England 243 all out; West Indies 225 all out England win by 18 runs England are still alive in the World Cup, after a flurry of late wickets rescued victory from the jaws of defeat against West Indies at the MA Chindambaram Stadium in Chennai. Graeme Swann took two wickets in his final over and Suliemen Benn was then run out to decide the Group B match. Swann took three wickets in the innings and another spinner, James Tredwell, took four. England are not definitely through to the quarter-finals, but to deny them Bangladesh must beat South Africa and West Indies must take at least a point against India this weekend. Ramnaresh Sarwan and Andre Russell had seemed to be guiding West Indies home, with a seventh-wicket partnership of 72. Russell survived a contentious decision when he was caught by Jonathan Trott on the boundary, only for the England fielder to be adjudged, by the third umpire, to have brushed the boundary marker as he fell backwards. The batsman was thus awarded a six instead. Russell was eventually lbw to Tredwell for 49 and Benn then survived a close lbw call, on review, again off the bowling of Tredwell. Sarwan was the next man out, off the first ball of Swann’s final over, caught at short leg by Ian Bell. Kemar Roach joined Benn at the crease with 21 needed for victory off 41 balls – he was dismissed on his second delivery, caught by Chris Tremlett at mid-off. The leg-spinner Devandra Bishoo was last man in for West Indies, on his international debut. After Andrew Strauss won the toss and chose to bat, the captain and Trott got off to a flying start. But the scoring rate stagnated as wickets began to fall and it fell to a man playing his first World Cup match, Luke Wright, to salvage a competitive total in an innings that did not feature a half-century or a 50 stand. Bishoo and Russell shared seven wickets and Roach bowled economically. England appeared assured of a big total after they had raced to 94 for two from 15 overs. But they lost momentum and then wickets – four men falling for 30 runs at one stage. No fours came between the 21st and 35th overs, with the pace off the ball, and Bishoo took three for 34 by using the conditions well. Russell dismissed both openers, an unsuspecting Matt Prior bowled through the gate on the back foot and Strauss mis-pulling the medium-pacer to go to a very good running catch by Chris Gayle. Trott announced himself with six fours from his first nine balls and a total in excess of 250 was on. But Trott then went tamely, three runs short of a half-century, when he chipped a Bishoo leg-break straight to Gayle at mid-wicket. Bell played himself in, only to be done for pace by the first ball of Roach’s second spell. Then Eoin Morgan’s renowned innovation backfired with an unorthodox deflection into the wicketkeeper’s gloves off Bishoo. Ravi Bopara was the third batsman to be bowled by pace and a suspicion of low bounce but Wright batted with skill and sense. His seventh-wicket partner, Tredwell, went in a run-out mix-up and Wright eventually holed out on the slog-sweep in Bishoo’s final over. England knew they would need to get Gayle early. He was gone by the end of the seventh over, but the West Indies captain still did significant damage. Gayle smashed 18 in four blows from one Tremlett over, only to be trapped lbw pushing forward to Tredwell, giving the off-spinner his first one-day international wicket. Tredwell had a second when Prior got the bails off to stump Devon Smith down the leg-side. Darren Bravo was well caught at slip by Strauss to give Tredwell his third wicket. Bopara dismissed Darren Sammy and Devon Thomas and Swann trapped Kieron Pollard lbw. Cricket World Cup 2011 England cricket team West Indies Cricket Team Cricket guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …England 243 all out; West Indies 225 all out England win by 18 runs England are still alive in the World Cup, after a flurry of late wickets rescued victory from the jaws of defeat against West Indies at the MA Chindambaram Stadium in Chennai. Graeme Swann took two wickets in his final over and Suliemen Benn was then run out to decide the Group B match. Swann took three wickets in the innings and another spinner, James Tredwell, took four. England are not definitely through to the quarter-finals, but to deny them Bangladesh must beat South Africa and West Indies must take at least a point against India this weekend. Ramnaresh Sarwan and Andre Russell had seemed to be guiding West Indies home, with a seventh-wicket partnership of 72. Russell survived a contentious decision when he was caught by Jonathan Trott on the boundary, only for the England fielder to be adjudged, by the third umpire, to have brushed the boundary marker as he fell backwards. The batsman was thus awarded a six instead. Russell was eventually lbw to Tredwell for 49 and Benn then survived a close lbw call, on review, again off the bowling of Tredwell. Sarwan was the next man out, off the first ball of Swann’s final over, caught at short leg by Ian Bell. Kemar Roach joined Benn at the crease with 21 needed for victory off 41 balls – he was dismissed on his second delivery, caught by Chris Tremlett at mid-off. The leg-spinner Devandra Bishoo was last man in for West Indies, on his international debut. After Andrew Strauss won the toss and chose to bat, the captain and Trott got off to a flying start. But the scoring rate stagnated as wickets began to fall and it fell to a man playing his first World Cup match, Luke Wright, to salvage a competitive total in an innings that did not feature a half-century or a 50 stand. Bishoo and Russell shared seven wickets and Roach bowled economically. England appeared assured of a big total after they had raced to 94 for two from 15 overs. But they lost momentum and then wickets – four men falling for 30 runs at one stage. No fours came between the 21st and 35th overs, with the pace off the ball, and Bishoo took three for 34 by using the conditions well. Russell dismissed both openers, an unsuspecting Matt Prior bowled through the gate on the back foot and Strauss mis-pulling the medium-pacer to go to a very good running catch by Chris Gayle. Trott announced himself with six fours from his first nine balls and a total in excess of 250 was on. But Trott then went tamely, three runs short of a half-century, when he chipped a Bishoo leg-break straight to Gayle at mid-wicket. Bell played himself in, only to be done for pace by the first ball of Roach’s second spell. Then Eoin Morgan’s renowned innovation backfired with an unorthodox deflection into the wicketkeeper’s gloves off Bishoo. Ravi Bopara was the third batsman to be bowled by pace and a suspicion of low bounce but Wright batted with skill and sense. His seventh-wicket partner, Tredwell, went in a run-out mix-up and Wright eventually holed out on the slog-sweep in Bishoo’s final over. England knew they would need to get Gayle early. He was gone by the end of the seventh over, but the West Indies captain still did significant damage. Gayle smashed 18 in four blows from one Tremlett over, only to be trapped lbw pushing forward to Tredwell, giving the off-spinner his first one-day international wicket. Tredwell had a second when Prior got the bails off to stump Devon Smith down the leg-side. Darren Bravo was well caught at slip by Strauss to give Tredwell his third wicket. Bopara dismissed Darren Sammy and Devon Thomas and Swann trapped Kieron Pollard lbw. Cricket World Cup 2011 England cricket team West Indies Cricket Team Cricket guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Six were arrested in Harare and accused of plotting against their country by watching Egypt and Tunisia uprising videos Six Zimbabweans accused of treason for watching videos of the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia have been granted bail after a judge said he had seen “no iota” of evidence against them. The six were arrested in Harare on 19 February with 40 other activists, students and trade unionists who were later freed due to the weak case against them. They were all attending a discussion led by the former opposition lawmaker Munyaradzi Gwisai about the north African revolutions and what they might mean for Zimbabwe. Prosecutors claimed that the group was plotting to overthrow Robert Mugabe. But on Wednesday high court judge Samuel Kudya described the evidence against the six, including Gwisai, as unsubstantiated. “I see no iota of evidence that any Zimbabwean ever contemplated any Tunisian or Egyptian revolution,” he said. The six were granted bail of Z$2,000 after Kudya rejected the prosecution’s argument that they would abscond. But he ordered the accused to report to the police three times a week. No trial date has been set. At an earlier court ruling, the accused had complained of being beaten by the police with sticks and iron bars. Defence lawyers argued that their clients were merely debating African politics and democracy at the time of the arrest. The tumult in the Arab states of north Africa has shown little sign of spreading south of the Sahara, though it has clearly put some of the continent’s longest-serving leaders on edge. In Cameroon, where Paul Biya has been president for 28 years, the government banned a Twitter text messaging service last week. During the Ugandan elections last month, which saw Yoweri Museveni extended his 25-year presidency, authorities ordered mobile phone companies to block messages referring to the Egyptian or Tunisian uprisings. In the case of Mugabe, 87, who has ruled Zimbabwe for 31 years – longer than the deposed leaders in Egypt or Tunisia – the heavier-handed response was little surprise. Over the past decade he has used the police to violently suppress any opposition. A brutal campaign of torture and intimidation by the security forces helped him cling on to power in 2008 after he lost the first round of the presidential election. His challenger, Morgan Tsvangirai, reluctantly agreed to enter a power-sharing government in order to help end a socio-economic crisis. But the coalition remains fragile, with Mugabe appearing determined to force Tsvangirai’s MDC party into quitting, which would force early elections. Last week police arrested energy minister Elton Mangoma, a co-founder of the MDC, for alleged corruption. Mangoma was freed on bail on Tuesday, with the judge saying there was no evidence he had personally gained from a deal to import petrol from South Africa. Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe Protest Tunisia Egypt Middle East Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Thursday’s New York Times featured a puffball profile by Jeremy Peters of Jay Carney, the recently installed White House press secretary and former reporter for Time magazine undergoing a trial by fire in the wake of international crises. Carney left Time after the election to become communications director for Vice President Biden before getting his White House promotion. The story headline, “ News Events Test a Veteran Reporter in Role as White House Spokesman ,” promised scrutiny that doesn’t make it into Peters’s story, which leads with its chin: Jay Carney has never been much of a partisan. His former colleagues at Time never knew which politicians he voted for. He complained privately that he felt the magazine’s coverage of the 2008 election — the one that put his current boss in the White House — was too lopsided toward Barack Obama. If you work for the White House, just how “non-partisan” can you be? My colleague Tim Graham dug into the Media Research Center archives last month and came up with a “ dossier of clues ” refuting the idea of Carney as a nonpartisan journalist. Here's a sample: “In towns like Pushkino (pop. 90,000), many Russians view the tumult sweeping Moscow with more anxiety and skepticism than do their big-city compatriots…they wonder if the destruction of Soviet communism will bring them anything more than uncertainty and hardship.” — Time reporter James Carney, September 9, 1991. “The fear that continues to fester about Bush — as we read about his periodic foreign-policy gaffes and then hear him blithely assert that what he doesn't know he can learn from his advisers–is that at 53 he has the same cavalier attitude toward knowledge that he had at 21: he could learn what he needs to know, but he doesn't seem to think it's worth his time….There was something else jarring about what Bush said [about Israel]. There is no such thing as an 'inter'-ballistic missile. These mistakes may seem minor, but taken together they suggest that Bush is still under water when grappling with foreign- and defense-policy basics.” — Time reporter James Carney playing up Bush gaffes, November 15, 1999. “As he unveiled his new-look campaign in South Carolina last week, including Oprah-style sessions with citizens and banners heralding him as A REFORMER WITH RESULTS,
Continue reading …One-in-500 women die in childbirth in Bangladesh – with cultural factors as much to blame as a lack of medical care There’s hardly a man to be seen in the maternity ward of the Maternal and Child Health Training Institute in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. Despite the lack of any law forbidding men to enter the delivery room, fathers are normally not present during the birth of their own child – an attitude that needs to change, say the country’s first midwives, who are due to graduate next month. “Men need to be involved in the labour process if we are to reduce maternal mortality,” says Mala Reberio, one of the 20 midwives being trained to international standards in Bangladesh, which is still heavily reliant on community skilled birth attendants, who lack the skill and the authority to perform more complicated deliveries. Currently, one in 500 women in Bangladesh dies during childbirth. “If [men] could see firsthand the complications of childbirth, they would be more likely to send their pregnant wives to proper medical facilities and less likely to insist on early childbirth after marriage,” says Reberio. More than 75% of deliveries take place at home, and the average age of women having their first child is just 16 years, according to the UN. Fathers are not present during the delivery. The support role is usually taken on by the father’s mother or another senior female member of the family, said Dr Roushon Ara Begum from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the organisation leading the training. However, recent figures show that attitudes towards childbirth are changing. According to the government’s Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Healthcare Survey 2010 , women are increasingly choosing to use professional medical facilities (mainly due to a growth in private practices). The proportion of women giving birth in medical facilities has more than doubled, from 9% in 2001 to 23% last year – a trend that is likely to continue as fertility rates decrease, incomes increase and education levels improve. “I would recommend to everyone to give birth in a hospital for comfort and safety,” says Samia Zakia Sultana, 20, who is expecting her first child in a few weeks. Bangladesh is on target to meet MDG5 – reducing maternal mortality. According to the BMMS 2010, the maternal mortality ratio in Bangladesh has declined from 322 per 100,000 in 2001 to 194 in 2010. However, data collection in this area is notoriously difficult and there tends to be a large margin of error and much disagreement about the exact figures. Other reports from 2010 place Bangladesh as the worst in south Asia for maternal mortality.
Continue reading …One-in-500 women die in childbirth in Bangladesh – with cultural factors as much to blame as a lack of medical care There’s hardly a man to be seen in the maternity ward of the Maternal and Child Health Training Institute in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. Despite the lack of any law forbidding men to enter the delivery room, fathers are normally not present during the birth of their own child – an attitude that needs to change, say the country’s first midwives, who are due to graduate next month. “Men need to be involved in the labour process if we are to reduce maternal mortality,” says Mala Reberio, one of the 20 midwives being trained to international standards in Bangladesh, which is still heavily reliant on community skilled birth attendants, who lack the skill and the authority to perform more complicated deliveries. Currently, one in 500 women in Bangladesh dies during childbirth. “If [men] could see firsthand the complications of childbirth, they would be more likely to send their pregnant wives to proper medical facilities and less likely to insist on early childbirth after marriage,” says Reberio. More than 75% of deliveries take place at home, and the average age of women having their first child is just 16 years, according to the UN. Fathers are not present during the delivery. The support role is usually taken on by the father’s mother or another senior female member of the family, said Dr Roushon Ara Begum from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the organisation leading the training. However, recent figures show that attitudes towards childbirth are changing. According to the government’s Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Healthcare Survey 2010 , women are increasingly choosing to use professional medical facilities (mainly due to a growth in private practices). The proportion of women giving birth in medical facilities has more than doubled, from 9% in 2001 to 23% last year – a trend that is likely to continue as fertility rates decrease, incomes increase and education levels improve. “I would recommend to everyone to give birth in a hospital for comfort and safety,” says Samia Zakia Sultana, 20, who is expecting her first child in a few weeks. Bangladesh is on target to meet MDG5 – reducing maternal mortality. According to the BMMS 2010, the maternal mortality ratio in Bangladesh has declined from 322 per 100,000 in 2001 to 194 in 2010. However, data collection in this area is notoriously difficult and there tends to be a large margin of error and much disagreement about the exact figures. Other reports from 2010 place Bangladesh as the worst in south Asia for maternal mortality.
Continue reading …It’s a weird and uncomfortable feeling for a journalist when a musician you have interviewed has died When news of Smiley Culture’s death during a police raid broke on Tuesday, I was as shocked as anybody. He’d only had two hits in the 80s, but his singles Police Officer and Cockney Translation pioneered a cheeky, narrative street style that reverberates through pop today. They were great, great singles and the manner of his death was shocking. But something else troubled me about his passing. Just months ago, I’d been speaking to Smiley on the phone . For a journalist, it’s a weird and uncomfortable feeling when someone you’ve interviewed has died. On the one hand, an interview is a short, transient, sometimes even formal process. I must have had Smiley on the phone for all of 20 minutes. But sometimes, even in short encounters like that one, artists tell you things about themselves and open up emotionally. When they subsequently die, especially in such shocking circumstances as Smiley, it’s hard not to feel a personal connection, even grief. The one that really got me was World of Twist’s singer Tony Ogden, who passed away in 2006 and whose music and death affected me so much I felt compelled to go to his funeral. Although they never made it big, the Manchester band played one of the best gigs I saw in the 1990s, at Leeds Warehouse. Sons of the Stage (currently being played live by Beady Eye) is one of my favourite singles of all time , and only months before his death Ogden had been reminiscing on the phone . He sent me a CD of his new music and I promised to give him an opinion, but somehow lost his number. He left me messages – always beginning, “Dave, it’s Tony O,” – but never left a return number. I tried to get a message to him through his old record company, to no avail. When he died, my girlfriend found me in floods of tears. The death of someone I never even met had affected me terribly. I felt I’d let him down. It’s no easier when you’ve met them personally. In 1994, I interviewed Jeff Buckley for what must have been hours. There was a different connection to normal because we’d both lost fathers when we were very young, and, as a new artist, he’d never been interviewed about this before and opened up for ages. I saw him a few times after that and while it would be an exaggeration to say we were friends, I still remember how he ruffled my hair in affection before a gig in Dublin. He’s been dead for 14 years – after plunging into the Mississippi river – but barely a week passes in which I don’t think about him in some way. When stars you’ve interviewed die, the chances are they haven’t passed away happily at the end of a long life with a pint of beer in their hand. They have probably died young, often in shocking circumstances. I remember Lush’s drummer Chris Acland as a cheery, easy-going guy who could talk for hours about punk rock, which doesn’t square at all with his 1996 suicide. Similarly, the Michael Hutchence I spent a memorable night drinking with in 1994 just doesn’t square with the troubled character who, just three years later, would die a strange and lonely death. I suppose this tells me that whatever people tell a journalist about their deepest feelings and however much you think you’ve bonded, you never really know them, and it’s naive to feel you do. Meanwhile, their music and articles about them continue to keep them in your memory. When I spoke to a chatty and amusing Smiley Culture last summer, I never expected to be penning his obituary this year. It feels like a bad dream you suddenly expect to wake up from. I’d love to be able to pick up the phone again and ask: “Smiley, you came across like a really happy-go-lucky guy. This week, what the hell happened?” Reggae Jeff Buckley Celebrity Dave Simpson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Markets that trade carbon pollution permits are meant to cut emissions. So why did the carbon dioxide vented in 2010 under Europe’s scheme go up? An update on the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme and just how loose the cap on emissions is now, following the economic crash … The latest analysis from Bloomberg New Energy Finance shows that last year, carbon emissions from the energy, steel, concrete and manufacturing facilities in the ETS rose by an estimated 1.8%. Yes, rose, not fell. I think carbon trading schemes are necessary as part of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit climate change. But to work, the cap on emissions has to be tight enough. The reason emissions rose in 2010 compared with 2009 was that emissions had fallen hard from 2008-2009 (11%) and 2007-2008 (5%). So there was room last year for emissions to grow, as the economy recovered a little, without hitting the cap. As it stands, Sandbag ‘s Damien Morris tells me that no country in the EU will have to cut its carbon until at least 2015. Sandbag’s analysis shows that the entire 2008-2012 ETS period (phase two) is likely result in no carbon being cut, at all. On the contrary, some spare pollution permits will probably be carried over into the next phase. I agree with the UK’s energy secretary, Chris Huhne, that Europe has to increase its ambition, to a continent-wide 30% . Some may argue that allowing businesses to make use of the looseness of the carbon cap as they recover from the recession makes perfect sense. But that is only the case if you believe that high-carbon businesses have a long-term future. If you think a low-carbon future is inevitable, then banking the carbon cuts caused by the recession and thereby redirecting investment to develop sustainable activities, such as renewable energy, is the only sane choice. If not, I’m sure China will be very happy to sell us the technology when we realise we need it, rather than vice versa. Footnote: If you want to post comments below like “the ETS is corrupt and broken – time to cash in”, or “quick, fill your boots before they close down this scam!”, then feel free. The ETS has been appallingly badly run . But for the sake of clarity, do please say whether you think carbon emissions need to be reduced at all. If you do, please say what your alternative to the ETS is. I am away for much of tomorrow, but will dive into the comments later. Carbon emissions Carbon offsetting European Union Damian Carrington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …When a TechCrunch writer posted ‘snarky’ remarks about Source Code’s marketing, the studio wasn’t impressed. So what? Reader, prepare yourself: Someone on the internet thinks Source Code looks silly. Source Code, of course, is a movie that premiered at South by Southwest last weekend, and which stars Jake Gyllenhaal as a man who must relive a train wreck over and over again, in the hope of changing its outcome. The last time you saw this movie, it was a comedy called Groundhog Day, and it starred Bill Murray and a remarkably unrealistic groundhog puppet who could drive a car. This time, however, the time loop is achieved with futuristic technology rather than mystical rodent curses, and as far as the Summit Entertainment studio is concerned, jokes should not be allowed anywhere near it. Consider Alexia Tsotis, a TechCrunch blogger called upon to cover the movie’s premiere. Her piece focused on the movie’s marketing, described as a “cross-platform, trans-media campaign” involving “social media game play”. This amounts to asking people to promote the movie on Facebook; Tsotis noted that, and joked about it, calling the above-quoted hype a “buzzwordgasm”. At which point, the trans-media cross-platform marketers at Summit found a whole new use for the internet: contacting AOL, the company that owns TechCrunch, to suggest that Tsotis change her piece. The email from MovieFone – the AOL-run film blog that Summit contacted – is apologetic. “Wanted to raise a concern that Summit had about the piece,” it says. “They felt it was a little snarky and wondered if any of the snark can be toned down?” It concludes on a similarly uncomfortable note: “If you have good reasons not to change anything that’s fine, I just need to get back to Summit.” One pities the sender. Especially since Tsotis published the email after receiving it. MovieFone defends its actions , but it had every reason to know it was doing something wrong. It wasn’t Summit’s place to demand changes; nor was it MovieFone’s place to imply that TechCrunch needed “good reasons” not to make them. The “good reason” they had to keep the piece intact was simple: Tsotis was paid to write a blog post, not to write ad copy for Summit. And she definitely wasn’t answerable to Summit’s concerns about, of all things, her sense of humour. Summit is not alone in its concerns. Most criticisms of internet writing centre on its tone. It is undeniably true that “snark” – the single most irritating new word of the past 20 years, given that it means “sarcasm”, which we already have a word for – does predominate, in some circles. It’s an easy way to convey that your target might be silly or inconsequential. It can be cruel; it’s undeniably unpleasant to work hard on something and to have it dismissed with a nasty joke. But one suspects that Summit’s response is less about hurt feelings than about the fact that negative coverage might affect its bottom line. Which somewhat relieves one’s sentimental concerns. And it’s also true that bloggers are frequently called upon to cover extremely silly and inconsequential things. To discuss the bold new marketing innovation of “making people talk about a movie on Facebook” with a straight face, especially when that movie is a Groundhog Day remake with slightly more train explosions, is a bit too much to ask for. Without at least some acknowledgment of the ridiculousness at hand, the writer risks turning in an article that is little more than a press release. Without snark, Tsotis’s piece wouldn’t be cruel. It would be something even worse: boring. SXSWi Blogging SXSW Festivals Digital media Internet United States Sady Doyle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …