Someone in the Afghan presidential palace intentionally leaked the news that the US was negotiating with the Taliban, scuttling the talks and sending the US contact into hiding, sources tell the AP . Hamid Karzai didn’t trust the US and feared any deal between it and the Taliban would diminish his…
Continue reading …[caption id="attachment_180118" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Usted use Tweetdeck? (YouTube)"] [1][/caption] Mayor Michael Bloomberg made a visit to Engine 166/Ladder 86 Fire Company on Staten Island today, to thank the firefighters there for their work and hold his second post-Irene press conference. With clear skies and the city back to work, the mood was light enough for a daring reporter… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The New York Observer Discovery Date : 29/08/2011 20:47 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Five months before invasion, pair agreed to go ahead if weapons breach was revealed, according to newly released letter Britain and the US were planning to take action against Saddam Hussein without a second UN resolution five months before the invasion of Iraq, a newly released letter from Tony Blair’s office shows. A letter from Blair’s private secretary reveals that “we and the US would take action” without a new resolution by the UN security council if UN weapons inspectors showed Saddam had clearly breached an earlier resolution. In that case, he “would not have a second chance”. That was the only way Britain could persuade the Bush administration to agree to a role for the UN and continuing work by UN weapons inspectors, the letter says. Dated 17 October 2002, it was written by Matthew Rycroft to Mark Sedwill, private secretary to the foreign secretary, Jack Straw. “This letter is sensitive,” Rycroft underlined. “It must be seen only by those with a real need to know its contents, and must not be copied further.” He sent it to a number of other senior officials, including Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain’s ambassador to the UN. There is no indication that it was seen by Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general, who at the time was advising that invading Iraq without a fresh UN resolution would be illegal. Rycroft’s letter referred to a Downing Street meeting on the Iraqi crisis attended by Straw, the defence secretary, Geoff Hoon, and the chief of the defence staff, Admiral Sir Mike Boyce. Also present were Blair’s chief of staff, Jonathan Powell; his director of government relations, Sally Morgan; his director of communications, Alastair Campbell; and his chief foreign policy adviser, David Manning. The meeting concluded, wrote Rycroft, that “the only way to keep the US on the UN route was for there to be a clear understanding that if [chief UN weapons inspector Hans] Blix reported an Iraqi breach of the first resolution, then Saddam would not have a second chance”. In a devastating passage, Rycroft added: “In other words, if for some reason [such as a French or Russian veto] there were no second resolution agreed … we and the US would take action.” The Downing Street letter is particularly significant considering the government’s repeated emphasis in public at the time on the need for UN approval before any invasion of Iraq. The first resolution referred to in Rycroft’s letter was number 1441, passed unanimously in November 2002. Goldsmith and most of the government’s legal advisers insisted a second UN resolution was needed before military action could lawfully take place. Blair was put in an even more difficult position with Washington as, in the event, Blix never reported an unconditional breach of the first resolution. The Rycroft letter also appears to conflict with Straw’s actions at the time. A statement recently released by the Chilcot inquiry revealed that in October 2002 Straw told his French counterpart, Dominique de Villepin, that US acceptance of the wording of the first UN resolution “implied” a further one was required. The statement was written by Sir Michael Wood, the Foreign Office’s top legal adviser, who also opposed the invasion. It also disclosed that Greenstock had told his US counterpart that Britain would state publicly after the resolution was passed “that there needed to be a second resolution”. The issue is at the heart of the deep and continuing arguments over the legality of the invasion. Goldsmith originally advised Blair and Straw that the first UN resolution did not provide sufficient legal cover for war. Goldsmith said he changed his mind in February 2003 after Bush’s legal advisers told him on a US visit that they had agreed to the wording of 1441 only because it had not crossed their “red line” – the clear message was that, as far as the US was concerned, no new resolution was needed. Philippe Sands, professor of international law at University College London, said: “The letter of 17 October 2002 is consistent with the conclusion that the prime minister wanted to proceed to action with the US on the basis of a single security council resolution, irrespective of what the law required, and ignoring the views at the time of the Foreign Office legal adviser and the attorney general.” According to Wood’s statement to the Chilcot inquiry, Straw told the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, “that we needed a second resolution and that it was extremely unlikely we could find a legal basis without it”. Sands said: “It reflects the widespread view that what became UNSCR 1441 would not authorise military action without a second resolution. His latest statement shoots a very big hole in the arguments of Messrs Goldsmith and Straw, and one wonders why they ultimately failed to reflect its contents in their words and actions.” Tony Blair Iraq war inquiry Foreign policy US foreign policy Iraq Middle East George Bush United States Chris Ames Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cash for Conservative project fast-tracked to charity which was sole bidder for the work, part of the ‘big society’ agenda The controversial Tory initiative to set up free schools received fast-track public funding after fierce lobbying from Michael Gove’s inner circle of advisers, according to leaked emails. Civil servants were urged that the New Schools Network (NSN) – a charity providing advice and guidance to set up the schools – should be given “cash without delay”, in a disclosure which will heighten concern over the government’s lack of transparency about the wider free schools programme. The charity, which is headed by a former Gove adviser, was subsequently given a £500,000 grant. No other organisation was invited to bid for the work. The award was made after an email from Dominic Cummings, a Tory strategist and confidant of Gove, called for: “MG telling the civil servants to find a way to give NSN cash without delay.” Cummings went on to work for the charity on a freelance basis. Sent after the election last May, his message goes on to say: “Labour has handed hundreds of millions to leftie orgs – if u guys cant navigate this thro the bureauc then not a chance of any new schools starting!!” The existence of the email can be revealed as the first 24 free schools prepare to open their doors to pupils. The first wave of free schools includes one which has the journalist Toby Young as its chair of governors, two Jewish faith schools, a Hindu school and a Sikh school. At least three of the schools – Discovery new school in West Sussex, St Luke’s in north London, and Canary Wharf college – will have a Christian ethos. The Maharishi school in Lancashire, which was founded by the Beatles’ guru Maharish Mahesh Yogi and teaches children to meditate, has become a state school as part of the programme. The schools will be the most prominent part of the Tories’ “big society” vision, although in many cases faith organisations, education companies or existing academy sponsors have taken the lead rather than groups of parents or teachers. The government has declined to reveal the costs of funding individual free schools but estimates the overall budget for buildings at between £110m to £130m. It has also declined requests under the Freedom of Information Act to identify the groups applying to open free schools next year. In the email Cummings sets out a timetable for the creation of free schools. He outlines a list of demands – from a “legislative/regulatory timetable” to a “big early july conference with hundreds coming (paid for by dcsf)”. Legislation to enable the creation of free schools was pushed through parliament last summer under procedures usually reserved for counter-terrorism measures. The government held a free schools conference – which David Cameron addressed by videolink – in January. The message was addressed to Gove; his senior policy adviser Sam Freedman; Rachel Wolf, who heads the NSN; and Gove’s special adviser Henry de Zoete. Lisa Nandy, a Labour member of the education select committee, said: “This is definitive proof that this was a way of diverting taxpayers’ money to pay for a political agenda, at a time when the government was making huge spending cuts. Just shortly after that grant was announced they cancelled Building Schools for the Future – it’s pretty shocking. “This confirms what many suspected, that there is a political agenda behind the decision to hand over the money to the New Schools Network. Gove has serious questions to answer – this message is addressed to him, the money was handed over shortly afterwards in a fog of confusion.” A further leaked email reveals the blurred boundaries which existed between Gove’s team and the New Schools Network. In the email, Wolf is asked by one of Gove’s staff to provide the prime minister with a “line to take” after a Tory councillor in Birmingham raised concerns that a free school in his city had the potential to be “socially divisive and undermine … community cohesion”. Wolf worked as a special adviser to Gove while he was shadow education secretary. On its website, the New Schools Network describes itself as an “independent charity” which has been given a government grant to act as the first point of contact with free school proposers. Nandy said the email indicated that the NSN had been given public money to act as “a propaganda machine for a political agenda”. “What they are asking for is a way to play down the negative impact of free schools. They gave this contract to the New Schools Network to provide independent, impartial advice to people setting up free schools. That should surely include advice on the downside of setting up new schools, not just the positive. They were given taxpayers’ money in order to act as a propaganda machine for a political agenda.” The email from Cummings gives an indication of the attitude towards the civil service by those around Gove. He writes that: “There needs to be an announcement soon about indicative timetables for new schools and what is going to be achieved before august. Forcing the conference in july will force the department to focus on it.” Another leaked email exchange indicates that Cummings was closely involved in government work. This email exchange shows that he was invited to a “prep session” ahead of the spending review last October. According to the emails, this involved “posing challenging questions to SoS [Gove] to ensure that his briefing is adequate and to iron out any detailed narrative.” Wolf said that Cummings started work for the NSN as a volunteer at the end of June, and freelanced for them from July to December last year. She said: “He initially volunteered then we hired him as a freelancer paid by the half day. He did various projects – mostly publications, communications and strategy. He averaged about 10 days a month. “We were always extremely clear about what specific jobs he was doing for us. He had a standard freelance contract like the others we hire. Those jobs were not about Michael [Gove] and politics. We hired him because he’s really, really good and we know that he believes in what we’re doing, and he helped us out a lot. “I’m confident we didn’t do anything that was inappropriate. We’re obviously very mindful of our obligations as a charity.” Wolf said the NSN had not received any government funds since mid-July this year and was being financed entirely by donors. Cummings said the NSN has “unique abilities”, and without it there would not have been any free schools this year. “It was no secret that I thought NSN should be funded as fast as possible so that new schools could open as fast as possible – I said the same thing to senior officials many times.” Free schools Michael Gove Education policy Secondary schools Primary schools Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Obama’s team still has time to work on his Labor Day speech since many polls have been released the last few weeks which indicate that their strategy of being reasonable to win the hearts of Independents is not working. Historian Rick Perlstein wrote: “How Democrats Win: Defending the Social Safety Net ,” which might be a good place to start (hint, hint). A new Pew Research poll came out last week and I wanted to touch on it. Polling for Obama is down for various reasons. but this poll is very interesting because his base and the mythical Independents are unhappy even if the poll shows that he’s doing much better than Congress. And lookie here. They want to see some Rocky Marciano jump into the political ring. Democrats also want Obama to get tougher in his dealings with congressional Republicans. Currently, 57% of Democrats say Obama should challenge the Republicans more often, while 32% say he is handling relations with the GOP about right. In early April, just 39% of Democrats said Obama should do more to challenge Republicans and 47% said said he was handling things about right. Kevin Drum writes: Independents Finally Getting Fed Up Jon Chait points out that the results of the latest Pew poll are pretty remarkable: People always want leaders to compromise. It’s amazing that a plurality wants Obama to confront the GOP more strongly. Want to see something even more amazing? You’re seeing non-trivial numbers of Republicans say that Obama should stand up to the Republicans. enlarge Credit: Pew Pew Poll: Americans want Obama to fight back against the GOP He’s right. It’s no surprise that liberal Democrats increasingly want Obama to fight back against Republicans, but that’s not the real story here. The biggest shifts in attitude have come from the center. Take a look at the circled parts of the table: the entire middle of the political spectrum — liberal Republicans, independents, and conservative Democrats — is speaking pretty loudly here. They want Obama to fight back harder against the shouters in the tea party wing of the GOP. As Chait points out, Obama is walking a tightrope: if he does get more confrontational, he risks losing ground in the areas where he’s still viewed positively (trustworthy, well-informed, cares about people, etc.). But he better figure out how to walk it. His entire electoral strategy is based on winning the middle, and the middle is getting fed up. You can see the full Pew poll here. It’s interesting reading. Chait, a writer who at times I have been critical of ends his piece with this . The question hanging over Obama’s political strategy has always been the endgame. His obsession with seeming reasonable makes sense if he uses it as an asset to spend down at the end. You do everything to show your willingness to compromise, and when the opposition refuses and refuses, finally you assail them for their fanaticism. It’s harrowing to watch, because we don’t know until the last minute whether we’re witnessing a rope-a-dope strategy, or just a boxer being beaten to a pulp. The poll results all say the same thing. Americans are tired of the rope-a-dope stratagem; being more reasonable and looking for a Grand Bargain that reduces the deficit. They want jobs, preferably ones that have a future, unemployment kept available and they want their social safety nets protected from the Norquist Pillagers. I’ll have more on what he can do later….
Continue reading …Weather Channel reporter Eric Fisher was giving a live report about Hurricane Irene on Saturday when a streaker disrupted his coverage. Fisher said he was “pretty much speechless” about the swarms of people he saw reveling in the streets of Virginia Beach, even as Hurricane Irene whipped about all around him. Fisher clearly thought people were being foolish and reckless, but said he would “bite his tongue” to avoid being too frank about the situation. As if to prove his point, a group of young men in bathing suits ran past him during the live report he was giving, and one of them even flashed the camera–from behind and in front. Watch the footage below (warning: graphic video):
Continue reading …While shopping one day with a friend, we can across a top we both loved–one size fits all. Could we both wear the same top and look fabulous? It sort of fit us both, but it didn’t look quite right on either of us. For most things in life, one size doesn’t really fit all. Divorce is the same. Divorce myth #1: Divorce is the end of a happy life. Divorce is certainly an end, but it can also be a beginning to a new and fulfilling life. It is possible to build a better life post-divorce than the one you had before. Figure out what it is that you want out of life, and what you need to do to get there. Divorce myth #2: Divorce is bad for everyone involved. For many, divorce is a difficult experience. But there are those who are relieved that the marriage is over, and who relish the opportunity to start over. It does require strength and confidence. But if you were in relationship that was destructive to you for a variety of reasons, then good for you: You can face life head on and take control of your future. Divorce myth #3: Children of divorce are doomed to a life of trouble. Research indicates that children are resilient. It’s the ways that their parents handle their divorce that affects the way that their children deal with divorce. It is possible for children to develop happy and emotionally balanced lives. It’s the way their parents manage divorce that determines how positive the outcome is. Divorce myth #4: Communication becomes better once you leave your spouse. Many people think that things will improve between former spouses once the divorce is final, especially if they have children. If you had trouble communicating during the marriage, chances are high that you will continue to have trouble communicating. If you couldn’t change him when you were married, you are not going to change him now. Accept that the only thing you have control over changing is yourself. Linda Popielarczyk, a registered Social Worker in Toronto, sees many separating and divorcing clients in her private practice. She notes that those with children are sometimes surprised to realize that that divorce does not end the relationship. “It is never really over for divorcing parents…rather, their challenge is to redefine their relationship to create a stable parenting partnership, despite their difficulties as partners in marriage.” Popielarczyk sometimes finds parents will continue to argue with each other and complain about the same issues following separation as during their marriage. In these cases, they can be surprised to realize that they remain connected through these disagreements; and that they are not likely to change their former partners in separation, when they were unable to do so in marriage. Divorce myth #5: The grass is greener on the other side. Often times people think that the problems behind their own unhappiness are somehow because of the marriage, and divorce will make the discontent go away, and all of a sudden sex and life will miraculously get better. There is a lot of self-work that needs to be done in order to find your own self happiness; another person can’t do that for you. Examine your experience of marriage, not just what wasn’t good, but was great and what worked. Take some responsibility for your contribution, good and bad. Use this learning to point you in the direction of where you want to go, what you want to pursue and what you need in future relationships. Be introspective, and ensure you don’t get trapped into falling into relationship patterns that didn’t work previously. Popielarczyk finds that divorce often represents a significant loss for adults, even when children are not involved. The longer the marriage, the greater the likelihood that ‘the relationship’ forms a significant part of one’s identity. “People need to process what the separation means to them on an emotional level; to consider the marriage/relationship in terms of what was good, what was not so good, and how they may have contributed; and, who they are and want to become, as individuals, separate from the relationship.” It does one good to become conscious of lessons learned from the old relationship, or else risk a replay of the dynamics in subsequent relationships. This article first appeared on more.ca
Continue reading …Two weeks ago, when billionaire Warren Buffett called for higher taxes on rich people like him, the liberal media predictably gushed and fawned. Yet when Americans for Better Government revealed last week that Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway has been in an almost decade-long dispute with the IRS over how much taxes it owes, these same press members couldn't care less: According to Berkshire Hathaway’s own annual report — see Note 15 on pp. 54-56 — the company has been in a years-long dispute over its federal tax bills. According to the report, “We anticipate that we will resolve all adjustments proposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (‘IRS’) for the 2002 through 2004 tax years at the IRS Appeals Division within the next 12 months. The IRS has completed its examination of our consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns for the 2005 and 2006 tax years and the proposed adjustments are currently being reviewed by the IRS Appeals Division process. The IRS is currently auditing our consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns for the 2007 through 2009 tax years.” Americans for Limited Government researcher Richard McCarty, who was alerted to the controversy by a federal government lawyer, said, “The company has been short-changing the tax collection agency for much of the past decade.
Continue reading …Petra Ecclestone put most lavish celebrity weddings to shame with her own $7.7 million nuptials this weekend, held at the same Italian castle where Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes got married (for the comparative bargain of just $2 million) in 2006. Ecclestone, 22, is, of course, the daughter of…
Continue reading …Entourage’s writers are trying something difficult in the few weeks before the series ends — giving Vincent Chase, the womanizing, patronizing movie star, actual character development. They’re trying to have Vince grow up and see the sadness in his years of chasing women, but they’re doing it by having him chase a woman. Strange, I
Continue reading …