American freed by Italian court gives brief but emotional press statement in Seattle thanking ‘everyone who believed in me’ Amanda Knox has arrived home in Seattle saying she is “overwhelmed” to be back in the US following her acquittal of the murder of Meredith Kercher. Visibly emotional and shaking, Knox, who spent four years in an Italian prison, spoke briefly to supporters at a news conference after alighting at Seattle-Tacoma international airport shortly after 5pm local time. “I’m really overwhelmed right now,” she said. “I was looking down from the airplane and it seemed like everything wasn’t real.” Knox, 24, and ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito, 27, were cleared on appeal on Monday of the 2007 killing of Meredith Kercher in Perugia, Italy. Knox sobbed and held her mother’s hand as her lawyer Theodore Simon said her acquittal “unmistakably announced to the world” that she was not responsible for the killing. After her parents offered their thanks to Knox’s lawyers and supporters, Knox spoke briefly, saying: “They’re reminding me to speak in English, because I’m having problems with that.” “Thank you to everyone who’s believed in me, who’s defended me, who’s supported my family. “My family’s the most important thing to me so I just want to go and be with them, so thank you for being there for me.” Knox’s father, Curt, later spoke to reporters outside his house, where there was a small welcome home party but no sign of his daughter. He said Amanda “needed her space” and had not agreed to any media deals. “She has been in a concrete bunker for four years.” Curt Knox said Amanda would like to return to the University of Washington at some point to finish her degree, but for now “the focus simply is Amanda’s wellbeing and getting her reassociated with just being a regular person again”. He said he was concerned about what four years in prison may have done to his daughter. “What’s the trauma … and when will it show up, if it even shows up?” he said. “She’s a very strong girl but it’s been a tough time for her.” Theodore Simon described the Knox family’s situation as a “gruelling, four-year nightmarish marathon that no child or parent should have to endure”. “Meredith was Amanda’s friend. Amanda and the family want you to remember Meredith and keep the Kercher family in your prayers,” he said. On Tuesday the family of Meredith Kercher said that they were back to “square one.” Monday’s decision “obviously raises further questions”, her brother Lyle Kercher said. “If those two are not the guilty parties, then who are the guilty people?” Rudy Guede’s conviction for the murder of Meredith Kercher is the only one that still stands. His sentence was cut to 16 years in his final appeal. His lawyer has said he will seek a retrial. The prosecutor, Giuliano Mignini, has expressed disbelief at the appeal verdicts of Knox and Sollecito and said he will appeal to Italy’s highest criminal court after receiving the reasoning behind the acquittals, due within 90 days. “Let’s wait and we will see who was right. The first court or the appeal court,” Mignini said. “This trial was done under unacceptable media pressure.” Anne Bremner, a Seattle defence lawyer and spokesman for Friends of Amanda Knox, said Amanda was looking forward to having a backyard barbecue, being outside on the grass, playing football and seeing old friends. Amanda Knox Meredith Kercher United States Italy Lee Glendinning guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media While discussing The Huffington Post’s new hub for baby boomers on Morning Joe, the panel of Mika Brzezinski, Joe Scarborough, Arianna Huffington, Rita Wilson and Mike Barnicle basically turned the conversation into one big sales pitch for raising the retirement age to infinity. While I think it’s wonderful that Brzezinski is lucky enough to have both parents still apparently, happily working well into their eighties and that Wilson’s mother who’s approaching ninety is still doing well and independent, listening to all of them talk here left little doubt in my mind that all of them are certainly living in a different world than your average American out there who is doing any kind of physical labor for a living. And I’m sorry but using the example of Andy Rooney who just retired from his one day a week gig at 60 Minutes giving a few minute opinion piece at the end of the show as en example of someone who’s still “working” into their nineties is just ridiculous. Most Americans would consider what Rooney got paid to do for a living or what Brzezinski’s father does jetting around the world more like a vacation than anything you could rightfully describe as “work.” If Scarborough and Brzezinski think working into your old age is so great, I’d welcome her to come spend a little time along with her parents waiting on a few tables, or spending some time on a factory floor on an off shift, or maybe out digging some ditches with a construction crew, or perhaps answering an emergency call-out for some hot, filthy job at 3am in the morning. I have a feeling they’d reconsider their position after an hour or so if they lasted that long.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media While discussing The Huffington Post’s new hub for baby boomers on Morning Joe, the panel of Mika Brzezinski, Joe Scarborough, Arianna Huffington, Rita Wilson and Mike Barnicle basically turned the conversation into one big sales pitch for raising the retirement age to infinity. While I think it’s wonderful that Brzezinski is lucky enough to have both parents still apparently, happily working well into their eighties and that Wilson’s mother who’s approaching ninety is still doing well and independent, listening to all of them talk here left little doubt in my mind that all of them are certainly living in a different world than your average American out there who is doing any kind of physical labor for a living. And I’m sorry but using the example of Andy Rooney who just retired from his one day a week gig at 60 Minutes giving a few minute opinion piece at the end of the show as en example of someone who’s still “working” into their nineties is just ridiculous. Most Americans would consider what Rooney got paid to do for a living or what Brzezinski’s father does jetting around the world more like a vacation than anything you could rightfully describe as “work.” If Scarborough and Brzezinski think working into your old age is so great, I’d welcome her to come spend a little time along with her parents waiting on a few tables, or spending some time on a factory floor on an off shift, or maybe out digging some ditches with a construction crew, or perhaps answering an emergency call-out for some hot, filthy job at 3am in the morning. I have a feeling they’d reconsider their position after an hour or so if they lasted that long.
Continue reading …Britain and US advise travellers to avoid Lamu after woman’s abduction – drying up tourism and forcing hotels to lay off staff It has always been one of the most peaceful places in Kenya, and perhaps the most beautiful too – a Swahili island paradise of warm, deep-blue water, golden sands and ancient, narrow streets where cars are banned and donkeys rule. Even the commute from Lamu’s airport is spectacular, with wooden motorboats ferrying tourists to their hotels in the Old Town or further along the beach. But now the traffic is nearly all one way. “Few people coming,” said Mohamed Lali, 50, a boat captain wearing a faded T-shirt and a wrap. “Only people leaving.” The reason is fear. On Saturday morning a 66-year-old disabled French woman was kidnapped from her beach house in the Lamu archipelago by Somali gangsters who bundled her into a speedboat and escaped to mainland Somalia. The attack came two weeks after a British woman was abducted while on holiday further up the coast in Kiwayu, close to the Somali border. Her husband was killed. She is still missing. Following this weekend’s kidnapping several foreign governments immediately changed their travel advice. Britain and the US, which provide the biggest number of tourists to Kenya, warned their citizens to stay away from Lamu, as did France. At a stroke, the tourism sector here was shattered. Some guests took the first flight home. Others shortened their stays and cancellations poured in. At Lamu House, a high-end hotel on the Old Town seafront, there were 12 cancellations on Tuesday. Only one of the 10 rooms was occupied – by an expat couple on leave from their posts in Somalia. The hotel’s 45 staff members had gathered next to the swimming pool, listening to the Belgian owner, Frank Feremans. “I had to let half of them go,” he said, his eyes red with tears. “This is going to be a hard time for the people here.” Some hotels have shut altogether, especially on Manda island, where the French woman was kidnapped. Across the water in Shela, a village where super-wealthy Europeans, including Prince Albert of Monaco, own spectacular Swahili-style mansions, hotels have beefed up security. At Peponi Hotel, where the cheapest single room goes for £150, three armed police officers now keep watch at night, along with two watchmen on boats moored in front of the hotel. Lars Korschen, the owner, said there had been numerous cancellations, and though he had not yet laid off any of his 120 employees, the hotel was “way overstaffed”. “I can’t blame the governments for telling tourists not to come,” he said. “If it [the kidnapping] has happened twice, it could happen again.” The Kenyan authorities have been embarrassed by the kidnapping in Lamu. Though few locals had believed that the Somali kidnappers would be so brazen as to launch an attack here, there is a feeling that police were complacent. One hotel manager, who asked not to be named, said police had assured hotel owners after the Kiwayu kidnapping that security forces in Lamu were “on high alert, with all measures taken”. But even though there is a naval base in Lamu, the kidnappers were able to escape to Somalia, several hours away by boat. Two Kenyan naval officers drowned during the pursuit after their boat capsized. “The boats were not ready and the officers were not trained well,” the hotel manager said. Chastened, the Kenyan government sent the tourism minister and police chief to Lamu to try to allay fears of further attacks on tourists by Somali gangsters. Several police boats were in Lamu harbour on Tuesday, and a police aircraft waited on the airstrip. Fredrick Karenga, the district tourist officer, said a police helicopter would be stationed in town from now on, and officers were already positioned along the various coastal entry points to the main tourist areas. “We will not let Lamu die. We have learned our lesson and there will be no repeat,” Karenga said. But that is little consolation for Abdillahi Abubakar, a tour guide who has seen his business disappear overnight. It will be several months, and possibly much longer, before business returns to normal. But his loss has not been purely financial. “This place has always been peaceful. Everyone knew each other so we did not need police or much security. That’s how it was,” he said. Kenya Africa Somalia Piracy at sea Tourism, transport and travel Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …While urging the country not to become paralysed by gloom, prime minister admits the good times will be a long time coming David Cameron will urge the country not to become paralysed by gloom and fear even though he will admit the depth of the debt crisis means the good times will be a long time coming. In a delicate balancing act, he will try in his closing speech to the Conservative party conference on Wednesday to re-energise the country by insisting that despite the pessimism over the economy, politics and society, “the country’s best days are not behind us”. “Let’s bring on the can-do optimism,” he will say before claiming that his “leadership is about unleashing your leadership”. But despite the efforts to lift the mood of the country, Cameron will also provide a frank admission that the economy is not going to be fixed quickly. His aides openly admit that the country’s finances are in worse state than they had expected – a fact underlined by repeated downgrading of official growth forecasts. At one point he will even urge households to clear their debts: “The only way out of a debt crisis is to deal with your debts. That means households – all of us – paying off the credit card and store card bills.” In a frank assessment, he will tell delegates in Manchester: “We need to tell the truth about the overall economic situation. People understand that when the economy goes into recession, times get tough. But normally, after a while, things pick up. Strong growth returns. People get back into work. This time, it’s not like that. And people want to know why the good times are so long coming. “The answer is straightforward, but uncomfortable. This was no normal recession; we’re in a debt crisis. It was caused by too much borrowing, by individuals, businesses, banks – and, most of all, governments.” He will also warn there is a limit to what government can do to speed the process of rebuilding the foundations of the economy. “When you’re in a debt crisis, some of the normal things that government can do, to deal with a normal recession, like borrowing to cut taxes or increase spending, these things won’t work because they lead to more debt, which would make the crisis worse.” Cameron is not expected to make any new policy announcements. Plans to announce that convicted criminals might lose some benefits were withdrawn after they were deemed by civil servants to be as yet impractical. But the Conservatives revealed plans to require unemployed people to look for a job for several hours a day, and to be willing to accept a job within a 90-minute journey of their home or lose their benefits. Cameron did say he was considering the possibility of a “fat tax” to address the obesity crisis in the country but little detail has been advanced. He feels the need to lift the mood partly because he is concerned that talk of a return to recession could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy as tumbling consumer confidence reduces demand, increases worklessness and lowers demand. He will say: “If we put in the effort, correct the mistakes, confront those vested interests and take on the failed ideas of the past then I know we can turn this ship around. Nobody wants false optimism. And I will never pretend there are short cuts to success. But success will come.” His officials identified the vested interests as trade unions, restrictive employment laws or companies that do not offer apprenticeships. In a key passage, he will say: “The truth is, right now, we need to be energised, not paralysed by gloom and fear. Half the world is booming, let’s go and sell to them. So many of our communities are thriving – let’s make the rest like them … hard working, pioneering, independent, creative, adaptable, optimistic and can do.” Amid dire economic figures, In a range of broadcast interviews on Tuesday Cameron pleaded that we must not “talk ourselves down further” but admitted: “I think it is a moment of danger. I think there are some very serious clouds on the horizon, chief among them is the problems in the eurozone where the French economy, the German economy have both stalled, and that is a real problem for the British economy.” Cameron indicated that he is to use negotiations on the future of the eurozone to demand “safeguards” to protect the position of the City of London. As EU finance minsters discussed the Greek sovereign debt crisis, gGovernment sources suggested that Britain is prepared to use its veto in future EU treaty negotiations to block any threats to the City. The prime minister has made clear in recent months that he will call for the repatriation of social and employment laws if EU leaders embark on a fresh round of treaty negotiations to shore up the eurozone. Germany may ask for greater fiscal co-ordination within the 17-strong eurozone to avoid a repeat of the crisis in Greece, a step that would have to be agreed by all 27 members of the EU in an amendment to the Lisbon Treaty. In an interview with Radio 4′s Today programme, Cameron said that Britain would also use these negotiations to protect Britain’s position in the single market – code for protecting the City. “We will need certain safeguards to make sure that what the eurozone countries are agreeing separately does not adversely affect the single market, which is in our interest to make work for the good of British business.” Ministers are currently involved in lengthy negotiations to protect the position of the City of London as Michel Barnier, the European internal market commissioner, presses for a series of financial services regulations. Britain is concerned about the European Markets Infrastructure regulation (Emir), which deals with derivatives, and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid), which would create a new category of trading venue. David Cameron Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives Economic policy Recession Patrick Wintour Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ratings agency Moody’s slashes Italy debt rating by three points, increasing pressure on European governments trying to contain financial crisis • Bernanke says US economy is ‘close to faltering’ Italy’s sovereign debt rating has been cut for the second time in as many weeks, with ratings agency Moody’s citing “sustained and non-cyclical erosion of confidence” as it slashed its forecast for the country. In a report released after US stock markets closed on Tuesday, Moody’s downgraded Italy’s government bond ratings from Aa2 to A2 with a “negative outlook”, suggesting further cuts could be to come. The move threatens to increase Italy’s cost of borrowing, and will add yet more pressure to European finance ministers now wrestling with a financial crisis that has spread across the continent. Italy’s prime minsiter Silvio Berlusconi criticised Moody’s rival Standard & Poor’s when it cut Italy’s credit rating last month, saying the ratings agency’s action was “dictated more by newspaper stories than by reality”. In its report, Moody’s said the decision had been driven by three main factors: the debt crisis, which was causing a “sustained and non-cyclical erosion of confidence” in Europe and increasing “long-term funding risks” for Italy; the increased downside risks to economic growth due to macroeconomic structural weaknesses; and a weakening global outlook. “The implementation risks and time needed to achieve the government’s fiscal consolidation targets to reverse the adverse trend observed in the public debt, due to economic and political uncertainties,” Moody’s said. The Italian government said in a statement that the decision was expected, and reiterated its pledge to balance its budget. Italy last month approved a €54bn package of austerity measures aimed at eliminating the country’s budget woes and that it hoped would stave off a Moody’s downgrade. The pledge to cut government spending and raise taxes met with cautious approval from Brussels, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund but has not appeased Moody’s. “Even if policy actions were to succeed in the short term in returning some degree of normality to euro area sovereign debt markets, the underlying fragility and loss of confidence is deep and likely to be sustained,” Moody’s said in its report. “The Italian economy continues to face significant challenges due to structural economic weaknesses. These problems — mainly low productivity and important labour and product market rigidities — have been an impediment to the achievement of higher potential growth rates over the past decade and continue to hinder the economy’s recovery from the severe recession it experienced in 2009,” said Moody’s. “These structural impediments to economic growth cannot be removed quickly. The government’s reform plans have only just started to address some of these structural challenges, and they need to be implemented efficiently. Moreover, moderate medium-term growth prospects for the Italian economy have been further revised downwards due to potential adverse effects of a weakening European and global growth outlook.” Italy’s latest downgrade follows cuts for eurozone partners Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus. The news came after reports that European finance ministers were forging ahead with plans to support Europe’s weakening finance sector, news that had cheered US markets before they closed. European debt crisis Ratings agencies Italy Global economy Financial crisis European Union Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I guess we already knew that Russell Pearce — author of SB1070 and our favorite Nazi-coddling nativist politician — has nothing but contempt for Latino voters. Now he’s demonstrating the same contempt for every voter in his Arizona legislative district. Pearce, of course, is facing a recall election because voters in his district finally got tired of his anti-immigrant extremism — not to mention his coarse, embarrassing corruption . So how does Pearce go about convincing voters that now he’s a trustworthy public servant? Why, by indulging in a scam that colorfully demonstrates both his base bigotry and his utter lack of ethics, of course. It seems that Pearce’s operatives — notably, a local tea-party leader — went out and recruited a hapless conservative Latino lady named Olivia Cortes to run a sham candidacy in the upcoming recall election — the idea being that if enough Latinos vote for Cortes it will drain support away from his actual opponent, Jerry Lewis. Phoenix’s ABC 15 has more, including a revealing interview with Cortes herself, who demonstrates clearly on camera that she’s utterly clueless, a front for the tea partiers who support Pearce ardently: For the first time, could there be evidence Cortes is a sham candidate? It was presented in Maricopa County Superior Court during Thursday’s hearing. An audio recording could help in the case to block the senate candidacy of Cortes. In the recording, you hear Suzanne Dreher’s voice. She says she was paid to circulate petitions to get Olivia Cortes’ name on the ballot. A voter can be heard in the recording saying, “Oh, well, I don’t think I want to sign because I support Russell Pearce.” Dreher can reportedly be heard saying, “Well, then you want to sign.” Under oath, she testified to a hidden agenda to get Sen. Russell Pearce re-elected. “I was told if people were supporters of Pearce to go ahead and sign this and it would help his chances,” Dreher said in court. “So the idea was to dilute or divert the vote?” asked Tom Ryan, the plaintiff’s attorney. Dreher responded, “Yeah.” Ryan asked Dreher, “Did anyone talk to you prior to you doing this advise you that by running a diversionary or sham candidate that might run afoul of Arizona election laws? Dreher responded, “I had no idea.” Here’s Cortes’ full interview with ABC 15. As you can see, she’s being coached off-camera by the tea-partying Pearce operative — a guy named Greg Western — who created this fraud: Click here to view this media On Monday, the court ruled that Cortes can keep running, but it castigated Greg Western for playing games with the election: In his ruling, Burke did skewer East Valley Tea Party chairman Greg Western, a Pearce supporter who has been helping Cortes with her campaign. “His testimony that he has no idea who designed, posted, and paid for campaign signs supporting Cortes or who paid the professional circulators is too improbable to be believed,” he said. “The court finds that Pearce supporters recruited Cortes, a political neophyte, to run in the recall election to siphon Hispanic votes from Lewis to advance Pearce’s recall election bid.” Burke said without the support of Pearce supporters, Cortes would have had no chance of qualifying as a candidate or running any sort of political campaign, but reiterated that the court found no wrongdoing by Cortes herself. He said the courts should not, in most cases, be the final arbiter of the motives political candidates have for running for election. “Divining candidates’ motives and acting on them is more properly the role of the voters,” Burke said. “Plaintiff’s remedy is through the ballot box and not the courts.” He said the fact that many petition gatherers honestly told signers that signing Cortes’ petition would help Pearce makes it additionally difficult for him to find fraud. Meanwhile, an investigation has been launched into the question of who is paying for Cortes’ campaign, including the signs that are popping up all over Mesa. Amusingly enough, Pearce — who adamantly denies having anything to do with Cortes candidacy — tried playing the race card when he was called out on this: PEARCE: Where’s Gloria Allred when you need her? You know, this Hispanic woman doesn’t have a right to run? Is this a white male Mormon race only? Shame on them. Shame on them. Obviously, Pearce and his operatives think we’re all stupid. Or at least, that the voters of Mesa are.
Continue reading …At least one dead after a Bell 206 helicopter crashed into the river after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank At least one passenger has died after a helicopter which was believed to be carrying a group of British tourists crashed into New York’s East River after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank. Three of the tourists and the pilot were taken to hospital after they were pulled out of the river, according to the authorities, who said that two of the injured, both women, were in a critical condition. Police and fire department divers pulled victims of the crash out of the Bell 407 after it was submerged in murky waters near 34th Street in midtown Manhattan. Detective Martin Speechley of the New York Police Department told Sky News that the recovery operation would have “been done by touch” because that part of the river was so murky. Dan Sweeney, manager at the nearby Water Club restaurant, told the NBC New York news outlet that the helicopter appeared to be in the process of landing when it crashed. “It went down pretty fast, you could see the splash, you could see the top of it and it just disappeared,” he said. “It looked like it was trying to land at the heliport and missed the landing.” Joy Garnett and her husband were on the dock waiting to take the East River ferry to Brooklyn when they heard the blades of a helicopter and saw it start to take off from the nearby helipad. She told the Associated Press that she saw it do “a funny curlicue.” “I thought, ‘Is that some daredevil move?’” she said. “But it was obviously out of control. The body spun around at least two or three times, and then it went down.” She said the chopper had lifted about 25 feet (7.6 meters) off the ground before it dropped into the water without much of a splash. It flipped over, and the blades were sticking up out of the river. She said people on the dock started throwing in life jackets and buoys. Two people came up out of the waves. “It didn’t make much noise,” she said. “It was just a splash and sunk.” The weather was clear but a little windy at the time of the incident, with winds gusting up to 20 mph (32 kph) and visibility of 10 miles (16 kilometers), according to the weather station at LaGuardia airport. There were a few clouds at 3,500 feet (1,066 meters) above sea level, well above the typical flying altitude for helicopters. Carlos Acevedo, of Puerto Rico, was with his wife at a nearby park area when they saw the helicopter go down. “It sank fast,” he said. “In seconds. Like the water was sucking it in.” Lau Kamg was leaving a dentist’s office and was walking nearby when he saw the chopper go down, and he said it appeared to be in distress. “The sound got my attention,” he said. I saw it splash.” In August 2009, a small plane collided with a helicopter over the Hudson River, on the other side of Manhattan, killing nine people, including five Italian tourists. A government safety panel found that an air traffic controller who was on a personal phone call had contributed to the accident. The Federal Aviation Administration changed its rules for aircraft flying over New York City’s rivers after that collision. Pilots must call out their positions on the radio and obey a 161 mph speed limit. Before the changes, such radio calls were optional. Earlier that year, an Airbus 320 airliner landed in the Hudson after hitting birds and losing both engines shortly after taking off from LaGuardia Airport. The flight, US Airways Flight 1549, became known as the Miracle on the Hudson plane. The river has been closed to commercial boating traffic, the US Coast Guard said. United States New York Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …At least one dead after a Bell 206 helicopter crashed into the river after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank At least one passenger has died after a helicopter which was believed to be carrying a group of British tourists crashed into New York’s East River after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank. Three of the tourists and the pilot were taken to hospital after they were pulled out of the river, according to the authorities, who said that two of the injured, both women, were in a critical condition. Police and fire department divers pulled victims of the crash out of the Bell 407 after it was submerged in murky waters near 34th Street in midtown Manhattan. Detective Martin Speechley of the New York Police Department told Sky News that the recovery operation would have “been done by touch” because that part of the river was so murky. Dan Sweeney, manager at the nearby Water Club restaurant, told the NBC New York news outlet that the helicopter appeared to be in the process of landing when it crashed. “It went down pretty fast, you could see the splash, you could see the top of it and it just disappeared,” he said. “It looked like it was trying to land at the heliport and missed the landing.” Joy Garnett and her husband were on the dock waiting to take the East River ferry to Brooklyn when they heard the blades of a helicopter and saw it start to take off from the nearby helipad. She told the Associated Press that she saw it do “a funny curlicue.” “I thought, ‘Is that some daredevil move?’” she said. “But it was obviously out of control. The body spun around at least two or three times, and then it went down.” She said the chopper had lifted about 25 feet (7.6 meters) off the ground before it dropped into the water without much of a splash. It flipped over, and the blades were sticking up out of the river. She said people on the dock started throwing in life jackets and buoys. Two people came up out of the waves. “It didn’t make much noise,” she said. “It was just a splash and sunk.” The weather was clear but a little windy at the time of the incident, with winds gusting up to 20 mph (32 kph) and visibility of 10 miles (16 kilometers), according to the weather station at LaGuardia airport. There were a few clouds at 3,500 feet (1,066 meters) above sea level, well above the typical flying altitude for helicopters. Carlos Acevedo, of Puerto Rico, was with his wife at a nearby park area when they saw the helicopter go down. “It sank fast,” he said. “In seconds. Like the water was sucking it in.” Lau Kamg was leaving a dentist’s office and was walking nearby when he saw the chopper go down, and he said it appeared to be in distress. “The sound got my attention,” he said. I saw it splash.” In August 2009, a small plane collided with a helicopter over the Hudson River, on the other side of Manhattan, killing nine people, including five Italian tourists. A government safety panel found that an air traffic controller who was on a personal phone call had contributed to the accident. The Federal Aviation Administration changed its rules for aircraft flying over New York City’s rivers after that collision. Pilots must call out their positions on the radio and obey a 161 mph speed limit. Before the changes, such radio calls were optional. Earlier that year, an Airbus 320 airliner landed in the Hudson after hitting birds and losing both engines shortly after taking off from LaGuardia Airport. The flight, US Airways Flight 1549, became known as the Miracle on the Hudson plane. The river has been closed to commercial boating traffic, the US Coast Guard said. United States New York Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Justice secretary disputes home secretary’s tale of deportation halted over ownership of pet cat Downing Street rallied to the defence of Theresa May after the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, mocked her for suggesting that an illegal immigrant had resisted deportation on the grounds that he owned a pet cat. Friends of the justice secretary insisted he was standing firm after No 10 sources indicated that a humbled Clarke should show contrition by taking May, the home secretary, out for a “nice slap-up meal”. One of the quietest conference seasons in years came alive on its penultimate day when Clarke took issue with the announcement in May’s conference speech – that illegal immigrants are abusing the Human Rights Act to fight deportation from Britain. The home secretary illustrated her case by citing the example of a Bolivian national who resisted deportation on the grounds he owned a cat, Maya. May, who wants to abolish the Human Rights Act, said : “The illegal immigrant who cannot be deported because – I am not making this up – he had a pet cat.” Speaking an hour later at a fringe meeting, hosted by the Daily Telegraph, Clarke ridiculed May’s remarks. Clarke, a strong defender of the European convention on human rights, which provided the basis for the HRA, said: “I’ve never had a conversation on the subject with Theresa, so I’d have to find out about these strange cases she is throwing out. They are British cases and British judges she is complaining about. I cannot believe anybody has ever had deportation refused on the basis of owning a cat. I’ll have a small bet with her that nobody has ever been refused deportation on the grounds of the ownership of a cat.” The remarks by the justice secretary triggered a string of jokes on Twitter about a catfight involving Clarke, May and a cat whose name is one letter longer than the home secretary’s surname. Stefan Stern, a professor at the Cass Business School, even managed to link the spat to the phone-hacking scandal. “Neither the cat nor Coulson were properly vetted,” he tweeted at #kittygate. But as the jokes – and the proverbial fur – flew on Twitter, a classic briefing war erupted in Manchester between the cabinet ministers’ camps. Home Office sources said Clarke was wrong because the immigration judge had cited the case of Maya the cat when he ruled against deportation. This was dismissed on appeal. A Home Office source said: “This shows why we need clarification. There is a complete lack of clarity here.” But sources in the Clarke camp cited a statement by the judicial communications office, which represents senior judges, insisting the tale was not true and said it had told May’s department as much. A spokeswoman for the judicial communications office said: “This was a case in which the Home Office conceded that they had mistakenly failed to apply their own policy – applying at that time to that appellant – for dealing with unmarried partners of people settled in the UK.’ A friend of Clarke said: “That statement is really serious. That is the authentic voice of the judiciary. We have a situation where the home secretary – the home secretary – has made a mistake on a basic point. The Home Office are going bananas because they know Theresa made a mistake.” But Downing Street sources defended May and turned its humour on Clarke as it said that Clarke should hand her a fiver after losing his bet. One source said: “David Cameron really likes the policy announced by Theresa May. Ken wanted reassurance that a cat was not involved. He has had that.” In a final flourish of humour, the source said: I am sure he will want to pause for thought. Get it?” May used the example of the cat to illustrate the need to amend immigration rules to restrict the ability of illegal immigrants and foreign criminals to resist deportation by invoking the right to a family life under article eight of the Human Rights Act. This incorporates rights enshrined in the European convention on human rights (ECHR). May’s speech was not shown to Clarke. In common with conference speeches by all cabinet minsters, it was cleared with the “quad” committee of David Cameron, Nick Clegg, George Osborne and Danny Alexander. Sadiq Khan, the shadow justice secretary, said: “The energy and time this government is spending on arguments about the HRA shows how completely out of touch it is with the British people who are not interested in catfights between ministers but how the safety of their communities will be protected after cuts in police budgets which go too far and too fast.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Kenneth Clarke Theresa May Human rights Human Rights Act Nicholas Watt Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …