Home » Archives by category » News (Page 2345)

Nasdaq%3aaapl

No Comment
Nasdaq%3aaapl

What’s In The News: August 3, 2011 Hewlett-Packard Beats Apple In Consumer Tech Support What’s In The News: August 2, 2011 WWMarketNews says: Stock update: Apple Inc Monthly & Year to Date Performance Remained Green – NASDAQ : AAPL http://bit.ly/pdrzsS

Continue reading …
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …

Moammar Gadhafi’s youngest son, Khamis, was among the dozens of loyalist troops killed in a NATO air strike on the city of Zliten last night, a Libyan rebel spokesman told the AFP today, citing spies planted in Gadhafi’s ranks and intercepted radio chatter. NATO confirmed only that it had hit…

Continue reading …
Friday Flicks: Should We Beat Our Chest for ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’?

Grab some popcorn! NewsFeed’s Glen Levy brings you the movies you should check out (or avoid) this weekend. Rise of the Planet of the Apes Tagline: Evolution Becomes Revolution It seems like yesterday that Tim Burton was remaking Planet of the Apes, but it’s actually been 10 years since he set to work on the

Continue reading …
Police officers convicted over Katrina bridge shootings

Five current and former police officers guilty of human rights violations and trying to cover-up the New Orleans shootings Richard Adams in Washington Five New Orleans police officers have been convicted for their complicity in a series of murders and shootings of residents trying to escape the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. A jury found the five men guilty of covering up the killing of two people – including a mentally disabled man – and the wounding of four others in an elaborate plot that involved creating fake witnesses, falsifying police reports and statements, and planting a gun as evidence. While the men escaped charges of murder, the jury in New Orleans also found Robert Faulcon, Robert Gisevius, Kenneth Bowen and Anthony Villavaso guilty of civil rights violations, while the fifth, Arthur Kaufman – a sergeant who investigated the shootings – was also guilty of taking part in the cover-up. “This was a critical verdict. I cannot overstate the importance of this verdict. The power, the message it sends to the community, the healing power it has,” Jim Letten, the prosecuting US Attorney, said after the verdict was announced. The case is the most high profile of four major federal cases over the use of force by New Orleans police, and is likely to become a landmark civil rights decision. The mother of 17-year-old James Brissette, who was killed on the bridge, welcomed the verdict after “a long, hard six years.” But she questioned why the officers were not guilty of murder. “How are you able to empty a shotgun in the person and it’s not murder?” Sherrel Johnson said to the Associated Press. The shootings took place on the Danziger Bridge over the city’s Industrial Canal on 4 September 2005, as many residents tried to find food and shelter in the chaos only five days after the Category Five hurricane had battered the city and destroyed its system of levees, flooding the inner city streets. The only one of the accused to testify, former police officer Robert Faulcon, told the court he was “paralysed with fear” when he shot and killed an unarmed 40-year-old mentally disabled man, Ronald Madison, in the back with a shotgun from his patrol car. But Faulcon claimed that he believed Madison was armed. Prosecutors said Kaufman later produced a gun he owned and claimed it had been found at the scene, belonging to Madison’s brother, and invented two nonexistent witnesses to the shootings. Sergeant Kenneth Bowen was also charged with civil rights violations for kicking and beating Madison after he had already been wounded by Faulcon. Bowen, Gisevius, Faulcon and Villavaso are all charged with civil rights violations for the shooting of Brissette, the teenager killed on the eastern side of the bridge, as well as for injuring members of another family. Federal investigators reopened the investigation in 2008, which resulted in a series of guilty pleas by other New Orleans police officers involved in what was a systematic cover-up that began as soon as the shooting had stopped. The shootings were prompted by a radio call from an officer nearby, who reported that he was being fired on. Lawyers for the police officers said the men had been under fire, but no guns allegedly belonging to civilians were ever recovered from the scene. Four people were injured in the shootings on the eastern side of Danziger Bridge: Susan Bartholomew, then 38 years old, and her 44-year-old husband, Leonard Bartholomew. Their teenage daughter, Lesha Bartholomew, was injured, as was their nephew, Jose Holmes. United States Gun crime Hurricane Katrina Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …