Home » Archives by category » News (Page 176)
Barack Obama announces total withdrawal of US troops from Iraq

President says ‘America’s war in Iraq will be over’ with decision to pull all troops from Iraq by the end of the year President Barack Obama on Friday declared an end to the Iraq war by announcing that all American troops would be withdrawn from the country by year’s end. Obama’s statement put an end to months of wrangling over whether the US would maintain a force in Iraq beyond 2011. He never mentioned the tense and ultimately fruitless negotiations with Iraq over whether to keep several thousand US forces there as a training force and a hedge against meddling from Iran or other outside forces. Instead, Obama spoke of a promise kept, a new day for a self-reliant Iraq and a focus on building up the economy at home. “I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year,” Obama said. “After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.” Obama spoke after a private video conference with Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, and he offered assurances that the two leaders agreed on the decision. The US military presence in Iraq stands at just under 40,000. All US troops are to exit the country in accordance with a deal struck between the countries in 2008 when George Bush was president. Obama, an opponent of the war from the start, took office and accelerated the end of the conflict. In August 2010, he declared the US combat mission over. “Over the next two months our troops in Iraq, tens of thousands of them, will pack up their gear and board convoys for the journey home,” Obama said. “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.” More than 4,400 American military members have been killed since the US and its allies invaded Iraq in March 2003. The Associated Press first reported last week that the United States would not keep troops in Iraq past the year-end withdrawal deadline, except for some soldiers attached to the US embassy. Denis McDonough, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, said that in addition to the standard Marine security detail, the US will also have 4,000 to 5,000 contractors to provide security for US diplomats, including at the US embassy in Baghdad and US consulates in Basra and Erbil. In recent months, Washington had been discussing with Iraqi leaders the possibility of several thousand American troops remaining to continue training Iraqi security forces. Throughout the discussions, Iraqi leaders refused to give US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, and the Americans refused to stay without that guarantee. Moreover, Iraq’s leadership has been split on whether it wanted American forces to stay. When the 2008 agreement requiring all US forces to leave Iraq was passed, many US officials assumed it would inevitably be renegotiated so that Americans could stay longer. The US said repeatedly this year it would entertain an offer from the Iraqis to have a small force stay behind, and the Iraqis said they would like American military help. But as the year wore on and the number of American troops that Washington was suggesting could stay behind dropped, it became increasingly clear that a US troop presence was not a sure thing. The issue of legal protection for the Americans was the deal-breaker. But administration officials said they feel confident that the Iraqi security forces are well prepared to take the lead in their country. McDonough said assessment after assessment of the preparedness of Iraqi forces concluded that “these guys are ready; these guys are capable; these guys are proven; importantly, they’re proven because they’ve been tested in a lot of the kinds of threats that they’re going to see going forward. “So we feel very good about that.” Pulling troops out by the end of this year allows both Maliki and Obama to claim victory. Obama kept a campaign promise to end the war, and Maliki will have ended the American presence and restored Iraqi sovereignty. The president used the war statement to once again turn attention back to the economy, the domestic concern that is expected to determine whether he wins re-election next year. “After a decade of war the nation that we need to build and the nation that we will build is our own, an America that sees its economic strength restored just as we’ve restored our leadership around the globe.” US foreign policy Barack Obama Iraq US military Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at

Continue reading …

Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at

Continue reading …

Three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys are the only animals that remain alive after Ohio authorities used high-powered rifles to hunt down dozens of exotic animals released by a farm owner near Zanesville on Tuesday. The owner killed himself after letting the creatures loose, police say. The surviving animals are being held at

Continue reading …
ShowBiz Minute: Lohan, Jackson, Singleton

Lindsay Lohan late for first day of community service at morgue; Expert says Michael Jackson couldn’t give himself propofol; John Singleton sues Paramount for $20 million. (Oct. 21)

Continue reading …

This reports comes out while members of the congressional supercommittee are pissing and moaning about how we can’t possibly cut any more money from the Defense department . These numbers seem to indicate otherwise: How often does the Pentagon award contracts to defense companies that have already been proven to be defrauding taxpayers? A report the Department of Defense did at the request of Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) reveals an answer that should make Washington very uncomfortable. The report, released today, showed that hundreds of defense contractors found guilty of civil fraud received more than $1.1 trillion in defense contracts since 2001. The study took into account only companies that were found to have defrauded taxpayers of more than $1 million dollars. More than $573 billion went directly to companies that were guilty of defrauding taxpayers, and when you factor in the awards that went to the parent companies of those contractors, the total is $1.1 trillion. Of that $573 billion, more than two-thirds—$398 billion—went to companies after they had been found guilty of fraud. Companies convicted of “hard-core criminal fraud” received $255 million in contracts, $33 million of it after conviction. Some of the country’s biggest defense contractors were implicated. “The ugly truth is that virtually all of the major defense contractors in this country for years have been engaged in systemic fraudulent behavior, while receiving hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money,” said Sanders. According to the report: Lockheed Martin in 2008 paid $10.5 million to settle charges that it defrauded the government by submitting false invoices on a multi-billion dollar contract connected to the Titan IV space launch vehicle program. That didn’t seem to sour the relationship between Lockheed and the Defense Department, which gave Lockheed $30.2 billion in contracts in fiscal year 2009, more than ever before. In another case, Northrop Grumman paid $62 million in 2005 to settle charges that it “engaged in a fraud scheme by routinely submitting false contract proposals,” and “concealed basic problems in its handling of inventory, scrap and attrition.” Despite the serious charges of pervasive and repeated fraud, Northrop Grumman received $12.9 billion in contracts the next year, 16 percent more than the year before.

Continue reading …
Nick Punto Runs Around Adrian Beltre In Crazy Baserunning Play During World Series Game 2 (VIDEO)

It took nearly seven innings, but with a little help from second baseman Nick Punto, the St. Louis Cardinals finally got a rally going against Texas Rangers starting pitcher Colby Lewis. After Punto delivered a two-out single to advance David Freese to third, Rangers manager Ron Washington decided to go to his bullpen. Just as in Game 1, hard-throwing reliever Alexi Ogando would be facing pinch-hitter Allen Craig. And, for the second consecutive night, Craig came through with an opposite-field hit to plate a go-ahead run. And with a little more help from Punto, the inning ended in bizarre fashion. With two outs, Punto on second and Craig on first, Rafael Furcal hit a sharp grounder to third baseman Adrian Beltre. The Rangers’ star went to tag Punto, but the second baseman tried to evade him en route to third. On one level, he was successful. After all, Beltre never came close to tagging him. In a more important sense, Punto failed miserably, taking a bad angle and ending up five feet behind third base. Beltre didn’t even have to tag him, the third base umpire called Punto out for running out of the base path.. Of course, the play didn’t go unnoticed on Twitter.

Continue reading …

On Washington Post's On Faith blog, Daily Beast contributor Lisa Miller teased a piece about Occupy Wall Street with a worthy question: “What would Jesus think about Occupy Wall Street?” Her answer was simple, and predictably liberal: “The Jesus of history would love them all.” In a piece titled “Jesus at Occupy Wall Street: 'I feel like I've been here before,'” Miller portrayed the protestors as wretched outcasts, whom God would embrace because of their misery: “Born with little means into a first century world, the historical Jesus might feel right at home with the very aspects of the occupation that so many 21st century observers consider gross: the tents, the damp sleeping bags, the communal kitchen. Jesus would have sympathy, I think, with the campers' efforts to keep a small space sanitary in the absence of modern plumbing.” Poor and wretched outcasts, bringing $5500 laptops to protests. Miller did concede that the protestors didn't really concern themselves with God or religion. “The protestors don't talk much about Jesus or God. Nor do they offer explicit guidance on transcendent, higher principles.” But according to Miller, actual belief in God doesn't determine whether a person is actually a Christian or not. “A lesson from Jesus might show them that they have moral authority within their grasp – only it won't be conveyed through banners or sound bites. Their most radical act is the company they keep.” No word on what the Savior would have thought about the public sex, drug use, violent rhetoric or criminality on display, or even the crass materialism of the protestors' complaints. Nor did Miller stop to wonder if Christ would approve of making common cause with Marxists , whose philosophy resulted in the murder 100 million people. Miller cites “professor of religious studies” Bart Ehrman: “Jesus believed the whole system was corrupt. The people who ran things were empowered by the evil forces of the world and his followers had to work against these powers by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and caring for the sick.” Ehrman is a non church-going agnostic , who is the author of a book titled Forged: Writing in the Name of God-Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are . In a March 25 article on the Huffington Post, Ehrman charged the New Testament writers with lying: “It appears that some of the New Testament writers, such as the authors of 2 Peter, 1 Timothy and Ephesians, felt they were perfectly justified to lie in order to tell the truth. But we today can at least evaluate their claims and realize just how human, and fallible, they were. They were creatures of their time and place. And so too were their teachings, lies and all.” (Other scholars dispute Ehrman's contention that the Bible is a pack of lies.) A person who claims that Christianity is a “beautiful myth” may not be the best exponent of Christianity. But to liberals, the “Jesus of history” (or, more accurately, the liberal fantasy of Jesus) is more convenient to liberal tastes, because it contradicts the Jesus of the Bible. The Christ who sought to befriend and convert tax collectors so that they would give voluntarily of their means and who proposed the parable of the talents bears little resemblance to the demanding, grasping protestors, who seek government handouts and a utopia. His kingdom, of course, was “not of this world.” But the revolutionary character of Occupy Wall Street is clear. And perhaps they will chant from their holy text: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” Wait, that's not in the Bible.

Continue reading …

On Washington Post's On Faith blog, Daily Beast contributor Lisa Miller teased a piece about Occupy Wall Street with a worthy question: “What would Jesus think about Occupy Wall Street?” Her answer was simple, and predictably liberal: “The Jesus of history would love them all.” In a piece titled “Jesus at Occupy Wall Street: 'I feel like I've been here before,'” Miller portrayed the protestors as wretched outcasts, whom God would embrace because of their misery: “Born with little means into a first century world, the historical Jesus might feel right at home with the very aspects of the occupation that so many 21st century observers consider gross: the tents, the damp sleeping bags, the communal kitchen. Jesus would have sympathy, I think, with the campers' efforts to keep a small space sanitary in the absence of modern plumbing.” Poor and wretched outcasts, bringing $5500 laptops to protests. Miller did concede that the protestors didn't really concern themselves with God or religion. “The protestors don't talk much about Jesus or God. Nor do they offer explicit guidance on transcendent, higher principles.” But according to Miller, actual belief in God doesn't determine whether a person is actually a Christian or not. “A lesson from Jesus might show them that they have moral authority within their grasp – only it won't be conveyed through banners or sound bites. Their most radical act is the company they keep.” No word on what the Savior would have thought about the public sex, drug use, violent rhetoric or criminality on display, or even the crass materialism of the protestors' complaints. Nor did Miller stop to wonder if Christ would approve of making common cause with Marxists , whose philosophy resulted in the murder 100 million people. Miller cites “professor of religious studies” Bart Ehrman: “Jesus believed the whole system was corrupt. The people who ran things were empowered by the evil forces of the world and his followers had to work against these powers by feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and caring for the sick.” Ehrman is a non church-going agnostic , who is the author of a book titled Forged: Writing in the Name of God-Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are . In a March 25 article on the Huffington Post, Ehrman charged the New Testament writers with lying: “It appears that some of the New Testament writers, such as the authors of 2 Peter, 1 Timothy and Ephesians, felt they were perfectly justified to lie in order to tell the truth. But we today can at least evaluate their claims and realize just how human, and fallible, they were. They were creatures of their time and place. And so too were their teachings, lies and all.” (Other scholars dispute Ehrman's contention that the Bible is a pack of lies.) A person who claims that Christianity is a “beautiful myth” may not be the best exponent of Christianity. But to liberals, the “Jesus of history” (or, more accurately, the liberal fantasy of Jesus) is more convenient to liberal tastes, because it contradicts the Jesus of the Bible. The Christ who sought to befriend and convert tax collectors so that they would give voluntarily of their means and who proposed the parable of the talents bears little resemblance to the demanding, grasping protestors, who seek government handouts and a utopia. His kingdom, of course, was “not of this world.” But the revolutionary character of Occupy Wall Street is clear. And perhaps they will chant from their holy text: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” Wait, that's not in the Bible.

Continue reading …
Android Ice Cream Sandwich includes native stylus support

Styli and Android haven’t exactly been strangers as of late — with devices like the HTC Flyer and Samsung Galaxy Note offering pen-based input — but it looks like that option will soon be even easier to implement with Ice Cream Sandwich. As noted on Reddit , Google’s recent overview of some Android 4.0 platform highlights includes a small tidbit towards the end that details the “full support for stylus input events” in the OS — including features like pressure sensitivity and the ability to distinguish motion events from different sources (i.e. a pen and your finger). Of course, it still requires someone to actually use it, but the native support could well open up some interesting possibilities, especially when it comes to third-party apps. Android Ice Cream Sandwich includes native stylus support originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:17:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …