Planning row between Suffolk villagers escalates to court case after doll put on display in window It began as a planning dispute between affluent neighbours in a Suffolk village, but resulted in the arrest of a woman accused of racially aggravated harassment after she displayed a golliwog in the window of her house. Jena Mason will appear before Lowestoft magistrates on Tuesday, Suffolk police said. The 65-year-old was arrested after her black neighbour, Rosemarie O’Donnell, complained about the doll. It appeared in the only window visible from the home of O’Donnell and her husband, Stephen, the couple said, after the disagreement over planning permission got out of hand. The row between the neighbours in the village of Worlingham started after Mason and her husband, Terry, who live in a 16th century manor house, applied for permission to build new stables on their land. Their son-in-law, who also lives in the manor house, is in training for the British Olympic dressage team and is understood to need the space for his horses. The O’Donnells, who live in a £1m barn conversion next door, hired a planning consultant to challenge the application, arguing that it would lead to an increase in traffic and boundary and right of way issues as well as raising the question of how organic waste from the horses would be disposed of. A golliwog then appeared on a ground-floor window sill in the Masons’ house, near the main entrance to the barn. Rosemarie O’Donnell, a 48-year-old businesswoman with Jamaican roots, said the doll was an affront to her and her two mixed-race children, and the sight of it had left her “shocked and upset”. She took a photograph of the doll and – days after planning permission for the new stables was granted by the local council – gave it to police and made a formal complaint. A police spokeswoman said: “We have had a complaint from a member of the public, we have investigated it and both the Crown Prosecution Service and ourselves have agreed there is enough to prosecute.” James Hartley, Mason’s solicitor, said his client was “devastated by what was going on” and intended to plead not guilty because the golliwog had ended up on the window shelf as she was tidying up her grandson’s toys. “It is an innocent act which has been interpreted in a completely different way,” he said. “She does not accept that she acted in a racial manner. It is a large house, and she lives there with other members of her family and there is a grandson who is 16 months old. She was tidying up the toys.” Mason is currently on bail and faces a penalty of up to £2,500 if found guilty of the offence. On Wednesday, O’Donnell’s 54-year-old husband, an IT executive, said the couple had had a number of disputes with the Masons over the stable plans and the Masons’ dogs, but dismissed the claim that the golliwog had been accidentally put on display. “It’s not a children’s toy,” he told the Daily Mail. “You can see it has buttons and other items on it. It was clearly deliberately placed on the window sill facing out of the window. I do not believe it was casually tossed up there. It has caused immense upset. You live in the countryside and you think you have got away from all this nonsense.” The couple moved to Manor Farm Barn, a five-bedroom conversion, in 2003 from Kent. Race issues Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Former News of the World editor cites concern about ‘parallel inquiries’ and ‘publicity’ Andy Coulson, the former editor of the News of the World and the prime minister’s former personal communications director, is reportedly refusing to appear before the Commons select committee that is investigating phone-hacking. His solicitors have written to the culture, media and sport committee declining an invitation to appear citing “concerns” about “parallel inquiries and investigations and the publicity generated by them”. Coulson resigned from the News International paper in 2007 after its former royal editor Clive Goodman was jailed on phone-hacking offences. He has consistently denied knowing that phone hacking took place but last month a previously unseen letter from Goodman emerged that claimed phone hacking was “widely discussed” at editorial conferences until Coulson banned mentions of it. Goodman’s letter also claimed that Coulson had offered to let him keep his job if he agreed not to implicate the paper in hacking when it came to court. The chairman of select committee, John Whittingdale, wrote to Coulson the day this letter was released into the public domain, inviting him to consider whether his previous denials of knowledge of phone hacking should be amended. Coulson’s solicitors at law firm DLA Piper reportedly said in their reply to Whittingdale: “We have expressed our concerns to you previously about the effects of the parallel inquiries and investigations and the publicity generated by them. Given those concerns … our client does not wish to make any additional comments on the evidence he gave to the committee.” DLA Piper refused to comment. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Andy Coulson Phone hacking Clive Goodman News of the World News International John Whittingdale National newspapers Newspapers Newspapers & magazines Lisa O’Carroll guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Reports are now suggesting that President Obama will propose a $300 billion effort to jump-start the economy when he delivers a policy address before both houses of Congress tomorrow night. As we wrote yesterday, the package will likely include a mix of payroll tax cuts–an extension of the one now in place for employees, and
Continue reading …Michael Fassbender discusses his new found interest in sexual addiction while the film’s director, Steve McQueen, comments on his star’s ‘believability’. (Sept. 7)
Continue reading …The Associated Press recently viewed about two dozen of Elizabeth Taylor’s most iconic pieces at Christie’s auction house, which is selling her complete jewelry collection, valued at $30 million, in New York on December 13 (September 7)
Continue reading …PERUGIA, Italy — An Italian court rejected a prosecutor’s request Wednesday for new testing of crucial DNA evidence in the appeals trial of Amanda Knox – a positive development for the American student who is seeking to overturn her murder conviction. The decision to deny more DNA testing was a blow to the prosecution, which had sought to counter the results of a court-ordered independent review that harshly criticized how genetic evidence was used in the case. Without a clear motive or convincing witnesses, the DNA evidence is crucial, and much of the appeals outcome hinges on it. The court presided over by Judge Claudio Pratillo Hellmann also set closing arguments to begin Sept. 23, with the prosecution going first, followed by civil plaintiffs and the defense. A verdict is expected by the end of September. Knox was convicted in December 2009 of sexually assaulting and murdering her British roommate Meredith Kercher while they were studying in Perugia and sentenced to 26 years; Raffaele Sollecito, an Italian who was Knox’s boyfriend at the time, also was convicted and sentenced to 25 years. Both deny wrongdoing and are appealing the lower court’s verdict. In the first trial, prosecutors maintained that Knox’s DNA was found on the handle of a kitchen knife believed to be the murder weapon, and that Kercher’s DNA was found on the blade. They said Sollecito’s DNA was on the clasp of Kercher’s bra as part of a mixed trace that also included the victim’s genetic profile. The appeals court ordered an independent review – as sought by the defense – which found that much of that evidence was unreliable and possibly contaminated. The review was at the center of several fiercely debated hearings in the Perugia courtroom, with police defending their investigation. Pratillo Hellmann said the discussion had been thorough enough for the court to form an opinion. New testing would be “superfluous,” he said, rejecting the request made earlier in the day by Prosecutor Manuela Comodi. The court also rejected another prosecution request to put back on the stand a witness who had previously testified that his brother, a fugitive, had killed Kercher during a botched burglary. The witness, a jailed Naples mobster called Luciano Aviello, announced he wanted to retract and was questioned by Comodi in prison in July. The court ruled that transcriptions of that questioning would suffice. Curt Knox, the defendant’s father, said he was pleased with the court’s decision. “It shows the judge and the jury believed in what the independent experts have brought back to them,” he told reporters. “It’s really kind of a desperation move on the prosecution to ask for another independent review that they originally were totally against.” Knox has said his 24-year-old daughter is anxious as the trial draws to a close, but also that she’s seeing “the light at the end of the tunnel.” “Hopefully we’ll get to take Amanda home,” he said. Curt Knox is expected to be joined by Knox’s mother, Edda Mellas, for the last stage of the trial. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kerchers, said the family would come to Perugia for the verdict, as they did in the first trial. Just days ago, the family released a letter to express “great concern” over recent DNA evidence findings, asking the court to assess “every single (piece) of evidence, both scientific and circumstantial, as well as any witnesses who have taken the stand independently of any other information or media.” Kercher was found stabbed to death on Nov. 2, 2007 in the apartment she shared with Knox. She had been murdered the night before, according to forensic police. A third person, Rudy Hermann Guede of the Ivory Coast, also has been convicted of Kercher’s murder in a separate proceeding. Italy’s highest criminal court has upheld Guede’s conviction and his 16-year-prison sentence. Guede denies wrongdoing.
Continue reading …Comedian falls behind schedule in 140-mile swim for Sport Relief but has still raised more than £200,000 David Walliams is falling behind schedule in his charity river swim after coming down with “Thames tummy”. The comedian has been ill with a high temperature, vomiting and diarrhoea but has still managed to raise more than £200,000 for Sport Relief three days into his challenge. He said: “I always knew there was a risk that taking in the water could cause problems, but now it’s happened it’s still hit me really hard. I was sweating in the night and have been to the toilet a lot this morning. This is already much harder than I thought it would be… and London seems a long way away.” The Little Britain star, 40, is swimming 140 miles over eight days from Gloucestershire to London. David Walliams Swimming Charities Swimming guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Comedian falls behind schedule in 140-mile swim for Sport Relief but has still raised more than £200,000 David Walliams is falling behind schedule in his charity river swim after coming down with “Thames tummy”. The comedian has been ill with a high temperature, vomiting and diarrhoea but has still managed to raise more than £200,000 for Sport Relief three days into his challenge. He said: “I always knew there was a risk that taking in the water could cause problems, but now it’s happened it’s still hit me really hard. I was sweating in the night and have been to the toilet a lot this morning. This is already much harder than I thought it would be… and London seems a long way away.” The Little Britain star, 40, is swimming 140 miles over eight days from Gloucestershire to London. David Walliams Swimming Charities Swimming guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed will appear in court on Friday, charged with the murder of their daughter The parents of Shafilea Ahmed, the victim of a suspected “honour killing” almost eight years ago, have been charged with murder and appeared before magistrates on Wednesday. Ahmed, 17, disappeared from her home town of Warrington, Cheshire, in September 2003. Her badly decomposed remains were found in February 2004 on the banks of the River Kent in Cumbria, following a flood. She was an intelligent young woman who had hoped to study law at university and become a solicitor. Her inquest heard that the most likely cause of death was strangulation or suffocation. Police said Iftikhar Ahmed, 51, a taxi driver, and Farzana Ahmed, 48, a housewife, of Liverpool Road, Warrington, were arrested on suspicion of murder in September 2010. Cheshire police have now charged both with murder following authorisation by the Crown Prosecution Service. The couple made a six-minute appearance at Halton magistrates’ court in Runcorn, Cheshire, on Wednesday afternoon. They were remanded in custody until Friday, when they will appear via videolink at Manchester crown court. They spoke only to confirm through an interpreter their names, ages and address. The murder charge was put to them, but no plea was entered. There were no submissions made by the prosecution or defence solicitors. The court heard that the couple were charged with murdering the teenager on 11 September 2003 in Cheshire. Iftikhar Ahmed, wearing an open-necked white shirt, gave family members a thumbs-up as he was taken down from the dock. His wife, who spoke through an interpreter, was on the verge of tears. During the hearing Mrs Ahmed stood with her head to one side, and wiped her nose. As she left the dock she signalled to members of her family in the public gallery with a raised finger. At the inquest into Shafilea’s death, Ian Smith, the coroner for south and east Cumbria, recorded a verdict of unlawful killing. The couple have always strenuously denied any involvement in their daughter’s death and once stormed into a police press conference to tearfully protest their innocence, claiming the police were racially motivated. But at the inquest, evidence was heard that Shafilea claimed she was held down and beaten by her parents and was fearful of an arranged marriage. The coroner ruled that she had been the victim of a “very vile murder”. She disappeared shortly after a trip to Pakistan in which she was introduced to a potential suitor. During the trip, she drank bleach and harmed herself in an apparent cry for help, and needed regular hospital treatment to correct injuries to her throat. The coroner said: “Shafilea was the victim of a very vile murder and there’s no evidence before the court as to who did it. There are things people know that have not been told to this court.” He said Shafilea had not had justice. “Her ambition was to live her own life in her own way: to study, to follow a career in the law and to do what she wanted to do. These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her.” Mrs Ahmed was remanded to Styal prison in Cheshire and her husband was remanded to Liverpool prison. The couple were initially arrested on suspicion of kidnapping their daughter in December 2003 but in June 2004 were released without charge when the Crown Prosecution Service ruled there was insufficient evidence against them. Crime Helen Carter guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Iftikhar and Farzana Ahmed will appear in court on Friday, charged with the murder of their daughter The parents of Shafilea Ahmed, the victim of a suspected “honour killing” almost eight years ago, have been charged with murder and appeared before magistrates on Wednesday. Ahmed, 17, disappeared from her home town of Warrington, Cheshire, in September 2003. Her badly decomposed remains were found in February 2004 on the banks of the River Kent in Cumbria, following a flood. She was an intelligent young woman who had hoped to study law at university and become a solicitor. Her inquest heard that the most likely cause of death was strangulation or suffocation. Police said Iftikhar Ahmed, 51, a taxi driver, and Farzana Ahmed, 48, a housewife, of Liverpool Road, Warrington, were arrested on suspicion of murder in September 2010. Cheshire police have now charged both with murder following authorisation by the Crown Prosecution Service. The couple made a six-minute appearance at Halton magistrates’ court in Runcorn, Cheshire, on Wednesday afternoon. They were remanded in custody until Friday, when they will appear via videolink at Manchester crown court. They spoke only to confirm through an interpreter their names, ages and address. The murder charge was put to them, but no plea was entered. There were no submissions made by the prosecution or defence solicitors. The court heard that the couple were charged with murdering the teenager on 11 September 2003 in Cheshire. Iftikhar Ahmed, wearing an open-necked white shirt, gave family members a thumbs-up as he was taken down from the dock. His wife, who spoke through an interpreter, was on the verge of tears. During the hearing Mrs Ahmed stood with her head to one side, and wiped her nose. As she left the dock she signalled to members of her family in the public gallery with a raised finger. At the inquest into Shafilea’s death, Ian Smith, the coroner for south and east Cumbria, recorded a verdict of unlawful killing. The couple have always strenuously denied any involvement in their daughter’s death and once stormed into a police press conference to tearfully protest their innocence, claiming the police were racially motivated. But at the inquest, evidence was heard that Shafilea claimed she was held down and beaten by her parents and was fearful of an arranged marriage. The coroner ruled that she had been the victim of a “very vile murder”. She disappeared shortly after a trip to Pakistan in which she was introduced to a potential suitor. During the trip, she drank bleach and harmed herself in an apparent cry for help, and needed regular hospital treatment to correct injuries to her throat. The coroner said: “Shafilea was the victim of a very vile murder and there’s no evidence before the court as to who did it. There are things people know that have not been told to this court.” He said Shafilea had not had justice. “Her ambition was to live her own life in her own way: to study, to follow a career in the law and to do what she wanted to do. These are just basic fundamental rights and they were denied to her.” Mrs Ahmed was remanded to Styal prison in Cheshire and her husband was remanded to Liverpool prison. The couple were initially arrested on suspicion of kidnapping their daughter in December 2003 but in June 2004 were released without charge when the Crown Prosecution Service ruled there was insufficient evidence against them. Crime Helen Carter guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …