GDP And The Republican Assault On The Middle Class 01 Stand With Wisconsin Rally 2/26/11 Police Allow Wisconsin Protesters To Stay In Capitol! The Immoral Minority: Rachel Maddow to Wisconsin protesters : “You … Rachel Maddow to Wisconsin protesters : “You are winning this fight!” Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy. Kind of long, but definitely worth the time to view it. Posted by Gryphen at 2:00 AM … Salisbury News: Media Make Wisconsin Protesters Look Like Sai Media Make Wisconsin Protesters Look Like Sai. The cadre of reporters that descended on Madison, Wis., during the past couple weeks steered attention away from the union demonstrators’ negativity — or, at the very least, failed to call … Wisconsin Protests: 3rd World or 3rd Grade? « Cornell Insider The Wisconsin protesters are fighting to keep ours from functioning. There should be outrage. There should be coverage and condemnation of these actions and of this behavior on every news channel. But there is not. Why? … NH INSIDER- Your Source for NH Politics – Press Releases – CEI … Senior Counsel Hans Bader says that Wisconsin protesters are misleading the media about Virginia test scores. “In 2009, Virginia ranked in the middle of states on the ACT and SAT, and in 2010, it actually outranked Wisconsin on the ACT … A follow-up for Scott Walker | The Beast Surprisingly, Walker has already been asked repeatedly about his admission that “we thought about that” when Murphy suggest planting agents provocateurs among the Wisconsin protesters . Even more surprisingly, Walker has essentially … swell says: RT @Emergentculture : R.T Wisconsin Protesters sleeping in sub-freezing temps due to lock-out. http://bit.ly/dLLboM #wiunion @timlohrentz :
Continue reading …Click here to view this media As Ed Schultz noted tonight, the GOP governors appearing on the Sunday bobblehead shows all had their talking points ready and were on the same page with their defense of Wisconsin governor Scott Walker — Wisconsin is broke, Democratic Senators are cowards and public employees have it way too good. But as Ed noted, one Republican governor in Maine let the cat out of the bag with what their real agenda is: enacting so-called ‘Right to Work’ laws and busting unions. LePage: ‘We’re going after right-to-work’ : Maine Gov. Paul LePage said Saturday he would push forcefully ahead with right-to-work legislation in his state, even if it means a Wisconsin-style fight with unions. In an interview at the National Governors Association, the Republican praised Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and couched his own proposal in the language of liberty loved by tea partiers. “He’s got a big challenge, and quite frankly, once they start reading our budget they’re going to leave Wisconsin and come to Maine because we’re going after right to work,” LePage told POLITICO. “I believe that the Declaration of Independence says ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,’” he said. “Whenever someone forces me to do something against my will, they’re infringing upon my freedoms and my liberties. And that’s what I think we’re doing in Maine when we have fair share, which means that you are required to belong to a union, you’re required to pay dues but you don’t want to participate. I find that to be against everything the United States of America stands for.” LePage said he’s “never inspired by a fight,” but that Wisconsin is unquestionably an impetus behind a renewed GOP push to demand concessions from public-sector employees and to go after union power. LePage said people who want to join unions have that right, but stressed that no one should be forced into the decision. “I believe if an individual wants to join organized labor and work under a union contract, they should have the legal right to do so,” he said. “At the same token, a person who does not want to work under organized labor and wants to work should have the ability to do so without the threat of having to join and having to pay dues to organized labor.” “It’s that simple,” he said. “It’s all about freedom and liberty.” “Freedom and liberty” huh? I don’t think so, Governor LePage. As Ed pointed out, Maine workers cannot be forced to join a union already : LePage’s comment that Maine workers are forced to join a union has sparked debate. Private sector workers cannot be forced to join a union under the freedom of association clause in the First Amendment, a finding backed by several court decisions. State laws differ on public employees. According to Marc Ayotte, the executive director of the Maine Labor Relations Board, Maine law follows the guidelines of the association clause in prohibiting public workers from being forced to join a union. However, most collective bargaining agreements in the public sector require workers opting out of the union to pay a “service fee” to unions. Ayotte said the fee is less than full union dues. It’s required because Maine law currently obligates public employee unions to represent nonunion workers during grievances and other matters. The service fee obligation for public employees is at the heart of the legislation sponsored by Rep. Tom Winsor, R-Norway. Winsor said last week that his right-to-work bill would eliminate the service fee requirement, as well as the provision requiring unions to represent nonunion employees. The article by the Sun Journal also had a statement from someone from The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation claiming that those workers do not actually have that freedom because they’re forced to pay a fee if they opt out of the joining the union. You’ve got to love the names these organizations give themselves. Right to Work is nothing more than the right to bust a union financially. Unions are still forced to represent workers that opt out of union membership, so they force those workers to pay a fine in states like Maine. If they really weren’t just about breaking the unions, they would change the laws so the unions are no longer forced to represent anyone who opts out of joining. Let them come in and bargain for their own wages, not have any recourse other than hiring their own attorney if they get fired or hurt on the job and if a company decides to pay them less than their union counterparts, so be it. You’re on your own. Given those choices most workers would not opt out of joining a union. Right to work advocates want to allow “free riders” who enjoy the benefits of union membership, without having to pay for them. Then when enough people opt out, the union goes bust and voila’, no more union. Mission accomplished. We’re going to be fighting this battle across all fifty states for years to come. We’d better get out there and make people aware of what’s going on before we all find ourselves in the same position Wisconsin and now Maine are already in. Republicans and Right to Work advocates have been itching for this fight for years and it looks like they’re finally ready to bring it. We’d better be ready to bring it right back. As Ed noted in the end of the clip where he showed Karl Rove, this is also about decimating the core of what’s left of the Democratic base. If we don’t want what’s left of the middle class decimated, we need to be following Wisconsin’s model and getting out there on the streets and making our voices heard in whatever way we can.
Continue reading …Credit: St. Louis Beacon The Tea Party side shows, Conservative pundits and psycho politicians are really becoming dangerous in America. We have child labor laws for a reason. Please, help me. Are therapists being overworked? First we had the new tea-partying senator from Utah declaring child labor laws unconstitutional. Now this, from the St. Louis Beacon : State Sen. Jane Cunningham says her quest to change Missouri’s child labor laws is driven by her belief that the current restrictions are “implying that government can make a better decision than a parent.” But Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, takes exception to critics who contend that her proposed changes, contained in SB 222, would put children younger than 16 in danger. Cunningham cites a series of provisions in her bill that bar children younger than 16 from working in certain professions or workplaces deemed dangerous, such as mines, quarries, stone-cutting or plants manufacturing explosives. As it stands, current Missouri law bars regular employment of children younger than 14 — except in specific professions such as acting — and imposes strict restrictions on employed children age 14 and 15, including the hours they are allowed to work. Children age 14 and 15 must obtain signed permits from the school they attend. Cunningham said that she believes it’s improper to saddle schools with the responsibility of deciding whether a child younger than 16 should be allowed to work. She also contends that many parents and their children already are violating the state’s current labor laws, which she says are “so over the top” and prevent parents from “teaching a work ethic to their children.” She cited her own two sons, who she said raised their own money as young teens so that each could buy a car when he turned 16. Now adults, both valued the work ethic they learned, she said. But Cunninghan’s bill already is generating heavy criticism, particularly from labor unions and allied groups . The critics point to the bill’s official summary : “This act modifies the child labor laws. It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age 14. Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed. It also repeals the requirement that a child aged 14 or 15 obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed. Children under 16 will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished. It also removes the authority of the director of the Division of Labor Standards to inspect employers who employ children and to require them to keep certain records for children they employ. It also repeals the presumption that the presence of a child in a workplace is evidence of employment.” Cunningham’s objections extend to the current law’s requirement that children 14 or 15 work no more than three hours a day on school days, no more than eight hours on a non-school day, and that they cannot work before 7 a.m. or after 9 p.m. “The hour restrictions are so tight,” she said. “There are many jobs where you can work after 9 p.m.,” such as restaurants. She also objects to allowing the state’s director of Labor Standards to walk into businesses to check on their employment of children. As time goes by, her reasons become wackier and wackier. Reminds me of Sharron Angle. I truly believe people don’t know who they are voting for anymore: Jane Cunningham thinks child labor laws insult parents Cunningham views Missouri’s laws, which limit the number of hours young people can work and ban them from working past 9 p.m., as an intrusion on parents’ rights. Actually, they are a help to parents. Without those restrictions, you have a scenario in which Susie, 13, is working at a sub shop. She has homework and she’s supposed to get off at 8 p.m., but the shift manager needs her to stay and close up because Fred didn’t show up for work. Susie calls her mom, who protests, but the boss is adamant and Susie really wants to keep her job so mom agrees, just this once. And pretty soon “just this once” becomes the routine. I have watched this happen with a 16-year-old, and only the labor laws keep employers from demanding unreasonable service from the under-16 workforce. Cunningham has a profound dislike of government, and thinks it does almost nothing right. But child labor laws are a good thing, and Cunningham isn’t likely to find many allies in her strange quest to change them. Yep, they want to take us back to the good ol’ days, all right :
Continue reading …Juan Cole reports on the worsening situation in Libya as Qaddafi’s son incites supporters to attack protesters: Saif al-Islam Qaddafi, son of the besieged dictator, has been caught on a smart phone video whipping up a crowd of ‘police’ and other supporters last Saturday to massacre protesters (he asks them ‘do you need guns?’ They shout, ‘yes.’) Saif al-Islam Qaddafi had earlier given interviews in which he told Western reporters that there is nothing going on in Libya, everything is calm, everyone loves his father, and it is the media whipping up people and causing a potential civil war . Then later he accused the protesters of being al-Qaeda and terrorists. When Saif addressed the nation on t.v., his address was projected on a wall in Benghazi and people threw mounds of shoes at the image all the time he was speaking. Another indication of the murderous and duplicitous character of the Qaddafi regime was that it sent a fighter jet to bomb a rebel-held air base at Ajdabiya, though the Tripoli government immediately denied it . The BBC reporter in Libya, however, reports that the plane behaved suspiciously and did not in the end seem to bomb anything of value. This incident may be another indication that Qaddafi cannot actually depend on his officer corps, many of whom are probably looking for the first opportunity to defect. Muammar Qaddafi even said there were no protests in the streets of his country, drawing a charge from US envoy to the UN Susan Rice that the old dictator is ‘delusional.’ British Prime Minister David Cameron’s hopes of convincing his allies to establish a no-fly zone over Libya to prevent bombings like the one on Monday are running into resistance from other NATO members, many of whom already feel militarily stretched in Afghanistan and who appear to feel that a no-fly zone might draw them into use of land troops, which most don’t have to spare (not to mention the expense, at a time when Western budgets are broken). Analysts concur that any such operation would be complex.
Continue reading …Retired Service Employees International Union President Andy Stern was recently interviewed by Journolist organizer and Washington Post staff writer Ezra “the Constitution is confusing because it was written more than a hundred years ago” Klein. In response to a question from Klein about “the animosity between unions and workplaces” (that is what Klein says he said), Stern made an interesting assertion that most readers probably took at face value: We grew up in that culture. In the '30s, people didn't want us to exist. We had to do sit-down strikes . . . we had socialist and communist tendencies. We grew up, to speak in Marxist terms, in a world with a lot more class struggle. It's not viewed through that light anymore. Really? “Permit” me to disagree. Stern's statement about the relative lack of socialist and communist tendencies was arguably true of the U.S. labor movement until the mid-1990s. It was then that Lane Kirkland, famous for orchestrating aid for Poland's Solidarity movement in the 1980s, stepped down as head of the AFL-CIO, after which the organization, according to an Arch Puddington column at Freedom House, deliberately disengaged from international involvement with worker organization efforts in totalitarian countries. Since then, the leadership of the U.S. labor movement has lurched steadily leftward. That this directional shift has occurred as public-sector union representation has grown, while private-sector representation has declined, is hardly a coincidence. So what other evidence is there that Big Labor in the U.S. and world socialists have once again become quite cozy? On Friday, Meredith Jessup at The Blaze, Glenn Beck's online journalism outlet, provided some (bolds are mine): Last fall, leftist ideological groups of socialists and communists teamed up with American labor unions to march together for “One Nation.” Now, as labor leaders struggle to maintain a stranglehold on collective bargaining privileges in Wisconsin, the same groups are once again marching together under a banner claiming unions are the heart of the American dream.
Continue reading …Connecting Bush, Not Obama to High Prices:
Continue reading …A Wisconsin Democrat Assemblyman turned to a Republican Assemblywoman in the middle of a legislative session Friday and said, “You are f–king dead.” Despite the following report from the Northwestern at 12:53 PM Monday, no major media outlet other than Fox News has covered this disgusting story: Rep. Gordon Hintz, D-Oshkosh, called Rep. Michelle Litjens, R-Winneconne, Monday morning to apologize for his comments that Litjens described as containing an obscenity and the words “you’re dead.” Last week, he accepted responsibility for being issued an ordinance violation for visiting a massage parlor in Appleton that was the subject of a prostitution sting. The Daily Caller's Jeff Poor on Monday linked to the website of Wisconsin's Newsradio 620 WTMJ which judging by the first comment reported as early as 10:43 AM: Last Friday…. after the Assembly voted to engross the Budget Repair Bill, Hintz turned to a female colleague, Rep. Michelle Litjens and said: “You are F***king dead!” In this post-Gabrielle Giffords world, with calls for a new civility, a man that was just busted in the middle of a prostitution sting says “You are f–king dead” to a woman on the floor of the Wisconsin assembly, and America's media couldn't care less. Despite this being reported no later than 10:43 AM, a Google news search identified that apart from Wisconsin outlets, only Fox and conservative websites thought this was at all newsworthy. As of 12:30 AM Tuesday, according to LexisNexis, no major news outlets reported this event. Closed-caption records for ABC's “World News,” CBS's “Evening News,” and NBC's “Night News” also found no coverage of this issue. Imagine for a moment Hintz was a Republican and Litjens a Democrat. This likely would have been the lead story for all three broadcast evening news programs as well as the focus of every hour of reporting on CNN and MSNBC with calls for Hintz's resignation. But much like what happened at ABC's town hall meeting when a survivor of the Giffords shootings said “You are dead” to a Tea Party leader in the audience, our media clearly don't care when liberals publicly threaten conservatives. Now this standard extends to a male Democrat elected official vulgarly assaulting a female Republican on an Assembly floor. Makes one think it's journalism that's bleeping dead! (H/T Weasel Zippers )
Continue reading …BROTMAN & SHORT Yolanda Be Cool & DCUP – We No Speak Americano Bass Boost Expose Transgressions and Set Boundaries on Stimulus Packages Rod 2.0:Beta #gay #news #lgbt: GLAAD Files FCC Complaint Against … GLAAD and the National Hispanic Media Coalition have filed a joint complaint with the Federal Communications Commission against Liberman Broadcasting and KRCA. The complaint responds to broadcasts of the popular Spanish-language … Joe. My. God.: GLAAD Files FCC Complaint Against Anti-Gay Spanish … In a joint move with the National Hispanic Coalition, GLAAD announced today that it is filing an FCC complaint against the Spanish-language show, Jose Luis sin Censura, which routinely features anti-LGBT hate speech and has encouraged … Pam's House Blend:: 1PM ET: GLAAD, National Hispanic Media … NOTE: There is an online press conference featuring Presidents of GLAAD and NHMC at 1PM EST. Live video by Ustream Just in: The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) and the National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC) today … THE INDEPENDENT FORUM: FCC NPRM – Addressing Unintended Consequences Three Senators Look For USF Changes To Get More Funds For Their States. Rockefeller Pushes D-Block Legislation. Walden May Pursue Incentive Auction Legislation. Retransmission Lobbying Intensifies At FCC Prior To FCC Anticipated … House Republicans Move To Block FCC Internet Regulations With a 244-181 vote, Republican leaders succeeded in attaching an amendment to a sweeping spending bill that would bar the FCC from using government money to implement its new “network neutrality” regulations. … PRIResDev says: . @ethanzuckerman did, too. RT @lrainie : FCC 's Steve Waldman coins term for most important kind of news : “broccoli journalism” – #infoneeds
Continue reading …Noam Chomsky on Wisconsin Protests (Against Gov. Walker’s Bill to Kill State Unions) Iraqi War Veterans in Solidarity With Public Workers Against Walker’s Budget Bill I Know We Can Do It Wisconsin! Wisconsin's Walker to absent Democrats: 24 hours to return … Reuters – Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott Walker said on Monday that absent senate Democrats have 24 hours to return and vote on a measure to reduce the power of public sector unions or the state will miss out on opportunity to … Wisconsin's Walker to absent Democrats: 24 hours to return … Reuters – Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott Walker said on Monday that absent senate Democrats have 24 hours to return and vote on a measure to reduce the … Wisconsin's Walker to absent Democrats: 24 hours to return | RKS … Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott walker vocal on Monday that at sea senate Democrats opine 24 hours to benefit and vote on a stirring to deteriorate the potentiality of civic organ unions or the construe commit blonde outermost on … Wisconsin's Walker to absent Democrats: 24 hours to return … Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott Walker said on Monday that absent senate Democrats have 24 hours to return and vote on a measure to reduce the power of public. Quite the World, Isn't It? Why Wisconsin Matters to All of Us … More ominously, though, in Wisconsin Walker excluded from his union-busting agenda the state’s police and firefighters, who represent two of the three forces that historically have been used to violently suppress labor. … rudykins says: RT @LiberalFeeds : Wisconsin: Walker 's latest attempt to shut down protests: Photo courtesy of the SEIU Republican Governor Scott W… http://bit.ly/hPkiGt
Continue reading …