Home » Posts tagged with » msnbc (Page 4)
Starbucks’ CEO Schultz Brewing a Double-Shot of Politics in Your Venti Half-Caf

Are you a Starbucks Rewards Member? If you are, you probably got this awesome warm-and-fuzzy feeling email today about how you could help Starbucks help needy schools by funding Bill Gates’ DonorsChoose.org initiative. It all sounds great, doesn’t it? msnbc’s Morning Joe and Starbucks encourage you to support public schools through DonorsChoose.org. Starting October 4th, Starbucks retail stores and participating grocery stores will feature a select number of marked bags of Gold Coast Blend®- Morning Joe Edition coffee with $5 DonorsChoose.org donation stickers*. To direct funding to the public school classroom project of your choice visit DonorsChoose.org/starbucks**. [...and the fine print...] **Offer only available through codes found on specially-marked packages of Starbucks® Gold Coast Blend® – Morning Joe Edition coffee. We will donate $5 for every code entered through 12/31/2011, until $600,000 has been given. Enter your code at www.donorschoose.org/starbucks then choose a classroom project to receive the $5 donation. Codes expire on 12/31/2011 at 11:59 pm EST. Donations can only be directed to existing projects on DonorsChoose.org. Coffee purchases and this $5 donation are not tax-deductible. For promotional details and restrictions, visit www.donorschoose.org/starbucks. Awww, isn’t that nice? A special blend for the conservative dude on the so-called “liberal” channel, and all you have to do is buy it to send five bucks off to DonorsChoose.org, which until recently I supported for the most part. The idea behind DonorsChoose is for teachers to put up a wish list for their classrooms, and small donors to fulfill it with…small donations. This is all great except that it now includes charter schools, which already receive plenty of money from big donors, including a lot of very, very far right wing donors. It’s also symptomatic of a larger issue, which is the abject underfunding of our schools. What’s next? A $5 donation for every bag of Bill O’Reilly Decaf Blend? Or maybe the Erick Erickson Afternoon Teabag? Howard Schultz, as you may recall, is the kahuna behind the effort to de-fund certain candidates running for office by withholding contributions until they step up to his tune.. This would be just awesome for those of us who think corporate money has too much influence over politics, except that Schultz’ effort, if successful, would punish Democratic candidates at the local, state and federal levels while leaving conservative candidates to happily continue collecting their big donations at the door, given that Schultz and his friends are the sort of Third Way types who put a lot of money toward Democrats, but expect those Democrats to deliver corporate help. So maybe Schultz isn’t a conservative in liberals’ clothing. But the net effect of what might otherwise be a noble effort is to raise visibility to the one professed conservative on the MSNBC network with one effort, while starving Democratic candidates of donations on the other. We can argue all day long about whether or not it’s a good thing for Democrats to be starved of corporate donations. It may well be. But it certainly doesn’t bode well for competing in states where lots of conservative corporate money is landing. In honor of Schultz’ deeply charitable effort to pimp Joe Scarborough’s show, I’m going to make a donation to the Blue America candidates . Give up that Morning Joe blend and join me?

Continue reading …
Martin Bashir Blames GOP for Cantaloupe Food Poisoning Deaths

In an outrageous rant during his 3 p.m. ET hour show on MSNBC on Friday, host Martin Bashir actually attempted to blame budget cutting by Republican lawmakers for a deadly outbreak of listeria in cantaloupe: “John Boehner and his Republican majority decided to gut the food safety and inspection service….Cut, cut, cut. Now the results are in. 16 people have lost their lives.” Bashir went on to blame free market principles in general for the outbreak: “Republicans in Congress talk proudly of their commitment of laissez-faire economics, where government gets out of the way and everything works perfectly. You try telling that to those who ate melon with a side of listeria.” View video after the jump At the same time, Bashir portrayed President Obama as the would-be hero of the story, foiled by the villainous GOP: “Earlier this year, he signed the Food Safety Modernization Act into law….he actually tried to do something….But guess what actually happened? The proposal died on the vine.” [ Keeping the liberal media in check is hard work. Support NewsBusters by helping us reach our $5,000 fundraising goal. We have $1,500 left to go! To show our appreciation, we'll send you fun items like "I Don't Believe the Liberal Media" buttons and bumber stickers, or a Chris Matthews floormat. Donate now . ] Here is a full transcript of the September 30 segment: 3:23PM ET MARTIN BASHIR: Federal authorities now say that 16 people have died after eating cantaloupe infected with listeria. Among them, William Beach from Mustang, Oklahoma, seen here, who died at the age of 87. His wife found him collapsed on the living room floor struggling to breathe. At least 72 others have been sickened and authorities say those numbers, sadly, are expected to rise. And while the source of the outbreak has been identified, that doesn't resolve the root cause of the problem. For far too many years the safety of food in this country has been the subject of conjecture and each outbreak of E-coli or salmonella is always followed by cries for tougher safety standards. And the President heard those cries. Earlier this year, he signed the Food Safety Modernization Act into law, bringing about the largest change to this nation's food safety laws since the 1930s. Yes, he actually tried to do something about it. The President also called for an additional $120 million in funding in order to employ more inspectors so that cantaloupe for brunch would not mean admission to hospital by lunch. But guess what actually happened? The proposal died on the vine. Worse still, John Boehner and his Republican majority decided to gut the FDA's food safety and inspection service. First, slashing $87 million from its budget and then another $35 million from the USDA for good measure. Cut, cut, cut. And now the results are in. 16 people have lost their lives. Close to 100 are sick. Republicans in Congress talk proudly of their commitment of laissez-faire economics, where government gets out of the way and everything works perfectly. You try telling that to those who ate melon with a side of listeria. Throughout the weekend, you can get the latest from the show on Twitter at Twitter.com/BashirLive and Facebook at Facebook.com/Martin Bashir. Don't bother reaching for the stars. When we come back, the other programs Republicans want to cut.

Continue reading …
MSNBC’s Matthews, O’Donnell, Schultz and Sharpton Have Not Yet Mentioned Solyndra

Despite the growing scandal involving failed solar company Solyndra – now officially four weeks old – MSNBC's Chris Matthews, Lawrence O'Donnell, Ed Schultz, and Al Sharpton have still not reported the matter on their respective prime time programs. The only regular MSNBC host to mention this subject in prime time is Rachel Maddow who predictably discounted its importance Monday (transcript and commentary follow): RACHEL MADDOW: The federal government is quietly investing in renewable energy and making energy more affordable and more renewable. Happens in ways you don`t hear about much unless you read local business pages where federal money coming to town makes a big deal, makes a big difference. To the extent that Washington is talking about alternative energy right now at all, the talk has to do with a failed government loan to a company called Solyndra, a maker of solar panels. In 2009, Solyndra got a loan for more than half a billion dollars from the U.S. government. This month the company closed its plant, laid off more than 1,000 people and went bankrupt. Congress called its top executives to testify last week on Capitol Hill. The executives took the fifth. You can argue the Solyndra case any number of ways, whether President Bush was responsible for it since the loan started under him or whether you want to blame President Obama. Whether any administration should have known better to lend the Solyndra or whether this is just a bad bet in one of those public-private partnership that are never a sure thing but nevertheless elected officials are always saying, we need more of. Solyndra made headlines in the latest round of funding for electrification. Of course the dirty word of clean energy anymore. And this week, the conservative weekly, “The Weekly Standard” put President Obama on its cover as President Solyndra, that what they want to call him trying to reduce his own presidency to one loan to one failed maker of solar panels. But even as national conservatives want to make you feel bad about public investment in electricity, in energy, even some conservatives are pouring on the dollars for it in the states. The solar thing in particular makes sense to a lot of conservatives back home. Investing in infrastructure back home remains a core value. The same way it was a core value when the nation first started wiring our far flung farms. Just this month the Mississippi state legislature approved a $75 million loan to bring one maker of solar equipment to the state of Mississippi. Another solar company opened its doors in Mississippi this month with another 75 million bucks in loans and tax breaks from the state. The Republicans of Mississippi are very proud of this, very, very proud. Republican Lieutenant Governor Phil Bryant reported from the ribbon cutting. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) LT. GOV. PHIL BRYANT ( R), MISSISSIPPI: Going to see new high-tech energy moving ahead. The green type energy that we all believe will be part of the future. But don`t worry, we`re still going to drill for oil, we`re still going to use CO2. We`re still going to use coal in our clean coal plant. Our energy policy is all of the above and more jobs for Mississippi. (END VIDEO CLIP) MADDOW: Lieutenant governor of Mississippi so excited about solar that he reassures Mississippians they will still use CO2, which is actually just the pollution part of energy. It`s not the fuel. He is excited about solar. He`s excited about jobs. He is excited, dare I say, about the greener, brighter future of Mississippi. Made possible if comes to pass by the collective will of the taxpayers to invest in it facilitated by Republican politicians like him. There has not yet been a major Obama administration scandal, at least one that the Republicans like to harp on too much. They really want Solyndra to be a big Obama administration scandal. For that to work however, the country sort has to believe that investing in better electricity ideas is always a scam and that it feels like one to the American people. With our history, I think that is a tough sell. “They really want Solyndra to be a big Obama administration scandal.” This from a so-called journalist who's always supposed to love White House scandals as they typically drive ratings. I guess viewership isn't important when protecting a president you love takes precedence. On the other hand, at least Maddow mentioned something about this. After four weeks, her colleagues Matthews, O'Donnell, Schultz, and Sharpton still haven't said one word about this scandal. This despite the newest revelations about Solyndra having violated the terms of its loan last year. As the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday: Solyndra LLC had such steep financial problems in late 2010 that the company violated terms of its loan-guarantee agreement with the Department of Energy and technically defaulted on its $535 million loan, according to people familiar with the matter. The failed solar-panel maker, which is under numerous criminal and congressional investigations, ran so short of cash in December 2010 that it was unable to satisfy certain terms of its U.S. loan agreement, these people said. The agreement required Solyndra to provide $5 million in equity to a subsidiary building its factory but cash-flow problems prevented those payments. The Energy Department ultimately restructured the loan agreement to help keep the company afloat and Solyndra continued to draw money from its loan. Will this entice the other MSNBC hosts to mention Solyndra? Will anything short of someone blaming it on George W. Bush? Stay tuned.

Continue reading …
MSNBC’s Matthews, O’Donnell, Schultz and Sharpton Have Not Yet Mentioned Solyndra

Despite the growing scandal involving failed solar company Solyndra – now officially four weeks old – MSNBC's Chris Matthews, Lawrence O'Donnell, Ed Schultz, and Al Sharpton have still not reported the matter on their respective prime time programs. The only regular MSNBC host to mention this subject in prime time is Rachel Maddow who predictably discounted its importance Monday (transcript and commentary follow): RACHEL MADDOW: The federal government is quietly investing in renewable energy and making energy more affordable and more renewable. Happens in ways you don`t hear about much unless you read local business pages where federal money coming to town makes a big deal, makes a big difference. To the extent that Washington is talking about alternative energy right now at all, the talk has to do with a failed government loan to a company called Solyndra, a maker of solar panels. In 2009, Solyndra got a loan for more than half a billion dollars from the U.S. government. This month the company closed its plant, laid off more than 1,000 people and went bankrupt. Congress called its top executives to testify last week on Capitol Hill. The executives took the fifth. You can argue the Solyndra case any number of ways, whether President Bush was responsible for it since the loan started under him or whether you want to blame President Obama. Whether any administration should have known better to lend the Solyndra or whether this is just a bad bet in one of those public-private partnership that are never a sure thing but nevertheless elected officials are always saying, we need more of. Solyndra made headlines in the latest round of funding for electrification. Of course the dirty word of clean energy anymore. And this week, the conservative weekly, “The Weekly Standard” put President Obama on its cover as President Solyndra, that what they want to call him trying to reduce his own presidency to one loan to one failed maker of solar panels. But even as national conservatives want to make you feel bad about public investment in electricity, in energy, even some conservatives are pouring on the dollars for it in the states. The solar thing in particular makes sense to a lot of conservatives back home. Investing in infrastructure back home remains a core value. The same way it was a core value when the nation first started wiring our far flung farms. Just this month the Mississippi state legislature approved a $75 million loan to bring one maker of solar equipment to the state of Mississippi. Another solar company opened its doors in Mississippi this month with another 75 million bucks in loans and tax breaks from the state. The Republicans of Mississippi are very proud of this, very, very proud. Republican Lieutenant Governor Phil Bryant reported from the ribbon cutting. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) LT. GOV. PHIL BRYANT ( R), MISSISSIPPI: Going to see new high-tech energy moving ahead. The green type energy that we all believe will be part of the future. But don`t worry, we`re still going to drill for oil, we`re still going to use CO2. We`re still going to use coal in our clean coal plant. Our energy policy is all of the above and more jobs for Mississippi. (END VIDEO CLIP) MADDOW: Lieutenant governor of Mississippi so excited about solar that he reassures Mississippians they will still use CO2, which is actually just the pollution part of energy. It`s not the fuel. He is excited about solar. He`s excited about jobs. He is excited, dare I say, about the greener, brighter future of Mississippi. Made possible if comes to pass by the collective will of the taxpayers to invest in it facilitated by Republican politicians like him. There has not yet been a major Obama administration scandal, at least one that the Republicans like to harp on too much. They really want Solyndra to be a big Obama administration scandal. For that to work however, the country sort has to believe that investing in better electricity ideas is always a scam and that it feels like one to the American people. With our history, I think that is a tough sell. “They really want Solyndra to be a big Obama administration scandal.” This from a so-called journalist who's always supposed to love White House scandals as they typically drive ratings. I guess viewership isn't important when protecting a president you love takes precedence. On the other hand, at least Maddow mentioned something about this. After four weeks, her colleagues Matthews, O'Donnell, Schultz, and Sharpton still haven't said one word about this scandal. This despite the newest revelations about Solyndra having violated the terms of its loan last year. As the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday: Solyndra LLC had such steep financial problems in late 2010 that the company violated terms of its loan-guarantee agreement with the Department of Energy and technically defaulted on its $535 million loan, according to people familiar with the matter. The failed solar-panel maker, which is under numerous criminal and congressional investigations, ran so short of cash in December 2010 that it was unable to satisfy certain terms of its U.S. loan agreement, these people said. The agreement required Solyndra to provide $5 million in equity to a subsidiary building its factory but cash-flow problems prevented those payments. The Energy Department ultimately restructured the loan agreement to help keep the company afloat and Solyndra continued to draw money from its loan. Will this entice the other MSNBC hosts to mention Solyndra? Will anything short of someone blaming it on George W. Bush? Stay tuned.

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Lumps NRA in With ‘Crazy, Far-Right’ ‘Hatred’ of Obama

While running through his usual litany of attacks on anti-Obama conservatives, MSNBC's Chris Matthews on Tuesday included the National Rifle Association as part of the “crazy far-right” who “hate” Barack Obama. Matthews began by wondering, “What is it about Obama that inspires this kind of weird, zealous hatred?” He later added, ” Well, here's something, another strain of the crazy, far- right .” After referencing birthers and other groups, the Hardball anchor played a clip of NRA President Wayne LaPierre deriding the President's stated support of the Second Amendment as a “big, fat lie.” Talking to Republican strategist Ron Christie, Matthews bizarrely responded to LaPierre's comments: ” Ron, this- the language, 'lie,' 'conspiracy,' it's almost like, I don't know, Lincoln talking about what was going on in the Civil War below the Mason-Dixon line. I mean, this is Civil War talk about a president of the United States .” Matthews' anger at the NRA for suggesting that Obama is no friend of the Second Amendment is odd. After all, Barack Obama has appointed two United States Supreme Court justices who have supported gun control. A partial transcript of the September 27 segment, which aired at 5:05pm EDT, follows: 5:01 tease CHRIS MATTHEWS: Mayor Brown, we're going to go through a long list of these crazy accusations against the President here in the beginning of the program tonight because they are unique. It's not just calling him the anti-Christ. There's people who go said he was born in some other country. We're going to get to accusations that just go across the board. What is it about Obama that inspires this kind of weird, zealous hatred? WILLIE BROWN: Well, I think you would have to start with the fact that he is unusual in that he is an African-American. That is an unusual thing for this country. We've been looking forward, as African-Americans, to this for a very long time, but we know that there is a residual amount of racism in this country. It's there. It's going to be there for a long time, and it expresses itself in many, many ways. … 5:01 MATTHEWS: Well, here's something, another strain of the crazy, far right. Here's the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre, and I've known this guy a long time. I'm astounded by this new accusation that the President is leading some conspiracy. Anyway, here he is, Wayne LaPierre, head of the national- not National Public Radio- National Rifle Association, at the conservative conference if Florida last week. Let's listen to Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association. WAYNE LAPIERRE: The President will offer the Second Amendment lip service and hit the campaign trail saying he's actually been good for the Second Amendment. But it's a big, fat, stinking lie. It's all part, it's all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment in our country. Before the President was even sworn into office, they met and they hatched a conspiracy of public deception to try to guarantee his re-election in 2012. MATTHEWS: You know, I got to tell you, again, Ron, this- the language, “lie,” “conspiracy,” it's almost like, I don't know, Lincoln talking about what was going on in the Civil War below the Mason-Dixon line. I mean, this is Civil War talk about a president of the United States.

Continue reading …
Liberal Newsweek Editor Admits: Obama ‘Wasn’t Ready’ to Be President

During an appearance on Morning Joe , Tuesday, Newsweek editor Tina Brown made an off-hand remark about Barack Obama, conceding that the politician “wasn't ready” to be President. Brown has previously attacked Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives for daring to oppose the Obama While discussing whether New Jersey Governor Chris Christie will change his mind and run for President, the former New Yorker editor blurted, ” Actually, I just hope he doesn't, because in the end, you know, his tremendous misgivings, maybe he is right. I mean, We had this with Obama. He wasn't ready, it turns out, really .” [See video below. MP3 audio here .] On December 31, 2009, Brown mocked Rush Limbaugh, who just hours earlier had been taken to the hospital with chest pains, as a “bad fairy” who ruined the magical story of Obama. She portrayed the radio host as “the bad fairy at Sleeping Beauty's christening” and added, “…Rush Limbaugh utters the words, 'I hope you fail.' 'I hope he fails,' he said, and from that moment, the sort of the Pandora's box opened.” Her full quote on Limbaugh: TINA BROWN: It's got to be that incredible inauguration of Obama….You started the year with this huge festival of hope and renewal and everything is going to be so different now, and then, like the bad fairy at Sleeping Beauty's christening, Rush Limbaugh utters the words, 'I hope you fail.''I hope he fails,' he said, and from that moment, the sort of the Pandora’s box opened, and the rest of the year has been just this big discord and toxic atmosphere in politics and partisan divide and people shouting at each other and the Tea Parties and death panels.” -Brown announcing her choice for the most important moment of 2009 on NBC's Today December 31, 2009 a few hours after Limbaugh went to the hospital with chest pains. For more on Tina Brown, see the MRC's Profile in Bias . A transcript of the September 27 exchange follows: 7:27am EDT TINA BROWN: But if he doesn't feel ready to run- Actually, I just hope he doesn't, because in the end, you know, his tremendous misgivings, maybe he is right. I mean, We had this with Obama. He wasn't ready, it turns out, really . MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Got four little kids. BROWN: Maybe Christie isn't ready. Maybe he feels like everybody wants him to but perhaps he does need longer. ANDREA MITCHELL: But, Tina, you could also argue that he might have a better chance at this moment of becoming the president of the United States than being re-elected governor of new Jersey and given all of the problems of running that state.

Continue reading …
As Liberalism’s Approval Drops, Is MSNBC Slipping Into Third Place Behind CNN?

The conventional wisdom on cable news branding may be changing. It’s been said that MSNBC found its way being a fiercely liberal channel, while CNN dithered with a calmer (ahem, still liberal) lineup. Now CNN is close to overtaking MSNBC in prime time, reported Bill Carter in The New York Times . So much for “leaning forward.” “MSNBC may be rediscovering the downside of partisan news,” Chris Daly, a professor of journalism at Boston University, told Carter. “That is, the size of your audience is essentially cajoled by the size of the electorate that already agrees with you.” The electorate isn’t getting thrills up its legs over Obama any more. The Times probably would not want to claim that the entire audience of Fox News Channel is an electoral bloc agreeing with conservatives. Carter reported: The ratings results for the month of September show that CNN, long relegated to third place in the prime-time cable news competition, is edging its way back up, while MSNBC is moving in the other direction. For the month, CNN averaged 257,000 viewers in prime time in the category that counts most to the networks — viewers between the ages of 25 and 54 — because that is where the advertising money goes for news programming. MSNBC was just barely ahead with 269,000 viewers. (Neither approached the leader, Fox News, with 526,000). Both CNN and MSNBC had one especially strong night because of the Republican presidential debates. With those excluded, however, CNN beat MSNBC, 219,000 to 207,000. Carter insists MSNBC is suffering from the removal of that egomaniac Keith Olbermann, and his little show on Current TV. “Mr. Olbermann averaged just over 50,000 viewers in the 25-to-54 measure in September, or less than 20 percent of what he attracted on MSNBC.” (He's certainly not drawing less than one-fifth his old salary.) The removal of the Olbermaniacs is apparently causing heartburn for MSNBC. The change in the September ratings was most noticeable at 8 p.m., where CNN has moved its best-known host, Anderson Cooper. The network’s performance during that hour has improved by 38 percent over last year, growing to 215,000 viewers from 156,000. On MSNBC, meanwhile, Lawrence O’Donnell has lost 100,000 viewers from the numbers Mr. Olbermann posted last September, with 185,000 viewers in the 25-to-54 age group, a drop of 35 percent. (Bill O’Reilly on Fox, as always, dwarfs his competitors with about three times as many viewers, 611,000.) More ominously, the falloff for Mr. O’Donnell seems to be affecting MSNBC’s biggest name, Rachel Maddow. Her audience dropped 15 percent this year, to 245,000 from 289,000. She still beats Piers Morgan on CNN in the 9 p.m. hour, but his show has improved 18 percent over Larry King’s ratings last year, with 193,000 viewers to Mr. King’s 164,000. MSNBC executives endured a contentious parting with Mr. Olbermann last January. Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, had a succinct answer to the question of whether the network is feeling the impact of Mr. Olbermann’s departure: “No.” He added, “I’m confident that we will increase our ratings as politics become the dominant story over the next year.” Carter did not apparently ask Griffin how his political-involvement standard for evening hosts has changed from Olbermann (dumped for a few political contributions) to Sharpton (running a permanent race-baiting campaign). The answer could have been priceless. But CNN is left to boast that its hottest hour in the key demographic is at 10 pm, where it's running a rerun of Anderson Cooper 360: It “remains CNN’s strongest hour, with 274,000 viewers, well ahead of “The Ed Show” on MSNBC with 200,000 (though both also are well behind Greta Van Susteren on Fox, who had 415,000.)” Ed Schultz should keep his day job on the radio.

Continue reading …

Reno Park Memorial

No Comment
Reno Park Memorial

cincyfeeds says: Biker gang killing won’t stop Reno park memorial – CBS News http://t.co/DPAVhpqf CincyFeeds.com

Continue reading …
MSNBC Uses Liberal Green Jobs Activist to Blame Solyndra on George W. Bush

The lengths MSNBC will go to deflect blame from President Obama for anything bad that can be tied to his administration is simply amazing. On Friday, a liberal green jobs activist was brought on “MSNBC Live” to falsely accuse former President George W. Bush of making that ill-advised loan to failed solar company Solyndra (video follows with transcript and commentary): THOMAS ROBERTS, MSNBC: Dr. Mijin Cha is a senior analyst for Demos Sustainable Progress Initiative and a blogger at Policyshop.net. Dr. Cha, it’s nice to see you this morning. And you point out on your blog that the green is under attack, basically. Take a listen, though to what one Republican lawmaker said just last night. CONGRESSMAN MARIO DIAZ-BALART (R-FLORIDA): What the previous gentleman did not say is that Solyndra received $500 million because they have friends in high places. Despite even people in this administration that said, “Don't do it,” they received $500 million. If that was in a different country, we wouldn't call it waste. We would call it corruption. ROBERTS: So how much damage has Solyndra done, Dr. Cha, when it comes to the greens job movement? Is this something that can't be turned around? J. MIJIN CHA, GREEN JOBS ACTIVIST: No. I definitely don't think it can’t be turned around. I think what you find the hearings will show are two things. One is that the administration actually didn't do any wrongdoing, right? This loan was begun under the Bush administration. Solyndra had raised a billion dollars in private capital and then was invited by the Bush administration to apply for this loan program. Yes, but as ABCNews.com reported September 13, the Bush administration unanimously denied that loan: The results of the Congressional probe shared Tuesday with ABC News show that less than two weeks before President Bush left office, on January 9, 2009, the Energy Department's credit committee made a unanimous decision not to offer a loan commitment to Solyndra. You got that, Doctor? The Bush “Energy Department's credit committee made a unanimous decision not to offer a loan commitment to Solyndra.” At roughly the same time Cha was spewing her nonsense on MSNBC, Brian Ross was reporting the truth at ABCNews.com: The Obama administration had selected Solyndra as the first to receive a loan under a program designed to provide government support to companies that would create jobs while generating energy from cleaner sources, such as solar, wind and nuclear. President Obama personally visited the Solyndra complex, hailing it as a leader in this emerging field. For MSNBC to allow anyone on its network to say anything contrary to the truth without being challenged is a affront to journalism. As NewsBusters reports on a daily basis, this is par for the course at this so-called “news network.”

Continue reading …
Crazy Larry: Perry Is GOP’s ‘Favorite Killer, Favorite State-Sanctioned Killer’

It's going to be a long campaign . . . Republicans haven't come close to choosing their presidential candidate yet, but already a proud member of the MSM is calling a leading GOP contender a “killer.” On his MSNBC show this evening, Crazy Larry O'Donnell accused Rick Perry of being–for his record of enforcing the law on capital punishment in Texas–the Republicans' “favorite killer, favorite state-sanctioned killer.”

Continue reading …