Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 638)
Bozell Column: Obama’s Libyan War

Think of all the militant anti-war types who were thrilled at the removal of the Bush “war machine” in 2008, only to see President Obama’s strained endorsement of military action in Libya. Oh, how the political wave of the hard left has crashed ashore. It seems like only yesterday when they were celebrating Cindy Sheehan as she flagrantly called President Bush “the biggest terrorist in the world.” Then they elected Obama and it all went to Hell. Over the last two years, these chagrined radicals have watched in stunned disbelief while their hero Obama continued the Iraq war wrap-up on the generals’ timeline and then added more troops in Afghanistan. They listened in shock as Team Obama announced it was reversing itself on indefinite detentions at Guantanamo. And now he’s started his very own kinetic military action. Where are our friends in the press? They must be wondering. The media’s said nothing about Iraq for them, nothing about Afghanistan. Virtually nothing about the Gitmo flip-flop. And now they’re pro-war in Libya. Were these journalists ever “anti-war”? Or was all that coverage of George W. Bush as a Constitution-shredding global embarrassment just a convenient partisan campaign? If the No War for Oil crowd thought the run-up to war in Iraq featured a docile media, how on Earth must they feel about the docility of the press as Obama started dropping bombs on Libya? Someone pass the smelling salts. It’s pure and simple: The re-election of Barack Obama trumps all. The news media will bury anything negative that threatens his return in 2013. The media know full well that Obama’s refusal to obtain congressional approval is a flat-out betrayal, and a documentation of a lie. The media have the footage of Candidate Obama in 2007: “The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” The media also know (then-) presidential candidate Joe Biden said he’d personally lead the impeachment if Bush went to war with Iran without a congressional vote. Some in the print press found this, like Washington Post “fact checker” Glenn Kessler. But had this been Bush exercising such brazen dishonesty, it would have been the lead story on every TV network news program – for days. But it was Obama and Biden who lied through their teeth and nothing will interfere with Obama-Biden in 2012 . Like their Democrat friends, Harry “The War is Lost” Reid and Nancy “Iraq Was a Grotesque Mistake” Pelosi, our media were the loyal opposition in the Bush years. It is astonishing to see them so shamefully switch their talking points so quickly and robotically – perhaps as quickly and robotically as General Obama. Exhibit A is former Washington Post defense reporter Thomas Ricks. Five years ago, he wrote an Iraq book with the title “Fiasco.” That tome was touted as “a searing judgment on the strategic blindness” of Bush’s war. In his book, Ricks even trashed Democrats. They were not doves but “lambs” for their failure to oversee the excesses of the executive branch. So who is this lobotomized Tom Ricks who showed up on “Meet the Press” on March 27? This man put on rose-colored glasses and magically transformed himself into Mr. Best-Case Scenario. NBC’s David Gregory asked: If Gaddafi stays, can we really say “Mission accomplished”? Ricks didn’t hesitate. “Yes. I think what they'll say is we gave it a chance. All Obama is saying is give war a chance,” Ricks proclaimed. “Not our war. All we did was kick the door down, let the Brits and the French and the others do it. And I think his notion is we're going to be out of there long before this is resolved. That's the hope. That's the best-case scenario.” As one of Obama’s media “lambs,” Ricks also insisted that if there are Islamic extremists among the Libyan rebels, that’s okay, since they seem to like us right now. “I don't think that all Islamic extremists are necessarily our enemy.

Continue reading …
Frontline policing ‘will be damaged’

About two-thirds of police have contact with the public but will be difficult to retain in the face of 20% cuts, says HMIC About two-thirds of the police workforce in England and Wales should be classed as involved in the “frontline” and will be very hard to retain in the face of 20% cuts, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) warns. In the first official attempt to define what constitutes the frontline in policing, the HMIC study says that 68% of police officers and civilian staff are involved either in everyday “visible” contact with the public or in specialist roles intervening directly to keep people safe and enforce the law. The study suggests that CID, confiscating criminal assets, fingerprint and scenes of crime jobs are all frontline functions while handling intelligence, processing offenders, training, IT and communications could all be regarded as middle-office and back-office roles. Sir Denis O’Connor, the chief inspector of constabulary, stressed that staff in middle or back office jobs were also key and ensured frontline duties were properly carried out. “Quite a lot of functions in there. We can’t see that any of them are particularly redundant. You need them all in some form,” he said. O’Connor said that while back-office staff were not just disposable assets and some roles did not have to be done by officers, there were areas that were off-limits: “I would want police officers involved in training detectives and people driving cars. There is an element of expertise. Learning how to interrogate people well is not something you can learn from a book,” he said. HMIC says in its report, Demanding Times, that it will be a big challenge to make cuts without damaging the frontline. “Even if you imagine that the back office and middle office are ripe for reform, you have only got one third of them to do it with,” said O’Connor, implying the rest were off-limits as frontline roles. “The cuts across England and Wales do not cut the same way for every force. For some it is a much bigger challenge. It remains difficult for the frontline to remain in its current form for a number of forces. In its present form it looks very hard to retain.” The study was undertaken after ministers and MPs failed to find any consensus within the police over what constitutes the frontline. Peter Fahy of the Association of Chief Police Officers said the HMIC report highlighted the close link between what was seen as frontline and those working out of sight: “Whether it be handling intelligence, delivering training, processing offenders through the criminal justice system or any other task, roles in support of the frontline are as critical to policing as they are in any other large organisation. Simplistic judgments about the value of the work our officers and staff do are not helpful.” The report is published after a Labour survey showed that 2,200 of the most experienced officers are to be forcibly retired over the next four years and it was disclosed that Warwickshire police have become the first in the country to tell uniformed officers they will be drafted into back-office roles to cover civilian staff who have taken redundancy. Police Public sector cuts Alan Travis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Pakistan’s secret dirty war

In Balochistan, mutilated corpses bearing the signs of torture keep turning up, among them lawyers, students and farm workers. Why is no one investigating and what have they got to do with the bloody battle for Pakistan’s largest province? The bodies surface quietly, like corks bobbing up in the dark. They come in twos and threes, a few times a week, dumped on desolate mountains or empty city roads, bearing the scars of great cruelty. Arms and legs are snapped; faces are bruised and swollen. Flesh is sliced with knives or punctured with drills; genitals are singed with electric prods. In some cases the bodies are unrecognisable, sprinkled with lime or chewed by wild animals. All have a gunshot wound in the head. This gruesome parade of corpses has been surfacing in Balochistan , Pakistan’s largest province, since last July. Several human rights groups, including Amnesty International, have accounted for more than 100 bodies – lawyers, students, taxi drivers, farm workers. Most have been tortured. The last three were discovered on Sunday. If you have not heard of this epic killing spree, though, don’t worry: neither have most Pakistanis. Newspaper reports from Balochistan are buried quietly on the inside pages, cloaked in euphemisms or, quite often, not published at all. The forces of law and order also seem to be curiously indifferent to the plight of the dead men. Not a single person has been arrested or prosecuted; in fact, police investigators openly admit they are not even looking for anyone. The stunning lack of interest in Pakistan’s greatest murder mystery in decades becomes more understandable, however, when it emerges that the prime suspect is not some shady gang of sadistic serial killers, but the country’s powerful military and its unaccountable intelligence men. This is Pakistan’s dirty little war. While foreign attention is focused on the Taliban, a deadly secondary conflict is bubbling in Balochistan, a sprawling, mineral-rich province along the western borders with Afghanistan and Iran. On one side is a scrappy coalition of guerrillas fighting for independence from Pakistan; on the other is a powerful army that seeks to quash their insurgency with maximum prejudice. The revolt, which has been rumbling for more than six years, is spiced by foreign interests and intrigues – US spy bases, Chinese business, vast underground reserves of copper, oil and gold. And in recent months it has grown dramatically worse. At the airport in Quetta, the provincial capital, a brusque man in a cheap suit marches up to my taxi with a rattle of questions. “Who is this? What’s he doing here? Where is he staying?” he asks the driver, jerking a thumb towards me. Scribbling the answers, he waves us on. “Intelligence,” says the driver. The city itself is tense, ringed by jagged, snow-dusted hills and crowded with military checkposts manned by the Frontier Corps (FC), a paramilitary force in charge of security. Schools have recently raised their walls; sand-filled Hesco barricades , like the ones used in Kabul and Baghdad, surround the FC headquarters. In a restaurant the waiter apologises: tandoori meat is off the menu because the nationalists blew up the city’s gas pipeline a day earlier. The gas company had plugged the hole that morning, he explains, but then the rebels blew it up again. The home secretary, Akbar Hussain Durrani, a neatly suited, well-spoken man, sits in a dark and chilly office. Pens, staplers and telephones are neatly laid on the wide desk before him, but his computer is blank. The rebels have blown up a main pylon, he explains, so the power is off. Still, he insists, things are fine. “The government agencies are operating in concert, everyone is acting in the best public interest,” he says. “This is just a . . . political problem.” As we speak, a smiling young man walks in and starts to take my photo; I later learn he works for the military’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) spy agency. We cut across the city, twisting through the backstreets, my guide glancing nervously out the rear window. The car halts before a tall gate that snaps shut behind us. Inside, a 55-year-old woman named Lal Bibi is waiting, wrapped in a shawl that betrays only her eyes, trembling as she holds forth a picture of her dead son Najibullah. The 20-year-old, who ran a shop selling motorbike parts, went missing last April after being arrested at an FC checkpost, she says. His body turned up three months later, dumped in a public park on the edge of Quetta, badly tortured. “He had just two teeth in his mouth,” she says in a voice crackling with pain. She turns to her father, a turbaned old man sitting beside her, and leans into his shoulder. He grimaces. Bibi says her family was probably targeted for its nationalist ties – Najibullah’s older brother, now dead, had joined the “men in the mountains” years earlier, she says. Now a nephew, 28-year-old Maqbool, is missing. She prays for him, regularly calling the hospitals for any sign of him and, occasionally, the city morgues. Over a week of interviews in Karachi and Quetta, I meet the relatives of seven dead men and nine “disappeared” – men presumed to have been abducted by the security forces . One man produces a mobile phone picture of the body of his 22-year-old cousin, Mumtaz Ali Kurd, his eyes black with swelling and his shirt drenched in blood. A relative of Zaman Khan, one of three lawyers killed in the past nine months, produces court papers. A third trembles as he describes finding his brother’s body in an orchard near Quetta. Patterns emerge. The victims were generally men between 20 and 40 years old – nationalist politicians, students, shopkeepers, labourers. In many cases they were abducted in broad daylight – dragged off buses, marched out of shops, detained at FC checkposts – by a combination of uniformed soldiers and plain-clothes intelligence men. Others just vanished. They re-emerge, dead, with an eerie tempo – approximately 15 bodies every month, although the average was disturbed last Saturday when eight bodies were found in three locations across Balochistan. Activists have little doubt who is behind the atrocities. Human Rights Watch says “indisputable” evidence points to the hand of the FC, the ISI and its sister agency, Military Intelligence. A local group, Voice for Missing Persons, says the body count has surpassed 110. “This is becoming a state of terror,” says its chairman, Naseerullah Baloch. The army denies the charges, saying its good name is being blemished by impersonators. “Militants are using FC uniforms to kidnap people and malign our good name,” says Major General Obaid Ullah Khan Niazi, commander of the 46,000 FC troops stationed in Balochistan. “Our job is to enforce the law, not to break it.” Despairing relatives feel cornered. Abdul Rahim, a farmer wearing a jewelled skullcap, is from Khuzdar, a hotbed of insurgent violence. He produces court papers detailing the abduction of his son Saadullah in 2009. First he went to the courts but then his lawyer was shot dead. Then he went to the media but the local press club president was killed. Now, Rahim says, “nobody will help in case they are targeted too. We are hopeless.” Balochistan has long been an edgy place. Its vast, empty deserts and long borders are a magnet for provocateurs of every stripe. Taliban fighters slip back and forth along the 800-mile Afghan border; Iranian dissidents hide inside the 570-mile frontier with Iran. Drug criminals cross the border from Helmand, the world’s largest source of heroin, on their way to Iran or lonely beaches on the Arabian Sea. Wealthy Arab sheikhs fly into remote airstrips on hunting expeditions for the houbara bustard, a bird they believe improves their lovemaking. At Shamsi, a secretive airbase in a remote valley in the centre of the province, CIA operatives launch drones that attack Islamists in the tribal belt. The US spies appreciate the lack of neighbours – Balochistan covers 44% of Pakistan yet has half the population of Karachi. The province’s other big draw is its natural wealth. At Reko Diq, 70 miles from the Afghan border, a Canadian-Chilean mining consortium has struck gold, big-time. The Tethyan company has discovered 4bn tonnes of mineable ore that will produce an estimated 200,000 tonnes of copper and 250,000 ounces of gold per year, making it one of the largest such mines in the world. The project is currently stalled by a tangled legal dispute, but offers a tantalising taste of Balochistan’s vast mineral riches, which also includes oil, gas, platinum and coal. So far it is largely untapped, though, and what mining exists is scrappy and dangerous. On 21 March, 50 coal workers perished in horrific circumstances when methane gas flooded their mine near Quetta, then catastrophically exploded. Two conflicts are rocking the province. North of Quetta, in a belt of land adjoining the Afghan border, is the ethnic Pashtun belt. Here, Afghan Taliban insurgents shelter in hardline madrasas and lawless refugee camps, taking rest in between bouts of battle with western soldiers in Afghanistan. It is home to the infamous “Quetta shura”, the Taliban war council, and western officials say the ISI is assisting them. Some locals agree. “It’s an open secret,” an elder from Kuchlak tells me. “The ISI gave a fleet of motorbikes to local elders, who distributed them to the fighters crossing the border. Nobody can stop them.” The other conflict is unfolding south of Quetta, in a vast sweep that stretches from the Quetta suburbs to the Arabian Sea, in the ethnic Baloch and Brahui area, whose people have always been reluctant Pakistanis. The first Baloch revolt erupted in 1948, barely six months after Pakistan was born; this is the fifth. The rebels are splintered into several factions, the largest of which is the Balochistan Liberation Army. They use classic guerrilla tactics – ambushing military convoys, bombing gas pipelines, occasionally lobbing rockets into Quetta city. Casualties are relatively low: 152 FC soldiers died between 2007 and 2010, according to official figures, compared with more than 8,000 soldiers and rebels in the 1970s conflagration. But this insurgency seems to have spread deeper into Baloch society than ever before. Anti-Pakistani fervour has gripped the province. Baloch schoolchildren refuse to sing the national anthem or fly its flag; women, traditionally secluded, have joined the struggle. Universities have become hotbeds of nationalist sentiment. “This is not just the usual suspects,” says Rashed Rahman, editor of the Daily Times , one of few papers that regularly covers the conflict. At a Quetta safehouse I meet Asad Baloch, a wiry, talkative 22-year-old activist with the Baloch Students’ Organisation (Azad). “We provide moral and political support to the fighters,” he says. “We are making people aware. When they are aware, they act.” It is a risky business: about one-third of all “kill and dump” victims were members of the BSO. Baloch anger is rooted in poverty. Despite its vast natural wealth, Balochistan is desperately poor – barely 25% of the population is literate (the national average is 47%), around 30% are unemployed and just 7% have access to tap water. And while Balochistan provides one-third of Pakistan’s natural gas, only a handful of towns are hooked up to the supply grid. The insurgents are demanding immediate control of the natural resources and, ultimately, independence. “We are not part of Pakistan,” says Baloch. His phone rings. News comes through that another two bodies have been discovered near the coast. One, Abdul Qayuum, was a BSO activist. Days later, videos posted on YouTube show an angry crowd carrying his bloodied corpse into a mortuary. He had been shot in the head. The FC commander, Maj Gen Niazi, wearing a sharp, dark suit and with neatly combed hair (he has just come from a conference) says he has little time for the rebel demand. “The Baloch are being manipulated by their leaders,” he says, noting that the scions of the main nationalist groups live in exile abroad – Hyrbyair Marri in London; Brahamdagh Bugti in Geneva. “They are enjoying the life in Europe while their people suffer in the mountains,” he says with a sigh. Worse again, he adds, they were supported by India. The Punjabi general offers no proof for his claim, but US and British intelligence broadly agree, according to the recent WikiLeaks cables. India sees Balochistan as payback for Pakistani meddling in Kashmir – which explains why Pakistani generals despise the nationalists so much. “Paid killers,” says Niazi. He vehemently denies involvement in human rights violations. “To us, each and every citizen of Balochistan is equally dear,” he says. Civilian officials in the province, however, have another story. Last November, the provincial chief minister, Aslam Raisani, told the BBC that the security forces were “definitely” guilty of some killings; earlier this month, the province’s top lawyer, Salahuddin Mengal, told the supreme court the FC was “lifting people at will”. He resigned a week later. However, gross human rights abuses are not limited to the army. As the conflict drags on, the insurgents have become increasingly brutal and ruthless. In the past two years, militants have kidnapped aid workers, killed at least four journalists and, most disturbingly, started to target “settlers” – unarmed civilians, mostly from neighbouring Punjab, many of whom have lived in Balochistan for decades. Some 113 settlers were killed in cold blood last year, according to government figures – civil servants, shopkeepers, miners. On 21 March, militants riding motorbikes sprayed gunfire into a camp of construction workers near Gwadar, killing 11; the Baloch Liberation Front claimed responsibility. Most grotesque, perhaps, are the attacks on education: 22 school teachers, university lecturers and education officials have been assassinated since January 2008, causing another 200 to flee their jobs. As attitudes harden, the middle ground is being swept away in tide of bloodshed. “Our politicians have been silenced,” says Habib Tahir, a human rights lawyer in Quetta. “They are afraid of the young.” I ask a student in Quetta to defend the killing of teachers. “They are not teachers, they work for the intelligence agencies,” one student tells me. “They are like thieves coming into our homes. They must go.” The Islamabad government seems helpless to halt Balochistan’s slide into chaos. Two years ago, President Asif Ali Zardari announced a sweeping package of measures intended to assuage Baloch grievances, including thousands of jobs, a ban on new military garrisons and payment of $1.4bn (£800m) in overdue natural gas royalties. But violence has hijacked politics, the plan is largely untouched, and anaemic press coverage means there is little outside pressure for action. Pakistan’s foreign allies, obsessed with hunting Islamists, have ignored the problem. “We are the most secular people in the region, and still we are being ignored,” says Noordin Mengal, who represents Balochistan on the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. In this information vacuum, the powerful do as they please. Lawyer Kachkol Ali witnessed security forces drag three men from his office in April 2009. Their bodies turned up five days later, dead and decomposed. After telling his story to the press, Ali was harassed by military intelligence, who warned him his life was in danger. He fled the country. “In Pakistan, there is only rule of the jungle,” he says by phone from Lørenskog, a small Norwegian town where he won asylum last summer. “Our security agencies pick people up and treat them like war criminals,” he says. “They don’t even respect the dead.” Balochistan’s dirty little war pales beside Pakistan’s larger problems – the Taliban, al-Qaida, political upheaval. But it highlights a very fundamental danger – the ability of Pakistanis to live together in a country that, under its Islamic cloak, is a patchwork of ethnicities and cultures. “Balochistan is a warning of the real battle for Pakistan, which is about power and resources,” says Haris Gazdar, a Karachi-based researcher. “And if we don’t get it right, we’re headed for a major conflict.” Before leaving Quetta I meet Faiza Mir, a 36-year-old lecturer in international relations at Quetta’s Balochistan University. Militants have murdered four of her colleagues in the past three years, all because they were “Punjabi”. Driving on to the campus, she points out the spots where they were killed, knowing she could be next. “I can’t leave,” says Mir, a sparky woman with an irrepressible smile. “This is my home too.” And so she engages in debate with students, sympathising with their concerns. “I try to make them understand that talk is better than war,” she says. But some compromises are impossible. Earlier on, students had asked Mir to remove a portrait of Muhammad Ali Jinnah , Pakistan’s founding father, from her office wall. Mir politely refused, and Jinnah – an austere lawyer in a Savile Row suit – still stares down from her wall. But how long will he stay there? “That’s difficult to say,” she answers. Pakistan Taliban Afghanistan Declan Walsh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
GOP Threatens U.S. Fiscal Suicide over Balanced Budget Amendment

enlarge Credit: Wall Street Journal ( Click here for larger image ) The national debt of the United States tripled under Ronald Reagan and doubled again under George W. Bush. Bush and the GOP Congress cut taxes during wartime , a first in modern American history. During his presidency, Republicans voted seven times to increase the debt ceiling. As Utah Senator Orrin Hatch in 2009 described Republican orthodoxy under Republican presidents, “It was standard practice not to pay for things.” But that was then and this is now. And now with a Democrat in the White House, Hatch and his Republican colleagues are demanding passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment as a condition of raising the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling. Whether that blackmail is paid or not, either way the result would be a catastrophe for the United States. The Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) gambit is just the latest chapter in the Republican saga of “America Held Hostage.” Earlier this month, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell warned that “not a single one of the 47 Republicans will vote to raise the debt ceiling unless it includes with it some credible effort to do something about our debt.” McConnell then upped the ante : Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell warned on Friday that GOP senators will not vote to increase the government’s borrowing limit unless President Barack Obama agrees to rein in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, laying down a high-stakes marker just weeks before the debt ceiling is reached. Now, as Human Events and Politico reported Friday, America’s Republican captors are threatening the shut down the government and undermine the full faith and credit of the United States if their demands for a “Starve the Beast” amendment are not met: The Senate Republicans are preparing to tell President Obama that they want a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the Constitution passed in Congress in exchange for raising the statuary debt ceiling above $14.2 trillion. “My hope is that we would force a vote on a Balanced Budget Amendment as a condition to voting on the debt ceiling,” Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) told HUMAN EVENTS. “By next week, or shortly thereafter, we will have all 47 Republicans unified behind the effort, and then begin to reach out to our Democratic colleagues.” A BBA would force the federal government to balance the federal spending to incoming revenue each year and cap spending at 18% of the gross domestic product (GDP). For the current Fiscal Year (FY 2011), the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that government spending will be $1.4 trillion more than revenue and account for almost 25% of the GDP. Of course, the GOP BBA is a recipe for disaster. If codified, Republican grandstanding on the budget would not only mean draconian cuts in government services. The fragile U.S. recovery would be stopped dead in its tracks. As a matter of simple math, balancing President Obama’s proposed FY 2012 budget would mean slashing $1.6 trillion from a $3.7 trillion spending request. That inevitably would devastate federal programs across the board. As this now-dated diagram of the 2011 budget below illustrates, you simply can’t get there from here without raising taxes . Taking interest on the debt and defense spending off the table (as most Republicans insist) means cutting over half of everything else the federal government does . And that includes Social Security and Medicare. Just as important, setting 18% of GDP as a target for both tax revenue and spending is both arbitrary and unrealistic. As the chart at the top shows, over the last 30 years federal spending dipped to 18% only during the presidency of Democrat Bill Clinton. It never dropped below 21% during the tenure of supposed small government advocate Ronald Reagan. As for revenue, the CBO among others reported that the combination of the Bush tax cuts for the rich and the recession which started in 2007 drove total federal taxes as a percentage of the U.S. economy at their lowest level since 1950. Making matters worse, in December Republicans demanded another $140 billion windfall for the wealthy as their price for continuing tax relief for everyone else. (More galling still, in February the GOP’s Jim Demint (R-SC) and Mike Pence (R-IN) proposed legislation which would make the Bush tax cust permanent beginning in 2013 – and drain another $4 trillion from the U.S. Treasury over the ensuing decade.) At a time of war and economic recovery, government should be high – certainly well above 18%. And as the economic recovery progresses, the government should and must raise taxes to reduce future deficits and to pay off what will be a $3 trillion tab for the nation’s unfunded wars. But the various versions of the Republican Balanced Budget Amendment would make the necessary virtually impossible . While both the House and Senate versions allow for the federal government to run deficits in wartime, both chambers would require a three-fifths vote to suspend the spending limit and balanced budget requirement ” “when the U.S. is engaged in military conflict which causes imminent and serious military threat to national security and declared by a joint resolution that is approved by a three-fifths vote of each House of Congress.” Even more onerous: Furthermore, the Senate BBA prevents future Congresses from raising taxes in order to meet the requirements of the balanced budget by stipulating that any bills with tax increases will need two-thirds votes in both chambers. For his part, Senator Cornyn (R-TX) acknowledged his party’s latest ransom demand over the debt ceiling is a political ploy. Despite some Democratic support in the past (including from then Senator Joe Biden), the BBA is not going to get through the Senate and may not even come up for a vote. And that’s just fine with John Cornyn: “If, for some reason, the Balanced Budget Amendment were not to pass, I think the voters would then know, with very stark clarity, who is for a balanced budget and who is not, and it could have a big impact on the 2012 elections.” Of course, if for some reason Republicans follow through on their blackmail regarding the debt ceiling, the results would be cataclysmic. While the specter of a global financial cataclysm caused by the default of the United States caused most sentient mammals to denounce that prospect as “insanity” (Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee ), resulting in “severe harm” (McCain economic adviser Mark Zandi ), “financial collapse and calamity throughout the world” (Senator Lindsey Graham ), “financial disaster” (House Speaker John Boehner ), Mitch McConnell and his Senate Republican colleagues are determined to continue with the game of chicken. Apparently, American fiscal suicide is a small price to pay for political power. Meanwhile, the same Orrin Hatch who admitted that when a Republican sat in the Oval Office “it was standard practice not to pay for things” is now sponsoring his own version of a Balanced Budget Amendment. As Hatch declared last week : “A Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution’s time has more than come.” No, it hasn’t. A Balanced Budget Amendment is a bad idea whose time should never come. And to use it to hold America hostage over the debt ceiling is beyond dangerous. It’s suicidal. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …

During the 2008 presidential campaign one Fox News executive repeatedly tried to smear Barack Obama with charges of “socialism.” Liberal watchdog group Media Matters has uncovered audio that indicates Fox News Washington managing editor Bill Sammon was just engaging in what he called “mischievous speculation.” In 2009, Sammon told an audience aboard Mediterranean cruise sponsored by a right-wing college that his 2008 attempt to link Obama to socialism was “a premise that privately I found rather far-fetched.” “Last year, candidate Barack Obama stood on a sidewalk in Toledo, Ohio, and first let it slip to Joe the Plumber that he wanted to quote, ‘spread the wealth around,’” Sammon said. “At that time, I have to admit, that I went on TV on Fox News and publicly engaged in what I guess was some rather mischievous speculation about whether Barack Obama really advocated socialism, a premise that privately I found rather far-fetched.” During the 2008 campaign, the then-Washington deputy managing editor repeatedly suggested that Obama had socialist tendencies. On Oct. 14, 2008, Sammon said that Obama’s comment to Joe Wurzelbacher “is red meat when you’re talking to conservatives and you start talking about ‘spread the wealth around.’ That is tantamount to socialism.” In early February, Media Matters obtained an email where Sammon offered talking points to Fox News staff, linking Obama to socialism and Marxism during the 2008 campaign. “If Fox News really cares about its ‘reporting,’ they will fire DC exec Bill Sammon over this,” former MSNBC anchor David Shuster tweeted Tuesday. “These remarks, unearthed by the liberal advocacy group Media Matters, raise the question of whether Sammon, who oversees Washington news coverage for Fox News, was deliberately trying to sabotage the Democratic presidential candidate,” The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz noted . In another e-mail obtained by Media Matters, Sammon told his staff to downplay the importance of climate science that showed the world was getting warmer. Additional emails showed that Sammon asked his news department to refer to the public option as the “government run option” because polls showed the phrase “government option” was opposed by the public.

Continue reading …
Maxi skirts: how low can you go?

Don’t be afraid of the new longer length maxi and midi skirts. Here’s how to drop your hem and raise your style quotient Admit it. The fashioning-up of the longer skirt has piqued your interest, hasn’t it? The maxi skirt and its more awkward younger sister, the midi length, have – after a couple of seasons’s hard graft – finally stolen the limelight. It is the trend most likely to convert its catwalk kudos into commercial success and as a grown-up with a real body you’re keen to get involved, but more than a little bit wary because – and let’s not sugarcoat this – they might be less revealing but they are far from easy to wear. In fact they are downright difficult. The catwalks have been trying to convince us about “longer” for a while. Back in September there was a lot of hoo-ha after a beautiful Jil Sander show focused on floor-length couture-style skirts in pinks and oranges. It was, according to Caroline Issa, fashion director at Tank magazine and darling of the blogosphere, “the moment when I

Continue reading …
Maxi skirts: how low can you go?

Don’t be afraid of the new longer length maxi and midi skirts. Here’s how to drop your hem and raise your style quotient Admit it. The fashioning-up of the longer skirt has piqued your interest, hasn’t it? The maxi skirt and its more awkward younger sister, the midi length, have – after a couple of seasons’s hard graft – finally stolen the limelight. It is the trend most likely to convert its catwalk kudos into commercial success and as a grown-up with a real body you’re keen to get involved, but more than a little bit wary because – and let’s not sugarcoat this – they might be less revealing but they are far from easy to wear. In fact they are downright difficult. The catwalks have been trying to convince us about “longer” for a while. Back in September there was a lot of hoo-ha after a beautiful Jil Sander show focused on floor-length couture-style skirts in pinks and oranges. It was, according to Caroline Issa, fashion director at Tank magazine and darling of the blogosphere, “the moment when I

Continue reading …
Katy B: One step beyond

Katy B cut her teeth on London’s dubstep scene – but now the charts and breakfast TV are calling. The 21-year-old tells Rebecca Nicholson why she’ll always be a raver at heart In skinny jeans, red jumper and Vans trainers, her freshly dyed red hair pulled back, South London’s Katy B is a different kind of pop star. Somehow she’s got all bases covered, juggling white label, pirate-station authenticity and one-of-us, we-could-be-mates appeal. While the media still hypes indie bands, it’s an increasingly desperate endeavour: this week, the entire top 40 features just one – Noah and the Whale at No 19. Just as they have for the past two years, pop, dance and R&B continue to reign supreme, and Katy B, whose irresistible pop-dubstep single Katy on a Mission hit the top five last summer, is the current sound of both the clubs and the charts. At the east London headquarters of Rinse FM , the pirate station turned legit broadcaster which has been pushing the dubstep, grime and UK funky of London’s underground since its inception, Katy is busy attending to the business of being a pop star, choosing clothes for TV appearances and planning rehearsals for the live show she’s about to take on the road. Rinse is also home to her record label and management, and she spends her mornings here, working and hanging out. Today, she drops into the Grimey Breakfast Show, broadcasting from the studio next door, to mess around on air with host Scratcha . She gets her hair and makeup done for a series of photoshoots, gossips with her stylist about celeb-mag favourites Peter Andre and “new love” Elen Rivas, and fills me in on the EastEnders baby-swap storyline. It’s like going to the hairdresser, if the hairdresser had a healthy interest in the state of dubstep as well as holidays in Turkey with her mates. Born Kathleen Brien (“the most Irish name ever”) to a plumber father and postwoman mother, Katy grew up in Peckham, south-east London and learned her trade as a vocalist on the underground dance scene. She appeared as Baby Katy on DJ NG’s Tell Me when she was just 16, working mostly with bedroom producers whose records got picked up by pirate radio stations across the capital. In the four years since then, she has criss-crossed genres, singing over drum’n’bass, house, dubstep and its latest mutation UK funky, finally coming up with a debut album, On a Mission, that mixes up those styles into something both credible and accessible. There are mixed-up elements in Katy herself, too. She finished a degree in popular music at Goldsmiths university last year, at around the same time as she filmed her first music video. Her course involved writing an essay about UK funky , “the social elements around it and how it developed and stuff”, which she probably knew more about than the person marking her. Although her relationship with Rinse was well underway, she did the degree regardless: “I just wanted to learn more about music and I didn’t want to fall into getting a job and not pursuing it, so I thought it would keep me on that path.” And though she found her way into music through club nights and on pirate stations, she’s been a performer looking to turn pro since she was a child, auditioning for Annie in the West End when she was eight. “That was the first time I had to sing. I auditioned to be Hermione in Harry Potter as well. They were like, ‘Have you read the book?’ I was like, ‘No.’ ‘Next!’” When she was 14, she went to the Brit school for performing arts in Croydon, where she was in the year below Adele and Jessie J . “If people think it’s all singing, dancing and acting, well that’s what I wanted, do you know what I mean?” she says, insisting that going to stage school didn’t earn her any stick from the hipper-than-thou dance community. “I met all my best friends and I loved it,” she says, before summing up her overground/underground appeal completely. “But I didn’t make my music there, I did it outside. The first tune that I released, I

Continue reading …
Katy B: One step beyond

Katy B cut her teeth on London’s dubstep scene – but now the charts and breakfast TV are calling. The 21-year-old tells Rebecca Nicholson why she’ll always be a raver at heart In skinny jeans, red jumper and Vans trainers, her freshly dyed red hair pulled back, South London’s Katy B is a different kind of pop star. Somehow she’s got all bases covered, juggling white label, pirate-station authenticity and one-of-us, we-could-be-mates appeal. While the media still hypes indie bands, it’s an increasingly desperate endeavour: this week, the entire top 40 features just one – Noah and the Whale at No 19. Just as they have for the past two years, pop, dance and R&B continue to reign supreme, and Katy B, whose irresistible pop-dubstep single Katy on a Mission hit the top five last summer, is the current sound of both the clubs and the charts. At the east London headquarters of Rinse FM , the pirate station turned legit broadcaster which has been pushing the dubstep, grime and UK funky of London’s underground since its inception, Katy is busy attending to the business of being a pop star, choosing clothes for TV appearances and planning rehearsals for the live show she’s about to take on the road. Rinse is also home to her record label and management, and she spends her mornings here, working and hanging out. Today, she drops into the Grimey Breakfast Show, broadcasting from the studio next door, to mess around on air with host Scratcha . She gets her hair and makeup done for a series of photoshoots, gossips with her stylist about celeb-mag favourites Peter Andre and “new love” Elen Rivas, and fills me in on the EastEnders baby-swap storyline. It’s like going to the hairdresser, if the hairdresser had a healthy interest in the state of dubstep as well as holidays in Turkey with her mates. Born Kathleen Brien (“the most Irish name ever”) to a plumber father and postwoman mother, Katy grew up in Peckham, south-east London and learned her trade as a vocalist on the underground dance scene. She appeared as Baby Katy on DJ NG’s Tell Me when she was just 16, working mostly with bedroom producers whose records got picked up by pirate radio stations across the capital. In the four years since then, she has criss-crossed genres, singing over drum’n’bass, house, dubstep and its latest mutation UK funky, finally coming up with a debut album, On a Mission, that mixes up those styles into something both credible and accessible. There are mixed-up elements in Katy herself, too. She finished a degree in popular music at Goldsmiths university last year, at around the same time as she filmed her first music video. Her course involved writing an essay about UK funky , “the social elements around it and how it developed and stuff”, which she probably knew more about than the person marking her. Although her relationship with Rinse was well underway, she did the degree regardless: “I just wanted to learn more about music and I didn’t want to fall into getting a job and not pursuing it, so I thought it would keep me on that path.” And though she found her way into music through club nights and on pirate stations, she’s been a performer looking to turn pro since she was a child, auditioning for Annie in the West End when she was eight. “That was the first time I had to sing. I auditioned to be Hermione in Harry Potter as well. They were like, ‘Have you read the book?’ I was like, ‘No.’ ‘Next!’” When she was 14, she went to the Brit school for performing arts in Croydon, where she was in the year below Adele and Jessie J . “If people think it’s all singing, dancing and acting, well that’s what I wanted, do you know what I mean?” she says, insisting that going to stage school didn’t earn her any stick from the hipper-than-thou dance community. “I met all my best friends and I loved it,” she says, before summing up her overground/underground appeal completely. “But I didn’t make my music there, I did it outside. The first tune that I released, I

Continue reading …
Yates defiant over parliament claims

Scotland Yard acting deputy commissioner defends himself after criticism from MPs Scotland Yard’s acting deputy commissioner, John Yates, has continued to fight his corner in the face of further allegations that he misled parliament over the phone-hacking scandal. In written evidence to the home affairs select committee, Chris Bryant MP, who first laid the charge against Yates in the House of Commons earlier this month, claimed that: • Yates had always maintained there were very few victims in the affair, yet a briefing paper produced by Scotland Yard during the original inquiry had recorded that “a vast number of unique voicemail numbers belonging to high-profile individuals have been identified as being accessed without authority.” • Yates had told the home affairs committee last September that there was no evidence that MPs’ phones had been tapped, yet “at least eight MPs that I am aware of, have now been shown evidence that has been in police possession since 2006 that shows precisely that.” • Yates claimed that police had approached all known and suspected victims, yet they had failed to inform a number of people who had now been confirmed as victims including, Bryant said, the former deputy prime minister, John Prescott, actor Sienna Miller and her friends and family and interior designer Kelly Hoppen. • Yates had failed to tell select committees that police never fully searched the material which they seized in 2006 from Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator at the centre of the affair, and since this had later proved to include 2,978 mobile phone numbers, “it is difficult to see how his assertion that there were very few victims can possibly have been based on fact.” Yates emphatically denied he had ever misled parliament. He defended his position on the central point of law which has become the subject of a public dispute between him and the director of public prosecutions (DPP), Keir Starmer QC. Yates has consistently said that it is an offence to intercept voicemail only if it has not already been heard by its intended recipient. On this narrow interpretation, the hacking affair involved few victims and few offenders. However, the DPP has told the committee in writing that prosecuting counsel in the original inquiry in 2006 never adopted this interpretation and that it played no part in the charges brought against Mulcaire and the News of the World’s royal correspondent, Clive Goodman, or in the legal proceedings generally. Yates stood his ground. He said Bryant had been wrong to claim in the House of Commons on 10 March that the CPS had never advised police to adopt this narrow interpretation. He provided the committee with a written summary of evidence which he gave last week to the media, culture and sport committee listing a series of occasions on which the CPS had specifically told police that they had to prove not only that voicemail had been intercepted but this had happened before their intended recipients had heard them. “That advice permeated the entire inquiry,” he said. Yates told the committee that the advice had remained unchanged until October 2010, when Scotland Yard started a new inquiry and the CPS advised them to take a broader approach, simply regarding all interception of voicemail as illegal. He said Bryant had been wrong to suggest that in October 2010 the CPS had formally warned police that the previous advice had been wrong. “A different QC had provided some differing advice. It signalled an intention to take the broader view for the future.” He said Bryant had now “absolutely conceded” that he had been wrong on the point. However, in his written evidence, Bryant conceded only that “it is true that during the very early days, a lawyer at the CPS may have advised” adopting the narrow version of the law. He quoted the DPP’s claim that this advice “had no bearing on the charges brought against the defendants or the legal proceedings generally.” He suggested that that the original CPS advice had been set aside during the original inquiry, in August 2006, when David Perry QC was brought in as prosecuting counsel. “Perry expressly wrote to the CPS on October 3 2006 that all that they had to prove was that the message had been listened to by Mulcaire, not that the message was virgin.” Bryant went on to accuse Yates of misleading the culture, media and sport committee last week: “Even in his evidence to the DCMS committee last week, he disingenuously only referred to advice prior to August 9th 2006, before the first meeting at which David Perry gave the advice that secured the conviction of Goodman and Mulcaire.” The committee chairman, Keith Vaz, said the DPP would be giving evidence on the matter. The committee also asked Yates whether police had ever questioned Rebekah Brooks, the former editor of the News of the World and the Sun, over her 2003 evidence to a select committee that her journalists had paid the police for information. Yates said she had not been questioned but that Scotland Yard was currently ‘researching’ the matter to see what had been done about it. Yates was challenged by Mark Reckless MP to explain why he was willing to use public money to pay for lawyers to threaten newspapers whose reports he found objectionable, while victims of the hacking affair had had to spend large amounts of their own money to take civil actions to uncover the truth about crimes committed against them. Yates said the two points were completely separate and that, while he had asked for authority to use public funds for his legal advice, he had no intention of suing. Bryant referred to recent disclosures about a series of dinners where Yates and other senior officers met News of the World editors: “The Met have not helped themselves by having regular meetings with the News of the World at the same time as they are supposed to be investigating them.” There was, he said, “a serious risk that they might be perceived to be in collusion with the newspaper.” Yates said police were “duty bound to engage at various levels with politicians, businessmen and media” and suggested that he had probably had more lunches with the Guardian than with the News of the World. Bryant told the committee that he commended the current Yard inquiry under Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers. But he added: “The Met not only failed to do a full investigation in 2006; they have consistently and repeatedly failed to interrogate the evidence they seized in 2006; they have misled individual victims and potential victims; they have opened themselves to charges of collusion by frequently socialising with journalists and executives at the very organisation they were supposedly investigating; and they have consistently failed to give the full picture to this committee. Most worryingly, they have, for whatever reason, failed to expose the full degree of criminality involved, leaving victims to fend for themselves by dragging information out of the Met in civil court.” Phone hacking John Yates Police National newspapers Newspapers Newspapers & magazines Nick Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …