Moderate Islamist party An-Nahda tipped for victory in Tunisia’s first free elections nine months after people’s revolution The moderate Islamist party An-Nahda is tipped for a historic victory in Tunisia’s first free elections, the first vote of the Arab spring. Nine months after a people’s revolution ousted the dictator Zine Al Abidine Ben Ali and sparked the Arab spring, Tunisians turned out in record numbers to vote for a caretaker assembly that has to rewrite the country’s constitution and govern until parliamentary elections in a year’s time. An-Nahda, which was banned for 10 years and brutally repressed under Ben Ali, with activists exiled, tortured and imprisoned,said it had taken the biggest share of the vote based on early predictions before the official results expected . The party campaigned on a moderate, pro-democracy stance that sought to allay secularist fears by vowing to respect Tunisia’s strong secular tradition and the most advanced women’s rights in the Arab world. The party compares itself to Turkey’s Islamist-rooted ruling Justice and Development party (AKP) – liberal and socially conservative. Said Ferjani, from An-Nahda’s political bureau, said: “We have to be careful about figures until the official results, but there’s a consensus that we’re around the 40% mark. It’s something that we were expecting. “We already have our ideas about the government. We are not dogmatic; we are highly pragmatic. It will be a broad national unity government. The new reality is that we have to do what we do for the Tunisian people – we go beyond old lines of argument or disagreement.” The 217-seat assembly has a specific role: to rewrite the constitution and set the date for parliamentary elections in a year’s time. It will also form a caretaker government. Aproportional representation system meant regardless of the number of votes, no one party could take anan overall majority. An-Nahda is expected to form an alliance with the centrist secularist Ettakatol party, which is forecast to win 15-20% of the vote. The party’s leader, Dr Mustapha Ben Jafaar, was banned from running for president under the old regime. He could now become interim president with an Islamist prime minister and key ministers. The centre-left Congress for the Republic Party, led by human rights campaigner Moncef Marzouki, also did well. The centrist PDP, once the major opposition, suffered by association with the old system and performed poorly. Kais Nigrou, of the the Modernist Democratic Pole, a coalition of the centre-left which ran a secular, feminist campaign to counter An-Nahda, said: “We accept the democratic result and we’ll be in opposition. “The diversity and openness of civil secular society in Tunisia is strong and isn’t going to change. We don’t see a threat from Islamists. If 40% voted for Islamists, 60% of society did not.” An An-Nahda win would be the first Islamist election success in the Arab world since Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian vote. Islamists won a 1991 election in Algeria, Tunisia’s neighbour, but the army annulled the result, provoking years of conflict. Tunisia Africa Tunisian elections 2011 Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Surprise find at British Library is the script of ‘Umbrellas’, part of a 1960 revue performed only once at the Nottingham Playhouse It was part of a 1960 revue at the Nottingham Playhouse called You, Me and the Gatepost, performed for one night only, and then promptly forgotten. But the sketch, written by a 29-year-old Harold Pinter and lost for more than half a century, has re-emerged as a result of some diligent detective work and is published by the Guardian for the first time and in full. The sketch, set on the sunbathed terrace of a large hotel and called Umbrellas, is very Pinter, and if there was any doubt who the author was, then the 12 designated pauses are something of a giveaway. Pinter’s widow, Lady Antonia Fraser, said she had been “completely unaware” of the existence of Umbrellas. “It’s fun. We’ve all been quarrelling over acting it in the family. I want to act B, which is the better part, but so far I’ve only managed to act A, so we’re waiting for some really good actors to do it.” The sketch was discovered by Ian Greaves, who works on the archive of the absurdist playwright NF Simpson. Simpson contributed to You, Me and the Gatepost. Jamie Andrews, head of English and drama at the British Library, said once it was known the revue had been staged, the scripts had to be somewhere in the collections because every script was submitted to censors at the lord chamberlain’s office – and the library holds them all. The scripts were duly found and, to the amazement of everyone involved, there was Umbrellas, among 25 sketches performed that night. Greaves recalls feeling “astonishment. And wanting to get home and check every book I had on Pinter to try to get to the bottom of it. It is extraordinary that things like this can crop up.” While archivists do not think there are many more Pinter surprises in the British Library, they are fairly sure more may emerge about other writers from the archive of something like 56,000 20th-century scripts submitted to the lord chamberlain’s office, which finally lost its vetting role in 1968. The sketch was performed in a good year for the young Pinter, with A Night Out getting a huge ITV audience in the Armchair Theatre slot while The Caretaker was taking the West End by storm. Quite why the revue in Nottingham got hardly any coverage is another question – although the London-centrism of national newspaper critics is as good a reason as any. “It seems peculiar and incredible that a work by the West End’s ‘triumph’ Harold Pinter was just passed by,” said Greaves. The scripts come with a short “reader’s report” by someone called CD Heriot which recommends that the revue is allowed to go ahead without cuts. The report calls it “an excellent revue containing the best of all the fashionable ‘off-beat’ writers” – people such as Pinter, John Mortimer, Ann Jellicoe and Shelagh Delaney. The sketch’s existence was revealed as the theatre with which Pinter was most closely associated, the 130-year-old Comedy theatre, was officially renamed the Harold Pinter theatre. Fraser said she burst into tears when she heard of the plan at the end of the recent run of Pinter’s Betrayal. “It is an extremely moving day for me. Harold would have been completely thrilled, there’s no question at all about that.” Fittingly, the first play to be staged in the newly renamed theatre is Ariel Dorfman’s Death and the Maiden, starring Thandie Newton, which had its first night on Monday night. Dorfman said Pinter was the play’s mentor, using his influence to get it performed at the Royal Court after seeing a read-through at the ICA in 1990. “For me, it’s magical,” said Dorfman. “That the first play in the Pinter theatre should not be a Pinter play, but a play that is possible because he existed is the most enduring testimony to his legacy.” “It is as if the gods of theatre and the arts are conspiring to make this a very significant event. I’m sentimental about these things but I do believe in these magical coincidences. Dorfman, a good friend of Pinter and Fraser, has also read Umbrellas. “I loved it,” he said. “It is so much Harold. I love these two old gents in the sun speaking about umbrellas. It somehow is absurd, but everyday absurd; the sort of thing you could overhear.” Critic’s view We tend to forget that, between the failure of The Birthday Party in 1958 and the success of The Caretaker in 1960, Harold Pinter wrote many revue-sketches. While this latest example to come to light may be a squib, it’s certainly not a damp one: try reading it aloud with someone and you’ll see how it works. For a start it depends heavily for comic effect on the pauses between the lines: a skill which Pinter told me he’d acquired from seeing Jack Benny at the London Palladium in the late 1940s. As in all Pinter’s sketches, you also get a hint of themes he was to explore in his plays. This one clearly is about power: character A smugly rejoices in the fact that he has it, while character B is left in a state of impotent envy. I wouldn’t place this sketch on the same level of Pinter’s miniature masterpiece, Last To Go, in which a coffee-stall owner and a newspaper seller fend off fear of loneliness and death through desultory chat. But it’s wonderful to have a bit of newly-discovered Pinter. It also reminds us that, along with Peter Cook, Pinter was a prolific revue-sketch writer who used a popular form to explore the oddities of human behaviour. Michael Billington Umbrellas, by Harold Pinter Two gentlemen in deckchairs on the terrace of a large hotel. Wearing shorts and sunglasses. Sunbathing. They do not move throughout the exchange A: The weather’s too much for me today. PAUSE B: Well, you’re damn lucky you’ve got your umbrella. A: I’m never without it, old boy. PAUSE B: I think I’d do well to follow your example. A: Yes, you would. Means the world to me. I never find myself at a loss. You understand what I mean? B : You’re a shrewd fellow, I’ll say that for you. PAUSE A : My house is full of umbrellas. B : You can’t have too many. A : You’ve never said a truer word, old boy. PAUSE B : I haven’t got one to bless myself with. PAUSE A : Well, I can forsee [sic] a time you’ll regret it. B : I think the time’s come, old boy. A : You can’t be too careful, old boy. PAUSE B : Well, you’ve got your feet firmly planted on the earth, there’s no doubt about that. PAUSE A : I certainly feel secure, old boy. B : Yes, you know where you stand, all right. You can’t take that away from you. PAUSE A : You’ll find they’re a true friend to you, umbrellas. PAUSE B : Maybe I’ll buy one. PAUSE A : Don’t come to me. It would be like tearing my heart out, to part with any of mine. PAUSE B : You find them handy, eh? PAUSE A : Yes … Oh, yes. When it’s raining, particularly. Blackout © The estate of Harold Pinter 2011 All rights reserved Harold Pinter Theatre British Library Mark Brown guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media The Fox & Friends kids’ reaction to the Stacey Hessler story was the same sort of predictable nonsense you’d expect from people paid primarily to get outraged over the latest liberal/marxist attack on America. The weekend edition though just might be outdoing their weekday counterparts in hysteria. According to them, Hessler is (a) an unfit mother of four young kids for leaving them behind in Florida as she lives on the street in Manhattan; (b) who probably wasn’t ‘putting out’ for her banker husband anyway (hmm…oh, nevermind); and is now (c) shacked up with some young waiter from Brooklyn. BRIGGS: I want to reiterate what Ali mentioned, this 38 year old Hessler, mother of four says, “Military people leave their families all the time, so why should I feel bad? I’m fighting for a better world.” That is more disgusting than any of the filth down there on Wall Street. Equating what she’s doing with military service, Joe Biden would be embarrassed by that. MORRIS: Her husband also works for a bank. CAMEROTA: He’s a banker. He works at a bank. MORRIS: Why not just protest at home? CAMEROTA: Maybe she has… MORRIS: Yeah, maybe that’s been part of the problem. CAMEROTA: Her husband banker used to work at Bank of America and now works for a local bank in Florida. She’s clearly having a mid-life crisis of some sort to leave your kids. And she said that she doesn’t plan to go home. Actually she’s going to stay there for the duration. MORRIS: So good. A role model. BRIGGS: Mother of the year . Jonah Goldberg at The National Review used that as an epithet first. This “unfit mother” though seems awfully committed to her kids. From her Facebook Wall : I have a plea for my friends. I need your help and support. I want to stay occupying wall st. I feel my presence is very important in the support of non-violent communication and sanitation(keeping the park clean) I am willing to work tirelessly on these efforts. I need help with getting my kids to activities and stepping up with the things I help lead, such as one small village, jr roller derby, bee-attitudes, 4H, for his glory co-op. Please respond if you are willing to help my kids so I can stay here and help this movement. I have a train ticket for tomorrow that I want to change but I need to know I have support from my community back home for my family in order to change the ticket. Their fantasies run amuck they then turn to an Associated Press poll that they say says 56% of Americans don’t support the Occupy Wall Street protests. Except that poll says no such thing. It asks: OWS1. Do you consider yourself a supporter of the Wall Street protests, or are you not a supporter of the Wall Street protests? ….which is an entirely different question than asking if you agree or disagree with the goals of the movement, or if you oppose, as a recent Gallup survey asked. For comparisons’ sake, a recent Time poll had only 6% of the respondents saying they considered themselves members or followers of the Tea Party. But such is life in Foxland, where facts really don’t matter if you have another narrative to sell. Here is Stacey Hessler reacting to the NY Post article about her that sparked all this vileness.
Continue reading …Julian Assange, co-founder of WikiLeaks, announces that the whistleblowing website is suspending publishing operations to fight ‘arbitrary and unlawful’ financial blockades
Continue reading …Julian Assange, co-founder of WikiLeaks, announces that the whistleblowing website is suspending publishing operations to fight ‘arbitrary and unlawful’ financial blockades
Continue reading …Kenyan Red Cross reports one dead and eight injured in explosion, hours after grenade attack at bar in capital At least one person has died in an explosion at a bus stop in Nairobi, hours after a grenade attack at a bar in the Kenyan capital. The second blast, at a crowded bus stop in a working-class neighbourhood, was reported by the Kenyan Red Cross. It said on Twitter that one person had been killed and another eight had been taken to Kenyatta national hospital. The grenade blast wounded a dozen people, three critically. The attacks, which have not been linked, have raised fears of reprisals from Islamist groups for Kenya’s support in fighting Islamists in neighbouring Somalia. The US embassy in Kenya warned two days ago of an imminent attack, Reuters said. Mathew Iteere, the Kenyan police commissioner, said there was no firm link between the two blasts and Somalia’s al-Shabaab rebels, who have been linked to al-Qaida. Kenya Africa Jo Adetunji guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Vatican thinktank wants global authority to police markets • Economy needs people-centred ethics, cardinals argue If Vatican cardinals have yet to join the Occupy Wall Street protesters on the barricades, a document released by the Holy See calling for a “world authority” to crack down on runaway capitalism suggests some are seriously considering it. Written by the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and released on Monday, “Towards reforming the international financial and monetary systems in the context of a global public authority” suggests a beefed-up United Nations could police the financial markets and inject a dose of ethics to replace rampant profiteering and reduce inequality. The pamphlet claims that in combination with a “central world bank”, such an authority would help restore “the primacy of the spiritual and of ethics”, as well as “the primacy of politics – which is responsible for the common good – over the economy and finance”. Financial transactions would be taxed to promote global development and sustainability, while “virtuous” banks helping out the “real economy” would qualify for state subsidy should they need it. Presenting the document at the Vatican, the council’s secretary, Bishop Mario Toso, said the 1944 deal on international finance signed at Bretton Woods had failed, while the G20 group of nations was unable to rein in deregulated markets. The document also says the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is no longer up to the job of stabilising the global financial system. Toso admitted that these ideas appeared to sympathise with those of ” los indignados “, the Spanish protest over mass youth unemployment, but stressed that the document was built on existing Vatican teaching, notably Pope Benedict XVI’s 2009 encyclical , which criticised free market fundamentalism. According to the pamphlet, Benedict had singled out the moral as well as economic and financial roots of the crisis. “To function correctly the economy needs ethics, and not just of any kind but one that is people-centred.” The pope, it adds, “himself expressed the need to create a world political authority”. The document also picks up on the pope’s denunciation of a new “technocracy”, and raises concerns over automated trading. “Seventy per cent of financial transactions are today performed in milliseconds by algorithms,” said Leonardo Becchetti, an Italian professor of economics, who helped draft the document. The document adds: “The speculative bubble in real estate and the recent financial crisis have the same origin in the excessive amount of money and the plethora of financial instruments globally.” Letting Lehman Brothers fail, thanks to a “liberalist approach, unsympathetic towards public intervention in the markets”, only worsened the crisis, it adds. Looking ahead to the G20 conference in Cannes on 3 and 4 November, Cardinal Peter Turkson, the head of the pontifical council, said the pope would be keeping a close eye on proceedings and looking for “a clear vision of economic, social, cultural and spiritual aspects”. Global economy Vatican Italy Religion Catholicism Economics Occupy movement Banking reform Banking Financial sector Tom Kington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Sunday that saving the jobs of police and firefighters was not the role of the federal government. CNN’s Candy Crowley reminded the Kentucky Republican that a recent Gallup/ USA Today poll found that 75 percent of Americans supported President Barack Obama’s plan to provide additional money for teachers, police and firefighters. “Republicans helped not break a filibuster, if you will, in a procedural vote,” Crowley explained. “You basically got rid of that jobs bill which would have given money to the states, designed to hire or retain fireman, policeman and teachers. When we look at the polling, 75 percent of Americans supported that and yet, the Republicans were against it. So, how do you justify that in your mind?” “Well, Candy, I’m sure that Americans do,” McConnell remarked. “I certainly do approve of firefighters and police. The question is whether the federal government ought to be raising taxes on 300,000 small businesses in order to send money down to bail out states for whom firefighters and police work. They’re local and state employees.” “The question is whether the federal government can afford to be bailing out states. I think the answer is no.” “The fact is that when you do ask people about this surtax on millionaires, and small businesses as you put it but millionaires in general, people support that, when it comes to not just firemen, policemen and teachers but also the infrastructure bill that’s coming up, which you’re also opposed to, as I understand it, which would help put people back to work on roads and bridges and rebuilding and that sort of thing,” Crowley noted. “It seems to me that politicians are always talking about doing the will of the American people, and that the Republican Party can be seen at least politically as going against that.” “Yeah, these bills are designed on purpose not to pass,” McConnell asserted. “I mean, the president is deliberately trying to create an issue here. Look, the American people don’t think, I’m sure, that it’s a good idea. Four out of five of the so-called millionaires are business owners, over 300,000 small businesses in our country that hire people. I don’t think the American people think that raising taxes on business, small business in the middle of this economic situation we find ourselves in is a particularly good idea.”
Continue reading …Former News International executive stands by his statement to parliament in 2009 despite having seen Clive Goodman letter Les Hinton, one of Rupert Murdoch’s key executives when phone hacking was taking place at the News of the World, has defended his decision to tell MPs two years ago there was no evidence the practice was rife. Appearing before the culture, media and sport select committee via satellite from the US, the former chairman of the News of the World’s UK parent News International said he had been right to tell parliament in 2009 that hacking was restricted to a single reporter. It has subsequently emerged that when Hinton gave that evidence, he had seen a letter sent in 2007 by the paper’s former royal editor Clive Goodman, which alleged hacking was widely discussed at the title during news meetings. “I don’t think I’d regard Mr Goodman’s letter as evidence of anything,” Hinton told MPs on Monday. “They were accusations and allegations.” Hinton insisted that the company “reacted very responsibly” to Goodman’s letter, which resulted in an enquiry by Harbottle & Lewis that found no evidence to support the reporter’s claims. Challenged about why he had told the same committee in September 2009 that NI had found nothing that indicated a “suspicion” of hacking – a phrasing that Paul Farrelly, the MP questioning Hinton, said should have encompassed the Goodman letter. In response, Hinton insisted his statement of two years ago had been “valid”. Hinton, who was executive chairman of NI until 2007, appeared to suggest he had not overseen two separate external investigations into the hacking allegations, by law firms Burton Copeland and Harbottle & Lewis, but had delegated them. He also repeatedly said he struggled to recollect events which happened up to four years ago. That prompted Labour MP Paul Farrelly to jokingly compare Hinton to a mushroom. “You seem to have been kept in the dark by a lot of people,” Farrelly said. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Les Hinton Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Action against officer in charge of army unit that killed Palestinian in Qusra was taken due to ‘a number of incidents’ The commander of an Israeli army unit whose soldiers shot dead a Palestinian protester just hours before president Mahmoud Abbas called on the United Nations to recognise a Palestinian state has been relieved of his post. The lieutenant in the Haruv battalion, who has not been named, had a history of disciplinary transgressions. The death of 34-year-old Essam Oudah in the West Bank village of Qusra was not thought to be the main factor in the action against him. “The officer was dismissed from his command due to a number of operational and disciplinary incidents,” an Israel Defence Forces (IDF) statement said. Oudeh was killed after Palestinian men rallied to protect the village from a feared incursion by nearby settlers. The village had formed a defence committee following the vandalising of one of Qusra’s mosques by settlers last month – an attack condemned by the US and European Union. On 23 September, the day Abbas submitted the Palestinians’ formal request to be admitted as a full state to the UN, warnings were broadcast from Qusra mosques that settlers were approaching. Hundreds of men and youths streamed to the edge of the village. The Guardian, which was present for the standoff between villagers and settlers, saw no stone throwing or physical confrontation from either side before the Israeli army began firing teargas at the Palestinians. Later that day, an IDF statement said a “mutual rock hurling incident … incited a violent riot, during which Palestinians hurled rocks at security personnel”. The army opened fire with live bullets, injuring three Palestinians, including Oudeh who subsequently died. The army launched an investigation. According to a report on the Israeli Ynet news website, the army inquiry concluded the incident was an “operational failure” and that the commander had made an error of judgment in ordering troops to open fire. The officer told investigators his team felt threatened and outnumbered, according to Ynet. The IDF declined to comment beyond a brief statement. The commander is to remain in the IDF, but not in a combat role. An Israeli settler and his infant son were killed on the same day after Palestinians threw rocks at their car near Hebron, causing it to overturn. Israel Palestinian territories Protest Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …