All the latest developments as the Assad regime in Syria continues its crackdown on dissenters 11.56am: Al-Jazeera has a report from the refugee camps on the southern border of Turkey and Syria where thousands have fled the bloodshed. In this video a man says how he was shot three times on the way back from a funeral in the besieged town of Jisr al-Shughour by Syrian military intelligence offers: They were waiting for us – like an ambush. When we arrived at a certain spot they just appeared. The people didn’t kill outright, they beat them till they died. We had no guns, no arms, nothing in our hands. 11.54am: The UK foreign secretary, William Hague, has issued a statement on the anniversary of the protests about the disputed 2009 Iranian presidential elections, which draws parallels between that uprising and the Arab spring. Two years ago we saw the Iranian people take to the streets to dispute the results of the 2009 Presidential election and demand representation reflecting the will of the people. They were ultimately denied this, but we all remember the scenes of Iranians pouring onto the streets in peaceful protest to demand their civil and political rights. Two years later we have seen similar demonstrations in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere in the Arab World; protests that the Iranian regime now claims to support. This feigned support is all the more disturbing when we consider what has happened in Iran since 2009. There has been a brutal crackdown on all those who freely and peacefully sought to express their views and a concerted attempt to silence any opposition. And now there is plenty of evidence that Iran is exporting these same repressive techniques to its long time ally Syria, as Syria’s rulers brutalise their people to cling to power. It is not in our conscience as a nation to stand by as people are stoned, locked up for defending their rights under their constitution, or beaten on the streets by hired thugs. Two years after people took to the streets to demand reform, I want it to be known that our attention has not been diverted and we will continue to call on Iran to implement its international human rights obligations. 11.17am: The opposition Ugarit News channel and Shaam News Network both continue to post videos of the crackdown on protesters on YouTube. This clip Ugarit News appears to show Syrian security forces opening fire on protesters in Damascus yesterday who were chanting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” 11.01am: The release of a report showing that American firms sold around $200m of arms to Bahrain last year is likely to fuel further criticism of US Middle East policy. The US government approved the military sales just months before the autocratic regime launched its brutal crackdown against pro-democracy protesters, AP reports. The state department annual report on global sales of US arms showed that licensed defence sales to Bahrain rose by $112m between 2009 and 2010. The bulks of the military hardware sold was for aircraft and military electronics. But the US also licensed $760,000 in exports of rifles, shotguns and assault weapons, which raises the possibility that some might have been used against protesters. 10.34am: Reuters has more details about the deployment of Syrian helicopter gunships in the northern town of Maarat al-Numaan. The helicopters opened fire after security forces on the ground killed five protesters, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told the news agency: “At least five helicopters flew over Maarat al-Numaan and began firing their machine guns to disperse the tens of thousands who marched in the protest,” one witness said by telephone. “People hid in fields, under bridges and in their houses, but the firing continued on the mostly empty streets for hours,” said the witness, who gave his name as Nawaf. This brief clip posted on YouTube appears to show a government helicopter flying over the town. Syria’s state television, in contrast, blamed violence in the area on anti-government groups. It made no mention of attack helicopters but said an ambulance helicopter had come under fire over Maarat from “terrorist armed groups,” injuring crew. 10.28am: An elite army division commanded by Assad’s younger brother, Maher, is believed to be responsible for most of yesterday’s violence, AP reports: The decision to mobilise his unit against the most serious threats to the Assad regime could be a sign of concern about the loyalty of regular conscripts. 10.09am: The besieged town of Jisr al-Shughour is almost deserted this morning, surrounded by tanks and heavy armour, AP reports: Syrian state television on Saturday said army units arrested several leaders of the alleged armed groups in the area. About 80% of the population has fled, with more than 4,000 Syrians taking sanctuary across the Turkish frontier. The town – normally inhabited by 41,000 people – has become a focal point of the Syrian revolution ever since Assad’s regime vowed to wreak vengeance on its mostly forsaken inhabitants, who the regime accuses of killing 120 government troops last weekend. Refugees who crossed the border into Turkey said the chaos had erupted as government forces and police mutinied and joined the local population against the forces loyal to Assad. But AP reports that, despite the build up of Assad’s forces, protests have spread to every major town in the region. In the town of Maaret al-Numan, 25 miles (40km) to the south-east of Jisr al-Shughour, thousands of protesters overwhelmed security forces and torched the courthouse and police station. The BBC’s Owen Bennett Jones spoke to refugees just over the border in Turkey who told him Assad’s forces were operating a scorched earth policy in the region, with people being shot in their beds. 9.47am: Good morning and welcome to our continued coverage of the unrest in the Middle East. Syria continues to be the focus of international concern with thousands of people fleeing into Turkey to escape the deadly crackdown on pro-democracy protesters. Here’s a round-up of the latest developments: • Syrian tanks have sealed off the northern town of Jisr al-Shughour , with pro-democracy activists warning that they expect an all-out assault by government troops. More than 20 people were killed across the northern province of Idlib yesterday. • Syrian helicopter gunships have fired machine guns to disperse thousands of protesters in the north-western town of Maarat al-Numaan in the first reported use of air power to quell unrest in the three-month-old uprising. • The US has condemned Syria’s “outrageous use of violence” against anti-government protesters. The White House said President Bashar al-Assad’s regime was leading Syria down a “dangerous path” and called for “an immediate end to the brutality and violence”. • Syria has warned the United Nations against intervening in its internal affairs. Syrian foreign minister Walid al-Moualem said a European draft resolution condemning the country for its crackdown on anti-government protesters would only embolden “extremists and terrorists”. • Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has accused Assad of failing to take the violence perpetrated by his troops seriously , warning that the crackdown by Syria’s intelligence service was “heading towards a massacre” . Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Refugees Protest Bashar Al-Assad Libya David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …That Rachel Maddow of MSNBC and Chris Hayes of The Nation may be perpetuating the Weiner scandal apparently has not occurred to them. Maddow told Hayes last night that she could understand why Republicans were calling for Congressman Anthony Weiner to resign, but she was at a loss to understand why his fellow Democrats in Congress were doing likewise (video clip after page break) — HAYES: I think it's two things. I think, one, is that Anthony Weiner is not the most popular member of the Democratic caucus amongst his colleagues. He is obviously highly visible, very brash, extremely extremely ambitious, everyone knows this. He's not the kind of person who has a ton of sort of close relationships I think on the Hill and so I think that's part of it. The other part is that I think it's just this calculation of, either this should end or he should shut up or we should just move on. I think the impulse is to stop talking about Anthony Weiner, which I think is an impulse that Lord, I share, and I hope most of the country does at this point, that that, you know, just cut it off at the pass and maybe this, then we'll move onto something else. Talk about a peculiar “impulse” — demonstrating how much he dislikes talking about something by continuing to talk about it. Hey, whatever it takes for Hayes to get it out of his system. Followed by Maddow saying this — MADDOW: Well, what explains the media blitz over Anthony Weiner that will not stop? I mean, we had, again, this is an empirical question. We have a source of comparison. Comparatively, nothing about John Ensign and even David Vitter, those scandals, as salacious as they were and much more complicated, interesting, salacious, evil arguably (laughs) than this, got almost nothing, but the Anthony Weiner saga will not end. It's all Maddow can do to keep mulling it over while holding her nose. It's worth noting that Maddow said this on her show last night — after having led with the Weiner scandal for three nights in a row, starting on Monday, the day Weiner came clean, to the extent he did. In fact, more than half of Maddow's show on Monday, the first three segments, was devoted to the scandal. The next night Maddow led again with Weiner, focusing on what she perceived as the hypocrisy of House majority leader Eric Cantor calling on Weiner to resign after Cantor had not done so when then-House colleague David Vitter was implicated in the DC madam scandal in 2007. After weighing in on this, Maddow discussed Republicans' response to the Weiner scandal with former RNC chairman Michael Steele. The next night, June 8, Maddow again led with the Weiner story, thereby helping extend its half-life, and again focusing on Republican hypocrisy in giving Vitter a pass while now calling on Weiner to resign. By the time Maddow show rolled around Thursday night, Maddow apparently decided it was time to stop flogging the GOP for Weiner's indiscretions, if only momentarily. She led with the en masse resignation of Gingrich senior campaign staffers, followed by Romney's decision to skip the Iowa straw poll in August, and a Reuters story claiming Hillary Clinton may leave the State Department to work at the World Bank. After this, the inevitable segment on Weiner, with Hayes similarly perturbed by all the attention it's getting. It wouldn't surprise me if Maddow breathed more life into the Weiner scandal on her final show of the week tonight only 24 hours after asking why the media just can't shake it.
Continue reading …Footage of Sarfaraz Shah’s shooting likely to further undermine faith in Pakistan’s security forces Pakistan’s security forces are facing criticism after paramilitary troops were caught on camera apparently shooting dead a teenager at point-blank range. The footage, broadcast repeatedly on local television, is likely to further undermine faith in the country’s powerful security establishment, which is already facing allegations it helped conceal Osama bin Laden. The video, captured by a cameraman from Pakistan’s Awaz television channel, shows a youth, identified as Sarfaraz Shah, arguing with paramilitary rangers in Karachi. The 18-year-old appears to plead for mercy before being shot at close quarters. He then falls to the ground and screams in pain as blood pools beneath his legs. Zohra Yusuf, head of Pakistan’s independent Human Rights Commission , condemned the killing as “another indication of law enforcement personnel becoming increasingly trigger happy.” She said the violence depicted in the video was a trend seen across Pakistan that reflected the impunity of the country’s law enforcers. Pakistan’s prime minister, Yousuf Raza Gilani, said an inquiry would be launched and the culprits punished. Six members of the paramilitary Rangers, who are controlled by the interior ministry, have since been arrested. Major general Aijaz Chaudhry, who commands the force, described the incident as “deplorable”. “The Rangers have no authority to kill any unarmed individual and they can fire only in self-defence,” he said. “On completion of the inquiry, all those found responsible will be given strict punishment.” The incident is likely to further dent public faith in the government’s ability to control its security forces at a time when the US ally is facing questions about how bin Laden could have hidden for so long without the complicity of intelligence officials. “What we saw on television shows that now there is the law of the jungle in this country and no one is accountable for his action or deeds. This is pathetic,” Mohammad Sultan, a retired soldier, told Reuters. “What we are seeing is visual records of what we have long documented, which is the culture of impunity in the Pakistani law enforcement agencies,” said Ali Dayan Hasan, a researcher for Human Rights Watch . “What is becoming clear is that the free for all, the culture of wanton abuse and killing, is becoming untenable in the age of new media and cell phone cameras.” In one media interview, a man identified as Salik Shah, the victim’s brother, said: “My brother was a victim of barbarism, brutality and aggression and everyone has seen it. The innocent young man was begging for his life regardless of whether he had done anything wrong. He was asking to be pardoned by the rangers; despite his repeated requests they did not listen to him, they did not arrest him, instead they were adamant about killing him and in the end they did.” Hundreds of people showed up at Shah’s funeral a day after his death and denounced the Rangers. Some shouted “Rangers, murderers!” and others carried signs that said “Down with the Karachi Rangers.” The video’s broadcast comes a few days after a prominent journalist was tortured to death after reporting claims about al-Qaida. Military intelligence officials have rejected claims they played a role in the killing. Pakistan’s Daily Times newspaper said the military, paramilitary forces, police and intelligence agencies “who confidently violate human rights” should be held accountable for their actions. “The security and law enforcement forces that do not respect the law themselves are inviting anarchy, which arguably is already under way,” it said in an editorial. Last year, a video emerged of two teenage brothers being beaten to death before being strung up on a metal pole in broad daylight as police personnel looked on. Pakistan Middle East Human rights Osama bin Laden Barry Neild guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Gov. Rick Perry of Texas is getting some attention these days since the base of the GOP is very unhappy with its presidential choices so far. Most readers only know about Perry because of his civil war type proclivities: Gov. Perry Talks Secession for Texas at Tea Party: “Texas Can Leave Union If It Wants To” Why they think Rick Perry is someone they should support is beyond me, but whatever. I’ve been on Houston radio a few times and have been told off air that Perry has a lot of problems that the rest of the country doesn’t know about as of yet and I can believe that. But what we do know this side of his state is that he loves his extreme religious right leaders. He’s hosting a prayer rally in Houston called The Response which has its fair share of super Evangelical fringers Right Wing Watch puts together an fact sheet to some of these fringers: The American Family Association The AFA today is led by Tim Wildmon, Don’s son, and its chief spokesperson is Bryan Fischer, the Director of Issues Analysis for Government and Public Policy and host of its flagship radio show Focal Point. Fischer routinely expresses support for some of the most bigoted and shocking ideas found in the Religious Right today. He has: held gays responsible for the Holocaust and likened them to domestic terrorists and Nazis who are intent on committing “ virtual genocide ” against the military, and asserts that “homosexuals should be disqualified from public office ”; said “ we have feminized the Medal of Honor ” by awarding it to a soldier who saved his fellow combatants rather than killing enemies; demanded all immigrants “ convert to Christianity ” and renounce their religions; asserted that Muslims have “ no fundamental First Amendment claims ” and should be banned from building mosques and deported from the US , adding that Muslims are inherently stupid as a result of inbreeding ; claimed African American women “ rut like rabbit s” due to welfare and that Native Americans are “ morally disqualified” from living in America because they didn’t convert to Christianity and were consequently cursed by God with alcoholism and poverty . Then there’s the IHOP group and no it’s doesn’t involve pancakes: The Response’s leadership team includes five staff members of the International House of Prayer (IHOP), a large, highly political Pentecostal organization built on preparing participants for the return of Jesus Christ. IHOP is closely associated with Lou Engle, a Religious Right leader whose anti-gay, anti-choice extremism hasn’t stopped him from hobnobbing with Republican leaders including Newt Gingrich , Michele Bachmann and Mike Huckabee . Engle is the founder of The Call , day-long rallies against abortion rights and gay marriage, which Engle says are meant to break Satan’s control over the U.S. government. One recent Call event featured “prophet” Cindy Jacobs calling for repentance for the “girl-on-girl kissing” of Britney Spears and Madonna. Perry’s The Response event is clearly built upon Engle’s “The Call” model. Engle has a long history of pushing extreme right-wing views and advocating for a conservative theocracy in America. Engle: is a proponent of “Seven Mountains” dominionism , a movement that seeks to have Christians take control of all aspects of American life, including government, business, entertainment and the media;supports the criminalization of homosexuality ; claimed that universities with LGBT anti-discrimination measures are teaching students to “ accept the mark of the beast ”; is waging a “ spiritual war ” on the Supreme Court to get abortion outlawed in America; prays that Ellen Degeneres will be “converted” from homosexuality. The International House of Prayer, incidentally, remains locked in a copyright infringement lawsuit with the International House of Pancakes . And then there’s the odious Jim Garlow: Most importantly, Garlow is a close spiritual adviser to presidential candidate Newt Gingrich and leads Gingrich’s Renewing American Leadership (ReAL) . Garlow is a principal advocate of Seven Mountains Dominionism , and wants to “bring armies of people” to bring Religious Right leaders into public office and defeat their political opponents. Garlow has a long record of extreme rhetoric. He: when Prop 8 passed in California, claimed that African Americans “ saved us from the bondage and enslavement that would come upon us if gay marriage actually passed in a state” and alleged marriage equality supporters are going to “ totally destroy the definition of the family ”; likened homosexuality to bestiality , saying that if marriage equality is upheld “the next court case could conceivably say that if three people wanted to marry or four people or five people or if someone wanted to marry their dog or their horse”; compared gay adoption to children losing their parents in the September 11th attacks and said that supporters of gay rights are “ almost like an Antichrist spirit” ; told conservative activists that “ your land has cance r” and believes that the “lethal ideological ‘radiation’” of progressives “is killing our nation” and “poisoning us and our children”; argued that legal abortion is responsible for unemployment . So there you have some of the basic haters that are part of Rick Perry’s minions. Now he has Rush Limbaugh on his tail because ” He Supports “In-State Tuition For The Children Of Illegal Immigrants” I’ve written about Texas passing a Dream Act type legislation that has been very successful so since it works and helps immigrants, Limbaugh most be opposed. In 2001, Gov. Rick Perry signed House Bill 1403 into law after the bill passed the Senate with zero no votes. House Bill 1403 by former Rep. Rick Noriega, D-Houston, now called the Texas Dream Act , has proven to be an incredibly successful law providing access to higher education for students who may otherwise be unable to afford the increasing cost of attending college. Texas law currently provides that all students, regardless of immigration status, may qualify for in-state tuition at Texas colleges or universities provided they have lived in Texas the three years leading up to high school graduation and resided in Texas the year prior to their enrollment in higher education. The Texas Dream Act thus recognizes that immigrant students who have been educated in our Texas public schools have strong family, community and economic ties to the U.S. The state then follows through on the investment taxpayers have made in their education by allowing them to pay the same tuition rate as other Texans who meet the residency timeline requirements. These students have been admitted to colleges and universities based on their merit and despite the many obstacles with which they are confronted — a principle every Texan can appreciate. The law is both successful and popular because it reduces dropouts, encourages access to college and comes at little expense to the state. This type of legislation should be celebrated, but since Limbaugh admits that he’s now “center of the universe for the RNC , the nativists are running the GOP so it’s a dark stain for anyone wanting the GOP nomination.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media One of the incessant mantras we hear from right-wingers demanding we “secure the border” — particularly the Minuteman types and their media enablers — is that the need to do became incredibly important after 9/11, because Islamist terrorists were certain to be crossing into the United States through the desert. That’s certainly what we’ve been hearing constantly at Fox News and its many onscreen nativists, perhaps most notably Michelle Malkin. Remember how Glenn Beck tried to stir up a panic over the finding of a book on Iranian martyrs out in the desert — which just happened to be an English translation? It even inspired Rep. Trent Franks to proclaim: “If terrorists ever come across our border with nuclear weapons… they (could) hold an entire city hostage … This book is a grave reminder of the mindset and intent of the indescribably dangerous enemy we face.” And then there are the politicians who’ve used the claim to attack President Obama, such as wingnut Sheriff Paul Babeu of Pinal County : “”If the majority of regular illegal immigrants can sneak into America, what does this say about the ability of terrorist sleeper cells?” Well, as we’ve been saying about this supposed threat for some time now: They’re barking up the wrong tree : A turning political tide has renewed fears that raged after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks – that terrorists will sneak into the country across the U.S.-Mexico border. Nobody disputes that’s possible, but analysts and government officials say terrorists plotting to kill Americans are more likely to use other routes into the country, if they’re not here already. It’s much more common for people convicted in the U.S. of crimes connected to international terrorism to have been U.S. citizens or legal residents, or come into the country on visas. “There is no serious evidence that the U.S.-Mexico border is a significant threat from terrorism,” said Edward Alden, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a nonpartisan think tank based in New York. Claims of terrorist threats on the Southwest border distract legislators and policymakers from addressing long-term solutions to drug smuggling and illegal immigration, said Tom Barry, senior analyst at the Center for International Policy in Washington. “It’s politically motivated,” Barry said, “playing on that sense of fear that certain people are susceptible to.” That’s pretty much what we said awhile back : Meanwhile, if terrorists really want to sneak into the country, they’ll likely do it the way they do traditionally: forge papers and come in through the front gate with visas. That’s how the 9/11 terrorists came in, and it’s fairly simple and easy for them — unlike, say, paying large sums to drug lords to sneak you over in a highly dangerous illegal crossing in the remote backcountry, which is how nativists like Malkin seem to imagine the terrorists are sneaking in. Moreover, if Malkin wants to worry about terrorists sneaking over our borders, she’d be better off keeping an eye on the Canadian border. After all, the only known case of a terrorist caught bringing materiel over the border — the 1999 Ahmed Ressam incident — happened in Washington state, on the ferryboat from Canada. A quantitative analysis of terrorist threats to the U.S. found that there was “no terrorist presence in Mexico and no terrorists who entered the U.S. from Mexico”; but there was in fact “a sizeable terrorist presence in Canada and a number of Canadian-based terrorists who have entered the U.S.” The idea that it’s possible to completely secure the border by physical means is a fantasy anyway. You defeat terrorism with intelligence — not stupidity.
Continue reading …• Thousands flee into Turkey in face of advance • Demonstrations met with gunfire, say activists The Syrian regime ordered its army to enter the besieged town of Jisr al-Shughour on Friday as pro-democracy demonstrations across the country were met with gunfire, leaving more than 20 dead, according to activists. Over the past few days refugees have flooded across the border into Turkey, where officials say almost 3,000 Syrians have made their way to camps to escape the fighting. Most have walked over rolling hills from the northern town that has been menaced all week by Syrian tanks and troops, who finally entered Jisr al-Shughour just after daybreak. Those who had reached Turkey were unable to contact those relatives that had stayed behind, with all lines to the town cut. Anecdotal reports suggested Jisr al-Shughour has been largely abandoned. There were no means of establishing what was taking place during the largest operation mounted by the Syrian army since the initial popular uprising of 15 March. The town – normally inhabited by 41,000 people – has become a focal point of the Syrian revolution ever since President Bashar al-Assad’s regime vowed to wreak vengeance on its mostly forsaken inhabitants, who the regime accuses of killing 120 government troops last weekend. Almost all its residents are now on the move. Two men who spoke with the Guardian in the southern Turkish village of Guvecci on Friday, less than an hour after they had crossed the border, said many hundreds were hiding in the 20 miles of hills and valleys between their home town and safety. Turkey said it would take in as many refugees as it needed to. The quid pro quo, however, continued to be that none of them were allowed to speak publicly about what they had endured. The Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has remained a staunch supporter of Assad throughout. However, Erdogan appeared to change tone on Thursday night, describing the situation in Syria as “appalling” and suggesting that Damascus had not taken seriously his most recent complaints. Despite mounting condemnation, there appeared to be no respite on Friday in the violence elsewhere in Syria, with human rights groups in Damascus claiming that up to 21 people had been killed at demonstrations across the country. The largest of them appeared to be in the capital, where activists reported that troops fired teargas and live rounds into numerous suburbs. Large protests were also held in Lattakia, Alleppo and Hama, where more than 60 demonstrators were killed the previous Friday. Friday, the first day of the weekend in Syria, when worshippers gather in mosques to pray, has been the bloodiest day of each of the past six weeks. Prayers have often spilled over into demonstrations, then marches, which had been outlawed for much of the past four decades as potential threats to the dictatorship. This Friday was no different, despite clear signs that the embattled regime was refusing to acknowledge international condemnation that this week led to attempts by Britain and France to introduce a resolution criticising Syrian leaders at the UN security council. Syrian refugees also continued to stream into Lebanon, where there were no restraints on them giving accounts of what had happened during clashes in their towns and villages. None of the residents from Jisr al-Shughour had seemingly tried to reach the Lebanese border, with nearly all having fled north, raising the spectre of a humanitarian crisis between the town and the Turkish border. “There are people still trying to get to the border who have no food or water,” said Hassan, an 18-year-old shopkeeper from Jisr al-Shughour, who claimed to have found a way across the frontier that he uses to resupply family members on the move. “I have been in this area for five days, coming and going, and there are more people travelling than before.” A clearer picture also began to emerge of the deadly series of battles that took place in Jisr al-Shughour last weekend, leading the government to vow revenge. The Guardian has spoken with six men who all said independently that some men with full beards and in civilian clothes stood alongside Syrian soldiers last Saturday as battles raged in the town. Their accounts could not be corroborated. But British officials on Friday reiterated a claim that the Syrian government is receiving advice and riot control equipment from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Westminster said it had seen no evidence of Iran sending troops or paramilitaries to suppress Syrian protests directly. “That would be something new, that we have not been aware of, but we can’t rule it out,” one official said. On Thursday, the UK’s chargé d’affaires in Tehran was summoned to the foreign ministry to hear Iranian complaints about the British allegations. “The UK stands by its statements,” the UK Foreign Office said in a statement. “We have seen credible information suggesting Iran is helping Syria with the suppression of protests there, including through the provision of expertise and equipment.” Syria Bashar Al-Assad Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Turkey Refugees Martin Chulov Julian Borger guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Thousands flee into Turkey in face of advance • Demonstrations met with gunfire, say activists The Syrian regime ordered its army to enter the besieged town of Jisr al-Shughour on Friday as pro-democracy demonstrations across the country were met with gunfire, leaving more than 20 dead, according to activists. Over the past few days refugees have flooded across the border into Turkey, where officials say almost 3,000 Syrians have made their way to camps to escape the fighting. Most have walked over rolling hills from the northern town that has been menaced all week by Syrian tanks and troops, who finally entered Jisr al-Shughour just after daybreak. Those who had reached Turkey were unable to contact those relatives that had stayed behind, with all lines to the town cut. Anecdotal reports suggested Jisr al-Shughour has been largely abandoned. There were no means of establishing what was taking place during the largest operation mounted by the Syrian army since the initial popular uprising of 15 March. The town – normally inhabited by 41,000 people – has become a focal point of the Syrian revolution ever since President Bashar al-Assad’s regime vowed to wreak vengeance on its mostly forsaken inhabitants, who the regime accuses of killing 120 government troops last weekend. Almost all its residents are now on the move. Two men who spoke with the Guardian in the southern Turkish village of Guvecci on Friday, less than an hour after they had crossed the border, said many hundreds were hiding in the 20 miles of hills and valleys between their home town and safety. Turkey said it would take in as many refugees as it needed to. The quid pro quo, however, continued to be that none of them were allowed to speak publicly about what they had endured. The Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has remained a staunch supporter of Assad throughout. However, Erdogan appeared to change tone on Thursday night, describing the situation in Syria as “appalling” and suggesting that Damascus had not taken seriously his most recent complaints. Despite mounting condemnation, there appeared to be no respite on Friday in the violence elsewhere in Syria, with human rights groups in Damascus claiming that up to 21 people had been killed at demonstrations across the country. The largest of them appeared to be in the capital, where activists reported that troops fired teargas and live rounds into numerous suburbs. Large protests were also held in Lattakia, Alleppo and Hama, where more than 60 demonstrators were killed the previous Friday. Friday, the first day of the weekend in Syria, when worshippers gather in mosques to pray, has been the bloodiest day of each of the past six weeks. Prayers have often spilled over into demonstrations, then marches, which had been outlawed for much of the past four decades as potential threats to the dictatorship. This Friday was no different, despite clear signs that the embattled regime was refusing to acknowledge international condemnation that this week led to attempts by Britain and France to introduce a resolution criticising Syrian leaders at the UN security council. Syrian refugees also continued to stream into Lebanon, where there were no restraints on them giving accounts of what had happened during clashes in their towns and villages. None of the residents from Jisr al-Shughour had seemingly tried to reach the Lebanese border, with nearly all having fled north, raising the spectre of a humanitarian crisis between the town and the Turkish border. “There are people still trying to get to the border who have no food or water,” said Hassan, an 18-year-old shopkeeper from Jisr al-Shughour, who claimed to have found a way across the frontier that he uses to resupply family members on the move. “I have been in this area for five days, coming and going, and there are more people travelling than before.” A clearer picture also began to emerge of the deadly series of battles that took place in Jisr al-Shughour last weekend, leading the government to vow revenge. The Guardian has spoken with six men who all said independently that some men with full beards and in civilian clothes stood alongside Syrian soldiers last Saturday as battles raged in the town. Their accounts could not be corroborated. But British officials on Friday reiterated a claim that the Syrian government is receiving advice and riot control equipment from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Westminster said it had seen no evidence of Iran sending troops or paramilitaries to suppress Syrian protests directly. “That would be something new, that we have not been aware of, but we can’t rule it out,” one official said. On Thursday, the UK’s chargé d’affaires in Tehran was summoned to the foreign ministry to hear Iranian complaints about the British allegations. “The UK stands by its statements,” the UK Foreign Office said in a statement. “We have seen credible information suggesting Iran is helping Syria with the suppression of protests there, including through the provision of expertise and equipment.” Syria Bashar Al-Assad Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Turkey Refugees Martin Chulov Julian Borger guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Attack launched as a response to Thursday’s airstrikes by Nato helicopters on communications and military positions Muammar Gaddafi has raised the stakes in the conflict with Nato, responding to air strikes by Apache helicopters with the heaviest bombardment of the besieged rebel enclave of Misrata in two months. Rockets and mortar shells rained down on opposition positions around the ruined village of Dafniya, leaving 22 rebels dead, the highest toll since they took control of the city in mid-April. A stream of ambulances brought the dead and wounded to the city’s Hikma hospital. Bodies arrived with limbs missing, accompanied by the shouts of medics, the thud of Grad rockets and the wail of prayers from mosques. “The frontline is like hell,” said Feras Mohammed, a 20-year-old medic who accompanied a badly injured soldier in an ambulance. On the frontline, trees were set on fire by the constant stream of grads and rockets. Gaddafi’s forces launched an infantry attack supported by four tanks which was repulsed by rebel fighters, who then pushed on into Gaddafi-held territory for six miles. “We attacked them and caught two tanks which we destroyed,” said a fighter, Mohamed Khalid. Nato helicopters made a series of strikes on communications and military positions outside Misrata on Thursday night. But when Gaddafi forces replied with the morning attack, Nato planes were nowhere to be seen. Rebel commanders have repeatedly complained that Nato has ignored requests for air support. “The tanks were clear for Nato. I don’t know why Nato didn’t bomb. They were very easy to see,” said Khalid. Nearby, 20-year-old hospital porter Ali Buzet sat wailing after his cousin was brought in with wounds to his head, face, stomach and legs from a grad rocket strike. Standing amid the chaos dressed in a spotless white uniform and red headscarf, nurse Mona Felag was close to tears. “The only wounds are rocket wounds, rocket wounds and mortar wounds, no bullet wounds. That is how Gaddafi’s forces fight. They are not men, they are not real men.” The bombardment lasted all day. The thunder of rocket and mortar fire was so constant that for long periods the explosions blended into one long rumble. The failure of the alliance to counter the assault is likely to sharpen criticism that Nato, having refused permission for the rebels to acquire weapons of their own, is unable to protect them. Officials involved in the Nato campaign say the frustration on the ground reflects tension between what the insurgents want and the mandate laid out by the UN. “Nato nations are in Libya to protect civilians. The rebels have proved themselves to be very courageous but we are not there to act as their air force,” said one. Officials say they are concerned about creating a situation where civilians are caught up in chaotic fighting between rebels and Gaddafi’s forces. This has been heightened by fears of a lack of co-ordination between rebels and Nato commanders responsible for approving air strikes. Libya Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Muammar Gaddafi Nato guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Reporters among 8,000 staff under most threat from World Service merger with News after licence fee deal BBC News tabled proposals for widespread cuts to its 8,000 news staff in the UK and abroad, as part a plan to make annual savings of £89m. Senior members were informed of the plans tabled by Helen Boaden, the director of BBC News, to make the savings by 2016-7 – with the bulk from cutting reporting jobs. The cuts amount to a 20% saving from a total budget of close to £500m. The BBC will also merge the previously separately funded BBC World Service into the main News division, as it contends with the consequences of a licence fee freeze agreed with the coalition government last autumn. Exact numbers of staff to be cut were not disclosed, but more detail is expected to be revealed next week when the proposals are fleshed out. However, if job losses were to match the 20% saving sought, more than 1,500 journalists may be forced to go. It is expected job losses will affect reporters on regional and domestic news as well as international field correspondents, who are most likely to be impacted by the News-World Service merger. The plan is that some World Service journalists will take over BBC News jobs. BBC News employs about 3,000 staff in London and overseas and a further 3,000 around the UK providing coverage in the nations and regions. The World Service employs an additional 2,000. “It should be remembered these are just proposals, they have not yet been taken to the BBC Trust and anything could happen,” said one source. “There may not be a viable argument that just because a World Service person is somewhere they can automatically step into a BBC News role”. BBC News and the World Service – for which the corporation is officially taking over funding from the Foreign Office in 2013 – are set to be brought together in the redeveloped Broadcasting House in central London. A large number of regional editors from the World Service are also thought likely to go. The channel is also planning to air fewer features and outside broadcasts using a lot of resource, such as truck-based broadcasting, which are very expensive to operate. Martin Bell, the former BBC foreign correspondent, said in an article for the British Journalism Review that the BBC needed to cut back on the “expensive and wasteful practice” of sending news anchors such as Huw Edwards “somewhere near the scene of a news event and pretending that this adds value and authenticity”. Other savings being suggested include cutting specific business and sports segments in bulletins and programmes such as Today and instead using specialist reporters – such as Robert Peston, the business editor, or David Bond, the sports editor, to fill in as required The BBC Trust is thought to be informally aware of the proposals although it will not officially receive a full detailed plan until next month. “We are not going to get drawn into a running commentary, no decisions have been taken and therefore these claims remain speculation,” said a spokesman for BBC News. “Any decisions coming out of the process would be subject to approval by the BBC Trust.” In April MediaGuardian.co.uk revealed internal documents that outlined a range of ideas for cost-saving including a “slimmed-down” BBC News channel concentrating on “developing news and headlines” and increasing commercial income from its journalism. Other proposals being discussed include making the BBC Parliament channel, the most expensive the BBC operates in terms of the number of viewers that it obtains, “more cost effective and accessible” and making more money from selling BBC News output to overseas broadcasters “without damaging our brand and reputation”. BBC BBC World Service BBC licence fee Helen Boaden Radio industry Television industry BBC Trust Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …