Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 765)
GOP threatens to hold START hostage over ‘don’t ask’ repeal

Click here to view this media As the repeal of the military’s gay ban edges closer, Republicans are finding more ways to derail the effort. Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) announced on the Senate floor Friday that many of his Republican colleagues may vote against the new START nuclear treaty with Russia if Democrats move forward with a plan to vote on “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal Saturday. “I want to say to our presiding officer that what’s happened over the course of the last 12 hours is by filing cloture last night on ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ and on the DREAM Act during a lame duck session in the middle of a START treaty, what it says is that Republicans — and I don’t even like to use partisan labels here — but Republicans, ‘y’all need to rise up above partisanship and deal with foreign policy in a bipartisan way, but in the midst of that, we’re going to throw some partisan issues in here that our campaign promises we made over the course of this last year as we ran for election.’” Corker said. “I have to tell you what this has done. I’ve been in three meetings this morning. What’s happening is it poisons the well on this debate on something that’s very, very important. I don’t want to see that happen. I’m not someone who comes down here and says fiery things to terrorize and divide. But I’m hoping that saner minds will prevail,” he said. “These issues that have been brought forth are absolutely partisan political issues, brought forth to basically accommodate activist groups around this country,” he continued. “I’m hoping that those will be taken down or I don’t think the future of the START treaty over the next several days is going to be successful… I’m hoping that’s going to change.” The Washington Post ‘s Greg Sargent noted that he has heard rumors for days that Republicans would use “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal as an excuse not to pass START. “This isn’t really a threat on Corker’s part,” Sargent wrote. “Rather, he’s saying — in a more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger way — that his GOP colleagues will be less likely to support START unless Reid drops his plan for DADT and DREAM votes right away.”

Continue reading …
December 17, 1941 – Getting Used To World War 2

enlarge Credit: Herald Examiner Collection Even Los Angeles was getting the hang of blackouts in 1941. Click here to view this media On December 17th 1941 it was 10 days after Pearl Harbor and the country was gearing up for what would become the long haul. Fighting was going on all over the Pacific region and news reports on this day try to keep track of what was happening with varying degrees of results. Heads were rolling in Washington over who was “asleep at the switch” in Pearl Harbor and the Pacific Command was revamped and replaced quickly with heads lined up on the chopping block before any investigation got underway. Despite everything the universal feeling was to keep Christmas going and even the Mayor of San Francisco declared all celebrations would go on as planned. Not even a war was going to stop people from jamming local department stores, even if they were blacked out. A day with more questions than answers and a December 17th more confusing than most.

Continue reading …
Fox legal analyst doesn’t mention Republicans voted against 9/11 health bill

Click here to view this media Jon Stewart has shown some of this clip twice now this week as Exhibit A of how the media has dropped the ball on how the U.S. Senate has turned their back on 9/11 First Responders. In this case, a Fox News legal analyst actually rails against this, but fails to mention who the culprits really were or why. Via Raw Story : Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson, Jr. is mad. He’s mad that Congress did not pass health benefits for 9/11 first responders. But he’s not mad enough to explain why. The bill was opposed almost exclusively by Republicans, who demanded Democrats first pass tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. In a three minute monologue broadcast Monday during Fox & Friends, Johnson said simply that “Congress” was to blame. “Shame, embarrassment, outrage, anger, all are proper reactions to the conduct of our Senators, who will now find one excuse after another to explain away the fact that they have turned their back on American heroes,” he said. “Heroes whose only sin was to expect nothing for their service and were then promised the world by politicians who couldn’t take enough pictures with them.” Forty-one of the 42 Republican Senators voted against the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 , with one Republican, Sen. Sam Brownback of Kentucky, abstaining. Only one Democratic Senator, Harry Reid of Nevada, voted against the bill. “In this fight, America fought America, and we all lost,” Johnson added.

Continue reading …
The Utterly Predictable Sarah Palin

Click here to view this media Robin Roberts asks Palin about the controversy surrounding her hunting on her reality show, the criticism from Aaron Sorkin , PETA and others. Sarah responded as expected. Palin on GMA , “[I] would never shoot an animal for its fur or for fashion”. In the background, a bearskin rug complete with head. enlarge So it goes.

Continue reading …
Newt Gingrich Touts Incoming House Leadership as Job Creators

Click here to view this media When asked by Sean Hannity how Republicans are going to counter attacks by Democrats that their leadership doesn’t care that they are supporting policies that characterize “Republicans as wanting to kick granny out on the street and have grandma and grandpa eat dog food”, Newt Gingrich offered this defense of their incoming committee chairs. HANNITY: Let’s look ahead to the next Congress. When they start to take power in the House on Jan. 5th and we have more Republican Senators, first order of business I think is going to be to repeal health care, cut spending. You lived through this. How long is it going to be before Democrats start characterizing Republicans as wanting to kick granny out on the street and have grandma and grandpa eat dog food. GINGRICH: Well I’m sure some left wingers will start doing it on Christmas day. But I think the key is for Speaker Boehner and the Republican team in the House to calmly and methodically focus on job creation, then to focus on a series of hearings on Obama-care and then repeal it and begin to replace it with a much better plan, and then to cut spending and to control spending. My understanding is, Congressman Paul Ryan, the new Chairman of The Budget Committee is ready to move on the spending side. I think Dave Camp is very prepared to move on the jobs side on Ways and Means and I think that Fred Upton is very prepared to move on Obama-care, so I think you’re going to see a Republican team in the House from day one prepared to move towards a healthier, more prosperous, more employed America. And I think that’s good news for the country. I’m just curious how Paul Ryan, who wants to privatize Social Security among a ton of other terrible ideas with his Roadmap for America’s Future , Dave Camp who supports outsourcing of American jobs and Fred Upton who wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act — which despite all its faults is better than what any Republicans are offering as an alternative are in any way shape or form — concerned about job creation in the United States or keeping our social safety nets intact so that we don’t literally throw grandma and grandpa out on the streets and tell them to go eat dog food. Republicans don’t care about job creation and their policies don’t create jobs. The only thing they care about are their rich campaign donors, and Newt is just doing a preemptive strike here with what’s sure to be the backlash as that becomes more painfully obvious when they have to take some responsibility for governing with their control of the House. They decided to ignore Darrell Issa and the endless hearings we’re going to get out of his Oversight Committee and whether we’re going to get to look forward to another set of impeachment hearings over bulls**t as we had when Bill Clinton was in office during which Newt Gingrich was blasting him for the same sexual improprieties he was participating in himself. Hannity finished up the segment with trying to get Gingrich to say if he was running for president in 2012 by asking him where we’d see him campaigning. I think other than Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich is about the worst person the GOP could possibly nominate as their candidate, so hey… go for it, Newt.

Continue reading …

Jon Stewart plays it straight last night to lay out the absolute hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of this situation, both by the politicians and those in the media who fail to do their job and call them out on this. 9/11 first responders watch as Mitch McConnell cries over a friend’s retirement, and Jon Kyl explains why the Senate can’t work the week after Christmas. Partial transcript from an earlier segment: Before we go, I want to talk one last time about something called the Zadroga bill, who was an NYPD detective who died in 2006 from respiratory illness thought to be caused by the dust he inhaled while working at Ground Zero after 2001. This bill would provide $7 billion in medical and financial benefits for Ground Zero workers who get sick, and they’re going to pay for it by closing a corporate tax loophole. It’s a win-win-win-win, just fucking do it!! The House passed it. The House of Representatives passed it, and it would pass in the Senate, if it came to an up-or-down vote. They have more than the 50 votes they need. But the Senate Republicans have filibustered it, won’t allow the bill to come up for a vote. Luckily, yesterday there was some good news from the Senate, the logjam broke. DIANE SAWYER (12/15/2010): Today the Senate passed that bill to extend tax cuts to all Americans, including the wealthiest, by an overwhelming 81-19 vote. Meanwhile, one Republican Senator saw fit to call the cops on some 9/11 First Responders yesterday when they visited her office. Congratulations, Susan Collins of Maine.

Continue reading …
‘Terror Babies’ Louie Gohmert Predicts Doom for America and the Military From Repeal of DADT

Click here to view this media It appears fear mongering flame thrower Rep. Louie Gohmert has found himself a new target other than those “terror babies” he warned us about . This week it’s “teh gays” that are going to literally destroy our military if they’re allowed to come out with the possible repeal of DADT, or worse yet, allowing gay members of the military to serve openly might just mean the end of America’s “existence as a great nation.” Right Wing Watch has more — Gohmert: Without DADT, Military Stands to Lose Thousands and US Will Reach the “End of its Existence as a Great Nation” : While debating the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), of “terror-baby” fame, claimed that the policy’s repeal may doom the military and the nation as a whole. Gohmert blasted the recent Pentagon study , which showed that an overwhelming number of military service members do not oppose repealing DADT, and said that the military could potentially lose “many thousands, or tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands” if the policy is repealed. Gohmert uses no scientific evidence of his own to back up his claim that “hundreds of thousands” of troops could leave, even though the Pentagon’s own polling found that the vast majority of troops do not have problems serving alongside gays and lesbians, and 92 percent of those who believe they have already served alongside gays did not believe that their “units functioned poorly as a result.” Gohmert went on to suggest that the House, which today voted to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell 250-175, is opening up the floodgates to a disorganized and ineffective military. According to the Congressman, “when militaries throughout history of the greatest nations in the world have adopted the policy that it’s fine for homosexuality to be overt…they’re toward the end of its existence as a great nation.” Here’s the transcript of Gohmert’s remarks from Right Wing Watch and as they noted, he’s just channeling the remarks of The Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins who just earned a spot on the SPLC’s list of hate groups for their anti-gay rhetoric. You want an accurate poll? Take one where military members can answer privately with no ability of the commanders to figure out who answered where. And then let’s find out how many thousands, or tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands we can lose with this activity. That’s important. Now we were told Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is inconsistent with American values, I would submit the military is inconsistent with American values. It does not have freedom of speech, it does not have freedom of assembly, it does not have the freedom to express its love to those in the military the way you can out here because it’s an impediment to the military mission. You can’t do that. Can you imagine military members being able to tell their commander what they think of him using freedom of speech or assembling where they wish? It doesn’t work. This is one of those issues that is so personal to the military; we need to have an accurate poll. And to my friend who said history would judge us poorly, I would submit if you look thoroughly at history, and I’m not saying its cause and effect, but when militaries throughout history of the greatest nations in the world have adopted the policy that it’s fine for homosexuality to be overt, you can keep it private it’s fine if you can’t that’s fine too, they’re toward the end of its existence as a great nation.

Continue reading …
Tim Pawlenty Attacks Public Sector Unions – Calls Their Benefits and Pensions a Ponzi Scheme

Click here to view this media Greta Van Susteren asks Tim Pawlenty about this nasty little screed he wrote recently attacking public sector unions and their benefits. Here’s the opening. Tim Pawlenty: Public-sector unions burden the taxpayer : When Americans think of organized labor, they might think of images like I saw growing up in a blue-collar meatpacking town: hard hats, work boots, tough conditions and gritty jobs. While I didn’t work in the slaughterhouses, I did become a union member when I worked at a grocery store to help put myself through school. I was grateful for the paycheck and proud of the work I did. The rise of the labor movement in the early 20th century was a triumph for America’s working class. In an era of deep economic anxiety, unions stood up for hardworking but vulnerable families, protecting them from physical and economic exploitation. Much has changed. The majority of union members today no longer work in construction, manufacturing or “strong back” jobs. They work for government, which, thanks to President Obama, has become the only booming “industry” left in our economy. Since January 2008 the private sector has lost nearly 8 million jobs, while local, state and federal governments have added 590,000. Pawlenty apparently thinks if you don’t wear a hard hat or steel toed boots as part of your job, you don’t deserve the protection of a union. I guess he also thinks that no one who’s drawing a check from the government does physical labor. Transcript and a response from the Minnesota Nurses Association below the fold. VAN SUSTEREN: All right, you have an op-ed piece in which you talk about government employees. And you say that according to your op-ed piece, government employees have an average income of $123,000, which is twice the average pay, according to you, of the private sector. And you go after the unions. You used to be a union guy. What happened? PAWLENTY: Well, I grew up in a meat-packing town, Greta, and for seven or so years of my life, I was in a union. I come from a lunchbucket union family. My dad was a truck driver. My mom died when I was 16. These unions played a role when the workers were being exploited in places like coal mines and meat-packing plants and other dangerous circumstances. But now you have the biggest growth in unions in government employees, government unions, the public employee unions. They are some of the most protected, secure employees in the country. And they have pay and benefits that are better, in most instances, than the taxpayers who are actually paying the bill. It’s unsustainable. It’s unfair. This — I call it a silent coup in some ways. But obviously, this has to be taken head on. We’ve done this in Minnesota and made some good steps. We’re getting sued over it, by the way, in a case that’s probably going to go to the U.S. Supreme Court. But if we don’t get this fixed, it is going to go a long ways towards taken down California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and places like that, and many other states won’t be far behind. But we’ve got to make sure that we get people more aware of, really, the scandal that is the public employment pension and benefit Ponzi scheme. MN Nurses Respond to Tim Pawlenty’s Attack on Unions, RNs : Soon-to-be-former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty recently penned a blistering attack on state employee unions, including state-employed nurses. Below is MNA President Linda Hamilton’s official response, which has been sent to the Star Tribune and The Wall Street Journal, which originally published Pawlenty’s Op-Ed on December 13th. Here is the response: Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s recent opinion piece (“Public Sector Unions a Burden”) was filled with the political rhetoric that our soon-to-be-former Governor has been using to start his 2012 Presidential bid instead of serving the people of Minnesota. According to Mr. Pawlenty, government employees who care for our sick, plow our streets and teach our children should feel ashamed and embarrassed to be part of a union. Apparently, it is our state-employed nurses, snowplow drivers, janitors and teachers that are responsible for Minnesota’s nearly $6 billion budget deficit – not Tim Pawlenty’s failed leadership. Perhaps the most absurd part of Mr. Pawlenty’s feeble attack on the working class is his contention that we should strive to rely on “predictable” retirement benefits such as 401(k) plans. Maybe our Governor missed the recent financial collapse where these “predictable” 401(k) plans of countless Americans evaporated into thin air? Maybe he thinks unemployed workers are able to save for their retirement? Speaking as a nurse who spends her time working here in Minnesota rather than campaigning for higher office all across the country on the state’s dime, I can say without reservation that Tim Pawlenty’s true legacy is one of trying to pin our state’s budget woes on the backs of the working class while doing everything in his power to protect and reward those private sector, multimillionaire CEOs who continue to bankroll his political platform. Sincerely, Linda Hamilton, President Minnesota Nurses Association

Continue reading …
Gawker.com Says User Database Compromised

Gawker Media Inc., which runs a series of irreverent blogs on media, technology and other issues, is urging subscribers to change their passwords because someone has managed to hack into the company’s user database. (Dec. 15)

Continue reading …
How to Build With Roundwood Timber Framing (Video)

Image credit: Permaculture Media While regenerative coppice forestry may be struggling to take off in the US , in the UK Ben Law’s stunning woodland house has shown many people around the world that there are a myriad of ways to work with our woodlands to create building materials, fuel and food from what surrounds us. Roundwood timber framing is one such technique tha… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …