Interesting op-ed in the NYTimes pointing out the strong and growing disapproval for the tea party – and why. David E. Campbell, an associate professor of political science at Notre Dame, and Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, say most Americans oppose the tea party’s favored mixing of politics and religion: Beginning in 2006 we interviewed a representative sample of 3,000 Americans as part of our continuing research into national political attitudes, and we returned to interview many of the same people again this summer. As a result, we can look at what people told us, long before there was a Tea Party, to predict who would become a Tea Party supporter five years later. We can also account for multiple influences simultaneously — isolating the impact of one factor while holding others constant. Our analysis casts doubt on the Tea Party’s “origin story.” Early on, Tea Partiers were often described as nonpartisan political neophytes . Actually, the Tea Party’s supporters today were highly partisan Republicans long before the Tea Party was born, and were more likely than others to have contacted government officials. In fact, past Republican affiliation is the single strongest predictor of Tea Party support today. What’s more, contrary to some accounts, the Tea Party is not a creature of the Great Recession. Many Americans have suffered in the last four years, but they are no more likely than anyone else to support the Tea Party. And while the public image of the Tea Party focuses on a desire to shrink government, concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters. So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do. More important, they were disproportionately social conservatives in 2006 — opposing abortion, for example — and still are today. Next to being a Republican, the strongest predictor of being a Tea Party supporter today was a desire, back in 2006, to see religion play a prominent role in politics. And Tea Partiers continue to hold these views: they seek “deeply religious” elected officials, approve of religious leaders’ engaging in politics and want religion brought into political debates . The Tea Party’s generals may say their overriding concern is a smaller government, but not their rank and file, who are more concerned about putting God in government. This inclination among the Tea Party faithful to mix religion and politics explains their support for Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. Their appeal to Tea Partiers lies less in what they say about the budget or taxes, and more in their overt use of religious language and imagery, including Mrs. Bachmann’s lengthy prayers at campaign stops and Mr. Perry’s prayer rally in Houston. Yet it is precisely this infusion of religion into politics that most Americans increasingly oppose. While over the last five years Americans have become slightly more conservative economically, they have swung even further in opposition to mingling religion and politics . It thus makes sense that the Tea Party ranks alongside the Christian Right in unpopularity. On everything but the size of government, Tea Party supporters are increasingly out of step with most Americans, even many Republicans. Indeed, at the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, today’s Tea Party parallels the anti-Vietnam War movement which rallied behind George S. McGovern in 1972. The McGovernite activists brought energy, but also stridency, to the Democratic Party — repelling moderate voters and damaging the Democratic brand for a generation. By embracing the Tea Party, Republicans risk repeating history . Sounds like this is the point Democrats should hit over and over again: That this nation was founded on religious freedom (and now includes the freedom not to worship) and we don’t need elected officials interfering with that. Once we breach the wall separating church and state, we’re no longer America.
Continue reading …Authorities in Tampa say they busted up a teen’s Columbine-level plot to attack his former high school, reports the St. Petersburg Times . Police arrested a 17-year-old expelled student who had a cache of bomb-making materials at his home and a journal detailing his plans to bomb Freedom High School one…
Continue reading …Check Out Kim Kardashian’s Wedding Invitation – The Famous – omg … Kim Kardashian! Engagment To Kris Humphries!! NEW!!Pictures!!! KARDASHIAN BACHLORETTE PARTY!!! Kim Kardashian Hairstyles for Long Hair BKSnews says: # Kim Kardashian Engagement Ring Kim Kardashian Wedding: The Dress, The Invitation, The Details http://t.co/NcnCRZz
Continue reading …Warren Buffett is again calling for higher taxes on himself and other rich people, and the Wall Street Journal would like him to put a sock in it, please. In an editorial today, the newspaper suggests Buffett isn’t telling the full story. For instance, he complains that he pays only…
Continue reading …‘We were so excited about our future together,’ says Gemma Redmond of her husband Ian The wife of a British man killed in a shark attack while the couple were on honeymoon in the Seychelles has paid tribute to her husband and “best friend”. In a statement, Gemma Redmond said of Ian: “We were having so much fun and were so excited about our future together. Myself, our families and our friends are devastated and shocked by what has happened. The loss of Ian has left a gaping hole in our hearts that will never be
Continue reading …Students in Joplin, Missouri went back to school Wednesday, less than three months after the country’s single deadliest tornado in decades cut the previous school year short. Despite the obstacles, the mood was upbeat. (Aug. 17)
Continue reading …GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry told New Hampshire voters Wednesday that he does not believe in manmade global warming, calling it a scientific theory that has not been proven. (Aug. 17)
Continue reading …Citing a Daily Beast piece linking GOP candidates Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry to a radical Christian strain called “Dominionism,” CNN's Jack Cafferty fretted about a possible Christian theocracy in America on Wednesday's Cafferty File. “I got to reading this piece, and it scared the hell out of me,” Cafferty fearfully remarked of the article's conspiratorial claims. “We contacted both campaigns a few hours ago, haven't heard a word back form either one of them.” [Video below the break.] The article was published in the liberal Daily Beast and reported on by NewsBusters yesterday. Cafferty even cited NewsBusters in his brief summary of the article's critics. “And the website Newsbusters says the Daily Beast quote, 'went a few more steps off the deep end by publishing this piece',” Cafferty mentioned. According to the Daily Beast, Dominionism claims that Christians have a “God-given right to rule” all earthly institutions, political and cultural. “Think of it like political Islamism,” author Michelle Goldberg writes. And what are the ties which Perry and Bachmann supposedly possess to this movement? Bachmann was apparently “close” to one a group supporting Dominionism, and appeared in a documentary produced by that group, Truth In Action Ministries. She has also praised certain religious figures connected with the movement, according to the Daily Beast piece. Perry, meanwhile, has not directly supported the movement, at least from what the Daily Beast has found. One group, The New Apostolic Reformation, which appears to harbor Dominionist beliefs, supports Perry's bid for President and was involved in his recent prayer vigil. That's the major “link” Perry shares with these fringe beliefs. A transcript of the segment, which aired on August 17 at 5:14 p.m. EDT, is as follows: JACK CAFFERTY: Forget about the separation of church and state. There is reason to believe that religion could have a whole new meaning for the next occupant of the White House. The Daily Beast reports that two of the Republican candidates for President – Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry – are quote, “deeply associated” with a theocratic strain of Christian fundamentalism that's called “Dominionism.” For those of you who haven't heard of this before – and I was one of those, I hadn't heard of it either – stand by, 'cause this stuff is really out there. The Daily Beast writes how Dominionists believe that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions. Dominionism finds its roots in a small fringe sect called Christian Reconstructionism – people who advocate replacing U.S. law with the laws of the Old Testament. That would include the death penalty for homosexuality and abortion. Swell. The Daily Beast reports that both Bachmann and Perry appear to have ties to groups that support Dominionism. Bachmann appeared in a documentary for one of these groups called “Truth In Ministries.” Also, she often praises or cites different religious leaders who are connected to these beliefs. As for Perry, there is a group called The New Apostolic Reformation that sees him as their ticket to power. They talk about quote, “taking dominion over American society,” unquote, and they hope that Perry can claim the so-called mountain of government. This group was also involved in Perry's prayer vigil in Houston a couple of weeks ago. Critics suggest the Daily Beast's examples show so-called Dominionist groups attaching themselves to the candidates, and not so much the other way around. And the website Newsbusters says the Daily Beast quote, “went a few more steps off the deep end by publishing this piece.” We reached out to both campaigns for a response, and not unexpectedly haven't heard a word back from either one of them. Here’s the question: How much does it worry you if both Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry have ties to Dominionism? (…) CAFFRTY: This is way out there, Wolf. WOLF BLITZER: Yeah, I never heard of Dominion – like you, I never heard of Dominion – CAFFERTY: I hadn't either. I got to reading this piece, and it scared the hell out of me. I thought, what is this? BLITZER: Alright, well we're anxious to get some reaction from the Bachmann and Perry campaigns. If we do, we'll of course share it with our viewers right away. CAFFERTY: We asked for a reaction. We contacted both campaigns a few hours ago, haven't heard a word back from either one of them. BLITZER: Alright, well if they come in in the next hour or two, we'll share it with our viewers whenever we get it.
Continue reading …