Glenn Beck: Mike Huckabee Is ‘Thin-Skinned,’ Shouldn’t Run In 2012 (VIDEO)
April 22, 2011 No Comment
Glenn Beck struck back at Mike Huckabee on his Friday show, calling his fellow Fox News host “thin-skinned” and maintaining his charge that the former Arkansas governor was a “progressive.” He also said that Huckabee should sit out the 2012 race if he couldn’t take his criticism. The feud between the two began on Tuesday, when Beck used the term to describe Huckabee due to his support of Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity initiative. Huckabee responded by attacking Beck on his website and on the radio, saying that Beck is against Obama’s programs “either out of ignorance or out of a deliberate attempt to distort them to create yet another ‘boogey man’ hiding in the closet that he and only he can see.” He also said that the term “progressive” is the same as “cancer” and “Nazi” to Beck. On Friday, Beck weighed in at length. He took offense to both of these charges. “The only place that I’ve ever heard that kind of a smear is on George Soros’ website, Media Matters,” Beck said, adding that he only ever claimed that Nazis used tactics favored by progressives. “Interesting how you would go to Media Matters’ talking points when you feel like it would benefit you, Mr. Huckabee. I’ve never said progressive is the same as Nazi. So, let’s not try to twist this into me accusing you of killing millions of Jews.” He then claimed that he was merely pointing out the obvious: that Obama’s program is “not conservative…it’s not anything that a libertarian would understand.” After that, he went on a long monologue about various other “progressive” things Huckabee has done during his career. Beck concluded by turning to Huckabee’s chances if he runs for the presidency again. “If, sir, you are this thin-skinned about your politics, it might be best for you to stay on the sidelines,” Beck said. “The last thing we need is someone challenging Barack Obama, not as President of the United States but challenging Barack Obama for his title as the most thin-skinned President in American history.” WATCH:
Continue reading …
With rents on the rise mortgage lenders see landlords as a better bet than first-time buyers. Patrick Collinson asks if a worrying bubble is being created in a resurgent market Britain’s lenders are turning their backs on first-time buyers and other traditional borrowers, and granting mortgages to landlords instead amid signs of a new buy-to-let bubble. Northern Rock this week joined an expanding list of lenders, including a Lloyds Banking Group subsidiary, pushing out new buy-to-let loans on better terms, while Santander is also preparing to enter the market. In an extraordinary admission, Nationwide – one of the biggest mortgage lenders – says it would rather give mortgages to landlords than first-time buyers. Matthew Wyles, the society’s “distribution director”, told an industry debate hosted by HSBC: “As a lender, we would rather lend 75% LTV [loan-to-value] on a buy-to-let mortgage to an experienced buy-to-let investor, than to a first-time buyer at 95% LTV.” Figures from the data provider Moneyfacts show that the number of buy-to-let loans available to landlords has doubled over the past year, with the pace of new launches accelerating in recent weeks. According to its research, there are 434 different buy-to-let loan offers currently available, compared with 215 at the start of 2010 and 330 just a month ago. Behind the dash back into buy-to-let is the rise in rents in a market fuelled by frustrated first-time buyers who can’t find the finance for a home of their own. This week, LSL Property Services , Britain’s biggest network of letting agents, said that rents were “powering ahead” in many parts of the country, especially London. David Newnes of LSL, which owns Your Move and Reeds Rains, says: “Landlords are seeing demand for their properties go from strength to strength. First-time buyers simply can’t afford the average £25,000 deposit required and, as a result, most are remaining in rented accommodation for nearly a decade. “The growing demand continues to outstrip supply, and this is pushing rents upwards beyond the rate of inflation, and well above wage rises.” Big lenders are also easing constraints that were put on borrowing during the credit crunch. According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), £3bn worth of loans were granted to landlords in the last quarter of 2010 – substantially below the peak levels of 2006 and 2007, but up 42% over the year. The CML added that the average loan ceiling for investors – the maximum amount an individual landlord can borrow from a single lender – has risen from £2m to £2.5m over the past year. Separately, maximum LTVs on buy-to-let mortgages have edged up in recent months towards 85%. State-owned Northern Rock , which this week cut rates on buy-to-let loans by 0.4%, will offer landlords mortgages on up to 10 properties, worth up to £3m. Landlords need prove an income of only £25,000 a year to start qualifying for buy-to-let loans. Meanwhile BM Solutions , a division of Lloyds, is promising a “one-minute mortgage” deal for landlords. Some of the specialist lenders that withdrew from the market during the credit crunch have now reopened for business. A name synonymous with the pre-2008 boom, Mortgage Trust , part of the Paragon Group, this week returned to the market three years after closing its doors. It promises cheap and simple mortgages for smaller landlords, starting at 3.99%, and what’s called “fast-track” underwriting through mortgage intermediaries. Fast-track underwriting has a controversial recent history. In July last year, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) published proposals to ban fast-track and “self-cert” mortgages, effectively granted without stringent checks on an applicant’s income and ability to repay. It also expressed concerns about interest-only mortgages. But unlike conventional residential mortgages, buy-to-let deals are not subject to regulation by the FSA. Interest-only lending to landlords is commonplace, and lenders are free to offer fast-tracking. In a note this week hailing the return of Mortgage Trust, Legal & General’s Mortgage Club told landlords that the loans would be subject only to “fast-track, credit score-based underwriting”. The revival in buy-to-let has angered critics who argue that lending to landlords has prevented millions from buying a home. Matt Griffiths of the campaign group PricedOut says: “For anyone concerned about maintaining widespread home ownership, this is deeply worrying. Many young people are now being effectively disenfranchised from the property-owning democracy by buy-to-let investors. Buy-to-let benefits from both cheaper mortgage finance (via the use of interest-only mortgages) and tax breaks on interest payments, which means they can easily outgun any first-time buyer for the purchase of lower-end properties. “This has been exacerbated by the growing tendency of first-time buyers to use repayment mortgages (over 90% did in December 2009), and the higher deposit barrier required by cautious mainstream lenders. This is deeply ironic, as buy-to-let activity has been much riskier and more volatile than lending for normal homebuying.” Will the re-emergence of buy-to-let be a warning light to regulators and the Bank of England? Eight of the top nine UK buy-to-let lenders in 2007 have since been either rescued by the taxpayer, closed to further business or forced to undergo substantial retrenchment. PricedOut argues that, in the run-up to the financial crisis, buy-to-let disproportionally utilised the new financing opportunities created by investment bank securitisation deals, and was dominated by short-term and speculative behaviour. “It was the main conduit through which excessive credit availability has been transmitted and amplified into the UK housing market,” says Griffiths. PricedOut wants buy-to-let to be regulated, but recent government intervention has favoured landlords. In the last budget, the chancellor unveiled a £560m tax giveaway on buy-to-let stamp duty bills. Meanwhile tenants face an uphill struggle to save the large deposits needed to obtain a mortgage, as landlords push through rent rises much in excess of wage rises. LSL predicts that, at the current rate of increase, average monthly rents paid by tenants across Britain will hit £715 this time next year, and top £1,050 in London. Property investment firm Assetz , one of the cheerleaders of the buy-to-let boom, said business had doubled over the past year and that landlords are fast replacing first-time buyers. Its chief executive, Stuart Law, told the industry magazine Mortgage Strategy this week that: “Lenders are making no secret of the fact that they would rather allocate the limited funds they do have to the lower-risk option of buy-to-let loans, with deposits of 25-40%, than first-time buyers loans with 90% LTVs . As a result, the buy-to-let sector is recovering at a remarkable rate.” Loans for landlords Buying to let Renting property First-time buyers Property Mortgages Housing market Patrick Collinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Not marrying a future monarch? Then how about a hen party in the woods that’s less camp and more camping Kate Middleton apparently had a very low-key hen party – just a quiet evening at home with a few friends. I’m getting married in June and had hoped I would be able to sidestep the event entirely. I’m not a fan of anything that might involve fancy dress. But somehow I found myself agreeing to test out Babes in the Woods, a new venture for hens that offers “Champagne camping with a touch of the wild!”, despite the fact I also dislike camping (too much work), organised fun – and exclamation marks. I suspect it was the promise of expensive alcohol, and the fact I could bring five unwitting friends. Things don’t start well. One of the girls turned 30 the day before and there has been a blurry evening of tequila in Soho, some very muddled late-night packing and a nauseating minicab ride to Paddington at the crack of dawn. Babes in the Woods is based in south Devon, just north of Dartmouth, and a three-hour train journey from London. The area is a countryside cliche – gently rolling hills dotted with newborn lambs, shady woodlands filled with bluebells – and, it turns out, a far better cure for a hangover than a sofa and a DVD box set. We are met by Hetti Dysch, the founder of BITW and a great one for bushcraft – which is a key element of the weekend. She quickly runs through some of the activities she and her partner, Pip Griffin, have planned for us – fire making, basket weaving. Before we can jump back into our taxi, she dumps our bags into a pick-up truck and takes us on a leisurely stroll towards the camp, with a lesson in foraging as we go. NB: primrose petals do not taste anywhere near as nice as they look. On the way we are told there are no showers, running water or electricity, which feels problematic until we get to the site, which is beautifully tucked away in a small patch of private woodland. Our sleeping quarters are comfy-looking camp beds inside a bell tent, our dining area is a large wooden bench in the middle of a clearing, and another bell tent contains an antique nightstand with mirror, china wash bowl and jugs of hot and cold water. A wood-fired sauna should be up and running by the beginning of May. The setup is charmingly rustic, and so it feels fitting that we have to pee in the bushes and use a compostable toilet for other matters. Well, fitting-ish. Despite a blackboard that has a timetable chalked on it (shelter building 3-5pm, champagne reception 7pm), Hetti and Pip make it clear that nothing should feel regimented. They are immediately likeable, keen to engage with us, but also good at leaving us to our own devices. The weekend has been carefully thought out – the activities are kept short, and everything is broken up with meals. We start with a lunch of nettle soup (who knew those stingers could be so tasty?), wild mushroom risotto, rainbow salad and several bottles of champagne. It is clear that we’re going to be well fed. And drunk, which seems the best way to tackle shelter making and is perhaps why we enjoy the afternoon activity so much, though I suspect there is also a pleasure in feeling some sort of connection to nature. The nearest any of us usually gets to that is watching grubby mice scurrying along tube tracks. We are surprisingly efficient at constructing something that withstands rain (I am forced to sit inside it while my friends throw water at me), though aesthetically it does look more like a serial killer’s lair than a Ray Mears survival shelter. As evening sets in, we drink more champagne, eat more food (chicken and new potatoes, followed by trifle), laugh at a lot of dirty jokes (I am convinced that six girls together descend far more quickly into toilet humour than six boys, or maybe we’re just very immature), and then the storytellers arrive. Now, if I had been asked before I went away whether I wanted someone reciting Sir Gawain and the Green Knight with accompanying songs on a guitar, I think it’s safe to say I would have declined. But here, there are times when it feels quite magical – a big crackling bonfire, pitch-black woods, so far away from anything we would normally be doing on a Saturday night – and times, as we try not to collapse into giggles, when it’s excruciating. Fortunately our storytellers, Nick and Ollie, seem to feel the same way, and their laughter rescues it from being horribly awkward. We spend the next morning each having a massage to the sound of birds and bleating sheep, and learning that Vaseline is a good fire-starter. There are complaints of being cold in the night, and while Hetti and Pip say they are going to invest in some thick blankets, it’s probably advisable to bring thermals and a warm hat. Or a lot of cider, which worked for me. We finish the weekend with scones and clotted cream served on vintage tea sets. The package isn’t cheap – the least expensive option is £195 and that doesn’t include a massage or entertainment . Plus you have to provide most of your own booze, which along with the train tickets does push up the price. But there was something very special, and very funny, about the experience. Usually when you meet up with your mates, it’s in a crowded restaurant or noisy pub, and the memories have been erased the next morning by the vodka shots from the night before. But I don’t think any of us will forget the sound of our friend screaming as she discovered a slug on her loo paper, after she had used it. Brilliant. • Babes in the Woods packages start with the White Willow, at £195 per person, which is suitable for groups of between eight and 20 hens, and includes all activities and meals, as well as the all-important camping for one night. Stays can be extended to two nights at a supplement of £35pp. A free “hen” place is offered per group booking of 12 and over confirmed before 31 October 2011. Babes in the Woods is operational between 1 March and 31 October. For more information visit babesinthewoods.co.uk . To book, call 020-7193 8633 or 07850 401759. Group trips United Kingdom Short breaks Weddings Royal wedding Monarchy Nicole Jackson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Fox talkers interview mom angry at Earth Day song; forget to disclose that she’s a Tea Party activist
April 22, 2011 No Comment
Click here to view this media Fox & Friends interviewed a well-spoken attractive mom this morning who was upset about her first-grader’s participation in an Earth Day program. The children had been taught a song with these lyrics: Recycle, bicycle, don’t you drive by yourself Don’t buy those plastic products on the supermarket shelf. Boycott, petition, let the big business know That if we mess it up here there’s nowhere else we can go. The question Fox talkers and their viewers all want to know: Are these kids being educated or indoctrinated? Rachael Proctor is an attractive, well-spoken woman. In fact, when I saw her interview I wondered if she worked in media somewhere in Tennessee, because she was obviously quite comfortable in the interview with nice, clip-worthy answers at the ready for the questions tossed at her. As it turns out, she does work in media. As the communications director for Tea Party candidate Donn Janes in 2010, she wrote press releases like this one . She also co-hosts a Tea Party radio show with Mark Herr ( FreedomWorks member page ) for the Mid-South Tea Party, and is the President of HelpingOurWarriors.org , a non-profit organization “supported by the generous contributions of individuals, corporations and foundations.” On the MidSouth Tea Party site, she is listed as a steering committee member . Here is her bio as published on the Helping Our Warriors site: As an accomplished realtor and retail manager, Rachael has many skills that are beneficial to Helping Our Warriors. She was a highly successful Realtor in the Phoenix metro area for 4 years. Prior to that, she worked as a manager in the retail industry. Currently, Rachael volunteers all her time as a community organizer with various local groups. She specifically volunteers on outreach and educational committees and is the event coordinator for an annual community Fourth of July celebration. In addition to her leadership skills, Rachael’s exuberance and outgoing personality are major assets for the Helping Our Warriors organization. As the President of our non-profit, Rachael’s responsibilities will include preparing agendas and presiding over executive board meetings, representing our organization’s interests nationally, fund-raising, event coordination, community outreach and office management. Helping Our Warriors is incorporated in Arizona . She is also signatory to a Tenth Amendment lawsuit over the Affordable Care Act ( PDF ). Now, all of this doesn’t mean she didn’t state her honest views in the interview. I’m certain she did. But don’t you think her associations are relevant to the story? Fox presented her as just “an outraged parent”, without mentioning that this particular outraged parent belongs to an organization funded in large part by a large corporation inside the plastics and pollution industries. That would seem to be relevant information if one purports to be presenting a ‘fair and balanced’ story about a parent objecting to what their child is being taught in school, no? Even if we remove the Koch associations, it really does matter that this person worked for a Tea Party candidate and has more than a passing association with them when discussed in the context of whether children are being “indoctrinated or educated,” particularly in light of the Tea Party’s attack on public education. This is why Fox is not news, should not be considered news, and in fact, is a shining example of indoctrination taking the place of education. Update: Oops, looks like Glenn Beck’s site (TheBlaze) picked it up with the same omission .
Continue reading …Fox talkers interview mom angry at Earth Day song; forget to disclose that she’s a Tea Party activist
April 22, 2011 No Comment
Click here to view this media Fox & Friends interviewed a well-spoken attractive mom this morning who was upset about her first-grader’s participation in an Earth Day program. The children had been taught a song with these lyrics: Recycle, bicycle, don’t you drive by yourself Don’t buy those plastic products on the supermarket shelf. Boycott, petition, let the big business know That if we mess it up here there’s nowhere else we can go. The question Fox talkers and their viewers all want to know: Are these kids being educated or indoctrinated? Rachael Proctor is an attractive, well-spoken woman. In fact, when I saw her interview I wondered if she worked in media somewhere in Tennessee, because she was obviously quite comfortable in the interview with nice, clip-worthy answers at the ready for the questions tossed at her. As it turns out, she does work in media. As the communications director for Tea Party candidate Donn Janes in 2010, she wrote press releases like this one . She also co-hosts a Tea Party radio show with Mark Herr ( FreedomWorks member page ) for the Mid-South Tea Party, and is the President of HelpingOurWarriors.org , a non-profit organization “supported by the generous contributions of individuals, corporations and foundations.” On the MidSouth Tea Party site, she is listed as a steering committee member . Here is her bio as published on the Helping Our Warriors site: As an accomplished realtor and retail manager, Rachael has many skills that are beneficial to Helping Our Warriors. She was a highly successful Realtor in the Phoenix metro area for 4 years. Prior to that, she worked as a manager in the retail industry. Currently, Rachael volunteers all her time as a community organizer with various local groups. She specifically volunteers on outreach and educational committees and is the event coordinator for an annual community Fourth of July celebration. In addition to her leadership skills, Rachael’s exuberance and outgoing personality are major assets for the Helping Our Warriors organization. As the President of our non-profit, Rachael’s responsibilities will include preparing agendas and presiding over executive board meetings, representing our organization’s interests nationally, fund-raising, event coordination, community outreach and office management. Helping Our Warriors is incorporated in Arizona . She is also signatory to a Tenth Amendment lawsuit over the Affordable Care Act ( PDF ). Now, all of this doesn’t mean she didn’t state her honest views in the interview. I’m certain she did. But don’t you think her associations are relevant to the story? Fox presented her as just “an outraged parent”, without mentioning that this particular outraged parent belongs to an organization funded in large part by a large corporation inside the plastics and pollution industries. That would seem to be relevant information if one purports to be presenting a ‘fair and balanced’ story about a parent objecting to what their child is being taught in school, no? Even if we remove the Koch associations, it really does matter that this person worked for a Tea Party candidate and has more than a passing association with them when discussed in the context of whether children are being “indoctrinated or educated,” particularly in light of the Tea Party’s attack on public education. This is why Fox is not news, should not be considered news, and in fact, is a shining example of indoctrination taking the place of education. Update: Oops, looks like Glenn Beck’s site (TheBlaze) picked it up with the same omission .
Continue reading …
Click here to view this media Brent Bozell and Sean Hannity, human pretzels. They have to be human pretzels to twist this conversation into what they did. It begins with the Paul Ryan budget and moves from there into the birther issue, one that Hannity has flogged mercilessly on every opportunity he possibly can. In a moment of faux media criticism, Hannity spreads the deck of recent birther stories spawned by his buddy Donald Trump, aided by Bachmann, Palin, and the rest of the wingnutosphere, then asks Bozell why, oh why it is that the media is so obsessed with the whole birther thing? Bozell’s response is worthy of the Most Intellectually Dishonest Twister Award of 2011. Maybe the entire decade. HANNITY: Media’s obsessed with it. Donald Trump kept saying in an interview with Stephanopoulis “I don’t want to talk about it, my campaign’s bigger than this, ask me about this, this and this” and seven times he interrupted him about the birth certificate issue. BOZELL: Sean, if you think conspiracy stories are important, let me give you one that’s even a hundred times more important. How about the suggestion that the President of the United States was complicit on the attack on 9-11? Remember all those attacks on George Bush? “Bush lied; thousands died?” That he deliberately got us into a war to profit from it from Halliburton? How about that as a conspiracy theory? Now this is a conspiracy theory that has been promoted by people like Rosie O’Donnell from ABC, and President Obama’s own green jobs czar Van Jones, who he himself has promoted this. Where are the media talking about those lugnuts? Where are the media exposing those whackjobs? They’re silent on it. But if a conservative says something, they’re all over it. So many twisters, so little time. Well, let’s begin at the beginning. The birther issue is once again in the forefront because Donald Trump and his minions have been flogging it for publicity. Sean Hannity was one of the first to step up and give him a platform to do exactly that. So if Hannity wonders why it’s such a huge big deal, I’d recommend he review his show tapes from the past 60 days or so on that “fair and balanced” network he works for. It’s once again a huge issue because there are a zillion stupid Republicans out there who actually believe this nonsense, and Fox News plays to them on a daily basis. Even Bachmann, when confronted with the actual document, could not do more than say “I take the President at his word”? WTF? The document was right there, why didn’t GSteph ask her to take the document at its word? No, no, that would kill the golden goose. Hannity’s golden goose. Let’s move on now to the truther issue, brought to us by Brent Bozell, and in particular, his smear of Van Jones, which was flogged by Hannity back in 2009, despite the fact that the signatories to that particular petition had been misled as to what they were signing. It was a smear job just like Shirley Sherrod’s smear job, and yet Bozell doesn’t hesitate to bring it up to continue to spread the perception that Van Jones is some kind of whacked-out conspiracy theorist, despite Jones’ apologies , which were conveniently left out. Remember now, Brent Bozell heads up the Media Research Center, ostensibly to keep media honest. What a joke. Let’s move on to the war “conspiracy theories”, which Bozell also shrugs off as “whackjobs”, while conflating truthers with those of us who believe the Iraq war was absolutely planned as a way to get access to Iraq’s oil fields. The truther theory and the Iraq war theory are separate and distinct. One is nonsense (truther); one is proven with government documents. Now he’s got a problem. Just this week, a British site reported the release of hundreds of memos showing that the plan was to tap into Iraq’s oil reserves after toppling Saddam Hussein. Since they have not published the documents and have a shaky reputation for journalism , let me offer up some other, more solid sites crowing over Iraq’s reserves. We have McClatchy in January, 2011 , crowing about the massive reserves being tapped. Also the Wall Street Journal in November, 2010. We have t his piece from Public Record in 2009, which quotes US government documents as saying this: The New Yorker ‘s Jane Mayer later made another discovery: a secret NSC document dated Feb. 3, 2001 – only two weeks after Bush took office – instructing NSC officials to cooperate with Cheney’s task force, which was “melding” two previously unrelated areas of policy: “the review of operational policies towards rogue states” and “actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields .” [The New Yorker, Feb. 16, 2004] By March 2001, Cheney’s task force had prepared a set of documents with a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as two charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and a list titled “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts,” according to information released in July 2003 under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch. No, no, no, Brent Bozell. You might have gotten away with the whine had you not actually tried to paint the lead-in to the Iraq war as a whackjob conspiracy theory. The evidence is insurmountable on that one, and on your pet theories, not so much. The sad thing is that all those faithful Hannity viewers actually believe this crap. Facts don’t matter when they’re getting all that ‘fair and balanced’ Fox News reporting.
Continue reading …
Click here to view this media Brent Bozell and Sean Hannity, human pretzels. They have to be human pretzels to twist this conversation into what they did. It begins with the Paul Ryan budget and moves from there into the birther issue, one that Hannity has flogged mercilessly on every opportunity he possibly can. In a moment of faux media criticism, Hannity spreads the deck of recent birther stories spawned by his buddy Donald Trump, aided by Bachmann, Palin, and the rest of the wingnutosphere, then asks Bozell why, oh why it is that the media is so obsessed with the whole birther thing? Bozell’s response is worthy of the Most Intellectually Dishonest Twister Award of 2011. Maybe the entire decade. HANNITY: Media’s obsessed with it. Donald Trump kept saying in an interview with Stephanopoulis “I don’t want to talk about it, my campaign’s bigger than this, ask me about this, this and this” and seven times he interrupted him about the birth certificate issue. BOZELL: Sean, if you think conspiracy stories are important, let me give you one that’s even a hundred times more important. How about the suggestion that the President of the United States was complicit on the attack on 9-11? Remember all those attacks on George Bush? “Bush lied; thousands died?” That he deliberately got us into a war to profit from it from Halliburton? How about that as a conspiracy theory? Now this is a conspiracy theory that has been promoted by people like Rosie O’Donnell from ABC, and President Obama’s own green jobs czar Van Jones, who he himself has promoted this. Where are the media talking about those lugnuts? Where are the media exposing those whackjobs? They’re silent on it. But if a conservative says something, they’re all over it. So many twisters, so little time. Well, let’s begin at the beginning. The birther issue is once again in the forefront because Donald Trump and his minions have been flogging it for publicity. Sean Hannity was one of the first to step up and give him a platform to do exactly that. So if Hannity wonders why it’s such a huge big deal, I’d recommend he review his show tapes from the past 60 days or so on that “fair and balanced” network he works for. It’s once again a huge issue because there are a zillion stupid Republicans out there who actually believe this nonsense, and Fox News plays to them on a daily basis. Even Bachmann, when confronted with the actual document, could not do more than say “I take the President at his word”? WTF? The document was right there, why didn’t GSteph ask her to take the document at its word? No, no, that would kill the golden goose. Hannity’s golden goose. Let’s move on now to the truther issue, brought to us by Brent Bozell, and in particular, his smear of Van Jones, which was flogged by Hannity back in 2009, despite the fact that the signatories to that particular petition had been misled as to what they were signing. It was a smear job just like Shirley Sherrod’s smear job, and yet Bozell doesn’t hesitate to bring it up to continue to spread the perception that Van Jones is some kind of whacked-out conspiracy theorist, despite Jones’ apologies , which were conveniently left out. Remember now, Brent Bozell heads up the Media Research Center, ostensibly to keep media honest. What a joke. Let’s move on to the war “conspiracy theories”, which Bozell also shrugs off as “whackjobs”, while conflating truthers with those of us who believe the Iraq war was absolutely planned as a way to get access to Iraq’s oil fields. The truther theory and the Iraq war theory are separate and distinct. One is nonsense (truther); one is proven with government documents. Now he’s got a problem. Just this week, a British site reported the release of hundreds of memos showing that the plan was to tap into Iraq’s oil reserves after toppling Saddam Hussein. Since they have not published the documents and have a shaky reputation for journalism , let me offer up some other, more solid sites crowing over Iraq’s reserves. We have McClatchy in January, 2011 , crowing about the massive reserves being tapped. Also the Wall Street Journal in November, 2010. We have t his piece from Public Record in 2009, which quotes US government documents as saying this: The New Yorker ‘s Jane Mayer later made another discovery: a secret NSC document dated Feb. 3, 2001 – only two weeks after Bush took office – instructing NSC officials to cooperate with Cheney’s task force, which was “melding” two previously unrelated areas of policy: “the review of operational policies towards rogue states” and “actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields .” [The New Yorker, Feb. 16, 2004] By March 2001, Cheney’s task force had prepared a set of documents with a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as two charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and a list titled “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts,” according to information released in July 2003 under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch. No, no, no, Brent Bozell. You might have gotten away with the whine had you not actually tried to paint the lead-in to the Iraq war as a whackjob conspiracy theory. The evidence is insurmountable on that one, and on your pet theories, not so much. The sad thing is that all those faithful Hannity viewers actually believe this crap. Facts don’t matter when they’re getting all that ‘fair and balanced’ Fox News reporting.
Continue reading …Tonight on the Fox News Channel: ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media’
April 22, 2011 No Comment
Tonight (Friday) the Fox News Channel will air a Hannity special, in Sean Hannity's usual time slot, ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.’ The promo declares : “Double standards? Groundless attacks? Blatant bias? Sean calls out the mainstream media! Don’t miss Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.” It will run for the hour at 9 PM EDT/8 PM CDT/7 PM MDT/6 PM PDT. It will re-run at midnight EDT/11 PM CDT/10 PM MDT/9 PM PDT. The Media Research Center made available to Fox News Channel producers video clips from our archive going back more than 20 years, so the program should feature a lot of examples of TV network liberal media bias from the past two decades. MRC President Brent Bozell was also interviewed for the special and should appear along with other conservatives who have battled or documented liberal media bias.
Continue reading …Tonight on the Fox News Channel: ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media’
April 22, 2011 No CommentTonight (Friday) the Fox News Channel will air a Hannity special, in Sean Hannity's usual time slot, ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.’ The promo declares : “Double standards? Groundless attacks? Blatant bias? Sean calls out the mainstream media! Don’t miss Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.” It will run for the hour at 9 PM EDT/8 PM CDT/7 PM MDT/6 PM PDT. It will re-run at midnight EDT/11 PM CDT/10 PM MDT/9 PM PDT. The Media Research Center made available to Fox News Channel producers video clips from our archive going back more than 20 years, so the program should feature a lot of examples of TV network liberal media bias from the past two decades. MRC President Brent Bozell was also interviewed for the special and should appear along with other conservatives who have battled or documented liberal media bias.
Continue reading …Tonight on the Fox News Channel: ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media’
April 22, 2011 No Comment
Tonight (Friday) the Fox News Channel will air a Hannity special, in Sean Hannity's usual time slot, ‘Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.’ The promo declares : “Double standards? Groundless attacks? Blatant bias? Sean calls out the mainstream media! Don’t miss Behind the Bias: The History of Liberal Media.” It will run for the hour at 9 PM EDT/8 PM CDT/7 PM MDT/6 PM PDT. It will re-run at midnight EDT/11 PM CDT/10 PM MDT/9 PM PDT. The Media Research Center made available to Fox News Channel producers video clips from our archive going back more than 20 years, so the program should feature a lot of examples of TV network liberal media bias from the past two decades. MRC President Brent Bozell was also interviewed for the special and should appear along with other conservatives who have battled or documented liberal media bias.
Continue reading …