Survey reveals clients not being given proper help with eating or drinking and being left in bed for long periods The basic human rights of some older people receiving care at home are being abused, with “worrying” instances of the elderly being left in soiled beds or clothing for long periods, claims a report. The Equality and Human Rights Commission revealed it had identified a number of significant problems, such as old people not being washed properly, not being given proper help with eating or drinking, and being left in bed for 17 hours in some cases, as part of an EHRC inquiry into home care in England. Staff turnover in the sector was “huge” with one woman said to have had 32 different carers over a two-week period. Some home care visits were just 15 minutes, forcing people to choose between having a cooked meal or a wash. Others were put to bed at 5pm and not helped to get up again until 10am the following morning, said the report. Lack of privacy was also a problem, with one person complaining of being dressed by care staff in front of his bungalow window, and another in front of family members. But there was a reluctance to complain because many did not know how to, or were fearful of repercussions. “The full extent of the potential human rights breaches is likely to be masked by the fear of complaining and the low expectations about the quality of home care that many older people believe they are entitled to,” said the EHRC, due to publish the findings of its inquiry in November. “One in five older people who responded to the call for evidence said that they would not complain because they didn’t know how to, or for fear of repercussions. “In addition, we are exploring what protection and support is in place for whistleblowers who want to expose poor or abusive practices,” said the report, drawn from more than 500 submissions from individuals, organisations and home care staff. Social care Long-term care Equality Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Carers Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media (h/t Karoli) It’s rare on the Sunday shows to give a Democrat uninterrupted air time and even rarer still the chance to respond to a Republican’s segment on earlier. Watch the shows, most of the time Democrats appear with a Republican at his/her side and almost never given the last word. Which is why Chuck Schumer appearing after Mitch McConnell to refute all the same tired talking points is such a novel experience. Schumer says EXACTLY what every Democrat should say the minute a camera is pointed in their direction: “Hey GOP, where are the jobs???” In the five months of the Republican majority, we’ve had nary a single jobs bill, but bills reducing regulations on corporations and increasing them on women seeking reproductive health . But that’s not what Americans wanted…the Republicans promised jobs and that’s what Americans are looking for. The New York Democrat said his colleagues in the Senate would be introducing a number of measures aimed at creating jobs – including one that provides tax breaks to companies that hire new workers. “That is aimed at sort of bringing our Republican colleagues along to do something” about the struggling U.S. economy, which created just 54,000 jobs in May, Schumer said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.” “If they are against a business tax cut to help employment, they have always been for business tax cuts in the past, you gotta wonder, maybe they don’t want the economy to grow,” said Schumer, the number three Democrat in the Senate. Listen to Bob Schieffer, still holding onto those Republican talking points that the MOST important issue facing us is the blasted deficit, absolutely incredulous of the Democrats plan of investing in the infrastructure, of a strong jobs program , calling it “grandiose”. Um…Bob, how would you have characterized the New Deal that Roosevelt proposed? That’s exactly what the country needed to put the economy back on track. The Democrats’ plan is not nearly that extensive, and in a hat tip to the whiny, petulant Republicans, includes tax breaks.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) thinks that the some of the massive wildfires in Arizona are the fault of illegal immigrants. “We are concerned about, particularly, areas down on the border where there is substantial evidence that some of these fires are caused by people who have crossed our border illegally,” the former Republican presidential candidate said at a press conference Saturday . “They have set fires because the want to signal others. They have set fires to keep warm and they have set fires in order to divert law enforcement agents and agencies from them.” “The answer to that part of the problem is to get a secure border,” he added. UPDATE : John Amato: John McCain, who once led an effort for immigration reform until he was beat back by Rush Limbaugh, FOX News and hate talk AM radio now has joined them