Scottish government launches investigation into safety procedures after worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade Shell has finally stopped the leak from its faulty oil pipeline in the North Sea, ending the flow of oil undersea after 10 days of the worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade. Divers closed a relief valve which was the source of a small secondary leak , discovered after the first major leak in the pipeline at the Gannet Alpha platform had been plugged last week . Government officials are now opening an investigation into how the leak occurred and whether the correct procedures were followed. They will also have to decide whether Shell should pay for government expenses incurred in the clean-up operation . Shell now has to decide how to deal with the pipeline, which could still contain as much as 660 tonnes of oil with the potential for much more damage than the 218 tonnes of oil thought to have spilled into the sea already. “Closing the valve is a key step,” said Glen Cayley, technical director of Shell’s exploration and production activities in Europe, based in Aberdeen. “It was a careful and complex operation conducted by skilled divers, with support from our technical teams onshore. But we will be watching the line closely over the next 24 hours and beyond.” The UK government has said a containment structure should be built over the affected part of the pipeline, to ensure that no more oil emerges as the pipeline is dealt with. Cayley said removing the residual oil from the pipeline, which has been depressurised and is now held to the seafloor by “rock mattresses”, would “take time”. The company could not say how long, nor does it yet know the cause of the leak. News of the leak’s shutoff came late on Friday afternoon, as the Scottish government prepared to launch an investigation into how the spill occurred. The procurator fiscal will begin formal interviews next week with Shell staff, including divers, and others involved in the attempts to minimise the damage. Conservation groups have warned that marine life in the area could be harmed, and fishermen have been told to stay clear of the Gannet Alpha platform– 112 miles east of Aberdeen– and the surrounding area. Shell has also been criticised for a lack of transparency, as the leak was first detected last Wednesday but not made public until last Friday night. The marine coastguard has estimated that the oil on the sea surface covers about 6.7 sq km. Shell is maintaining three vessels on site as it repairs the damage, with dispersants and specialised oil spill response equipment if needed. Vicky Wyatt, senior oil campaigner for Greenpeace , said: “While we’ll be keeping a careful eye on whether the leak really is plugged as Shell claims, it’s obvious that the more we learn about what is supposed to be a gold standard operation, the more you worry whether Shell can be trusted to drill in the remote and fragile Arctic. Here in the UK, the government must now take the lead and immediately call a halt to all future applications for deep sea oil exploration, and in particular the wave of new licenses for the environmentally fragile region off the cost of the Shetlands.” Marine Scotland is continuing to send planes and vessels to survey the area around the leak, though government advisers take the view that the risk of serious damage to the environment and marine life is small. Last year’s BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico was estimated to be spilling up to 70,000 barrels a day, compared with the 1,300 barrels thought to have been released in the Shell spill. The Guardian has discovered that oil spills happen in the North Sea at the rate of about one a week, but most are minor. Oil spills Royal Dutch Shell Scotland Greenpeace Oil Oil and gas companies Wildlife Activism Oceans Fossil fuels Energy Climate change Energy industry Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Scottish government launches investigation into safety procedures after worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade Shell has finally stopped the leak from its faulty oil pipeline in the North Sea, ending the flow of oil undersea after 10 days of the worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade. Divers closed a relief valve which was the source of a small secondary leak , discovered after the first major leak in the pipeline at the Gannet Alpha platform had been plugged last week . Government officials are now opening an investigation into how the leak occurred and whether the correct procedures were followed. They will also have to decide whether Shell should pay for government expenses incurred in the clean-up operation . Shell now has to decide how to deal with the pipeline, which could still contain as much as 660 tonnes of oil with the potential for much more damage than the 218 tonnes of oil thought to have spilled into the sea already. “Closing the valve is a key step,” said Glen Cayley, technical director of Shell’s exploration and production activities in Europe, based in Aberdeen. “It was a careful and complex operation conducted by skilled divers, with support from our technical teams onshore. But we will be watching the line closely over the next 24 hours and beyond.” The UK government has said a containment structure should be built over the affected part of the pipeline, to ensure that no more oil emerges as the pipeline is dealt with. Cayley said removing the residual oil from the pipeline, which has been depressurised and is now held to the seafloor by “rock mattresses”, would “take time”. The company could not say how long, nor does it yet know the cause of the leak. News of the leak’s shutoff came late on Friday afternoon, as the Scottish government prepared to launch an investigation into how the spill occurred. The procurator fiscal will begin formal interviews next week with Shell staff, including divers, and others involved in the attempts to minimise the damage. Conservation groups have warned that marine life in the area could be harmed, and fishermen have been told to stay clear of the Gannet Alpha platform– 112 miles east of Aberdeen– and the surrounding area. Shell has also been criticised for a lack of transparency, as the leak was first detected last Wednesday but not made public until last Friday night. The marine coastguard has estimated that the oil on the sea surface covers about 6.7 sq km. Shell is maintaining three vessels on site as it repairs the damage, with dispersants and specialised oil spill response equipment if needed. Vicky Wyatt, senior oil campaigner for Greenpeace , said: “While we’ll be keeping a careful eye on whether the leak really is plugged as Shell claims, it’s obvious that the more we learn about what is supposed to be a gold standard operation, the more you worry whether Shell can be trusted to drill in the remote and fragile Arctic. Here in the UK, the government must now take the lead and immediately call a halt to all future applications for deep sea oil exploration, and in particular the wave of new licenses for the environmentally fragile region off the cost of the Shetlands.” Marine Scotland is continuing to send planes and vessels to survey the area around the leak, though government advisers take the view that the risk of serious damage to the environment and marine life is small. Last year’s BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico was estimated to be spilling up to 70,000 barrels a day, compared with the 1,300 barrels thought to have been released in the Shell spill. The Guardian has discovered that oil spills happen in the North Sea at the rate of about one a week, but most are minor. Oil spills Royal Dutch Shell Scotland Greenpeace Oil Oil and gas companies Wildlife Activism Oceans Fossil fuels Energy Climate change Energy industry Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Scottish government launches investigation into safety procedures after worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade Shell has finally stopped the leak from its faulty oil pipeline in the North Sea, ending the flow of oil undersea after 10 days of the worst oil spill in UK waters for a decade. Divers closed a relief valve which was the source of a small secondary leak , discovered after the first major leak in the pipeline at the Gannet Alpha platform had been plugged last week . Government officials are now opening an investigation into how the leak occurred and whether the correct procedures were followed. They will also have to decide whether Shell should pay for government expenses incurred in the clean-up operation . Shell now has to decide how to deal with the pipeline, which could still contain as much as 660 tonnes of oil with the potential for much more damage than the 218 tonnes of oil thought to have spilled into the sea already. “Closing the valve is a key step,” said Glen Cayley, technical director of Shell’s exploration and production activities in Europe, based in Aberdeen. “It was a careful and complex operation conducted by skilled divers, with support from our technical teams onshore. But we will be watching the line closely over the next 24 hours and beyond.” The UK government has said a containment structure should be built over the affected part of the pipeline, to ensure that no more oil emerges as the pipeline is dealt with. Cayley said removing the residual oil from the pipeline, which has been depressurised and is now held to the seafloor by “rock mattresses”, would “take time”. The company could not say how long, nor does it yet know the cause of the leak. News of the leak’s shutoff came late on Friday afternoon, as the Scottish government prepared to launch an investigation into how the spill occurred. The procurator fiscal will begin formal interviews next week with Shell staff, including divers, and others involved in the attempts to minimise the damage. Conservation groups have warned that marine life in the area could be harmed, and fishermen have been told to stay clear of the Gannet Alpha platform– 112 miles east of Aberdeen– and the surrounding area. Shell has also been criticised for a lack of transparency, as the leak was first detected last Wednesday but not made public until last Friday night. The marine coastguard has estimated that the oil on the sea surface covers about 6.7 sq km. Shell is maintaining three vessels on site as it repairs the damage, with dispersants and specialised oil spill response equipment if needed. Vicky Wyatt, senior oil campaigner for Greenpeace , said: “While we’ll be keeping a careful eye on whether the leak really is plugged as Shell claims, it’s obvious that the more we learn about what is supposed to be a gold standard operation, the more you worry whether Shell can be trusted to drill in the remote and fragile Arctic. Here in the UK, the government must now take the lead and immediately call a halt to all future applications for deep sea oil exploration, and in particular the wave of new licenses for the environmentally fragile region off the cost of the Shetlands.” Marine Scotland is continuing to send planes and vessels to survey the area around the leak, though government advisers take the view that the risk of serious damage to the environment and marine life is small. Last year’s BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico was estimated to be spilling up to 70,000 barrels a day, compared with the 1,300 barrels thought to have been released in the Shell spill. The Guardian has discovered that oil spills happen in the North Sea at the rate of about one a week, but most are minor. Oil spills Royal Dutch Shell Scotland Greenpeace Oil Oil and gas companies Wildlife Activism Oceans Fossil fuels Energy Climate change Energy industry Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media And the hits just keep on coming from Michele Bachmann . From Greg Sargent at The Plum Line — Bachmann on why she worked for IRS: “First rule of war is `know your enemy’” : This is fun. Michele Bachmann, on the campaign trail today, offered what seems to be a new explanation for her previous work as a lawyer for the Internal Revenue Service, something that has drawn some ire from the right. Her explanation: She worked for the IRS as a kind of secret anti-tax mole whose mission was to get to know the place in order to better undermine it later. As she put it: “The first rule of war is `know your enemy.’” This explanation seems a bit at odds with descriptions of the episode she’s given on previous occasions, when she’s said her anti-tax fervor was the result of her work for the IRS. This version on the trail explains her work for the IRS — which spanned four years, from 1988-1992 — in a way that will be more acceptable to hard-core anti-tax conservatives. Bachmann, speaking at a rally today in South Carolina, said: “We change the economy by changing the tax code. How many of you love the IRS? No! It’s time to change it. I went to work in that system because the first rule of war is ‘know your enemy.’ So I went to the inside to learn how they work because I wanted to beat them.” Read on… Chris Matthews made this part of his Sideshow segment this Thursday and asked if she was “running for president now to infiltrate the enemy, yet again?”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media And the hits just keep on coming from Michele Bachmann . From Greg Sargent at The Plum Line — Bachmann on why she worked for IRS: “First rule of war is `know your enemy’” : This is fun. Michele Bachmann, on the campaign trail today, offered what seems to be a new explanation for her previous work as a lawyer for the Internal Revenue Service, something that has drawn some ire from the right. Her explanation: She worked for the IRS as a kind of secret anti-tax mole whose mission was to get to know the place in order to better undermine it later. As she put it: “The first rule of war is `know your enemy.’” This explanation seems a bit at odds with descriptions of the episode she’s given on previous occasions, when she’s said her anti-tax fervor was the result of her work for the IRS. This version on the trail explains her work for the IRS — which spanned four years, from 1988-1992 — in a way that will be more acceptable to hard-core anti-tax conservatives. Bachmann, speaking at a rally today in South Carolina, said: “We change the economy by changing the tax code. How many of you love the IRS? No! It’s time to change it. I went to work in that system because the first rule of war is ‘know your enemy.’ So I went to the inside to learn how they work because I wanted to beat them.” Read on… Chris Matthews made this part of his Sideshow segment this Thursday and asked if she was “running for president now to infiltrate the enemy, yet again?”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media And the hits just keep on coming from Michele Bachmann . From Greg Sargent at The Plum Line — Bachmann on why she worked for IRS: “First rule of war is `know your enemy’” : This is fun. Michele Bachmann, on the campaign trail today, offered what seems to be a new explanation for her previous work as a lawyer for the Internal Revenue Service, something that has drawn some ire from the right. Her explanation: She worked for the IRS as a kind of secret anti-tax mole whose mission was to get to know the place in order to better undermine it later. As she put it: “The first rule of war is `know your enemy.’” This explanation seems a bit at odds with descriptions of the episode she’s given on previous occasions, when she’s said her anti-tax fervor was the result of her work for the IRS. This version on the trail explains her work for the IRS — which spanned four years, from 1988-1992 — in a way that will be more acceptable to hard-core anti-tax conservatives. Bachmann, speaking at a rally today in South Carolina, said: “We change the economy by changing the tax code. How many of you love the IRS? No! It’s time to change it. I went to work in that system because the first rule of war is ‘know your enemy.’ So I went to the inside to learn how they work because I wanted to beat them.” Read on… Chris Matthews made this part of his Sideshow segment this Thursday and asked if she was “running for president now to infiltrate the enemy, yet again?”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media And the hits just keep on coming from Michele Bachmann . From Greg Sargent at The Plum Line — Bachmann on why she worked for IRS: “First rule of war is `know your enemy’” : This is fun. Michele Bachmann, on the campaign trail today, offered what seems to be a new explanation for her previous work as a lawyer for the Internal Revenue Service, something that has drawn some ire from the right. Her explanation: She worked for the IRS as a kind of secret anti-tax mole whose mission was to get to know the place in order to better undermine it later. As she put it: “The first rule of war is `know your enemy.’” This explanation seems a bit at odds with descriptions of the episode she’s given on previous occasions, when she’s said her anti-tax fervor was the result of her work for the IRS. This version on the trail explains her work for the IRS — which spanned four years, from 1988-1992 — in a way that will be more acceptable to hard-core anti-tax conservatives. Bachmann, speaking at a rally today in South Carolina, said: “We change the economy by changing the tax code. How many of you love the IRS? No! It’s time to change it. I went to work in that system because the first rule of war is ‘know your enemy.’ So I went to the inside to learn how they work because I wanted to beat them.” Read on… Chris Matthews made this part of his Sideshow segment this Thursday and asked if she was “running for president now to infiltrate the enemy, yet again?”
Continue reading …The Engadget Show is live again, tonight, starting at 6:00PM ET ! Not only will it be filmed live in New York City, it will be streaming live to you on these very internets. Lock your browser in to this address at that time and you’ll receive yourself a visual treat and an information smorgasbord. We’ll be looking at RIM’s latest smartphones and seeing how they fare, taking a trip to Italy to get a peek at what the Ferrari of 2030 might look like, chatting with Fusion Garage’s Chandra Rathakrishnan about the Grid 10 and Grid 4 (and why his company deserves a second chance), taking over Times Square , and chatting with the EFF to figure out just what the heck Google is going to do with all those patents . Again, it’ll be live here at 6:00PM ET. Hop past the break for times in your timezone. Continue reading The Engadget Show is live, here at 6:00PM ET! The Engadget Show is live, here at 6:00PM ET! originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Activists say that at least 13 people have been killed by Syrian security forces as thousands protest in the streets Syrian security forces fired at thousands of protesters who poured into the streets throughout the country on Friday, killing at least 13 people the day after the US and its European allies demanded that President Bashar al-Assad step down, activists said. They claimed that soldiers, tanks and armoured personnel carriers were deployed in restive cities, despite Assad’s assurances to UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon that military and police operations had stopped. The harsh statements by President Barack Obama and European leaders also appeared to have no immediate effect. Asked whether the UN chief believes Assad when he says the violence has stopped, UN deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said: “He believes that any claim that violence has stopped needs to be verified. We continue to hear some disturbing reports that we would need to look into. And, of course, for that to happen we would like to have access for our human rights team.” Syria’s UN ambassador Bashar Ja’afari said a UN humanitarian assessment team would arrive in Damascus on Saturday. The London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Co-ordination Committees (LCC), an activist group, said demonstrations took place in the capital Damascus, the central city of Homs, the southern province of Deraa, the coastal city of Latakia, the eastern city of Deir Ezzor and other areas. The observatory said five people were killed in the southern village of Ghabagheb, five in the nearby village of Hirak and one each in Homs and the southern villages of Inkhil and Nawa. The LCC also said that 13 people were killed in different areas, mostly in the south of the country. It was impossible to independently verify the death toll because Syria has banned foreign reporters and restricted coverage by local media. Russia, a longtime ally of Syria, threw its support behind Assad, saying it doesn’t back western calls for him to resign. Moscow said the Syrian leader must be given sufficient time to fulfil promises of reforms. Russia’s foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Assad has already made some steps toward reform, including lifting the decades old state of emergency and issuing a decree allowing peaceful demonstrations. On Thursday, Obama said Assad has overseen a vicious onslaught of his people as they protested for freedom. It was Obama’s first explicit call for Assad to step down. Obama said Assad’s calls for reform ring hollow while he is “imprisoning, torturing and slaughtering his own people”. Obama also signed an executive order that gives his administration authority to impose sweeping new sanctions on Syria intended to further isolate Assad. The leaders of France, Britain and Germany issued a statement saying Assad should “leave power in the greater interests of Syria and the unity of his people”. Friday’s shooting came three days after troops finished a four-day military operation in Latakia mostly in an area in and around a Palestinian refugee camp, forcing thousands of refugees to flee. The UN agency that aids Palestinian refugees said it has found about 6,000 of the 7,500 refugees displaced by the fighting. The agency has been helping them with cash grants for food, medicine and accommodation. “Many, particularly the children and women, are traumatised and in a poor condition,” said agency spokesman Chris Gunness. “The refugees are too frightened to return to their homes.” Protests also erupted on Thursday night – part of a growing trend of evening protests when security forces tend to thin out. The observatory and the LCC said shootings on Thursday killed one person in a Damascus suburb and another died of his wounds early on Friday in the central city of Homs. Syrian state TV said gunmen shot dead one policeman and wounded four in the Damascus suburb of Harasta while four policemen were wounded in Inkhil on Friday. Rami Abdul-Rahman, who heads the observatory, said there was wide security deployment including armoured personnel carriers. “I’ve seen soldiers walking through the streets of the city,” said an activist in Homs. “But I can’t hear gunfire, and I don’t believe they are shooting.” Assad is coming under mounting criticism for his crackdown on a five-month uprising. Human rights groups and witnesses accuse Syrian troops of firing on largely unarmed protesters and say more than 1,800 civilians have been killed since mid-March. Activists posted an amateur video online showing two soldiers in uniform slapping and kicking about a dozen detainees inside a bus and forcing them to chant “our souls, our blood we sacrifice for you, Bashar,” and “God, Syria and Bashar only”. Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Bashar Al-Assad Palestinian territories Barack Obama Ban Ki-moon United Nations Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Katrin let us know about this great clip from PBS News Hour (and posted at Boing Boing ) about inequality and Americans’ perceptions about how wealth is distributed in the U.S. It’s a great clip: PBS posted the pie charts used in the video as well. ( View original at http://thesocietypages.org/socimages ) Katrin let us know about this great clip from PBS News Hour (and posted at Boing Boing ) about… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Sociological Images Discovery Date : 18/08/2011 13:42 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …