angieayyee says: RT @ justJosef34 : Ive been meaning to find this out since sunday, but what does “ che cosa ” mean #jerseyshore
Continue reading …Jonathan Ross returns to chat this Saturday with his new ITV show. But will it be a success? Industry experts – including Michael Parkinson – give their views On Saturday, ITV1 will premiere The Jonathan Ross Show, marking the return of the rhotacistic rascal to primetime chat – a format which will allow Ross to interview a rarefied raft of celebrities and also, perhaps, rehabilitate himself in the public affection after the fallout of the Sachsgate scandal. The question is: will Ross be a success on ITV? The broadcaster’s last defection at the same level was when Michael Parkinson transferred from the BBC to ITV in 2004. And we know how that went. The chat legend lasted three not entirely successful years before retiring in 2007. His first show has a pretty strong line-up with Formula One driver Lewis Hamilton, singer Adele and someone ITV would like described as “A-list American actress” Sarah Jessica Parker all perching on Ross’s new sofa. Sometimes his BBC show, Friday Night With Jonathan Ross, did rather lag when it came to the quality of guests. One outing just before Ross’s fall from grace featured Andrew Marr, Anthony Head and Yazoo featured alongside SJP. To say it dragged a little would be being kind. Even before his suspension there was talk Ross had lost his touch and that his chat show had become too dull and toadying. And his new show also has the disadvantage of not going out live – it will be pre-recorded on a Thursday night for broadcast on ITV1 on Saturday evening at 9.45pm, following the results show for Red or Black? the latest Ant and Dec vehicle. So does Ross still have anything to prove? Will he be constrained by ITV? Will they allow him to ad-lib in the way he seems to like – but which can get him into trouble? Will his flow be upset by the commercial breaks? Or will it be business as usual? You may even think the chatshow format as a whole is finished in this age of PR hegemony where stars can communicate direct to their audiences on Twitter and the like. But tell us what you think. In the meantime here’s what critics, contemporaries and fellow broadcasters make of his return to screen – with Parky weighing in on his erstwhile rival. Michael Parkinson, broadcaster and former chatshow king Jonathan needs no advice from me – he has been doing the job for as long as anyone and he can look after himself. I wish him well. I have always been a fan. Of course he will meet a different audience, and he will have to deliver the show a little differently, but he has already worked quite a lot for ITV and he is long enough in the tooth to know the ropes. He’ll be able to dance rings round any problems because he is very good at what he does. Of course he doesn’t appeal to everybody, but Jonathan has had a long career – and you don’t have a long career without actually having what the public want. He has made some mistakes as a presenter but he will do well wherever he goes. It wasn’t the easy option in ratings terms at the BBC, so I don’t think there’s a great deal more pressure there [at ITV] than he’s had before. He will have to shape the show around the ad breaks and use them as punctuation points but that won’t be a big problem. Andrew Billen, TV reviewer, the Times The waters close quickly over TV celebs these days. The X Factor and talent show format is king. But a more mature reinvented Ross would be worth checking out. He should ask advice from Chris Evans on how to do it. He is use to, from his Channel 4 days, to the constraints of ad breaks etc so technically it should be no problem working on ITV. As for the audience, he will need to woo them not take them for granted. He will need to be both gentler and funnier. Change comes from within they say. Mark Borkowski, publicist and branding expert My only worry about this is the slot – they are putting him in a key Saturday night moment which will put a lot of pressure on him and that’s not the best place for him. He will cross with Match of the Day. It will all come down to whether or not he is given the freedom to be Jonathan Ross – that’s the key. Wossy’s downfall could be the show is a pre-record – they should take the risk and have him live. He has done well because of who he is: the danger, cheekiness and boyishness. He is a real enthusiast and if ITV make him a sub-Parkinson pastiche then it won’t work. He has proved that he is unique and brilliant and people such as Graham Norton haven’t really been able to fill his shoes. He is a big name and needs to be left alone. TV without Jonathan Ross is a sadder place. Victor Olliver (AKA Madame Arcati blogger) former Teletext
Continue reading …Jonathan Ross returns to chat this Saturday with his new ITV show. But will it be a success? Industry experts – including Michael Parkinson – give their views On Saturday, ITV1 will premiere The Jonathan Ross Show, marking the return of the rhotacistic rascal to primetime chat – a format which will allow Ross to interview a rarefied raft of celebrities and also, perhaps, rehabilitate himself in the public affection after the fallout of the Sachsgate scandal. The question is: will Ross be a success on ITV? The broadcaster’s last defection at the same level was when Michael Parkinson transferred from the BBC to ITV in 2004. And we know how that went. The chat legend lasted three not entirely successful years before retiring in 2007. His first show has a pretty strong line-up with Formula One driver Lewis Hamilton, singer Adele and someone ITV would like described as “A-list American actress” Sarah Jessica Parker all perching on Ross’s new sofa. Sometimes his BBC show, Friday Night With Jonathan Ross, did rather lag when it came to the quality of guests. One outing just before Ross’s fall from grace featured Andrew Marr, Anthony Head and Yazoo featured alongside SJP. To say it dragged a little would be being kind. Even before his suspension there was talk Ross had lost his touch and that his chat show had become too dull and toadying. And his new show also has the disadvantage of not going out live – it will be pre-recorded on a Thursday night for broadcast on ITV1 on Saturday evening at 9.45pm, following the results show for Red or Black? the latest Ant and Dec vehicle. So does Ross still have anything to prove? Will he be constrained by ITV? Will they allow him to ad-lib in the way he seems to like – but which can get him into trouble? Will his flow be upset by the commercial breaks? Or will it be business as usual? You may even think the chatshow format as a whole is finished in this age of PR hegemony where stars can communicate direct to their audiences on Twitter and the like. But tell us what you think. In the meantime here’s what critics, contemporaries and fellow broadcasters make of his return to screen – with Parky weighing in on his erstwhile rival. Michael Parkinson, broadcaster and former chatshow king Jonathan needs no advice from me – he has been doing the job for as long as anyone and he can look after himself. I wish him well. I have always been a fan. Of course he will meet a different audience, and he will have to deliver the show a little differently, but he has already worked quite a lot for ITV and he is long enough in the tooth to know the ropes. He’ll be able to dance rings round any problems because he is very good at what he does. Of course he doesn’t appeal to everybody, but Jonathan has had a long career – and you don’t have a long career without actually having what the public want. He has made some mistakes as a presenter but he will do well wherever he goes. It wasn’t the easy option in ratings terms at the BBC, so I don’t think there’s a great deal more pressure there [at ITV] than he’s had before. He will have to shape the show around the ad breaks and use them as punctuation points but that won’t be a big problem. Andrew Billen, TV reviewer, the Times The waters close quickly over TV celebs these days. The X Factor and talent show format is king. But a more mature reinvented Ross would be worth checking out. He should ask advice from Chris Evans on how to do it. He is use to, from his Channel 4 days, to the constraints of ad breaks etc so technically it should be no problem working on ITV. As for the audience, he will need to woo them not take them for granted. He will need to be both gentler and funnier. Change comes from within they say. Mark Borkowski, publicist and branding expert My only worry about this is the slot – they are putting him in a key Saturday night moment which will put a lot of pressure on him and that’s not the best place for him. He will cross with Match of the Day. It will all come down to whether or not he is given the freedom to be Jonathan Ross – that’s the key. Wossy’s downfall could be the show is a pre-record – they should take the risk and have him live. He has done well because of who he is: the danger, cheekiness and boyishness. He is a real enthusiast and if ITV make him a sub-Parkinson pastiche then it won’t work. He has proved that he is unique and brilliant and people such as Graham Norton haven’t really been able to fill his shoes. He is a big name and needs to be left alone. TV without Jonathan Ross is a sadder place. Victor Olliver (AKA Madame Arcati blogger) former Teletext
Continue reading …Thousands of hotels claim travel website does not check its reviews and many are therefore misleading, fake or defamatory TripAdvisor is to be investigated by the advertising watchdog after receiving a complaint on behalf of thousands of hotels that its claims to provide trustworthy and honest reviews from travellers are false. The Advertising Standards Authority has launched a formal investigation into TripAdvisor, the hugely popular travel review website that parent company Expedia intends to spin off as a separate business, after receiving a complaint from a company called KwikChex.com. Bournemouth-based KwikChex.com, which helps companies manage their online reputations, has been vigorously pursuing TripAdvisor since last year over what it claims are numerous misleading, fake and defamatory reviews posted about hotels and restaurants. The ASA has launched an investigation to see if claims that TripAdvisor makes which underpin its business – such as that it provides “trusted” advice and “real”, “honest” reviews from travellers – are in breach of the advertising code. “You’ll find real hotel reviews you can trust at TripAdvisor,” the company claims. “Millions of travellers like you have shared their honest reviews of hotels, B&Bs, inns, and more.” Under its remit the ASA cannot investigate the veracity of the reviews, but TripAdvisor will be forced to offer evidence to prove that its reviews are real and fair or the claims on its website will be deemed to be misleading and have to be removed. In its complaint to the ASA Kwikchex.com claimed that TripAdvisor does not verify any of the 50m reviews on its network of websites – the company operates 18 sites covering 27 countries – and therefore they are misleading and cannot be described as genuine. Last year KwikChex.com started talking to what has become thousands of businesses that believe they have been affected by malicious reviews, with the aim of confronting TripAdvisor with a threat of taking legal action if nothing is done. •
Continue reading …Thousands of hotels claim travel website does not check its reviews and many are therefore misleading, fake or defamatory TripAdvisor is to be investigated by the advertising watchdog after receiving a complaint on behalf of thousands of hotels that its claims to provide trustworthy and honest reviews from travellers are false. The Advertising Standards Authority has launched a formal investigation into TripAdvisor, the hugely popular travel review website that parent company Expedia intends to spin off as a separate business, after receiving a complaint from a company called KwikChex.com. Bournemouth-based KwikChex.com, which helps companies manage their online reputations, has been vigorously pursuing TripAdvisor since last year over what it claims are numerous misleading, fake and defamatory reviews posted about hotels and restaurants. The ASA has launched an investigation to see if claims that TripAdvisor makes which underpin its business – such as that it provides “trusted” advice and “real”, “honest” reviews from travellers – are in breach of the advertising code. “You’ll find real hotel reviews you can trust at TripAdvisor,” the company claims. “Millions of travellers like you have shared their honest reviews of hotels, B&Bs, inns, and more.” Under its remit the ASA cannot investigate the veracity of the reviews, but TripAdvisor will be forced to offer evidence to prove that its reviews are real and fair or the claims on its website will be deemed to be misleading and have to be removed. In its complaint to the ASA Kwikchex.com claimed that TripAdvisor does not verify any of the 50m reviews on its network of websites – the company operates 18 sites covering 27 countries – and therefore they are misleading and cannot be described as genuine. Last year KwikChex.com started talking to what has become thousands of businesses that believe they have been affected by malicious reviews, with the aim of confronting TripAdvisor with a threat of taking legal action if nothing is done. •
Continue reading …Juventus Lyrica | La Cenerentola | G. Rossini Juventus Lyrica | La Cenerentola | G. Rossini J Balvin – Como Yo ( Prod Dj Buxxi Dj Tra ) mido4all93 says: Lyrica – Pop Opera Fusion: http://t.co/3xwaBPh via @ AddThis
Continue reading …Cuts to school building partly to blame – although private sector housebuilding remains muted and shopping centre construction has almost ground to a halt The chancellor, George Osborne, is expected to come under renewed pressure from opposition politicians and business leaders to stimulate the economy after official figures revealed the sharpest fall in new orders for the construction industry since 1980. The Office for National Statistics found that new orders were 16.3% lower in the second quarter on the previous three months and 23.2% lower than in the same period last year. Analysts said they had been expecting the figures to show a slowdown across the construction sector – but were shocked by the sheer scale of the slump. Cuts to government school building along with other infrastructure projects were partly to blame, according to experts, though private sector housebuilding remains muted and the building of retail outlets and shopping centres has almost ground to a halt. Areas in the south and west were hardest hit – with north London, Bristol and the Medway in Kent suffering some of the largest falls. The north-east also suffered heavily – with new orders in Tyne and Wear dropping by almost half on the previous quarter. A survey of construction industry purchasing managers found a similar picture, with employment down for the third month in a row. The survey showed the sector was continuing to expand, albeit slowly, but with lower margins and confidence at its lowest for eight months. The PMI stood at an eight-month low of 52.6 in August from 53.5 in July and a 2011 peak of 56.5 in February. Double whammy Howard Archer, chief UK economist at IHS Global Insight, said the two surveys were a double whammy for the sector, which has yet to climb out of the slump triggered by the financial crisis. “There can be no doubt that the Bank of England will keep interest rates down at 0.5% at the September meeting of the MPC next week and for a considerable time to come thereafter. Furthermore, pressure is building for action to try and help the economy through more quantitative easing,” he said. The Labour party has called for short-term tax cuts to promote growth and prevent the economy slipping back into recession. Archer added: “While the purchasing managers’ survey does at least indicate that construction activity is still expanding, it shows output growth slowing, incoming new business at a seven-month low, employment in the sector contracting at an increased rate, squeezed margins and business expectations deteriorating. Meanwhile, the data from the ONS is horrible. This bodes ill for output prospects in the near term at least.” Construction industry Economics Phillip Inman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Turkish foreign minister says all military agreements are suspended after Israel refused to apologise for its flotilla raid Turkey says it is expelling the Israeli ambassador and cutting military ties with Israel over the country’s refusal to apologise for last year’s deadly raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla. The foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, said Turkey was downgrading diplomatic ties to the level of second secretary and the ambassador would leave Turkey by Wednesday. Davutoglu also said Turkey was suspending all military agreements signed between the former allies, saying “it is time Israel pays a price”. The long-awaited UN report on the raid, made public on Thursday , declared that Israel’s naval blockade of the Gaza Strip was legal, but that the Jewish state used unreasonable force. Davutoglu said some of the report’s findings were unacceptable. Turkey had earlier demanded an apology from Israel by the time the report was published. Israeli officials said the report did not demand an Israeli apology, establishing instead that Israel should express regret and pay reparations. An Israeli official said the report showed Israel’s actions were in keeping with international law. The official said Israel hoped the two countries could now “return to the co-operation that was a cornerstone of regional stability”. He spoke on condition of anonymity because the report had yet to be officially released. He said Israel expected it to be made public by the UN later on Friday. Relations between Turkey and Israel, once close, have slid in recent years as Turkey has tilted away from the west. They deteriorated sharply after the flotilla bloodshed. The UN report says: “Turkey and Israel should resume full diplomatic relations, repairing their relationship in the interests of stability in the Middle East and international peace and security,” according to the copy obtained by the New York Times. Turkey announced the expulsion of the Israeli ambassador and suspension of military co-operation hours before the report was to be published, the most significant downgrading in ties between the two countries since the bloody flotilla attack. A senior Israeli government official who had seen the report told AP earlier this week that Israel had come to believe Turkey was intent on worsening ties with Israel in order to bolster its own position in the Arab and Islamic world. While Israel does not rule out quiet talks with Turkey on an expression of regret and reparations to families of the dead activists, the report does not ask for an Israeli apology and there will not be one, he said. Nine pro-Palestinian activists – eight Turks and one Turkish-American – were killed aboard the Turkish-flagged ship Mavi Marmara on 31 May 2010 after passengers resisted a takeover by Israeli naval commandos. The flotilla was en route to Gaza in an attempt to bring international attention to Israel’s blockade of the Palestinian territory. Each side blamed the other, claiming self-defence. After the violence triggered an international outcry, Israel eased restrictions on goods moving into Gaza overland but left the naval blockade in place. The activists say the blockade constitutes collective punishment and is illegal. Israel asserts that it is necessary to prevent weapons from reaching the militants who regularly bombard Israeli towns with rockets from Gaza, which is ruled by the Islamist Hamas. The UN committee established in the aftermath of the incident was made up of two international diplomats – the former leaders of New Zealand and Colombia – one representative from Israel and one from Turkey. The report, as published by the New York Times, accepts Israel’s position that the naval blockade is a “legitimate security measure”. It acknowledges that Israel “faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza”. Participants in the flotilla, the committee wrote, “acted recklessly in attempting to breach the naval blockade”. Most passengers were peaceful, according to the report, but a small group was prepared for organised resistance. These passengers were “armed with iron bars, staves, chains and slingshots, and there is some indication that they also used knives”. After soldiers rappelled on to the deck from helicopters, according to the report, “three soldiers were captured, mistreated, and placed at risk by those passengers. Several others were wounded.” The report established, however, that Israel’s use of force was “excessive and unreasonable”. “No satisfactory explanation has been provided to the panel by Israel for any of the nine deaths,” according to the report as quoted by the paper. The committee noted “forensic evidence showing that most of the deceased were shot multiple times, including in the back, or at close range”. The senior Israeli government official said those hit in the back were attacking soldiers when they were shot from behind by other soldiers acting to save their comrades. Turkey Israel Gaza flotilla Gaza Palestinian territories Middle East Europe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A freshwater crocodile was found on Friday in a public swimming pool in Darwin, in Australia’s Northern Territory. A lifeguard removed the small croc and noone was hurt by the swimming reptile. (Sept. 2)
Continue reading …Las Vegas visitors can now get a bigger taste of a typical backyard sandbox. Dig This offers playtime in excavators and bulldozers. Starting at just over $200, kids and adults can climb in and move around huge piles of dirt. (Sept. 2)
Continue reading …