in their demonization of illegals. We don’t know what caused the fires in Arizona as of yet, but McCain saw an opportunity and grabbed it. The Arizona senator, however, did not say what the evidence is, prompting a swift rebuke from Latino civil rights advocates. “It’s easier to fan the flames of intolerance, especially in Arizona,” said Randy Parraz, a civil rights advocate who ran unsuccessfully against McCain as a Democratic candidate in 2010. Parraz called McCain’s remarks “careless and reckless” but not entirely surprising given the political climate in Arizona. The Latino advocate is co-founder of Citizens for a Better Arizona, a group trying the recall the legislator who authored the state’s controversial anti-illegal immigration law. Parraz said McCain “should know better” than to make such an accusation without presenting any facts. – Parraz said it is particularly distressing that immigrants are being blamed for destructive fires at a time when many are also being targeted given the state’s unemployment, foreclosure and other economic issues. “People are looking for someone to blame,” he said, claiming it is too easy and convenient to target what he called one of Arizona’s “most vulnerable populations.” Angelo Falcon, the president of the National Institute for Latino Policy, criticized McCain for what he called “increasingly blatant” political opportunism. “The degree of irresponsible political pandering by Sen. McCain has no limits,” Falcon said in an email to CNN. “With the lack of evidence, he might as well also blame aliens from outer space for the fires.”
Continue reading …• Fourth sub-par round leaves Ulsterman 16 under • Jason Day second, Lee Westwood tied for third Next stop world domination, but on a glorious afternoon at Congressional Country Club the boy wonder of European golf was content with prize he had just won. Rory McIlroy, 2011 US Open champion. How does that sound? Pretty good, but for those who wanted more there was plenty. How about Rory McIlroy, winner of the 2011 US Open championship with a record low score of 268, 16 under par. How about Rory McIlroy, winner of the 2011 US Open by a margin of eight shots. How about Rory McIlroy, who followed the disappointment of his Augusta National collapse just two months ago with a display that will go down in the annals alongside that of Tiger Woods at Pebble Beach in 2000 – a performance acknowledged by many as the greatest in the tournament’s history. By such celestial standards, McIlroy might have come up short but it was a close-run thing as the Northern Irishman exerted his dominance over a famously brutish golf course, as well as a collection of the world’s best. YE Yang, a PGA Championship winner, Lee Westwood, the world No2, Sergio García, a fallen idol on the road to recovery, and Jason Day, one of the leading lights of golf’s new generation – great players reduced to the status of Holywood extras. If only McIlroy had stayed at home this week they would have contested a hell of a golf tournament. But he didn’t, and they didn’t. Their consolation was a top-10 finish at a major championship and a ringside seat on the day potential greatness became greatness. “Rory is going to have a great career, there is no question about that. He has got all the components,” said Jack Nicklaus, the 18-time major champion who has become something of a mentor to McIlroy over the last few years. “He is a great kid. He is humble when he needs to be, and confident when he needs to be confident. He’s a got a great swing. He looks a little cocksure when he walks, which you need to have. I like it.” Nicklaus is not alone. Over the past four days the American public, and the American media, have treated McIlroy like one of their own. He has been cheered on to the driving range, and cheered on the practise putting green. Most of all he has been cheered on the golf course, never louder than he was on Sunday. No wonder. Eight shots ahead overnight, then immediately extended with a birdie at the 1st, where he hit an exquisite approach shot to eight feet and holed the putt. Another great approach, and another birdie, at the 5th extended the lead into double digits. Thereafter, it was simply a case of cruising home, although McIlroy could not resist a few flourishes. At the 10th – a brutish par-three requiring the players to hit their tee shots over a vast expanse of water to a distant green – he hit a six-iron to three inches. He did not miss the putt. So much for Westwood’s contention, uttered in hope and not in malice on Saturday, that “big leads are sometimes hard to play with”. Not when you play as McIlroy did. Did the Northern Irishman drop a shot at the 12th hole? Yes he did. Did it matter? Of course not. By then he was in full procession mode, smiling, waving to the crowds and, one has to believe, breathing deep sighs of relief at having finally reached the destiny many have predicted for him since his arrival on the golfing scene. When he stepped on to the 18th tee he held an eight-shot advantage over Day, knowing that anything less than a sextuple bogey 10 would be enough to win. In the event he needed only four shots for a final round of 69 to add to his three previous rounds of 65,66 and 68. When the final putt dropped, he feel into the arms of his father, Gerry, and when he stepped off the green it was into a hug from his friend and countryman Graeme McDowell, who won this tournament last year. All hail golf’s new global superpower, Northern Ireland. McIlroy now has one major championship to his name. The temptation to ask how many more is hard to resist but the truth is no-one knows. More than one? Five? Ten? Padraig Harrington swung for the fences, as they say in baseball, declaring that the Northern Irishman and not Tiger Woods presented the biggest threat to Nicklaus’ record of 18 major championship victories. Harrington is famously tee-total, never having let a drop of alcohol cross his lips, so it can assumed he was speaking from the heart. But surely this was hyperbole above and beyond the call of cross-border Irish co-operation. Yet McIlroy is still only 22 years old. He is fit, he is ambitious and, most importantly of all, he now knows he can win on golf’s biggest stage. The sky truly is the limit. US Open Golf 2011 US Open Rory McIlroy Lawrence Donegan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media As C&L’s Jon Perr wrote earlier this year, today’s “tea partiers”, otherwise known as the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, which seems to be about all that remains of them right now, would have considered Ronald Reagan a RINO , or Republican in name only. That didn’t stop Tennessee Representative and one of my least favorite flame throwers Marsha Blackburn from praising St. Ronnie at the Republican Leadership Conference this weekend as the one who’s “values” they should “coalesce around.” BLACKBURN: Well it is absolutely fantastic to be here with you in New Orleans for the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, and I am thrilled that we are holding this during the centennial of Ronald Reagan’s birth. Those values that he coalesced around, faith, family, freedom, hope, opportunity; those are the values that he took with him to Washington in 1980. Those are the values that we need to take back to Washington today. And we need to remember that those are the values that need to be in the White House in November 2012 and we need to get out there and win this one for the Gipper! Whoo-hooo! Let’s win one for St. Ronnie! I’m not holding my breath for anyone in our corporate media to ever ask any of them about whether their patron saint would survive a GOP primary today now that the John Birch Society, libertarian, extreme right wing of their party has apparently become the mainstream.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Last night at the closing keynote session for Netroots Nation, we were entertained by the fabulous singer-songwriter Jill Sobule (her official site is here ), who wrote this song especially for the convention. It’s not safe for work. But it may well become a progressive anthem for the 2012 election cycle. I met Jill briefly, and she said she’s a big C&L fan. Well, here’s back atcha, Jill. Here’s the lyric: They say we want our America back Our America back Our America back When they say we want our America back What the f–k do they mean? Remember the Garden of Eden Before Eve hung out with that snake? You could walk down the street And not worry about thieves All the kids could go trick or treating Then those foreigners started comin’ in Like those Germans in 1790 Then the Irish arrived, the potato blight The neighborhood started changing Life was better We lived right Life had a paler shade of white When they say we want our America back We want our America back Before there was Ellis Island And that statue we got from the French And that’s whore’s still alerting The strangers she’s flirting Inviting them into our beds The Guineas, the coolies, the wetbacks, the Jews The gays and the terrorists And who let in that woman looks after my kids And the one who is cleaning my nest Life was righteous Life was clean Send them back including me When they say they want our America back Our America back, our America back When they say they want our America back What the f–k does it mean? Before the gays had the agenda Before the slaves were free Before that man from Kenya Took the presidency We want our America back Our America back Our America back When they say they want our America back What the f–k do they mean?
Continue reading …Each week Ross Rubin contributes Switched On , a column about consumer technology. Spring proved cruel for the sparse population of products that combine e-paper and LCD displays. Startup Entourage announced that it was discontinuing its Edge dual-screen e-reader / tablet combo. And then Barnes & Noble closed the book on the original Nook to introduce a successor that had only one screen and one button. In doing so, it leaped over (or is that under?) even the Kindle’s minimalism. E-readers have followed an unusual demographic adoption curve for a consumer electronics product. The first buyers were, like those of many other tech products, more affluent, but the majority of them were also older and female in keeping with the book-buying habits of physical books. They were attracted to the crisp display and high contrast of e-paper displays. And many were (and continue to be) attracted by a focused product that allowed them to concentrate on the text without distraction of other media type, the Web or thousands of apps. Continue reading Switched On: e-readers drive to digital distraction Switched On: e-readers drive to digital distraction originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:15:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …The area in the centre of the Greek capital is playing host to thousands of angry demonstrators Athenians used to stop off at Syntagma Square for the shopping, the shiny rows of upmarket boutiques. Now they arrive in their tens of thousands to protest. Swarming out of the metro station, they emerge into a village of tents, pamphleteers and a booming public address system. Since 25 May, when demonstrators first converged here, this has become an open-air concert – only one where bands have been supplanted by speakers and music swapped for an angry politics. On this square just below the Greek parliament and ringed by flashy hotels, thousands sit through speech after speech. Old-time socialists, American economists just passing through, members of the crowd: they each get three minutes with the mic, and most of them use the time alternatively to slag off the politicians and to egg on their fellow protesters. “Being here makes me feel 18 again,” begins one man, his polo shirt stretched tight over his paunch, before talking about his worries about his pension. The closer you get to the Vouli, the parliament, the more raucous it becomes. Jammed up against the railings, a crowd is clapping and chanting: “Thieves! Thieves!” There is another mic here, and it’s grabbed by a man wearing a mask of deputy prime minister Theodoros Pangalos: “My friends, we all ate together.” He is quoting the socialist politician, who claimed on TV last year that everyone bore the responsibility for the squandering of public money. Pangalos may have intended his remark as the Greek equivalent of George Osborne’s remark that “We’re all in it together”, but here they’re not having it.”You lying bastard!” They roar back. “You’re so fat you ate the entire supermarket.” This is an odd alloy of earnestness and pantomime, to be sure, but it’s something else too: Syntagma Square has become the new frontline of the battle against European austerity. And as prime minister George Papandreou battles first to keep his own job, and then to win MPs’ support for the most extreme package of spending cuts, tax rises and privatisations ever faced by any developed country, what happens between this square and the parliament matters for the rest of the eurozone. The banner wavers here know this. In the age of TV satellite vans and YouTube, they paint signs and coin slogans with half an eye on the export market. Papandreou’s face is plastered over placards that congratulate him in English for being “Goldman Sachs’ employee of the year”. Flags jibe at the rive gauche : “The French are sleeping – they’re dreaming of ’68.” Most of the time, the anger is expressed sardonically. A friend shows me an app on her phone that gives updates on the latest political and industrial actions – its name translates as iStrike. But it’s not hard to see how this situation might boil over. “Are you an indignado?” I ask Nikkos Kokkalis, using the term coined by young Spanish protesters to express outrage at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s austerity plans, now swiped by the Greeks. “I’m a super-indignado,” he almost shouts. A 29-year-old graduate who lives with his parents, Nikkos has never done a proper job – just menial tasks for a website and an internship for a TV station. “There are 300 people over there,” he waves at the MPs’ offices. “Most of them make decisions without asking the people.” For their part, protesters with salaries and wrinkles are fuming at the spending cuts already inflicted on them. Chryssa Michalopolou is a teacher who calculates that her annual pay has already gone down by the equivalent of one and a half months, while her living costs have shot up, thanks to rising taxes and inflation. Does she buy the government’s line that it needs to trim the public sector? “After 15 years’ service, I’m only on €1,200 (£1,056) a month,” she says. “I didn’t see any boom; I simply paid my taxes and now I am being punished.” On display here is more than a personal grievance; it also reveals a glaring truth that politicians across Europe have so far ignored. In their efforts to hammer out a second loan agreement for Greece, eurozone ministers are focusing on the differences between bond swaps and bond rollovers, the tensions between Berlin and the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank or how far continental banks can withstand another massive shock. Taken for granted in these negotiations is that the Greeks (and by implication, the Irish and the Portuguese) must accept more austerity. Yet in Athens, whether on the streets or even at a policy-making level, these technical details barely figure on the agenda. It’s not just that the terms are different, the entire debate is too. Here, the argument concerns how much more austerity the Greek economy, its people and even the government can take – because all three are already at breaking point. When Greece was all but locked out of the financial markets last May, Papandreou accepted a €110bn loan from Europe and the IMF. The idea was that the money would tide the country over for a year, in which time his government would at least start sorting out its public finances. For Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and the rest of Europe, the loan came with some pretty tight strings attached: they charged the Greeks interest well above the official eurozone rate, and set demanding budget targets for the Pasok socialist government. Freefall A year in, and the deal is not working. Greece has been in recession for two years and on official forecasts this will be its third. When I ask Athens University economist Yanis Varoufakis to describe the economy, he shoots back one sentence: “It’s in freefall.” Sitting on the balcony of his flat behind the Acropolis, he throws out some statistics: 50,000 businesses went bankrupt last year, industrial production fell 20% and will drop another 12% this year. Unemployment has surged, so that one in six of the workforce doesn’t have a job. These are the sort of figures associated with a depression, and the predictable result is that the public finances are getting worse. Greece’s debt has ballooned to 153% of GDP; on Varoufakis’s projections, even if ministers manage to make all their promised cuts, the government will owe three times the entire national income. Behind these numbers lie the stories of a society in distress. One man talks about his daughter who works in the in-store restaurant of a large supermarket outside Athens; at closing time, she and her workmates have started giving out the unsold meals to the newly unemployed – the 21st-century equivalent of a soup kitchen. An employee of a local council notes that they pick up 17% less rubbish than a year ago, simply because people have cut back on food. The owner of an art gallery tells me her son has just started his first job; holding a master’s in accountancy, he works six hours a day in a mobile-phone shop. The lazy accusation to hurl at Greece is that it had a bloated public sector and so was bound to come a cropper. Not so, says Varoufakis: the country has a public sector in line with the rest of Europe (although, nearly everyone I speak to agrees, one that does not work as well), but takes in taxes some 35% below where they should be. Wealthy Greeks have always treated the country’s tax system like a church collection plate: what they give is strictly optional. This gap was covered up for as long as the Greek state could get cheap credit; then in 2008 it became glaringly obvious. The other problem covered up during the boom years was the rotting away of the industrial base. That too is now the subject of angry public discussion. I take a tour of the shipbuilding yard in Perama, just outside Athens. Greece has the largest commercial fleet in the world, and yet Perama is utterly silent. There is a rusting hulk, abandoned a few years ago, when those who commissioned it could no longer afford to pay for it. A decade ago, this yard employed 7,000 workers – now it has around 500. There was a time when assembling small cargo vessels was seen as pedestrian work; last year, the yard was contracted to build two boats, and the jobs were fought over. A few minutes away lives Tassos Alexandris, who was laid off from Perama in 2008. The hall of his flat is decorated with needlepoint; inside are pictures of the Virgin Mary put up by his wife, Nikki. She is ill, and his 26-year-old daughter has worked for six months in her entire career. How do they make ends meet? Nikki snorts with laughter. “The electricity connection is inside the flat; otherwise the board would have cut us off,” begins Tassos. His mother-in-law lives upstairs and, while he is too ashamed to ask her for food, she allows him to raid her fridge at night. They had a small green Citroen, but couldn’t afford to keep it. Now he runs a motorbike, although with no plates and no taxes. “I can’t sleep at night for worry,” he says. “It has affected every part of our lives: personal, sexual, the lot.” How many families in this block do they think are in a similar situation? Nikki tots them up: “80%.” Tassos doesn’t just support the protesters of Syntagma; he thinks they will go further. “Don’t be surprised if Athens goes up in flames,” the 50-year old says. “And don’t be sad, either.” His words initially sound melodramatic, but the anger keeps coming up. “Politicians now walk around with bodyguards,” says Aris Chatzistefanou, the co-director of Debtocracy, a film about the Greek crisis that has become a sensation. He quotes a newspaper report of how restaurateurs are taking down those cheesy framed photos of dining politicians, of how one government spokesman went to dinner a few weeks ago only for the rest of the restaurant to start shouting “You are eating the blood of the people”. Political arithmetic The anger against the austerity and the politicians imposing it is palpable; whether it will translate into political success is debatable. Papandreou may be one of the most hated men in Greece, but there is no mainstream politician who has an alternative to acting under creditor’s orders. This isn’t about an electorate taking on a government, either, but the impossible political arithmetic of disparate groups of Greeks on one side versus the IMF, the European Central Bank and 16 other eurozone members on the other. Run that by the protesters of Athens, though, and even the older, more pragmatic ones have an answer. “We may lose,” one grey-haired trade unionist said to me. “But what matters is how you lose.” Greece Europe European debt crisis European banks Europe Aditya Chakrabortty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The area in the centre of the Greek capital is playing host to thousands of angry demonstrators Athenians used to stop off at Syntagma Square for the shopping, the shiny rows of upmarket boutiques. Now they arrive in their tens of thousands to protest. Swarming out of the metro station, they emerge into a village of tents, pamphleteers and a booming public address system. Since 25 May, when demonstrators first converged here, this has become an open-air concert – only one where bands have been supplanted by speakers and music swapped for an angry politics. On this square just below the Greek parliament and ringed by flashy hotels, thousands sit through speech after speech. Old-time socialists, American economists just passing through, members of the crowd: they each get three minutes with the mic, and most of them use the time alternatively to slag off the politicians and to egg on their fellow protesters. “Being here makes me feel 18 again,” begins one man, his polo shirt stretched tight over his paunch, before talking about his worries about his pension. The closer you get to the Vouli, the parliament, the more raucous it becomes. Jammed up against the railings, a crowd is clapping and chanting: “Thieves! Thieves!” There is another mic here, and it’s grabbed by a man wearing a mask of deputy prime minister Theodoros Pangalos: “My friends, we all ate together.” He is quoting the socialist politician, who claimed on TV last year that everyone bore the responsibility for the squandering of public money. Pangalos may have intended his remark as the Greek equivalent of George Osborne’s remark that “We’re all in it together”, but here they’re not having it.”You lying bastard!” They roar back. “You’re so fat you ate the entire supermarket.” This is an odd alloy of earnestness and pantomime, to be sure, but it’s something else too: Syntagma Square has become the new frontline of the battle against European austerity. And as prime minister George Papandreou battles first to keep his own job, and then to win MPs’ support for the most extreme package of spending cuts, tax rises and privatisations ever faced by any developed country, what happens between this square and the parliament matters for the rest of the eurozone. The banner wavers here know this. In the age of TV satellite vans and YouTube, they paint signs and coin slogans with half an eye on the export market. Papandreou’s face is plastered over placards that congratulate him in English for being “Goldman Sachs’ employee of the year”. Flags jibe at the rive gauche : “The French are sleeping – they’re dreaming of ’68.” Most of the time, the anger is expressed sardonically. A friend shows me an app on her phone that gives updates on the latest political and industrial actions – its name translates as iStrike. But it’s not hard to see how this situation might boil over. “Are you an indignado?” I ask Nikkos Kokkalis, using the term coined by young Spanish protesters to express outrage at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s austerity plans, now swiped by the Greeks. “I’m a super-indignado,” he almost shouts. A 29-year-old graduate who lives with his parents, Nikkos has never done a proper job – just menial tasks for a website and an internship for a TV station. “There are 300 people over there,” he waves at the MPs’ offices. “Most of them make decisions without asking the people.” For their part, protesters with salaries and wrinkles are fuming at the spending cuts already inflicted on them. Chryssa Michalopolou is a teacher who calculates that her annual pay has already gone down by the equivalent of one and a half months, while her living costs have shot up, thanks to rising taxes and inflation. Does she buy the government’s line that it needs to trim the public sector? “After 15 years’ service, I’m only on €1,200 (£1,056) a month,” she says. “I didn’t see any boom; I simply paid my taxes and now I am being punished.” On display here is more than a personal grievance; it also reveals a glaring truth that politicians across Europe have so far ignored. In their efforts to hammer out a second loan agreement for Greece, eurozone ministers are focusing on the differences between bond swaps and bond rollovers, the tensions between Berlin and the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank or how far continental banks can withstand another massive shock. Taken for granted in these negotiations is that the Greeks (and by implication, the Irish and the Portuguese) must accept more austerity. Yet in Athens, whether on the streets or even at a policy-making level, these technical details barely figure on the agenda. It’s not just that the terms are different, the entire debate is too. Here, the argument concerns how much more austerity the Greek economy, its people and even the government can take – because all three are already at breaking point. When Greece was all but locked out of the financial markets last May, Papandreou accepted a €110bn loan from Europe and the IMF. The idea was that the money would tide the country over for a year, in which time his government would at least start sorting out its public finances. For Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and the rest of Europe, the loan came with some pretty tight strings attached: they charged the Greeks interest well above the official eurozone rate, and set demanding budget targets for the Pasok socialist government. Freefall A year in, and the deal is not working. Greece has been in recession for two years and on official forecasts this will be its third. When I ask Athens University economist Yanis Varoufakis to describe the economy, he shoots back one sentence: “It’s in freefall.” Sitting on the balcony of his flat behind the Acropolis, he throws out some statistics: 50,000 businesses went bankrupt last year, industrial production fell 20% and will drop another 12% this year. Unemployment has surged, so that one in six of the workforce doesn’t have a job. These are the sort of figures associated with a depression, and the predictable result is that the public finances are getting worse. Greece’s debt has ballooned to 153% of GDP; on Varoufakis’s projections, even if ministers manage to make all their promised cuts, the government will owe three times the entire national income. Behind these numbers lie the stories of a society in distress. One man talks about his daughter who works in the in-store restaurant of a large supermarket outside Athens; at closing time, she and her workmates have started giving out the unsold meals to the newly unemployed – the 21st-century equivalent of a soup kitchen. An employee of a local council notes that they pick up 17% less rubbish than a year ago, simply because people have cut back on food. The owner of an art gallery tells me her son has just started his first job; holding a master’s in accountancy, he works six hours a day in a mobile-phone shop. The lazy accusation to hurl at Greece is that it had a bloated public sector and so was bound to come a cropper. Not so, says Varoufakis: the country has a public sector in line with the rest of Europe (although, nearly everyone I speak to agrees, one that does not work as well), but takes in taxes some 35% below where they should be. Wealthy Greeks have always treated the country’s tax system like a church collection plate: what they give is strictly optional. This gap was covered up for as long as the Greek state could get cheap credit; then in 2008 it became glaringly obvious. The other problem covered up during the boom years was the rotting away of the industrial base. That too is now the subject of angry public discussion. I take a tour of the shipbuilding yard in Perama, just outside Athens. Greece has the largest commercial fleet in the world, and yet Perama is utterly silent. There is a rusting hulk, abandoned a few years ago, when those who commissioned it could no longer afford to pay for it. A decade ago, this yard employed 7,000 workers – now it has around 500. There was a time when assembling small cargo vessels was seen as pedestrian work; last year, the yard was contracted to build two boats, and the jobs were fought over. A few minutes away lives Tassos Alexandris, who was laid off from Perama in 2008. The hall of his flat is decorated with needlepoint; inside are pictures of the Virgin Mary put up by his wife, Nikki. She is ill, and his 26-year-old daughter has worked for six months in her entire career. How do they make ends meet? Nikki snorts with laughter. “The electricity connection is inside the flat; otherwise the board would have cut us off,” begins Tassos. His mother-in-law lives upstairs and, while he is too ashamed to ask her for food, she allows him to raid her fridge at night. They had a small green Citroen, but couldn’t afford to keep it. Now he runs a motorbike, although with no plates and no taxes. “I can’t sleep at night for worry,” he says. “It has affected every part of our lives: personal, sexual, the lot.” How many families in this block do they think are in a similar situation? Nikki tots them up: “80%.” Tassos doesn’t just support the protesters of Syntagma; he thinks they will go further. “Don’t be surprised if Athens goes up in flames,” the 50-year old says. “And don’t be sad, either.” His words initially sound melodramatic, but the anger keeps coming up. “Politicians now walk around with bodyguards,” says Aris Chatzistefanou, the co-director of Debtocracy, a film about the Greek crisis that has become a sensation. He quotes a newspaper report of how restaurateurs are taking down those cheesy framed photos of dining politicians, of how one government spokesman went to dinner a few weeks ago only for the rest of the restaurant to start shouting “You are eating the blood of the people”. Political arithmetic The anger against the austerity and the politicians imposing it is palpable; whether it will translate into political success is debatable. Papandreou may be one of the most hated men in Greece, but there is no mainstream politician who has an alternative to acting under creditor’s orders. This isn’t about an electorate taking on a government, either, but the impossible political arithmetic of disparate groups of Greeks on one side versus the IMF, the European Central Bank and 16 other eurozone members on the other. Run that by the protesters of Athens, though, and even the older, more pragmatic ones have an answer. “We may lose,” one grey-haired trade unionist said to me. “But what matters is how you lose.” Greece Europe European debt crisis European banks Europe Aditya Chakrabortty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Alliance says ‘weapons systems failure’ caused strike to miss intended target and may have led to civilian casualties Nato has said it was responsible for an air strike that killed civilians in Tripoli over the weekend. “A military missile site was the intended target of air strikes in Tripoli last night,” a statement said. “However, it appears that one weapon did not strike the intended target and that there may have been a weapons system failure which may have caused a number of civilian casualties.” Earlier the Libyan government had said that one of Nato’s missiles had struck a house in a residential area of Tripoli, killing a number of civilians, including two children. The attack is the biggest blunder by coalition forces during the four-month campaign, at a time when Nato has been trying to increase the tempo of operations against the Libyan leader. “Nato regrets the loss of innocent civilian lives and takes great care in conducting strikes against a regime determined to use violence against its own citizens,” said Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, commander of Operation Unified Protector. “Although we are still determining the specifics of this event, indications are that a weapons system failure may have caused this incident,” he added. The Guardian understands that investigators are focusing on French aircraft flying over Tripoli to target a potential missile site. RAF planes were not thought involved. Nato was debriefing the pilots who flew sorties, as well as reviewing data from their aircraft. A Nato official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was confusion over the exact location, and pointed out that the district in question was an anti-Gaddafi stronghold. Reporters based in Tripoli were taken by government officials to the scene of the blast and then to a hospital, where they were shown the bodies of four people said to have been killed in the strike, including two infants. Associated Press said journalists were escorted back to the site during the day, where children’s toys, teacups and dust-covered mattresses could be seen amid the rubble. Foreign journalists in Tripoli are not allowed to travel and report freely and are almost always shadowed by government minders. Libya’s deputy foreign minister, Khaled Kaim, said: “There was intentional and deliberate targeting of the civilian houses. This is another sign of the brutality of the west.” Nato Libya Middle East Africa Nick Hopkins guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …