Home » Posts tagged with » video (Page 89)
Watch ‘Ren & Stimpy’ Show Creator John Kricfalusi’s Couch Gag From ‘The Simpsons’

No, you didn’t get a touch of space madness watching The Simpsons Sunday night. Matt Groening and company just happened to commision another famous artist to animate their own couch gag. We’ve already seen Banksy’s take [1] but there’s a possibility John Kricfalusi’s might be even more disturbing. Kricfalusi is best known for his hit 1990s Nickelodeon series Ren & Stimpy and has since been doing music… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : /Film Discovery Date : 03/10/2011 06:43 Number of articles : 2

Continue reading …
ABC, NBC Highlight Obama’s Attack on GOP Over Boos in Audience

The ABC and NBC morning and evening newscasts on Sunday gave attention to President Obama's attack on the Republican presidential candidates for not scolding a couple of audience members who booed a gay solder asking a question at a recent debate. Monday's “Special Report with Bret Baier” on FNC noted that Obama has his own history of standing by without condemning inappropriate comments at public events. ABC correspondent David Kerley filed full reports devoted to the story on both “Good Morning America” and “World News Sunday,” while NBC's Mike Viqueira mentioned Obama's line of attack within other reports on “Sunday Today” and on the “NBC Nightly News.” CBS's “Sunday Morning” show did not mention the story, while a Nexis search finds no sign that Sunday's “CBS Evening News,” which was preempted in the D.C. area, made any mention either. On “Good Morning America,” co-host Dan Harris set up Kerley's report: Now, though, politics and an unusually combative President Obama last night. For the most part, Mr. Obama has tried to stay above the fray when it comes to the Republican presidential candidates. But overnight, he took a hard shot at the Republicans for failing to stand up for a gay soldier who was booed during a recent debate. Kerley recounted the boos from the audience: Who said the election is more than a year away? A full-throated attack against all the Republican candidates who are trying to become President, and this all had to do with, as you said, that debate last week, when a video appeared of an Army soldier who said he was gay. There were boos from the audience. And on “World News Sunday,” anchor David Muir introduced the piece: And we do move on to the presidential race this evening, and the sharpest attacks yet by President Obama against the Republicans who want his job. The President pointedly asking why none of them spoke out at that recent debate when a gay soldier asking a question was booed. After playing a clip of the soldier being booed, Kerley added: Not one of the candidates on the stage said anything about the booing, leaving them open to the combative chiding from the President at last night's Human Rights Campaign dinner. It was not until this report on “World News Sunday” that Kerley eventually noted that there were only a couple of audience members who booed at the Republican debate, and that the candidates may have had trouble hearing the booing from the stage: Some of the Republican candidates said after the debate, they didn't hear the boos. Others said they weren't given time to comment. During the “Fox All Stars” segment on Monday's “Special Report with Bret Baier,” panel member Stephen Hayes of the “Weekly Standard” argued that the audience members who booed were not representative of the general audience, and noted Obama's history of not jumping in to chide controversial comments at public events: But really, by all accounts, the people immediately after the debate in the vicinity said there were two people who booed at the event, and that they were, in fact, shouted down and shushed by everyone around them. He continued: So do you really want to get in a pattern where a presidential candidate has to respond to every every heckler in every crowd? This President didn't respond to some of the hateful rhetoric that we've seen from people either working for him or campaigning for him, Richard Trumka being a recent example. Host Baier soon added: Here is what Rush Limbaugh has said in the blogosphere and radio show today, is that then-Senator Obama didn't respond to Reverend Wright for 20 years in that church. That's what he said. Then he said he didn't respond to James Hoffa after he spoke intro-ing him at that event. Below are transcripts of the relevant portions of ABC's “Good Morning America,” ABC's “World News Sunday,” NBC's “Sunday Today,” the “NBC Nightly News,” from October 2, and the Monday, October 3, “Special Report with Bret Baier” on FNC, with criticial portions in bold : #From the Sunday, October 2, Good Morning America on ABC: DAN HARRIS, IN OPENING TEASER: Heating up: In some of his toughest words yet, the President comes out swinging at his Republican rivals, calling them out for not standing up for gay troops when one of them was booed at a recent debate. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: You wanna be Commander-in-Chief? You can start by standing up for the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States. … DAN HARRIS: Now, though, politics and an unusually combative President Obama last night. For the most part, Mr. Obama has tried to stay above the fray when it comes to the Republican presidential candidates. But overnight, he took a hard shot at the Republicans for failing to stand up for a gay soldier who was booed during a recent debate . ABC's David Kerley is at the White House this morning. And, David, this was a fired up Mr. Obama. DAVID KERLEY: It certainly was, Dan. Who said the election is more than a year away? A full-throated attack against all the Republican candidates who are trying to become President, and this all had to do with, as you said, that debate last week, when a video appeared of an Army soldier who said he was gay. There were boos from the audience. Here's what President Obama had to say about that last night. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We don't believe in the kind of smallness that says it's okay for a stage full of political leaders, one of whom could end up being the President of the United States, being silent when an American soldier is booed. You wanna be Commander-in-Chief? You can start by standing up for the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States even when it's not politically convenient. KERLEY: That speech was at the annual dinner of the Human Rights Campaign, and it sounded like a campaign speech, the President going through a litany of things he's done as far as rights and civil rights and at the end of it. As he talked about this soldier and other cases, it really did sound like a campaign. #From the October 2 World News Sunday on ABC: DAVID MUIR: And we do move on to the presidential race this evening, and the sharpest attacks yet by President Obama against the Republicans who want his job. The President pointedly asking why none of them spoke out at that recent debate when a gay soldier asking a question was booed. Here's ABC's David Kerley. DAVID KERLEY: The election may be a year away, but candidate Obama went after every Republican running for President. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We don't believe in the kind of smallness that says it's okay for a stage full of political leaders, one of whom could end up being the President of the United States, being silent when an American soldier is booed. We don't believe in that. KERLEY: That American soldier appeared on videotape at the most recent Republican debate, an openly gay soldier, who was booed by some in the audience when he asked a question. STEPHEN HILL, U.S. ARMY: Do you intend to circumvent the progress that's been made for gay and lesbian soldiers in the military? KERLEY: Not one of the candidates on the stage said anything about the booing, leaving them open to the combative chiding from the President at last night's Human Rights Campaign dinner. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: You want to be Commander-in-Chief? You can start by standing up for the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States, even when it's not politically convenient. KERLEY: Some of the Republican candidates said after the debate, they didn't hear the boos. Others said they weren't given time to comment. Today on ABC's “This Week,” candidate Herman Cain was asked directly if he now regrets not rebuking the boos during the debate. HERMAN CAIN, REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I did not have that luxury because I was not in control. I was not moderated. CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, HOST OF THIS WEEK: In retrospect, would you have done something, given the controversy it's touched up? CAIN: In retrospect, because of the controversy it has created and because of the different interpretations that it could have had, yes, that would have been appropriate. KERLEY: We reached out to the other Republican campaigns looking for reaction to the strong comments by the President. None of them responded directly to what the President had to say. #From the October 2 Sunday Today on NBC: LESTER HOLT, IN OPENING TEASER: And fighting words: President Obama lashes out at the Republican White House candidates for not standing up for gays serving in the military. What his tough talk means for the issue and the campaign today, Sunday, October 2, 2011. … MIKE VIQUEIRA: And, Jenna, last night the President and First Lady Michelle Obama were celebrating their 19th anniversary here locally across the river, out for dinner in Alexandria, Virginia. It came after the President gave another fiery speech to a core constituency, a large gay rights organization known as the Human Rights Campaign. Their annual gathering was here in Washington last night. The President took those Republican candidates to task for staying silent. You remember when a gay soldier serving overseas was booed by some members of the audience at the last debate. And the President stopped short again of backing gay marriage. You know, he's opposed to gay marriage. That has been his policy, though he says his views are evolving. #From the Sunday, October 2, NBC Nightly News : MIKE VIQUEIRA: And last night, President Obama gave an impassioned address to a major gay rights group. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Don't Ask, Don't Tell is history. VIQUEIRA: Mr. Obama was critical of GOP candidates after they failed to defend a gay soldier booed during a recent debate. OBAMA: You want to be Commander in Chief, you can start by standing up for the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States, even when it's not politically convenient. #From the Monday, October 3, Special Report with Bret Baier on FNC: BRET BAIER: I should say that is a soldier. He is not a Marine. He is wearing an Army t-shirt. But you heard boos there. Steve, what about the President mentioning this numerous times? STEPHEN HAYES, WEEKLY STANDARD: Well, I think it suggests that he is likely to focus on issues that don't have to do with the economy in this upcoming election because it's a lot easier. I think it's a cheap shot. I think that it would have been great if the President, the candidates on the stage that night would have said you shouldn't boo. But really, by all accounts, the people immediately after the debate in the vicinity said there were two people who booed at the event, and that they were, in fact, shouted down and shushed by everyone around them. So do you really want to get in a pattern where a presidential candidate has to respond to every every heckler in every crowd? This President didn't respond to some of the hateful rhetoric that we've seen from people either working for him or campaigning for him, Richard Trumka being a recent example. BAIER: Juan, you're shaking your head. What about that? JUAN WILLIAMS, FOX NEWS ANALYST: I think that's a rationalization by Steve. I think that is reprehensible. I don'' think you should be booing gay soldiers or any soldiers. HAYES: Wait. I didn't say that and I didn't suggest that. I said I would like to have seen them condemn that, the fact that even though it was only two people. But you really start a bad precedent if you think everybody should respond to boorish behavior of a couple of people. BAIER: Here is what Rush Limbaugh has said in the blogosphere and radio show today, is that then-Senator Obama didn't respond to Reverend Wright for 20 years in that church. That's what he said. Then he said he didn't respond to James Hoffa after he spoke intro-ing him at that event.

Continue reading …

Eric Foster

No Comment
Eric Foster

Colts Injury Eric Foster on MNF More videos for Eric Foster colts injury breaks leg GROSS MNF » Eric Foster Suffers Broken Leg (Video) | Larry Brown Sports Talguese says: RT @ PierreGarcon85 : Thanks for the love and support. Please keep one of my best friends on the team Eric Foster in your prayers. Get Well Soon Eric .

Continue reading …
ShowBiz Minute: Jackson, Cowell, Hynde

Jackson doctor’s phone records on display; Cowell regrets lofty ‘X Factor’ ratings projection; Chrissie Hynde closes Ohio eatery, citing economy. (Oct. 4)

Continue reading …

The successful mission to kill Islamic radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki naturally drew disgust on the left, even against President Obama. On Friday night’s Rachel Maddow show, the critic was Spencer Ackerman of Wired magazine, who in the JournoList expose by the Daily Caller clearly proved he wasn’t a pacifist, when he gleefully talked of throwing anti-terrorism expert Michael Ledeen into the wall or through a window: “I’ll bet a little spot of violence would shut him right the f— up, as with most bullies.” He wondered why Obama wouldn't have drone attacks in Massachusetts, where the latest Islamic-radical plotter of D.C. violence was based. On the radio, comedian John Fugelsang tried to joke that the deceased owed him money, and Thom Hartmann blamed Bush: “I think that Anwar al-Awlaki would not even exist as a phenomenon had George Bush not responded to 9/11 by going nuts.” Ackerman wanted to establish that al-Awlaki was distasteful, but dismissed the idea that the government had enough evidence to justify attacks: ACKERMAN: They're clearly guilty of incitement. You can see on any of Awlaki's disgusting, poisonous videos how they're trying to get Americans to kill their fellow Americans. On the other hand, there's absolutely no evidence ever been offered that either man was part of an operational cell of al Qaeda or part of an unfolding plot, it's just pure assertions. And to kill an American without any recourse to due process of law absent that basic evidence is crossing a Rubicon in the war on terrorism. MADDOW: In terms of that Rubicon and whether there are others, if the U.S. government can justify this action overseas, what about here in the US? I mean, we know the FBI's also tracking people with possible ties to al Qaeda and other forms of extremism. Does, how close is this to the government claiming the right to kill first and ask questions later of U.S. citizens in the United States? ACKERMAN: Right. I don't understand what the differentiating criterion could be. You know, why in Sana'a and not Schnectady? Why in Yemen and not Yuma? If the important factor is that an American citizen can be targeted for destruction, why not just fly a drone over the next, you know, plot the, you know, like we heard this week, that guy from Massachusetts was apparently trying to pull off. Why even bother arresting an American citizen at all and then you're down the exceptionally tricky, murky and ugly constitutional path? Maddow ended the segment by honoring Ackerman for his clarifying wisdom. She clearly has a bad case of political schizophrenia on this issue. The “Sybil” segment began with Maddow showing old clips of Rudy Giuliani and John McCain saying Obama had a pre-9/11 mentality. Then, like a good DNC press agent, she listed about 20 terrorists who’ve been killed in the Obama era, and replayed the GOP clips for effect. From there, she promptly displayed the pre-9/11 mentality in wanting terrorists to have “due process,” not drone attacks. Message: Obama's plenty tough on terrorists, you Republican liars!

Continue reading …
KDDI shows off sensory enhancements for smartphone users, throws a free-viewpoint virtual concert

Japanese carrier KDDI’s never been shy about showing off its latest and greatest from its lab, and here at CEATEC 2011 we got to lay our fingers on a couple of its in-development smartphone sensory enhancements, along with a free-viewpoint concert concept that’s being researched on. The first demo we saw was actually the same haptic smartphone prototype that was unveiled back in May, but we thought it’d be nice to give it a go with our very own hands — read on to find out how well it performed. Gallery: KDDI shows off sensory enhancements for smartphone users, throws a free-viewpoint virtual concert Continue reading KDDI shows off sensory enhancements for smartphone users, throws a free-viewpoint virtual concert KDDI shows off sensory enhancements for smartphone users, throws a free-viewpoint virtual concert originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:46:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Prevent Your Car from Being Towed with Call Before Tow

LAKE FOREST, Calif., Oct. 4, 2011 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — CBT Solutions Inc. announces a new, free tow notification service – Call Before Tow(TM) – that notifies vehicle owners when their vehicle is about to be towed on private property. Vehicle owners are notified by a text message and phone call warning them to move their vehicles before a tow. The warning is designed to prevent the tow and allow… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Send2Press Newswire Discovery Date : 22/09/2011 03:55 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
Nobel Prize in Physics – live blog

The announcement from Stockholm of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics is imminent 11.04am: Brian Schmidt: “It seemed too crazy to be right so we were a little scared. “I always look to Einstein because he got a lot right. Einstein’s idea that space itself has an energy is the simplest reason that the universe could be speeding up.” 11.02am: Nobel prize winner Brian Schmidt answering questions: “It feels like when my children were born…” 10.57am: More from the Nobel Assembly’s material: The growing rate of the expansion implies that the Universe is being pushed apart by an unknown form of energy embedded in the fabric of space. This dark energy makes up a large part of the Universe, more than 70 %, and it is an enigma, perhaps the greatest in physics today. No wonder, then, that cosmology was shaken at its foundations when two different research groups presented similar results in 1998. 10.54am: All three are relative youngsters for the Nobel prize. Perlmutter was born in 1959, Schmidt in 1967 and Reiss in 1969. 10.53am: One half of the prize goes to Saul Perlmutter at the Supernova Cosmology Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley, California. The other half goes jointly to Brian Schmidt of the High-z Supernova Search Team at the Australian National University and Adam G. Riess at The High-z Supernova Search Team at Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore. 10.51am: This explanation from the Nobel Assembly: In 1998, cosmology was shaken at its foundations as two research teams presented their findings. Headed by Saul Perlmutter, one of the teams had set to work in 1988. Brian Schmidt headed another team, launched at the end of 1994, where Adam Riess was to play a crucial role. The research teams raced to map the Universe by locating the most distant supernovae. More sophisticated telescopes on the ground and in space, as well as more powerful computers and new digital imaging sensors (CCD, Nobel Prize in Physics in 2009), opened the possibility in the 1990s to add more pieces to the cosmological puzzle. The teams used a particular kind of supernova, called type Ia supernova. It is an explosion of an old compact star that is as heavy as the Sun but as small as the Earth. A single such supernova can emit as much light as a whole galaxy. All in all, the two research teams found over 50 distant supernovae whose light was weaker than expected – this was a sign that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating. The potential pitfalls had been numerous, and the scientists found reassurance in the fact that both groups had reached the same astonishing conclusion. For almost a century, the Universe has been known to be expanding as a consequence of the Big Bang about 14 billion years ago. However, the discovery that this expansion is accelerating is astounding. If the expansion will continue to speed up the Universe will end in ice. The acceleration is thought to be driven by dark energy, but what that dark energy is remains an enigma – perhaps the greatest in physics today. What is known is that dark energy constitutes about three quarters of the Universe. Therefore the findings of the 2011 Nobel Laureates in Physics have helped to unveil a Universe that to a large extent is unknown to science. And everything is possible again. 10.50am: The prize is for discovering the expansion of the universe. 10.49am: From the Nobel Assembly: What will be the final destiny of the Universe? Probably it will end in ice, if we are to believe this year’s Nobel Laureates in Physics. They have studied several dozen exploding stars, called supernovae, and discovered that the Universe is expanding at an ever-accelerating rate. The discovery came as a complete surprise even to the Laureates themselves. 10.45am The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 goes to Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Adam G. Riess 10.45am: More Nobel prize trivia from @Nobelprize_org on twitter: Marie Curie received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903 and Chemistry in 1911. 10.44am: From @Nobelprize_org on twitter: Facts: 188 individuals have received the #NobelPrize in #Physics since 1901, among them, 2 are women. 10.40am: As @simonfrantz points out on twitter, the last female Laureate in physics was Maria Goeppert-Mayer in 1963 . 10.37am: There have been some regrettable Nobel awards in the past. Perhaps the most worrying was the award in 1949 to Dr Egas Moniz of Portugal for discovering the therapeutic value of lobotomy. The New England Journal of Medicine hailed the procedure as the birth of a “new psychiatry”. The prize led to a rise in lobotomies, which were therapeutically worthless. 10.35am: Here is the live stream of the Nobel prize announcement. 10.22am: And so to day two of Nobel prize week and the pundits have been busy with their predictions as to who will be honoured with today’s award for contributions to physics. The Nobel Assembly is due to announce the winner, or winners, some time after 10.45am BST. We will follow events live here. Yesterday, three scientists won the Nobel prize in medicine for groundbreaking work on the immune system. The award was overshadowed with the sad news that one of the recipients, Ralph Steinman at Rockefeller University in New York, passed away a few days ago. The Nobel assembly was unaware of this when the award was announced and has ruled that the prize will stand. The prize earns the winner or winners 10 million Swedish kronor, or £934,000. So who are the hot favourites for today’s prize in physics? According to the news agency Associated Press, physicists working on quantum entanglement – which underpins hopes for superfast quantum computing – are strong contenders for this year’s prize. Those predictions draw on “> names put forward by the citation company, Thomson Reuters , which failed to predict the winners of yesterday’s prize. Last year, the Nobel prize in physics was won by two Russian-born scientists, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov at Manchester University , for their experiments with graphene, the strongest and thinnest material known. Before becoming a Nobel prizewinner, Geim made headlines for levitating frogs , an achievement that earned him an Ig Nobel prize from the irreverent sister awards . The potential of graphene-based products prompted the UK government to announce a £50m Global Research and Technology Hub to commercialise graphene products. A live stream of the Nobel awards will appear here as soon as the video is available. Nobel prizes Science prizes Physics Particle physics Ian Sample guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Nobel Prize in Physics – live blog

The announcement from Stockholm of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics is imminent 11.04am: Brian Schmidt: “It seemed too crazy to be right so we were a little scared. “I always look to Einstein because he got a lot right. Einstein’s idea that space itself has an energy is the simplest reason that the universe could be speeding up.” 11.02am: Nobel prize winner Brian Schmidt answering questions: “It feels like when my children were born…” 10.57am: More from the Nobel Assembly’s material: The growing rate of the expansion implies that the Universe is being pushed apart by an unknown form of energy embedded in the fabric of space. This dark energy makes up a large part of the Universe, more than 70 %, and it is an enigma, perhaps the greatest in physics today. No wonder, then, that cosmology was shaken at its foundations when two different research groups presented similar results in 1998. 10.54am: All three are relative youngsters for the Nobel prize. Perlmutter was born in 1959, Schmidt in 1967 and Reiss in 1969. 10.53am: One half of the prize goes to Saul Perlmutter at the Supernova Cosmology Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley, California. The other half goes jointly to Brian Schmidt of the High-z Supernova Search Team at the Australian National University and Adam G. Riess at The High-z Supernova Search Team at Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore. 10.51am: This explanation from the Nobel Assembly: In 1998, cosmology was shaken at its foundations as two research teams presented their findings. Headed by Saul Perlmutter, one of the teams had set to work in 1988. Brian Schmidt headed another team, launched at the end of 1994, where Adam Riess was to play a crucial role. The research teams raced to map the Universe by locating the most distant supernovae. More sophisticated telescopes on the ground and in space, as well as more powerful computers and new digital imaging sensors (CCD, Nobel Prize in Physics in 2009), opened the possibility in the 1990s to add more pieces to the cosmological puzzle. The teams used a particular kind of supernova, called type Ia supernova. It is an explosion of an old compact star that is as heavy as the Sun but as small as the Earth. A single such supernova can emit as much light as a whole galaxy. All in all, the two research teams found over 50 distant supernovae whose light was weaker than expected – this was a sign that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating. The potential pitfalls had been numerous, and the scientists found reassurance in the fact that both groups had reached the same astonishing conclusion. For almost a century, the Universe has been known to be expanding as a consequence of the Big Bang about 14 billion years ago. However, the discovery that this expansion is accelerating is astounding. If the expansion will continue to speed up the Universe will end in ice. The acceleration is thought to be driven by dark energy, but what that dark energy is remains an enigma – perhaps the greatest in physics today. What is known is that dark energy constitutes about three quarters of the Universe. Therefore the findings of the 2011 Nobel Laureates in Physics have helped to unveil a Universe that to a large extent is unknown to science. And everything is possible again. 10.50am: The prize is for discovering the expansion of the universe. 10.49am: From the Nobel Assembly: What will be the final destiny of the Universe? Probably it will end in ice, if we are to believe this year’s Nobel Laureates in Physics. They have studied several dozen exploding stars, called supernovae, and discovered that the Universe is expanding at an ever-accelerating rate. The discovery came as a complete surprise even to the Laureates themselves. 10.45am The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 goes to Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Adam G. Riess 10.45am: More Nobel prize trivia from @Nobelprize_org on twitter: Marie Curie received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903 and Chemistry in 1911. 10.44am: From @Nobelprize_org on twitter: Facts: 188 individuals have received the #NobelPrize in #Physics since 1901, among them, 2 are women. 10.40am: As @simonfrantz points out on twitter, the last female Laureate in physics was Maria Goeppert-Mayer in 1963 . 10.37am: There have been some regrettable Nobel awards in the past. Perhaps the most worrying was the award in 1949 to Dr Egas Moniz of Portugal for discovering the therapeutic value of lobotomy. The New England Journal of Medicine hailed the procedure as the birth of a “new psychiatry”. The prize led to a rise in lobotomies, which were therapeutically worthless. 10.35am: Here is the live stream of the Nobel prize announcement. 10.22am: And so to day two of Nobel prize week and the pundits have been busy with their predictions as to who will be honoured with today’s award for contributions to physics. The Nobel Assembly is due to announce the winner, or winners, some time after 10.45am BST. We will follow events live here. Yesterday, three scientists won the Nobel prize in medicine for groundbreaking work on the immune system. The award was overshadowed with the sad news that one of the recipients, Ralph Steinman at Rockefeller University in New York, passed away a few days ago. The Nobel assembly was unaware of this when the award was announced and has ruled that the prize will stand. The prize earns the winner or winners 10 million Swedish kronor, or £934,000. So who are the hot favourites for today’s prize in physics? According to the news agency Associated Press, physicists working on quantum entanglement – which underpins hopes for superfast quantum computing – are strong contenders for this year’s prize. Those predictions draw on “> names put forward by the citation company, Thomson Reuters , which failed to predict the winners of yesterday’s prize. Last year, the Nobel prize in physics was won by two Russian-born scientists, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov at Manchester University , for their experiments with graphene, the strongest and thinnest material known. Before becoming a Nobel prizewinner, Geim made headlines for levitating frogs , an achievement that earned him an Ig Nobel prize from the irreverent sister awards . The potential of graphene-based products prompted the UK government to announce a £50m Global Research and Technology Hub to commercialise graphene products. A live stream of the Nobel awards will appear here as soon as the video is available. Nobel prizes Science prizes Physics Particle physics Ian Sample guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ore. Bus Driver Kicks Mother, Baby Off Bus

A driver in Oregon’s largest public transit agency berated a woman and her crying baby into getting off a bus in a Portland suburb, saying “I can’t drive with that noise,” another passenger said Monday. (Oct. 3)

Continue reading …