The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts liberal belief that the Swiftboat Vets' claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.
Continue reading …The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts liberal belief that the Swiftboat Vets' claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.
Continue reading …The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts liberal belief that the Swiftboat Vets' claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.
Continue reading …The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts believe that the Swiftboat Vets claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.
Continue reading …Our latest fundraising drive is currently underway! Without donations, we have no Political Carnival. We have no way to fight for you, for our principles, or just to make you laugh from time to time. Your donations truly help us … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Political Carnival Discovery Date : 10/07/2011 22:46 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …LUCKNOW, India (AP) — Rescuers searched through the wreckage of a packed express train for people trapped inside after it derailed in northern India on Sunday, killing at least 21 and injuring more than 100 others, officials said. The Kalka Mail train was on its way to Kalka, in the foothills of the Himalayas, from Howrah, a station near Kolkata in eastern India, when 12 coaches and the engine jumped… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 10/07/2011 17:20 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …Pentagon chief Leon Panetta spent Sunday afternoon at Camp Dwyer, a US outpost in southern Afghanistan before heading to Iraq. During his visit, he pinned Purple Heart medals on two Marines and had lunch with young officers. (July 10)
Continue reading …YouTuber ignoramusky’s little kitten does not know what to make of these apples, and it’s a valid concern. What would you do if you woke up and there were two things sitting on the bed ominously staring at you? You’d freak out, probably. You’d freak out a lot. The only thing more perfect than the little dude’s reaction to the fruit is the score to the video. WATCH: Via Viral Viral Videos
Continue reading …It is truly fascinating how liberal media members will do anything to protect the reputation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On this weekend's “McLaughlin Group,” Newsweek's Eleanor Clift revised history to largely absolve the two government-sponsored enterprises for last decade's mortgage collapse while predictably blaming it on Wall Street and of course George W. Bush (video follows with transcript and commentary): ELEANOR CLIFT, NEWSWEEK: Because Wall Street wants to make it look like Fannie and Freddie were the drivers behind the mortgage collapse, when in fact Wall Street led the way and Fannie and Freddie basically caught up. I think, you know, Fannie and Freddie were the product of government policy, both parties, and President Bush championed the ownership society, and pushing low-cost mortgages were part of the Republican inroad into the Hispanic community. So this wreaks of politics, but you cannot say that Fannie and Freddie led the way with all those financial instruments. Fannie and Freddie got into the act when they lost a great section of the mortgage market because Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch and everybody else was trading on these financial instruments, and, and, and the unregulation allowed them to go ahead. So, they were, they were part of the crowd, but they did not, they did not lead the way. The “Wall Street” character Gordon Gecko famously said, “A fool and his money are lucky to get together in the first place.” I'd love to know what he'd say about this nincompoop. To claim that Fannie and Freddie weren't leaders in expanding the mortgage market that led to the housing bubble and the eventual near collapse of the entire financial services industry is addle-minded even for Eleanor. To quickly refute her claim, let's cite a source she trusts; in September 1999, the New York Times reported : In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders. The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets — including the New York metropolitan region — will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits. Readers are advised that this was months before the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 was enacted largely deregulating financial institutions to do virtually whatever they wanted, and roughly fifteen months before the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 deregulated derivatives. As such, it is quite absurd to say Fannie and Freddie didn't lead the way in driving the mortgage bubble or that George W. Bush played a significant role. But there's more in this Times piece that folks like Clift conveniently ignore: In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's. ''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.'' By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings. Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites. So, back in September 1999, under pressure from the Clinton administration to make more loans to minority and low-income home owners with bad credit ratings, Fannie eased the credit requirements on loans it would purchase. At the same time, someone familiar with the industry was cautioning that such a move would force a government rescue of the GSE if the economy slumped. As we all now know, the rest is history except for folks like Clift who feel they need to revise it in order to protect the institutions and the Party they so deeply adore. Nice try, Eleanor.
Continue reading …Via Pension Pulse. It’s Sunday and I’m back in reflection mode. Actually, I’m hung over. Went out last night, my buddies stood me up, but I ended up having a great time with two smart, beautiful single Greek ladies. A bit too good of a time as we drank it up at the bar and cracked jokes all night long. I had a blast comparing notes on the singles scene (learned that women are now worse than men!)…. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : zero hedge Discovery Date : 10/07/2011 18:40 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …