Click here to view this media Sarah Palin thinks it’s all the media’s fault that there has been so much intraparty squabbling among Republican candidates so far — because they just want to make the GOP look bad. So of course, this then gave her leeway last night on Greta Van Susteren’s Fox show to launch into a nasty bit of payback directed at Newt Gingrich, who back in January warned Palin to “be more careful” with her words. From Lexis/Nexis : PALIN: I think the principles in the Republican Party are sound. The planks in our platform are great. The idiosyncrasies of some of the characters within the party are — you know, they are what they are. And the mainstream media really likes to capitalize on some infighting and some mistakes made within the party so they exacerbate it and make it sound worse than it is. But the planks and the platform are right for America. VAN SUSTEREN: Well, isn’t it our job, though, in the media to challenge the candidates, maybe put them in — I’m not talking about being personal, but I mean, really grill them on some of the things they say about policies, even perhaps even the missteps or at least what is later called a misstep because sometimes those are the true intentions or the true views and someone after 24 hours has sort of rethought it after getting some heat. PALIN: Absolutely. That is the media’s appropriate role in holding an official or a potential candidate — holding their feet to the fire, not playing the personal gotchas, but making sure that the record is clear regarding what it is that they say or the content, the context of what it is that they’re saying. Yes, that’s the media’s role. If the media doesn’t play that role, then they’re not a cornerstone of the democracy that we would like to believe that they are. VAN SUSTEREN: Do you think that the challenge that — in the last 24, 36 hours, or 48 hours, there’s been a challenge — Speaker Gingrich for what he said about Congressman Paul Ryan’s bill in terms of dealing with entitlements — do you think the challenge of him by the media and everyone going after him was right or wrong or someplace in between? PALIN: Well, I think that the media — that we all have a right to ask Speaker Gingrich, what in the heck did you mean that Paul Ryan’s budget plan is radical or social engineering? No, what is radical is not proposing a plan to counter Obama’s budget plan that has us on the road to bankruptcy. What Paul Ryan’s plan does — not only does it tackle the Medicare problems that are — we’re going to face just smack-dab in our face very shortly and allow for a safety net to be provided our seniors with health care coverage down the road, but Paul Ryan’s plan saves us $1.2 billion a day, as compared to Obama’s big government overspending, debt-induced budget plan that he’s rammed down our throats. VAN SUSTEREN: Yes, I thought it was sort of interesting, though, in this sort of whole exchange, I thought to myself, If I were Senator Rick Santorum, I would send flowers to Speaker Gingrich because Senator Santorum making the remark about your former running mate, John McCain, something about him not understanding or knowing torture and what — something — some reference to that because that’s a question — you never get near Senator McCain (INAUDIBLE) because he does know torture more than anybody else. I thought that he sort of — he was sort of unscathed as much as he could be, that the fuss over Speaker Gingrich overshadowed him. PALIN: You know what I thought after the whole Newt Gingrich thing in these last 24 hours, Greta, was, Bless his heart and every other good ol’ boy’s heart that’s in that political game there in the Beltway. They don’t really know any more than the rest of us. Greta, it was Newt Gingrich who told me in January of this year, Sarah Palin needs to slow down and really think through what it is that she has to say. Well, you know, he stumbles, too. We all stumble. We all have our strengths and our weaknesses. Of course, if the media report this little kick in the nuts to Gingrich, it’ll be their fault that voters might think there’s some infighting going on over there in Republicanville.
Continue reading …Facebook’s chief technology officer, Bret Taylor, was grilled by senators Thursday on the adequacy of the social network’s policy barring users under 13 years old after a recent report found that millions of children had Facebook accounts. “I want you defend your company here because I don’t know how you can,” Sen. Jay Rockefeller told Taylor during a Senate commerce subcommitee hearing on mobile privacy. Though Facebook’s terms of service prohibit children from using their site, the West Virginia Democrat questioned its efforts to verify users’ ages, citing a recent Consumer Reports study that estimated 7.5 million children had profiles on the social network. Rockefeller also expressed concerned about Facebook’s app, which Apple’s App Store describes as appropriate for all users over four years of age. “That’s actually news to me,” Taylor said of the app’s rating. “We don’t allow people to have accounts under the age of 13… Certainly your iPhone app has the same rules and conditions governing it as our website, which means that no one under the age of 13 can create an account.” “I appreciate that, but it doesn’t appear to be the truth,” Rockefeller responded. “You can’t just dismiss that seven-and-a-half million users are younger than 13 and say you have a policy that doesn’t allow that to happen,” he added later. Rockefeller recounted a conversation he had had with Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg in which she told him that the company had 100 people in place to supervise content posted by the site’s 600 million users. The West Virginia senator expressed strong doubts that such a small team could effectively prevent bullying and other abuses on the social network. “My reaction is, that is indefensible,” he said. “It’s unbelievable that you’d say that.” In an aside, the 73-year-old senator suggested that problems with Facebook’s privacy protections could in part be traced to the young age of its founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “It’s my general feeling that people who are 20, 21, 22 years old really don’t have any social values at this point,” said Rockefeller, noting that Zuckerberg started working on Facebook while a college student at Harvard University. “I think he was focused on how his business model would work and he wanted to make it bigger and do it faster than anyone else ever had, and nothing I know suggests otherwise.” Taylor noted that Facebook has instituted features, such as its Social Reporting tool, to allow users to flag content that violates the site’s policies and, when relevant, alert parents and teachers to the posts. “We work hard to protect individuals’ privacy by giving them control over the information they share and the connections they make. For Facebook — like other providers of social technologies — getting this balance right is not only the right thing to do, but a matter of survival,” Taylor said in his prepared testimony. That didn’t alleviate the concerns of Amy Guggenheim Shenkan, chief operating officer of Common Sense Media and another witness at the hearing. “Our view is there’s not enough being done,” she said, referring to the site’s measures to prevent underage users. “If we took a small amount of the time that any of these companies spend innovating products and start to think about how to protect kids and — frankly — adults, it would go a long way.” “These are organizations that have created a platform that 600 million people use across the globe… and instead of spending money to try to hire PR firms to try and take down the other company, let’s take that money and spend it on figuring out technological ways to protect our kids,” Shenkan explained, referencing the revelation that Facebook had paid a company to plant negative stories about Google in the press.
Continue reading …Any Android fans that envied Windows Phone 7′s Metro UI style can have it for their media player (the launcher has been done before , try Launcher 7 in the Market), thanks to this app released by the developer of the popular LauncherPro homescreen replacement. As seen in the video above next to a real WP7 device, the look and functionality of the Zune player is present in a remarkably full featured interface despite its early alpha status, complete with features like scrobbling and playlists. The only thing it’s really lacking so far is a name, and obviously any Zune software integration; while we wait to see if Microsoft has any reaction to this homage you can sideload the APK yourself from the source link. Update : If you want to see the same app running on Honeycomb (and looking amazing) check out a screenshot after the break. [Thanks @Basil_Knows !] Continue reading Windows Phone 7-style music player for Android arrives from the developer of LauncherPro Windows Phone 7-style music player for Android arrives from the developer of LauncherPro originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 20 May 2011 13:21:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …• Hit F5 or press the auto-refresh button for the latest news • Email your Warne memories to rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk • Read this delightful extract from The Spin • Read Mike Selvey’s lovely tribute to Warne • Buy Rob’s book, if you wish 5th over: Rajasthan Royals 37-0 (target 134; Watson 31, Dravid 5) The right-arm seamer Dhawal Kulkarni replaces Patel. There’s a shocking piece of running from the fourth ball, and Watson would have been run out by a mile had Harbhajan’s throw from near mid on either hit the stumps or gone into the keeper’s gloves. Instead Harbhajan yorked the keeper and the ball flew to short third man, which gave Watson time to get back. Five from the over. “On the topic of Warne, he was the reason I started watching cricket,” says Phil Sawyer. “I was a young, angry (well, slightly irritated) punk at the time, and thought cricket was a toff’s game. Then my sister pursuaded me to watch the first Test in the 1993 Ashes and he instantly mesmerised not only the English batting line up but me as well. So as well as thanking him for all the years of genius he’s treated us to (and even the years of pain he’s subjected us English supporters to), I must thank him for getting me hooked on the greatest sport in the world. Thanks, Shane.” I didn’t realise until earlier today that Warne also bowled against England on the 1990-91 tour. No prizes for guessing which poor bugger he dismissed . 4th over: Rajasthan Royals 32-0 (target 134; Watson 28, Dravid 3) Here’s Lasith Malinga, the tournament’s top wicket-taker by a formidable distance (he has 27; the next best is Munaf Patel with 17). Watson gets his off drive right this time, slamming it to the left of Malinga and away for four. Shot! Malinga’s response is a wonderful bouncer that smashes into the helmet. Watson, beaten for pace, had nowhere to go because the line was so good and tried to jerk his head away at the last minute, but it was too late and clattered into the grille. That was a storming delivery, and when Malinga digs in another short ball the unsettled Watson pulls it just over mid on for four. Terrific stuff. 3rd over: Rajasthan Royals 24-0 (target 134; Watson 20, Dravid 3) Just four singles from Patel’s over. Watson plays a couple of handsome off-drivers, but both go straight to mid off. That’s his weakness in Test cricket, not finding the gaps. Placement is a bit underrated in cricket. Who have been the great placers of the ball? I tend not to notice them, with the exception of Eoin Morgan. “Farewell performances are often such sad anticlimaxes,” says Rene Kita. “I remember watching the last game of Wayne Gretsky, ice hockey’s Bradman, and I came away thinking that Jaromir Jagr is God. I expect Malinga to do the same in this game. I’ve loved watching Malinga, but the most hilarious moment in this IPL was when Vinay Kumar bowled Chris Gayle with a precisely copied Malinga slinger. It’s great to finally SEE cricket even on a tiny screen instead of just reading about it. Now I know what a reverse sweep looks like and why you kept complaining about England’s use of it ca. 2006-2008. Looks really silly when it doesn’t come off.” Did I complain about it? I don’t mind the reverse sweep. I suppose I was a different man back then: younger, more hirsute, more sexual . And less tolerant of the reverse sweep, apparently. 2nd over: Rajasthan Royals 20-0 (target 134; Watson 18, Dravid 1) Harbhajan shares the new ball, and Watson flaps his third ball over midwicket for a huge six. That was an awesome shot because he didn’t hit it that hard; there was just a quick snap of wrists and the ball went flying. The next delivery brings a pretty big LBW shout when Watson pushes around his front pad, but there is a bit of doubt over both height and line so Paul Reiffel says not out. Harbhajan’s next ball is a stinker, far too short and hoicked over midwicket for six more. “I was at Trent Bridge in 2005 on day three,” says David Weston. “I had been looking forward to seeing Warney play. Wanted to be able to tell my grandkids I saw him weave his magic. I never got to see him bowl a ball, but I did get to see him play. He was out first ball to a short one from Simon Jonesl! Magic! Of course the Aussies then suffered the humiliation of having to follow on for the first time in a gazillion years! GLORY! Of course, the Aussies were slow to realise that they were facing the best bowling attack in the world. Fortunately for the Aussies sitting near me, I was on hand to tell them all about it. At length. I even had my Mum with me. How could things be better?” If you’d been playing the Goon of Fortune ? 1st over: Rajasthan Royals 8-0 (target 134; Watson 6, Dravid 1) This isn’t all about Shane Warne. It’s a very important game from Mumbai, who need to win one of their last two games to be sure of reaching the knockout stage. Munaf Patel gets them off to a poor start in the field: the first ball is a wide and the second is tickled off the pads for four by Shane Watson. A few singles complete a good over for Rajasthan. “I actually cheered when Warne took that wicket,” says Nath Jones, “and I’m pretty sure it’s the first time that I’ve been bothered enough about the IPL to do so.” INNINGS BREAK 20th over: Mumbai Indians 133-5 (Franklin 11, Harbhajan 1) Harbhajan pushes the penultimate ball to long on for a single. So Warne’s last ball will be to James Franklin. He takes it all in, eyes ablaze; then has a chat with Rahul Dravid to build the tension (“what are you having for tea tonight, mate?”), makes one fielding change for the road, trots in one last time – and his last ball is a full toss! Of all the things. Franklin bashes it down the ground for a single, and Warne ends with figures of 4-0-30-1. He shakes his team-mates’ hands on the way off, and the Mumbai Indians’ fielding coach Jonty Rhodes runs on to congratulate him. That’s a nice touch. The team want Warne to lead them off, but he’s having none of that. So that’s it. Crikey, we’ll never see Shane Warne bowl again. Still, we have 20 years of memories. Onyer, mate. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 131-5 (Sharma st Shah b Warne 58) Here we go. The first ball of Shane Warne’s final over… and Sharma is dropped! Who writes your effing scripts? Sharma smashes Warne high to long on, where Menaria drops a sitter. Then Warne treats us a rare googly; it turns a long way, and Franklin toe-ends it just over the head of the man at cover and away for four. Franklin pulls the third ball for a single… and then Warne gets his wicket! Sharma charged down the track, was beaten in the flight, and even let the bat slip out of his hand as he aimed a monstrous yahoo to leg. In fact the bat went miles. As dismissals, go, that was pretty emphatic: stumped while halfway down the track and with no bat in your hand. Warne has stripped many a batsman naked down tuhe years, but never quite like that, 19th over: Mumbai Indians 125-4 (Sharma 57, Franklin 5) It’ll be Botha to bowl the penultimate over, which means Warne is saving himself for last. Botha concedes only three singles from the first five balls, but then James Franklin blasts an excellent drive wide of long-off for four. And now, ladies and germs, it’s time for Shane Warne’s final over. “Well, it’s the end of an era isn’t it?” says Guy Hornsby. “I still get flashbacks to THAT ball, but probably not as many as Gatting does. What an entrance, and what’s even more impressive is that, unlike many other bright young upstarts before him, he really was the real deal. So many prospective greats that flashed then died out, but this man has been relentless over his whole career, seemingly able sometimes to get wickets by sheer force of will and an icy stare. He may have the social skills of an average bogan, and the teeth like a Ready Brek kid, but I’ll miss him. Baaawlinwaaaarrnnneeyyyy. (acutally, I won’t miss THAT).” 18th over: Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Sharma 55, Franklin 0) Watson ends with outstanding figures of 4-0-19-3. Remember he was seen as a bit of a joke cricketer? He certainly isn’t now. He is such an impressive cricketer, a shoo-in for a world one-day XI. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Pollard b Watson 20) A superb, boundaryless over from Shane Watson ends with a vital wicket when Pollard drags on an attempted drive. 17th over: Mumbai Indians 111-3 (Sharma 52, Pollard 18) Another spin bowler is on, the young left-armer Ashok Menaria. Pollard slices his second ball a trillion miles in the air, and Taylor fails to get his hands on a very difficult, swirling chance running back from cover. Having been reprieved, Pollard strikes the next two balls for four, a vicious smear down the ground and then a scorching drive through extra cover. Brutal. “Could I just thank (really REALLY thank) whoever forgot to invite a key inidividual to the aforementioned meeting (2nd over) meaning the meeting got cancelled and I’ve been able to leg it home in record time,” says Phil Sawyer. “The last time I moved that fast was when Millings invited me to join him in a male bonding session.” 16th over: Mumbai Indians 99-3 (Sharma 51, Pollard 7) Warne is back. He will enjoy the challenge of bowling to Kieron Pollard. I wonder if there’s a challenge he didn’t enjoy, and whether he ever felt cowed on a cricket field. Bowling to Tendulkar and Laxman, maybe, but then in Warne’s head the next wicket was always round the corner, even when the score was 971 for two. Warne’s first ball to Pollard is a grotesque long hop that Pollard blitzes this far wide of the non-striker Sharma’s face. It goes for a single, and Sharma cuts the next ball for four to bring up a superb half-century from only 36 balls. Just five singles from an excellent over. Warne has six balls left. 15th over: Mumbai Indians 94-3 (Sharma 48, Pollard 5) Another gorgeous stroke from Sharma. He gave himself loads of room outside leg, so Botha followed him, but Sharma was still able to flash the ball through extra cover for four. Nine from the over. “Very canny of Warne to have his own ending staged a day before the world ends,” says Ian Copestake. “If tomorrow is the Day of Rapture (go figure) then let today be the Day of Rippers.” 14th over: Mumbai Indians 85-3 (Sharma 41, Pollard 3) Rohit Sharma is the only man who has looked comfortable thus far, and he cuts Singh’s slower ball expertly wide of short third man for four. Two balls later, when Singh pitches short, Sharma pings a mighty six over square leg when Singh pitches short. That was a stunning shot, a dramatic whirl of the arms that sent the ball flying over the rope. Sharma has 41 from 30 balls; the rest have 41 from 54 between them. “Just wanted to add to the army of fans out there who will miss dear Warnie,” says Clare Davies. “And is it true that his teeth can be seen from outer space?” 13th over: Mumbai Indians 70-3 (Sharma 28, Pollard 1) Warne has replaced himself with Botha. Four from the over. In other news, remember how depressing it was, back in the day, when England were always duffed up by Australia A? The reverse is happening now . “I did have some memories of Warney,” says Luke Dealtry, “but then I saw this picture from yesterday , and they all seem to have disappeared. What is he?” He’s Shane Warne. That’s his job. 12th over: Mumbai Indians 66-3 (Sharma 26, Pollard 0) “Since I came into cricket only a couple of years ago, my memories of Warne are Portrait-of-Dorian-Grey-ish,” says Sara Torvalds. “One moment he is bowling that ball to Gatting, a single YouTube-click later he is, well, not quite so young or well-trained, nor quite as natural in colour; a very colourful carreer strangely compressed into one afternoon of googling.” WICKET! Mumbai Indians 65-3 (Tendulkar c Watson b Singh 31) Tendulkar has gone, caught at third man. He tried to uppercut a short ball from the new bowler Amit Singh and could only slice it straight to Shane Watson. For a couple of seconds, Mumbai is almost silent. That was an odd innings from Tendulkar, who could have been out of a few times. But on this awkward pitch, those 31 runs are vital. 11th over: Mumbai Indians 61-2 (Tendulkar 27, Sharma 25) A lucky escape for Tendulkar, who tries to pull Warne over midwicket and ends up clumping it back over the bowler’s head. The next ball is a beautiful slider, but Tendulkar’s hands are so fast and he manages to glide it to third man for two. Almost every other batsmen in the world would have been pinned in front. Warne is really enjoying himself, going through all the variations. The next ball is much slower, flighted invitingly; Tendulkar thinks about the big shot and then decides against it, defending respectfully to extra cover. Wonderful stuff. 10th over: Mumbai Indians 55-2 (Tendulkar 22, Sharma 24) Johan Botha replaces Trivedi and sneaks through a good over at a cost of just four singles. Tendulkar charged down the pitch to the last ball, but yorked himself in the process and just managed to squeeze an inside edge to short fine leg. Had he not done so he would have been stumped by a mile. “I was always amazed at Warne’s ability to contribute to a win,” says Gary Naylor. “Of his 145 Tests, he walked off a winner 92 times and lost only 26, some of which must have been dead rubbers. In his 194 ODIs, he was a winner 124 times, losing 65. How many times did the voice in his head tell him that he needed to make something happen and then he did just that? Because cricket is an individual challenge within a team framework, that ability is priceless – and nobody in the history of the game made more things happen than Warne. And if he had held that catch at The Oval in 2005, well…” The best example of that was the 1999 semi-final. Because of the finish, we sometimes forget Warne’s astonishing spell at a time when South Africa were cruising. 9th over: Mumbai Indians 51-2 (Tendulkar 20, Sharma 22) This is what we wanted: Warne bowling to Tendulkar. Warne drives his fingers through his hair, stops to think for a moment, trots in and bowls a very full delivery that Tendulkar squirts for a single. Warne fiddles with his field, doing what his instinct tells him, and is then worked into the leg side for consecutive twos by Sharma. Warne looks great. He has lost so much weight. He’s a great advert for dating one of the world’s most beautiful women. Or maybe he went on the Slim-Fast plan, like Barry Bethall. Later in the over he draws a leading edge from Tendulkar, which drifts just short of the man at short cover, and then Sharma clatters the last delivery through extra cover for four. An expensive over from Warne, 11 from it. 8th over: Mumbai Indians 40-2 (Tendulkar 18, Sharma 13) The right-arm seamer Siddharth Trivedi replaces Watson, and his fifth is cut crisply for four by Tendulkar. Beautiful stroke. Nine from the over. “Greetings from Brisbane where I’m about to start a 30 hour marathon home,” says Andrew Stroud. “Apart from Adelaide, stepping on his stumps at Edgbaston in 2005 is one memory, as is his running across the field to shake KP’s hand at the Oval after that century. A greatly feared opponent who will be sorely missed.” 7th over: Mumbai Indians 31-2 (Tendulkar 10, Sharma 12) Tendulkar survives another huge shout for LBW by Chavan. That almost looked extremely closed. Tendulkar rocked back and essayed a huge pull stroke, only to miss it completely, and Hawkeye suggested it would have hit a big portion of leg stump. It wasn’t as plumb as the first one, but it was still out. It looks like P.Satish Kumar was right. Tendulkar is all over the place. I bet he comes alive as soon as Warne comes on. Actually, in tribute to Warne, we should probably have asked you to text rather than email comments, shouldn’t we? Anyway. “Sorry, is Paul Reiffel, one time international team mate of Shane Warne, umpiring the game?” says Paul Wakefield. “Hardly seems fair.” You think that’s bad? The other umpire is Liz Hurley. 6th over: Mumbai Indians 26-2 (Tendulkar 9, Sharma 8) Danny Morrison persists with calling Sunil Gavaskar “Sunny G”, which makes him sound like some weird cross between a very, very, very, very, very orange drink and a long-haired smooth jazz saxophonist. Tendulkar has changed his bat; in the World Cup at least, that was about as ominous as when Gordon Greenidge started limping. He takes a single in that Watson over, and then Sharma slams a full delivery disdainfully over midwicket for a one-bounce four. “Warne has been brilliant in the IPL,” says P.Satish Kumar. “He has lit up the IPL like no other foreign player ever has. It is indeed sad to see him go. We Indians of course cannot be so over awed of his Test bowling mainly because his record against India has been generally modest but his impact on cricket is unquestionable. A true genius!! And Tendulkar was not given not out as per Law 74a. He was given not out as per Law 77a.sub-section.1.para-2: You never ever ever ever deny the viewing public a Tendulkar-Warne contest in Warne’s last game.” 5th over: Mumbai Indians 20-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 3) Chavan continues, and the new batsman Rohit Sharma works him for a couple to get off the mark, and then Tendulkar is beaten by another jaffa that spits pitches on off stump and spits past the edge. This has been an excellent start for Rajasthan, who hammered Mumbai earlier in the tournament . 4th over: Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 0) They’ve just shown an ING Direct advert, with Bumble doing the voice over! Brilliant. Bumble’s eccentric commentary cousin, Danny Morrison, is now in the box, and he starts by saying “Hello Sunny G”. I think I’m a little obsessed with Danny Morrison, and particuarly the way he ran domly em phasises parts of words you don’t ex pect . Just three singles from Watson’s second over. “Don’t forget Kevin Bloody Wilson’s tribute, ,” says Lord Selvey. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Rayudu c Taylor b Watson 2) Another one gone. Rayudu gets a leading edge towards cover, and Taylor runs back from the edge of the circle to take an excellent leaping catch. 3rd over: Mumbai Indians 14-1 (Tendulkar 7, Rayudu 1) Tendulkar is beaten by a peach from Chavan that turns sharply. Warne will enjoy bowling on this pitch. He’s currently talking about sledging Tendulkar. “We tried it in the mid-90s and he got about nine hundreds in a row, so I decided to befriend him.” Tendulkar gets his first boundary next ball, sweeping emphatically to deep backward square for a one-bounce four. “Some friends I’ve invented and I went to see the new leggy we’d heard about at a warm-up game on the Ball of the Century tour in ’93, and came away thinking he wasn’t up to much, because he’d just bowled stock leg-break after stock leg-break,” says Mac Millings. “Turned out he’d been keeping a few tricks up his sleeve. (The request was for Warne memories, not interesting Warne memories.) Hick mangled him in one of those games, didn’t he? 2nd over: Mumbai Indians 7-1 (Tendulkar 1, Rayudu 0) Warne’s in great form, chatting away to the commentators between deliveries but snapping right into focus for each ball. “Could I just thank whoever decided 4pm on a Friday afternoon was the ideal time for a meeting about exchange students, meaning that I’m going to miss Shane Warne’s last ever bloody match even though it’s available on free-to-air tv?” says Phil Sawyer. “Right, spleen vented. For now.” 1st over: Mumbai Indians 2-0 (Suman 1, Tendulkar 1) The slow left-armer Ankeet Chavan opens the bowling, and his first ball to Sachin Tendulkar brings a huge LBW shout that is turned down by Paul Reiffel. What was wrong with that?! The ball straightened sharply to hit the pad as Tendulkar missed a work to leg, and replays show it would have hit middle stump halfway up. Maybe Reiffel invoked the little-known Law 74a: never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever give Sachin Tendulkar out for a golden duck in India. “I’ve only seen Shane play once in the flesh: a one-day game for Hampshire,” says Matthew Brown. “He didn’t do anything spectacular with the ball, but I do remember one moment when he was fielding at slip. An ‘edge’ was taken, everyone appealed, and the umpire turned it down. The crowd booed mildly. And then, floating across the ground in an Aussie accent, everyone clearly heard the words: ‘We’ll get you next time, you bastard’.” Why was the umpire saying that? 3.28pm “Since you mentioned Simon Hughes, ” begins Ravi Nair. “May I ask if the delightful Isa Guha is also on the panel for ITV 4? It will make me run home the quicker.” The Guardian ‘s Isa Guha is not, I’m afraid, but this man is among the commentary team . That’s a good consolation, right? Oh. Now, if you have some spare cash and are not sure what to do with it, these are my bank details , you could do worse than sponsor my colleague Steph Fincham, who is riding through Sri Lanka in support of the Mines Advisory Group. Talking of bikes, I recorded a video of my morning BMX ride. What do you think ? Mumbai Indians have won the toss and will bat first. Mumbai Indians Franklin, Tendulkar (c), Rayudu (wk), Sharma, Pollard, Symonds, Suman, Kulkarni, Harbhajan, Patel, Malinga. Rajasthan Royals Watson, Dravid, Botha, Menaria, Rahane, Taylor, Shah (wk), Chavan, Warne (c), Singh, Trivedi. 3.05pm A nice description on ITV4 from Simon Hughes, who describes Warne as “cricket’s greatest conman”. And, as Graeme Hick says, it was almost impossible to play the ball rather than the man. Here’s a famous example of that, Nasser being sledged out in 1998-99 . 2.58pm Thanks to Andy Bradshaw for this link. Will you be Raptured ? 2.51pm ” You have to put a link to The Duckworth Lewis Method’s Jiggery Pokery ,” says John Stonestreet. “Just a perfect song inspired by that one very special delivery. Personally, my main memory of Warne’s bowling is actually Gilchrist after each delivery. ‘Aaww, wheeeel barlwed Shoine’ – sounded like a cat being strangled. This is a video I’ve wanted to see for years: the short spell in Colombo in 1992 that changed Shane Warne’s life. Australia, who trailed by nearly 300 on first innings, pulled off one of the great Test victories. If you’re not familiar with this staggering match, lose yourself in it quicksmart . Warne, who had a Test bowling average of 335 (!) after that first innings, took three quick wickets to win the match. Two Tests later he skittled West Indies with a second-innings seven-for, including that legendary flipper to Richie Richardson , and a star was born. A Warne memory from Harkarn Sumal “I had the dubious privilege of sitting in the Radcliffe Road End at Trent Bridge in 2005 on the fourth and final day of the fourth Test as England chased 130-odd to go 2-1 up in the series. The combination of my all-time biggest hangover (having been drunk to a standstill the previous night by my pal Becky in a game involving Connect 4 and Captain Morgan’s rum) and Warne’s mesmerising, strangulating, stifling, bullying spell – which nearly caused an ‘Adelaide’ before ‘Adelaides’ were even a recognised concept – left me feeling pretty much as uncomfortable as I ever have in my entire life. My memory may be playing tricks now, but I’m sure he had figures of 3-2-1-3 at one point. He certainly ended with figures of 13.5-2-31-4. It was horrible. And yet it was beautiful. The man is truly a dirty angel. Fair play to him for going out on his own terms, making bags of cash and getting a showbiz IPL stage on which he could muck about. I won’t say he was ‘class’, but he was certainly something else.” Lovely stuff, especially the phrase “dirty angel”. I’ve just had a look through the OBO of that run chase . Warne really could induce the sweetest terror. What’s your favourite Warne memory? Here are a few of his own, including that innocuous loosener to Mike Gatting in 1993. Preamble Hello. This is it, then. After 20 years, 1850 wickets, 3502 tweets , one costly diuretic and at least one comedy inflatable , Shane Warne will bowl his last ball in top-level cricket today. It is blithely said of all good and great sportsmen when they retire, yet with Warne we really can say that we will never see the like again. His Rajasthan Royals side cannot make the knockout stage of the IPL, but their opponents Mumbai Indians need a win from either of their final two games to confirm a place in the last four. Their captain is Sachin Tendulkar, one of the few players to master Warne . Even Rajasthan fans might be praying that Tendulkar does not fall to the new ball, just so we can see him face Warne one last time. Warne has never been a friend of authority, and there is something perversely appropriate about the fact that he is in the doghouse ahead of his last game. He won’t care. One of the things that defines Warne is the fact that, more than any other sportsman I can think of, he could not give a solitary one what anyone thinks. He will carry on doing what he likes, usually with that irresistible, rascally charm, and we’ll carry on watching. In an age of sporting automata he has been an old-fashioned superstar, warts and all. The main reason we love him, of course, is that he revived one of sport’s most beautiful arts. Not only did Warne revive leg spin, he also redefined it, taking its intrinsic element of deception to unimaginable levels. Watching him ease into a spell, working over the batsmen and the umpire, was the purest theatre. There has never been a better rogue psychologist than Warne – who, as we saw in The Miracle of Adelaide , could send batsmen round the bend at the thought of demons that didn’t even exist. There were plenty of live demons, too. Warne had all manner of deliveries; even if this wrong’un never really did master the wrong’un, there was still the flipper, the topspinner, the slider, the drifter, the zooter, the rooter, the tooter – not to mention hundreds of barely perceptible variations on his stock leggie. We won’t see them all today, as he has just 24 balls left to bowl. Cherish every single one. The game starts at 3.30pm . Shane Warne Cricket IPL Over by over reports Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …‘CD’, who is under a control order, is moved to the Midlands after allegedly trying to get weapons for a terrorist attack A leading figure in “a close group of Islamic extremists based in north London” must be moved out of the capital to protect the public, the high court has ruled. The dual British and Nigerian national, who is subject to a control order and can only be referred to as CD, has attempted to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, according to security services. CD was reported to have attended a training camp in Cumbria in 2004 organised by Mohammed Hamid , who was convicted of training terrorists for the unsuccessful 21 July 2005 London bombing . He had also undertaken extremist training in Syria in late 2005 and returned to the UK in April 2009. Mr Justice Simon backed the Home Office case that CD’s removal to an undisclosed address “in a Midland city” was necessary to prevent covert meetings with associates in London to plan attacks. CD was served with a 12-month control order in February following government assertions that putting him on trial risked revealing intelligence sources. He had voluntarily left London but was still free to return whenever he wished. Lisa Giovannetti QC, for the home secretary, said there had been several attempts to procure firearms from seven north-London-based criminal associates. CD had also shown “a very high level of security awareness”. John Burton QC, for CD, said his client had not denied his extremist Islamist views or his association with Hamid but had not been arrested in relation to his attendance at the Cumbria training camp. Burton said the London ban was having a “devastating” impact psychologically and physically and asked why it was necessary as CD was already subject to a large number of restrictions. Rejecting the appeal, the judge said: “CD has a background and training which would lead to a justifiably held fear that he would engage in terrorist-related activity.” That by itself did not justify his forced relocation but he had tried to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, had held covert meetings and there were concerns over “his ability to evade the attentions of those who have a duty to prevent him putting his plans into effect”. The judge said CD’s wife and two children were entitled to a travel allowance to visit him, but that did not mean such allowances should be made available in every relocation case. UK security and terrorism Control orders Terrorism policy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …‘CD’, who is under a control order, is moved to the Midlands after allegedly trying to get weapons for a terrorist attack A leading figure in “a close group of Islamic extremists based in north London” must be moved out of the capital to protect the public, the high court has ruled. The dual British and Nigerian national, who is subject to a control order and can only be referred to as CD, has attempted to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, according to security services. CD was reported to have attended a training camp in Cumbria in 2004 organised by Mohammed Hamid , who was convicted of training terrorists for the unsuccessful 21 July 2005 London bombing . He had also undertaken extremist training in Syria in late 2005 and returned to the UK in April 2009. Mr Justice Simon backed the Home Office case that CD’s removal to an undisclosed address “in a Midland city” was necessary to prevent covert meetings with associates in London to plan attacks. CD was served with a 12-month control order in February following government assertions that putting him on trial risked revealing intelligence sources. He had voluntarily left London but was still free to return whenever he wished. Lisa Giovannetti QC, for the home secretary, said there had been several attempts to procure firearms from seven north-London-based criminal associates. CD had also shown “a very high level of security awareness”. John Burton QC, for CD, said his client had not denied his extremist Islamist views or his association with Hamid but had not been arrested in relation to his attendance at the Cumbria training camp. Burton said the London ban was having a “devastating” impact psychologically and physically and asked why it was necessary as CD was already subject to a large number of restrictions. Rejecting the appeal, the judge said: “CD has a background and training which would lead to a justifiably held fear that he would engage in terrorist-related activity.” That by itself did not justify his forced relocation but he had tried to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, had held covert meetings and there were concerns over “his ability to evade the attentions of those who have a duty to prevent him putting his plans into effect”. The judge said CD’s wife and two children were entitled to a travel allowance to visit him, but that did not mean such allowances should be made available in every relocation case. UK security and terrorism Control orders Terrorism policy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …GPs and mental health charities report surge in demand in last year before tuition fee ceiling rises to £9,000 Unprecedented numbers of A-level students are seeking medical or psychological help to cope with exam pressures this year. Record competition for university places and uncertainty over whether some degrees offer value for money are making 16- to 18-year-olds in England more anxious than ever, doctors, psychotherapists and headteachers say. The Family Doctor Association, which represents GPs in more than 1,000 surgeries, and the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, which represents 32,000 specialists, said their members had noticed a rise this year in the number of 16- to 18-year-olds they had treated for exam-related stress. YoungMinds, a mental health charity, said that this year, 39% of the nearly 900 calls they had taken from 16- and 17-year-olds were about exam anxiety, compared with 27% last year. Most were from high-achieving teenagers in affluent families who “put enormous pressure on themselves to succeed”, the charity said. Lucie Russell, director of campaigns, policy and participation at the charity, said there had also been a surge in calls from parents worried their children were “under intolerable pressure”. Russell said: “We are sitting on a mental health timebomb and the more we put young people under extreme pressure to achieve academically, the more we are storing up problems in adulthood that will cost us dearly in NHS and social care costs.” Headteachers said their A-level students were under unprecedented pressure to obtain their grades for university. Stephen Sheedy, principal of Queen Mary’s sixth-form college in Basingstoke, said he had seen a “significant” rise in the number of pupils on prescribed medication to tackle anxiety. Tim Hands, master of Magdalen College independent school in Oxford, said he feared the stress would make young people more likely to burn out and develop psychological problems later in life. Jo Cookson, head of sixth form at Shenfield high school, a comprehensive in Essex, said more pupils were asking the school’s pastoral care team for help to tackle exam-related anxiety. The warnings come as hundreds of thousands of sixth-formers sit their first- and second-year A-level exams. For those in their last year of school or college who have applied to start university this autumn, the results will matter more than ever. Some 583,501 applicants are chasing just over 400,000 places on degree courses. Those that miss their offers and decide to re-apply for the autumn of next year face paying back up to £27,000 over the course of their working lives for a three-year degree. Tuition fees rise from £3,375 to up to £9,000 next year, although it is only when students graduate and earn £21,000 or more that they must begin to repay them. Those that decide to go straight into work, rather than continue their studies, may also face disappointment. The number of jobless 16- and 17-year-olds has risen to 218,000, the highest since records began in 1992. Ian Bauckham, head of Bennett Memorial Diocesan school, a comprehensive in Kent, said pupils in their second year of A-levels were under more pressure than before. “They are under the impression, probably correctly, that the offers they are holding for university places are tougher than in previous years and … there is likely to be less room for manoeuvre after results come out for those who miss their offers by a small margin.” Sheedy said teenagers no longer looked to the future “with the confidence that their older brothers and sisters had. Young people are increasingly concerned about whether or not they will be able to afford higher education; whether or not they will be able to find a job on leaving school or university; and whether or not they will be able to afford their own place to live. In 30-odd years of teaching, I have never seen 16- to 18-year-olds so politicised, at least to the point of feeling that they are the recipients of a very unfair share of the cuts being made in public spending.” A-levels Mental health Students Young people Higher education Schools Health Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Website faces action after users purported to reveal name of player who allegedly had affair with model Imogen Thomas A footballer has sued Twitter after a number of the microblogging site’s users purported to reveal the name of the player who allegedly had an affair with model Imogen Thomas. The footballer’s legal team began the legal action at the high court in London on Wednesday, in what is thought to be the first action against the US social media firm and its users. The lawsuit lists the defendants as “Twitter Inc and persons unknown”. The latter are described as those “responsible for the publication of information on the Twitter accounts” in the court document, according to reports. Earlier this month, an unknown person or individuals published the names of various people who had allegedly taken out gagging orders to conceal sexual indiscretions on a Twitter account. The account rapidly attracted more than 100,000 followers. Twitter had not responded to a request for comment at time of publication. The lord chief justice, Lord Judge, on Friday said Twitter and its users were totally out of control when it comes to privacy injunctions and court orders. Although there was no mention of Twitter in Lord Neuberger’s long-awaited report on superinjunctions, published on Friday, Lord Judge said readers placed greater trust in the contents of traditional media than in those “who peddle lies” on websites. More details soon … •
Continue reading …Anton Hammerl’s family learn he was killed in April during attack when three other journalists were captured Anton Hammerl, an award-winning, British-based photographer who had been missing in Libya since early April, was killed during an incident in which three other journalists were captured, it has been revealed. Hammerl, who had joint South African and Austrian citizenship but lived in Surbiton, Surrey, had cut his teeth covering the township wars in South Africa. “On 5 April 2011, Anton was shot by Gaddafi’s forces in an extremely remote location in the Libyan desert,” Hammerl’s family announced on Thursday. “According to eyewitnesses, his injuries were such that he could not have survived without medical attention.” News of Hammerl’s death was given to his family by Clare Gillis and James Foley, two American reporters who were captured by forces loyal to the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, in a remote area of eastern Libya and released on Thursday. They had been given suspended sentences of a year in prison for entering Libya illegally. Gillis and Foley said after their release that they, along with Hammerl and the Spanish photographer Manu Brab, arrived at a rebel-held frontline early on 5 April. Almost immediately, the rebels were put to flight by an attack by pro-Gaddafi forces, including two Libyan military trucks which the journalists could see driving towards them. “It all happened in a split second,” Foley told the Global Post . “We thought we were in the crossfire. But, eventually, we realised they were shooting at us. You could see and hear the bullets hitting the ground near us.” Hammerl, who was closest to the pro-Gaddafi forces, dived for cover but was shot in the abdomen. Hearing him cry out, Foley asked: “Are you OK? “No,” was Hammerl’s only reply. “I thought instinctively that we were all going to get killed, so I jumped up to surrender and screamed that we were journalists,” Foley said. He added that the three surviving journalists had struggled with how to communicate the news of Hammerl’s death to his family. “We knew collectively that if we spoke about Hammerl’s death while we were detained, then we would be in greater danger ourselves. But now that we’re free, it’s our moral imperative to tell the story of this great journalist and father,” he said. The news of Hammerl’s death brings to an end weeks of uncertainty for Hammerl’s wife and young family who had heard contradictory reports from the Libyan authorities about what had happened to him, being first informed he was safe and being held and later that there was no news of him. A statement put out by his family read: “From the moment Anton disappeared in Libya we have lived in hope as the Libyan officials assured us that they had Anton. It is intolerably cruel that Gaddafi loyalists have known Anton’s fate all along and chose to cover it up.” South Africa’s foreign minister claimed on Friday that Gaddafi fed South Africa misinformation about Hammerl. Maite Nkoana-Mashabane said Libya had still not come forward with the truth. “We kept getting reassurance and misinformation throughout,” Nkoana-Mashabane said. Referring to Gaddafi, she said the assurances came “at one stage from himself, yes, to say that they are all alive and that they are well”. Hammerl began his career in photojournalism covering the violence in South Africa and was mentored byKen Oesterbroek, one of the key figures in the Bang Bang Club – a small group of photographers which documented the conflicts. A family friend, Bronwyn Friedlander said: “Anton was a deeply moral and talented human being who did not deserve to die this way. But he died doing what he did best, telling stories with his photographs of the most vulnerable people.” Karel Prinsloo, of the Associated Press, who started his career in photography in South Africa at the same time as Hammerl, also paid tribute to him. “There are people like me who go straight for the news as it happens in front of us, but Anton was a much more thoughtful photographer,” he said. “He wanted to know why things were happening and what it meant to the people involved. He was a thinking man’s photographer.” The chairman of South Africa’s National Press Club, Yusuf Abramjee, told the South African Press Association that Hammerl would be remembered as “an outstanding photographer and a good human being”. News of Hammerl’s fate follows the deaths of Chris Hondros and Tim Hetherington, who were killed in a mortar attack on 20 April in Misrata. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Africa Middle East South Africa Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Anton Hammerl’s family learn he was killed in April during attack when three other journalists were captured Anton Hammerl, an award-winning, British-based photographer who had been missing in Libya since early April, was killed during an incident in which three other journalists were captured, it has been revealed. Hammerl, who had joint South African and Austrian citizenship but lived in Surbiton, Surrey, had cut his teeth covering the township wars in South Africa. “On 5 April 2011, Anton was shot by Gaddafi’s forces in an extremely remote location in the Libyan desert,” Hammerl’s family announced on Thursday. “According to eyewitnesses, his injuries were such that he could not have survived without medical attention.” News of Hammerl’s death was given to his family by Clare Gillis and James Foley, two American reporters who were captured by forces loyal to the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, in a remote area of eastern Libya and released on Thursday. They had been given suspended sentences of a year in prison for entering Libya illegally. Gillis and Foley said after their release that they, along with Hammerl and the Spanish photographer Manu Brab, arrived at a rebel-held frontline early on 5 April. Almost immediately, the rebels were put to flight by an attack by pro-Gaddafi forces, including two Libyan military trucks which the journalists could see driving towards them. “It all happened in a split second,” Foley told the Global Post . “We thought we were in the crossfire. But, eventually, we realised they were shooting at us. You could see and hear the bullets hitting the ground near us.” Hammerl, who was closest to the pro-Gaddafi forces, dived for cover but was shot in the abdomen. Hearing him cry out, Foley asked: “Are you OK? “No,” was Hammerl’s only reply. “I thought instinctively that we were all going to get killed, so I jumped up to surrender and screamed that we were journalists,” Foley said. He added that the three surviving journalists had struggled with how to communicate the news of Hammerl’s death to his family. “We knew collectively that if we spoke about Hammerl’s death while we were detained, then we would be in greater danger ourselves. But now that we’re free, it’s our moral imperative to tell the story of this great journalist and father,” he said. The news of Hammerl’s death brings to an end weeks of uncertainty for Hammerl’s wife and young family who had heard contradictory reports from the Libyan authorities about what had happened to him, being first informed he was safe and being held and later that there was no news of him. A statement put out by his family read: “From the moment Anton disappeared in Libya we have lived in hope as the Libyan officials assured us that they had Anton. It is intolerably cruel that Gaddafi loyalists have known Anton’s fate all along and chose to cover it up.” South Africa’s foreign minister claimed on Friday that Gaddafi fed South Africa misinformation about Hammerl. Maite Nkoana-Mashabane said Libya had still not come forward with the truth. “We kept getting reassurance and misinformation throughout,” Nkoana-Mashabane said. Referring to Gaddafi, she said the assurances came “at one stage from himself, yes, to say that they are all alive and that they are well”. Hammerl began his career in photojournalism covering the violence in South Africa and was mentored byKen Oesterbroek, one of the key figures in the Bang Bang Club – a small group of photographers which documented the conflicts. A family friend, Bronwyn Friedlander said: “Anton was a deeply moral and talented human being who did not deserve to die this way. But he died doing what he did best, telling stories with his photographs of the most vulnerable people.” Karel Prinsloo, of the Associated Press, who started his career in photography in South Africa at the same time as Hammerl, also paid tribute to him. “There are people like me who go straight for the news as it happens in front of us, but Anton was a much more thoughtful photographer,” he said. “He wanted to know why things were happening and what it meant to the people involved. He was a thinking man’s photographer.” The chairman of South Africa’s National Press Club, Yusuf Abramjee, told the South African Press Association that Hammerl would be remembered as “an outstanding photographer and a good human being”. News of Hammerl’s fate follows the deaths of Chris Hondros and Tim Hetherington, who were killed in a mortar attack on 20 April in Misrata. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Africa Middle East South Africa Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …