The timing of this CNSNews report published early Friday about a definitive statement made by President Obama seems particularly eerie given the fact that Standard & Poor’s downgraded the U.S’. credit rating Friday evening for the first time in history . The rather foreboding report delved into a flashback of Obama circa 2009, in which he stated that his presidency would be a “ one-term proposition… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 06/08/2011 03:57 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …Leona Lewis – Better In Time Live Sunrise 2008 A Christmas Tale [2008] Official Trailer Fat B!tch Song *Fail* grignina says: RT @ rtmillerstl : I like this app mentioned in Time : Check out News360, a great news aggregator for Android Tablets: http://n360.to/mIB6OR (via @ news360app )
Continue reading …The riot that tore through parts of north London’s deprived Tottenham neighborhood has cast a pall over Britain’s capital, echoing an earlier era of racial unrest, while spreading malaise through a city preparing to host the Olympic Games. (Aug. 7)
Continue reading …With the United States having run out of scorpion anti-venom nearly 10 years ago, the FDA has just approved a Mexican-made treatment for scorpion stings, reports NPR . Although there are about 250 severe scorpion stings a year in the United States—mainly in the “Venom Belt” in the southwest—US…
Continue reading …Standard & Poor’s downgrade of America’s credit rating represents a new factor in America’s creditworthiness—”political insanity,” writes Edmund Andrews in the National Journal . Indeed, Andrews notes that S&P explicitly cited politics in its downgrade: “The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking…
Continue reading …This is a fine example of “Chinese bluegrass” performed by Mei Han’s Red Chamber 紅庭 with John Reischman and the Jaybirds. The instruments include an iluqin, mandolin, bass, pipa, guitar, sanxian, banjo, and ruan. The song is “Katy Hill.” (via @mgorbis!)… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Boing Boing Discovery Date : 24/02/2009 21:26 Number of articles : 10
Continue reading …African Union peacekeepers and soldiers hold famine-hit capital, but insurgents insist withdrawal is just a change in tactics Somali government soldiers and African Union (AU) peacekeepers have moved tentatively to secure former rebel-held areas in Mogadishu, a day after al-Shabaab insurgents announced a retreat from the city. Supported by armoured vehicles and tanks, the troops encountered sporadic resistance, and at least once soldier was killed in a gun battle. But reports from Mogadishu suggested that the vast majority of the Islamist fighters had left the city – or gone underground. The retreat by the rebels, who still control most of famine-struck southern Somalia, took many people by surprise. An al-Shabaab spokesman, Sheikh Ali Mohamed Rage, told local radio on Saturday that the move was “a change in tactics” . But analysts have suggested it is a sign of the increased weakness and divisions in the Islamist ranks that stem from rebels’ handling of the famine gripping the country, as well as a shortage of cash. Some hardline leaders have tried to play down the humanitarian crisis in Somalia and refused to admit lifesaving aid organisations, including the World Food Programme. Tens of thousands of Somalis have died this year of hunger-related causes, according to the UN, and 3.7 million people need urgent food aid. Most are in rebel-held areas. The transitional federal government, which has little credibility among Somalis and little to celebrate in recent years, called the insurgents’ withdrawal “a tremendous step forward”. The rebels have controlled most of Mogadishu for several years after emerging from the ashes of a moderate Islamist group that was destroyed by the invading Ethiopian army in late 2006. Following the Ethiopian pullout two years later, only 9,000 AU peacekeepers prevented al-Shabaab from taking over the entire capital – and perhaps the country. The retreat from Mogadishu followed a strong AU offensive over the past fortnight that saw the rebels lose significant ground, including control of Bakara market, a key source of “tax” revenue. But while it is a boost for the government, it does not equal victory over the rebels. The al-Shabaab insurgents proved extremely adept at guerilla warfare during the Ethiopian occupation, and have carried out countless roadside bomb attacks, suicide missions and assassinations. The rebel leaders may have decided to return to this style of conflict, rather than trying to hold ground against the better-armed peacekeepers. Somalia’s prime minister, Abdiweli Mohamed Ali, said the government’s priority was to secure areas abandoned by the rebels in Mogadishu, and assess the needs of the population. Parts of the capital hosting large numbers of people who fled hunger in the countryside were declared famine zones last week. Four other areas in southern Somalia – two of them entire regions – are also experiencing famine conditions, the UN says. Ali said the al-Shabaab pullout would give the international community “the necessary confidence and assurance” to increase the aid effort in Mogadishu. But humanitarian workers are likely to be cautious owing to the weakness of the government as well as the insurgents’ brutally effective track record. The rebel cause has attracted global jihadists who were invited in by some of the top al-Shabaab leaders who hail from the breakaway northern region of Somaliland, rather than southern Somalia where the group is based. It is these al-Qaida-linked leaders that have opposed the international aid effort. But another section of al-Shabaab’s leadership is from southern Somalia, and is much closer to the local people. The rift between the two groups is believed to have widened as the drought turned into a famine. Somalia African Union Famine Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Campaigners vow ‘more pressure and more people’ after 300,000-strong demonstration across country Activists behind spiralling protests in Israel plan to build on one of the biggest marches ever seen in the country by piling on “more pressure, more people, more tents and more protests” culminating in a million-strong march in 50 cities next month. An estimated 300,000 people took to the streets on Saturday to press their demands for social justice and lower living costs in the largest demonstrations over social issues ever seen in the country. Despite scepticism that turnout could surpass previous events, almost twice as many people joined marches in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other towns and cities. Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, was forced to respond to the spiralling protests with the establishment of a committee to “listen to the distress” and recommend action. The protests, which began with a handful of tents erected in Tel Aviv, have unleashed a national fury at the government’s failure to respond to the needs and complaints of middle-income Israelis. Tent cities have mushroomed in more than 40 locations across the country as well as daily demonstrations and roadblocks over the cost of housing, childcare, fuel, food and electricity. Despite Israel’s relatively healthy economic growth and low unemployment, wage disparities are big, wealth and corporate power are highly concentrated, food prices have increased almost 13% since 2005 and many people spend 50% of their incomes on rent or mortgages. Up to 250,000 people marched through Tel Aviv to Israel’s military headquarters on Saturday, causing major traffic diversions until the early hours. One sign, in Hebrew and Arabic, read “Egypt is here”. In Jerusalem, up to 30,000 people marched to Netanyahu’s residence, chanting the rallying cry of the past three weeks: “The people demand social justice.” Smaller protests were also held in Kiryat Shmona, Modi’in, Hod HaSharon, Ashkelon, Eilat and Dimona, according to media reports. Stav Shaffir, 26, one of the original tent protesters in Tel Aviv, told the Guardian that “more pressure, more people, more tents and more protests” would follow. “Right now we’re coming together to think about our next steps. There will be more protests – definitely more protests.” A loose alliance of activists behind the protests called for a million-strong march on 3 September. The committee set up by Netanyahu was ordered to report within a month. “It is impossible to ignore the voices coming from the public,” the prime minister said in a lengthy statement. Israel’s economy was strong, but “we know that we must make the internal corrections … social corrections, with sensitivity”. He added: “We will listen to everyone. We will speak with everyone.” However, Netanyahu has so far refused to meet a delegation from the tent protesters. “This is definitely not enough,” said Shaffir. “We have been on the street for almost a month, and there has been no contact at all from Netanyahu. The public thinks the government is out of touch with the people, and people are angry and want to see change.”Shimon Peres, Israel’s president, said the protests were a “testament to the nation’s maturity”. In contrast, the extreme right foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, said that cafes in Tel Aviv were “packed to capacity” adding that there was no reason “to be depressed”. The social protests have become the most pressing issue for the Israeli government, with the potential, according to some commentators, to topple Netanyahu’s coalition. Opinion polls have put public support for the protests at around 90%. Protest leaders have insisted that bringing the government down is not their aim. The organisers have striven to keep the movement as inclusive as possible, incorporating left and right, secular and religious, Jews and Arabs. They have avoided publicly making connections between the amount spent on settlements and the military for fear of being branded anti-occupation activists. “It is certainly one of the largest street protests we have experienced in Israel,” said Tamar Hermann, of the Israel Democracy Institute. “But what really makes it different is its heterogeneous nature. Normally protest is homogeneous. Diversity is as important as size.” She said Israel’s economic health was “one of the reasons people feel able to protest. When you are at rock bottom you invest everything in survival. People here are not devastated but discontented.” Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli parliament, said the protests would define Israeli society as “a collective based either on social solidarity or national territorialism”. Indications that the former was outgunning the latter were “why all the settlers are so upset”, he added. Some observers believe Netanyahu will try to ride out the protests until September, when the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations is likely to dominate the political agenda. The Palestinians, they say, are a familiar foe that Netanyahu feels he can outmanoeuvre whereas the Israeli social justice protesters are an unknown force. Analogies drawn between the Arab spring and the Israeli summer were not completely misplaced, according to Hermann. “Israelis generally want to disassociate themselves from the Middle East, culturally, politically and economically. But obviously they have watched Tahrir Square as well as events in Spain and Athens. “Protest is a phenomenon which often spills over national borders. This fits into a new wave of street protests that we are now seeing all over the world, including the Middle East.” Palestinian demands As Israelis take to the streets to demand social justice, Palestinians are also gearing up to protest next month over their demands for recognition of a Palestinian state by the United Nations. President Mahmoud Abbas has urged “popular resistance” as well as diplomatic moves. “In this coming period, we want mass action, organised and co-ordinated in every place,” he said last month. “This is a chance to raise our voices in front of the world and say we want our rights.” Marwan Barghouti, an iconic figure for Palestinians who is serving five life sentences in an Israeli jail, also called for mass action. “I call on our people in the homeland and in the diaspora to go out in a peaceful, million-man march during the week of voting in the United Nations in September,” he said. Palestinian leaders, backed by the Arab League, intend to ask the UN general assembly to back a Palestinian state when it meets in September. However, full recognition requires the backing of the UN security council, which the US has vowed to veto. The Israeli protests are being given scant attention in the Palestinian media. But, said Mustafa Barghouti, a member of the Palestinian parliament, “we feel sympathetic because they are also demanding social rights. At the same time we hope that they will see that one of the reasons for this crisis is the Israeli occupation policy and military spending. “We hope that this social movement becomes a political movement which demands peace and end to occupation.” Harriet Sherwood Israel Middle East Protest Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Wow, it’s like they have something to hide. .. Yesterday, at a conference in New Orleans, two ThinkProgress reporters were attacked by security guards for no apparent reason. Reporters Scott Keyes and Lee Fang were at the Marriott Hotel for the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) annual meeting, an event that brings together state lawmakers with corporate lobbyists to draft “model” legislation. While [Keyes and Fang] stood by the second floor lobby of the conference hotel, security guards surrounded [them], demanding that [they] leave. As we were leaving, [the guards] approached [Keyes and Fang], violently pushed [them] and twisted [their] arms. A guard approached Fang from behind, tackling him and later bending his arm to take his camera. Keyes, faced similar treatment: two security guards roughed him up on the escalator, taking his video camera, and cutting Keyes’ hand as he attempted to leave the premises. As Keyes asked why he was being forced to leave, he was shoved from the back. Asked why they were being so belligerent, the security guards said they were acting on instructions from ALEC. I tend to stay away from shadow government conspiracy theories, but this truly is a shadow organization –accountable to no one and with no need or desire for transparency–that is writing legislation that affects all of us throughout the country. And now, they’re roughing up reporters who get too close? New world order, indeed.
Continue reading …ABC's Cokie Roberts said something on national television Sunday that made her colleague George Will shake his head on camera. During a “This Week” discussion about the recent credit rating downgrade by Standard and Poor's Roberts said, 'The problem that we have here is the Constitution of the United States of America which actually does require people to come together from different perspectives” (video follows with transcript and commentary): COKIE ROBERTS: This group of people in New York [Standard and Poor’s] is actually talking about more government rather than less government, Congressman. In fact, the reason they like France and Great Britain is because they’re parliamentary systems where the majority gets what it wants no matter what. And the problem that we have here is the Constitution of the United States of America which actually does require people to come together from different perspectives whether it's divided government or not. We have divided branches of government under any circumstance. Wow! In June, Time magazine's managing editor Richard Stengel wrote a cover story asking, “Does the Constitution Still Matter,” and now Roberts goes on national television blaming our credit rating downgrade on America's most sacred document. Somehow I doubt Roberts would be bemoaning the majority's inability to ram through any legislation it wanted if the Republicans controlled the White House as well as both chambers of Congress. Liberals like her only decry divided government when they're in control. But what shouldn't have missed the eyes of viewers was George Will shaking his head in the foreground as Roberts made this absurd comment. Fans of his surely know how he believes one of America's greatest strengths is indeed divided government. As it pertains to the current debt issue, something Will wrote in September 2008 was amazingly prescient: Divided government compels compromises that curb each party's excesses, especially both parties' proclivities for excessive spending when unconstrained by an institution controlled by the other party. William Niskanen , chairman of the libertarian Cato Institute, notes that in the past 50 years, “government spending has increased an average of only 1.73 percent annually during periods of divided government. This number more than triples, to 5.26 percent, for periods of unified government.” That bears repeating: “[I]n the past 50 years, 'government spending has increased an average of only 1.73 percent annually during periods of divided government. This number more than triples, to 5.26 percent, for periods of unified government.'” As such, if your real goal is reduced spending, the divided government Roberts so despises is actually the answer. It's certainly not surprising that she doesn't know this and Will does.
Continue reading …