If the supreme court says innocence is no reason to commute, is it any wonder the US is one of the world’s leading executioners? On 28 March, the US supreme court refused to hear the death penalty case of Troy Anthony Davis . It was his last appeal. Davis has been on Georgia’s death row for close to 20 years, after being convicted of shooting dead off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah. Since his conviction, seven of the nine non-police witnesses have recanted their testimony, alleging police coercion and intimidation in obtaining the testimony. Despite the doubt surrounding his case, Troy Anthony Davis could be put to death within weeks. Davis is now at the mercy of the Georgia state board of pardons and parole, which could commute his sentence to life without parole. It will be a tough fight, despite widespread national and international support for clemency from figures like Pope Benedict XVI, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former US president Jimmy Carter. Davis’s sister, Martina Correia, has tirelessly campaigned for justice for her brother. In response to the supreme court decision, she told me : “We were really shocked and appalled when we received the news … no one wants to look at the actual innocence, and no one wants to look at the witness recantation as a real, strong and viable part of this case, even though new witnesses have come forward. There needs to be a global mobilisation about Troy’s case, and the fact that in the United States it’s not unconstitutional to execute an innocent person needs to be addressed once and for all by the US supreme court.” Correia brings up a significant but little-known fact about death-penalty law in the US – namely, that current court precedent allows the execution of innocent people. Remarkably, the supreme court, in a 1993 opinion, suggested that “actual innocence” is not a sufficient cause to be let free. The court only cares if the legal rules are followed, while acknowledging that innocent people could still be convicted and put to death. In such cases, a prisoner could appeal for executive clemency. It seems the court has not yet learned what many states have: that the death penalty system is broken beyond repair. Illinois recently became the 16th state in the US to outlaw the death penalty. Governor Pat Quinn, after signing the bill into law, said: “I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed … it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.” He follows an earlier Illinois governor, Republican George Ryan, who commuted the death sentences of 120 death row prisoners in that state. Both Illinois governors bring to mind former US supreme court justice Harry A Blackmun, who wrote, in a dissenting opinion in 1994 after the court denied yet another death row inmate’s last appeal: “From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” Tinkering with the machinery of death is just what some states seem to be doing. Thiopental is one of the three drugs used in the lethal “cocktail” administered in most executions in this country. Hospira, the last US-based company to make sodium thiopental , stopped making the controlled drug, creating a national shortage. States began scrambling to keep their death chambers well stocked. When California borrowed a similar drug from Arizona, California under-secretary of corrections and rehabilitation Scott Kernan wrote in an email: “You guys in AZ are life savers.” Georgia, it turns out, seems to have illegally imported its supply from a dubious, London-based company called Dream Pharma , run by a husband and wife duo out of a rented space in the back of a driving school. Georgia is not currently licensed by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to import controlled substances, so the DEA recently confiscated the state’s thiopental supply. Pending an investigation, Georgia will not have this key ingredient and will not be able to execute Davis or any other death-row inmate. On the same day that the US supreme court denied Davis’s appeal, Amnesty International issued its annual report on the death penalty . The United States remains among the world’s leading executioners, along with China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and North Korea. In addition to leading the fight for her brother, Martina Correia has been fighting for her own life. The day of the court decision was the 10th anniversary of her ongoing battle against breast cancer. Her face adorns the mobile mammography van that helps save the lives of poor women in Savannah. The National Breast Cancer Coalition named her and former House speaker Nancy Pelosi “Women Who Get It Right”. Correia, with customary humility, feels she won’t have earned the title until her brother’s life is saved as well. • Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column. © 2011 Amy Goodman; distributed by King Features Syndicate Capital punishment US supreme court US domestic policy State of Georgia Illinois United States Amy Goodman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …If the supreme court says innocence is no reason to commute, is it any wonder the US is one of the world’s leading executioners? On 28 March, the US supreme court refused to hear the death penalty case of Troy Anthony Davis . It was his last appeal. Davis has been on Georgia’s death row for close to 20 years, after being convicted of shooting dead off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah. Since his conviction, seven of the nine non-police witnesses have recanted their testimony, alleging police coercion and intimidation in obtaining the testimony. Despite the doubt surrounding his case, Troy Anthony Davis could be put to death within weeks. Davis is now at the mercy of the Georgia state board of pardons and parole, which could commute his sentence to life without parole. It will be a tough fight, despite widespread national and international support for clemency from figures like Pope Benedict XVI, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former US president Jimmy Carter. Davis’s sister, Martina Correia, has tirelessly campaigned for justice for her brother. In response to the supreme court decision, she told me : “We were really shocked and appalled when we received the news … no one wants to look at the actual innocence, and no one wants to look at the witness recantation as a real, strong and viable part of this case, even though new witnesses have come forward. There needs to be a global mobilisation about Troy’s case, and the fact that in the United States it’s not unconstitutional to execute an innocent person needs to be addressed once and for all by the US supreme court.” Correia brings up a significant but little-known fact about death-penalty law in the US – namely, that current court precedent allows the execution of innocent people. Remarkably, the supreme court, in a 1993 opinion, suggested that “actual innocence” is not a sufficient cause to be let free. The court only cares if the legal rules are followed, while acknowledging that innocent people could still be convicted and put to death. In such cases, a prisoner could appeal for executive clemency. It seems the court has not yet learned what many states have: that the death penalty system is broken beyond repair. Illinois recently became the 16th state in the US to outlaw the death penalty. Governor Pat Quinn, after signing the bill into law, said: “I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed … it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.” He follows an earlier Illinois governor, Republican George Ryan, who commuted the death sentences of 120 death row prisoners in that state. Both Illinois governors bring to mind former US supreme court justice Harry A Blackmun, who wrote, in a dissenting opinion in 1994 after the court denied yet another death row inmate’s last appeal: “From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” Tinkering with the machinery of death is just what some states seem to be doing. Thiopental is one of the three drugs used in the lethal “cocktail” administered in most executions in this country. Hospira, the last US-based company to make sodium thiopental , stopped making the controlled drug, creating a national shortage. States began scrambling to keep their death chambers well stocked. When California borrowed a similar drug from Arizona, California under-secretary of corrections and rehabilitation Scott Kernan wrote in an email: “You guys in AZ are life savers.” Georgia, it turns out, seems to have illegally imported its supply from a dubious, London-based company called Dream Pharma , run by a husband and wife duo out of a rented space in the back of a driving school. Georgia is not currently licensed by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to import controlled substances, so the DEA recently confiscated the state’s thiopental supply. Pending an investigation, Georgia will not have this key ingredient and will not be able to execute Davis or any other death-row inmate. On the same day that the US supreme court denied Davis’s appeal, Amnesty International issued its annual report on the death penalty . The United States remains among the world’s leading executioners, along with China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and North Korea. In addition to leading the fight for her brother, Martina Correia has been fighting for her own life. The day of the court decision was the 10th anniversary of her ongoing battle against breast cancer. Her face adorns the mobile mammography van that helps save the lives of poor women in Savannah. The National Breast Cancer Coalition named her and former House speaker Nancy Pelosi “Women Who Get It Right”. Correia, with customary humility, feels she won’t have earned the title until her brother’s life is saved as well. • Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column. © 2011 Amy Goodman; distributed by King Features Syndicate Capital punishment US supreme court US domestic policy State of Georgia Illinois United States Amy Goodman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …DNA database in UK confirms limb belonged to James Nolan, who has not been seen since his release from prison in 2010 The severed arm of a rapist who served a prison sentence in England has been found in Dublin Bay. Gardaí have confirmed that the arm of a man found on Dollymount beach is that of 46-year-old James Nolan, a sex offender and burglar who has not been seen since he was released from jail in November 2010. After the arm was found on 8 February, a DNA sample was sent to Interpol, and British police identified it as that of Nolan, a native of north Dublin. Nolan’s DNA had been held on a database in the UK; there is no such database in Ireland. He was sentenced to 14 years for rape in 1986, then after his release from prison he was jailed again for 18 months in 2009 for burglary. His whereabouts since his release from the Midlands prison in Ireland on 22 November 2010 is not known. His parents have died and his family in Finglas, north Dublin, have not seen him. Gardaí are now trying to establish the circumstances in which he lost his arm and say he may still be alive, although they fear he has been killed. Ireland DNA database Crime Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Gujarat votes unanimously to ban book, as its author Joseph Lelyveld dismisses claim it suggests Indian leader was bisexual A state in western India has banned Pulitzer-prize-winning Joseph Lelyveld’s new book about Mahatma Gandhi after reviews said it hints that the father of India’s independence had a homosexual relationship. More bans have been proposed in India, where homosexuality was illegal until 2009 and still carries social stigma. Gujarat’s state assembly voted unanimously on Wednesday to ban Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India. The furore was sparked by local media reports, based on early reviews in the US and UK, some of which emphasised passages in the book that suggested Gandhi had an intimate relationship with a German man named Hermann Kallenbach. The book has not yet been released in India. Lelyveld has said his work was taken out of context. ” I do not allege that Gandhi is a racist or bisexual in Great Soul ,” he told the Times of India. “The word ‘bisexual’ nowhere appears in the book.” However, several reviews of Great Soul detailed its sections on Gandhi’s relationship with Kallenbach. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Andrew Roberts said the only portrait on the mantelpiece opposite Gandhi’s bed was of Kallenbach. “How completely you have taken possession of my body,” reads one widely quoted letter from Gandhi to Kallenbach. “This is slavery with a vengeance.” Britain’s Daily Mail ran an article under the headline: “Gandhi ‘left his wife to live with a male lover’ new book claims”. The Mumbai Mirror on Tuesday ran a front-page story under the headline: “Book claims German man was Gandhi’s secret love”, which quoted the same passages as Roberts. Sudhir Kakar, a psychoanalyst who has written about Gandhi’s sexuality and reviewed some of his correspondence with Kallenbach, said he did not believe the two men were lovers. “It is quite a wrong interpretation,” he said. Gandhi’s great goals were non-violence, celibacy and truth, he said. “The Hindu idea is that sexuality has this elemental energy which gets dissipated,” Kakar said. “If it can be sublimated and contained it can give you spiritual power. Gandhi felt his political power really came from his celibacy, from his spiritual power.” He said Gandhi often filled his letters, including those to female associates, with strong love language, but that did not lead to physical intimacy. “Nothing happened,” he said. “He is telling his feelings, but they are platonic. They are not put into action. That would have been terrible for him.” Politicians in the state of Maharashtra, home to India’s financial capital, Mumbai, have also called for a ban on the book and, along with Gujarat’s chief minister, Narendra Modi, have asked the central government to ban publication nationwide. Modi said Lelyveld should apologise publicly for “hurting the sentiments of millions of people”. “It has become a fashion to tarnish the image of great Indian leaders for self-publicity and the sale of books,” said Sanjay Dutt, spokesman for the ruling Congress party in Maharashtra. “The government should invoke a law to severely punish anyone who tarnishes the image of the father of the nation.” Ranjit Hoskote, a writer and general secretary of Pen India, which fights for free expression, condemned the ban and said the local media had misconstrued both Lelyveld’s intentions and the nature of Gandhi’s relationship with Kallenbach. “You can’t cite a worse example of third-hand reportage and comment,” he said. “How can you ban a book you haven’t read?” He said Gandhi’s correspondence with Kallenbach has been available in library archives for decades. “There’s no secret. There is no scandal,” he said. Mahatma Gandhi India Censorship Gay rights guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Generally accurate rule of thumb: if things sound too good to be true, it almost always is. Michelle Rhee has become a darling of the Republican privatization fetishist set after her stint as the chancellor of the DC public schools, traveling around the country to talk up busting teacher’s unions, and acting as a consultant to the wingnuttiest of governors, Rick Scott of Florida . So it’s understandable that I took the glowing stories of how she revolutionized education in DC with her Schools First organization and saw dramatic test score increases with a rather large grain of salt. Turns out that was a good instinct : Former Washington, DC schools chancellor Michelle Rhee made her name on union-busting and allegedly improving test scores in the city’s public schools. The test score gains were always overhyped by her supporters—now it turns out that they may have been fraudulent. According to a major investigative piece by USA Today reporters Jack Gillum and Marisol Bello, at Crosby S. Noyes Education Campus: Standardized test scores improved dramatically. In 2006, only 10% of Noyes’ students scored “proficient” or “advanced” in math on the standardized tests required by the federal No Child Left Behind law. Two years later, 58% achieved that level. The school showed similar gains in reading. Rhee elevated the school as an example of how successful her program was, and handed out large bonuses to teachers and administrators. But a look at the test sheets of students during the time scores at Noyes were soaring shows a startling pattern of erasures in which an initial incorrect answer was erased and replaced with a correct one: In 2007-08, six classrooms out of the eight taking tests at Noyes were flagged by McGraw-Hill because of high wrong-to-right erasure rates. The pattern was repeated in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years, when 80% of Noyes classrooms were flagged by McGraw-Hill. On the 2009 reading test, for example, seventh-graders in one Noyes classroom averaged 12.7 wrong-to-right erasures per student on answer sheets; the average for seventh-graders in all D.C. schools on that test was less than 1. The odds are better for winning the Powerball grand prize than having that many erasures by chance, according to statisticians consulted by USA TODAY. It wasn’t just this one school, either: Among the 96 schools that were then flagged for wrong-to-right erasures were eight of the 10 campuses where Rhee handed out so-called TEAM awards “to recognize, reward and retain high-performing educators and support staff,” as the district’s website says. Noyes was one of these. Now, I wouldn’t suggest that Rhee herself was responsible for those erasures, but statistically speaking, it’s virtually impossible to believe that it wasn’t done intentionally. Those teachers each got an $8,000 bonus and the principal got a $10,000 bonus. And despite the fact we all know what mooches on the system teachers are, I’m pretty sure that $8K was pretty dear for them. Now a reasonable person might look at this and think, “Maybe we need to re-evaluate this system…because this is not a consequence I considered.” But that’s not Michelle Rhee. When Tavis Smiley asked Rhee about the USA Today report, Rhee predictably attacked the messengers . As the Washington, DC, Board of Education announces it will be looking into news that schools former Chancellor Michelle Rhee rewarded as high performers showed suspiciously high levels of wrong-to-right erasure patterns on test sheets, Rhee is lashing out : “It isn’t surprising,” Rhee said in a statement Monday, “that the enemies of school reform once again are trying to argue that the Earth is flat and that there is no way test scores could have improved … unless someone cheated.” No, Michelle. Flat-earthers follow faith, not evidence. Just as you are doing by trying to cast this as your reform or no reform, good guys and bad guys, evidence be damned. Michelle Rhee, Flat-earther. I like it. It’s also important to note that Rhee is also lying through her teeth with Smiley. Basically, her defense boils down to two: that there was only “one school” focused on in the article, and that a third-party investigation found that nothing happened. The first claim is just nonsense. The article focused specifically on just one school, but the investigation of cheating spanned over 100 schools, flagged because of the high erasure rates , including 96 in 2008, the year in which the vast majority of Rhee’s testing gains occurred. It wasn’t an isolated incident; it was systemic. USA Today’s investigation and charges are serious enough to lead the DC Board of Education to announce a hearing April 6 to determine whether Rhee’s office turned a blind eye to parents and others who questioned the test results. As for the “third party investigation,” Rhee was given evidence of possible cheating by CTB/McGraw Hill. Her response was to hire a consulting firm, that only looked at 8 of the flagged schools. They did no analysis – only interviews. And the president of the consulting firm admitted that it wasn’t a deep investigation. From the USA Today article: John Fremer, president of Caveon Consulting Services, the company D.C. hired, says the investigations were limited. The teachers were asked what they knew about the erasure rates but not whether cheating had taken place , Fremer says. They told Caveon that they ” did what they were supposed to do and they didn’t do anything wrong,” he says. The report created by Caveon was never released, so we don’t know what it actually found, but it’s safe to say from Fremer’s admission that this was not that serious an investigation. As a parent, I would want to be informed if my child’s test was questioned, but parents were never told that their kids might have gotten faulty scores. Rhee even tries a variation of the “librul media” smear against the paper. Make no mistake, USA Today is hardly my go-to publication, but this article was based on FOIA’d documentation and reviews by statisticians. It was part of an excellent series on cheating nationwide. Meanwhile, Rhee has been supporting the union busting around the country. Yesterday she was in Indiana, and spoke with the Republicans who were trying some of the same tactics used in Wisconsin. She spoke to the Indianapolis Star and repeated her claims. But today, USA Today ran another piece confirming that there needs to be more examination. The current schools chancellor, Kaya Henderson, has announced an investigation. This one will hopefully actually examine and analyze the erasures and irregularities. Maybe that’s why Rhee attacks the media… because she has no real defense and her reform is as questionable as those test results.
Continue reading …Newspaper vendor knocked down by riot officer had earlier been shepherded out of the police’s way at G20 protests Ian Tomlinson seemed to be “in his own world” and was not responding to police officers on the day he died at the G20 protests, an inquest has heard. Tomlinson was struck with a baton and pushed to the ground by Metropolitan police officer PC Simon Harwood in the City of London at around 7.20pm on 1 April 2009. Witnesses have told the jury at the inquest into Tomlinson’s death that 10 minutes earlier in a separate location, the 47-year-old newspaper vendor looked drunk as he stood in the middle of the road blocking the way of a police carrier. The incident on nearby Lombard Street, which was partially captured by photographs, occurred as Tomlinson attempted to find a way home from work past police cordons outside the Bank of England. The jury heard that officers used minimal force to escort Tomlinson off the road so a carrier van could pass. A number of witnesses said he had not responded to instructions to move and seemed oblivious to what was going on around him. “He was open mouthed,” said James Stone, a City worker attending a gym on the street, in a statement read out to court. “He had a vacant expression everywhere he looked. “I remember looking at my watch and seeing that it was 7.15. I saw Mr Tomlinson and thought to myself: ‘Boy, does he look wasted.’ The inquest has been told that Tomlinson was an alcoholic and had been drinking on the day he died. Traffic had been blocked on Lombard Street, which was behind a heavy police cordon of riot officers when Tomlinson arrived. PC Gareth Edwards, who was driving the van, said he beeped his horn twice, leaned out of the window and shouted at Tomlinson to get out of the way but the father of nine did not react. The inquest then heard how a number of officers from the police cordon firmly pushed Tomlinson, moving him on to the pavement. The van does not appear to have touched Tomlinson and there was no evidence that he was injured in what appeared to be a minor encounter. One witness, Warren Fraser, an IT worker taking photographs in the area, said Tomlinson appeared oblivious to his surroundings. “His responses were slow,” Fraser said. “He looked as if he was in his own world.” Although Tomlinson was calm and did not appear agitated, he said, the encounter, which involved two or three police officers, did prompt some in the crowd to complain. Fraser said he heard one person, possibly with a megaphone, say: “It takes three policemen to move one old man.” Once the van and gone past, Fraser said an officer gave Tomlinson “an encouraging push”, as if to send him away from Lombard Street. But Tomlinson did not immediately leave. “I got the impression that he stayed where he was in order to show independence and defy police,” Fraser said. The hearing continues. Ian Tomlinson Police London Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Move to deputy chief operating officer confirms Rupert Murdoch’s youngest son is being lined up as his successor James Murdoch is moving from London to New York to become deputy chief operating officer of News Corporation. He will report to Chase Carey, who is number two at the media conglomerate run by his father, Rupert. Murdoch Jr will also become chairman and chief executive of News Corp’s international businesses, retaining his responsibilities for Europe and Asia. The move confirms that the youngest of Rupert Murdoch’s three children from his second marriage is being lined up as an eventual replacement for the News Corp founder, who is the company’s chairman and chief executive. Murdoch Jr has been based in London since November 2003, first as chief executive of BSkyB, the pay-TV company in which News Corp is the largest shareholder and of which it is attempting to take full control. In December 2007 he was promoted to BSkyB chairman and chief executive of News Corp in Europe and Asia. In this role he oversaw businesses including the Times, Sunday Times, Sun and News of the World publisher News International, and News Corp’s satellite TV businesses in Germany, Italy and Asia. The deputy chief operating officer job is the same post his older brother Lachlan occupied until he resigned in July 2005 . In a statement, News Corp said James will “work closely” with Rupert Murdoch in what it described as a “newly created role”. Murdoch will focus on News Corp’s international assets, developing strategies that “strengthen and further evolve businesses”, the company said. Murdoch joined the company in 1996 to run a portfolio of digital businesses before moving to Hong Kong in 2000 to run its Asian TV business Star, which was losing money. He has been executive chairman of News International, News Corp’s UK newspaper arm, since 2007, when Les Hinton moved to the US to take charge of the Wall Street Journal. He is also a non-executive director of pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline and auction house Sotheby’s. Murdoch said: “I feel extremely fortunate to continue to support News Corporation’s international growth and also be given the chance to contribute to important initiatives across the company. Most of all, I am delighted to work even more closely with Chase Carey, whose extraordinary leadership is felt in every part of the business.” Carey, News Corp’s deputy chairman, president and chief operating officer, added: “As we become increasingly global and consumer focused, we believe there are real opportunities to add new dimensions to our core businesses. We are confident that James’ deep knowledge of international markets, his proven leadership, and his passionate focus on building consumer relationships make him the ideal person to help us realise these opportunities across all our companies.” •
Continue reading …enlarge Dave Weigel makes a good point in this piece: Public Policy Polling continues its tour of swing states that elected Republican governors last year and have already soured on them. In Florida, Rick Scott’s already deep in the negative zone. So Scott joins John Kasich of Ohio and Scott Walker of Wisconsin in the ranks of GOP governors with horrible robo-poll numbers only three months into their terms. The Florida difference: There hasn’t been a robust union or Democratic protest movement of Scott. There’s just negative media coverage about how his family could benefit from his own policies, complaints from Republicans about his leadership, disapproval of his cuts to education and the state workforce (as he phases in an end to corporate taxes), irritation with the cancellation of the Tampa-Orlando rail line, etc and so on. I wrote earlier this month that the rejection of these governors’ austerity packages were potential problems for the GOP’s national ticket in 2012 — it’s hard to win without Ohio and Florida. These are still potential problems. We’ve already heard quite a bit about Walker and Kasich. But what’s Rick Scott done that’s so bad? Well … A disabled food stamp applicant has asked the Florida Supreme Court to overturn Gov. Rick Scott’s executive order suspending agency rulemaking powers. Lawyers for Rosalie Whiley filed the petition Monday. It alleges Scott overstepped his authority by transferring rulemaking from agencies under the governor to his office. That halted rules to simplify the reapplication process for food stamps. Whiley, who is blind, said the new rules would have made it easier for her to apply for food stamps online. Her lawyers include former Florida State University president Talbot “Sandy” D’Alemberte, who said the order halts actions urgently needed to protect vulnerable low-income citizens. He also said the governor doesn’t have the power to suspend state laws. And then there’s stuff like this … Gov. Rick Scott offered little Tuesday when asked whether he would consider ending his family’s financial stake in Solantic, the urgent care company he founded and which provides drug-testing services. Scott’s role in the firm was spotlighted when he signed an executive order ordering drug-testing for new state hires and random screening of current employees. “As I’ve told you, I’m not involved in that company,” Scott said, refusing to directly answer whether he would consider prohibiting the state from contracting with the firm. Scott, who reported a net worth of $218 million when he filed papers to run for governor last summer, had pledged to put his financial holdings into a blind trust, when elected. Instead, in January, Scott transfered his Solantic stock to his wife, Ann. And … Scott, lawmakers want less oversight of nursing homes In the weeks since Gov. Rick Scott called for the ouster of Florida’s top nursing-home watchdog, Republican lawmakers have introduced more than a dozen bills that critics claim would further “neuter” the ombudsman program. The state Department of Elder Affairs also has notified Florida’s 400 mostly volunteer ombudsmen, instructing them not to speak to the media without alerting a district manager about the conversation and detailing the questions asked. “My biggest concern is that we can still speak for residents, still do yearly assessments of the facilities, still handle residents’ complaints and not be muzzled by the industry or the governor or anyone else,” said Lynn Dos Santos, chairwoman of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman Council and a volunteer herself. “Under the new policy, I shouldn’t be talking now. But the truth has to be told.” The developments come as the U.S. Administration on Aging investigates the dismissal of Brian Lee, who led Florida’s Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program for the past seven years. In part, investigators are looking into allegations that Scott broke federal law by “interfering” with the watchdog program, which is supposed to be independent. In case you were wondering, all of those stories occurred over the span of one day . I cannot imagine what other damage Scott is doing to his state on a regular basis. Maybe I should get a daily Google News alert on him just to satisfy my morbid curiosity. (Incidentally, America, I did try to warn you about this last year. You didn’t listen to me, but that’s OK. I still love ya.) But for Democrats, there is an upside to all this: From Scott to Walker to Kasich, all of the biggest jerkwad GOP governors are in swing states. An intelligent Democratic campaign for 2012 — and yes, I know, I shouldn’t assume any such thing — would go to voters in those states and say, “Hey, do you like the fact that your grandmother’s nursing home contracted her out to clean up toxic waste because Rick Scott decided that nursing homes don’t need oversight? Well you’ll love what the GOP is gonna do when they take over the entire federal government!” I’d also recommend the national Dems get involved in firing up their base voters in these key states by running campaigns against Republican lawmakers who have aided and abetted unpopular GOP governors. A simple campaign pledge of “I won’t force your granny to clean up toxic waste!” would be sufficient to get Democrats to turn out to the polls in droves. Hell, I think swing voters might find themselves attracted to that messaging as well. This sort of strategy can really get your base motivated to work and can also help peel independents away from the GOP. You guys gotta do something, because the prospect of a second Obama administration isn’t exactly making anyone excited right now. UPDATE : Or, alternatively, you can just play this video of Wisconsin GOP Rep. Sean Duffy saying that he’s “struggling to meet his bills” despite the fact that he makes $174,000 a year.
Continue reading …Four proposals seek to ban or limit US government’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions The US Senate is due to vote as early as Wednesday on measures that would strip the Obama administration of its powers to act on climate change. Up to four separate proposals in circulation this week would seek an outright ban – or at the very least severe limits and delays – on the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. President Barack Obama was expected to deliver a speech later on Wednesday pledging to cut America’s oil imports by one-third over the next decade, by ramping up domestic oil production and increasing energy efficiency. White House officials said Obama would continue to press for new nuclear plants, despite the still-unfolding crisis at Japan’s stricken Fukushima plant, and also said that the president would make a call for the manufacture of more electric cars. The various measures in front of the Senate would prevent the EPA from going ahead with new rules on greenhouse gas emissions from major power stations that started to come into effect this year. The measures were expected to be attached to a small business bill. The leading Republican proposal would impose a ban on any future EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, and prevent further improvements in car emissions standards after 2017. But it is the other proposals, put forward by Democrats, that could in the end destroy the last hopes of any strong action on climate change during Obama’s remaining two years in the White House. Even the most ardent opponents of the EPA’s climate change mission, such as Oklahoma senator James Inhofe, were unsure on Tuesday whether opponents of the climate regulation had the votes to pass an absolute ban. The White House has also said it would veto bills blocking the EPA. Inhofe told reporters he hoped the votes would put Democrats in coal and heavy industry states under pressure. “I do think this will force some Democrats to go on the record. And then the next time isn’t going to be quite so easy.” he told The Hill newspaper . But a Democratic proposal initially put forward by Jay Rockefeller, from the coal-mining state of West Virginia, was also gaining traction. Rockefeller’s proposal would put a two-year hold on EPA regulation on major installations. The idea is expected to pick up some support from coal state Democrats or those from conservative areas who are facing tough re-election fights in 2012 against conservative Tea Party Republicans. Obama administration officials had initially hoped to push Congress to pass climate change legislation, arguing that it was a better alternative to expanding government regulation through the EPA. Obama also offered deep compromises on his energy agenda to try to win over Republican support. He expanded offshore drilling only a few weeks before the BP oil disaster, extended $36bn in loan guarantees for new nuclear plants, and just last week opened up 7,500 acres for coal mining in Wyoming . But the strategy of using the EPA to scare Republicans into action backfired. After climate change legislation failed in the Senate , EPA action became the only course left to the Obama administration. Meanwhile, a new breed of conservative Republican vehemently opposed to government regulation began mobilising against the EPA and climate change regulations, calling the move to protect the climate a “job killer”. “It was a threatening argument [regulation through the EPA] – it did not help,” Senator Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican, told reporters on Tuesday. “It was clearly meant to be intimidating, but it did not succeed and the pushback now is strong.” Climate change Carbon emissions Obama administration United States Suzanne Goldenberg guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …