Home » Archives by category » News (Page 1414)
WiLAN lawyers up, picks patent fight with Apple, Dell, HP, HTC and others

You know what the tech world needs? More patent litigation, which is why WiLAN is at it again in the rocket docket of the Eastern District of Texas. This time, instead of suing cable companies , it’s going after the likes of Apple, Dell, HP, HTC, Kyocera, Novatel, Alcatel-Lucent and Sierra Wireless. There are two patents at issue: no. RE37,802 that covers CDMA and HSPA data transmission, and no. 5,282,222 which is related to data transmission tech with WiFi and LTE. Will the plucky patent troll get some quick cash, or will the big boys fight this one to the end? Stay tuned. WiLAN lawyers up, picks patent fight with Apple, Dell, HP, HTC and others originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
WiLAN lawyers up, picks patent fight with Apple, Dell, HP, HTC and others

You know what the tech world needs? More patent litigation, which is why WiLAN is at it again in the rocket docket of the Eastern District of Texas. This time, instead of suing cable companies , it’s going after the likes of Apple, Dell, HP, HTC, Kyocera, Novatel, Alcatel-Lucent and Sierra Wireless. There are two patents at issue: no. RE37,802 that covers CDMA and HSPA data transmission, and no. 5,282,222 which is related to data transmission tech with WiFi and LTE. Will the plucky patent troll get some quick cash, or will the big boys fight this one to the end? Stay tuned. WiLAN lawyers up, picks patent fight with Apple, Dell, HP, HTC and others originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:14:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Police officers should commute in uniforms, suggests thinktank

Policy Exchange says move would reassure public, but police organisation dismisses idea as dangerous and impractical Police officers should wear their uniforms to and from work to help reassure the public, a leading right-of-centre thinktank has said. Policy Exchange, which has links with leading Conservatives, suggested the move would be the equivalent of having 12,000 officers on the streets. But the idea could put police officers and their families in danger and would be impractical, said the Police Federation , which represents rank-and-file officers in England and Wales. It said the thinktank’s idea did not take into consideration the risks to officers as they left their homes. In a report , Policy Exchange thinktank suggested millions of pounds could be saved if more civilian staff did back-office work currently performed by more expensively trained officers. Blair Gibbs, head of crime and justice at Policy Exchange, told the BBC’s Today programme at least £500m had been spent since 2006 in extra employment costs for 7,000 police officers who were not currently in policing roles. “It is vital that forces look at the use of officers and make sure they are deployed properly,” he said. “There remains a clear gap between additional police resources and the service delivered. As far as the public are concerned, the unprecedented expansion in officer numbers since 2001 may as well never have happened.” Peter Fahy, head of workforce development at the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and chief constable of Greater Manchester police, said paying civilians to do more work was politically sensitive because it would mean fewer officers. “It is crucially important the police officers are used in roles which require their expertise, powers and experience,” he said. “That said, this doesn’t just apply to the frontline, there are many office-based jobs where police officers are required, including handling intelligence, delivering training, or processing offenders through the criminal justice system.” The idea of officers wearing their uniforms on the way to work was “a bit of a red herring”, he said. “Most officers travel to work now in cars, I’m not sure how many of the public would see it. If you’re an officer and you’re trying to deal with an incident, even on a bus or a tube [when] you’re on your way to work and you don’t have your radio and protective equipment, then that is an issue. Our officers already make huge numbers of off-duty arrests. There is an obligation on every police officer, on duty or off duty, to intervene if they see something.” The Policy Exchange report, Cost of the Cops: Manpower and deployment in policing, said police forces in England and Wales wasted almost £150m a year because one in 20 officers did roles that could be performed by civilians. The report found that since 2000, funding for the police in England and Wales had risen by 25% in real terms. In 2010, the average household paid £614 per year for policing, up from £395 in 2001. It suggested forces should consider single patrols, rather than officers working in pairs. Police Thinktanks Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libya: closing in on Gaddafi’s Bani Walid stronghold – live updates

• Rebel commander demands UK apology over rendition • Talks fail on the surrender of besieged Gaddafi town • Red Cross chief visits Syria amid continuing crackdown 9.21am: Libya’s new civilian leaders are concerned that military commanders like Abdul Hakim Belhaj, a former leader of a dissident Islamist group who is planning to sue the British government over his rendition, are getting too big for their boots. The Washington Post reports that moves to rein in his influence by bringing the military commanders under one committee headed by the deputy prime minister Ali Tarhouni. Mohammed Benrasali, a senior official in the Libya Stabilization Committee and a member of the Misrata city council, said the move was largely designed to rein in Belhadj, whose past as a fighter in Afghanistan was seen as something of a public relations problem for a government seeking substantial Western backing. “Mr. Belhaj is getting too big for his shoes,” Benrasali said. “We needed someone to rein him in.” 9.08am: Disputed allegations about Iran’s links with al-Qaida have resurfaced in Libyan documents discovered by the Daily Telegraph . Iran has repeatedly denied official involvement with al-Qaida . The Telegraph said the Libyan documents don’t challenge the Iranian government, but do suggest that al-Qaida operatives had more freedom of movement there than previously thought. 8.34am: Welcome to Middle East Live. There are two key things to watch today: the continuing fallout from the discovery of documents detailing UK and US collaboration with the Gaddafi regime in the rendition of terrorism suspects; and the rebel’s next move on the besieged town of Bani Walid after the apparent failure of peace talks with Gaddafi loyalists. Here are the main developments in more detail: Libya • Abdul Hakim Belhaj, commander of the anti-Gaddafi militia, is considering suing the British government after documents emerged appearing to show UK involvement in his rendition and subsequent torture. Speaking to the Guardian he said: “I wasn’t allowed a bath for three years and I didn’t see the sun for one year. They hung me from the wall and kept me in an isolation cell. I was regularly tortured … This will not stop the new Libya having orderly relations with the United States and Britain. But it did not need to happen.” • British intelligence agencies mounted their own “rendition” operation in collaboration with Gaddafi’s security services, the newly discovered Tripoli papers suggest. A secret CIA document found among the haul shows that the British and Libyans worked together to arrange for a terrorism suspect to be removed from Hong Kong to Tripoli – along with his wife and children – despite the risk that they would be tortured. The wording of the document suggests the CIA was not involved in the planning of the rendition operation. • David Cameron is expected to make a statement in the Commons about Libya at around 3.30pm. Andrew Sparrow will be reporting on the political fallout on the rendition allegations on our Politics live blog. • Rebels are poised for an assault on Bani Walid after the failure of talks aimed at securing the surrender of Gaddafi loyalists. Abusif Ghnyah, a rebel spokesman who comes from Bani Walid, said 120 people gathered in the town last week and agreed a negotiated surrender, only for the meeting to be disrupted by Gaddafi loyalists. • Rebel leaders in the nearby town of Tahouna said loyalist convoys had been seen leaving Bani Walid after residents raised rebels flags. Rebels were planning to send forays into town to test the mood of the people. •  China offered to sell the Gaddafi government large stockpiles of weapons and ammunition in apparent violation of United Nations sanctions. Documents obtained by Canada’s the Globe and Mail show that state-controlled Chinese arms manufacturers were prepared to sell weapons and ammunition worth at least $200-million to Gaddafi in late July. Syria • The head of the Red Cross, Jakob Kellenberger, is to to meet Bashar al-Assad as activists report another 14 deaths in the latest crackdown against anti government protests. The government said nine people were killed by “armed gangs”. • Government forces have  launched a massive manhunt for Adnan Muhammad al-Bakkour, the attorney general of Hama, who defected to the opposition last week, residents and activists told the LA Times. Bakkour appeared in videos last week in which he said he had resigned because of a massive government campaign of killing and torture in Hama. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest CIA rendition MI6 US foreign policy Middle East al-Qaida Syria Bashar Al-Assad Israel Bahrain Algeria Nato Iran Egypt Hosni Mubarak Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Tahiti

No Comment
Tahiti

LMFAO, Lauren Bennett & Goon Rock – Party Rock Anthem (DJ Memphis Electro House Remix) tahiti 19 dansedufeu 2 tahiti 16 visage JesssAltieri says: Oh the things I’d do to go to tahiti

Continue reading …
Vulli Sophie the Giraffe Teether

Type: Baby Product Title: Vulli Sophie the Giraffe Teether See all customer reviews Features: Phthalates and BPA free Facilitate baby development Numerous parts to chew and play safely Made of 100% natural rubber and food paint See the details

Continue reading …
Stock markets fall again as IMF chief warns of crisis

• FTSE 100 opens more than 100 points lower • Banks and miners see big falls, RBS down 7.4% • Lagarde calls for recapitalisation of Europe’s banks • Weak US jobs data still worrying traders Fears of a new global recession sent stock markets falling sharply across Europe and Asia on Monday morning, after International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde warned that the world economy is on the brink of a new crisis. In London, the FTSE 100 fell 101.33 points at the start of trading to 5190, down 1.9%. Germany’s Dax fell 2.3%, and France’s CAC index dropped 2.5%. There was also a rush to dump shares in Asia, where Japan’s Nikkei closed 1.86% lower at 8,784.46 points and South Korea’s Seoul Composite index slid by 4.39%. This latest selloff came after Lagarde said the risk of a new financial crisis had grown in recent weeks. “We see that there has been, particularly over the summer, a clear crisis of confidence that has seriously aggravated the situation,” she told Germany’s Spiegel . “Measures need to be taken to ensure that this vicious circle is broken.” Lagarde warned that Europe’s banks needed to be recapitalised, to give them protection from losses on their reserves of sovereign debt. The former French finance minister also argued that Europe needs to implement closer fiscal union and speed up its economic growth – which has almost ground to a halt. “The sovereign debt issue weighs on the confidence that market players have in European banks,” Lagarde said. Financial stocks and miners led the fallers in London. Royal Bank of Scotland slid 7.4% to 22.2p, Barclays fell 5.5% at 155p, and Antofagasta and Kazakhmys both fell by 4%. The UK banks were buffeted by uncertainty over whether they will be forced to ringfence their retail and investment banking operations . The rush from equities into “safe-haven” government bonds pushed the interest rate on German Bunds to just 1.935%. Concerns over the weak US jobs market also dogged investors, following the shock news late last week that no new jobs were created in America last month . Chris Weston, institutional trader at IG Markets, said Friday’s disappointing non-farm payroll numbers continued to cast a shadow. “That US non-farm payroll reading certainly left traders with little to celebrate on Friday, pushing markets on both sides of the Atlantic sharply lower as a result. This has certainly set the pace for Asian markets too and with Wall Street closed today for Labor Day, it seems unlikely that there will be much appetite to start taking on any risk just yet,” said Weston. “Even those who thought a dire jobs report would pave the way for another round of cheap money in the form of QE3 seem to be cooling on the idea – or at least any hope that it’ll provide the same shot-in-the-arm response for equity markets.” Stock markets Financial crisis Global recession Banking Christine Lagarde IMF Global economy European banks Europe Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Today in History for September 5th

Highlights of this day in history: A massacre at the Munich Olympics; President Gerald Ford escapes the first of two assassination attempts, weeks apart; Jack Kerouac’s ‘On the Road’ published; Missionary nun Mother Teresa dies. (Sept. 5)

Continue reading …
Stateless misery on India-Bangladesh border

Thirteen years ago Saifur Rahman had a severe injury to his eyes and was taken to a hospital in northern Bangladesh. But doctors refused to treat him, saying he was a…

Continue reading …
Is the Obama Administration Putting Corporate Profits Above Public Health?

One reason I supported President Obama is because he said we must protect clean air, water and lands. But what good is it to say the right thing unless you act on it? Since early August, three administration decisions — on Arctic drilling, the Keystone XL pipeline and the ozone that causes smog — have all favored dirty industry over public health and a clean environment. Like so many others, I’m beginning to wonder just where the man stands. For months, the Environmental Protection Agency has been poised to issue new ozone rules to reduce the smog that causes asthma attacks and other respiratory ills. We badly need these new standards, which the EPA estimates could prevent 12,000 premature deaths a year. On Friday, though, the White House put the new rules on ice. The result: these vital protections will be delayed until at least 2013 – conveniently after next year’s presidential election. The week before, the State Department gave a preliminary green light to the proposed Keystone XL, a pipeline that would carry crude oil from Canadian tar sands to Texas refineries. If this pipeline wins final approval from the administration in the coming months, it will wed our energy future to the dirtiest oil on the planet. It will invest this country in one of the most destructive mining practices ever devised. And it will put farmers, ranchers and cropland at risk across the great plains of the American heartland. That’s why the Republican governor of Nebraska came out against it this week. And just last month, the Interior Department gave conditional approval to Shell Oil’s plan to begin drilling four exploratory wells in the Arctic waters off of Alaska’s North Slope as early as next summer. Congress has yet to pass a single law strengthening offshore drilling safeguards in the wake of last year’s BP blowout, and we’re giving Shell the go-ahead to drill in some of the nation’s most fertile fishing grounds, in waters that are iced in eight months each year and in a location a five-day journey by ship from the nearest Coast Guard station. What’s going on here? In all three cases, the administration’s decisions have come in the face of a withering industry lobbying campaign based on the usual mix of fear mongering and lies. With our economy staggering and unemployment at 9.1 percent, some of the biggest corporate polluters in the country and their allies in Congress are suddenly talking about jobs. Lobbyists from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and other powerful corporate interests have spent the summer pressuring the White House to kick new smog standards down the road. If we have to clean up the mess we make, they say, we won’t hire any new workers. Really? American companies can’t hire workers unless they’re allowed to make our air so dirty our people get sick, miss work and die? That’s nonsense. Companies hire workers to fill orders for their products and services. Cleaning up after themselves is a cost of doing business, and it’s a necessary cost. This isn’t about jobs; it’s about profits. The fact is, federal safeguards for public health, worker safety and our environment generated up to $655 billion in measurable economic benefits over just the past decade, at a cost to industry of $62 billion — at most — according to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Even on a strict economic analysis, in other words, the national benefits of federal safeguards outweigh costs by more than 10 to 1. Read the report for yourself. I want our smog levels to come down so more of our children and seniors can breathe clean air. Putting corporate profits above public health is unconscionable. It’s outrageous that it would be countenanced — by this president or any other. Similarly on Keystone XL, this is a terrible idea for the country. It needs to be stopped. That’s the message more than 1,000 concerned Americans have delivered directly to Obama, through White House demonstrations over the past two weeks. If you want to help, click here. Because the pipeline would cross our border with Canada, it’s an international project that can’t go forward without a presidential determination that it’s in our national interest. It’s not. It’s in the interest of big oil companies. When you check, though, you find they’re doing okay. They piled up profits topping $67 billion in just the first six months of this year. I’m all for profits. But not when they come from something as destructive as tar sands. Already in the Boreal forests of Alberta, tar sands production has made a strip mine of an area the size of Orlando, Fla. It’s scarred and poisoned, perhaps forever. The Keystone XL would cut through parts of Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma en route to the Gulf ports of Houston and Port Arthur, Tx. It would expose our heartland to the kinds of ruptures and blowouts that just in the past year have brought disaster to the Yellowstone River, the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. I was reminded of those disasters three weeks ago, when the administration gave a conditional go-ahead to Shell’s plan to drill in the Arctic. Instead of going to the ends of the earth to feed our national addiction to oil, and putting irreplaceable waters, habitat and even the American breadbasket at risk, we need to invest in the clean energy strategies of tomorrow. That’s the way to put Americans back to work, developing renewable sources of power and fuel and building the next generation of energy efficient cars, homes and workplaces. President Obama has done a lot to protect public health and our environment. He’s championed clean-energy investments, high-speed rail and cuts in the carbon emissions that are warming our planet. He’s promoted efficiency gains in home and commercial appliances that will save us all billions of dollars each year. And the agreement he reached earlier this summer on vehicle gas mileage goals will cut our oil use by a breathtaking three million barrels a day by 2030. Those are all positive steps and strong. But we have to keep moving forward. This is no time to turn back from the progress we need. I have to believe that President Obama still knows it’s important to protect clean air, water and lands. Like so many, I’m waiting for him to stand up for all that. I’m waiting for him to stand up for our future. But we can’t wait forever.

Continue reading …