Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 426)
Republican Rep. Rob Woodall keeping his government health care ‘because it’s free’

Click here to view this media Rep. Rob Woodall (R-GA) faced criticism this week when video was released of him telling a constituent that she should sponsor her own health care instead of using the government’s Medicare program. The Georgia Democratic Party released more video Wednesday from that same town hall event where Woodall explained why he wouldn’t give up his own government-funded health care program. “You take government-subsidized health care, but you are not obligated to take that if you don’t want to,” Democratic activist Ilene Johnson told Woodall. “Why aren’t you going out on the free market in the state where you are a resident and buy your own health care?” “It’s because it’s free,” Woodall replied. “It’s because it’s free. The same reason I went out to Walgreens and bought Activon when I don’t have any arthritis pain. Because it’s free. Folks, if you give people things for free, don’t blame them for taking them.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has a transcript .

Continue reading …
Minister approves nuclear waste dump near Peterbourough

Contaminated waste is expected to be transported to the landfill site at King’s Cliffe by road from Harwell in Oxfordshire The government has over-ridden local planning objections and pushed through a controversial scheme to allow 250,000 tonnes a year of nuclear waste to be dumped in a traditional landfill site in a Northants village. Residents said they were “shocked” that such a groundbreaking decision could be taken before the conclusions of a wide-ranging debate about radioactive safety after the Fukushima atomic plant crisis. But Eric Pickles, the secretary of state for communities and local government said that “the risk of actual harm from the development would be very low” and it should therefore be given the go-ahead. The decision at the site at King’s Cliffe, a village near Peterborough, could have significant implications for other areas where landfill is needed to deal with the large volumes of low level waste from the UK’s atomic industry. Britain’s only purpose-built low level waste depositary at Drigg in Cumbria is rapidly filling up and ministers decided last year that the law should be changed to allow traditional landfill sites to be used in some circumstances. There is another row in Cumbria after the Environment Agency gave the go-ahead last month for a permit to dispose radioactive waste at the Lillyhall landfill site, from the Sellafield nuclear complex. Augean, the waste management outfit, is expected to bring waste in to the East Northamptonshire site at King’s Cliffe by road from Harwell in Oxfordshire, which was established in 1946 as Britain’s first atomic energy research establishment. But local fears that the facility could also be used for waste created at other nuclear plants such as Bradwell in Essex. Planning permission had been denied by Northamptonshire councy council and a local referendum had damned the scheme but Augean appealed to the secretary of state saying the 250,000 tonnes would be mainly made up of relatively uncontaminated rubble and other debris. It argued that the facility has accepted hazardous waste without harmful effect on the environment or local economy. In a statement Augean said: “We are very pleased that our planning application has withstood the close examination of the inquiry and that the secretary of state has upheld our proposals for East Northamptonshire Resource Management Facility (ENRMF) His support joins that of the Environment Agency in allowing this important scheme to go ahead.” The company, with no prior experience of handling nuclear waste and which has been fined by the Environment Agency for past breaches of regulations, said it would work with local residents to further allay any concerns. But Clare Langan, a local resident and member of the campaign group King’s Cliffe Waste Watchers, said she was bitterly disappointed that the green light had been given to Augean. “In a post-Fukushima environment where nuclear planning is being halted in Germany and Japan it seems bizarre that the (UK) government is blundering ahead with disposing of nuclear waste in the most absurdly inappropriate place,” she argued. Louise Bagshaw, MP for nearby Corby told the BBC the decision undermined the government’s professed commitment to localism. “We had a local referendum at the ballot box, not a petition, actual votes cast and 96% of people were against this dump. I will be asking the secretary of state why his department has taken this appalling decision.” The decision got the thumbs up from the City though. Edison Investment Research put out a note on Augean saying this potentially lucrative waste business could “transform the economics within the group.” The decision by the Environment Agency to agree to radioactive dumping at Lillyhall by the Waste Recycling Group and its partner Energy Solutions has angered local residents and authorities there. Allerdale Borough Council, Copeland Borough Council and Cumbria County Council all objected to the scheme. “My fear is that this decision opens up the market for this waste to be disposed of wherever the best deal on costs is on offer, rather than factoring in the wider environmental and economic concerns,” said Tim Knowles, the councillor responsible for the environment at the County Council. debate about whether the region should host a national high level waste dump. The government desperately needs a solution to the high waste stored at plants around the country as it proceeds with plans for new nuclear facilities to generate low carbon electricity. Nuclear waste Energy Energy industry Nuclear power Waste Eric Pickles Local politics Local government Terry Macalister guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Twitter will notify users accused of gagging order breaches

Social network will attempt to protect users’ right to defend themselves in legal case brought by footballer Twitter will notify its users before handing their personal information to UK authorities seeking to prosecute them over alleged breaches of privacy injunctions, a senior executive at the company said on Thursday. Asked about the escalating dispute over gagging orders in Britain, Twitter’s general manager of European operations, Tony Wang, said: “Platforms should have responsibility not to defend the user, but to protect that user’s right to defend him or herself.” Twitter was thrown into the centre of the storm over privacy injunctions on Friday when it emerged a footballer launched legal action against the social network in connection with an alleged affair with the former Big Brother contestant, Imogen Thomas. This prompted the player to be named by even more Twitter users and on Monday Lib Dem MP John Hemming used parliamentary privilege to name Manchester United’s Ryan Giggs as the footballer behind the high-profile privacy injunction. The injunction remains in place . Speaking at the eG8 internet forum in Paris on Wednesday, Wang said he could not comment specifically on the ongoing UK legal action. “If we’re legally required to turn over user information, to the extent that we can, we want to notify the user involved, let them know and let them exercise their rights under their own jurisdiction,” he added. “That’s not to say that they will ultimately prevail, that’s not to say that law enforcement doesn’t get the information they need, but what it does do is take that process into the court of law and let it play out there.” Alexander Macgillivray, Twitter’s general counsel, later clarified the social network’s privacy policy. Macgillvray said on Twitter: “Our policy is notify users & we have fought to ensure user rights. Sadly, some more interested in headlines than accuracy. Twitter declined to comment further. Schillings, the law firm acting for the footballer, filed the legal action against Twitter and its users on Friday, after tens of thousands of internet users allegedly exposed details of his alleged extra-marital affair. The court order – known as a Norwich Pharmacal order – could force Twitter to hand over the name, email address and IP address of the person behind the account. Earlier this month, an unknown person or individuals published on a Twitter account the names of various people who had allegedly taken out gagging orders to conceal sexual indiscretions. The account rapidly attracted more than 100,000 followers. An injunction preventing the naming of the player still stands. Rejecting a third attempt by the Sun newspaper to lift the gagging order in the high court on Monday, after the player had been named in the Commons, Mr Justice Tugendhat said: “It is obvious that if the purpose [of the injunction] was to protect a secret then it would have now failed – but as it is to do with harassment it has not failed.” Privacy & the media Digital media Twitter Internet Blogging Superinjunctions Injunctions Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Milly Dowler murder suspect ‘disappeared’ on day of kidnapping

Levi Bellfield’s former partner tells murder trial of bouncer’s behaviour on day 13-year-old Surrey girl was snatched The man accused of murdering Milly Dowler disappeared on the day the schoolgirl was kidnapped, the Old Bailey has been told. Levi Bellfield’s former partner Emma Mills said she had tried to get hold of the 43-year-old nightclub bouncer but could not get through to his mobile phone. Mills, 33, said: “He disappeared. His mobile was off. I was trying to get in touch with him because I didn’t have any money and I needed to get some bits from the shop. Normally he would ring me or I would ring him, on and off during the day, to see what I was doing. He didn’t ring me at all until later on. I didn’t see him past lunchtime.” She said it was unusual for her not to be in contact with Bellfield, who was not working during the day at the time. She had a 40-second conversation with him at 5.38pm and a longer call later that evening, she said. “I don’t remember the actual conversation but I know how it probably went with me asking where he was all that time and when he was coming back.” Bellfield denies abducting and murdering 13-year-old Dowler and attempting to kidnap 11-year-old Rachel Cowles in March 2002. Dowler disappeared after leaving Walton-on-Thames railway station in Surrey to walk home along Station Avenue. The prosecution claims Bellfield was living yards away and murdered the girl in his flat before dumping the body. Six months later, her remains were found in woods 25 miles away. Bellfield, who also worked as a wheel clamper, was convicted in 2008 of murdering Marsha McDonnell, 19, and Amelie Delagrange, 22, and attempting to murder Kate Sheedy, 18. Mills said she met Bellfield at a club in Surrey when she was 18 and he was working on the door. She had moved into a flat in Collingwood Place in Walton-on-Thames with their two small children in 2001 and Bellfield had moved in by Christmas. The week Dowler vanished, the family were house-sitting for a friend in west London. Mills gave evidence from behind a curtain shielding her from the defendant in the dock. The court was adjourned briefly when she began crying after hearing Bellfield clear his throat twice. She told the court he returned to the friend’s house between 10 or 11 that night. He was wearing different clothes from those he had on in the morning. “I think he got a takeaway and some lagers. He had had a drink but he was not drunk,” she said. Asked if she had questioned him, Mills answered: “I did but I would never get a straight answer – and even if he did tell me something, I would never know if it was the truth.” When the pair returned to Collingwood Place the following day, Mills noticed something unusual in the bedroom: “There were no sheets or pillow cases on the bed. No duvet cover. I rang him. He said the dog had had an accident on the bed. I didn’t believe him for a second. I said, ‘Why would she do that, when did it happen?’ “He said he put the sheets in the rubbish because they could not be washed.” Mills said Bellfield’s Staffordshire bull terrier, Shy, would never have soiled the bed. When she looked in the bins outside the flat, she could see nothing, she said. The case continues. Milly Dowler Crime David Sharrock guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mark Haines Dies: CNBC Anchor Dead At 65 (VIDEO)

NEW YORK — Mark Haines, co-anchor of CNBC’s morning “Squawk on the Street” show, died unexpectedly on Tuesday evening, the network said. He was 65. The network said he died in his home. It did not specify the cause of death. Haines worked at CNBC for 22 years after working as a news anchor at TV stations in Philadelphia, New York and Providence, R.I. He was the founding anchor of CNBC’s “Squawk Box” morning show. In 2005, he started co-anchoring “Squawk On The Street,” a 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. show, with Erin Burnett, while “Squawk Box” was pushed to an earlier slot. Burnett recently left CNBC to host a general news show on CNN. CNBC President Mark Hoffman said Haines was “always the unflappable pro.” “He was an authentic voice in business media,” said Eric Jackson, who runs the hedge fund Ironfire Capital. “He resonated with so many people because he would speak out, and with opinion. Too often the media lets the corporate PR army and highly trained CEOs get their points across without question. He wouldn’t let that happen.” WATCH: Barry Ritholtz, head of the research firm Fusion IQ and frequent guest on CNBC, said Haines was “a no-nonsense straight shooter. He knew what questions to ask and how to ask them.” Ritholtz said that the biggest complaint about CNBC in the 1990s was that its anchors cheered on the stock-market bubble. He said the exception was Haines, who was always skeptical. “He was trained as an attorney,” Ritholtz said. “He brought that keen lawyer’s eye to everything he did. It wasn’t something often seen in the financial media.” Haines had a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania and was a member of the New Jersey State Bar Association, CNBC said. Haines is also remembered for calling a bottom to the stock market decline on March 10, 2009, his first call of the recession. The Dow Jones Industrial Average never closed below its level of March 9. Haines is survived by his wife, Cindy, his son, Matt, and daughter, Meredith. CNBC said funeral arrangements have yet to be made.

Continue reading …
Lady Gaga Eats Letterman’s Paper Notes: ‘Born This Way’ Star Gets Funny (VIDEO)

Here’s an incentive to buy the physical disc version of Lady Gaga’s new album, “Born This Way”: the liner notes may just be delicious. Gaga continued her media blitz on Monday, promoting her new album and discussing her egg-vessel on “The Late Show with David Letterman.” She gave a very spiritual answer to Dave’s question about the egg, saying, “It’s a place where I can meditate and experience rebirth, so I just get inside of it and close it, and then when I feel that I have been reborn spiritually, I just, whoo, come out.” Then, it was on to the issue of la femme Osbourne; or, eating Barbie doll heads while on stage, in the style of Ozzy Osbourne’s famed bat head diet. Before Letterman could even finish his question, Gaga proved her dietary courage, popping his ripped up notes in for a snack. Apparently, though, it didn’t quite have the flavor of her Barbies, or, of course, dresses. But hey, it’s one way Gaga can separate herself from Madonna. WATCH:

Continue reading …
Paul Ryan: Don’t Blame Me for NY-26 Loss! It Was Evil Democrats’ Demagoguery on Medicare

Click here to view this media Apparently Paul Ryan needed a place to come lick his wounds after the Republicans’ loss in New York’s 26th District special election loss last night, and the crew over at Morning Joe was more than happy to help him mend his bruised ego. Given Scarborough’s screaming tirade yesterday about greedy seniors who want to keep their Medicare being just like someone who wants to eat steak and chocolate cake every day, along with the months on end of fawning coverage of him he’s received on this show, Ryan had no doubt he was coming into friendly territory this morning. When asked about the loss, Ryan of course did not accept any of the blame for the Republicans’ loss there. It’s the Democrats’ fault for “demagoguing” the issue and of course on the independent “Tea Party” candidate being in the race — it had nothing to do with anger over the Republicans voting to voucherize Medicare. So don’t blame him, it was those horrible scary, untrue ads the Democrats ran that they all felt were just terribly unfair. They also gave him the full segment to lie about how people feel about his plan. According to Ryan, the voters are alright with his plan if they’re just given enough time to understand what it does. He also continued to pretend that it does not end Medicare as we know it. It privatizes it and all the happy talk in the world out of Ryan or this bunch isn’t going to change that. And Ryan’s claim — that since Medicare would still administer the program, it wouldn’t be drastically altered — is ridiculous. They showed the ad the Democrats ran showing a Ryan lookalike throwing grandma off of a cliff, which they laughed off as ridiculous since Ryan’s plan doesn’t affect those over 55 years of age, as though anyone under the age of 55 is not one day going to be that senior, or that those over the age of 55 don’t care what happens to their children and grandchildren. And of course what was missing from this segment? The largest drivers of our debt, which is those Bush tax cuts and our military spending. Heaven forbid we can’t talk about either of those. No, the elderly and the poor must be asked to sacrifice instead. Ryan and the crew on Morning Joe can continue to laugh off and dismiss what happened in yesterday’s special election. Let’s hope the voters in Wisconsin give them one less reason to keep laughing when they hold their recall elections this summer.

Continue reading …
Catholic scholars raise moral issues for Republicans like Boehner — so O’Reilly calls them immoral

Click here to view this media There’s an interesting dynamic beginning to play out recently on Paul Ryan’s budget by Catholic theologians and scholars against what I would call Catholic lobbyists — and having been raised Catholic, it’s a dynamic I’m familiar with. A group of Catholic academics spoke out against Rep. John Boehner, (who is also a Catholic) because he supports Paul Ryan’s budget plan, which will ultimately hurt the least of us — and as such, he’s violating important tenets of modern Catholicism. Here’s the cached version of the letter that was sent to Boehner and those that signed it: Mr. Speaker, your voting record is at variance from one of the Church’s most ancient moral teachings. From the apostles to the present, the Magisterium of the Church has insisted that those in power are morally obliged to preference the needs of the poor. Your record in support of legislation to address the desperate needs of the poor is among the worst in Congress. This fundamental concern should have great urgency for Catholic policy makers. Yet, even now, you work in opposition to it. The 2012 budget you shepherded to passage in the House of Representatives guts long-established protections for the most vulnerable members of society. It is particularly cruel to pregnant women and children, gutting Maternal and Child Health grants and slashing $500 million from the highly successful Women Infants and Children nutrition program. When they graduate from WIC at age 5, these children will face a 20% cut in food stamps. The House budget radically cuts Medicaid and effectively ends Medicare. It invokes the deficit to justify visiting such hardship upon the vulnerable, while it carves out $3 trillion in new tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy … read on You remember the phony outrage that was caused when right wingers went ballistic over President Obama being invited to speak at Notre Dame? It’s not surprising the the mainstream media hasn’t covered this at all. But when it’s the Catholic Bishops trying to screw up health care reform, it’s major news. As E.J. Dionne also observed about this media blackout, you didn’t hear many news stories coming out about this divide because it doesn’t fit with the Beltway’s usual narrative: And the story broke from the stereotypical narrative the media like to impose on Christians in general, and Catholics in particular. If the headline is “Conservative Catholics Denounce Liberal Politician on Abortion,” all the boilerplate is at the ready. But when the headline is “Catholic Progressives Challenge Conservative Politician on Social Justice,” this is something new and complicated. It’s far easier to write the 10th story of the week about Newt Gingrich. Catholics Anthony Stevens-Arroyo writes: Catholics challenge Boehner on faith and morals The exception, in a perverse way, was Fox News, which briefly last week tried to make a right-wing issue out of the story. Bill O’Reilly led the charge, and he came up with an unusual defense of Boehner (since he sides with the GOP) by calling the academics, gasp, immoral. O’Reilly: But to attack Speaker Boehner as an unfit Catholic is itself immoral because only God can make that judgment. The college professors protesting the speaker’s commencement address at Catholic University are making a blatantly political statement that has little to do with religion . Bill O’Reilly, a self proclaimed moral gasbag opinionator, made what he calls his own moral arguments against Dr. George Tiller, and eventually Tiller was murdered. See, everything for right-wing Catholics is tied to a woman and how they can control them. It’s as if nothing else matters, and that’s sad. Bill O also lies by justifying his own position against our social safety nets by saying that America is going bankrupt. Now I, your humble correspondent, am also Catholic, and I do support spending cuts because even though entitlement programs do some good, the looming bankruptcy of the country would harm far more people than the entitlements help. Oh, and if you thought those Catholic Bishops wouldn’t support Paul Ryan’s odious budget, guess again: Jonathon Cohen: The Catholic Bishop and the Devil Timothy Dolan, the Archbishop of New York and president of the Conference of Catholic Bishops, sent a letter on Wednesday to House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan. The subject of the letter was the House Republican Budget, which Ryan wrote, and it was part of an ongoing dialogue between the two men. Dolan’s letter did not endorse the Republican budget per se. But it praised Ryan for his attention to the Church’s values and, if you read the text, you can see why Ryan has (according to Politico ) been brandishing it as a signal of support Digby recaps how those same Catholic Bishops acted as a lobbying group for Republicans in their efforts to kill health car reform. Here’s the entire Bill O transcript: Bill O’Reilly: Controversy Over Boehner Speaking at Catholic University Speaker Boehner is set to give the commencement address at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., this Saturday. But 79 college professors around the country have signed a letter opining that Mr. Boehner is not upholding Catholic moral teachings. The professors say that because the speaker supports budget cuts that might impact poor people, including women and children, that he is “anti-life and not upholding Catholic theology.” Mr. Boehner himself is a Catholic and replied this way: (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) REP. JOHN BOEHNER, R-OHIO, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE: Like any religion, you will have some who are a little bit more liberal and some who are a bit more conservative. But I believe that the actions that I have taken during my years in Congress uphold the values of my faith. (END VIDEO CLIP) Now I, your humble correspondent, am also Catholic, and I do support spending cuts because even though entitlement programs do some good, the looming bankruptcy of the country would harm far more people than the entitlements help. The college professors are missing the essential point. The responsibility of the U.S. government is to protect all its citizens, and a bankruptcy in this country would devastate everyone. The cold truth of the matter is that our government simply cannot spend the amount of money it is spending. Everything has to be cut, including entitlements. That is not an immoral position. That is a responsible position because, again, if the economy collapses, everyone will be hurt. Now, many left-wing academics believe that raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations will cover the entitlement spending, but that is a canard. The enormous rise in Medicaid, Medicare and the looming Social Security disaster can never be covered by revenue enhancement. Never. All entitlements must be re-evaluated. There are ways to help the poor that don’t bankrupt us, and Catholics are compelled to help the poor. As you may know, “The Factor” gives millions of dollars to charitable causes. We have set up BillOReilly.com to do that because we believe those who have should help the have-nots. But to attack Speaker Boehner as an unfit Catholic is itself immoral because only God can make that judgment. The college professors protesting the speaker’s commencement address at Catholic University are making a blatantly political statement that has little to do with religion. And that’s “The Memo.”

Continue reading …
Marmite ban spreads consternation across Denmark

Facebook campaigners call for boycott of Danish bacon and urge rethink by Danish food officials Marmite fans in Denmark are planning a revolution against the authorities for banning the spread . Several groups on Facebook have already emerged in reaction to the ban imposed by the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration because the product is fortified with added vitamins. The groups include ” Eating marmite in Denmark because you’re a fearless bastard “, “Save Marmite in Denmark, Boycott Danish Bacon and Lego Now!! ” and ” Bring back Marmite in Denmark “. There is even an Expats Annual Marmite Day being organised, due to be held, if the page is to be believed , on 6 June. Founder Pat Kelly encouraged outraged Marmite eaters in the country to join forces and, presumably, eat extra Marmite on the allocated day. “Spread the word, but most importantly spread the Marmite,” wrote Kelly. “On every street in good old Denmark, show ‘em what they’re missing after they’ve banned this iconic product from our supermarket shelves! Make it a Marmite day everyday folks! Let the rise of the Marmite army begin!” But even on the page, opinion remained divided. A perplexed Ray Weaver wrote: “but… it’s horrible…” On the page calling for a boycott of Danish goods, fan Joe Figg feared the ban could have far-reaching consequences. “This dastardly move could bring about global warming of toast,” he wrote. While Mark Salisbury wrote: “Down with spread fascism!” Unilever, which produces Marmite, is weighing up its options to keep Marmite on Danish shelves. “We are sad to hear reports that our devoted fans may not be able to purchase Marmite in Denmark,” said a spokeswoman. “We’re looking into ways to ensure our Marmite lovers will not be left without their beloved spread. In the meantime we want to remind our fans in Denmark that they can still purchase Marmite from the Marmite shop – www.marmiteshop.co.uk”. She said the Facebook pages revealed a true love of the divisive savoury spread. “People are being very vocal and passionate about their favourite product,” she said. Denmark Europe Food & drink Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Labour opposes voice for anti-abortion group on sexual health forum

Yvette Cooper says appointment of Life organisation to panel raises question over ministers’ continuing support for abortion The Labour party has said that the appointment of a campaigning anti-abortion group to a new government advisory panel on sexual health raises concerns about whether abortion will continue to have support from ministers in future. The Life organisation , which is opposed to abortion in all circumstances and favours an abstinence-based approach to sex education, has been invited to join the sexual health forum, the Guardian revealed on Wednesday . The forum has been set up to replace the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV, which was abolished last year by Anne Milton, the public health minister. Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary and shadow minister for women and equalities, said on Wednesday: “Many women will be alarmed to hear that an organisation that campaigns against abortion in all circumstances is now advising the government. “Abortion is legal in this country but the appointment of this group raises a concern about whether that will continue to be supported by ministers in future.” She added: “We know that women don’t take decisions about pregnancy and abortion lightly. They will want reassurances from ministers that the appointment of this group does not signal a backwards step in independent advice, proper health support for women and safe access to abortion.” There has also been criticism of the government’s decision to omit the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) from the new forum, despite its long-term membership of the previous advisory group. The Department of Health has justified its decision on the basis that it was important that the forum represented “a wide range of interests”. However, news of the invitation to Life and omission of the BPAS has caused anger. Education for Choice , a pro-choice charity that provides education and training resources, used Twitter on Wednesday to “urge all those with interest in young people’s health to write to public health minster Anne Milton to express disapproval”. Lisa Hallgarten, director of Education for Choice, said that sexual health professionals had played a key role advising the government in improving sexual health services in recent years. Women have particularly benefited from developments including greater investment in contraception and improvements to abortion access, she said. “It is hard to see how an organisation dedicated to opposing provision of abortion would support these kinds of advances and our main concern would be that Life might seek to obstruct further advances in contraceptive and abortion access or even turn the clock back on some of them,” she added. But the move was welcomed today by the Conservative MP and pro-life campaigner Nadine Dorries, who won backing from MPs this month for a motion proposing that teenage girls must be given lessons in how to say no to sex. “The news that the government has ejected BPAS from the new sexual health forum and replaced them with the charity Life is pleasing, as it was the right thing to do,” she wrote on her blog. MPs voted 67 to 61, a majority of six, to let Dorries bring forward her bill, which would provide classes in abstinence for girls aged 13 to 16. It will receive its second reading in January, though it is unlikely to become law without government support. She added: “Journalists who have contacted me have asked the question ‘do you agree that this decision was taken quickly, as a result of the success of your 10-minute rule bill calling for abstinence to be included in sex education teaching’ and ‘do you think the government have been caught off guard by the amount of public support for your bill’? I have no idea, what I do know though is that it is a very good step in the right direction.” The MP has also tabled amendments to the to the health and social care bill to tighten the rules on terminations. The new sexual health forum also includes representatives from the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health, the Association of Directors of Public Health and the British HIV Association. Also on the panel are the Terrence Higgins Trust, sexual health charity Brook, the Family Planning Association, the Sex Education Forum and National Children’s Bureau. Abortion Health Women Sexual health Yvette Cooper Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …