Are hot dogs a political issue? Surprisingly so. On Monday July 25, my non-profit organization, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, erected a billboard outside the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The picture was stark — a cigarette pack emblazoned with a skull and crossbones. But sticking out of the pack were not cigarettes — instead there were hot dogs. The message said “WARNING: Hot dogs can wreck your health.” The issue is cancer. Every year, about 143,000 Americans are diagnosed with colorectal cancer and more than 50,000 die of the disease. About half of all cases are already incurable when found. The U.S. Government and other entities have poured millions of dollars into the search for the cause. But one of the causes they found turned out to be too hot for the government to handle. It’s the ordinary hot dog. At least 58 scientific studies have looked at the issue, and the jury has rendered its verdict, which is now beyond reasonable doubt. The more hot dogs people eat, the higher their risk of colorectal cancer. And it’s not just hot dogs. Any sort of processed meat — bacon, sausage, ham, deli slices — is in this group. And here are the numbers: Every 50 grams of processed meat you eat on a daily basis (that’s about one hot dog) increases your risk of colorectal cancer by 21 percent. And just as there is no safe level of smoking, no amount of hot dogs, bacon, sausage, ham or other processed meats comes out clean in scientific studies. The problem goes beyond colorectal cancer. An NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study found a 10 percent increased risk of prostate cancer for every 10 grams of increased intake of processed meats. Other studies have linked these same products to leukemia and ovarian cancer. Exactly how processed meats do their dirty work is not clear; it could be their nitrites, saturated fat or other ingredients. But here’s where politics come in: Even though much of this research was paid for by the U.S. government, the government also subsidizes meat. It supports feed grains to fatten cows and pigs, buys up meats for the school lunch program and helps the meat industry in countless other ways. So I think that the last thing the government wants to do is to publicize the cancer risk of one of its favorite products. I believe that this is why there are no government billboards, radio ads or television spots to warn anyone about this easily preventable cause. At a ballgame, if you’re thinking about buying your daughter a hot dog, there are no notices, no warning labels on the food product, no nothing. Meat industry lobbyists have made sure that your government won’t breathe a word. The fact is, hot dogs are not fun, cute or “All-American.” If you are not convinced, just ask to see how one is made. When good research finds a potentially fatal risk to Americans — one as close as our refrigerators and as dear to us as our children — the government needs to let Americans know. And when it does not, we will.
Continue reading …Newsweek editor Tina Brown defended her magazine's controversial cover portraying Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) as the “Queen of Rage” on the August 10 edition of MSNBC's “Morning Joe,” offering no apology since the three-term congresswoman could become America's first “crazy” president. “Some people look at this picture and think, you know, Michele Bachmann looks crazy,” remarked Brown. “Some people look at it and think it's the next President of the United States. The fact that these two things are no longer mutually exclusive is what, I think, makes it pretty compelling.” [Video follows page break] Explaining her decision to use an unflattering photo of Bachmann that even the left-wing National Organization for Women (NOW) called sexist , Brown claimed the other pictures were “offensive” and “strange.” “You know, there was one picture of her praying, which frankly we rejected because we thought that seemed somehow some kind of a commentary on her religiosity that maybe would be offensive,” contended Brown, adding, “There was another picture of her sitting kind of sideways and I thought she looked extremely strange.” MSNBC contributor Mike Barnicle came to Brown's defense, insisting Newsweek's photo depicted Bachmann accurately: “It looks like her. It looks like her. It looks like her. I've seen her in person. I've seen her up close in person. It looks like her.” As Brown feigned sympathy for Bachmann, Joe Scarborough could hardly contain his laughter: “I got a question: who's the photographer? Because I don't ever want him to be in the same room with me.” When co-host Willie Geist wondered whether the infamous photo was snapped during a light check, Brown dismissed the question as “absolute nonsense.” A transcript of the relevant portions of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Morning Joe August 10, 2011 7:02 a.m. Eastern MIKA BRZEZINSKI: And joining the table, editor-in-chief of Newsweek magazine and the Daily Beast, Tina Brown. Tina! Alright Tina! We're not going to play this game. (Crosstalk) TINA BROWN, Newsweek editor: I'm not playing any game. No games for me. No games for me. (Crosstalk) BRZEZINSKI: You are one of the savviest people I've seen in the media industry and this cover just proves it. It's perfect. JOE SCARBOROUGH: It's a cheap shot. Come on. She looks cross-eyed, it's a light check. Come on. (Crosstalk) BROWN: No listen, I mean. Some people look at this picture and think, you know, Michele Bachmann looks crazy. Some people look at it and think it's the next President of the United States. The fact that these two things are no longer mutually exclusive is what, I think, makes it pretty compelling. BRZEZINSKI: The Queen of Rage? BROWN: Absolutely. Listen, this came out of a week when a New York Times columnist called the Tea Party terrorists and then apologized the next week. This is a very polarized moment in politics and this cover, to us, absolutely captured that moment. SCARBOROUGH: What her looking cross-eyed to the light check? Capture this moment? BROWN: Not cross-eyed. Listen she has – the intensity in her eyes is in all the photographs of her, you know. This is the thing that's connecting with people. We have people in the crowd saying, you know, something about her tells me I should follow her And there is something about Michele Bachmann with the eyes looking out. She has a very very, this very kind of intense demeanor. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …2010 NFL Preseason Schedule: Week 4 Picks Raiders vs 49ers NFL Preseason Schedule 2010 SharonErickson1 says: So excited for Preseason ! Go Cards!”@ azcardsbuzztap : Cardinals Gab NFL Preseason Schedule for Week One http://t.co/wpQjkeB “
Continue reading …Dirt Bike Games Free download dirt bike games A Truck Games Made For The Adults EGeac says: Moto X Mayhem Highscore Contest Challenge Winners Announced — Official … http://goo.gl/fb/OsbZa #Trends
Continue reading …DaysTalk Video Recap Troy Killed Arianna (Days of our Lives) April 19, 2011 Days of Our Lives SPOILERS (New!), Day Ahead, Updates, and more! DaysTalk Recap March 22, 2011 (Days of our Lives) Maggie and Victor an Official Couple FLVTubeTweets says: Days Of Our Lives Spoilers : #DaysOfOurLivesSpoilers # Days # Of # Our # Lives # Spoilers http://tinyurl.com/3skrrv5 #google #youtube
Continue reading …A dad who created a blog called “Psycho Ex Wife” to document his bitter divorce and custody battle is balking at a court order to take down the site or risk losing joint custody of his two sons. Anthony Morelli—whose descriptions of his ex-wife on the blog include “Jabba…
Continue reading …Welcome to Engadget’s Back to School guide ! We know that this time of year can be pretty annoying and stressful for everyone, so we’re here to help out with the heartbreaking process of gadget buying for the school-aged crowd. Today, we’re settling down in front of a few of our favorite HDTVs, but you can head to the Back to School hub to see the rest of the product guides as they’re added throughout the month. Be sure to keep checking back — at the end of the series we’ll be giving away a ton of the gear featured in our guides — and hit up the hub page right here ! The bad news is that unless you chose your major very carefully, your assignments will not often include a directive to plop down in front of the TV for any large amount of time. The good news, however, is that you’ll probably end up doing plenty of that anyway, so whether you’re zoning out to some reality TV drama, enjoying an enlightening documentary, or playing video games in the dorm, you’ll want a nice set to watch on. Jump past the break for our recommendations, and another opportunity to enter our back to school giveaway. Simply leave a comment below to be entered to win , and head over to our giveaway page for more details. Continue reading Engadget’s back to school guide 2011: televisions Engadget’s back to school guide 2011: televisions originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Type: Photography Title: Panasonic BL-C210A Internet Security Camera See all customer reviews Product Description: Panasonic BL-C210A Internet Security Camera Features: Image Sensor: 1/4″ CMOS, 320,000 pixel 3x Digital Zoom Up to 30 Frames per second Max. Video Resolution: 640 x 480 (VGA) 82?pan, 42?tilt F2.8 Lens brightness See the details
Continue reading …Although Sesame Street’s creators have never said that the two characters are gay, viewers have long speculated that roommates Bert and Ernie are more than just friends. Perhaps the petition, started by Illinois resident Lair Scott, was prompted by the changing tide in the U.S.: In June, New York became the sixth — and largest
Continue reading …