Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 716)
Monica Crowley calls the President "Obama-Mubarek" because of his repudiation of DOMA

Click here to view this media Monica Crowley has been acting like a screaming harpie since Obama has been in office and she’s moving into Beck World the closer we get to the general election. Here’s her latest rant to Megyn Kelly. Raw Story: Fox News employee Monica Crowley was so bent out of shape by President Barack Obama’s decision to no longer defend parts of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that she suggested he was a dictator. “To me, it’s a form of dictatorship,” she said “That’s Mubarak Obama. You cannot just pick and choose which law you will enforce when you are president of the United States or the Attorney General.” You got that? President Obama is an evil dictator now because he realizes that DOMA is an indefensible violation of the constitutional rights of the LGBT community. Does anyone at Fox even know what a dictator actually is? Generally speaking, they’re not in the business of protecting or extending people’s rights.

Continue reading …
The truth about Twitter, Facebook and the uprisings in the Arab world

Recent events in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt have been called ‘Twitter revolutions’ – but can social networking overthrow a

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck’s Amazing Circular Dog Whistle

Click here to view this media Every day, Glenn Beck gets a little more shrill and a little more weird. Yesterday, his show was interrupted for President Obama’s statement on Libya, which gave him even more grist for his mill. But don’t write him off as a lunatic. He is one of the most calculating and dangerous blowhards ever to grace our airwaves. This clip comes shortly after President Obama’s statement on Libya. No matter whether one is conservative or liberal, Libya is a complicated situation with many ramifications. It’s true that we want to be on the side of the true proponents of a democracy there, and everyone agrees that Qaddafi is an evil despot who is not going to go without leaving death, destruction and havoc in his wake. But if you’re Glenn Beck, you somehow twist this up in order to make President Obama look like a subversive rebel with a deep love of revolution. He rants about how the administration has not made public statements about Iran or Libya and those brave young fighters for democracy. He holds those freedom fighters up as heroes and martyrs, then turns right around and damns protesters in Wisconsin as agitators out to wreck the country. The only way to go there is if you understand Beck’s perspective as a raging American exceptionalist who applauds freedom fighters in other countries while believing this country is perfectly fine with the oligarchs in charge. Here’s a transcript of his little rant: He might be busy, his wife just hired a personal shopper. [evidently referring to Michelle Obama...] What are these people thinking? Back to the rebellious kids, I guess. What’s happening in Wisconsin. It’s just those kids and workers, just like you. Obama was worried about the assault on the unions immediately, but not about the hippie dope radicals who are having Woodstock in the capitol, whose MO is to bring down the US AND the free market. There are reports now of vandalism in the Wisconsin capitol and it is spreading. Is there nothing sacred? Who are we? The world has to know what America stands for and who we are and that they can count on American principles and values. We don’t know them ourselves. We’ve destroyed our relationships with Great Britain and Egypt. We did that a long time ago. Now we learn that the last telephone call President Obama had with the Saudi Arabians ended in a huge disagreement. You can attack a warship and not worry about it because we’re not going to do anything. Iran can send warships for the first time through the Suez Canal and the President says zero. Who are our friends? Who are our enemies? By the way we walk, I can’t tell. We have a president who apparently loves instability and revolution. And that is the antithesis of those two words: Social Security. Yes, Beck actually managed to tie the term (but not with the same meaning) Social Security to instability in the Middle East. He ranted like this for the entire show. But here’s why he matters. He plays to the timid older people who are frightened by any change, much less the kinds of sea change we’re seeing in the world right now. When he talks about revolution spreading from Egypt to Europe to this country and conflates the protests in Wisconsin with the revolution in Libya, he’s appealing to the people who are terrified that a nuclear holocaust is right around the corner. He thrives on this stuff, and so do they. It’s part and parcel of the larger strategy to erode confidence and emphasize chaos in order to impose authoritarian-style politics in this country. Beck is an expert at it, and as weird and whacko as he may seem to anyone who bothers to read a newspaper, he’s also singing to the hearts of the silent fearful ones.

Continue reading …
Scott Walker Claims He’s Never Met the Koch Brothers and Doesn’t Know Who Breitbart Is

Click here to view this media Well, MSNBC and CNN may have cut away from Scott Walker taking questions after he got punked by the fake Koch brother , but Fox’s Greta Van Susteren actually asked Walker about the incident on her show this Wednesday. Walker claimed he’d never spoken to the Koch brothers before and he was just taking a phone call from one of the countless people who call him every day when he allowed the… you know… fake Koch brother to take up twenty minutes of his time. It’s pretty amazing that someone he’s never talked to before managed to get twenty minutes with him when Democratic legislators and union leaders have said he’s not taking their calls. But of course Greta didn’t ask him about that. Walker also claimed he had no idea who Andrew Breitbart was when Van Susteren quoted him responding to the fake Koch brother saying he was going to bring him in to cause trouble at the protests. WALKER: Look, yeah. I don’t even know who that is. VAN SUSTEREN: You don’t know who that is? WALKER: No. I’ve never met the Koch brothers before so this is obviously why someone calling could prank me because I’ve never talked to him before. I know he’s an employer in the state and in the end, I mean, I think it’s interesting because the prankster there tried to insinuate at least that this person was going to push for people to come in and cause a disturbance amongst the protesters. I made it very clear, that’s not right. That doesn’t work. That has no value. VAN SUSTEREN: But you thought about it. When you brought up the part about doing dirty tricks with the crowd, you said well, at least you’re quoted as saying, you know well the only problem with that, because we thought about that, the problem that, my only gut reaction that is right now the lawmakers I’ve talked to have completely had it with them. The public isn’t really fond of this. WALKER: Right because in the end the protesters have not overwhelmed them. They’ve realized they’ve come in from other states. VAN SUSTEREN: But you thought about it. WALKER: Well yeah, we had people contact us, I had people, I even had lawmakers in other states suggesting riling things up. When I pointed out, increasingly and I’ve said this all over the media, I’ve said it in all my interviews, is that we’ve had a civil discourse amongst people here in the state of Wisconsin. My great fear was of people coming from other states. My biggest fear was last Saturday when you had protesters both for and against the bill coming in. I thought you were going to have some major collisions between the two and thank god, we didn’t have any disturbances. I think it’s because the people of the state are the ones thriving. Yeah, thank god that thing I was thinking about doing but chose not to for purely political reasons didn’t end up in any of my constituents being exposed to some violence at these otherwise peaceful protests. What a schmuck. And just who are these lawmakers from other states? You want to fill us in on that Scott? Shorter Scott Walker: Koch brothers, what Koch brothers? Oh those guys. Barely met ‘em. Breitbart, who’s that? Trip, what trip? Did I say I wanted to go on a trip? I’m just looking out for the voters of Wisconsin. Good grief what a horrible liar. Walker obviously thinks the voters of Wisconsin are idiots incapable of listening to a recording or reading a transcript . When John Nichols was talking to Ed Schultz about Walker’s potential ethical and legal problems after this prank, he said there hasn’t been anything that the voters of Wisconsin have been paying as much attention to since Brett Favre quit the Packers. I hope as many of them as possible get a chance to watch this little lie-fest with Greta since they’re obviously paying attention to what’s going on.

Continue reading …
MSNBC Makes It Sound Like Wisconsin Democrats Caved And Made A Deal…But Did They?

Click here to view this media Watch the breaking news banner in this video as MSNBC breaks the “news” that “GOP & Dems in WI Agree to Deal Ending Debate on Labor Battle.” The initial report was breathlessly shared by Norah O’Donnell this way: SCARBOROUGH: I understand the Associated Press is uh — has breaking news that there may be a deal in Wisconsin. Whaddya got? ODONNELL: That’s right. We’re learning now from the Associated Press — this passed the urgent wires — that Democrats and Republicans in Wisconsin have agreed to a deal that will limit further debate on this bill taking away the collective bargaining rights. So, this deal was just announced this morning after 6AM. They are going to have a vote on this measure today, later today this Thursday, so they’ve agreed on that. The Democrats have agreed to limit further amendments, this is after some 40 hours on this and so there is going to be a vote later today, this Thursday, Joe. That’s just passing the wires. SCARBOROUGH: Any information– Any more specific information, I mean, are the — from the initial report, it sounds like the Democrats are just going to come back and vote on an up or down. Is that what it sounds like? ODONNELL: Well, what they’ve agreed to is to limit further amendments to just 38 with a 10-minute time limit on each one. And if they take the maximum time that’s going to put the vote around noon so I think we’re going to have a debate today, essentially it’s going to be debated on, we’re going to watch that debate and there’s going to be a vote on it. See how O’Donnell never really mentions that it’s the Wisconsin ASSEMBLY that’s voting on it? The Assembly Democrats have been working to filibuster in that chamber as hard as they can. They’ve thrown 100 amendments at it and have done everything they can to stop it from going forward. They’re tired. And so they’ve agreed to close their filibuster down . That’s the ONLY thing that’s been agreed to. But O’Donnell never makes that distinction and indeed, it’s only made about 30 minutes later in the broadcast, despite the banner clearly stating it’s the Assembly that’s voting, not the Senate. In my opinion, this kind of “error” is intended to demoralize those fighting passage of this bill, the same way the Fox News “error” yesterday flipping poll results was meant to do. So let’s clarify exactly what that “breaking news” was and what Senate Democrats are and are not doing. LA Times: Even as demonstrators continued to chant and sing their protests against Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to end collective bargaining for state workers, lawmakers prepared to move the bill along. Though the measure is expected to easily pass the Republican-controlled Assembly, it also needs Senate approval. In television interviews from Illinois, Democratic Sen. Jon Erpenbach said all 14 senators who have fled Wisconsin would not return until some form of compromise is negotiated with Walker. The Republican governor has repeatedly ruled out any talks. Just a reminder about how biased that “liberal media” can be.

Continue reading …
Clueless Malkin: Richard Trumka and Andy Stern are "Kings of Astroturf"

Click here to view this media Nothing really gets my blood boiling like seeing people sit in unrighteous judgment of others decrying a lack of civility while being demeaning and nasty themselves. This three minute segment has more insults and insinuations about unions, President Obama, and Democrats than anything they’re whining about. I realize this is the third post in as many days about Fox News crying about meanies on the left, but really, this stuff has to be called out for what it is — an effort to deflect and inflame. It’s part of a larger strategy to surround people with misinformation and turn the tables on their opponents (anyone who isn’t a flaming conservative). Malkin is a real expert at it. Beginning with the unions, she refers to Andy Stern and Richard Trumka as thugs and bullies, then says this: And of course the White House has been trying to disavow these — what’s happening, and try and make it as though it’s some sort of grassroots thing. These are the kings of astroturf , and they’ve been coordinating since day one and of course, well before that to help get Barack Obama elected, and before Richard Trumka, of course, it was Andy Stern, another thuggish Big Labor head. And they can no — they can no — Barack Obama can no more disassociate himself from this kind of trash than he can disassociate himself from his own shadow. Compare and contrast that little mini-rant with her outrage over the Tea Party protests in 2009, where Malkin swore up and down that the Tea Party movement was just a grassroots effort to save those rich folks from the tax burdens imposed on them by mean liberals. Matt Taibbi’s glorious rant on Malkin in 2009 is worth revisiting for this description: And that’s fine, good for her. But that doesn’t make her readable. However, this move of hers to spearhead the teabag movement really adds an element to her writing that wasn’t there before. Now when I read her stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of balls in her mouth. It vastly improves her prose. Now think about that when considering this little slam later in the clip, where Hannity brings up signs seen at the Wisconsin protests that say things like “Death to Tyrants” or “Walker the Mubarak of the Midwest.” Granted, these are not very nice things to say, but then…Governor Walker is not being a very nice person. Telling workers to take their union contracts and shove ‘em is hardly my idea of having an adult conversation. But listen to Malkin indulge herself in some projection while accusing Democrats and union members of the same thing. Hannity says the media is “virtually silent on this (the signs) and asks for Malkin’s reaction: Yes, well, it’s a tactic they always use. It was born of an entire Alinsky strategy, of demonizing and marginalizing the left’s opponents. It’s what they always do. And what they’ve always engaged in is this massive, chronic psychological projection, accusing their opponents of what they fundamentally do to fight for their power grabs and for their power agenda. That’s really what it’s all about. And it’s interesting to hear some of these Big Labor thugs defend what they’re doing in Wisconsin, demonizing Governor Walker, trying to prank him, trying to embarrass him, trying to distract him from being an adult and that’s what the voters of Wisconsin wanted — adults. And this big temper tantrum just shows you that there are no adults in Washington, there are no adults in the Democrat party. These people are still in their Huggies PullUps crying all the way. Er, yes. Pullups. Democrat party. Alinsky strategy. Yes, that’s really adult, don’t you think? I have three words for Michelle Malkin with regard to her whining about projection, punking and adult behavior. ACORN . Sherrod . Breitbarted . That is all.

Continue reading …
Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) Exposes GOP Hypocrisy: Regulate Bitches and ‘Mos, Deregulate Everything Else

My vagina really hates you—like, way down in its special place.1 The debate about H.R. 3 is still raging. After getting creamed in the media for their “forcible rape” shenanigans, House Republicans backtracked. They agreed to drop the “forcible rape” language and replace it with existing Hyde Amendment language. (Thanks, y’all! You’re aces!) The bill Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Balloon Juice Discovery Date : 24/02/2011 18:36 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
Egypt has returned from the cultural backwaters | Nesrine Malik

Once the dominant force in Arab culture, post-revolutionary Egypt now has the chance to return to this role I grew up in the post-Sadat Arab world. The 80s was a time when Egyptian drama, music and film monopolised Arabic media; we imbibed the Egyptian accent and colloquialisms as well as our local influences. The evening soap opera in most Arab countries was Egyptian, and I spent many an evening captivated by dramas set in Alexandria, Cairo and El Saeed. Cairo was the main holiday destination for other Arabs and many bought properties in the city. To some northern Sudanese, Cairo was a second home, almost as familiar as Khartoum. When I was a child, my mother would regale me with stories of growing up in the 60s and 70s; accounts of her and her siblings gathering around a crackling radio set to listen to Gamal Abdel Nasser’s speeches, of how when Abdel Halim Hafez, a renowned Egyptian classical singer, died, the shock reverberated in cities throughout the region. Post-independence Arab history always seems to involve Egypt in some crucial way. Egypt was the state that represented the Arabs in the international arena. Its politicians, entertainers, actors, musicians and writers featured prominently in Arabic popular culture. It had both rich heritage and an avant garde movement. Most people knew far more about Egypt and its culture than they had any business knowing. Gulf or Levantine influences were almost entirely absent from the Arab consciousness. The image of the Egypt I grew up with was not the one that met me when I eventually went to university in Cairo. Over the previous 20 years, the country’s stature had diminished both culturally and economically. The arrival of Arabsat and region-wide satellite channels in the 90s amplified Gulf culture, and with the end of the civil war in Lebanon, Levantine media seemed to take over the airwaves almost overnight. The stories that came out of Egypt became increasingly Dickensian and distressing: crushing poverty, sexual harassment, police brutality, corruption, religious tension, and a joke of a president. A far cry from the country that, having established itself politically ahead of the rest of the Arab states, reigned imperious. Politically, the fall was dramatic : “absent in Iraq, no genuine impact on the Arab-Israeli peace process and seen as complicit in sieges in Gaza”. But even with the petro-dollars pumped into media and construction in the Gulf, no nation ever managed to fill the void that Egypt left. Even the economically mighty Saudi Arabia, considered by the west to be the religious and historical centre of gravity of the region, never succeeded in forming a core or Arab culture. This is why, even though Tunisians have inspired the near miraculous events of the past few weeks in Libya, Bahrain and elsewhere, it is really Egypt that has inspired the Arab psyche. In a region where there is significant tension between nationalities, people flocked to the streets to welcome Egypt’s return to its rightful position. It was fascinating to note that in the immediate aftermath of Mubarak’s resignation, commentators and opinion formers on television channels echoed this sentiment. It wasn’t about the removal of a decrepit dictator, it was about the rebirth of Egypt. Dignity was the theme of the revolution. The songs, the chants, the placards, displayed a unique artfulness, spirit and a sense of humour. One Egyptian commentator, minutes after Mubarak resigned, said that now Egypt could return to penning the literature, music and drama that had produced Omar Sharif, Youssef Chahine and Naguib Mahfouz — it was the end of the era of “fallen art and kitsch popular culture”. The chant that resonated around the Arab world was ” ahom, ahom, el masriyeen ahom “, meaning “here, the Egyptians are here”. It heralded not the arrival, but the return of Egypt. Of course no one knows exactly what the future holds, and there will be an at times painful process of adjustment. But there is indeed a sense that the Egyptians are here, Egypt is back. And the Arab world, desperate for a leader in the absence of effective, representative heads of state, welcomes its return. Egypt Arab and Middle East protests Middle East Nesrine Malik guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former Wisconsin AG to Recommend Walker be Investigated for Ethics Violations to Accountability Board

Click here to view this media Looks like Scott Walker’s prank phone call may end up getting him in some trouble with their Government Accountability Board and his remarks about bringing in agent provocateurs to cause trouble at the rallies isn’t sitting too well with the voters. Ed Schultz discussed Governor Walker’s conversation with the fake Koch brother with The Nation’s John Nichols who filled Ed in on some of the latest developments in Wisconsin. NICHOLS: The governor’s not walking a fine line Ed. He tripped off the cliff. The fact of the matter is that Wisconsin has the toughest ethics laws in the nation. We pride ourselves on that. That goes back more than a hundred years to the progressive era with Bob La Follette. Those ethics laws require that an elected official keep faith with the people of Wisconsin. Those statements raise deep concerns here in Madison and around the state. The former Attorney General of Wisconsin, Peg Lautenschlager told me tonight that she is in the reviewing this, of the transcript of this conversation, for several hours found what she determined to be multiple ethics, election law and labor law violations. And she will tomorrow morning suggest that the state Government Accountability Board begin to review those ethics violations. Ed Schultz asked Nichols if the Republicans running the state would allow the investigation to go forward. NICHOLS: The Government Accountability Board is an independent, non-partisan board, staffed by former judges who are elected in a non-partisan manner without any Republican or Democratic control. Nichols wasn’t sure where the investigation would end up going and pointed out to Schultz that the residents of Wisconsin aren’t too happy with some of the other statements he made during the call as well. NICHOLS: But second, there’s a moral component to this. People around Wisconsin are talking tonight about the fact that they brought their children to peaceful, very attractive and popular rallies in Madison and other communities and now they find out that their governor says that he considered sending agent provocateurs into those rallies to screw things up and cause trouble, perhaps to begin violence and he only decided not to do it, not because he’s worried for the people of his state, but because he was worried that it might not play well politically. That’s a very troubling thing to have a governor of an American state talking about. It looks like the tactics being used by these Koch brother teabaggers are finally coming back to bit them.

Continue reading …
Zimbabwe charges 46 with treason for watching videos of Egypt protests

Activists, trade unionists and students could face death penalty after police raid meeting on Middle East uprisings Forty-six people in Zimbabwe have been charged with treason, and some allegedly beaten by police, after watching videos of the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia The activists, trade unionists and students were at a meeting on Saturday titled Revolt in Egypt and Tunisia: What lessons can be learnt by Zimbabwe and Africa?, when it was raided by police who seized a video projector, two DVDs and a laptop. The group was detained in police cells and transferred to a notorious maximum security prison on Wednesday night. Treason can be punishable by death in Zimbabwe. Prosecutors allege that Munyaradzi Gwisai, a labour activist and former MP, and the other participants were conducting the meeting to “organise, strategise and implement the removal of the constitutional government of Zimbabwe … the Egyptian way”. In court documents, prosecutors said those present watched video footage of the Egyptian revolt that brought down Hosni Mubarak after nearly three decades in power. They alleged that the Zimbabwean participants took turns making speeches calling for a revolt against president Robert Mugabe’s 31-year authoritarian rule . But Gwisai’s wife, Shantha Bloemen, currently in New York, said: “The fact they had a meeting is a regular event. They often have seminars on workers’ rights. They watch documentaries about social issues and the fact they were watching the topical issues of the day is unsurprising. “No one would deny they want a better Zimbabwe but it’s a big leap from there to say they’re planning to make a serious threat against anyone. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Bloemen alleged incidents of police brutality. “Some of the ringleaders were definitely bruised and beaten during interrogation in the first two days. They’re being portrayed as radical lefties but they’re just regular people who want change in Zimbabwe.” She added: “I spoke to Munya yesterday on his way to the courtroom. He was guarded on the phone and telling jokes. At that point they thought the case would be heard quickly and there was generally a lot of solidarity in the group. “No one thought it would be a charge of treason. It’s clearly being driven by a political agenda. I think the strategy of the regime at the moment is to stall it for as long as possible for propaganda value, to instill fear in people.” The activists, including 11 women, appeared in dirty, soiled clothing in court on Wednesday. Gwisai wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the legend “World at a crossroads”. Human Rights Watch condemned the “politically motivated charges”. Daniel Bekele, its Africa director, said: “The Zimbabwe authorities should immediately free the activists and drop these outrageous charges. Arresting people for watching a video on the historic events in the Middle East is a transparent pretext to block peaceful criticism of the government.” Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe Egypt Middle East Tunisia Protest David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …