Police announce they have arrested a man and have him in custody after appealing for sightings of taxi A man has been arrested on suspicion of kidnapping Sian O’Callaghan, who disappeared after leaving a nightclub in Swindon on Saturday. Area commander Chief Superintendent Steve Hedley announced the news after police searching for the woman appealed for sightings of a taxi. “A short time ago a man was arrested on suspicion of the kidnap of Sian O’Callaghan and is on route to a police custody centre. Sian’s family have been informed,” he said. “Further information will be released in due course but it is not appropriate for me to make any further comment at this time.” The taxi, a green Toyota Avensis estate, was seen between Swindon and the Savernake forest near Marlborough, Wiltshire, shortly after O’Callaghan was last seen early on Saturday morning. Detective Superintendent Steve Fulcher, who is leading the inquiry, said: “I am urgently appealing for any witness sightings of a green Toyota Avensis estate with taxi markings seen between 3am-4am and 12pm-9pm on Saturday 19 March 2011 between Swindon and Savernake.” Police issued a further appeal over items they believe were in O’Callaghan’s handbag. A spokeswoman said: “Her handbag is described as a large dark-coloured bag with a beige flower on the side. “In her handbag she is likely to have had items very similar to the following: a distinctively patterned front door key; a black car key with yellow insulation tape; a Tesco Clubcard key fob; a plastic yellow Kinder egg casing containing a small animal with a furry belly; and lip gloss. “Sian is also believed to have been wearing or have with her a DKNY watch with fake diamonds.” Police released images of examples of some of the items. Hundreds of members of the public had been helping police search the forest but are now being asked to stay away. Specialist dog teams have been called in. Fulcher said: “We have made good progress in narrowing the search using a number of technologies and techniques and I believe we are getting very close to identifying Sian’s whereabouts. “While I still want anyone with information to contact police I am not asking for any more public assistance with searches at this time.” O’Callaghan’s family thanked the public for their help in the search for “our beautiful girl”. In a statement released by police they said: “We have been so touched by the support shown by the community that we wanted to express our thanks. “The sheer numbers of people who have given up their time to help search for Sian and distribute appeal posters are overwhelming and we couldn’t ask for better support from the public, police and media.” A reward of £40,000 has been offered for information leading to the discovery of O’Callaghan. The family said they were grateful for the reward and hoped it might help to encourage someone to come forward with information. “This is an extremely difficult time for us and we continue to hope and pray that our beautiful girl is found soon.” O’Callaghan, an office administrator, disappeared after leaving Suju nightclub at about 2.50am to walk the half mile to the flat she shared with her boyfriend, Kevin Reape. Analysis of her mobile phone records suggests that about 30 minutes after she left the club, her phone was somewhere in the 1,800-hectare (4,500-acre) Savernake forest, near Marlborough. Chief Superintendent Steve Hedley, area commander for Swindon, said further analysis of the records had produced several “hot spots” that specialist search teams were examining. “We have got a better idea of where we could be searching,” he said. “That doesn’t mean we are going to find anything specific but we have got more of an idea from the technology where to look first.” Crime Police Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start – and no one seems to have noticed. On April 8, a group he’s funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros’s goal for such an event is to “establish new international rules” and “reform the currency system.” It’s all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for “ a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order .” The event is bringing together “more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought leaders” to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank and International Monetary Fund . Soros wants a new “multilateral system,” or an economic system where America isn’t so dominant. More than two-thirds of the slated speakers have direct ties to Soros. The billionaire who thinks “the main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat” is taking no chances. Thus far, this global gathering has generated less publicity than a spelling bee. And that’s with at least four journalists on the speakers list, including a managing editor for the Financial Times and editors for both Reuters and The Times. Given Soros’s warnings of what might happen without an agreement, this should be a big deal. But it’s not. What is a big deal is that Soros is doing exactly what he wanted to do. His 2009 commentary pushed for “a new Bretton Woods conference, like the one that established the post-WWII international financial architecture.” And he had already set the wheels in motion. Just a week before that op-ed was published, Soros had founded the New York City-based Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) , the group hosting the conference set at the Mount Washington Resort , the very same hotel that hosted the first gathering. The most recent INET conference was held at Central European University, in Budapest. CEU received $206 million from Soros in 2005 and has $880 million in its endowment now, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education . This, too, is a gathering of Soros supporters. INET is bringing together prominent people like former U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown , former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker and Soros, to produce “a lot of high-quality, breakthrough thinking.” While INET claims more than 200 will attend, only 79 speakers are listed on its site – and it already looks like a Soros convention. Twenty-two are on Soros-funded INET’s board and three more are INET grantees. Nineteen are listed as contributors for another Soros operation – Project Syndicate , which calls itself “the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries” reaching “456 leading newspapers in 150 countries.” It’s financed by Soros’s Open Society Institute. That’s just the beginning. The speakers include: • Volcker who is chairman of President Obama ’s Economic Advisory Board. He wrote the forward for Soros’s best-known book, “The Alchemy of Finance” and praised Soros as “an enormously successful speculator” who wrote “with insight and passion” about the problems of globalization. • Economist Jeffrey Sachs, director of The Earth Institute and longtime recipient of Soros charity cash. Sachs received $50 million from Soros for the U.N. Millennium Project , which he also directs. Sachs is world-renown for his liberal economics. In 2009, for example, he complained about low U.S. taxes , saying the “U.S. will have to raise taxes in order to pay for new spending initiatives, especially in the areas of sustainable energy, climate change, education, and relief for the poor.” • Soros friend Joseph E. Stiglitz, a former senior vice president and chief economist for the World Bank and Nobel Prize winner in Economics. Stiglitz shares similar views to Soros and has criticized free-market economists whom he calls “ free market fundamentalists. ” Naturally, he’s on the INET board and is a contributor to Project Syndicate. • INET Executive Director Rob Johnson , a former managing director at Soros Fund Management, who is on the Board of Directors for the Soros-funded Economic Policy Institute. Johnson has complained that government intervention in the fiscal crisis hasn’t been enough and wanted “ restructuring ,” including asking “for letters of resignation from the top executives of all the major banks.” Have no doubt about it: This is a Soros event from top to bottom. Even Soros admits his ties to INET are a problem, saying , “there is a conflict there which I fully recognize.” He claims he stays out of operations. That’s impossible. The whole event is his operation. INET isn’t subtle about its aims for the conference. Johnson interviewed fellow INET board member Robert Skidelsky about “The Need for a New Bretton Woods” in a recent video. The introductory slide to the video is subtitled: “How currency issues and tension between the US and China are renewing calls for a global financial overhaul.” Skidelsky called for a new agreement and said in the video that the conflict between the United States and China was “at the center of any monetary deal that may be struck, that needs to be struck.” Soros described in the 2009 op-ed that U.S.-China conflict as “another stark choice between two fundamentally different forms of organization: international capitalism and state capitalism.” He concluded that “a new multilateral system based on sounder principles must be invented.” As he explained it in 2010, “ we need a global sheriff .” In the 2000 version of his book “Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism,” Soros wrote how the Bretton Woods institutions “failed spectacularly” during the economic crisis of the late 1990s. When he called for a new Bretton Woods in 2009, he wanted it to “reconstitute the International Monetary Fund,” and while he’s at it, restructure the United Nations , too, boosting China and other countries at our expense. “Reorganizing the world order will need to extend beyond the financial system and involve the United Nations, especially membership of the Security Council ,” he wrote. “That process needs to be initiated by the U.S., but China and other developing countries ought to participate as equals.” Soros emphasized that point, that this needs to be a global solution, making America one among many. “The rising powers must be present at the creation of this new system in order to ensure that they will be active supporters.” And that’s exactly the kind of event INET is delivering, with the event website emphasizing “today's reconstruction must engage the larger European Union, as well as the emerging economies of Eastern Europe, Latin America , and Asia.” China figures prominently, including a senior economist for the World Bank in Beijing, the director of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the chief adviser for the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the Director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations. This is all easy to do when you have the reach of George Soros who funds more than 1,200 organizations. Except, any one of those 1,200 would shout such an event from the highest mountain. Groups like MoveOn.org or the Center for American Progress didn’t make their names being quiet. The same holds true globally, where Soros has given more than $7 billion to Open Society Foundations – including many media-savvy organizations just a phone call away. Why hasn’t the Soros network spread the word? Especially since Soros warns, all this needs to happen because “the alternative is frightening.” The Bush-hating billionaire says America is scary “because a declining superpower losing both political and economic dominance but still preserving military supremacy is a dangerous mix.” He wrote that the U.S. “could lead a cooperative effort to involve both the developed and the developing world, thereby reestablishing American leadership in an acceptable form.” That’s what this conference is all about – changing the global economy and the United States to make them “acceptable” to George Soros. — Iris Somberg contributed to this commentary. Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture. His column appears each week on The Fox Forum. He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.
Continue reading …The much-heralded ‘hydrogen economy’ never appears to get out of first gear. Are our politicians failing us by not pushing harder for hydrogen-powered cars? Why don’t governments push for more use of hydrogen-powered vehicles? Ashraf Abdo, via Facebook We seem to have been talking about the “hydrogen economy” for well over a decade now, but, like so many other saviour technologies, its arrival never seems to get any closer. Yes, there have been the showcasing examples of the Honda FCX Clarity and the CUTE (Clean Urban Transport for Europe) bus trials in London. But without the infrastructure to produce and distribute hydrogen as a fuel, these vehicles are little more than curios. It is significant, too, that talk of hydrogen seems to have dampened down in the US. After President Bush announced in 2003 that hydrogen-powered cars would be at heart of how America weaned itself off oil, the Obama administration has pulled back from promoting the technology with energy secretary Steven Chu stating in 2009 that support for research programmes would be curtailed because the government was “moving away from funding vehicular hydrogen fuel cells to technologies with more immediate promise”. Are our governments making a mistake by not investing much further in hydrogen? Or are there too many problems with the technology to see it becoming a genuine rival to oil as a transportation fuel? This column is an experiment in crowd-sourcing a reader’s question, so please let us know your views and experiences below (as opposed to emailing them) and I will join in with some of my own thoughts and reactions as the debate progresses. I will also be inviting various interested parties to join the debate too. • Please send your own environment question to ask.leo.and.lucy@guardian.co.uk . Or, alternatively, message me on Twitter @LeoHickman Hydrogen power Energy Renewable energy Ethical and green living Motoring Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Leprosy has officially been eradicated in India, yet 130,000 new cases are diagnosed every year. Richard Cookson and Seyi Rhodes report on the plight of the patients shunned by society Narsappa was just 10 years old when he was told he had leprosy, but the news changed the course of his life forever. People in his Indian village immediately began to shun him and told his parents that he had to leave. He says his mother started grieving for him “as if I was already dead”. Shortly afterwards, his father took him to a hospital two hours away from home and left him there. No one ever came to visit him and Narsappa never went home again. Now 42, he now lives in a leprosy colony on the outskirts of Hyderabad and campaigns on behalf of people affected by the disease. “I lie awake at night thinking about how I was treated and how I can stop others from going through the same thing,” he says. India may have one of the fastest growing economies in the world, but 130,000 Indians are diagnosed with leprosy every year – more than every other country put together. It’s partly because the country’s population is so huge but also, campaigners say, because the Indian government and some international donors are neglecting the fight against the disease. Hundreds of thousands of Indians suffer from leprosy and its debilitating after-effects. Given the number of new cases, it may come as some surprise that India announced it had eliminated the leprosy in 2005. According to a target set by the World Health Organisation, countries can announce ‘elimination’ when there are fewer than one case for every 10,000 people. Since then, the government has channelled funding previously dedicated to leprosy back into the general health system. Leprosy charities say that donations have also fallen significantly and some projects have had to close. Leprosy attacks nerve endings, destroying the ability to feel pain and injury, which makes patients susceptible to ulcers and infections. Over time, these infections can lead to the loss of fingers, hands, toes and feet if they are not treated properly. It can also cause blindness, facial disfigurement, and the ‘clawing’ of hands and feet. Many also face lifelong rejection, stigma and discrimination. There’s a widespread fear that the disease is highly contagious. In reality, 95% of humans are naturally immune, which is why campaigners call it the world’s “least contagious communicable disease”. While doctors are still unsure exactly how leprosy is spread (it’s probably by airborne droplet infection such as coughing and sneezing), it is easily treated with highly effective drugs available for free under a collaboration between the WHO and the pharmaceutical company Novartis. Nevertheless, even those who have been cured and are no longer contagious are shunned by society and forced to live as outcasts. India has an estimated 1,000 leprosy colonies that are home to hundreds of thousands people living their lives in the disease’s long dark shadow. Conditions in the colonies vary enormously: even though Shantinagar, where Narsappa lived, has no running water or toilets, the residents at least have brick houses and electricity. Other colonies are not so lucky. A leaked copy obtained by Channel 4′s Unreported World of a recent unpublished government study of the number of new leprosy cases in India suggests that the official figures don’t show the true scale, and it may be much higher. This was the first time in six years health workers have carried out extensive surveys. In one Indian state, health workers found the number of people infected was five times the official estimate. Dr Premal Das, the senior surgeon at India’s busiest leprosy hospital, which is run by UK-based charity the Leprosy Mission, says: “We have no idea what is the leprosy situation at the moment because for the last 10 years no NGO has been doing any active case detection work.” But he adds that his hospital saw 3,000 new leprosy cases last year – a record high. His hospital provides a wide range of leprosy services, from wound-cleaning to surgery. Das himself carries out 500 reconstructive operations a year, mostly correcting deformities to hands and feet. One of his patients is 16-year-old Pooja, who comes from Baripur village in Uttar Pradesh and was diagnosed with the disease just a few months ago. It caused the fingers on her right hand to claw. Thirty years after Narsappa was driven out of his village, she tells a remarkably similar story about what happened when she found out she had the disease. Through her tears, she explains how her neighbours tried to drive her out of the village. They verbally abused her and her mother, and told her parents she had to go. But Pooja was lucky – her parents stuck by her and the surgery will correct the deformity in her hand. Dr Das says that because the disease has been officially ‘eradicated’, the hospital is struggling for funding. “Because they’ve said leprosy is no longer a public health problem in India we are struggling with budgets,” he says. “It’s very difficult to convince a donor that the funds are actually for leprosy because they don’t think leprosy is a problem.” • Unreported World: India’s Leprosy Heroes is broadcast on Friday 25 March at 7.30pm on Channel 4. It can also be watched at channel4.com Health & wellbeing India Health guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The physicist and presenter of the BBC’s Wonders of the Universe will be answering your questions, 1-2pm Thursday The final instalment of BBC Two’s visually spectacular and spectacularly popular Wonders of the Universe airs on Sunday. Six million people watched the opening episode and it was the first BBC factual show to top the iTunes chart. There have been grumbles, however – about dumbing down, deafening music and an excessive use of soaring scenic shots – which the presenter, Brian Cox, addresses in an interview in Thursday’s G2: “I may have been standing on a mountaintop, but what I was saying was about electro-weak symmetry breaking. Some people can’t see the content for the style.” Nobody would dispute his passion for science and his belief in the importance of passing some of that enthusiasm on to the next generation of young scientists. “Britain is squandering its lead in science and engineering,” he says. “We once led the world, and we can again.” When he’s not presenting television documentaries, Cox works on the Atlas experiment at the Large Hadron Collider . He is a member of the particle physics group at the University of Manchester and a Royal Society University Research Fellow. The professor will be answering your questions about astronomy, particle physics and the Wonders of the Universe between 1 and 2pm on Thursday. Brian Cox Astronomy Particle physics Physics Cern Physics Television guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …News that top firms are to recruit students from less traditional universities has not been welcomed by all Corporate lawyers are up in arms about a shift in the profession’s graduate recruitment strategy that could see them forced to mix with “riffraff”. “I did not study at Oxford and the LSE to end up working with people who graduated from Leicester or Queen Mary,” wrote one person on legalweek.com in response to the news last week that magic circle outfit Freshfields is extending the number of universities from which it recruits. Others suggested that students from the less traditional universities were “dirty” and “substandard”, and that recruiting them was a pointless concession to political correctness. Freshfields’ announcement – which sees the solicitors to the Bank of England up the amount of institutions it targets to 28, including ex-poly Essex University – follows rival firm Allen & Overy’s (A&O) recent doubling of the number of universities it recruits to 40. The institutions include the University of East London (ranked 68th in The Times list of top law schools), City (ranked 57th in The Times list) and Greenwich (ranked 51st). A&O graduate recruitment manager Caroline Lindner says the idea that the profession is only interested in one type of person is “outdated”. She adds: “Our clients come from a range of backgrounds so it makes sense for our business to reflect that.” To facilitate this change in strategy the firm has said that it is prepared to be “flexible” with its traditional minimum A-level entry requirement of AAB, pledging to consider all applications, even if they fall short of that standard. However, the expectation is that those with lower A-levels grades will need to make up for it with strong degree performances. Another firm to have cast its net wider is Pinsent Masons, taking the total of major law firms to have broadened their recruitment pools since September to seven. During the last recruitment round Pinsents began targeting graduates from Napier (67th) and Aston (not ranked). The firm’s graduate recruitment manager, Edward Walker, puts the trend down to the impending tuition fee hike, which he thinks will see students increasingly select universities close to home so they can save money by living with their parents. “It’s not going to be a simple case of the best students going to the best universities anymore,” he says, adding that this will lower the incentive for graduate recruitment teams to travel far and wide to bring in the best new talent. Walker continues: “It’s going to make greater sense to focus more on the universities closer to the firm.” All this represents quite a change in mindset for the leading law firms, where Oxbridge graduates make up 38% of trainees , with just 12% having studied at universities outside the top 20. It’s a phenomenon partly explained by recent research from Dr Louise Ashley of Cass’s Centre for Professional Service Firms, which found law firms turned down candidates who looked or sounded working-class in order to preserve their upmarket brand. One City solicitor told Ashley: “There was one guy who came to interviews who was a real Essex barrow boy, and he had a very good CV, he was a clever chap, but we just felt that there’s no way we could employ him. I just thought, putting him in front of a client – you just couldn’t do it.” But there’s a growing sense that the legal profession – which is notorious for lagging other walks of life in reflecting the public mood – is casting aside some of these prejudices. This is illustrated by initiatives such as Addleshaw Goddard’s monitoring of its graduates’ socio-economic backgrounds, and the Bar Council’s new career website, become-a-barrister.com , set up to get the message across that students of “all backgrounds and ethnicities” can become barristers (although in doing so it glosses over some alarming statistics about how few trainee jobs there are at the bar). Certainly there are many lawyers in favour of broadening access, particularly among the older generation who joined the profession in an era when entry requirements were far less stringent. A senior partner at a large law firm told me recently that he thought recruitment based purely on academic merit had gone too far, advocating instead a return to the old system of hiring “five brainboxes, five wild cards, five solid all-rounders who were good at sport (for the firm’s cricket and rugby teams) and five stunningly beautiful women”. He added that one of the main reasons his firm stuck to the top universities was the students themselves: “They’re the biggest snobs of all. If we recruit too widely they won’t come to us.” Somewhere between these extremes may lay a happy medium. Alex Aldridge is a freelance journalist who writes about law and education Law Barristers Solicitors Students Higher education Alex Aldridge guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Channel 5 owner would consider selling Daily Express, Star or magazines, according to sources – but only for the right price Richard Desmond is willing to entertain offers for the Daily Express, Daily Star or his magazines – but would only be prepared to consider selling for the right price. Last week it emerged that Barclays Capital had approached Desmond asking if he was willing to see if was willing to sell OK! or any of his other magazines – an approach insiders described as a “fishing expedition”. However, BarCap was not simply dismissed – and instead the bank was given the indication that if Desmond would at least listen to any bidders for any part of his printed stable. One friend said “I told him that he wouldn’t have even entertained selling any of the newspapers or magazines a year ago”, but added that, since the £103.5m acquisition of Channel 5 last year, Desmond’s priorities have changed. Desmond is now closely involved in decisions relating to Channel 5, and has long been particularly attached to OK! magazine. Meanwhile sales of both the Express and Star titles are falling – reflecting the downward trend in the sector – even though both have been price promoted heavily. But with News Corp’s takeover of Sky close to sealing regulatory approval, a sale of the Express and Star titles to an existing newspaper owner may be easier to achieve. Any consolidation play would attract a premium bid. Nevertheless, it remains unlikely that Desmond will sell out, not least because his media empire remains profitable with little or no borrowings, and he has no need of money. Prior to the Channel 5 acquisition Desmond had net cash of £41.7m at his wholly owned Northern & Shell network according to the latest set of accounts available. Profits at Desmond’s publishing and printing activities were £11.4m in 2009, down sharply from £30.8m the year before, largely due to the £52m cost of promotional price-cutting at its titles. Richard Desmond bought the Express and Star titles for £125m from Lord Hollick’s United News & Media in 2000, with the aid of a £97m loan. Aggressive cost cutting meant that Desmond has been able to rapidly pay off the debt and generate healthy profits from the tabloids in the years since. Barclays Capital declined to comment. •
Continue reading …• Sussex captain to fly home immediately • ‘I felt that it was the only sensible option for me’ Michael Yardy has been withdrawn from England’s World Cup squad suffering from depression and has returned home ahead of England’s quarter final match against Sri Lanka in Colombo. Yardy was days away from one of the biggest matches of his life, but after consultation with England’s medical staff he has returned home immediately to receive specialist advice as he seeks to overcome an illness that an England Wales Cricket Board statement said he “has been managing for a prolonged period of time.” A statement from Yardy, the Sussex captain, said: “Leaving at this stage of a World Cup campaign was a very difficult decision to make but I felt that it was the only sensible option for me and I wanted to be honest about the reason behind that decision. “I would like to wish the squad all the very best ahead of the game on Saturday. I would appreciate some privacy over the coming weeks while I spend time with family and close friends ahead of what I hope will be a successful season for Sussex.” Hugh Morris, managing director of England cricket, said: “I would like to offer my full support to Michael on behalf of everyone involved with the England team and the ECB. He has been an integral part of the England set up in recent years and while he will be missed in the knockout stages of the World Cup, our priority now is to ensure that he returns home to his family and is able to spend time recovering with a strong support network around him. ” The ECB has applied to the ICC’s Technical committee to replace Yardy in its CWC squad and is awaiting a decision. He is the fourth player to pull out of England’s World Cup squad in a matter of weeks, following Kevin Pietersen, Stuart Broad and Ajmal Shahzad, whose involvement was prematurely ended because of injury. Yorkshire’s all-rounder, Adil Rashid, overlooked for the entire winter, would be one of the players in contention along with Nottinghamshire’s Samit Patel. Yardy has had a troubled time on the field during the World Cup. He took only two wickets against India, Ireland and South Africa and he looked innocuous on Indian pitches, drawing attention to the fact that England utilise his slow left-arm as a defensive option in one-day cricket even though he is not a regular bowler at county level with Sussex. He was also a vital component of England’s Twenty20 World Cup win in the Caribbean earlier this year but, at 30, it is possible that his international career is now at an end and he will return to a less stressful career on the county circuit. This is not the first time an England player has suffered from a depressive illness. Marcus Trescothick retired from international cricket, failing in several England comeback attempts, because of clinical depression. He has continued to play county cricket and has captained Somerset without any relapse. Trescothick described in his award-winning autobiography the homesickness, sleeplessness and anxiety which forced him to fly home from Test series against India in February 2006 and from Australia later that year. “I would not have wished this illness on my worst enemy,” he said. Sussex were quick to offer support. Mark Robinson, their cricket manager, said: “Sussex are very proud of Michael Yardy and very supportive of his decision, not only to come home but also to be prepared to go public with the reasons. “He’s always been a person admired for his utmost honesty and integrity, and his courage in dealing with this issue emphasises that. As captain and one of our leading players, we’ll give him all the time and all the support necessary so that he can continue to lead this club forward.” Cricket World Cup 2011 Cricket David Hopps guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Sussex captain to fly home immediately • ‘I felt that it was the only sensible option for me’ Michael Yardy has been withdrawn from England’s World Cup squad suffering from depression and has returned home ahead of England’s quarter final match against Sri Lanka in Colombo. Yardy was days away from one of the biggest matches of his life, but after consultation with England’s medical staff he has returned home immediately to receive specialist advice as he seeks to overcome an illness that an England Wales Cricket Board statement said he “has been managing for a prolonged period of time.” A statement from Yardy, the Sussex captain, said: “Leaving at this stage of a World Cup campaign was a very difficult decision to make but I felt that it was the only sensible option for me and I wanted to be honest about the reason behind that decision. “I would like to wish the squad all the very best ahead of the game on Saturday. I would appreciate some privacy over the coming weeks while I spend time with family and close friends ahead of what I hope will be a successful season for Sussex.” Hugh Morris, managing director of England cricket, said: “I would like to offer my full support to Michael on behalf of everyone involved with the England team and the ECB. He has been an integral part of the England set up in recent years and while he will be missed in the knockout stages of the World Cup, our priority now is to ensure that he returns home to his family and is able to spend time recovering with a strong support network around him. ” The ECB has applied to the ICC’s Technical committee to replace Yardy in its CWC squad and is awaiting a decision. He is the fourth player to pull out of England’s World Cup squad in a matter of weeks, following Kevin Pietersen, Stuart Broad and Ajmal Shahzad, whose involvement was prematurely ended because of injury. Yorkshire’s all-rounder, Adil Rashid, overlooked for the entire winter, would be one of the players in contention along with Nottinghamshire’s Samit Patel. Yardy has had a troubled time on the field during the World Cup. He took only two wickets against India, Ireland and South Africa and he looked innocuous on Indian pitches, drawing attention to the fact that England utilise his slow left-arm as a defensive option in one-day cricket even though he is not a regular bowler at county level with Sussex. He was also a vital component of England’s Twenty20 World Cup win in the Caribbean earlier this year but, at 30, it is possible that his international career is now at an end and he will return to a less stressful career on the county circuit. This is not the first time an England player has suffered from a depressive illness. Marcus Trescothick retired from international cricket, failing in several England comeback attempts, because of clinical depression. He has continued to play county cricket and has captained Somerset without any relapse. Trescothick described in his award-winning autobiography the homesickness, sleeplessness and anxiety which forced him to fly home from Test series against India in February 2006 and from Australia later that year. “I would not have wished this illness on my worst enemy,” he said. Sussex were quick to offer support. Mark Robinson, their cricket manager, said: “Sussex are very proud of Michael Yardy and very supportive of his decision, not only to come home but also to be prepared to go public with the reasons. “He’s always been a person admired for his utmost honesty and integrity, and his courage in dealing with this issue emphasises that. As captain and one of our leading players, we’ll give him all the time and all the support necessary so that he can continue to lead this club forward.” Cricket World Cup 2011 Cricket David Hopps guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Hit F5 or tickle the autorefresh button for the latest updates • Email rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk with your thoughts • Buy the Guardian’s Ashes OBO book, why don’t you? 1st over: Australia 3-0 (Watson 1, Haddin 1) India will open the bowling with the offspinner Ravichandran Ashwin. He was impressive against the West Indies on Sunday, and his second ball is a nice doosra that Watson defends respectfully. There’s an interesting atmosphere – unusually hushed by Indian standards (still deafening by any other standards), a reflection of the insecurity surrounding both sides. Watson takes a single to leg and then the fourth ball turns so sharply as to be a leg-side wide. There is a sense that this pitch will turn a lot more from this end than the other, so expect all the spinners from this end. The tense start continues when Haddin drags an inside edge over midwicket for a single. You can smell the fear. “Thanks for your link to that yoga video, which has left me scarred for life,” says Chris Hotham. “From now on I will be resting in the safe haven of the blog page and will certainly not be clicking any links.” Something for a Thursday morning, from Bharath Rajagopalan “As the title says, this is a very scary video .” And I thought Napoleon Dynamite was a comedy, not a documentary. Australia have won the toss and will bat first. MS Dhoni says he would also have batted, and that’s a decent toss to win on a pitch that should lose a bit of life as the day progresses. There’s some surprising team news on both sides. India have omitted Yusuf Pathan, with Suresh Raina preferred at No7 and the fit again Virender Sehwag coming back into the side. That really is a shock. Australia have also strengthened their batting, with David Hussey replacing Steve Smith. That’s a reflection of the poor performance of the middle order on both sides thus far. India Sehwag, Tendulkar, Gambhir, Kohli, Yuvraj, Dhoni (c/wk), Raina, Harbhajan, Ashwin, Zaheer, Patel. Australia Watson, Haddin (wk), Ponting (c), Clarke, M Hussey, White, D Hussey, Johnson, Lee, Krejza, Tait. The last time India went out of their World Cup , in 1996, the fans rioted . Just saying. In other news, here’s some rare footage of Graham Gooch sweeping India to death in the semi-finals in 1987 – the other occasion on which India were eliminated as hosts. Whoever wins tonight will play Pakistan on Wednesday. If India get through, that will make today’s match seem like a jaunty little warm-up fixture. Preamble This is a quarter-final only in name. In nature, India v Australia is something much grander, especially when it is the hosts against the holders. It’s almost too big for a final, never mind a last-eight game, and that adds a significant frisson to today’s contest. There is a unique tension when two superpowers meet ahead of schedule. If the quarter-finals is par for the heavyweights in a football World Cup, then in rugby and cricket it’s the semi-finals. If you go out before that you are generally doomed to bathe in ignominy for the foreseeable future. Everyone and everything has an unspoken minimum requirement when it comes to performance. For some, it’s a triumph to simply get through the day without making a total fool of themselves, or without brushing their teeth with the Original Source Chocolate and Mint Shower Melt and smearing Colgate under their armpits; for some of us you, defiant mediocrity really is a victory. For others, and certainly for these two teams, the bar is a little higher. A quarter-final exit alone is enough to invite widespread criticism – but this time that will be exacerbated by both teams’ modest performances during the group stage. Whoever departs today will have beaten just one of the top eight sides, New Zealand in Australia’s case and West Indies in India’s. That’[s not good enough. Both sides have problems, and have been dangerously dependent on their openers and one high-class fast bowler (Brett Lee for Australia, Zaheer Khan for India). Today’s match might not be decided by who reaches the greater peaks, but who best avoids the troughs. Chuck in the compelling subplots, particularly Ricky Ponting fighting for his life and Sachin Tendulkar on 99 international centuries, and it’s clear that this game is – as Mark Nicholas once said – massive, massive . It’s almost too much to comprehend that one of these sides will be out of the tournament by this evening. But they will and, whoever it is, they probably shouldn’t read the papers tomorrow. * Chocolate shower gel? That’s a still-drunk-the-morning-after accident waiting to happen. What next. Deodorant-flavour beer? Ready salted crisps with a hint of Ralgex? Cricket World Cup 2011 India cricket team Australia cricket team Over by over reports Cricket Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …