ceiling farce even though he’s running for the GOP presidential nomination and many have asked him for comment. Some might say he’s not leading on the issue. Some might say he’s been trying to protect himself from the tea party faction of the GOP since many Conservatives don’t trust him at all, but he finally was forced to weigh in on the issue…since it’s been the #1 news story of the last few weeks. Here’s what he had to finally say. Republican presidential primary front-runner Mitt Romney rejected the debt ceiling deal reached over the weekend, saying it will lead to tax increases and cuts in military spending. “As president, my plan would have produced a budget that was cut, capped and balanced — not one that opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table,” Romney said in a statement. “President Obama’s leadership failure has pushed the economy to the brink at the eleventh hour and 59th minute. While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal,” Romney said. Romney’s statement came after critics — including fellow Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman — assailed the former Massachusetts governor for not weighing in sooner on the debt negotiations. Romney advisers said they were taking a cautious approach to avoid commenting before the contours of a deal became clear. Romney could have spoken out a long time ago and staked a position on it instead of hiding behind a wall of silence all this time. Michele Bachmann, Mrs. “Pray away the Gay” wasn’t afraid be attacked by the GOP gurus like BIll O and Krauthammer to say that she wanted the US to default on its commitments and would never vote to raise the debt ceiling. Even Herman Cain commented on it – even though he flopped around like Mitt usually does. In reality, Romney would never go for the Cut, Cap and Balance lunacy either, but it costs him nothing since that will be defeated and he doesn’t have to vote for it. Here’s a video from C&L’s most excellent archives back in Dec, 2007 from Meet The Pres s when Timmeh put together a mash up of many of Mitt’s flip flops. This is going to be a tough hurdle for him to overcome in the Republican primary although his competition shouldn’t be too difficult to defeat if we were dealing with normal people. MTP transcript: RUSSERT: Let me talk to you about your campaign. This is how it has been described in numerous cartoons, editorials, news articles: “A Changed Man. Many candidates change. Romney seems to have given himself a makeover. Which has prompted more than a few people to ask: Who is this guy?” Some of your opponents passed out these flip-floppers, that Romney flips and flops on the various issues. And it’s become a real issue for you in Iowa. The Des Moines Register asked Republicans who aren’t supporting you what’s the major factor for not supporting Romney? And look at this: Shifting his position on issues like abortion, 51 percent of Republicans say that’s why they haven’t embraced your candidacy. I want to take abortion first. I participated in your debate in 2002 when you ran for governor of Massachusetts. I asked you about that issue, and this was your response. Let’s watch. (Videotape) ROMNEY: My position has been the same throughout my political career, and it goes back to the days of 1970. There was a woman who was running for political office, U.S. Senate. She took a very bold and courageous stand in 1970, and that was in a conservative state. That was that a woman should have the right to make her own choice as to whether or not to have an abortion. Her name was Lenore Romney, she was my mom. I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard. (End videotape) RUSSERT: “Devoted and dedicated” to honoring your word. When you ran for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, you were asked the same question. This was your response. (Videotape) ROMNEY: Many, many years ago I had a dear close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion. It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. Offscreen Voice: Thank you, Mr… ROMNEY: And you will not see me wavering on that. (End videotape) RUSSERT: You–will not see you wavering on that issue. You now have said you support the 2004 Republican Party platform, which says this: “We say the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We” suggest “a human life amendment to the Constitution.” Such amendment would ban abortions all across the country. Why such a dramatic and profound change after pledging never to waiver on a woman’s right to choose?
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Mitt Romney has been very quiet on the debt ceiling farce even though he’s running for the GOP presidential nomination and many have asked him for comment. Some might say he’s not leading on the issue. Some might say he’s been trying to protect himself from the tea party faction of the GOP since many Conservatives don’t trust him at all, but he finally was forced to weigh in on the issue…since it’s been the #1 news story of the last few weeks. Here’s what he had to finally say. Republican presidential primary front-runner Mitt Romney rejected the debt ceiling deal reached over the weekend, saying it will lead to tax increases and cuts in military spending. “As president, my plan would have produced a budget that was cut, capped and balanced — not one that opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table,” Romney said in a statement. “President Obama’s leadership failure has pushed the economy to the brink at the eleventh hour and 59th minute. While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal,” Romney said. Romney’s statement came after critics — including fellow Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman — assailed the former Massachusetts governor for not weighing in sooner on the debt negotiations. Romney advisers said they were taking a cautious approach to avoid commenting before the contours of a deal became clear. Romney could have spoken out a long time ago and staked a position on it instead of hiding behind a wall of silence all this time. Michele Bachmann, Mrs. “Pray away the Gay” wasn’t afraid be attacked by the GOP gurus like BIll O and Krauthammer to say that she wanted the US to default on its commitments and would never vote to raise the debt ceiling. Even Herman Cain commented on it – even though he flopped around like Mitt usually does. In reality, Romney would never go for the Cut, Cap and Balance lunacy either, but it costs him nothing since that will be defeated and he doesn’t have to vote for it. Here’s a video from C&L’s most excellent archives back in Dec, 2007 from Meet The Pres s when Timmeh put together a mash up of many of Mitt’s flip flops. This is going to be a tough hurdle for him to overcome in the Republican primary although his competition shouldn’t be too difficult to defeat if we were dealing with normal people. MTP transcript: RUSSERT: Let me talk to you about your campaign. This is how it has been described in numerous cartoons, editorials, news articles: “A Changed Man. Many candidates change. Romney seems to have given himself a makeover. Which has prompted more than a few people to ask: Who is this guy?” Some of your opponents passed out these flip-floppers, that Romney flips and flops on the various issues. And it’s become a real issue for you in Iowa. The Des Moines Register asked Republicans who aren’t supporting you what’s the major factor for not supporting Romney? And look at this: Shifting his position on issues like abortion, 51 percent of Republicans say that’s why they haven’t embraced your candidacy. I want to take abortion first. I participated in your debate in 2002 when you ran for governor of Massachusetts. I asked you about that issue, and this was your response. Let’s watch. (Videotape) ROMNEY: My position has been the same throughout my political career, and it goes back to the days of 1970. There was a woman who was running for political office, U.S. Senate. She took a very bold and courageous stand in 1970, and that was in a conservative state. That was that a woman should have the right to make her own choice as to whether or not to have an abortion. Her name was Lenore Romney, she was my mom. I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard. (End videotape) RUSSERT: “Devoted and dedicated” to honoring your word. When you ran for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, you were asked the same question. This was your response. (Videotape) ROMNEY: Many, many years ago I had a dear close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion. It is since that time my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. Offscreen Voice: Thank you, Mr… ROMNEY: And you will not see me wavering on that. (End videotape) RUSSERT: You–will not see you wavering on that issue. You now have said you support the 2004 Republican Party platform, which says this: “We say the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We” suggest “a human life amendment to the Constitution.” Such amendment would ban abortions all across the country. Why such a dramatic and profound change after pledging never to waiver on a woman’s right to choose?
Continue reading …Former NBA player Samaki Walker tried to eat eight grams of marijuana before getting arrested in Arizona at a routine traffic stop last Thursday, WTOV9 reports. According to the Las Vegas Journal-Review, about 10 grams of marijuana was seized from Walker’s vehicle, along with some prescription drugs and eight bottles of liquid steroids. The Dallas Mavericks selected Walker with the ninth overall pick in the 1996 draft. He also played for the Los Angeles Lakers, San Antonio Spurs, Washington Wizards, Miami Heat and Indiana Pacers. In 2010, Walker signed with a team in Syria’s top-level D1 league.
Continue reading …Former NBA player Samaki Walker tried to eat eight grams of marijuana before getting arrested in Arizona at a routine traffic stop last Thursday, WTOV9 reports. According to the Las Vegas Journal-Review, about 10 grams of marijuana was seized from Walker’s vehicle, along with some prescription drugs and eight bottles of liquid steroids. The Dallas Mavericks selected Walker with the ninth overall pick in the 1996 draft. He also played for the Los Angeles Lakers, San Antonio Spurs, Washington Wizards, Miami Heat and Indiana Pacers. In 2010, Walker signed with a team in Syria’s top-level D1 league.
Continue reading …As far as celebrity splits go, Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli’s seems pretty easy. At least the “Cowboys & Aliens” actress and the prince, married for eight years, don’t have any kids. But that might have been the problem; childfree couples divorce more often than couples who have at least one child, according to researchers, despite numerous studies that indicate marital happiness plummets in the first year or two after the birth of a child and sometimes never quite recoups. Among the research author Po Bronson gathered for his various books, he notes the work done by sociologist Paul H. Jacobson as proof: “For couples without children, the divorce rate in 1948 was 15.3 per 1,000. Where one child was present, the estimate rate was 11.6 per 1,000. The figure thus continues to decrease, and in families with four or more children, it was 4.6. Altogether, the rate for couples with children was 8.8 per 1,000. In other words, the rate for childless couples was almost double the rate for families with children.” OK, but Jacobson’s study was published in 1950; is it still true today? Yes, according to journalist Anneli Rufus, whose number crunching discovered that of the divorced couples in the United States, 66 percent are childless compared with 40 percent who have kids. Why? Evidently, the “absence of children leads to loneliness and weariness.” I don’t know about that; I know of a lot of parents who are not only lonely in their marriage but extremely weary because of their kids. “I’ve been tracking the childfree for over 10 years now, and see many, many happily married childfree couples out there,” says Laura Carroll, author of “Families of Two: Interviews With Happily Married Couples Without Children by Choice” who blogs at La Vie Childfree. Carroll is trying to revive the idea of Non-Parents Day, celebrated Aug. 1, so named in 1972 by the National Organization for Non-Parents, which then became the National Alliance for Optional Parenthood. It’s understandable that kidfree couples would be happy — they have more time, energy and money to spend on their careers, friends, each other and themselves. And, according to recent surveys, one for No Kidding!, an international social group for people without children, and one by Laura S. Scott, author of “Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice,” couples often decide not to have kids because they want to put their relationship first — having kids can get in the way. So if they’re so happy, why do more kidfree couples end up splitting? “People assume children are the glue that holds a marriage together, which really isn’t true. Kids are huge stressors,” says Scott, head of the Childless by Choice Project whose documentary on childfree couples was just released. “Despite that, there is a strong motive to stay together. The childfree don’t have that motive so there’s no reason to stay together if it’s not working.” That’s why for Wilde, who says her relationship became too much work and “I don’t think love should be work,” it wasn’t too hard to kiss her prince goodbye. Says Lori Buckley, a certified sex therapist, “A lot of couples come into my office and the only reason they are working on the relationship is because of the children.” If you don’t have kids, divorce is often easier, legally and financially if not necessarily emotionally. All you have to focus on is who gets what of the stuff and who gets how much of the assets; no custody issues, no family court, no Parental Alienation Syndrome. Some states even make it almost a breeze; in Tennessee, couples with kids have to meet higher standards to be able to divorce than those without kids. In Virginia, couples with children face a mandatory waiting period of about a year before they can get a divorce; kidfree couples often have to wait about six months. But there’s a difference between couples who are childfree by choice and those who are childless because they can’t have kids, and the latter make up the bulk of the childfree. “Not all the childfree are intentionally childfree couples,” Scott discovered in her research after talking to hundreds of couples. “A good chunk are postponers, those who delay parenthood.” Sometimes couples delay to the point that fertility problems arise. “Then the question of ”When should we have kids?’ morphs into ‘Should we have kids?” Scott says, forcing couples to explore other ways to have a baby, such as adoption, surrogates or in vitro fertilization (IVF). That, she says, can be extremely stressful and can lead to a fracture that a couple can’t get past. In fact, many infertility specialists recommend marital counseling. “If one partner desperately wants to try to have a child and one partner might not put as high a priority on it, that could be a deal breaker,” she says. Often a couple hasn’t discussed what point they stop trying — how much money, how much time, how many procedures. Many women often feel like failures and feel less close to their partners; for many men, the fertility process can turn sex into anything other than pleasure. “I hear from men who say, ‘This isn’t fun anymore. I feel like I’m sperm on demand,’” Scott says. If couples can’t agree, they’re more likely to split. And there may be more childfree couples ahead; fewer people believe that kids are “very important” to a successful marriage, according to a 2007 survey by the Pew Research Center. About 65 percent of us believed they were back in 1990, but just 41 percent of us believe that now. About 7 percent of Millennials — those born in or after 1982 — say they don’t want kids and 19 percent aren’t sure. But if that 19 percent waits too long, they may be the next crop of infertile, and perhaps divorced, couples. “A lot of people don’t have the kid conversation before they get married. They just assume parenthood,” Scott says. So unless you want to celebrate Non-Parents Day because you truly don’t want to be a parent, “have that conversation before you commit to someone.” she advises.
Continue reading …As far as celebrity splits go, Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli’s seems pretty easy. At least the “Cowboys & Aliens” actress and the prince, married for eight years, don’t have any kids. But that might have been the problem; childfree couples divorce more often than couples who have at least one child, according to researchers, despite numerous studies that indicate marital happiness plummets in the first year or two after the birth of a child and sometimes never quite recoups. Among the research author Po Bronson gathered for his various books, he notes the work done by sociologist Paul H. Jacobson as proof: “For couples without children, the divorce rate in 1948 was 15.3 per 1,000. Where one child was present, the estimate rate was 11.6 per 1,000. The figure thus continues to decrease, and in families with four or more children, it was 4.6. Altogether, the rate for couples with children was 8.8 per 1,000. In other words, the rate for childless couples was almost double the rate for families with children.” OK, but Jacobson’s study was published in 1950; is it still true today? Yes, according to journalist Anneli Rufus, whose number crunching discovered that of the divorced couples in the United States, 66 percent are childless compared with 40 percent who have kids. Why? Evidently, the “absence of children leads to loneliness and weariness.” I don’t know about that; I know of a lot of parents who are not only lonely in their marriage but extremely weary because of their kids. “I’ve been tracking the childfree for over 10 years now, and see many, many happily married childfree couples out there,” says Laura Carroll, author of “Families of Two: Interviews With Happily Married Couples Without Children by Choice” who blogs at La Vie Childfree. Carroll is trying to revive the idea of Non-Parents Day, celebrated Aug. 1, so named in 1972 by the National Organization for Non-Parents, which then became the National Alliance for Optional Parenthood. It’s understandable that kidfree couples would be happy — they have more time, energy and money to spend on their careers, friends, each other and themselves. And, according to recent surveys, one for No Kidding!, an international social group for people without children, and one by Laura S. Scott, author of “Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice,” couples often decide not to have kids because they want to put their relationship first — having kids can get in the way. So if they’re so happy, why do more kidfree couples end up splitting? “People assume children are the glue that holds a marriage together, which really isn’t true. Kids are huge stressors,” says Scott, head of the Childless by Choice Project whose documentary on childfree couples was just released. “Despite that, there is a strong motive to stay together. The childfree don’t have that motive so there’s no reason to stay together if it’s not working.” That’s why for Wilde, who says her relationship became too much work and “I don’t think love should be work,” it wasn’t too hard to kiss her prince goodbye. Says Lori Buckley, a certified sex therapist, “A lot of couples come into my office and the only reason they are working on the relationship is because of the children.” If you don’t have kids, divorce is often easier, legally and financially if not necessarily emotionally. All you have to focus on is who gets what of the stuff and who gets how much of the assets; no custody issues, no family court, no Parental Alienation Syndrome. Some states even make it almost a breeze; in Tennessee, couples with kids have to meet higher standards to be able to divorce than those without kids. In Virginia, couples with children face a mandatory waiting period of about a year before they can get a divorce; kidfree couples often have to wait about six months. But there’s a difference between couples who are childfree by choice and those who are childless because they can’t have kids, and the latter make up the bulk of the childfree. “Not all the childfree are intentionally childfree couples,” Scott discovered in her research after talking to hundreds of couples. “A good chunk are postponers, those who delay parenthood.” Sometimes couples delay to the point that fertility problems arise. “Then the question of ”When should we have kids?’ morphs into ‘Should we have kids?” Scott says, forcing couples to explore other ways to have a baby, such as adoption, surrogates or in vitro fertilization (IVF). That, she says, can be extremely stressful and can lead to a fracture that a couple can’t get past. In fact, many infertility specialists recommend marital counseling. “If one partner desperately wants to try to have a child and one partner might not put as high a priority on it, that could be a deal breaker,” she says. Often a couple hasn’t discussed what point they stop trying — how much money, how much time, how many procedures. Many women often feel like failures and feel less close to their partners; for many men, the fertility process can turn sex into anything other than pleasure. “I hear from men who say, ‘This isn’t fun anymore. I feel like I’m sperm on demand,’” Scott says. If couples can’t agree, they’re more likely to split. And there may be more childfree couples ahead; fewer people believe that kids are “very important” to a successful marriage, according to a 2007 survey by the Pew Research Center. About 65 percent of us believed they were back in 1990, but just 41 percent of us believe that now. About 7 percent of Millennials — those born in or after 1982 — say they don’t want kids and 19 percent aren’t sure. But if that 19 percent waits too long, they may be the next crop of infertile, and perhaps divorced, couples. “A lot of people don’t have the kid conversation before they get married. They just assume parenthood,” Scott says. So unless you want to celebrate Non-Parents Day because you truly don’t want to be a parent, “have that conversation before you commit to someone.” she advises.
Continue reading …For the past month, as the debt talks slogged on in Washington, the so-called mainstream media unleashed increasingly hysterical attacks on the Tea Party and anti-tax hike conservatives — epitomizing the liberal elite’s supreme annoyance at the push to curb federal spending and contain the size of government. The media’s disdainful language has ranged from the merely condescending (wondering whether the Tea Partiers in Congress actually knew how things worked, or referring to them as children), to outright hostile (likening the Tea Party to al Qaeda or other terrorist groups). Here are some of the choicer examples MRC has collected over the past 30 days: Just a Bunch of Ignorant Boobs
Continue reading …