Home » Archives by category » News (Page 1638)
The Four Year-Old Preacher

Horrifying. Subscribe to Joe.My.God. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Joe. My. God. Discovery Date : 27/08/2011 12:15 Number of articles : 2

Continue reading …
French Socialists project ‘caring and sharing’ in bid to beat Nicolas Sarkozy

Candidates seeks to buck Europe-wide trend away from left and reassure voters of party’s economic nous ahead of 2012 election They are riding high in the polls, sensing a chance to win their first presidential vote since 1988 and buck a trend across Europe in which the left is in retreat. But France’s Socialists are gearing up for a bruising battle against Nicolas Sarkozy in next spring’s presidential election, worried that voters do not trust them to handle the financial crisis. With the 2012 presidential race wide open, the Socialists’ first hurdle is to find a candidate both charismatic and ruthless enough to defeat the genius of Sarkozy on the campaign trail and in the televised debates. François Hollande, the wise-cracking, self-styled “ordinary guy” of French politics, is the early frontrunner, deploying humour and economic nous in equal measure at this weekend’s conference in La Rochelle. A former Socialist party leader and MP in rural central France, Hollande, 57, has gone on a crash diet and smartened up his suits after splitting from his partner, the former presidential runner Ségolène Royal. Famous for his jokes – which charmed audiences at the party conference – Hollande is seen as the most presidential candidate and the most trusted on economic matters. He has an economics background and has positioned himself on the centre-left. “If we don’t dominate money, money will dominate us,” Hollande said in his conference speech, arguing that his priorities were tax reform, helping France’s desolate and largely unemployed youth, and kick-starting growth through careful state investment. Against him is Martine Aubry, 60, the mayor of Lille and the first woman to lead the Socialist party. An architect of the 35-hour week, she is seen as a defender of leftwing values and a “caring” society. One T-shirt slogan among supporters read: “Yes we care”. She told the party conference that austerity alone would not work and French economic woes must be resolved by tackling root issues of “education, employment and sustainable development”. She is seen as austere, less charismatic and less hungry for power. She jumped into the race late to replace the favourite Dominique Strauss-Kahn, viewed as dead politically after the alleged attempted rape of a New York hotel-maid. Royal is still in the race, in third position. The left may be in decline across Europe and are likely to lose in Spain this autumn, but all recent polls show that the Socialists would win if the election were to take place now. And yet party activists are extremely cautious. After the euro zone debt crisis raised investor doubts about France’s prized triple-A credit rating and unemployment last week soared to the highest level since Sarkozy’s election, the economy is at the heart of the presidential race. Sarkozy’s latest initiative for a temporary tax on the mega-wealthy was an attempt to steal the left’s clothes and ditch his “president of the rich” label. But it was attacked by the Socialists as a smokescreen to mask an unfair tax system which affords the rich tax breaks and loopholes while everyday people face new taxes on items such as fizzy drinks, cigarettes and visits to theme parks. The Socialists are aiming to convince France that a caring, sharing left can maintain a strong welfare state while kick-starting growth, cutting debt and creating jobs. For the first time, the Socialists are holding an open primary race allowing not just party members but the whole electorate to choose the candidate. The 9 October vote is open to anyone on the electoral register if they sign a declaration that they adhere to the values of the left and pay one euro. Many party members said the Socialist lead in the polls was down to the left-leaning spirit of French society – with the republican ideals of the strong state, social welfare protection and a general anti-capitalist feeling. Often opinion polls favour the left long before an election, but then voters swing right on concrete policy issues at the ballot box. “The French have their hearts on their left and wallets on their right,” said one Socialist activist from the south. “The individualism of Sarkozyism is winning out and our challenge is to convince people we can create a reasonable society where economic development is for everyone not just about a privileged few.” France Europe Nicolas Sarkozy Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
French Socialists project ‘caring and sharing’ in bid to beat Nicolas Sarkozy

Candidates seeks to buck Europe-wide trend away from left and reassure voters of party’s economic nous ahead of 2012 election They are riding high in the polls, sensing a chance to win their first presidential vote since 1988 and buck a trend across Europe in which the left is in retreat. But France’s Socialists are gearing up for a bruising battle against Nicolas Sarkozy in next spring’s presidential election, worried that voters do not trust them to handle the financial crisis. With the 2012 presidential race wide open, the Socialists’ first hurdle is to find a candidate both charismatic and ruthless enough to defeat the genius of Sarkozy on the campaign trail and in the televised debates. François Hollande, the wise-cracking, self-styled “ordinary guy” of French politics, is the early frontrunner, deploying humour and economic nous in equal measure at this weekend’s conference in La Rochelle. A former Socialist party leader and MP in rural central France, Hollande, 57, has gone on a crash diet and smartened up his suits after splitting from his partner, the former presidential runner Ségolène Royal. Famous for his jokes – which charmed audiences at the party conference – Hollande is seen as the most presidential candidate and the most trusted on economic matters. He has an economics background and has positioned himself on the centre-left. “If we don’t dominate money, money will dominate us,” Hollande said in his conference speech, arguing that his priorities were tax reform, helping France’s desolate and largely unemployed youth, and kick-starting growth through careful state investment. Against him is Martine Aubry, 60, the mayor of Lille and the first woman to lead the Socialist party. An architect of the 35-hour week, she is seen as a defender of leftwing values and a “caring” society. One T-shirt slogan among supporters read: “Yes we care”. She told the party conference that austerity alone would not work and French economic woes must be resolved by tackling root issues of “education, employment and sustainable development”. She is seen as austere, less charismatic and less hungry for power. She jumped into the race late to replace the favourite Dominique Strauss-Kahn, viewed as dead politically after the alleged attempted rape of a New York hotel-maid. Royal is still in the race, in third position. The left may be in decline across Europe and are likely to lose in Spain this autumn, but all recent polls show that the Socialists would win if the election were to take place now. And yet party activists are extremely cautious. After the euro zone debt crisis raised investor doubts about France’s prized triple-A credit rating and unemployment last week soared to the highest level since Sarkozy’s election, the economy is at the heart of the presidential race. Sarkozy’s latest initiative for a temporary tax on the mega-wealthy was an attempt to steal the left’s clothes and ditch his “president of the rich” label. But it was attacked by the Socialists as a smokescreen to mask an unfair tax system which affords the rich tax breaks and loopholes while everyday people face new taxes on items such as fizzy drinks, cigarettes and visits to theme parks. The Socialists are aiming to convince France that a caring, sharing left can maintain a strong welfare state while kick-starting growth, cutting debt and creating jobs. For the first time, the Socialists are holding an open primary race allowing not just party members but the whole electorate to choose the candidate. The 9 October vote is open to anyone on the electoral register if they sign a declaration that they adhere to the values of the left and pay one euro. Many party members said the Socialist lead in the polls was down to the left-leaning spirit of French society – with the republican ideals of the strong state, social welfare protection and a general anti-capitalist feeling. Often opinion polls favour the left long before an election, but then voters swing right on concrete policy issues at the ballot box. “The French have their hearts on their left and wallets on their right,” said one Socialist activist from the south. “The individualism of Sarkozyism is winning out and our challenge is to convince people we can create a reasonable society where economic development is for everyone not just about a privileged few.” France Europe Nicolas Sarkozy Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Labour seeks law change to stop News Corp renewing BSkyB bid

Fears that Rupert Murdoch could reopen bid prompts ‘public interest test’ motion by shadow culture secretary Ivan Lewis Labour is trying to secure cross-party support for an emergency change in the law to prevent News Corporation from renewing its bid to take full ownership of BSkyB. In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government, Labour said there was still a possibility that Rupert Murdoch could reopen his bid and the law should be changed to allow ministers to block it. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, will introduce a negative motion when parliament returns next week, which – if approved by all parties – could go ahead without a vote. He has written to the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, and the Lib Dem culture spokesman, Don Foster, with his proposals. The aim would be to introduce a new public interest test applicable to media barons to rule people out based on their conduct. Under Labour’s proposed amendments to Section 58 of the Enterprise Act 2002, ministers would be given the necessary powers to ask regulators to apply a wide-ranging public interest test. Ministers would be also be able to intervene at any stage in the process if new information came to light. Lewis said: “These measures are necessary to ensure that while we wait for the outcome of the Leveson inquiry, no changes in media ownership can occur which are not in the public interest. “It is essential we learn lessons from the BSkyB fiasco so that media integrity is the top priority when considering future ownership and merger changes. “Ultimately, there is a strong case for removing politicians from media ownership and merger decisions. But, in the meantime, we must act to address the legal ambiguities which allowed Jeremy Hunt to disregard growing public concern and damaged public trust in the credibility of the decision making process.” In his letter to Hunt, Lewis argued that ministers should be removed from the approval process in the long term, but that while the existing legislation was in place emergency moves were urgently needed to close the loophole that could allow Murdoch to simply bid again for control of BSkyB. The negative motion will be laid in both houses of parliament when they return on 5 September. News Corporation Rupert Murdoch BSkyB Phone hacking Media business Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Television industry Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Labour seeks law change to stop News Corp renewing BSkyB bid

Fears that Rupert Murdoch could reopen bid prompts ‘public interest test’ motion by shadow culture secretary Ivan Lewis Labour is trying to secure cross-party support for an emergency change in the law to prevent News Corporation from renewing its bid to take full ownership of BSkyB. In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government, Labour said there was still a possibility that Rupert Murdoch could reopen his bid and the law should be changed to allow ministers to block it. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, will introduce a negative motion when parliament returns next week, which – if approved by all parties – could go ahead without a vote. He has written to the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, and the Lib Dem culture spokesman, Don Foster, with his proposals. The aim would be to introduce a new public interest test applicable to media barons to rule people out based on their conduct. Under Labour’s proposed amendments to Section 58 of the Enterprise Act 2002, ministers would be given the necessary powers to ask regulators to apply a wide-ranging public interest test. Ministers would be also be able to intervene at any stage in the process if new information came to light. Lewis said: “These measures are necessary to ensure that while we wait for the outcome of the Leveson inquiry, no changes in media ownership can occur which are not in the public interest. “It is essential we learn lessons from the BSkyB fiasco so that media integrity is the top priority when considering future ownership and merger changes. “Ultimately, there is a strong case for removing politicians from media ownership and merger decisions. But, in the meantime, we must act to address the legal ambiguities which allowed Jeremy Hunt to disregard growing public concern and damaged public trust in the credibility of the decision making process.” In his letter to Hunt, Lewis argued that ministers should be removed from the approval process in the long term, but that while the existing legislation was in place emergency moves were urgently needed to close the loophole that could allow Murdoch to simply bid again for control of BSkyB. The negative motion will be laid in both houses of parliament when they return on 5 September. News Corporation Rupert Murdoch BSkyB Phone hacking Media business Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Television industry Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Irene Pounds Long Island With Major Flooding

What eventually became Tropical Storm Irene flooded streets and knocked out power on Long Island. As AP’s Haven Daley reports, residents have to wait for the water to recede before the clean up can begin. (August 28)

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Irene Charges Into New England

Irene raced across a shuttered New York City and charged into the northern New England region on Sunday as it weakened to a tropical storm. (Aug. 28)

Continue reading …

No big surprise here, but it looks like we’ve got another Republican House member refusing to meet with constituents who are angry about their vote for the Ryan budget which would eliminate Medicare as we know it. Here’s more from Show Me Progress on Missouri Rep. Todd Akin, who apparently is afraid of the group of primarily senior citizens who showed up outside of his office to protest earlier this week. Todd Akin greets peaceful constituents. With cops. : Eight cop cars. That’s how many it took to quell the “riot” by 50 or so little old ladies and 50 others of assorted ages (and sexes) who tried to storm Representative Todd Akin’s office in West St. Louis County Wednesday afternoon. Since Akin refuses ever to respond to requests from Democratic constituents asking for a meeting or a phone call, much less a town hall, these folks called their own town hall a block from his office and invited him to attend. He didn’t show. Of course. So the crowd had the gall to approach his majesty’s office and were told by the cops which little bright patch of sunlight they might occupy while they listened to a few speakers. Why is it that peaceful people–and there were no weapons in this group more dangerous than a few rapier like wits–cannot even approach the office paid for by taxpayers without having the police–union workers that we taxpayers fund–sicced on them? More there with lots of pictures of those very scary looking seniors that came out to protest. Republicans loved it when we had these “tea partiers” coming out to scream at Democrats over the health care bill. Now that the tables have turned and their approval numbers are at an all time low, they’re not so thrilled with the idea of being held accountable to their constituents. You can’t blame any of them for wanting to be cautious after what happened to Gabby Giffords, but I don’t think that excuses them refusing to meet with or respond to voters at all.

Continue reading …

Rick Perry’s presidential campaign comes with a large security detail provided by Texas state police, but its costs are going to secret for the next 18 months, thanks to a provision added to a school finance bill, reports the Washington Post . Perry—who was “extremely concerned” to protect his travel…

Continue reading …
Kent And Elizabeth Swig Face Foreclosure In ‘World’s Richest Apartment Building’

Millions of Americans have lost their homes as a result of the foreclosure crisis. But not until now has one of those stories involved what author Michael Gross called “the world’s richest apartment building.” Property developer Kent Swig and his soon-to-be ex-wife Elizabeth are facing foreclosure on their apartment located at billionaire co-op 740 Park Avenue in New York City, the U.K.’s Daily Mail reports. The couple reportedly stopped making payments on two loans worth $16 million over 23 months ago. Real estate experts are stunned that the Swigs were ever allowed to borrow against the apartment, according to the Daily Mail, since it’s in violation of the co-op’s strict regulations. Yet the Swigs are far from the first high-income Americans to be threatened by foreclosure, nor the most famous. Others afflicted include R&B singer R.Kelly, who stands to lose his Chicago mansion to foreclosure, and actor Burt Reynolds, who’s $1.5 million behind on mortgage payments for his Hobe Sound, Florida estate. And the foreclosure crisis isn’t necessarily over yet, as it was recently reported that delinquent mortgages are on the rise. All too often, these mortgage delinquencies can quickly turn into foreclosure horror stories far more common than the Swigs’, including soldiers returning home from Iraq to find his home repurchased that day, or 70-year-old Sharon Bullington’s, who lost her home due to a payment mix-up even after negotiating a mortgage modification . But despite the Daily Mail indicating that the recession “finally [caught] up with New York’s mega rich,” this is largely a low- and middle-class crisis. As Warren Buffett pointed out in a recent New York Times op-ed, that the recession’s effect is so socially-stratified could be due to the differing means of accruing income, with the wealthy relying more on income from capital gains — the beneficiary of high corporate profits — and lower class Americans on jobs and wages, neither of which are growing much at all. Indeed, the gap between rich and poor continues to rise. According to The Atlantic, the combined earnings of the poorest 60 percent of Americans only equals the income of the wealthiest 1 percent, largely due to capital gains.

Continue reading …