Click here to view this media If you’ve heard bloggers use the term “Grand Bargain” and you don’t understand what it means, it refers to the theoretical packaging of a very big deal on third-rail issues that’s so unpleasant for both sides, it’s in effect a political wash. The idea is, it’s reform that doesn’t leave either side at a disadvantage. (Please note that Obama’s intentions to do so were known in February 2009 .) On our side, Social Security and Medicare cuts; on their side, tax increases. Anyway, it looks like the Grand Bargain is coming unraveled – but we can’t relax just yet since it’s been reported that the chained CPI for Social Security benefits is included in Joe Biden’s smaller plan, the one to which Republicans have already agreed. This isn’t a victory for eleventy-dimensional chess, because no matter what, we still have a Democratic president offering Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid cuts and validating the right-wing view of the universe, and we’re still talking about spending cuts during a prolonged recession — as if they’ll help. We’ll see what the White House is asking Democrats to support as part of the final deal after today’s debt ceiling talks. Stay tuned. House Speaker John A. Boehner abandoned efforts Saturday night to reach a comprehensive debt-reduction deal worth more than $4 trillion in savings, telling President Obama that a midsize package was the only politically possible alternative to avoid a first-ever default on the nation’s mounting national debt. Boehner (R-Ohio) told Obama — who is hosting a key meeting Sunday evening on the debt issue — that their efforts to “go big,” as the speaker says, were stymied by the toughest issues: taxes and entitlements. Democrats continued to insist on tax reforms that would not pass muster in the conservative-dominated House, and Republicans wanted cuts to programs such as Medicare and Social Security that Obama and Senate Democrats would oppose. “Despite good-faith efforts to find common ground, the White House will not pursue a bigger debt reduction agreement without tax hikes. I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure, based on the cuts identified in the Biden-led negotiations, that still meets our call for spending reforms and cuts greater than the amount of any debt limit increase,” Boehner said in a statement released less than 24 hours before the Obama meeting is to take place.
Continue reading …Australia’s PM Julia Gillard faces tough fight to convince public before parliamentary vote Australia has unveiled its most sweeping economic reform in decades, including a plan to tax carbon emissions from the country’s worst polluters. As the largest emissions trading scheme outside Europe, it revives hopes of stronger global climate action. The country’s prime minister, Julia Gillard, said 500 companies, including steel and aluminium manufacturers, would pay a A$23 (£15.40) per tonne carbon tax from next year, rising by 2.5% a year and moving to a market-based trading scheme in 2015. “It’s time to get on with this, we are going to get this done,” Gillard said after a tough battle to win political support for ae scheme that has polarised voters and business. A parliamentary vote on the scheme is expected before the end of the year. Australia is the developed world’s worst per-capita greenhouse gas emitter because of its heavy reliance on cheap coal for power generation. Emissions are likely to rise in the booming economy without a carbon tax, the government says. The stakes are high for Gillard’s Labor party, which relies on the support of Greens and independents for a one-seat lower house majority. Her popularity has slumped to record lows over the scheme. Gillard will now try to convince voters opposed to the plan before the parliamentary vote, and try to deflect a campaign against it by the hardest-hit businesses. “It is absolutely critical that the government sells this very effectively,” said Tony Wood, director of the energy programme at the Grattan Institute policy thinktank. Australian retail and clean energy stocks were expected to be among the plan’s winners, and airlines and miners among the losers, but analysts said financial markets overall were likely to take the policy in their stride. The scheme aims to cut national emissions by 5% of 2000 levels by 2020, which would mean a cut of about 160m tonnes. The package already has the broad support of the Greens and independents, although crossbenchers said they had yet to support extra measures to protect jobs in the steel and coal industries. Parliament has rejected two previous attempts to tax carbon emissions in 2009 and any fresh rebuff in the next vote, expected around October, would seriously threaten Gillard’s government. A vigorous campaign by the conservative opposition and business groups could erode public support and frighten political backers before elections due by 2013. “This tax is going to go up and up and up as time goes by. I think this package is going to compound the trust problem that has dogged the prime minister. This package certainly sets up the next election to be a referendum on the carbon tax,” said the conservative opposition leader, Tony Abbott. Abbott has seized upon voter fears of a new tax and higher costs from a scheme that aims to transform how the nation generates and uses energy across the economy. To neutralise opposition, Gillard said more than A$24bn to be raised from pollution permit sales over the next three years would go to households through generous tax cuts worth more than A$15bn. Australia’s scheme will cover 60% of carbon pollution apart from exempted agricultural and light vehicle emissions, with treasury models showing it would boost the consumer price index by 0.7% in its first year. It could also aid global efforts to fight carbon pollution, which have largely stalled since the US president, Barack Obama, last year ruled out a federal climate bill in his present term. Outside the EU, only New Zealand has a national carbon scheme. “Other countries will look at one of the most carbon polluting economies on the planet that has made one huge stride forward towards putting a price on carbon,” said John Connor, chief executive of The Climate Institute. Australia said it hoped to link its scheme, which would cost A$4.4bn to implement after household and industry compensation, to other international carbon markets and land abatement schemes when its emissions market was running. Europe’s system, which covers the 27 EU member states plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, has forced power producers to pay for carbon emissions, driving cuts where power plants were forced to switch to cleaner natural gas or biomass. Australia Climate change Carbon emissions Pollution Emissions trading Mining Mining Coal Energy Fossil fuels guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Australia’s PM Julia Gillard faces tough fight to convince public before parliamentary vote Australia has unveiled its most sweeping economic reform in decades, including a plan to tax carbon emissions from the country’s worst polluters. As the largest emissions trading scheme outside Europe, it revives hopes of stronger global climate action. The country’s prime minister, Julia Gillard, said 500 companies, including steel and aluminium manufacturers, would pay a A$23 (£15.40) per tonne carbon tax from next year, rising by 2.5% a year and moving to a market-based trading scheme in 2015. “It’s time to get on with this, we are going to get this done,” Gillard said after a tough battle to win political support for ae scheme that has polarised voters and business. A parliamentary vote on the scheme is expected before the end of the year. Australia is the developed world’s worst per-capita greenhouse gas emitter because of its heavy reliance on cheap coal for power generation. Emissions are likely to rise in the booming economy without a carbon tax, the government says. The stakes are high for Gillard’s Labor party, which relies on the support of Greens and independents for a one-seat lower house majority. Her popularity has slumped to record lows over the scheme. Gillard will now try to convince voters opposed to the plan before the parliamentary vote, and try to deflect a campaign against it by the hardest-hit businesses. “It is absolutely critical that the government sells this very effectively,” said Tony Wood, director of the energy programme at the Grattan Institute policy thinktank. Australian retail and clean energy stocks were expected to be among the plan’s winners, and airlines and miners among the losers, but analysts said financial markets overall were likely to take the policy in their stride. The scheme aims to cut national emissions by 5% of 2000 levels by 2020, which would mean a cut of about 160m tonnes. The package already has the broad support of the Greens and independents, although crossbenchers said they had yet to support extra measures to protect jobs in the steel and coal industries. Parliament has rejected two previous attempts to tax carbon emissions in 2009 and any fresh rebuff in the next vote, expected around October, would seriously threaten Gillard’s government. A vigorous campaign by the conservative opposition and business groups could erode public support and frighten political backers before elections due by 2013. “This tax is going to go up and up and up as time goes by. I think this package is going to compound the trust problem that has dogged the prime minister. This package certainly sets up the next election to be a referendum on the carbon tax,” said the conservative opposition leader, Tony Abbott. Abbott has seized upon voter fears of a new tax and higher costs from a scheme that aims to transform how the nation generates and uses energy across the economy. To neutralise opposition, Gillard said more than A$24bn to be raised from pollution permit sales over the next three years would go to households through generous tax cuts worth more than A$15bn. Australia’s scheme will cover 60% of carbon pollution apart from exempted agricultural and light vehicle emissions, with treasury models showing it would boost the consumer price index by 0.7% in its first year. It could also aid global efforts to fight carbon pollution, which have largely stalled since the US president, Barack Obama, last year ruled out a federal climate bill in his present term. Outside the EU, only New Zealand has a national carbon scheme. “Other countries will look at one of the most carbon polluting economies on the planet that has made one huge stride forward towards putting a price on carbon,” said John Connor, chief executive of The Climate Institute. Australia said it hoped to link its scheme, which would cost A$4.4bn to implement after household and industry compensation, to other international carbon markets and land abatement schemes when its emissions market was running. Europe’s system, which covers the 27 EU member states plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, has forced power producers to pay for carbon emissions, driving cuts where power plants were forced to switch to cleaner natural gas or biomass. Australia Climate change Carbon emissions Pollution Emissions trading Mining Mining Coal Energy Fossil fuels guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Hit F5 to refresh or turn on the automatic widget below • Email your thoughts to alan.gardner.casual@guardian.co.uk • Check out Heikki Kovalainen’s interactive guide to Silverstone 12.59pm: Right, the entourages are scurrying off the track – we are about to go! go! go! 12.56pm: I’m intimately acquainted with the Silverstone track due to my experience playing TOCA Touring Cars on the PlayStation in the late 1990s – but, they’ve made some recent alterations, so Heikki Kovalainen’s interactive guide is a recommended read. 12.45pm: BBC shenanigans thus far: Water skiing with Button and Hamilton (Button twisted his knee and almost jeopardised his race); interviewing Prince Harry – who is about eight feet taller than Bernie Ecclestone; talking to Patrick Stewart, who claims if you were going to be run over by anyone “the world champion [Vettel] would be a good place to start”. Ah, the glitz and glamour. Anyway, according to Di Resta and Button, half the track is soaked and the other half isn’t – I wonder if anyone will go with two wet tyres and two dry? They’re about to play the national anthem, which is my cue to go refuel on the black stuff (nothing like a cup of petrol to open your eyes in the morning). The race starts in 15 minutes. Don’t go away! 12.38pm: Today’s pole sitter/No2 driver (and last year’s winner). 12.34pm: Weather report, with Twitter’s Giles Richards : Proper raining at copse now woohoo! #f1 #britishgp #motorsport #silverstone Good news for the McLarens, that. Like proper Brits, they’re only truly comfortable in wet, miserable conditions. 12.31pm: The final word on off-throttle blown diffusers, from Mark Webber: “It’s nonsense. Nobody really understands it. We don’t know what’s going on. It’s very boring for the fans. I am sure only 0.1 percent of the fans [and journalists] understand what’s going on.” I think that settles it, don’t you? Preamble: Morning all, welcome to lap-by-lap, brrrrm-by-brrrrm, crash-by-etcandsoon coverage of the British Grand Prix at Silverstone. Mark Webber is on pole, as part of a Red and Bullish front row that includes the reigning champion, current drivers’ standings leader and all-round F1 uber-driver, Sebastian Vettel. Chances of a British race winner look on the skinny decaf side, with Jenson Button’s McLaren parked fifth on the grid, five places ahead of his team-mate, Anger Management’s Lewis Hamilton. Rumours that Hamilton blew his top in the paddock this morning after being charged 85p for a can of coke are as yet unconfirmed. For today’s Plucky Brit In With An Outside Chance Of Podium Glory (aka. The Johnny Herbert Award), keep an eye out on Force India’s Paul di Resta, who starts in sixth. Now, shall we do this? British Grand Prix Formula One Motor sport Alan Gardner guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Crowd of up to 100 people attack police patrols with petrol bombs and missiles in Ballyclare Six police officers were injured overnight in rioting between Ulster loyalists and the security forces, in the run-up to the climax of marching season. The officers were hurt during disorder on the Doagh Road and Grange Estate areas of in Ballyclare, Co Antrim, where a crowd of up to 100 people attacked patrols with petrol bombs and missiles. At one point a hijacked bus was driven into a police vehicle. There were also reports of disorder in Carrickfergus, Newtownabbey and Magherafelt. In the early hours of Sunday police were called to the Leckagh Drive area of Magherafelt to trouble involving up to 50 people close to a loyalist bonfire. Police were attacked by missiles as they tried to remove a barricade. A 27-year-old man was arrested in connection with the trouble. A number of Catholic homes were also targeted in attacks described by police as sectarian. A number of roads in Carrickfergus remained blocked by burnt-out vehicles. The Democratic Unionist Assembly member for the area, David Hilditch, who is based in Carrickfergus, said the trouble involved “cars, works vans, the hijacking of a bus and damage to people’s personal property”. He said he was aware of at least five vehicles burned out in Carrickfergus. It is understod the violence was linked to a police attempt to limit the number of loyalist and pro-paramilitary flags being erected around the Ballyclare area. The violence has erupted at a time of concerns over the most controversial parade of the marching season, which passes by the nationalist Ardoyne area of north Belfast on 12 July – the most sacred day in the Orange Order’s calendar. A nationalist resident group in Ardoyne, which is not linked to Sinn Féin, has vowed to hold a counter-march on the same day. Last year 80 police officers were injured when nationalist youths attacked the security forces after the march. The Guardian has learned that both main loyalist paramilitary factions – the Ulster Defence Association and the Ulster Volunteer Force – do not plan to police their supporters involved in the parade that passes Ardoyne. In previous years UVF and UDA ex-prisoners flanked the march in an attempt to prevent younger loyalists from getting involved in violent clashes with Ardoyne republicans. One senior loyalist source said the two organisations were not prepared to put their members on the line this year because of a breakdown in communication between some local republicans and the loyalist community. Northern Ireland Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Argentinian singer’s concert promoter was apparently the target of well-planned operation, say officials One of Latin America’s most admired folk singers, Facundo Cabral, was killed in an ambush by gunmen in Guatemala on Saturday. The interior minister, Carlos Menocal, said the Argentinian singer and novelist was on his way to Guatemala’s main airport when three carloads of gunmen surrounded Cabral’s vehicle and opened fire. The minister said early investigations indicated the bullets were meant for the driver, Cabral’s Nicaraguan concert promoter Henry Farinas, who was wounded. Cabral, 74, rose to fame in the early 1970s, one of a generation of singers who mixed political protest with literary lyrics and created deep bonds with an audience struggling through an era of revolution and repression across Latin America. The Guatemalan president, Álvaro Colom, said he had called his Argentinian counterpart, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, to tell her of the killing. “It seemed to hit her hard and she asked me to keep her informed about how the investigation is developing,” he told Argentina’s Radio 10. Colom later laid the blame at “people involved in organised crime. They are not street killers. It’s a well-planned operation.” Officials said they were not sure of the motive. Cabral’s vehicle was trailed by another carrying four bodyguards, who opened fire and tried to chase the attackers, Menocal said. Officials later found one of the vehicles apparently used in the attack alongside a road towards El Salvador. Menocal said flak jackets, pistols and the magazine of a Kalashnikov assault rifle were found inside. Menocal said Cabral had initially planned to take a hotel shuttle to the airport, but accepted a ride from Farinas. Cabral became internationally known in 1970 through his song “No soy de aqui ni alla” – I’m Not From Here Nor There – which was recorded hundreds of times in many languages. By the time Argentina fell under military rule in 1976, Cabral was identified as a protest singer, and he fled to Mexico where he kept recording, writing books and giving concerts. His concerts were a mix of philosophy and folklore, spoken-word poems and music reflecting his roots in the gaucho culture of rural Argentina. On stage, he celebrated the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa, the humanism of Walt Whitman and the observations of Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges. “Facundo Cabral was our last troubadour. As much a philosopher-poet as a singer, he was a living testament to the search for what unites us in culture and society,” said the Argentinian singer Isabel de Sebastian. “After his concerts, you’d feel that our life in common was richer, more mysterious, more profound.” He lived mostly on the road, in hotels and with friends, telling interviewers that he owned no home. He was particularly proud that Unesco declared him to be an “international messenger of peace” in 1996. By the end, he often used a cane and had trouble with his vision, but refused to slow down. “I always ask God, ‘Why have you given me so much?’ You’ve given me misery, hunger, happiness, struggle, enlightenment … I’ve seen everything. I know there’s cancer, syphilis and springtime, and fried apple dumplings,” Cabral said at 71, during an Associated Press interview in Miami. He never thought of retiring: “I can’t stop, I wouldn’t be able to,” he said. “I breathe on the road … on stage I’m 50 years younger, it pleases me to excite people with life.” Cabral gave his last concert on Thursday in Quetzaltenango. Guatemala Argentina guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sand is trucked in to build up a coastline suffering erosion from storms, rising sea levels and development The high cost and exclusive nature of Italy’s best beaches cause regular disputes, but accelerating coastal erosion means some of them are now disappearing altogether. Italian actors, intellectuals and the titled rich setting off for the beach this summer have been shocked to find that one of their favourite spots has all but vanished, thanks to encroaching development and violent winter storms linked to climate change. Traditionally, the cultural and political elites have soaked up the summer sun at Capocotta beach near Rome, which has a reputation for bohemian flamboyance and boasts Italy’s only official nudist shoreline. But the golden dunes and beach huts have been swept away, leaving the literati fighting over a few inches of sand and how to rebuild. “I realised something was happening three years ago when a beach kiosk from further down the sands floated past us in a storm,” said Paolo Moscia, a lifeguard at the nudist section at Capocotta, which has drawn a mixture of gay bathers, ministers, musicians and hip film directors since Allen Ginsberg hung out there in the 1950s, and wild high-society drug parties gave birth to la dolce vita . This year regulars arrived to find that their section was reduced to a trickle of sand and storms had engulfed 30 metres of beach, leaving the wooden restaurant renowned for its oysters and grilled squid close to toppling off the dunes into the waves. Moscia pointed at swimmers beyond the breakers. “This time last year people were strolling on the sand out there,” he says. “If nothing is done, we won’t be here in two years.” Experts blame development along Italy’s rivers and the building of hydro-electric dams, which have slowed down the erosion of river banks and the flow out to sea of the tonnes of sediment and sand needed to replenish beaches after storms. “The Tiber sent 400,000 cubic metres of sand a year into the Mediterranean 25 years ago. Now it’s down to 80,000 cubic metres,” said Angelo Bonelli, head of the Italian Green party. Francesco Lalli, a senior researcher at Italy’s environmental research centre, Ispra, said Italy’s beaches lost five million cubic metres of sand between 1950 and 2000. The losses caused by overbuilding are levelling out, he said, adding that there is now a suspicion that the storms chewing away at the beaches are more violent because of climate change. “Plus, we are seeing the initial effects of rising sea levels,” he warned. North of Rome, L’Ultima Spiaggia beach has fared no better than Capocotta. A long-time favourite of Italy’s leftwing cultural elite, including the former prime minister Romano Prodi, the beach is tucked into the lower reaches of Tuscany. It is a retreat for philosophers, aristocrats and anti-Berlusconi politicians who convene every summer to eat wild boar and attend cultural conferences in nearby Capalbio, a medieval hilltown nicknamed “Little Athens”. After storms left just a shallow layer of sand this spring, 15 metres have now been restored, thanks only to four truckloads of sand dumped by the local authority. But, according to the environmental centre Ispra, more than 1,000km of coastline is now eroding steadily. Since the economic boom of the 1950s, working-class bathers from nearby Rome have flocked to the beach clubs of Ostia, near Rome. But they, too, are now watching their beaches slip away, prompting the regional authority to pump in sand scooped up from the seabed, part of a ¤26m scheme to bring 350,000 cubic metres of sand ashore to fill the gaps on almost 400km of coastline. For patrons of the Sporting Beach Club in Ostia, where forlorn lines of changing rooms that once stood 150 metres back from the sea are now buffeted by waves, the new sand cannot arrive soon enough. “My parents came here before me and I am sticking it out,” said Ivana Paolini, 55, “but it’s tough when you have to swim out to sea past concrete pillars holding up the changing rooms.” An expert at the environmental group Legambiente said beach clubs were partly to blame for losing the sand on which they charge sunbathers for the privilege of stretching out. “The dunes which advanced to replace lost sand are being concreted over by the clubs,” said Giorgio Zampetti. “By building beach clubs to profit from the sand, people are ensuring that sand will vanish.” Italy Europe Climate change Sea level Oceans Beach holidays Tom Kington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with the Professional Left , otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal . Links for this podcast include: Dunning Kruger Effect Chris Hayes Weighs in on Our Media’s Failures With Their Coverage of the Casey Anthony Trial Santorum accuses Obama of creating ‘only 240 million jobs’ Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everyone.
Continue reading …A Russian-born poet on US passport, Alex Galper, is held in cell and deported for planning to speak at arts festival A growing number of foreign artists, ranging from grassroots fringe performers to world-renowned stars, are ruling this country out of their future travel plans due to difficulties with obtaining visas. They are following in the footsteps of the admired Iranian film director Abbas Kiarostami, who abandoned plans to come to Britain to direct an opera after the UK embassy in Tehran asked him to submit his application documents twice. Since its introduction in 2008, a revised system for short-term visitors has seen many artists, photographers and musicians threatened with deportation . Border officials routinely take fingerprints and ask for assurances that visitors do not plan to use their cameras, paintbrushes or instruments , in case they are coming for paid work. The latest high-profile artist to rue his decision to travel to Britain is the Russian writer Alex Galper. A fortnight ago the acclaimed poet, who studied under Allen Ginsberg in New York, came to Britain on his American passport to give a poetry recital. But he was refused entry at Luton airport and is threatened with a 10-year ban. “I said to them, ‘I don’t have to tell you what I am doing. I am an American citizen.’ But they put me in the deportation room,” said Galper this weekend from New York. His case has fuelled efforts by the anti-censorship pressure group English PEN – together with the London Mayor’s office – to call on the government to scrap the approach currently adopted by the UK Border Agency. Jonathan Heawood, director of English PEN, said: “The UK Border Agency seem to have lost their passport to common sense. They told us that their heavy-handed treatment of visiting artists was a thing of the past, but that message has clearly not filtered through to the airport officials who treated Alex Galper so appallingly. A visa for unpaid artists already exists and should have been offered to Alex. Instead, he was treated like a criminal and deported without his personal belongings, and the charity event he had hoped to attend was ruined.” English PEN argues that foreign artists do not take work from British and European residents since they are invited here for their specific abilities. The organisation would like to see the so-called Entertainer Visitor Route redefined as Artist Visitors to provide more clarity. At the moment, only artists who come into Britain to take part in a “permit-free” event, such as the annual Edinburgh International Festival, are allowed to accept a fee. PEN claims this creates unnecessary confusion. “The current points-based visa system places a huge financial and bureaucratic responsibility on artists,” added Heawood. “To invite just one artist to the UK as a ‘licensed sponsor’ costs over £500. This might be affordable to large institutions, but is far too expensive for small groups. The UKBA don’t understand writers and artists, and they don’t understand the value of art and literature to the UK economy and society.” Galper did not need to apply in advance for a normal tourist visa. Although Russian by birth, he has a job in New York, and writes and promotes his poetry part-time. He first flew to Britain a month ago to stay with a friend and then accepted an invitation to attend a poetry event in Germany, taking an overnight trip to Berlin. Galper also received an invitation from a London-based theatre company, the Gruntlers Arts Group, to appear for no fee at a fundraising gala night. However, when Galper flew back to Luton from Germany, he was questioned by border officials who were suspicious that he could not show them an onward ticket for travel. Galper had, he said, made a booking for a return flight over the internet, but had no paper documentation. The Border Agency officials called Galper’s friend in London, who mentioned that he was due at the charity poetry event that evening. As a result, it was ruled that Galper had been deliberately deceptive and had intended to work in Britain. After making a phone call to the event organiser, David Parry, Galper was held in a cell overnight before being deported back to Germany the next day. “I knew all these people had been waiting for me in London,” said Galper. “Appearing there and meeting people would have been the highlight of my life. Instead I had to leave all my clothes at my friend’s house and travel without them for a month.” Back in London, the fundraising event was a flop and the journalists who came to interview Galper were sent home. “I am still hopping mad with anger about it,” said Parry. “I wanted to get some Beat poets together and there was a lot of interest. Then I got a call from Alex at the airport and he could not understand what was happening to him.” A Border Agency spokesperson said: “Creative artists from across the world are welcome to perform in the UK. However, as with any visitors, we expect individuals to meet entry requirements.” Immigration and asylum Arts policy Poetry guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A medieval statue stolen from a London church in 1941 was spotted at an auction house A treasured 17th-century statue that was looted from one of London’s last-surviving medieval churches during the Blitz has been returned to its rightful owners more than 70 years after it disappeared. The work, a sculpted and painted likeness of Dr Peter Turner, an eminent 17th-century botanist and physician at London’s St Bartholomew’s hospital, was stolen from St Olave’s church near the Tower of London on the night of 17 April 1941, when bombing severely damaged the church. Last month, the 1614 statue was finally brought back home to the church, restored in the 1950s, ending a 14-month legal dispute, which exposed the art trade’s failure to question the origin of works being sold on. In 2009, churchwardens received a tip-off from the Museum of London that the statue was about to be sold by Dreweatts, a British auctioneer, on behalf of an anonymous seller for an estimated £70,000. The church lodged a claim, and Dreweatts withdrew the statue from auction, retaining it until the case was resolved. The seller rejected calls to hand it back, insisting he had acquired it in good faith. The Art Loss Register, which liaises with the police and the art trade to help track down stolen artworks, waived its fees to take up the church’s cause. Detective work by the register’s lawyer, Christopher A. Marinello, revealed a chain of previous buyers included Paul de Grande, a Belgian ecclesiastical dealer, who had bought the statue from a trader in Holland who, in turn, had named a British dealer, Gray Dench from West Malling, as the original seller. Marinello’s research showed that the name was false and the trail led him to Gray Elcombe, who operated as an antique dealer and had been imprisoned for serious crimes. Marinello said: “I do not believe that de Grande or the Dutch dealer knew that this bust was stolen. The legal issues involved are very complex and will likely be discussed in art law publications in the future. However, both dealers knew that the bust originated from St. Olave’s. One simple phone call to St. Olave’s would have brought the true history to light.” The Dutch dealer declined to comment, but de Grande told The Observer that he did not ring St Olave’s because wartime photographs of its bombed state led him to believe it had been destroyed. In fact, St Olave’s stonework was largely reconstructed in the early 1950s. He detailed its connection to St Olave’s to the auction-house – information which, he said, ultimately led to its return. The statue, which had stood in St Olave’s for centuries, surviving the Great Fire of 1666 and watching over the resting place of diarist Samuel Pepys, will undergo conservation work before being reinstalled in the church. London Second world war Dalya Alberge guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …