Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 70)
Freed US hikers: Iran held us because we’re American

Joshua Fattal and Shane Bauer tell press conference of difficult prison conditions and surprise of sudden release Declaring that they were detained because of their nationality, not their actions, two American hikers held for more than two years in an Iranian prison came home on Sunday, ending a diplomatic and personal ordeal with a sharp rebuke of the country that accused them of crossing the border from Iraq. Joshua Fattal and Shane Bauer, both 29, were freed last week under a $1m (£640,000) bail deal and arrived on Wednesday in Oman, greeted by relatives and fellow hiker Sarah Shourd, who was released last year . Their saga began in July 2009 with what they called ‘a wrong turn into the wrong country.’ The three say they were hiking together in Iraq’s relatively peaceful Kurdish region along the border with Iran when Iranian guards detained them. They always maintained their innocence, saying they might have accidentally wandered into Iran. The two men were convicted of spying last month. Shourd, to whom Bauer proposed marriage while they were imprisoned, was charged but freed before any trial. The men took turns reading statements at a news conference on Sunday in New York, surrounded by relatives and with Shourd at their side. Fattal said he wanted to make clear that while he and Bauer “applaud Iranian authorities for finally making the right decision”, they do not deserve undue credit for ending what they had “no right and no justification to start in the first place.” “From the very start, the only reason we have been held hostage is because we are American,” he said, adding that “Iran has always tied our case to its political disputes with the US” The two countries severed diplomatic ties three decades ago during the hostage crisis . Since then, both have tried to limit the other’s influence in the Middle East, and the US sees Iran as the greatest nuclear threat in the region. The hikers’ detention, Bauer said, was “never about crossing the unmarked border between Iran and Iraq. We were held because of our nationality.” He said they did not know whether they actually had crossed the border. The irony of it all, he said, “is that Sarah, Josh and I oppose the US policies towards Iran which perpetuate this hostility.” The two also told of difficult prison conditions, where they were held in near isolation. “Many times, too many times, we heard the screams of other prisoners being beaten and there was nothing we could do to help them,” said Fattal. Bauer added: “How can we forgive the Iranian government when it continues to imprison so many other innocent people and prisoners of conscience?” They said their phone calls with family members amounted to a total of 15 minutes over two years, and they had to go on repeated hunger strikes to receive letters. Eventually, they were told – falsely – that their families had stopped writing them letters. “We lived in a world of lies and false hope,” Fattal said. Fattal called their release a ‘total surprise’. On Wednesday, he said, they had just finished their brief daily open-air exercise and expected, as on other days, to be blindfolded and led back to their 2.5m by 4m cell. Instead, the prison guards took them downstairs, took their fingerprints and gave them civilian clothes. They were not told where they were going. The guards then led them to another part of the prison, where they met a diplomatic envoy from Oman, whose first words to the pair were “Let’s go home.” Hours later, the Americans were driven to the airport, then flown to Oman. Shourd was with the families to greet them on the tarmac at a royal airfield in Oman’s capital, Muscat. Close to midnight on Wednesday, Fattal and Bauer bounded down the steps from the blue-and-white plane. The men appeared very thin and pale, but in good health. The first hint of change in the case came last week when Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Fattal and Bauer could be released within days, but wrangling within the country’s leadership delayed the efforts. On Wednesday, Iranian lawyer Masoud Shafiei secured the necessary judicial approval for the bail – $500,000 for each man. Iran’s foreign ministry called their release a gesture of Islamic mercy. Iran United States Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ed Balls sets out Labour’s ‘tough’ stance on deficit reduction

To win back voters shadow chancellor says party must have the ‘discipline and strength’ to tackle deepening financial crisis Shadow chancellor Ed Balls will attempt to begin restoring Labour’s credibility on the economy by promising that before the next election he will set out demanding and independently scrutinised fiscal rules for cutting the deficit. He will also tell his party conference in Liverpool that if there is any windfall from the sale of state-owned bank shares such as RBS, the cash will be used exclusively to pay down the deficit and not boost state spending. Adopting a more hawkish stance on the economy, Balls will say: “We will never have credibility unless we have the discipline and the strength to take tough decisions.” Labour is still trailing the Conservatives heavily in the polls on economic management, especially in the south, despite growing public concerns over low growth and the government’s austerity package. The tone of the speech by Balls implies an admission by Labour high command that its repeated calls for extra spending in the short term to produce growth need to be balanced more clearly by a credible emphasis on a longer-term programme to bring the deficit under control. Labour officials recognise that the party leader, Ed Miliband, must use the next few days to shift perceptions on Labour and the economy. Miliband’s pre-conference emphasis has been fixed on helping the squeezed middle, targeting energy and train prices, as well as reducing university tuition fees. But shifting the ground on to the chief electoral battleground on the economy, Balls will warn in stark terms: “The country and the whole world is facing the threat of a lost decade of economic stagnation.” He will also challenge the Tories head on over their central claim that the economic crisis is simply one of excessive public debt, and instead warn of a global growth crisis, which is deepening and becoming more dangerous by the day. In a key passage of his speech, he will embrace the two fiscal goals set out by the coalition government – bringing the country’s current budget back into balance, and ensuring the national debt is on a downward curve as a proportion of GDP. He will also promise the route to achieving these aims will be monitored by the Office for Budget Responsibility. The OBR was set up after claims that Labour politicians – including Balls – put improper political pressure on Treasury officials to produce over-optimistic forecasts. But Balls will not spell out on Monday the speed with which he would bring the deficit into balance, arguing that it is too early to give such a detailed timetable. Before the election, then-chancellor Alistair Darling promised to halve public sector net borrowing as a share of GDP over four years. He enshrined this commitment in law, but the effort to reassure the bond markets and the electorate foundered as the party went down to its worst post-war defeat. Despite some pressure from inside the shadow cabinet, Balls is not expected to offer any new apologies for Labour’s stewardship of the economy in government, such as over-spending prior to the advent of the banking crash. He has already apologised for Labour’s failure to regulate the City more effectively, and Miliband has admitted that Gordon Brown was wrong to suggest Labour had abolished boom or bust. Balls insists Labour went into the 1998 recession with a lower debt-GDP ratio than France, Germany, Italy and Japan so there is no need for further contrition. Some Labour backbenchers such as Stella Creasy are urging Balls to go further, by giving the OBR powers to tell the Treasury to change course if it is to meet its spending and deficit mandates. She has also proposed the Treasury select committee be given powers to instruct the OBR to mount specific inquiries. Neither of these proposals has been rejected by the Miliband team. Balls will try to counter claims that his commitment to growth stimulus leaves him blind to the deficit, saying “growth will not magic the deficit away”. He will say: “A steadier, more balanced medium-term plan to get the deficit down will still mean difficult decisions and tough choices in the years ahead that will face any government. Tough choices on tax and spending – like the cuts to welfare, education and Home Office budgets that we set out before the election.” He will also call for discipline in public and private sector pay. “It will not be enough to expose that David Cameron and George Osborne have got the economy badly wrong. We still know today what we recognised in 1994 – we will never have credibility unless we have the discipline and the strength to take tough decisions.” On a one-day visit to the conference David Miliband dismissed reports of tensions between the brothers: “My best advice, being in politics for 15 to 20 years, is that one year into a parliament don’t look at the opinion polls.” But the former home secretary David Blunkett urged Miliband to do more to win over the country, saying “There’s no questions whatsoever that he has to lift his profile, that we have to have seminal announcements and moments when he can reach the electorate, when he’s talking about things that really matter to people on the ground.” Labour conference 2011 Ed Balls Economic policy European debt crisis Labour Public finance Economic growth (GDP) European banks Labour conference Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Three men charged with plotting suicide bombing campaign

Six men in total – all from Birmingham – charged over terrorism offences after arrests in city last week Three men from Birmingham who were arrested a week ago as part of a major operation by counter-terrorism police in the Midlands have been charged with plotting a suicide bombing campaign in the UK. Two of them, Irfan Nasser and Irfan Khalid, aged 30 and 26 and from the Sparkhill and Sparkbrook areas, also face charges of making a martyrdom film, travelling to Pakistan for training in terrorism – including bomb making, weapons and poison making – collecting money for terrorism, and constructing a home-made explosive device. Ashik Ali, 26, from Balsall Heath, was charged with collecting money for terrorism, stating an intention to be a suicide bomber, and involvement in recruiting others for terrorist acts. A fourth man, Rahin Ahmed, 25, from Mosely, was charged with assisting others to travel to Pakistan for terrorism training, and investing and managing money for terrorist acts. It is alleged that between Christmas Day 2010 and 19 September this year, they were preparing, or helping others prepare, to commit acts of terrorism. Two other men, Bahader Ali and Mohammed Rizwan, aged 28 and 32 and from Sparkbrook, were also charged with failing to disclose information. It is alleged that between 29 July and 19 September this year, both had information which they knew may help prevent the commission of an act of terrorism. Bahader Ali, who is Ashik Ali’s brother, was also charged with terrorist fund raising. Last week’s arrests were unarmed, pre-planned and intelligence-led, according to West Midlands police, which added that a seventh man from Birmingham, aged 20, continues to be questioned. Officers have until Thursday to charge him, release him, or apply for a further warrant of detention. The six charged men will appear at West London magistrates court in Hammersmith on Monday. The arrests took place from 11.30am on Sunday 18 September, with the last suspect detained at about 1am on the Monday morning. The raids took place in several deprived areas of the city that have sizeable Muslim populations. The operation involved MI5, with officers from Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism command supporting the Birmingham-based force. West Midlands police said last week the “large-scale operation” had been running for some time and had been subject to regular review, adding that the action was necessary “in order to ensure public safety”. UK security and terrorism Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
PM David Cameron Denounces ‘Looting,’ ‘Criminality.’ No, Of Course He’s Not Talking About Bankers Who Crashed Global Economy

Click here to view this media British Prime Minister David Cameron was a guest today on This Week with Christiane Amanpour, and it left me flabbergasted. How much pure crap can one man spew in such a short period of time? Let’s be clear about this one thing: Austerity measures in the UK (and everywhere else) are not about “making our economy pay properly for itself.” It’s about picking up the staggering casino tab for the bankers, and anyone with two synapses to rub together knows it: AMANPOUR: Let’s switch to the economy and to what we all saw in England during August, the riots on the street. CAMERON: Well, first of all, I don’t think it was in any way linked to the economy. These were not protests. They were not political arguments. They weren’t political demonstrations. It was, quite simply, looting. It was criminality. AMANPOUR: You’ve instituted austerity measures. The economic growth is not there. People are saying now, as they look at austerity, that perhaps your governments are focusing on the wrong thing and that it should be about growth and employment. What do you say to that? CAMERON: Well, we obviously need growth and employment in our country. And actually, the British economy has grown this year. We have created jobs since the election, particularly jobs in the private sector. But the key point is this: You have to remember that Britain was forecast to have a bigger budget deficit than Greece. It was forecast to have the biggest budget deficit in the whole of the G-20. If we haven’t got on top of our deficit and shown the world we had a plan to make our economy pay properly for itself , then we would have seen interest rates go up, we would have seen confidence sapped out of our economy. You can see in other parts of Europe where exactly that has happened. We have to understand, this is a debt crisis. It’s not a traditional cyclical recession, where you just turn on the money taps. You’ve got to deal with the debts. You’ve got to show the world you can pay for your debts, as well as having a very strong growth strategy. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that these riots took place in a time of severe austerity cuts, right? And let’s just gloss over the fact that a police killing kicked off the cycle of violence, because polite people still pretend that cops don’t routinely brutalize people. The thing that the people at the top so blithely ignore is that social programs are holding what’s left of the lower classes together. What seems like a small number on the spreadsheet translates to severe hardship and even death at the bottom of the social ladder, and to slash the safety net while the bankers go unpunished is just asking for trouble: “I don’t think the implications of this have been fully thought through or accepted yet,” said Pepe Egger, western Europe analyst for London-based consultancy Exclusive Analysis. “What we have here is the result of decades of growing divisions and marginalization, but austerity will almost certainly make it worse. Yes, the police can restore control with massive force but that is not sustainable either in the long term. You have to accept that this may happen again.” Speaking to Reuters late on Tuesday, looters and other local people in east London pointed to the wealth gap as the underlying cause, also blaming what they saw as police prejudice and a host of recent scandals. Spending cuts were now hitting the poorest hardest, they said, and after tales of politicians claiming excessive expenses, alleged police corruption and bankers getting rich it was their turn to take what they wanted “They set the example,” said one youth after riots in the London district of Hackney. “It’s time to loot.” And what an example it was, and continues to be.

Continue reading …
Saudi women to be given right to vote and stand for election in four years

King Abdullah’s ‘cautious reform’ will not take effect until 2015 but welcomed as cultural shift in conservative Islamic country Women in Saudi Arabia will be given the right to vote and to stand for election within four years, King Abdullah announced on Sunday, in a cultural shift that appears to mark a new era in the rigidly conservative Islamic kingdom. The right to vote in council elections will not take effect until 2015, and women will still be banned from casting ballots in elections this Thursday. However, the 87-year-old monarch has invited women to take part in the next shura council, a governing body that supervises legislation. King Abdullah has been trying to implement what he has described as “cautious reform” in the fundamentalist state, where women are strictly denied civic freedoms or any public role. “Because we refuse to marginalise women in society in all roles that comply with sharia, we have decided, after deliberation with our senior ulama (clerics) and others … to involve women in the shura council as members, starting from the next term,” he said in a speech. “Women will be able to run as candidates in the municipal election and will even have a right to vote.” Commentators in Saudi Arabia mostly reacted warmly to the announcement, but said broader change was needed to bring Saudi Arabia into line with other countries. Several said the move was a litmus test of the country’s appetite for more far-reaching reform. “So I can vote, but I can’t get a driver’s licence,” said one Saudi women from Jeddah, who said she had to remain anonymous. “If I use my name I may be breaching the guardianship law here.” Laws demand that a male guardian – a father, brother, or son – accompany women on any trip outside the house. When some women in Riyadh attempted to test it earlier in the year by driving car s, the move was seen as a provocation by authorities and several of the drivers were arrested. Separation of the sexes in public is also strictly enforced. Some Saudi observers say the announcement on Sunday is a nod to the popular participation showcased by the Arab spring that has led to revolts elsewhere in the region. However, democratic themes have so far won little resonance in Saudi Arabia, which is ruled by an absolute monarchy that defers to the Qur’an as the country’s constitution. King Abdullah emerged as a supporter of women playing a greater role in Saudi society two years ago when he was photographed with a group of young female students, none of whom wore the full niqab (face cover) common in Saudi society. He has since backed the establishment of a non-segregated university and has discussed appointing more women to senior positions. Both moves have drawn criticism from senior clerics and even members of the ruling family. An academic at a Riyadh University said she remained sceptical that the reforms would be implemented in time for the 2015 municipal vote. “The possibility for political participation is open, because it being discussed,” she said. “But I am not sure if it will happen. I would love to be able to vote, and think women will flock to the polls [if given the chance]. But I don’t think many will run [as candidates]. “I respect the king for trying to make a change,” she said. “This might encourage women, but they will have to fight hard against social conservatism, even if legally they are allowed to run.” The academic said the Arab spring had created a “sense of embarrassment that so much change is happening all around and the kingdom is standing still”. However, she claimed that the wholesale democratic freedoms being demanded in North Africa and on Saudi Arabia’s borders, in Yemen and in Bahrain, would not suit the desert kingdom. “Saudis do not want to change the royal family,” she said. ” They want … change, but under the family’s stewardship.” A Jeddah-based female member of the ruling family said: “People have it good here. They are sensible enough to know what to demand and what not to. What the king has done is a very good thing, but he knows and we all know that you cannot push a society like this too far too soon. “The west has come to understand that too. Democracy is something that will take the light of generations to arrive here.” Saudi Arabia Middle East King Abdullah Women Arab and Middle East unrest Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US hikers land in New York after two years in Iranian jail

Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal arrive in city following release under $1m bail deal mediated by Oman and Iraq last week Two Americans released from an Iranian prison have landed in New York after being held for more than two years on spying charges. Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer arrived in the US on Sunday after being released and flown to Oman last week under a $1m (£640,000) bail deal. They were greeted by friends and relatives including Sarah Shourd, their fellow hiker who was freed last year. The three were detained in July 2009 along the Iran-Iraq border. They say they were only hiking in Iraq’s relatively peaceful Kurdish region. Since her release last year, Shourd has lived in Oakland, California. Bauer, a freelance journalist, grew up in Onamia, Minnesota, and Fattal, an environmental activist, is from Philadelphia. United States Iran Middle East Oman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tymoshenko trial jeopardises Ukraine trade deal, warns EU

Conviction of president’s rival would be ‘incompatible with EU values’, says minister during Yalta visit The EU is threatening to downgrade relations with Ukraine and frustrate its attempts to move closer into Europe’s orbit unless the former Soviet republic drops a landmark case rapidly heading towards a verdict against its former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko. Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine’s president, has been warned that Europe sees the case against Tymoshenko as a politically motivated attempt to silence his chief rival. EU officials say a conviction would be “incompatible with EU values” and jeopardise the finalisation of a free trade agreement that would solidify the country’s ties to Brussels. Speaking in Yalta after a two-hour private meeting with Yanukovych, Stefan Fule, the EU enlargement minister, said relations would “be hardly the same between the EU and Ukraine” if the charges against Tymoshenko were not dropped. He had made clear, he said, that the case amounted to no less than a judgment on the democratic credentials needed to forge close ties with the bloc. Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt said: “Clearly this particular trial is conducted under laws that would have no place in any other European country and should have no place in a country aspiring to European membership.” Tymoshenko’s trial is due to resume on Tuesday, after a surprise two-week delay. Optimists saw the delay as a sign Yanukovych was looking for a way to give in to EU demands without losing face, while cynics said he hoped to avoid the topic being raised ahead of several EU-Ukraine meetings. Tymoshenko was charged in May with exceeding her authority as prime minister when she signed a 2009 gas deal with the Russian prime minister, Vladimir Putin, to put an end to a disruptive gas war that had left much of eastern Europe freezing. The deal left Ukraine saddled with what Yanukovych’s administration considers an intolerably high price. Yanukovych’s attempts to renegotiate the deal with Moscow have so far been rebuffed, prompting him to threaten taking the issue to an international court. Yanukovych flew to Moscow on Saturday for rare talks with Putin and the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev. The informal visit, coming shortly after the announcement of Putin’s bid to return to the Kremlin , was designed to ease tensions. Russia’s leaders are said to want Ukraine to forego closer ties with the EU in favour of a Moscow-led customs union that is the latest Russian attempt to solidify its influence in the region. Tymoshenko has used the trial as a platform to denounce a growing democratic deficit since Yanukovych came to power last year. She called the judge a puppet and accused the president of attacking his rivals “just like Stalin”. On 5 August she was detained for violating court rules and has been languishing in a Kiev jail ever since. Supporters and friends, both Ukrainian and European, have been refused permission to visit her and have begun to worry about her physical and mental health. “She will have to be quite strong in order to overcome this,” said Arseny Yatsenyuk, a former parliament speaker and current opposition leader. “It’s clear this is not a war on corruption, this a war on political opposition.” Ukrainian officials have denied Tymoshenko is the target of a witch hunt. Mario David, a European MP, said during a visit to Ukraine this month: “This is too much of a political trial. When it’s not only Tymoshenko, but 17 people in her government that are facing problems with justice, that is too much of a co-ordinated effort to make the opposition collapse.” Yanukovych, whose election was seen as ringing the death knell for Ukraine’s western-leaning Orange Revolution, has been at pains to promote a “pragmatic” foreign policy that would balance the country between Europe and Russia, the country’s former overlord. Early overtures to Russia – including dropping attempts to join Nato and extending by 25 years Moscow’s right to base its Black Sea fleet in the Crimea – have been overshadowed by Yanukovych’s refusal to give up on the dream of EU membership. Now, opposition MPs have introduced a bill that would change the law under which Tymoshenko has been charged, giving Yanukovych a possible exit. Tymoshenko faces 10 years in prison if convicted. There are worries she will be convicted and then pardoned, which would release her from prison but ban her from politics. EU officials say that is not enough. “That would put Yanukovych in a situation like Burma,” said Anders Aslund, a former adviser to the Ukrainian government, referring to the case of Aung San Suu Kyi. “They want to sentence her and then ban her, but the cost is simply too high.” Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych Yulia Tymoshenko European Union Europe Miriam Elder guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Michael Gerson Thinks Asking the Rich to Pay Their Fair Share in Taxes Isn’t a Good Democratic Message

Click here to view this media Here’s an example of why no Democrat or President Obama should ever look to the likes of someone like Michael Gerson for advice on what makes for good campaign messaging. While discussing President Obama now campaigning on raising taxes on the rich, here was some of Gerson’s input after Chris Matthews asked him whether he thought it would hurt or help the president in the upcoming election, given that he’s “now seen as the guy taking sides against the rich, he says aren’t paying taxes.” GERSON: I’ll tell you what. I think the problem is not that he’s being to harsh on the rich. I think the problem is he’s being irrelevant to the only debate in American politics, which is growth and job creation. He had an anemic plan he brought forward that was largely recycled stuff and then even swamped that plan with now class warfare rhetoric. People are concerned with Europe in economic decline, with the possibility of a second dip of an American recession. How do we get growth back in this economy? The president’s not even speaking to this issue. After some of the panel acknowledging that anything President Obama has proposed to try to get our economy back on track has been knocked down by Republicans and Chris Matthews talking about how some fairness in our tax system has finally gotten the progressive base animated and supportive of what they’re hearing from the president, Matthews went to his “Matthews Meter” for the week, the question being whether “tax the rich” will get Obama votes in 2012. Three of them agreed that it was a smart move that were on the panel this week. Naturally, Gerson disagreed and then pulled out the angry black man card, or if not that, at least the heaven forbid anyone should be angry about the real class warfare we’ve seen waged on the poor and middle class card. GERSON: But I think Obama’s basic problem here, political problem, is changing his narrative completely. He ran the last time as the candidate of hope, inclusion, progress. Now he’s running as the candidate of anger and redistribution. That’s not a particularly good Democratic message. As Andrew Sullivan rightfully pointed out, a large part of the reason the president has finally resorted to just calling out Republicans instead of continuing to try to work with them was because Republicans have obstructed everything President Obama has tried to do and he can’t keep running on the meme of bipartisanship because he “looks like Lucy with the football.” Can I just say amen to Andrew Sullivan here with that statement and for pointing out to Gerson how ridiculous it is to say that President Obama should continue to pretend that Republicans are ever going to work with him on anything. Most of us on the left have been tired of the President continuing to pretend like the Republicans were not the obstructionists they obviously showed themselves to be quite a long time ago, but Gerson apparently thinks it’s still worth beating that dead horse here. Note to Michael Gerson. It’s exactly a good Democratic message that we’ve got horrible income disparity in the United States and asking the rich to pay their fair share and a call for some “shared sacrifice” is a message any Democratic candidate should be running on rather than asking for more austerity measures and tax breaks for the rich, which is apparently the Republican’s only plan to supposedly create jobs. The Republicans’ economic policies are nothing but a race to the bottom for what’s left of our dwindling middle class and American workers and Gerson’s message here pretty well resonates with one group of people, and that’s the far right of the Republican Party. And they’re not going to do anything to help President Obama get reelected no matter what he says on the campaign trail.

Continue reading …
Saudi Arabia gives women right to vote

Saudi women will have the right to stand for office and vote in future local elections, says King Abdullah Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah has said women will have the right to stand and vote in future local elections and join the advisory Shura council as full members. “Because we refuse to marginalise women in society in all roles that comply with sharia, we have decided, after deliberation with our senior ulama [clerics] and others … to involve women in the Shura council as members, starting from the next term,” Abdullah, 87, said in a speech. “Women will be able to run as candidates in the municipal election and will even have a right to vote,” he added. Liberal activists in the country have long called for greater rights for women, who are barred from travelling, working or having medical operations without the permission of a male relative and are forbidden from driving. The changes will come after elections on Thursday, in which women are barred from voting or standing for office. Saudi Arabia Gender Middle East Electoral reform guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Saudi Arabia gives women right to vote

Saudi women will have the right to stand for office and vote in future local elections, says King Abdullah Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah has said women will have the right to stand and vote in future local elections and join the advisory Shura council as full members. “Because we refuse to marginalise women in society in all roles that comply with sharia, we have decided, after deliberation with our senior ulama [clerics] and others … to involve women in the Shura council as members, starting from the next term,” Abdullah, 87, said in a speech. “Women will be able to run as candidates in the municipal election and will even have a right to vote,” he added. Liberal activists in the country have long called for greater rights for women, who are barred from travelling, working or having medical operations without the permission of a male relative and are forbidden from driving. The changes will come after elections on Thursday, in which women are barred from voting or standing for office. Saudi Arabia Gender Middle East Electoral reform guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …