Home » Archives by category » News (Page 1267)
Andy Murray v John Isner – live! | Rob Smyth

• Hit F5 for the latest or select the auto-refresh button below • And email your thoughts to rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk 5.32pm “I hate all this nonsense about Murray not having the winning mentality (invariably said by journalists or pub pundits who – like me – have won nothing of significance in their lives),” says Jonathan Wood. “Absolutely he has, and he’s comfortably the fourth best player in the world – which is more than any British footballer or rubgy player can claim to be. And Darren Holliday might be interested to know that on US TV last night, that former choker John McEnroe (who is also a huge Murray fan, of course) said he believes, with the current top four, this is the golden age for men’s tennis.” 5.30pm Here come the players. It’s a gorgeous day in New York, although the court is barely half full at the moment. 5.13pm No sign of the players. Here’s Darren Holliday. “You wrote: ‘ As my colleague Jacob Steinberg has noted, Murray has the misfortune to be playing in an age when excellence is not enough. You have to be perfect ,’” says Darren. “But as a tennis fan I can tell you that this era of Federer/Nadal/Djokovic is no more special than any other era. Back in Henman’s time the excuse was that he was unfortunate to be playing at the same time as Sampras/Agassi. Go back a bit earlier and people will tell you the Becker/Edberg/Lendl was the greatest of eras. Go back a few more years we had the Borg/McEnroe/Connors era. Murray has no excuse other than that he is not good enough to win a Slam and would not have been good enough in earlier times either. As you know being a Man Utd fan, being champion isn’t just about technical ability, it’s a state of mind. This Murray lacks most of all and it has nothing to do with this era of tennis being particularly special.” Look, as will soon become apparent, I have no idea what I’m talking about. But wasn’t the spread of grand slams much greater in those previous eras? Isn’t Del Potro the only other man to win one in the last five or six years? I do share the view that Murray will never win a slam, although I don’t entirely agree with your reasoning. Play will start just after 5pm . When I say ‘play’, I mean ‘the match’. I’m not from round these tennis parts, and I’m not really used to the terminology, so please forgive me if I confuse a backhand with a hook shot and a forehand with a DDT. Preamble Who’d be Andy Murray, eh? Anyone with a brain, obviously. What’s not to love? He has an admirable temper on him and doesn’t suffer Englishmen gladly. He’s also talented, smart, humble, funny and self-deprecating – genuinely so, rather than those execrable phonies all over Twitter and society who have swallowed their Peep Show boxset. But Murray is in a pretty unenviable position when it comes to grand slams. If he loses to one of the top three, he’s failed; if he loses to someone outside the top three, he’s really failed. I suppose he could win the darn thing , but you try beating two of Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic in the space of 72 hours. Or even taking a set off one of them. As my colleague Jacob Steinberg has noted, Murray has the misfortune to be playing in an age when excellence is not enough. You have to be perfect. If Murray beats the dangerous John Isner today, he will meet Rafael Nadal or Andy Roddick in the last four. He will also have reached the semi-finals of the four grand slams for the first time in a calendar year, a feat that has only ever been achieved by six men. Yet nobody will care about that if the semis are as far as he goes. US Open 2011 US Open tennis Tennis Andy Murray Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Artists rally around Cameroonian playwright facing deportation

Lydia Besong asylum claim rejected before raid, campaigners including Juliet Stevenson claim in criticism of UK Border Agency The forced deportation of a Cameroonian playwright and her husband, scheduled for Saturday, is “disturbing, shocking and unjust”, the actor Juliet Stephenson said yesterday. The actor joined campaigners including writers Joan Bakewell and Andrea Levy in condemning the UK Border Agency , which they say has disregarded its own procedures . Lydia Besong – who has written three plays since coming to the UK in 2006 – was not in her Manchester house when it was raided at dawn on Monday this week, but her husband Bernard Batey was taken by UKBA officers and has since been detained at the Colnbrook Removal Centre , near Heathrow airport. Besong has gone into hiding, with the couple both scheduled to take a flight to Cameroon at 8pm on Saturday. The couple had filed a fresh, joint asylum claim with new evidence given to UKBA in July but were not told it had been rejected before their house was raided. Documents from UKBA, that were subsequently faxed to the couples’ lawyer, reveal that the decision to refuse further submissions was taken on 17 August. The couple have also been supported by Ali Smith, Sarah Waters, Lisa Appignanesi, Linda Grant and writers’ group English Pen Stephenson, who hosted the first production of Besong’s play How I Became An Asylum Seeker , said the playwright was a “remarkable” woman. “It is just appalling. Lydia Besong is an incredibly courageous woman who has been imprisoned and raped in her own country and then has put her head above the parapet to talk about her experience and write her plays. To snatch her without giving her to prepare a defence is legally indefensible and humanly abusive and unjust,” she said. Broadcaster and member of House of Lords Lady Bakewell said: “Officers arriving at 7am does smack of bullying, and I don’t like that.” In a letter to immigration minister Damian Green urging him to consider their case she wrote: “As concerns about differing loyalties in Libya make the headlines, protesters such as Lydia and Besong from Cameroon need to be heard. Perhaps in years to come they may be leaders of some Cameroon ‘spring’ and in a position to judge how they were treated by Her Majesty’s government.” The couple say they were imprisoned and tortured in Cameroon as punishment for their involvement with the SBNC, a pressure group which campaigns for independence for southern Cameroon. While in prison, Besong was raped by a prison guard, she said. The pair believe their lives would be in danger if they returned to Cameroon, especially after Besong’s play garnered negative media coverage in their home country. Kath Grant of Manchester-based human rights organisation Rapar said the move contravened UKBA own procedures. “We are shocked at the behaviour of the UKBA. They have known about this decision for almost a month but have failed to inform Lydia and Bernard, or their lawyer.” An Amnesty International report in May confirmed that the regime of President Paul Biya continues to persecute the SCNC. “Lydia and Bernard will be in grave danger if they are returned to Cameroon,” said Grant. A spokesman from UKBA said the couple had been in 2006 and had no legal basis to remain in the country. “Decisions not to inform applicants of the outcome of their representations in advance will be taken where we believe individuals may deliberately seek to frustrate or delay the removal process,” he said. Speaking from an undisclosed location Lydia Besong said she feared for her life and that of her husband. “We are members of the SCNC in Cameroon, we have been targeted and put in detention. When the UKBA came for us on Monday it was like when [the government] came for us in Cameroon. I thought we would be safe in the UK, I did not think we would be put in a situation where I am not safe to go home.” The English literature graduate, who was a teacher in Cameroon, said writing plays in the UK had been a positive experience for her, but had put her in further danger. “Many people have opinions about asylum seekers and I hope my play helped them see that we are people and give them the truth. If I get sent back to Cameroon I will not be able to write any longer, I will be persecuted.” Cameroon Africa Theatre Immigration and asylum Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Clinton: Terror Threat ‘continuing Reminder’

In a speech at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says the United States cannot afford to live in fear, sacrifice its values, or “pull back from the world.” (Sept. 9)

Continue reading …
Bloomberg: 9/11 Memorial Offers Lasting Legacy

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says he hopes the September 11th memorial will still offer lessons to the city and the world a hundred years from now, and that today’s leaders will be remembered for making the right decisions. (Sept. 9)

Continue reading …
Another Odd Bachmann Rebuttal: ‘I’ve Been Part of the Real World Throughout My Life’

Click here to view this media Speaking to reporters at a sparsely attended press conference Thursday, Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann delivered a response to President Barack Obama’s jobs speech. “Even if the President’s plan passes, we already know it will fail,” she said, offering her own nine-point plan . During questions, Bachmann told reporters that her response to the president was not “campaign related.” “This is the president who called 535 members of Congress to hear what I believe was nothing more than political speech,” she remarked. “It’s an unfortunate plan the president has put forward because it is a plan in all likelihood, that will fail.” “It is so misguided of the President to just put forward a retread of everything he has put forward before that has failed,” Bachmann asserted. “This is clearly the President not listening to the American people.” “You don’t create jobs until you grow the economy. That’s how it works in the real world. I’ve been a part of the real world for all throughout my life.” The Congresswoman explained that she had not been able to attend the President’s speech in person because of bad road conditions. “I listened to it on the radio coming in and then I caught the tail end of it in my office.”

Continue reading …

Those air-traffic control 9/11 tapes are just riveting. While I don’t know that we’ll ever know everything that happened on that chaotic day, it’s progress that pieces of the real story are finally coming out: Newly published audio this week reveals that Vice President Dick Cheney’s infamous Sept. 11, 2001 order to shoot down rogue civilian aircraft was ignored by military officials, who instead ordered pilots to only identify suspect aircraft. That revelation is one of many in newly released audio recordings compiled by investigators for the 9/11 Commission, published this week by The Rutgers Law Review . Featuring voices from employees at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and American Airlines, the newly released multimedia provides a glimpse at the chaos that emerged as the attack progressed. Most striking of all is the revelation that an order by Vice President Dick Cheney was ignored by the military, which saw his order to shoot down aircraft as outside the chain of command . Instead of acknowledging the order to shoot down civilian aircraft and carrying it out, NORAD ordered fighters to confirm aircraft tail numbers first and report back for further instructions. Cheney’s order was given at “about 10:15″ a.m., according to the former VP’s memoirs, but the 9/11 Commission Report shows United Flight 93 going down at 10:06 a.m. Had the military followed Cheney’s order, civilian aircraft scrambling to get out of the sky could have been shot down, exponentially amplifying the day’s tragedy. Far from sending fighters to chase after the hijacked aircraft, as Bush administration officials have repeatedly said they did, the new audio tapes paint a picture of bedlam and unpreparedness. The situation was so chaotic, military officials received the exact location of one of the aircraft that hit the World Trade Center towers just nine minutes before impact. It even took a military official calling the FAA some 30 minutes after American Airlines Flight 77 went off course before the nation’s defense apparatus began scrambling. Moments later the jet is said to have slammed into the Pentagon. UPDATE : John Amato: In my earlier piece called Dick Cheney Claims He — Not Bush — Was The Decider , Cheney did not have the authority to order the military to shoot down any planes and they correctly ignored him because they do understand something called the chain of command. His follies could have led to many more Americans being hurt or killed. George Bush was alive and well at the time of the attacks and he has to be the one commanding the military and not Vice President Cheney, even if he believed he was the real Decider. Yet he bloviated in his new book how his life experiences had prepared him to take charge of the response to the 9/11 attacks. Cheney was asked by Jamie Gangel of ABC News if Bush would be upset by these reveals, but replied with a nonchalant “no”. But just think about what he is admitting to: as the 9/11 attacks were happening, Cheney has no problem revealing in his book that he was running the government response, completely against protocol. The book opens with an account of Mr. Cheney’s experiences during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when he essentially commanded the government’s response from a bunker beneath the White House while Mr. Bush — who was away from Washington and hampered by communications breakdowns — played a peripheral role. But Mr. Cheney wrote that he did not want to make any formal statement to the nation that day. “My past government experience,” he wrote, “had prepared me to manage the crisis during those first few hours on 9/11, but I knew that if I went out and spoke to the press, it would undermine the president, and that would be bad for him and for the country. “We were at war. Our commander in chief needed to be seen as in charge, strong, and resolute — as George W. Bush was.” Bush should have been in control that tragic day, not Cheney, since he was the elected president and was not incapacitated from doing his duties. His breaking of long standing US protocol had previously been reported, but this audio confirms the truth of that horrific situation. Perhaps in his haste to act — President Bush was in Florida at the time — Cheney might have shortcut White House protocol, the report said. The normal chain of command for military “engage” orders goes from the president to the Secretary of Defense, and not through the Vice President, it said. Although Cheney said he conferred with the president before giving the order, the commission staff could not confirm that a phone call took place in that time frame. Several minutes after giving the order, Cheney informed Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that he had done so. “So we’ve got a couple of aircraft up there that have those instructions at the present time?” Rumsfeld asked. “That is correct,” Cheney replied. “And it’s my understanding they’ve already taken a couple of aircraft out.” That understanding turned out to be mistaken. Perhaps in his haste to act — President Bush was in Florida at the time — Cheney might have shortcut White House protocol, the report said. The normal chain of command for military “engage” orders goes from the president to the Secretary of Defense, and not through the Vice President, it said. Although Cheney said he conferred with the president before giving the order, the commission staff could not confirm that a phone call took place in that time frame. Several minutes after giving the order, Cheney informed Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that he had done so. “So we’ve got a couple of aircraft up there that have those instructions at the present time?” Rumsfeld asked. “That is correct,” Cheney replied. “And it’s my understanding they’ve already taken a couple of aircraft out.” That understanding turned out to be mistaken. Why hasn’t any reporters asked President Bush why he was unable to communicate with the military at such a crucial time in our history, but could apparently talk to Cheney? And then they could ask Cheney why he thought he was above the law, yet again?

Continue reading …
Kate Winslet Talks Nude Scenes In V Magazine

One thing you’d never expect to hear come from the dainty, proper mouth of “Titanic” heroine Rose: “left nut sack.” Which, more than anything, proves that Kate Winslet is a pretty darn good actress. The Oscar-winner covers this month’s issue of V Magazine, in which she talks about her love for Elizabeth Taylor (and takes some photos in homage to the late star) and discusses that buzzy link bait topic of nude scenes. Turns out, she’s not a fan of them (but will do them anyway). “I hate it! Listen make no mistake, I just get on it,” she says about baring it all on film. “I just go in and say ‘Oh f*ck’ let’s do it.’ and boom. If you complain about it or procrastinate it’s not going to go away. Its a profoundly bizarre thing to do. As actors you talk about it all the time. You can literally be tangled in sheets, and you turn to the other actor and say ‘What the f*ck are we doing?’ Dear Mum, at work today I had so-and-so’s left nut sack pressed against my cheek. It’s sort of unethical if you think about it in those terms.” In which films, exactly, she has that sort of anatomically-awkward situation going down is a bit uncertain, but nonetheless, it’s an interesting admission from one of the industry’s top stars. She had a particularly heavy nude scene in her HBO miniseries, “Mildred Pierce,” earlier this year, which came after she pledged to stop doing them. In her new film, at least, Winslet will remain fully clothed — otherwise, she’d probably die. She stars in Stephen Soderbergh’s infectious thriller, “Contagion,” playing a doctor looking to stop the spread of a mysterious illness that’s ravaging the world. Winslet will also star in Roman Polanski’s upcoming film, “Carnage,” as one in a group of four parents trying to settle a dispute stemming from an after-school fight between their children. She keeps the clothes for Polanski — instead, she sheds her lunch in an already buzzed-about vomiting scene. She’s got a thing for grossness, it seems. At least, hypothetically. “I hope I am shitting myself over the characters I play for the rest of my life,” Winslet tells V, in an aspirational forecast for the rest of her career. “Because the day I go ‘Oh yeah, that’s going to be a piece of pie’, why f*cking bother? If you do that, you do not learn. I hope I’m always learning something. So I won an Oscar. It’s amazing. I’ve got that for the rest of my life for a performance I am proud of. It nearly killed me. I am really proud of the film. That’s it, moving on.” For more from Winslet, click over to V Magazine. PHOTO:

Continue reading …

Drew Brees

No Comment
Drew Brees

Packers Beat Saints 42-34 Aaron Rodgers Throws 3 TDs VIDEO Watch Packers vs Saints live stream online free 2011 NFL games Watch Packers vs Saints NFL live free online LeopoldoHoltzen says: ;O drew brees What do you think Drew Brees stats will be this week? http://t.co/YCv8wXd

Continue reading …

Gross! The producers of the sick new thriller Contagion came up with a creepy way to promote their product. Warner Bros. Pictures Canada hired microbiologists to culture bacteria on billboards that grew to spell out the name of the movie in a most disgusting way, reports Adweek . Scientists inoculated two…

Continue reading …
ZTE Sprint International Mobile Hotspot does CDMA in US, GSM abroad

We love mobile wireless hotspots , and we especially love when they work internationally — which until today, has left Sprint’s CDMA/WiMAX devices out of the mix. This latest variant gives some love to the world traveling crowd, however, with domestic support for EVDO Rev A, and international support for GSM/GRPS/EDGE as well as WCDMA/HSDPA/HSUPA. There’s no word on what you’ll expect to pay for your data abroad, but Sprint does include an “unlocked SIM” in the box, along with international power adapters. A built-in display indicates battery life and connectivity, so you know when the device is ready to beam the web to up to five WiFi devices on CDMA, or a single device while roaming on GSM. Available now, the hotspot will run you $50 after a $50 rebate and with a two-year contract, provides a range of up to 130 feet, and can pump out a wireless signal for up to four hours (sadly WiMAX is not supported). Jump past the break for the lowdown from Sprint. Continue reading ZTE Sprint International Mobile Hotspot does CDMA in US, GSM abroad ZTE Sprint International Mobile Hotspot does CDMA in US, GSM abroad originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …