Four men trapped underground in the Gleision colliery found dead within a few metres of each other After more than 30 hours of waiting, it was the terrible news the families had dreaded but in their hearts had begun to expect. All four men trapped deep underground in the Gleision colliery high in the Swansea Valley had been found dead. They died, as they worked, close together, discovered within a few metres of each other in the old, cramped mine. Peter Hain, the local MP and shadow Welsh secretary, who had spent hours with the family as they waited, said: “Extraordinary courage was shown by the families right through the night, tortuous hours of waiting. We can’t imagine what they have been through.” He said the tragedy had reawakened old memories. “This has been a stab right through the heart of these local communities. There’s a long tradition of mining here but nobody expected the tragedies of past generations would come today.” Police and safety officials promised to establish how and why the four miners were killed. Forensic teams were at the mine in the village of Cilybebyll beginning to piece together what happened. The four – Charles Breslin, 62, David Powell, 50, Phillip Hill, 45, and Garry Jenkins, 39 – were trapped after water poured into the shaft they were working in on Thursday morning. Three others, including Powell’s son, Daniel, managed to get out and raise the alarm. Families waited for news at a community centre close to the mine. But in the early hours of they were told a body had been found in a flooded shaft. At that point it could not be identified, leaving all four families wondering if it was their loved one. Rescuers managed to pump water from the tunnel and hack through a rockfall, hoping to find the three remaining miners alive. Firefighters with 30 years’ experience said they had never worked in such bad conditions. But at lunchtime a second body was found and by mid afternoon the third was discovered. Rescuers said they had not heard or seen any sign life but continued to search the network of tunnels looking for the fourth miner. His body was discovered at teatime. The attention of the authorities will now focus on finding out what caused the tragedy. Police and the Health and Safety Executive have already launched parallel inquiries. The prime minister, David Cameron, said: “In due course we must ensure we fully understand and learn from the causes of this accident.” Wales Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media The one thing you can say about this Cheney family — they’ve got their lies and they’re sticking to them — no matter what. After feeling the need to give the Bush administration some glowing praise for torture, the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay, Bill O’Reilly actually challenged the assertion that we were greeted as liberators in Iraq made by Dick Cheney years ago on Meet the Press . Naturally, his daughter Liz, disagreed. O’Reilly pointed to the falling of the statue of Saddam Hussein and that there was only a very small group of people there as evidence that we were not greeted as liberators. What Billo failed to point out to her during this softball interview, is that event was staged by our military as our own Silent Patriot reminded us of back on the 4th anniversary of that event . As to Cheney still repeating the “greeted as liberators” line, John Amato wrote about this back in 2007 when John McCain was carrying water for the Bush administration, repeating that already tired and debunked line back then as well: John McCain told Tim Russert that America was greeted as liberators when we got to Iraq. What is he talking about. When were we ever greeted as liberators? It wasn’t like ten months of peace and tranquility. The looting began almost immediately . He also says that the war was easy. Easy for who? One thing we can count on is that as long as these neocons and supporters of the Iraq invasion are still alive, they’re going to do their best to continue to revise the history books in their favor. Full transcript below the fold. O’REILLY: Ok. The second one is the Iraq war. You know that I’m a supporter or I was a supporter. CHENEY: I actually didn’t know that. O’REILLY: Well, it’s true. I mean I’m on the record of supporting the enhanced interrogations, the Patriot Act, Guantanamo Bay and, you know, consistently across the line. But there’s a historical record and the historical record is that Americans were not aware of the big threat that al Qaeda was posing. CHENEY: The records actually on al Qaeda that before 9/11, we treated it like a law enforcement problem. O’REILLY: Yes. And Clinton did and Bush did. CHENEY: And I think that is the key difference is that the president and the vice president, Bush and Cheney understood after 9/11, this is war. And we’re at war. We have to do whatever it takes to keep the nation safe. O’REILLY: All right. Three days before the Iraq war was launched, here’s what Vice President Cheney said on “Meet the Press”. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) DICK CHENEY, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I think that things have gotten so bad inside Iraq from the standpoint of the Iraqi people. My belief is we will in fact be greeted as liberators. O’REILLY: Ok. Obviously, that didn’t happen. And I would love to know — CHENEY: It actually did happen. We were greeted as liberators and then we saw a massive, bloody, dangerous insurgency began. And it wasn’t frankly until we were able in 2006 with the surge to adopt a counter- insurgency strategy that we were able to frankly turn things around. O’REILLY: Ok. But here’s where you’re wrong. We weren’t greeted as liberators. We were greeted in a way that was tentative. CHENEY: It’s not true. O’REILLY: Yes it is. CHENEY: No, it’s not true. O’REILLY: You saw the statue came down and how many people were out there? Do you know how many people were out there when the statue of Saddam Hussein came down? Do you know how many? CHENEY: Do you know how many Bill? O’REILLY: Yes, I do. A couple of hundred, not thousands; Baghdad is a city of millions. A couple of hundred. CHENEY: Bill — O’REILLY: And then right after the statue came down, the armories were looted and the terrorists went in and they took all of Saddam Hussein’s arms, ok? CHENEY: Look, I know how much — O’REILLY: Because our government wasn’t accepting that. CHENEY: I know how much you care about no spin. O’REILLY: Right. CHENEY: And I think it’s really important here. Saddam was an incredibly repressive dictator — O’REILLY: No doubt. CHENEY: The Iraqi people were glad to see him go. Saddam had in place — there were elements from his regime that stayed in place. There were elements from al Qaeda, elements from Iran who were there who were ready, who launched a very bloody insurgency. O’REILLY: Correct. And it was not anticipated by us. That insurgency — (CROSSTALK) CHENEY: I think it was not anticipated by everyone. I think that’s true. O’REILLY: It was not anticipated. CHENEY: But it’s — when we removed Saddam Hussein, we made sure that there wasn’t going to be somebody in place who we knew had ties to terror, who we knew, knew how to make weapons of mass destruction, who we knew had used them before, who we knew was supporting terrorists. We also, by the way, as soon as Saddam was gone got a phone call from Moammar Gadhafi who didn’t want to be next, who gave up his nuclear weapons. O’REILLY: There were good things that happened. No doubt. CHENEY: I think that the notion that we now have in the heart of the Middle East, a democracy that is not supporting terrorists. It’s not perfect. But it is a huge accomplishment of the Bush Administration that we liberated all those people and the people in Afghanistan. And I think it’s just flat wrong for you to call it that. O’REILLY: Ok. And I disagree in the sense that it could have been done in a different way. I would have — the same result. CHENEY: Which way? Would you have gone and talked to Saddam and said, “Hey, you ought to — O’REILLY: No, I would have gone the Bush the Elder, way, the president’s father and I would have strangled them with a blockade. I would have no-fly zoned it as they would have done and then when the drones were developed — CHENEY: Bill, you have to look at the reports that were done by the Iraq survey group, for example. It was clear when we come came into office in 2000 that Saddam was a threat. He had between the time of the first Bush Administration and this Bush Administration completely ignored 16 U.N. Security Council resolutions — O’REILLY: There’s no doubt about it. CHENEY: — that the sanctions regime was crumbling. So it’s just not accurate to say he was in a box. We could have strangled him. And after 9/11, we couldn’t run the risk — that somebody like Saddam was going to share technology about WMD. O’REILLY: I don’t expect you and your father to agree with me, ok? But the blood and treasure of the United States spent in Iraq has now come back into our country in a very negative way. CHENEY: We need more time and I feel confident that I could convince you of the rightness of my position. O’REILLY: I thank you for coming in Miss Cheney. We appreciate it. CHENEY: Thank you. Good to be here.
Continue reading …So who was the crack financial sleuth who caught rogue UBS trader Kweku Adoboli? Um, that’d be Kweku Adoboli. UBS’ internal systems didn’t blink at Adoboli’s $2 billion screw-up ; it only came to light because he brought it to his bosses’ attention, the BBC reports. The revelation is likely to…
Continue reading …Stephen Sondheim may hate it, but TIME’s Richard Zoglin can’t get enough of a new revival of Porgy and Bess. In the latest issue of TIME, Zoglin takes a look at a new spin on the opera, which is currently showing in Massachusetts but will hit Broadway this winter. Sondheim, and some other critics, decried
Continue reading …CASEY ANTHONY REACTS TO $100000 FINE MichaelPaulDell says: Struggling Postal Service announces ‘new reality’: http://t.co/un4ZIj4C
Continue reading …(CNN) – She lost the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, but over a third of Americans said the U.S. would…
Continue reading …Woo, boy. We’ve been bursting at the seams to share this one, and it’s finally time — Engadget is teaming up with the one and only eBoy ( read our introduction here ) in order to open up our very own t-shirt shop! We’ve worked with eBoy over the years, and we’ve never been let down by their mind-blowing work. Every so often, we’ve offered up a stash of shirts for our dear readers to snap up, and every time, they were gone before sundown. That’s just not right. To remedy said quandary, we’ve worked up a beautiful arrangement that’ll have one of our favorite artists whipping out t-shirt designs for us, and they’ll be handling the orders and logistics as they’ve been doing for years. Pre-orders are live worldwide right now , and initial shipments should start flowing around mid-October. Our first five designs are showcased in the gallery below, and if you’re interested, surf on down to the source link below to grab one (or two!). They’re priced at $24 (US / Canada), or €20 elsewhere, and if you’re curious about sizing, have a look at American Apparel’s size chart right here . We hope you love ‘em as much as we do, and we’ll be giving 50 percent of the proceeds received to Child’s Play Charity , which provides games, books and cash for sick kids in children’s hospitals across North America and the world. Gallery: Engadget’s Fall 2011 t-shirt collection, designed by eBoy! The Engadget / eBoy t-shirt shop is officially open, pre-orders start today! originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:25:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Economists are citing a one-in-three chance of a new recession—the highest likelihood given in the Wall Street Journal ’s regular survey since the recovery began. The figure is 4 percentage points higher than last month’s as joblessness, a troubled stock market, and fears for Europe continue. “It feels like…
Continue reading …The cheers in the last GOP debate during a question about health insurance—should society let a sick person who has opted out of coverage just die?—illustrate a point that Paul Krugman thinks has not been “fully absorbed” yet: “At this point, American politics is fundamentally about different moral…
Continue reading …‘Desperate Housewives’ Star Eva Longoria Has A Strong Personality Fort Boyard 2009 – Bande annonce pour l’émission 1 (Version courte) (27/06/2009) BoDyGuarD Nicollette Sheridan Eva Longoria Tony Parker chismesymas_com says: Chismes y Mas: Eva Longoria : “ Tony Parker y yo … http://t.co/YuoQYZOm
Continue reading …