Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 394)
Florida Homeowner Forecloses On Bank of America

Click here to view this media via WMFY, Greensboro. Instead of Bank of America foreclosing on some Florida homeowner, the homeowners had sheriff’s deputies foreclose on the bank. It started five months ago when Bank of America filed foreclosure papers on the home of a couple, who didn’t owe a dime on their home. The couple said they paid cash for the house. The case went to court and the homeowners were able to prove they didn’t owe Bank of America anything on the house. In fact, it was proven that the couple never even had a mortgage bill to pay. We’ve heard this story a thousand times before, haven’t we? So, how did it end with bank being foreclosed on? After more than 5 months of the judge’s ruling, the bank still hadn’t paid the legal fees, and the homeowner’s attorney did exactly what the bank tried to do to the homeowners. He seized the bank’s assets. “They’ve ignored our calls, ignored our letters, legally this is the next step to get my clients compensated, ” attorney Todd Allen told CBS. Sheriff’s deputies, movers, and the Nyergers’ attorney went to the bank and foreclosed on it. The attorney gave instructions to to remove desks, computers, copiers, filing cabinets and any cash in the teller’s drawers. After about an hour of being locked out of the bank, the bank manager handed the attorney a check for the legal fees. “As a foreclosure defense attorney this is sweet justice” says Allen. Sweet indeed.

Continue reading …
Royal Marine shot dead in Afghanistan

Soldier from 42 Commando Royal Marines died on patrol in Helmand, bringing toll among UK soldiers in Afghanistan to 370 A Royal Marine has been shot dead in Afghanistan as colleagues paid tribute to another serviceman who was killed “putting up a fight” against the enemy. The Royal Marine, from 42 Commando Royal Marines, was shot and killed on Sunday morning while on patrol in the Nahr-e-Saraj area of Helmand province. His next of kin have been informed. His death came two days after Corporal Michael Pike, 26, from Huntly, Aberdeenshire, was killed in the Lashkar Gah area after his patrol came under attack by insurgents armed with guns and rocket propelled grenades. A spokesman for Task Force Helmand, Lieutenant Colonel Tim Purbrick, said: “It is with great sadness that I have to announce the death of a Royal Marine from 42 Commando Royal Marines. “He was on joint patrol to meet local people and to disrupt insurgent activity in the Adensee area of Nahr-e-Saraj district in Helmand province when he was fatally wounded by small arms fire this morning. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and friends.” The latest incident brings the total number of UK military personnel who have died since operations in Afghanistan began in 2001 to 370. Pike’s colleagues, from 4th Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Scotland, said his quick reactions as he returned fire at the enemy saved lives. They described the father of two as the “epitome of a Highland soldier” who would not have wanted the other men to dwell on his loss. Pike, described as a “loving and caring family man”, leaves behind his wife, Ida, and two children, Joshua and Evelynn. His wife said: “My husband would want everybody to know that he died doing a job he loved and that he loved our children with all his heart and soul.” Pike, second in command of 2 platoon, A Company, based at Check Point Pegasus, was on his second tour of Afghanistan. He was leading the patrol in the area of Pupalzay along Highway 601 when it came under attack. He fired back on the enemy and his colleagues praised his quick reactions, which allowed them time to move out of danger. His platoon said in a joint statement: “He passed away doing the job he loved but he didn’t go down without putting up a fight. “He was suppressing the enemy in order to cover the lead wagon, the ground call sign and to allow other call signs to manoeuvre out of immediate danger.” Lieutenant Robert Grant, 2 Platoon commander, A Company, said: “The loss of Corporal Pike, one of the funniest, most life affirming and professionally diligent men I have ever had the privilege to meet, strikes deep into the heart and soul of all those who knew him. “An exceptional soldier and inspirational leader, Corporal Pike will be forever missed.” Afghanistan Military guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
French Open 2011 men’s final: Rafael Nadal v Roger Federer – live! | Katy Murrells

• Turn on the autorefresh button or hammer F5 for the latest • Email any musings to katy.murrells@guardian.co.uk • For more on the French Open click here Nadal 2-4 Federer* A rocket of a return from Federer gets it to 15-all. Nadal gives the line a fierce glare, before trudging over to serve again. He comes through to game to 30, finishing it off with a cross-court winner. Meanwhile Mick James is swearing at his TV: “Who is the BBC commentator who keeps saying “changeup” when he means “variation”? It’s so annoying, if this Wimbledon I’d suggest sending someone round to punch him.” Not sure Mick – I switched over to Eurosport when Sue Barker started flirting with Boris. Will get back to you on that one … *Nadal 1-4 Federer The longest rally of the match so far sees Nadal come out on top, 30-all. But Federer dismisses the danger by rattling off the next two points. He really couldn’t have asked for a better start. A few umbrellas go up on Philippe Chatrier, by the way. But thankfully they’re because of the sun rather than any imminent threat of rain. Nadal 1-3 Federer* At 30-all, Federer briefly thinks he’s brought up another break point with a forehand down the line, but the umpire overrules. Federer goes for another winner on the next point but miscues into the tramlines. Nadal gets his first game on the board, but he really hasn’t settled into this final yet. *Nadal 0-3 Federer Big serving from Federer. 15-0. 30-0. 40-0. 40-15. Game. What a start from apparently “fading” champion. And this from Matt Byron: “Is Nadal basically going to win this because of his fitness? He doesn’t seem as much of a tennis player as simply a human Duracell bunny, whose speed and power save him more often than his tennis abilities. For that reason, I think Federer is a much worthier champion. Even though he increasingly just looks like a faded star.” Nadal 0-2 Federer* Federer’s on the attack straight away, thumping a forehand drive volley and then forcing Nadal into an error. 0-30. Two points later and it’s 15-40. Two break points. Nadal saves the first with a great body serve and follow-up, and then Federer misses the second as he goes for broke on a forehand down the line. Deuce. Advantage Federer. Deuce. Advantage Federer. Nadal looks for all the world like he’s going to bury a short ball, but slams it into the net. Jeu and break Federer. And this from a slightly excited Gary Naylor: “Seeing the same individuals or teams in finals year-in year-out can get dull as familiarity breeds contempt. Doesn’t apply to these two though.” *Nadal 0-1 Federer (*denotes next server) Nadal sets out his tactics from the start, attacking Federer’s backhand in a lengthy exchange, but he goes long. An ace from Federer makes it 40-0, Nadal demands the umpire gets down from his chair to inspect the line but the call stands. Federer then dispatches a short ball to rattle through his opening service game to love. Tok, tok, tok, tok, tok, they’re warming up. Nadal is once again wearing his blue and white ensemble, Federer his red and white Swiss number. Not surprisingly, the Parisians sound quite up for this one. A few former champions are presented to the crowd, including Gustavo Kuerten and Jim Courier. And talking of former French Open champions, over on the BBC, Sue Barker is doing her best to flirt with Boris Becker. Meanwhile Federer will serve first. Here comes Roger. He does a quick interview in French, but the Eurosport translator comes to my rescue. Apparently Federer hopes things are going to be different to his previous French Open finals against Nadal and he’s out to do his very best. And here’s Rafa. He says it’s a big honour to play Federer and he’s looking forward to a really good match. And that’s about that. A weather update. British Eurosport are currently showing cycling and BBC Two seem more interested in the MotoGP, but according to Twitter at least the weather is holding at the moment, and there’s even a bit of sun. So we’re on for a 2pm start. Another name that can probably be added to the Team Federer list is Novak Djokovic. Should Federer win this afternoon, and prevent Nadal from equalling Bjorn Borg’s record of six French Open titles, Djokovic would be propelled to the world No1 ranking for the first time. If Nadal emerges victorious, he’ll keep hold of the top spot for another few weeks – at least until Wimbledon. In Nadal’s corner: Uncle Toni, Rafa’s girlfriend, probably a token Spanish sportsman or two. In Federer’s corner: Mrs Federer, coach Paul Annacone, the slightly scary Anna Wintour. Tale of the tape (well we do it for boxers, right?) Nadal-Federer 25 Age 29 6ft 1in Height 6ft 1in 13st 6lb Weight 13st 4lb 1 World ranking 3 45 Career titles 67 9 Grand slam titles 16 $40,052,402 Career prize money $62,497,310 16 Wins in past meetings 8 I think I’d rather sit on a sharp and rusty fence than call this one. Sure, Nadal’s the favourite with the bookies and rightly so, he’s priced at around 4-9 compared to Federer at 7-4. There’s no doubt he’s the better clay-court player, he’s only lost once at Roland Garros in 45 matches and has beaten Federer in the three previous French Open finals they’ve contested. But throughout this tournament it’s Federer who’s been playing the better tennis, and he produced the performance of the fortnight – and one of the best of the year so far – to end Djokovic’s unbeaten run. And having finally won the Coupe des Mousquetaires two years ago (after Robin Soderling accounted for Nadal in the fourth round), the pressure is off. For the first time against the Spaniard at Roland Garros, Federer can enjoy the occasion. And that might just allow him to pull off what would be, even by his standards, one of his greatest ever wins. Any thoughts? Ping them over on an email. Weather-permitting, play is due to get under way at 2pm BST. But the weathermen say there’s only a 20% chance of Roland Garros dodging the forecast storms this afternoon. Which could make it a rerun of the 2008 Wimbledon final. I doubt many would say no if it was. Afternoon all. So the ancien regime has been restored in Paris. For the first time since the 2009 Australian Open, and for just the second time since that Wimbledon encounter in 2008, it’s Roger versus Rafa in a grand slam final. Few at Roland Garros would have predicted this scenario a fortnight ago, when one bookmaker offered odds of 18-1 on Federer prevailing. The 29-year-old, down to No3 in the world and without a major final appearance in 16 months, was the half-forgotten man. All the talk was of Nadal and Novak Djokovic’s tussle for the No1 spot and whether Nadal could recover from back-to-back defeats to the Serb in the Madrid and Rome finals. But then Federer went and broke Djokovic’s 43-match, six-month stranglehold on the men’s game in a remarkable semi-final on Friday. “I wasn’t lying on the beach,’ said Federer after that match. “I continue to make sacrifices and, when it really counts, I’m at the big occasion. I have another opportunity here to beat Rafa and take another French Open title. I’m aware that I’ve got to play some extraordinary tennis, but I never stopped believing.” French Open 2011 French Open Rafael Nadal Roger Federer Tennis Katy Murrells guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Families rediscover French holidays as Arab spring and taxes take their toll

Journeys across the Channel are expected to be up 31% on last year as trips to US and North Africa fall out of favour For many Britons of a certain age, the charming towns, imposing chateaux and pavement cafes of France summon up cherished memories of first times abroad on a school exchange or a family holiday. In an era when long-haul flights were the preserve of the wealthy, a boat trip across the Channel was a welcome break for generations of holidaymakers. The lure of package tours to Thailand, the Caribbean and other far-flung destinations appeared to have changed all that; but les vacances en France are back. A combination of increased air taxes on long-haul flights, political instability throughout the Arab world and the recession at home have all contributed to a surge in the number of Britons booking Gallic breaks. An analysis of nearly five million British holiday bookings this year revealed a boom in travellers heading to Paris, the Loire valley and beyond. In total, 31% more tourists are expected to visit the country this year, compared with 2010. Carmen Konopka, editor of Destination France magazine, said the squeeze on incomes in the UK was a big factor. “People don’t have lots of money and it’s not expensive to get to France. You can pack your car and drive across from not much more than £30, which makes a big difference. I think there’s also a fear of flying at the moment with more ash exploding, so driving somewhere becomes more attractive. “And France is a fantastic destination. Lots of people will have been there as a child so it becomes a first love for many. Naturally, they get distracted by other destinations, but that first love is always there and parents often want to take their children to France for their first foreign adventure. “Then there is the sheer variety of holidays on offer,” said Konopka. “You can enjoy a beach holiday or something more sophisticated. You have mountain holidays, cycling or walking tours, and city breaks. Sure, there are expensive and luxurious places to go to, but there are lots of very good value places too.” The average price of a holiday in France this year is £554 a head, compared with £978 for Italy, which has seen a 15% rise in bookings. The steepest falls in bookings have been in Tunisia and Egypt, by 16% and 30% respectively because of the political uncertainty. More expensive destinations, such as the Caribbean and the US, at an average cost of more than £1,200, have also proved a turn-off in straitened economic times. France is the world’s number one tourist destination, with almost 80 million visitors last year – more than 10 million of whom were British. Philip Westerman, 30, from London, who has been to France “more times than I can remember”, puts food, culture and identity at the top of the list of reasons why he can’t stay away. “I went with my girlfriend and another couple to a place called Villentrois in the Loire valley recently for a long weekend and stayed in a pretty basic cottage, but that was part of the charm. “Cost definitely played a role. Flights were cheap – no more than a hundred quid for two – though our main reason for going was to eat and drink. We ate out a couple of times, but we were more interested in buying fresh local produce and cooking it ourselves. “We found a street market in a nearby town, which was easily as good as Borough Market in London. There was so much amazing cheese, cured meat, sausages and bread that we were in piggy heaven. We visited local vineyards and bought lots of wine that was cheap and unavailable in the UK. “I go for the food and authenticity of culture and, to get a little deep, the French can be seen as stubborn in their rejection of American culture, but it also means they have maintained their own identity, perhaps in a way that we have lost ours.” There is, however, one cloud on the horizon. There are mutterings of discontent among the 200,000 Britons who have a second home in France, as Nicolas Sarkozy proposes a property tax in an attempt to narrow the budget deficit. If it was implemented, the government would estimate the average rental income and charge each homeowner a 20% tax rate, which could force many in popular rural regions such as the Dordogne to sell. The draft, approved by Sarkozy’s cabinet last month, is expected to go through parliament in time to become law in 2012. France France Travel & leisure Paul Gallagher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Promising cystic fibrosis drug trial ends as the cash runs out

Plea for £6m to continue developing a pioneering drug, axed despite successful tests A pioneering British project that is on the threshold of developing a revolutionary treatment for cystic fibrosis is facing the axe. The setback is a desperate blow for thousands of young people who suffer from the incurable wasting illness. The £30m programme, involving a consortium of scientists from London, Oxford and Edinburgh, had reached the final stages of drug development but earlier this year ran out of cash. More than 80 scientists had been working for a decade on the treatment, funded by the Cystic Fibrosis Trust. However, the trust has suffered a recent slump in raising funds because of the recession. As a result, the consortium’s work has been suspended and unless a further £6m is raised by autumn, it will be abandoned. “We have developed a drug,” said Professor Eric Alton, the consortium’s co-ordinator. “We have carried out safety tests on it. We have found that the drug works very well in many patients. We have manufactured large numbers of doses of the drug. We have lined up 200 patients to take part in the final phases of trials. But now we have had to suspend operations because our money has run out. We are already laying off staff. It is horrendous.” This point was echoed by Katrina Dujardin, whose 12-year-old daughter Anna has cystic fibrosis. “It would have been disappointing if the project had failed. But that is not the problem. It has succeeded. We can see the science is there and that it works. However, we cannot now afford to go forward because of lack of finance and that is heart-breaking,” she said. Cystic fibrosis is caused by a mutant gene that prevents cells from producing healthy digestive juices, sweat and mucus. Individuals who carry a single copy of this gene are unaffected but those who inherit two copies – one from their father, one from their mother – suffer because their bodily fluids become thick, sticky and clog up lungs and digestive tracts which then become infected. Around 150 babies a year are born with the disease in Britain, including James Fraser Brown, the four-year-old son of Gordon Brown. Before the development of antibiotics, patients would die in childhood. Even today, few live beyond their 30s and survive only by going through long daily physiotherapy sessions, the consumption of dozens of vitamin and digestive enzyme tablets, and the constant use of antibiotics and asthma inhalers. When the genetic cause of cystic fibrosis was revealed in 1989, scientists realised it should be possible to put a healthy gene into patients’ cells so their bodies could start making healthy fluids. However, this work has proved to be intensely difficult and in 2001, the UK’s three main cystic fibrosis research groups – in London, Oxford and Edinburgh – decided to co-operate on a single, ambitious project. For its part, the Cystic Fibrosis Trust announced it was abandoning its commitments to fund support and care for patients in order to put its entire funding, raised through charity shops and collections, into the consortium. A total of £30m was raised and, after a decade of painstaking work, the researchers developed a form of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis that passed early clinical trials last year. “Those trials established the drug’s safety,” added Alton, who is based at Imperial College, London. “In addition, they showed that in many patients the ability to make healthy proteins was restored for several months and that was just with one dose. It was incredibly encouraging.” The consortium began work on a full trial involving 200 patients at the beginning of this year. Some patients would get placebos and others the full drug. “That would have finally proved the potential of the drug, I think. But before we could start we were told the money had run out,” added Alton. “We need another £6m to complete the project. If we got that money today, we could start the trial early next year. But we are already having to lay off staff and if we don’t get the money by autumn, we have to close down the entire operation. Everything we have achieved will have been lost.” Matthew Reed, chief executive of the Cystic Fibrosis Trust, agreed that an additional £6m was now needed to save the project. “We are pulling out all the stops to make it happen. We are trying to secure funding from the Medical Research Council and we are trying to attract new philanthropic gifts into the programme as well as reaching out to our existing supporters and community,” he said. Genetics Medical research Drugs Biology Health Robin McKie guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Labour plans £2bn bankers’ bonus tax to target youth unemployment

Ed Balls urges rebel Tory and Lib Dem MPs to back plan to fund back-to-work and house-building schemes Labour will attempt to lead a cross-party rebellion to enforce a new £2bn tax on bankers to fund a back-to-work scheme for jobless young people, the shadow chancellor Ed Balls said on Sunday. Balls is calling on rebel Tory and Lib Dem MPs to back the plan – an extension of a Labour tax on bankers’ bonuses – in a vote in the Commons later this month. It would provide £1.2bn for a house building scheme to provide low-cost homes and create 20,000 new jobs, £600m in payments to employers to take 90,000 more under-25s and £200m for unemployment “blackspots” around the country. It comes as a group of leading economists makes a major intervention, warning that Britain needs a plan B as an alternative to the coalition’s spending cuts , in case the economy becomes too fragile to withstand the shock of the deficit reduction programme. Those voicing concerns include two ex-senior government economists and two more who previously signed a high-profile letter last year supporting the Tory-led plans. Labour has made youth unemployment a priority in opposition. Balls, writing in the News of the World, said: “Putting young people on the dole is not just a waste of talent but a waste of money too. And failing to get Britain back to work fast enough is helping to push up the benefits bill by over £12bn – that’s £500 per household. “That’s why this week the shadow work secretary Liam Byrne and I will launch a new campaign for a £2bn tax on bankers’ bonuses which should be used to create 100,000 more jobs for young people, build more affordable homes and support small businesses. “Our plan will be put to a vote in Parliament – and we’re asking MPs from other parties to back it.” He also told Sky News: “We were told in the autumn by the chancellor and David Cameron that it would work and we are out of the danger zone and by cutting this fast … the private sector would be spending and investing more, confidence would rise, the economy would do well. I’m afraid the opposite is happening. Confidence is down and we’re now seeing week by week more evidence that the economy is stalling.” However, the foreign secretary William Hague said that the government was right to stick its course. “The government strategy is endorsed by the IMF, it is endorsed by the OECD, the G20, by all the major business organisations in this country and the harsh truth is that Gordon Brown did not leave this country with the luxury of a plan B or a different economic strategy,” he said. “We have to get down the debts that he left, control the deficits that he left and if we wavered from that for a moment then economic confidence would be reduced, the confidence of the financial markets would be very severely affected, so it is vital to continue on the course that we’ve cut.” “We’ve seen what is happening in Greece and Portugal and the last government left us with the same level of deficit as Greece and Portugal,” he added. Labour Ed Balls Unemployment Young people Executive pay and bonuses Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Fab

No Comment
Fab

Hurt Cog Drive YTHD.mov Délires sur Skype avec les AdN- : Episode 2 PeachykeenOrg says: @tearoomboutique Fantastic though think the Circus tour was better. Still a fab show though – wish I was there again!

Continue reading …
June 3, 1967 – Pick A Crisis – Any Crisis.

enlarge Credit: Boston Globe Roxbury. A love-ely Day in the neighborhood . . . Click here to view this media Looking for that June 3rd where things weren’t busting out all over, we came up woefully short with this one from 1967. Starting off with Soviet protests lodged against the U.S. for the bombing of a Russian Navel vessel where two seamen were killed. This hot on the tail of allegations the U.S. has been killing Russians like crazy in North Vietnam. And speaking of Vietnam – Operation Union 2 on the outskirts of Da Nang continued with reports of massive North Vietnamese casualties (we would hear about those lopsided casualty lists many years later). President Johnson and Prime Minster Harold Wilson meeting in Washington over the brewing crisis in the Middle East, centered around the Gulf of Aqaba and the relentless pounding of War drums in that region. The hand-wringing would do very little good because shortly after the famous Six Day War would break out. Reports of the Sixth Fleet playing hide-and-seek in the Mediterranean with two Soviet Spy Ships closely tailing. Red China calls for an immediate overthrow of the Hong Kong government. And why was that day any different than all the other days they called for an overthrow of the colonial Hong Kong government? Who knows. And only Mao did for sure. On the domestic front – A proposed merger between AT&T and ABC got a jaundiced eyeful from the FCC, an attempted land-grab in New Mexico (some 600,000 acres worth) didn’t come off according to plan and Mothers on Welfare ripped it up a bit in the Boston suburb of Roxbury over rumored cuts in Welfare funds. And an inch and a half of rain fell in less than 24 hours in San Francisco. Contrary to optimistic re-writes, the Summer of Love was rather soggy. All this and so much more via ABC Radio’s News Around The World for June 3, 1967. The perfect day for slathering on Patchouli Oil and forgetting about it.

Continue reading …
Mel Gibson: saint and sinner

On the eve of his movie comeback, can Mel Gibson finally tame his demons? It was a balmy spring evening in Cannes. Arriving for the premiere of his latest film, The Beaver , Mel Gibson seemed anxious as he walked the red carpet last month, a little uncomfortable posing for the massed ranks of photographers who were shouting his name. When the movie’s director, Jodie Foster, leaned across to adjust his bow-tie, Gibson smiled, right on cue. But while the two of them chatted and laughed for the cameras, the actor’s brow remained furrowed. The next day’s photographs would all show the three deep wrinkles cut horizontally across his tanned forehead, giving him the air of someone who expects disappointment and – more often than not – is rewarded with it. He was understandably worried, perhaps, about how the film would be received. The Beaver , in which the 55-year-old Gibson plays a depressed chief executive who communicates with his family through a glove puppet, is the first movie he has made since his inglorious public meltdown. Last July, Gibson became involved in a toxic public battle with his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his youngest child, the Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. Audiotapes leaked to an American gossip website purportedly recorded Gibson directing a series of aggressively foul-mouthed rants at Grigorieva, slinging racist and misogynist abuse at her. “You look like a fucking bitch in heat,” he shouted, his words slurred and imprecise. “And if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.” It was not the first time that Gibson’s temper and unreconstructed world view had been unpleasantly aired in public. In 2006, he was stopped for speeding by a police officer in Malibu. Gibson, who has a history of alcoholism, was driving with an open bottle of tequila in his car. His blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. As Gibson was handcuffed and put in the back of the police car, he launched into an unprovoked, antisemitic tirade in which he claimed that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”. A subsequent mugshot, released to the media, showed Gibson peering up at the camera with untidily gelled hair, unfocused eyes and an inane smile on his face, as though, even in police custody, the only role he knew how to play was that of the famous heart-throb who could get away with it. As it turned out, he couldn’t. Hollywood retribution to these two incidents was swift. After the first outburst, one studio boss suggested an industry boycott, the comedian Rob Schneider took out a full-page advertisement in Variety stating that he would “never work with Mel Gibson-actor-director-producer and antisemite”, while a mini-series on the Holocaust that Gibson had been developing with the ABC network was dropped. After the second outburst, a cameo part that Gibson had been slated to play in The Hangover II was withdrawn when cast members complained. It was an embarrassing fall from grace for the man who, at the pinnacle of his fame, produced, directed and starred in Braveheart , winning two Oscars for his efforts. There was a tangible sense that, even if no one said it out loud, the once bankable Mel Gibson was now box-office poison. “Apparently, very few people saw this side to Mel all these years,” says Paul Sylbert, a renowned art director who worked with Gibson on the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory . “There have always been antisemites in Hollywood but they keep it more or less to themselves. They don’t get drunk and start shouting at a cop.” Sylbert, who is Jewish, nevertheless says he thought Gibson was “terrific” to work with: “I liked him immediately. He was funny, pleasant, always on time, serious as a worker and as much a part of the crew as it was possible to be. He was playful, funny, like a little child with lots of energy. You couldn’t not like him. At the wrap party, I remember him coming round with a box of cigars, a whole assortment, and he was saying to everybody, ‘Smoke one!’ He couldn’t have been nicer. “He fooled me completely. I don’t think he looked at me as a Jew. I don’t think it entered his head. I think a lot of people like me were baffled by what happened.” Back in Cannes, Gibson was right to be worried about how his new film would be received by the audience. In the event, any fears were to prove groundless. As the credits rolled, the crowd gave The Beaver a 10-minute standing ovation. “The applause went on for so long, I actually began to feel uncomfortable,” says one of Gibson’s entourage. “It just wasn’t ending.” The day after the screening, any lingering interest over Gibson’s past misdemeanours was overshadowed by the Danish director Lars Von Trier claiming to be a Nazi at a press conference. The ensuing scandal conveniently shifted the limelight away from Gibson’s personal life. The Beaver has so far had a muted reception in the States. The reviews, too, have been distinctly mixed. Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian film critic, called it “laborious” and noted that Gibson failed to “project an underlying sympathy or charm in his character”. But Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times hailed it as “a reminder that [Gibson] is, after all, a superb actor”. Can Gibson make a comeback from the depths of public ignominy? “Yes,” says the film historian Peter Biskind. “Practically anybody in America can make a comeback [but] I don’t think The Beaver is going to be the film that does it.” For Biskind, Gibson’s volatility is what makes him “a great actor”. “There’s nothing new about that – most movie stars write their own rules and get away with it.” Gibson has been writing his own rules for longer than most. This is the man who, after becoming one of the highest-grossing actors in Hollywood (his movies, including the hugely popular Mad Max and Lethal Weapon series, have earned more than £1.2bn worldwide), decided to pour several million dollars of his own money into directing a 125-minute film of the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ. The Passion of the Christ , released in 2004, was told exclusively in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew and contained graphic violence. A 56-year-old woman had a fatal heart attack while watching the crucifixion scene in a cinema in Wichita. In spite of the gory subject matter and allegations of antisemitism in Gibson’s handling of the part played by the Jews in Christ’s death, the film was an unexpected hit and was nominated for three Academy Awards. It made £300m at the box office and catapulted Gibson into the ranks of the movie industry super-rich (because he had his own production company, Icon, he kept control of the profits). His private life, too, seemed atypically stable by Hollywood standards. Gibson, a lifelong Catholic, had been married to Robyn Moore, a former dental nurse, since 1980. The couple had seven children and split their time between two houses in Malibu, an Australian ranch and a Connecticut mansion. For a while, he seemed untouchable. But, six years after The Passion of the Christ , his wife had left him, his former girlfriend had accused him of punching her in the face and he was being publicly reviled as a racist, drunken bigot. What makes a man, seemingly at the height of his creative powers and popular success, risk everything in such spectacular style? And which Mel Gibson are we to believe in – the fresh-faced movie idol who once commanded £10m a movie or the angry drunkard spewing out his spittle-fuelled invective? The answer, according to those who know him, is both. “It’s Jekyll and Hyde,” explains a friend and colleague. “He can be the nicest guy one day: funny, supportive, kind. The next he can be dark and difficult. It’s not a mood swing exactly; it’s more that he has these two distinct personalities and you’re never sure what you’re going to get. On a bad day, he can be depressed, almost bipolar, and he can lose his temper. But on a good day, I’m telling you, there’s no greater guy.” According to Benoît Debie, cinematographer on How I Spent My Summer Vacation which stars Gibson and will be released later this year: “Mel is very intense. He can be both ways. Sometimes, he’ll be very strong and difficult with the crew; sometimes, he can be very nice and kind as well. It’s like there are two polarities.” As an example, Debie points to the fact that the film’s director, Adrian Grunberg, was hand-picked for the project after the pair worked together on Apocalypto , a Mayan action-adventure set in the Mexican jungle which Gibson had directed, with Grunberg acting as his first assistant. “Mel told him, ‘Write a script, I can produce and will act in it and you can direct it,’” recalls Debie. “It was very generous of Mel Gibson to help this young director like that. But at the same time he was quite hard with Adrian on set. Mel could be quite intense with him and sometimes very difficult, a bit overbearing. When Mel was in shot, he liked the camera to see his face. He didn’t want to be in the dark because he’s a legend, a movie star. He’s a good guy but he’s troubled.” Almost everyone I speak to seems to have a similar take: his friends and associates see him as a complex man, riven by contradiction, with a dark edge. And yet, on set, he is also the person who likes to play practical jokes and to defuse tension by simulating farting noises. When Ivana Chubbuck, a Los Angeles-based acting coach, first met Gibson at an Oscars party 10 years ago the two of them “spent hours talking about no matter how dark or dramatic a role is, it also has to have a sense of humour”. Chubbuck, who now counts Gibson as a friend, adds: “The real point about Mel is that he’s got edge, but he’s got it with humour. He’s not afraid to be self-deprecating, but he’s a risk-taker too and that underlying danger makes him interesting.” Perhaps the most surprising admission among those who have worked closely with him through the years is that no one can remember a single incident where Gibson was racist, antisemitic or sexist. It is genuinely hard to find anyone with a bad word to say about him. The majority of people I speak to are utterly mystified by what happened and remain staunchly loyal. Danny Glover, his co-star in Lethal Weapon , has spoken out publicly in support of his friend – “I love Mel… [he's] a very generous man” – and has stated that Gibson made substantial financial donations to anti-apartheid charities in South Africa. Alan Nierob, Gibson’s publicist of 25 years, is Jewish, as is Richard Donner, the director of the Lethal Weapon films and one of Gibson’s closest allies. Jodie Foster, an atheist, recently defended him in Cannes, calling him ” the most loved actor in Hollywood “, and Gibson’s ex-wife, Robyn, issued a sworn declaration insisting that he had never hit her during their 28 years together and was “a wonderful and loving father”. He is capable of grandiose gestures of kindness. While filming How I Spent My Summer Vacation on location in a prison in Veracruz, Mexico, Gibson learned that an elderly Mexican extra was suffering from cancer. “Gibson found him an alternative cancer therapist in Arizona,” says Biskind, who was told the story by a crew member. “He got him a visa by writing to the American ambassador and then flew him there. And this guy was Jewish! The director, Adrian Grunberg, is also Jewish. It just doesn’t compute.” “I’ve never seen him be antisemitic or racist, not at all,” says Kim Winther, who was first assistant director on The Patriot and We Were Soldiers , both of which Gibson starred in. “I never saw him lose his temper, not once. I wouldn’t even know what that’s like. He was always wonderful, open and great with my wife and kids.” Was Winther shocked when Gibson’s outbursts became public knowledge? “Yes. It was a shock to anybody that knew him.” Mel Gibson was born in 1956 in the industrial city of Peekskill, New York, the sixth of 11 children. His father, Hutton, was a railway brakeman until an injury forced him into early retirement. After appearing as a contestant on the American game show, Jeopardy! , Hutton won $21,000 and used the money to emigrate with his family to Australia in 1968, when Mel was 12. A zealous Catholic, Hutton Gibson went on to found the Alliance for Catholic Tradition, a group which issued several polemics in print, condemning the modernising influence of the Second Vatican Council. Over the years, Hutton has been quoted in the media making outspoken and frequently offensive religious statements – criticising the Pope for being too liberal, insisting heretics should be burned at the stake “as an act of charity”, and declaring that the Holocaust was mostly “fiction”. His son has refused to distance himself publicly from his father’s comments. According to Biskind, it is no coincidence that many of Gibson’s films “have an ongoing theme about an authority figure he’s rebelling against or who is his mentor”. Paul Sylbert puts it this way: “I think the motives for Mel’s outbursts go a lot deeper than people realise. First of all, it’s the love of his father who poured all that crap into him.” Growing up, Gibson was indelibly influenced by his father’s beliefs. As an adolescent, he considered becoming a priest before one of his sisters applied on his behalf to the National Institute of Dramatic Arts at the University of New South Wales. Gibson got a place and shared digs with Geoffrey Rush. He never graduated, but he landed the lead role in Mad Max in 1979 and then, two years later, gave a critically acclaimed performance in Peter Weir’s Gallipoli . Shortly afterwards, following his marriage to Robyn, Gibson went to Hollywood to pursue his film career. Although Gibson had remained true to the Catholic faith of his upbringing, the fast-living, heady excesses of Los Angeles in the 1980s proved something of a challenge. He became known as a good-time guy with a quick temper who liked a few beers, an impression aided perhaps by the immense popularity of Martin Riggs, his mischievously irreverent alter ego in the Lethal Weapon franchise. “He’s a guy who, in a bar brawl, would be one of the people fighting,” an unnamed actor was quoted as saying in a People magazine article last year. It was clear that he struggled with fame. Interviewed by this newspaper several years ago, Gibson said of that time: “Your life takes a dramatic change and you do not know how to handle it. There is no academy, no university that teaches you how to be a celebrity.” Concerns about Gibson’s drinking started to emerge when, while filming in Canada in 1983, he hit a car while under the influence and was banned from driving in Ontario for three months. Richard Donner recently revealed that Gibson would “drink a six-pack of beer before he got to work”. He became a loose cannon on publicity junkets. In a now infamous exchange with the Spanish El Pais newspaper in 1991, Gibson made a series of inflammatory homophobic comments. “They take it up the ass,” he said, pointing to his own rear end. “This is only for taking a shit.” He later apologised, claiming he had been drunk on vodka at the time. And yet, like many alcoholics, his drunkenness through the years was spliced with long bouts of sobriety, lucidity and creative energy. It seemed as though he fell into a cycle of intense bouts of work, followed by a conspicuous fall off the wagon resulting in public embarrassment, private shame and a substantial drying-out period, supported by his long-suffering wife. “He sobered up periodically,” says Sylbert, “but you can’t be half an alcoholic.” When he was sober, Gibson was extremely generous towards other people he encountered who were also struggling with addiction. At a party in 2001, Ivana Chubbuck recalls Gibson looking after Robert Downey Jr, who was then recovering from years of substance abuse: “Mel was there sponsoring him, making sure he was staying sober. He always had one eye on him. He is a nurturing soul.” (In fact, at a time when no studio wanted to cast Downey Jr because of the astronomical insurance costs, Gibson put up his own money to ensure he was cast in The Singing Detective in 2003). Gibson also counselled Britney Spears at the height of her public breakdown. Nor were his attentions confined to the rich and famous; Chubbuck remembers Gibson offering his guest house free of charge to a homeless musician until he got back on his feet. “He’s a very loyal and tremendously thoughtful guy,” agrees Kim Winther. “He takes care of pretty much everyone but himself.” Although he might have presented his best side to his friends and colleagues, others found him far less congenial. In an interview with GQ earlier this year, Winona Ryder recalled crossing paths with a “really drunk” Gibson at a Hollywood party in the mid-90s. “I was with my friend who’s gay,” she said. “[Gibson] made a really horrible gay joke. And somehow it came up that I was Jewish. He said something about ‘oven dodgers’. I’d never heard that before. It was just this weird, weird moment. I was like, ‘He’s antisemitic and he’s homophobic.’ No one believed me!’” It was, in many ways, as though Gibson were living a double life: there was the highly controlled professional who was never late to work… and then there was the man who said awful, insulting things when under the influence. As Gibson started to take on more demanding directorial projects, requiring increasing amounts of time away from home, the two lives collided. And his family life, for so long a stabilising influence, began to buckle under the strain. When filming began on Apocalypto in 2005, Gibson was on location in the Mexican jungle near Veracruz during which time the set was battered by heavy rain and hurricanes, meaning that the original eight-week shooting period overran to nine months. He hit the bottle again. “I’ve spoken to people on that shoot and I know it was very difficult because of the alcohol he was drinking,” says Benoît Debie. On his return to Los Angeles, Gibson found that Robyn had moved out of their Malibu home with the children. Shortly afterwards, he made his drunken, antisemitic remarks to a police officer. Unsurprisingly, his friends seek to explain – if not excuse – his behaviour in this context. “It was a drunken outburst to an officer who basically stopped his party and also probably saved his life,” says one close friend. Sylbert adds: “I think what happened is that under severe pressure, with his wife leaving him, his alcohol problems came back. At that point, he was loaded up with all sorts of personal problems. In vino veritas, all this anger comes spewing out, and because he’s a right-wing Catholic who believes the Jews killed Christ, it’s directed at them.” His new relationship with Oksana Grigorieva, a pouting Russian pianist 14 years his junior, did little to help. From the start, Gibson’s friends were unsure of her motives, dismissing her as a golddigger. In 2009, he funded and produced a series of music videos for her. One close friend, who has known Gibson for over 20 years, says he was “not remotely surprised” when audiotapes of the couple’s rows were leaked. “You just have to look at who’s involved and the money she wanted to get out of him,” the friend says, referring to Grigorieva, with whom Gibson now has a one-year-old daughter. Grigorieva’s spokesman declined to comment. “I think it started to go wrong when he met Oksana,” says Chubbuck. “It’s a horrible thing to record someone without their knowledge and of course she sounds rational [on the recordings] because she’s the one with the tape on.” But surely the things Gibson said were indefensible, no matter what the provocation? “Well, if I think of some of the un-PC things I said in anger, especially when there’s children involved, then all bets are off,” counters Chubbuck. Whatever the truth behind those tapes (for a time, Gibson’s lawyers claimed they had proof the recordings had been edited), the ugly public spat with Grigorieva seems to be abating. Last month, she dropped her charges of domestic violence against him after Gibson entered what is known as a “West plea” that enables a case to be settled without the defendant admitting guilt. “I ended it for my children and my family,” Gibson said in an interview. “I’ll take the hit and move on.” The couple now share custody of their daughter, Lucia. “He remains extremely close with all his children,” says a good friend. “They have a great relationship and Robyn has also remained very loyal and supportive through this time. He’s been sober for a year now.” And he is still, as Sylbert points out, extremely rich. “Whatever the settlement with his ex [Grigorieva] will be, it won’t make a dent in it,” he says. “He’s made oodles and oodles of money. He’s a compulsive worker, he’s designed that way.” Indeed, Gibson has several movie projects in the pipeline. As well as the forthcoming How I Spent My Summer Vacation , which tells the story of a career criminal who learns to survive jail with the help of a nine-year-old boy, he is set to start filming Love and Honour , a swashbuckling romp written by Braveheart scriptwriter Randall Wallace in the autumn. He also plans to return to directing. “I spoke to him a few weeks ago and he sounded very up,” says Winther. “He said all the bad stuff was a cross to bear but he was not letting it burden him. I got the sense he’s a man in control and he knows what he needs to do [and] the movie business is a business that forgives.” Will Gibson have the strength of mind to keep himself on the straight and narrow? Winther believes so: “He’s the kind of guy who never gives up.” It remains to be seen whether Hollywood, and the filmgoing public, will give up on him. Mel Gibson Lars von Trier Elizabeth Day guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mel Gibson: saint and sinner

On the eve of his movie comeback, can Mel Gibson finally tame his demons? It was a balmy spring evening in Cannes. Arriving for the premiere of his latest film, The Beaver , Mel Gibson seemed anxious as he walked the red carpet last month, a little uncomfortable posing for the massed ranks of photographers who were shouting his name. When the movie’s director, Jodie Foster, leaned across to adjust his bow-tie, Gibson smiled, right on cue. But while the two of them chatted and laughed for the cameras, the actor’s brow remained furrowed. The next day’s photographs would all show the three deep wrinkles cut horizontally across his tanned forehead, giving him the air of someone who expects disappointment and – more often than not – is rewarded with it. He was understandably worried, perhaps, about how the film would be received. The Beaver , in which the 55-year-old Gibson plays a depressed chief executive who communicates with his family through a glove puppet, is the first movie he has made since his inglorious public meltdown. Last July, Gibson became involved in a toxic public battle with his ex-girlfriend and the mother of his youngest child, the Russian musician Oksana Grigorieva. Audiotapes leaked to an American gossip website purportedly recorded Gibson directing a series of aggressively foul-mouthed rants at Grigorieva, slinging racist and misogynist abuse at her. “You look like a fucking bitch in heat,” he shouted, his words slurred and imprecise. “And if you get raped by a pack of niggers, it will be your fault.” It was not the first time that Gibson’s temper and unreconstructed world view had been unpleasantly aired in public. In 2006, he was stopped for speeding by a police officer in Malibu. Gibson, who has a history of alcoholism, was driving with an open bottle of tequila in his car. His blood-alcohol level exceeded the legal limit. As Gibson was handcuffed and put in the back of the police car, he launched into an unprovoked, antisemitic tirade in which he claimed that “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world”. A subsequent mugshot, released to the media, showed Gibson peering up at the camera with untidily gelled hair, unfocused eyes and an inane smile on his face, as though, even in police custody, the only role he knew how to play was that of the famous heart-throb who could get away with it. As it turned out, he couldn’t. Hollywood retribution to these two incidents was swift. After the first outburst, one studio boss suggested an industry boycott, the comedian Rob Schneider took out a full-page advertisement in Variety stating that he would “never work with Mel Gibson-actor-director-producer and antisemite”, while a mini-series on the Holocaust that Gibson had been developing with the ABC network was dropped. After the second outburst, a cameo part that Gibson had been slated to play in The Hangover II was withdrawn when cast members complained. It was an embarrassing fall from grace for the man who, at the pinnacle of his fame, produced, directed and starred in Braveheart , winning two Oscars for his efforts. There was a tangible sense that, even if no one said it out loud, the once bankable Mel Gibson was now box-office poison. “Apparently, very few people saw this side to Mel all these years,” says Paul Sylbert, a renowned art director who worked with Gibson on the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory . “There have always been antisemites in Hollywood but they keep it more or less to themselves. They don’t get drunk and start shouting at a cop.” Sylbert, who is Jewish, nevertheless says he thought Gibson was “terrific” to work with: “I liked him immediately. He was funny, pleasant, always on time, serious as a worker and as much a part of the crew as it was possible to be. He was playful, funny, like a little child with lots of energy. You couldn’t not like him. At the wrap party, I remember him coming round with a box of cigars, a whole assortment, and he was saying to everybody, ‘Smoke one!’ He couldn’t have been nicer. “He fooled me completely. I don’t think he looked at me as a Jew. I don’t think it entered his head. I think a lot of people like me were baffled by what happened.” Back in Cannes, Gibson was right to be worried about how his new film would be received by the audience. In the event, any fears were to prove groundless. As the credits rolled, the crowd gave The Beaver a 10-minute standing ovation. “The applause went on for so long, I actually began to feel uncomfortable,” says one of Gibson’s entourage. “It just wasn’t ending.” The day after the screening, any lingering interest over Gibson’s past misdemeanours was overshadowed by the Danish director Lars Von Trier claiming to be a Nazi at a press conference. The ensuing scandal conveniently shifted the limelight away from Gibson’s personal life. The Beaver has so far had a muted reception in the States. The reviews, too, have been distinctly mixed. Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian film critic, called it “laborious” and noted that Gibson failed to “project an underlying sympathy or charm in his character”. But Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times hailed it as “a reminder that [Gibson] is, after all, a superb actor”. Can Gibson make a comeback from the depths of public ignominy? “Yes,” says the film historian Peter Biskind. “Practically anybody in America can make a comeback [but] I don’t think The Beaver is going to be the film that does it.” For Biskind, Gibson’s volatility is what makes him “a great actor”. “There’s nothing new about that – most movie stars write their own rules and get away with it.” Gibson has been writing his own rules for longer than most. This is the man who, after becoming one of the highest-grossing actors in Hollywood (his movies, including the hugely popular Mad Max and Lethal Weapon series, have earned more than £1.2bn worldwide), decided to pour several million dollars of his own money into directing a 125-minute film of the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ. The Passion of the Christ , released in 2004, was told exclusively in Aramaic, Latin and Hebrew and contained graphic violence. A 56-year-old woman had a fatal heart attack while watching the crucifixion scene in a cinema in Wichita. In spite of the gory subject matter and allegations of antisemitism in Gibson’s handling of the part played by the Jews in Christ’s death, the film was an unexpected hit and was nominated for three Academy Awards. It made £300m at the box office and catapulted Gibson into the ranks of the movie industry super-rich (because he had his own production company, Icon, he kept control of the profits). His private life, too, seemed atypically stable by Hollywood standards. Gibson, a lifelong Catholic, had been married to Robyn Moore, a former dental nurse, since 1980. The couple had seven children and split their time between two houses in Malibu, an Australian ranch and a Connecticut mansion. For a while, he seemed untouchable. But, six years after The Passion of the Christ , his wife had left him, his former girlfriend had accused him of punching her in the face and he was being publicly reviled as a racist, drunken bigot. What makes a man, seemingly at the height of his creative powers and popular success, risk everything in such spectacular style? And which Mel Gibson are we to believe in – the fresh-faced movie idol who once commanded £10m a movie or the angry drunkard spewing out his spittle-fuelled invective? The answer, according to those who know him, is both. “It’s Jekyll and Hyde,” explains a friend and colleague. “He can be the nicest guy one day: funny, supportive, kind. The next he can be dark and difficult. It’s not a mood swing exactly; it’s more that he has these two distinct personalities and you’re never sure what you’re going to get. On a bad day, he can be depressed, almost bipolar, and he can lose his temper. But on a good day, I’m telling you, there’s no greater guy.” According to Benoît Debie, cinematographer on How I Spent My Summer Vacation which stars Gibson and will be released later this year: “Mel is very intense. He can be both ways. Sometimes, he’ll be very strong and difficult with the crew; sometimes, he can be very nice and kind as well. It’s like there are two polarities.” As an example, Debie points to the fact that the film’s director, Adrian Grunberg, was hand-picked for the project after the pair worked together on Apocalypto , a Mayan action-adventure set in the Mexican jungle which Gibson had directed, with Grunberg acting as his first assistant. “Mel told him, ‘Write a script, I can produce and will act in it and you can direct it,’” recalls Debie. “It was very generous of Mel Gibson to help this young director like that. But at the same time he was quite hard with Adrian on set. Mel could be quite intense with him and sometimes very difficult, a bit overbearing. When Mel was in shot, he liked the camera to see his face. He didn’t want to be in the dark because he’s a legend, a movie star. He’s a good guy but he’s troubled.” Almost everyone I speak to seems to have a similar take: his friends and associates see him as a complex man, riven by contradiction, with a dark edge. And yet, on set, he is also the person who likes to play practical jokes and to defuse tension by simulating farting noises. When Ivana Chubbuck, a Los Angeles-based acting coach, first met Gibson at an Oscars party 10 years ago the two of them “spent hours talking about no matter how dark or dramatic a role is, it also has to have a sense of humour”. Chubbuck, who now counts Gibson as a friend, adds: “The real point about Mel is that he’s got edge, but he’s got it with humour. He’s not afraid to be self-deprecating, but he’s a risk-taker too and that underlying danger makes him interesting.” Perhaps the most surprising admission among those who have worked closely with him through the years is that no one can remember a single incident where Gibson was racist, antisemitic or sexist. It is genuinely hard to find anyone with a bad word to say about him. The majority of people I speak to are utterly mystified by what happened and remain staunchly loyal. Danny Glover, his co-star in Lethal Weapon , has spoken out publicly in support of his friend – “I love Mel… [he's] a very generous man” – and has stated that Gibson made substantial financial donations to anti-apartheid charities in South Africa. Alan Nierob, Gibson’s publicist of 25 years, is Jewish, as is Richard Donner, the director of the Lethal Weapon films and one of Gibson’s closest allies. Jodie Foster, an atheist, recently defended him in Cannes, calling him ” the most loved actor in Hollywood “, and Gibson’s ex-wife, Robyn, issued a sworn declaration insisting that he had never hit her during their 28 years together and was “a wonderful and loving father”. He is capable of grandiose gestures of kindness. While filming How I Spent My Summer Vacation on location in a prison in Veracruz, Mexico, Gibson learned that an elderly Mexican extra was suffering from cancer. “Gibson found him an alternative cancer therapist in Arizona,” says Biskind, who was told the story by a crew member. “He got him a visa by writing to the American ambassador and then flew him there. And this guy was Jewish! The director, Adrian Grunberg, is also Jewish. It just doesn’t compute.” “I’ve never seen him be antisemitic or racist, not at all,” says Kim Winther, who was first assistant director on The Patriot and We Were Soldiers , both of which Gibson starred in. “I never saw him lose his temper, not once. I wouldn’t even know what that’s like. He was always wonderful, open and great with my wife and kids.” Was Winther shocked when Gibson’s outbursts became public knowledge? “Yes. It was a shock to anybody that knew him.” Mel Gibson was born in 1956 in the industrial city of Peekskill, New York, the sixth of 11 children. His father, Hutton, was a railway brakeman until an injury forced him into early retirement. After appearing as a contestant on the American game show, Jeopardy! , Hutton won $21,000 and used the money to emigrate with his family to Australia in 1968, when Mel was 12. A zealous Catholic, Hutton Gibson went on to found the Alliance for Catholic Tradition, a group which issued several polemics in print, condemning the modernising influence of the Second Vatican Council. Over the years, Hutton has been quoted in the media making outspoken and frequently offensive religious statements – criticising the Pope for being too liberal, insisting heretics should be burned at the stake “as an act of charity”, and declaring that the Holocaust was mostly “fiction”. His son has refused to distance himself publicly from his father’s comments. According to Biskind, it is no coincidence that many of Gibson’s films “have an ongoing theme about an authority figure he’s rebelling against or who is his mentor”. Paul Sylbert puts it this way: “I think the motives for Mel’s outbursts go a lot deeper than people realise. First of all, it’s the love of his father who poured all that crap into him.” Growing up, Gibson was indelibly influenced by his father’s beliefs. As an adolescent, he considered becoming a priest before one of his sisters applied on his behalf to the National Institute of Dramatic Arts at the University of New South Wales. Gibson got a place and shared digs with Geoffrey Rush. He never graduated, but he landed the lead role in Mad Max in 1979 and then, two years later, gave a critically acclaimed performance in Peter Weir’s Gallipoli . Shortly afterwards, following his marriage to Robyn, Gibson went to Hollywood to pursue his film career. Although Gibson had remained true to the Catholic faith of his upbringing, the fast-living, heady excesses of Los Angeles in the 1980s proved something of a challenge. He became known as a good-time guy with a quick temper who liked a few beers, an impression aided perhaps by the immense popularity of Martin Riggs, his mischievously irreverent alter ego in the Lethal Weapon franchise. “He’s a guy who, in a bar brawl, would be one of the people fighting,” an unnamed actor was quoted as saying in a People magazine article last year. It was clear that he struggled with fame. Interviewed by this newspaper several years ago, Gibson said of that time: “Your life takes a dramatic change and you do not know how to handle it. There is no academy, no university that teaches you how to be a celebrity.” Concerns about Gibson’s drinking started to emerge when, while filming in Canada in 1983, he hit a car while under the influence and was banned from driving in Ontario for three months. Richard Donner recently revealed that Gibson would “drink a six-pack of beer before he got to work”. He became a loose cannon on publicity junkets. In a now infamous exchange with the Spanish El Pais newspaper in 1991, Gibson made a series of inflammatory homophobic comments. “They take it up the ass,” he said, pointing to his own rear end. “This is only for taking a shit.” He later apologised, claiming he had been drunk on vodka at the time. And yet, like many alcoholics, his drunkenness through the years was spliced with long bouts of sobriety, lucidity and creative energy. It seemed as though he fell into a cycle of intense bouts of work, followed by a conspicuous fall off the wagon resulting in public embarrassment, private shame and a substantial drying-out period, supported by his long-suffering wife. “He sobered up periodically,” says Sylbert, “but you can’t be half an alcoholic.” When he was sober, Gibson was extremely generous towards other people he encountered who were also struggling with addiction. At a party in 2001, Ivana Chubbuck recalls Gibson looking after Robert Downey Jr, who was then recovering from years of substance abuse: “Mel was there sponsoring him, making sure he was staying sober. He always had one eye on him. He is a nurturing soul.” (In fact, at a time when no studio wanted to cast Downey Jr because of the astronomical insurance costs, Gibson put up his own money to ensure he was cast in The Singing Detective in 2003). Gibson also counselled Britney Spears at the height of her public breakdown. Nor were his attentions confined to the rich and famous; Chubbuck remembers Gibson offering his guest house free of charge to a homeless musician until he got back on his feet. “He’s a very loyal and tremendously thoughtful guy,” agrees Kim Winther. “He takes care of pretty much everyone but himself.” Although he might have presented his best side to his friends and colleagues, others found him far less congenial. In an interview with GQ earlier this year, Winona Ryder recalled crossing paths with a “really drunk” Gibson at a Hollywood party in the mid-90s. “I was with my friend who’s gay,” she said. “[Gibson] made a really horrible gay joke. And somehow it came up that I was Jewish. He said something about ‘oven dodgers’. I’d never heard that before. It was just this weird, weird moment. I was like, ‘He’s antisemitic and he’s homophobic.’ No one believed me!’” It was, in many ways, as though Gibson were living a double life: there was the highly controlled professional who was never late to work… and then there was the man who said awful, insulting things when under the influence. As Gibson started to take on more demanding directorial projects, requiring increasing amounts of time away from home, the two lives collided. And his family life, for so long a stabilising influence, began to buckle under the strain. When filming began on Apocalypto in 2005, Gibson was on location in the Mexican jungle near Veracruz during which time the set was battered by heavy rain and hurricanes, meaning that the original eight-week shooting period overran to nine months. He hit the bottle again. “I’ve spoken to people on that shoot and I know it was very difficult because of the alcohol he was drinking,” says Benoît Debie. On his return to Los Angeles, Gibson found that Robyn had moved out of their Malibu home with the children. Shortly afterwards, he made his drunken, antisemitic remarks to a police officer. Unsurprisingly, his friends seek to explain – if not excuse – his behaviour in this context. “It was a drunken outburst to an officer who basically stopped his party and also probably saved his life,” says one close friend. Sylbert adds: “I think what happened is that under severe pressure, with his wife leaving him, his alcohol problems came back. At that point, he was loaded up with all sorts of personal problems. In vino veritas, all this anger comes spewing out, and because he’s a right-wing Catholic who believes the Jews killed Christ, it’s directed at them.” His new relationship with Oksana Grigorieva, a pouting Russian pianist 14 years his junior, did little to help. From the start, Gibson’s friends were unsure of her motives, dismissing her as a golddigger. In 2009, he funded and produced a series of music videos for her. One close friend, who has known Gibson for over 20 years, says he was “not remotely surprised” when audiotapes of the couple’s rows were leaked. “You just have to look at who’s involved and the money she wanted to get out of him,” the friend says, referring to Grigorieva, with whom Gibson now has a one-year-old daughter. Grigorieva’s spokesman declined to comment. “I think it started to go wrong when he met Oksana,” says Chubbuck. “It’s a horrible thing to record someone without their knowledge and of course she sounds rational [on the recordings] because she’s the one with the tape on.” But surely the things Gibson said were indefensible, no matter what the provocation? “Well, if I think of some of the un-PC things I said in anger, especially when there’s children involved, then all bets are off,” counters Chubbuck. Whatever the truth behind those tapes (for a time, Gibson’s lawyers claimed they had proof the recordings had been edited), the ugly public spat with Grigorieva seems to be abating. Last month, she dropped her charges of domestic violence against him after Gibson entered what is known as a “West plea” that enables a case to be settled without the defendant admitting guilt. “I ended it for my children and my family,” Gibson said in an interview. “I’ll take the hit and move on.” The couple now share custody of their daughter, Lucia. “He remains extremely close with all his children,” says a good friend. “They have a great relationship and Robyn has also remained very loyal and supportive through this time. He’s been sober for a year now.” And he is still, as Sylbert points out, extremely rich. “Whatever the settlement with his ex [Grigorieva] will be, it won’t make a dent in it,” he says. “He’s made oodles and oodles of money. He’s a compulsive worker, he’s designed that way.” Indeed, Gibson has several movie projects in the pipeline. As well as the forthcoming How I Spent My Summer Vacation , which tells the story of a career criminal who learns to survive jail with the help of a nine-year-old boy, he is set to start filming Love and Honour , a swashbuckling romp written by Braveheart scriptwriter Randall Wallace in the autumn. He also plans to return to directing. “I spoke to him a few weeks ago and he sounded very up,” says Winther. “He said all the bad stuff was a cross to bear but he was not letting it burden him. I got the sense he’s a man in control and he knows what he needs to do [and] the movie business is a business that forgives.” Will Gibson have the strength of mind to keep himself on the straight and narrow? Winther believes so: “He’s the kind of guy who never gives up.” It remains to be seen whether Hollywood, and the filmgoing public, will give up on him. Mel Gibson Lars von Trier Elizabeth Day guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …