Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 61)
Two-thirds of Thailand cabinet are millionaires

Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra is second richest minister with net assets worth £11m, reveals anti-corruption watchdog Almost two-thirds of Thailand’s cabinet are millionaires, with the prime minister, Yingluck Shinawatra, second on the rich list. The national counter-corruption commission released the figures for the 36 ministers from asset declarations, which are mandatory for cabinet members. Yingluck declared net assets of 541m baht (£11m), including seven Hermès handbags, with the most expensive one worth 350,000 baht. She is the youngest sister of the former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, a former telecoms tycoon whose fortune was estimated by Forbes magazine at $600m. He was ousted by a military coup in 2006 after being accused of corruption, and part of his fortune, once estimated at more than $2bn, was seized by Thai authorities. The wealthiest in the cabinet is the science and technology minister, Plodprasop Suraswadi, with declared net assets worth 963.5m baht. He has spent much of his career in government service in areas related to natural resources, including as director of the fisheries and forestry departments. Yingluck came to office in August after leading her pro-Thaksin Pheu Thai party to a landslide election victory. Her assets also include eight cars – the most expensive being a Porsche Cayman – and a residence with a football pitch. Yingluck’s predecessor as prime minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva, declared assets worth 54.4m baht on leaving office, up from the 51.8m baht he declared when he came to power in December 2008. Thailand Thaksin Shinawatra guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bernie Goldberg: Trust in Media Low Due to Love Affair With Obama

As NewsBusters reported last Friday, America's trust in the media has fallen to new lows. Appearing on Fox News's “O'Reilly Factor” Tuesday, political commentator Bernie Goldberg said it was because of the media's love affair with Barack Obama (video follows with transcript and commentary): BILL O'REILLY, HOST: In the “Weekdays with Bernie” segment tonight, a couple of new media polls to tell you all about. According to Gallup, 55 percent of Americans do not — do not trust — the American media. Forty-four percent say they do. One percent apparently don't know what the media is. Also 47 percent believe the media is biased to the left. Thirteen percent say it's biased to the right. These must be communist people. And 36 percent opine the media is not biased at all. Another survey, this one by the Pew Research Center. Sixty-six percent of Americans say that TV news is their primary source of information. And preferences break down this way. FOX News Channel leads all TV news outlets with 19 percent of Americans saying they get their news mostly from us. Local news second. Sixteen percent dialed into that. CNN 15 percent. NBC News 10. ABC News 8. CBS 7. At the bottom, MSNBC, 6 percent. All Fidel Castro supporters. Joining us now from North Carolina to analyze, purveyor of BernardGoldberg.com, Mr. Goldberg. First of all, what happened to CBS News, your old employer? That used to be the gold standard. BERNIE GOLDBERG, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: The key words are “used to be.”

Continue reading …
Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablet announcement – live

The online retailer Amazon is unveiling details of its new tablet computer, expected to be called the Kindle Fire, at a briefing in New York. Follow live updates 10.19am ET / 3.19pm BST: So in effect, it’s the Kindle Touch. It’s a very stripped down looking e-reader. Now I see why he was managing expectations. It fits in the palm of his skinny hand – just. It looks like a Kindle, and has a touch screen. It’s black and white. I’m wondering if Bezos is about to do a Steve Jobs and pull out something a bit fancier in a minute. 10.15am ET / 3.15pm BST: Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is showing slides of all the negative comments that Kindle received. The sales charts show otherwise, he says. “Four years ago we stated with 90,000 books today it’s a million,” he says. “You can choose any of these books and have them in 60 seconds wirelessly.” This all looks like a pitch for how the new device will get better over time, to defuse criticism that it’s an underpowered iPad. 10.12am ET / 3.12pm BST: According to Bloomberg, the Kindle Fire will have a seven-inch display – half the size of the iPad. Priced at $199, it’s half the price of the cheapest iPad, which retails at $499, and will run on Google’s Android operating system. Bloomberg reported that Amazon shares rose $8.59, or 3.8 percent, to $232.80 at 9:47am on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Apple rose $3.46 to $402.72 10.06am ET / 3.06pm BST: Bloomberg is reporting that the Kindle Fire will cost $199 . I guess we are just about to find out. 10.04am / 3.04pm BST: We are sitting in Stage 37 – a warehouse on the west end of 37th Street in Manhattan. It’s a capacity crowd. And we are off. “New York City Two years Ago” reads the first slide, introducing an ad about the Kindle. 9.59am ET / 2.59pm BST: The press are filing in. Sadly I think there are too many of us for everyone to get a freebie. Here’s some pre-match comment from professor Ajay Bhalla from Cass Business School. He doesn’t think it will rival the iPad. “At this stage, it is incorrect to assume that Amazon tablet will be a true rival to Apple iPad.” He says Apple’s ecosystem is hard to imitate for rivals. Transferring their stuff between Apple devices is seamless. Apple has moved fast to replicate the same user experience across Mac and iOS devices. Can Amazon do what Apple has done? Has it got the focus Apple has? 9.45am / 2.45pm BST: I’m in a distant corner of western Manhattan waiting for Amazon to unveil something. Taking a leaf (or pip perhaps) from the Apple playbook, the company has sent an invite saying that we all expect to be the unveiling of a new tablet device called Kindle Fire. There are hundreds of journalists here. Not since Moses descended from Mount Sinai has a tablet been so hotly anticipated. Well, maybe not. Apple’s iPad is way more significant than the ten commandments. Apple now has 70% of the tablet market. So Amazon has a lot to prove. While I wait in line to get in, here’s the preview I wrote yesterday . Amazon.com Tablet computers United States Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lord Justice Leveson: we need to pull together on inquiry

Judge leading inquiry into press ethics and behaviour also clarifies vision for seminars providing background information Lord Justice Leveson has said he has a “vast and difficult task” ahead and needs to make sure everyone involved in the inquiry into press ethics and behaviour was “pulling in the same direction”. He told a preliminary hearing at London’s high court that he wanted to learn as much as possible about journalism and urged all the barristers and solicitors in the court room to tell him if he was missing any “perspective”. It was “critically important through this inquiry that I have the help of everyone”, he said. Leveson added: “I have a cast and difficult task to address within a comparatively short period of time. I will only start to be able to achieve a sensible resolution … if everyone is pulling in the same direction, albeit from different standpoints.” At the hearing, he made it plain that he and he alone would reach his conclusion and make recommendations about the future of the press when he reports back to David Cameron next year. He also issued further details about the dates and potential subject areas of the seminars he will hold ahead of the full inquiry. The first seminar on 6 October will be chaired by Sir David Bell, the former chairman of Financial Times, and will explore issues relating to privacy and the press. A second seminar has been scheduled for 12 October but no details of the subject matter have been released. Leveson said a list of witnesses had been drawn up to appear at the seminars but the letters had not been posted because of a challenge by Associated Newspapers on Wednesday on the role of the “assessors”, or experts, appointed to advise the judge. Associated is concerned that there is not an assessor with tabloid journalism experience among the six appointed by Leveson. After some legal debate he clarified his vision for the seminars – unlike the hearings when the inquiry proper gets under way, those invited will be asked to speak informally and will not be under oath. In each seminar, three people will give a 10-minute presentation “and then it is open to anybody else [in the audience] to contribute and add to the debate”. Leveson did not say whether the audience would be invited or open to the public. The seminars will be recorded, streamed live on the Leveson inquiry website and transcripts will be made available. •

Continue reading …

In the first of a new series, Jon Savage is trawling the archive of British Pathe newsreels to pick out pop cultural gems. He starts in the 30s with the phenomenon of jitterbugging Pathe had a long history of covering club life and dancing trends – there is an excellent series called London’s Famous Clubs and Cabarets from the mid-20s – but after swing culture arrived in Britain in the late 30s, it presented this frankly staid, pre-pop newsreel with problems of tone and explication. Swing was a souped-up refashioning of 20s hot jazz that originated in African-American culture at clubs such as Harlem’s Savoy ballroom. Its associated dance, the Lindy Hop – marked by the breakaway, when partners abandoned strict tempo and improvised – was first noted by the writer Carl van Vechten in 1928. When it crossed over to white audiences, swing’s dances were all lumped together by the media under the name “jitterbug”. Benny Goodman clearly remembered seeing his first jitterbug in 1934, when a male dancer started to go “off his conk. His eyes rolled, his limbs began to spin like a windmill in a hurricane – his attention, riveted to the rhythm, transformed him into a whirling dervish.” Jitterbugging was still a minority style in the UK before the second world war. In January 1939, Pathe bought in an American newsreel of a dance competition in Cincinnati, Ohio and entitled it Jitterbug Mania (see above). The brief English voiceover emphasises the strangeness and indeed the madness of this US import, while the original commentary introduces the style’s buzzwords: “hep cats and hep chicks”, “everything’s copasetic”, “Cincinatti’s leading rug-cutters and sharpies kick up the dust.” Swing culture became more firmly entrenched in the UK with the arrival of American GIs after 1942. At the end of 1943, Pathe produced two more films on the topic. Rhythm (see above) is an odd mixture of innovation and condescension that reflects just how bizarre American youth culture (the term was coined by the sociologist Talcott Parsons in 1942) must have seemed to British adults. Within just over two minutes, the piece cuts from a funky jazz drama to a disgruntled adult trying to shut out the noise, from the same adult, now a doctor, measuring the drummer’s heartbeat to a series of almost psychedelic electrical waves and animated diagrams. It ends with the briefest of clips showing Gene Krupa with the Benny Goodman Orchestra. There was no doubt about it, this was an alien import – a virus, almost (hence the medical, spacey feel of Rhythm) that threatened to infect British youth. What was needed was a firm hand, and that’s what we get in Jive Dance (see below) from November 1943. Walking down the stage stairs in full evening dress, dance teacher Josephine Bradley will quite clearly brook no nonsense. As Lou Praeger’s band strikes up a swing riff and the dancers begin to fling themselves around, she observes: “Well ladies and gentlemen, I think you will agree that that this is hardly a dance that will grace our ballrooms.” However “from it has evolved another dance, the jive” – and this is what Bradley and her two assistants proceed to lead us through. It’s strange to see the wildness of swing dancing approached in the style of strict tempo but the final shots, of an enthusiastic Hammersmith Palais audience, are much more like it: the exuberance of dance culture in one of its most celebrated venues. • The British Pathe archive contains 90,000 newsreels, from 1910 until the 70s. Jon Savage’s exploration of its wealth of pop material will appear on an occasional basis. Pop and rock Jazz Dance Jon Savage guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Jazeera accuses Israel over detention of bureau chief

Arabic news channel denies Samer Allawi has Hamas links and says his human rights were breached Al-Jazeera has denied allegations that its Kabul bureau chief has links to Hamas and accused Israeli authorities of “blatant breaches of human rights” over its treatment of the journalist. Samer Allawi was detained by the Israeli military for 49 days following a visit to his family in the West Bank. The Arabic news channel’s journalist was released from detention on Monday after a plea bargain resulted in a suspended jail sentence and a £900 fine. A spokesman for al-Jazeera said Allawi faced “false accusations” and suffered “psychological trauma” as a result of his detention. Shin Bet, Israel’s intelligence agency, said Allawi had admitted to agreeing to “to carry out military or organisational activity as required by Hamas”. This included “criticising American actions in Afghanistan and voicing support for the Palestinian ‘resistance’”, the agency said in a statement. The al-Jazeera spokesman denied these accusations. “While Samer has been released, the grounds for his extended detention are inexcusable: the false accusations made against him changed over the weeks as one accusation changed to another, finally settling upon an assertions that a Hamas official made a request to him at an open press conference,” the spokesman said. “Mr Allawi’s detention has been completely baseless. There was no clear process to this military detention. We continue to hold the Israeli authorities responsible for these blatant breaches of human rights and for causing psychological trauma for Mr Allawi, his wife, children, and his extended family through this ordeal.” Salim Wakim, the journalist’s lawyer, said Allawi had refused Hamas requests and that his client had been sentenced for “very, very, very trivial crimes”. Al-Jazeera also claimed Allawi was regularly denied access to his lawyer, his family, and medical attention, and called upon the Israeli authorities to “desist from harassing and impeding al-Jazeera and any other journalists from undertaking their professional responsibilities as reporters”.

Continue reading …
Julian Assange memoir sells just 644 copies

Huge publicity last week managed to generate only very modest sales for his ‘Unauthorised Autobiography’ Despite acres of publicity and buckets of scandal, Julian Assange’s unauthorised autobiography sold just 644 copies last week. Created with Assange’s cooperation (according to its publisher Canongate the Wikileaks founder spent more than 50 hours being interviewed for it) but published against his wishes, the book went on sale last Thursday amid widespread coverage and serialisation in the Independent. But in spite of the controversy surrounding the claims and counterclaims flung by Assange and his publisher , figures from book sales monitor Nielsen BookScan reveal that Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography sold just 644 copies in its first three days in shops. “It was only the 50th bestselling hardback non-fiction book of the week, and only the 537th bestselling book overall, sitting directly behind Julia Donaldson’s Freddie and the Fairy (Macmillan) and Sharon Kendrick’s Satisfaction (Mills & Boon), a £6.99 collection of three short stories featuring ‘three of her sexiest, most intense Greek heroes and glamorous heroines’,” said Philip Stone, charts editor at the Bookseller . But Canongate publishing director Nick Davies told the book trade magazine that the autobiography’s performance was “a marathon and not a sprint”, and that the publisher had “never made any big predictions about the sales of the Assange book – particularly on the first three days of sale”. “There was no build-up for the trade, the media or with the reading public. But we’re proud of the way we handled what has been a difficult and unusual launch, and we are extremely proud of the book,” he said. “Fortunately, the conversation now seems to be moving away from the ‘publishing story’ and focusing on the quality of the book itself. The early reviews – with the exception of a predictable whitewash in the Guardian – have been very positive, particularly in the Times and Independent with many more lead reviews lined up for this weekend. And the early customer reviews on Amazon are extremely positive too.” So far the Assange autobiography has attracted two five-star reviews on Amazon, one saying that the book “was a long long way from the negative view of him presented by a media I now see have an agenda”, the other that it painted “a vivid picture of a man on a mission to make the world a better – a more just – place”. It currently sits in 766th place overall on Amazon’s bestseller charts, and in 70th position on the internet bookseller’s biography list. Whether Assange will be pleased or disappointed by the numbers remains to be seen: although the Wikileaks founder said that Canongate’s publication was “about old-fashioned opportunism and duplicity — screwing people over to make a buck” , the publisher has promised to pay him royalties once it earns back its advance . Publishing Biography Julian Assange Booksellers Alison Flood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Daily Mail publisher challenges status of Leveson inquiry panel

Attempt to establish legal status of six advisers backed by Daily Mirror and Guardian publishers and national press body The publisher of the Daily Mail has challenged Lord Justice Leveson over the composition of his six-strong advisory panel, amid concerns that the prime minister’s appointees do not include anyone with tabloid or regional newspaper experience. The complaint is being supported by Trinity Mirror, publisher of the Mirror titles; the Newspaper Publishers’ Association, which represents the national press; and Guardian News & Media, which publishes the Guardian and the Observer. Associated is seeking to establish the legal status of the six advisers helping Leveson. Leveson told the early part of this morning’s hearing that he was eager to engage with the Daily Mail and said that he was trying to arrange for Paul Dacre, the paper’s editor-in-chief, to attend next month. The judge said: “I did ask him to participate on 6 October, but he can’t, and I’m waiting to hear from him about 12 October.” A solicitor representing Associated Newspapers told the hearing that “we do not want to be confrontational” and stressed the importance of the judge’s work, adding: “under the terms of reference [this inquiry] raises very important issues for the future conduct, regulation and ownership of the newspaper industry”. The six advisers are Sir David Bell, the former of the chairman of the Financial Times; Shami Chakribati, the director of human rights watchdog Liberty; Lord David Currie, the former chairman of Ofcom; Elinor Goodman, the one-time polictical editor of Channel 4 News; George Jones, the former political editor of the Daily Telegraph; and Sir Paul Scott-Lee, former chief constable of the West Midlands. Associated’s legal team voiced concerns that the six may be partial and “filter” their prejudices into the enquiry. However, Leveson stressed their role was only an advisory one. The judge challenged the view that the grouping had any sort of judicial role, noting that “the conclusion [of the inquiry] will be mine and mine alone.” The judge added: “I am very conscious that I am stepping into a profession that is not the one that I spent 40 years of life in. It is critiical that I obtain advice from those who have made their life in this area, not least because I would be keen to understand any flaws that I might have because of lack of experience.” •

Continue reading …
Brain-damaged woman should not be allowed to die, high court rules

Relatives lose bid to withdraw life-supporting treatment from woman known as M, who is in a minimally-conscious state A brain-damaged, minimally-conscious woman should not be allowed to die, a high court judge has ruled. The case is thought to be the first time that a judge has been asked to rule on whether life-supporting treatment should be withdrawn from a person who is not in a persistent vegetative state but is minimally conscious. Mr Justice Baker, who heard legal argument during a court of protection hearing in London in July, described the case as unique and said it raised “very important issues of principle”. Relatives wanted life-supporting treatment withdrawn and said the woman, who turned 52 earlier this month, would not want to live “a life dependent on others”. But a lawyer appointed by the high court to represent the woman opposed the relatives’ application for nutrition to be withdrawn – arguing that she is “otherwise clinically stable”. The local health authority responsible for commissioning her care also opposed the relatives’ application and said the woman’s life was “not without positive elements”. Baker heard that the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons and was referred to as M in court, suffered profound brain damage in early 2003 after being diagnosed with viral encephalitis. She was in a coma for several weeks and had been thought to be in a persistent vegetative state. Doctors later concluded that she was in a minimally-conscious state – just above a persistent vegetative state. Health guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Brain-damaged woman should not be allowed to die, high court rules

Relatives lose bid to withdraw life-supporting treatment from woman known as M, who is in a minimally-conscious state A brain-damaged, minimally-conscious woman should not be allowed to die, a high court judge has ruled. The case is thought to be the first time that a judge has been asked to rule on whether life-supporting treatment should be withdrawn from a person who is not in a persistent vegetative state but is minimally conscious. Mr Justice Baker, who heard legal argument during a court of protection hearing in London in July, described the case as unique and said it raised “very important issues of principle”. Relatives wanted life-supporting treatment withdrawn and said the woman, who turned 52 earlier this month, would not want to live “a life dependent on others”. But a lawyer appointed by the high court to represent the woman opposed the relatives’ application for nutrition to be withdrawn – arguing that she is “otherwise clinically stable”. The local health authority responsible for commissioning her care also opposed the relatives’ application and said the woman’s life was “not without positive elements”. Baker heard that the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons and was referred to as M in court, suffered profound brain damage in early 2003 after being diagnosed with viral encephalitis. She was in a coma for several weeks and had been thought to be in a persistent vegetative state. Doctors later concluded that she was in a minimally-conscious state – just above a persistent vegetative state. Health guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …