The outrage concerning New York Times columnist Paul Krugman's disgusting comments on the tenth anniversary of 9/11 came from all quarters of the political arena Monday. Never one to mince words, Fox News's Greg Gutfeld on “The Five” said what many Americans were feeling about this liberal sociopath , “Go to hell, Paul Krugman, you bearded, bitter buffoon” (video follows with transcript and commentary): GREG GUTFELD, HOST: Welcome back to THE FIVE. So, on the tenth anniversary of 9/11, “New York Times” columnist Paul Krugman delivered the odious piece of dribble ever on the attack — well, at least since the last time he wrote about it. The headline is, quote, “The Years of Shame,” end quote. And no, it's not directed at radical Islam. Instead, he targets America and the, quote, “fake heroes.” Krugman claims that the atrocity has been hijacked. The sick word given that he's not actually talking about the real hijackers who killed some 3,000 Americans. No, he's referring to people like George Bush and Rudy Giuliani who he thinks capitalized on the horrible crimes. But the worst part, at the end of this column, the creep writes, “I'm not going to allow comments on the post for obvious reasons.” That obvious reason, he's a coward. I mean, why else would you ban responses? He's like a 10-year-old boy crank-calling all of us only to hang up even before he hears a response, hearing his shame for his own wickedness. Now, I watch the memorial services and I feel sorrow for the families whose grief never really ends. But since I'm lousy at emotional reflection I usually avoid it. But at least I can summarize what many feel today in nine words: go to hell, Paul Krugman, you bearded, bitter buffoon. Hey, Dana, there is something wrong with him. Can we pretty much agree? DANA PERINO: Yes, week after week, it gets a little bit more crazy. I mean, when he did that thing about like for the stimulus bill, we should to have the alien invasion, if you all remember that. Perino was referring to a story first reported by NewsBusters last month wherein Krugman,
Continue reading …Long-term, regular use of non-aspirin anti-inflammatory painkillers raises the likelihood of developing kidney cancer by more than 50%, a study shows.
Continue reading …An honor guard played taps. American flags lay on caskets. Mourners put flowers on the casket lids. Nearly 500 family members attended the burial today of the remains of victims of Flight 93, at the new Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Penn. A Catholic priest, a Lutheran minister, rabbi,…
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — In a sharp challenge to the GOP, on Monday proposed paying for his costly new jobs plan with tax hikes that have already rejected, and he accused them of political motives if they still refuse to go along. “The only thing that’s stopping it is politics,” Obama said. The president’s proposal drew criticism from House Speaker (R-), who’d previously responded in cautious but somewhat receptive tones to the $447-billion jobs plan made up of tax cuts and new spending Obama first proposed in an address to Congress on Thursday. “It would be fair to say this tax increase on job creators is the kind of proposal both parties have opposed in the past. We remain eager to work together on…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Why isn’t the mainstream media saying anything about a so-called objective media outlet partnering with a mainstream Republican organization like the Tea Party Express? I’m watching the debate right now but I’ve got to tell you all…this intro was insulting and beneath our political process.
Continue reading …[ReadAloud at OSU] American Sign Language: Bear Wants More by Karma Wilson Ohio State Football Sneak Peek [ReadAloud at OSU] American Sign Language gideonyu says: Ted Ginn is my new mancrush RT @ justjlo : Teddy Ginn! 2 return TDs in 59 secs. THE Ohio State University …that’s right, @ gideonyu ! #GoNiners
Continue reading …We shouldn’t be completely shocked by the news, but it’s great to hear regardless. US Cellular announced the upcoming availability of the Motorola Electrify, which is essentially its rebranded version of the Photon 4G — sans WiMAX, of course. The device will be ready for your purchase sometime later this month for $200, which is the same starting cost as Sprint’s variant provided you don’t factor in the initial $100 mail-in rebate. The Electrify is a 1GHz dual-core handset with Android 2.3, a 4.3-inch qHD display, webtop support and 8MP rear / VGA front-facing camera set. We definitely love seeing powerhouses like this make it to the smaller carriers, so if you’re an interested US Cellular fanboy or girl, just be sure that you’re not dying to see what the company will offer when its LTE network launches . [Thanks, ChuckyTee] Continue reading Motorola Electrify coming to US Cellular this month as a rebranded Photon 4G Motorola Electrify coming to US Cellular this month as a rebranded Photon 4G originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:25:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Breakfast in the morning ISS Canary Wharf Squash Classic Round 1 – Boswell vs Mustonen 5.MOV ISS Canary Wharf Squash Classic Round 1 – Boswell vs Mustonen 4.MOV hriacobacci says: I forgot spaghetti squash at the store RT @ julgolean : I think it’s a spaghetti squash pasta kinda night don’t you?
Continue reading …Adam Lambert AMA Show and Jon and Kate Finale – The Toast How we say Goodbye // Jon and Kate plus 8 Season Finale jon and kate plus 8 final episode SaraDomaratzki3 says: Kate plus 8 finale tonight ? Hell yeaaaa:)
Continue reading …• Serb wins third grand slam title of year • Completes victory 6-2, 6-4, 6-7, 6-1 Novak Djokovic might still be the king of tennis but it took a struggle of epic proportions over four sets at Flushing Meadows to rip Rafael Nadal’s fingers from his remaining crown. The Serb beat him for the sixth time in six finals this year to take the Spaniard’s US Open title in a match of so many highs the lows were rendered irrelevant, a price worth paying for one of the finest finishes to a major in recent times. The sustained quality of the exchanges, in rallies that ran to 30 shots and more, left the 24,712 excitement junkies packed into the Arthur Ashe stadium delirious on a balmy New York Monday night and the combatants drained of the last drop of their genius. It took the world No 1 four hours and 10 minutes to subdue the reigning champion 6-2, 6-4, 6-7, 6-1 on a night when one miracle followed another. It was not just the length of the fight that made it such a compelling sporting occasion but the ability and willingness of both players to come back from impossible positions. Nadal lost his serve 11 times, yet never gave up; Djokovic, battered in the tie-break, took a medical time-out at the start of the fourth set, then immediately broke Nadal, going on to finish a job he had looked like completing maybe two hours earlier. The tournament was introduced by an earthquake, survived a hurricane, was embarrassingly mismanaged as courts and nerves cracked in the second week as the elements returned to mock the organising committee, then was marred by a Serena Williams tantrum on Sunday. But the men’s delayed final restored the championship’s integrity in the most emphatic manner. The crowd responded to the mood. Several times the chair umpire, Carlos Ramos, had to call for quiet from supporters of both players who were shouting either during serve or on critical strokes in a rally. The interruptions seemed to disturb Djokovic more than Nadal. It was an unequivocal statement by Djokovic. There can be no argument that he has the measure of not just Nadal but Roger Federer, the world No3 whom he beat in that remarkable semi-final on Saturday. It was his third slam title of the year, after Melbourne and Wimbledon, and only a magical reincarnation of the old Federer stopped him reaching the final at Roland Garros. Andy Murray was the other player to beat him in a year in which he hit peak after peak, culminating here with another crushing defeat of the world No2. If this were a fight, Nadal would have been punched to a pulp at the end but Djokovic’s knuckles would have been bruised beyond recognition. Djokovic, who has a win-loss record in 2011 of 64-2 with more to come, hit him hard and deep, wide and handsome, then had to take similar punishment in return. There was such ferocity in some of the winner’s ground strokes that Nadal had to reply leaning back and hitting from way behind the baseline. For sustained passages of play he simply could not get into range to hit easy winners. His points were dredged from desperate deaths or scored on his opponent’s errors. Nadal started so well and had the majority of the crowd with him when he broke Djokovic early in each of the first two sets, only to surrender the advantage at once. Stirred, Djokovic retaliated fiercely. But the Mallorcan’s serve let him down at crucial points, dipping to 50% in the second set, when he looked like being blown away. But nobody could doubt Nadal’s fighting heart. On one of the few occasions when he had Djokovic on the back foot, 2-0 up at the start of the second set thanks to six unforced errors by his opponent, he was perfectly placed to extend his lead. Then came the game of the match: a 17-minute duel on Nadal’s serve in which he was dragged into eight deuce points and Djokovic finally broke him on the sixth opportunity. It came at the end of another long, gruelling rally, Nadal, straining backwards in mid-court banging a tired smash into the net. If that was the longest war, there were several other skirmishes nearly as tough. In the fifth game of the third set, having broken back in the previous game, a 27-shot rally at 40-30 up ended in agony for Nadal and another deuce battle. They traded so many quality shots in the exchanges that followed it seemed the game would never end. When it did, the ball flew limply down the tram-lines off Nadal’s racket to give Djokovic yet another glimmer of a kill. They went at it all the way to the final bell and there were tears, inevitably, when the deed was done. The mutual respect between them is palpable and that is something not always evident at the summit of international sport. They did their sport a great service. US Open 2011 Tennis US Open tennis Novak Djokovic Rafael Nadal Kevin Mitchell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …