While we figure that giant, tread-wielding wheelchairs have no trouble selling themselves, a disabled man named Jim Starr is helping them along their merry way — a story about his TankChair being rejected for street use by UK authorities is giving the company plenty of free advertising. That’s not to say that we don’t feel for the disabled father of two, and hope he gets to use his snow-crushing, beach-mashing wheelchair in peace — it’s just not particularly surprising that a non-standard vehicle would be illegal to use on public roadways, and as you’ll see in the video after the break, the law doesn’t seem to be restraining him any. Continue reading TankChair deemed too heavy to use on UK streets, disabled man becomes marketing boon (video) TankChair deemed too heavy to use on UK streets, disabled man becomes marketing boon (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:37:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Jack LaLanne, the fitness guru who inspired television viewers to trim down and pump iron for decades before exercise became a national obsession, died Sunday. He was 96. (Jan. 23)
Continue reading …I really thought he’d live forever. R.I.P.: MORRO BAY, Calif. — Fitness guru Jack LaLanne (lah-LAYN’), who inspired television viewers to trim down and pump iron decades before exercise became a national obsession, has died at age 96. His agent, … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Political Carnival Discovery Date : 24/01/2011 03:42 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …Click here to view this media (h/t Heather) Aw, isn’t it the sweetest? Eric Cantor insists on standing by his man, Paul Ryan, telling Meet the Press host David Gregory that the Republicans must “embrace” Ryan’s Roadmap for America . DAVID GREGORY: How about– and– and the irony– of Paul Ryan being introduced as the budget chairman– and he’s doing the response to the State of the Union. He is the one who’s proposed draconian– cuts to– REP. ERIC CANTOR: Right. DAVID GREGORY: –Social Security and to Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: And Republicans don’t stand behind him. REP. ERIC CANTOR: That’s not true. I just told you that– we put a chapter in our book about it because the direction in which the road map goes is something we need– we need to embrace. Actually, it *is* true and as Jon Perr writes, Cantor can’t hide his “Ryan eyes” : During the 2010 midterm elections, John Boehner’s ” GOP Pledge to America ” took those two popular programs off the table when it came to his now broken $100 billion budget cut promise . The much-hyped Republican Study Committee plan to slash $2.5 trillion in discretionary spending for Democratic priorities similarly includes what Boehner’s Pledge deemed “common-sense exceptions for seniors.” And throughout the fall campaign , the same Republican Party that tried to kill Medicare in the 1960′s and gut it in the 1990′s falsely accused Democrats wanting to cut benefits to 46 million American elderly. Which is why Paul Ryan’s Roadmap for America makes the Republican leadership queasy. Because while most no doubt agree in principle with Ryan’s ” slash and privatize ” agenda, they are terrified of saying so on the record. In February, House Minority Leader John Boehner distanced himself from Ryan’s Roadmap, saying, “it’s his.” In July , Boehner grumbled, “There are parts of it that are well done,” adding, “Other parts I have some doubts about, in terms of how good the policy is.” And with good reason. With its draconian spending cuts, Medicare rationing, tax cuts for the rich and Social Security privatization, a GOP platform based on Ryan’s Roadmap would about as popular as the Ebola virus. As the Washington Post put it: Many Republican colleagues, who, even as they praise Ryan for his doggedness, privately consider the Roadmap a path to electoral disaster… The discomfort some Republicans feel for Ryan’s proposals goes beyond November. If Republicans were to take control of Congress next year, Ryan will rise to chairman of the Budget Committee. He could use the position to hold colleagues accountable for runaway budget deficits and make it more difficult for fellow Republicans — and Democrats — to stuff bills with expensive projects that add to the problem. Why is it that Republicans love to say that “everything is on the table” but the only thing that actually ever gets mentioned is the two most successful programs for the average American and cutting for those who can least afford it? Let’s be clear: Social Security is NOT an entitlement–it’s a trust. Nor will it ever be insolvent if the income cap is removed. That’s all it would take, but instead we have Republicans preaching austerity measures for senior citizens as if that would solve all our economic woes. Idiots . Every fair-minded analysis makes clear that Ryan’s roadmap is a right-wing fantasy , slashing taxes on the rich while raising taxes for everyone else . The plan calls for privatizing Social Security and gutting Medicare , and fails miserably in its intended goal — cutting the deficit. As Paul Krugman explained , the Ryan plan “is a fraud that makes no useful contribution to the debate over America’s fiscal future.” I really hope that the Republicans keep going along this track. The Republican voter is typically older and let’s see how much support they can count on when they go after Social Security and Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: Let’s talk about Social Security. A couple weeks ago– Majority Leader Reid in the Senate was on the program and I asked him about whether Social Security is in crisis. This is what he said. (VIDEO CLIP NOT TRANSCRIBED) DAVID GREGORY: If you disagree with Leader Reid are you prepared to raise the retirement age, means test, benefits or in– another way seriously tackle the entitlement of Social Security? REP. ERIC CANTOR: David, what we have said is we’ve got a serious fiscal train wreck coming for this country if we don’t deal with these entitlements. And so entitlements are something that we need to begin to work on. Now for me the first entitlement we need to deal with– is the healthcare bill. Is the Obamacare bill. DAVID GREGORY: We’ll get to healthcare. I asked you– REP. ERIC CANTOR: You know– DAVID GREGORY:–about Social Security now. REP. ERIC CANTOR: And– absolutely. And– and– and so we have got to– focus– on what we can do together. Now as you s– as– as that just indicated, the Senate is not willing to do anything under Harry Reid. DAVID GREGORY: What are you willing to do? Means test benefits? Raise the retirement age? REP. ERIC CANTOR: David, we’ve– we have a program that we have seen one of our members, Paul Ryan, the chairman of the budget committee, put together called the Road Map. And he and Kevin McCarthy and I wrote a book together. And in that book we reserved a chapter for discussion– about Social Security, about Medicare, and how we can begin to at least discuss DAVID GREGORY: Well, what are you for? REP. ERIC CANTOR: –to do that. DAVID GREGORY: Leader, I’m asking you what you’re for. REP. ERIC CANTOR: What– what– what I’m telling you we’re for is we’re for an active discussion to see what we can together– DAVID GREGORY: How– REP. ERIC CANTOR: –and do. DAVID GREGORY: –discussion Social Security and what is happening has been discussed for years. REP. ERIC CANTOR: Well– DAVID GREGORY: How about– and– and the irony– of Paul Ryan being introduced as the budget chairman– and he’s doing the response to the State of the Union. He is the one who’s proposed draconian– cuts to– REP. ERIC CANTOR: Right. DAVID GREGORY: –Social Security and to Medicare. DAVID GREGORY: And Republicans don’t stand behind him. REP. ERIC CANTOR: That’s not true. I just told you that– we put a chapter in our book about it because the direction in which the road map goes is something we need– we need to embrace. Now let me tell you this– DAVID GREGORY: Raise the retirement age? Means testing benefits? Those are the specifics. REP. ERIC CANTOR: The fundamental– the starting point in any plan has got to be we need to distinguish between those– at or nearing retirement. Anyone 55 and older in this country has got to know– that their Social Security benefits will not be addressed. Will not be changed. It is for all the younger people, the– those 54 and younger, we’re gonna have to have a serious discussion. Now with Harry Reid talking about the fact that he doesn’t wanna even discuss it, that’s not leadership.
Continue reading …Every two weeks, the Media Research Center compiles the most outrageous liberal media quotes for our Notable Quotables newsletter. For the issue dated Monday, January 24, it’s a special edition, “ Conservatives in the Crosshairs ,” documenting the smarmy attempt by the liberal media to link conservatives — especially Sarah Palin, talk radio and the Tea Party — to the horrific shooting of U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords that left six others dead. After the jump, you'll find some of the choicer quotes we’ve uncovered, including three video clips. The full issue will be available at www.MRC.org by 9am Monday: First Impulse: Let’s Blame Conservatives Arizona Daily Star columnist/cartoonist David Fitzsimmons: “I must tell you as a columnist who has covered politics in this state, it was inevitable, from my perspective.” Anchor Martin Savidge: “Why do you say that?” Fitzsimmons: “Because the right in Arizona, and I’m speaking very broadly, has been stoking the fires of a heated anger and rage successfully in this state….The politics of the state does tend to be far to the right. I would say even rabid right.” — Exchange at about 2:30pm ET during CNN’s live coverage of the Giffords shooting, January 8. Fitzsimmons later conceded his remarks were “inappropriate.” “Remember, this is the deepest fear that was in the back of everybody’s mind going through the health care debate. A lot of members were threatened. Congresswoman Giffords’ windows at her district office were broken….There is [sic] a lot of fringe groups that were very upset with the health care law, felt that the federal government was overstepping its bounds, and that was in — within everyone’s mind. It looks sadly like it’s come to fruition today.” — NBC/MSNBC correspondent Luke Russert during MSNBC live coverage at about 3:30pm ET January 8. “We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was. She’s been the target of violence before….Her father says that ‘the whole Tea Party’ was her enemy. And yes, she was on Sarah Palin’s infamous ‘crosshairs’ list. Just yesterday, Ezra Klein remarked that opposition to health reform was getting scary. Actually, it’s been scary for quite a while, in a way that already reminded many of us of the climate that preceded the Oklahoma City bombing….Violent acts are what happen when you create a climate of hate. And it’s long past time for the GOP’s leaders to take a stand against the hate-mongers.” — New York Times columnist Paul Krugman in a 3:22pm ET January 8 blog posting , less than two hours after news broke of Giffords’ shooting.
Continue reading …From The Archives: Legendary graphic designer Saul Bass’s 1968 Academy Award-winning short-subject documentary Why Man Creates — an abbreviated version of which was featured on the first edition of 60 Minutes — was recently uploaded to YouTube in full. Worth it for Bass’s animated summary of human history alone (starts @ 0:58). Part 2 below: [ boingboing .] Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 23/01/2011 20:47 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …The Epoch Times adds this subhead to their story — US humiliated in eyes of Chinese by song used to inspire anti-Americanism: Lang Lang the pianist says he chose it. Chairman Hu Jintao recognized it as soon as he heard it. Patriotic Chinese Internet users were delighted as soon as they saw the videos online. Early morning TV viewers in China knew it would be played an hour or two beforehand. At the… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 23/01/2011 20:40 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …The Epoch Times adds this subhead to their story — US humiliated in eyes of Chinese by song used to inspire anti-Americanism: Lang Lang the pianist says he chose it. Chairman Hu Jintao recognized it as soon as he heard it. Patriotic Chinese Internet users were delighted as soon as they saw the videos online. Early morning TV viewers in China knew it would be played an hour or two beforehand. At the… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 23/01/2011 20:40 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …Many iPhone owners lament at the fact Apple restricts the ability to customise iOS devices, it was only a recent update that allowed iPhone and iPod Touch users to set a background wallpaper on the home screen. iOS users aren’t officially allowed to change themes, amend the app icons or change fonts, but that doesn’t Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Next Web Discovery Date : 23/01/2011 18:36 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …Monday's premiere episode of NBC's new legal drama “Harry's Law” took a cheap shot at conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh. As the show's star Kathy Bates argued for the legalization of drugs while her client was being cross-examined by a totally hapless district attorney, she claimed the idea was first raised by Republicans, “When the party had thinkers, before it was hijacked by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, a drug addict himself” (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): KATHY BATES AS HARRIET “HARRY” KORN: It’s a billion dollar trade because it’s illegal. PAUL MCCRANE AS PROSECUTOR: Objection. BATES: Maybe we should decriminalize if your goal is… MCCRANE: Wait, did you actually just say that? Did you actually just say that? BATES: I believe I did. I believe I did. MCCRANE: What, do you want to just pass drugs out on the street? Is that… BATES: That's where they're passed out now, at a thousand times the pharmaceutical cost. MCCRANE: Move to strike. BATES: And if we legalize drugs, addicts would need less than two cents on the dollar to support their habits. They'd hardly have to break into homes or cars or… MCCRANE: We have something called “values” in this country… BATES: And they should coincide with saving the innocent lives you were carrying on about. MCCRANE: You're seriously saying we should legalize drugs is the solution? BATES: Everybody commissioned to study the problem has said it. MCCRANE: Who? Everybody who? BATES: If we legalize them, we treat the disease instead of punishing it away. MCCRANE: Great, then you want to pass out needles, too? BATES: Perhaps, if you're against the spread of AIDS. Are you? MCCRANE: If we were to legalize drugs… BATES: We could neutralize the gangs, take the drug business out of the shadows. MCCRANE: And do what? Celebrate it? BATES: How about regulate it? Tax it? MCCRANE: Yes, and then every liberal in America could just light up and say, “Hallelujah, legalize drugs!” BATES: The idea was first raised by conservative Republicans. MCCRANE: Oh please. When? BATES: When the party had thinkers, before it was hijacked by the likes of Rush Limbaugh… MCCRANE: Here we go. BATES: …a drug addict himself. MCCRANE: Ancient history. BATES: Who somehow fared much better in our justice system – I wonder why. MCCRANE: The race card. There it is. BATES: Oh, if I wanted to play the race card, I'd talk about the disparity in sentencing. MCCRANE: Objection. BATES: But I'm not doing that. I’m keeping it about one kid only. He's sitting right there, and he's getting screwed! For those unfamiliar with the writer/producer of “Harry's Law,” he is none other than David Kelley. As NewsBusters has documented , his previous show “Boston Legal” was often a vehicle for anti-Conservative rants and messages. One of our favorites was in November 2008 when lead characters called McCain/Palin supporters idiots. So it seems that right from the opening episode of Kelley's new series – which was seen by eleven million viewers – he's making it clear his pattern of injecting liberal positions will continue. Even TV critic Tim Goodman was unimpressed with the theatrics as he noted in his Tuesday review ” Harry's Law is a Crime Against Good Television “: Does this now sound utterly and ridiculously like a Kelley show? Thought so. Beyond that, “Harry's Law” is littered with bogus courtroom rambling on soap boxes so tall they are an insurance claim waiting to happen. Let's legalize drugs, Harry goes off, and the next thing you know she's talking about stupid Republicans and Rush Limbaugh. It's all cheap, easy, predictable and not very clever. And, not at all realistic. As WNYMedia.net observed : Kelley’s absurdist series ask the viewer to wildly suspend disbelief as his defense lawyers bend the legal system and debate current event issues with prosecutors while judges sit by and let the sparks fly. Harriet will
Continue reading …