Graeme Swann is the rebel of English cricket whose career resurgence has mirrored England’s. He talks about his wild early years, being banished from the national team – and the passing of the game’s drink culture To mark the cricket establishment’s embrace of the ultimate rebel, Graeme Swann is being photographed by the statue of WG Grace outside Lord’s. “Can I stroke his beard?” asks Swann, cuddling the cricketing legend. “You don’t want me riding him like a donkey or anything? He’s got lovely definition in his arms, I’ll give him that,” he says, stroking WG’s bronze forearms. Swann’s irreverence is not quite what cricket’s stuffy authorities might expect of the best one-day bowler in the world, who has just captained England’s Twenty20 team at the end of a triumphant season. But the 32-year-old off-spinner has reached the top on his own terms after he was banished from the England squad for seven years. His twisting ascent mirrors England’s own renaissance. Swann received his first international call-up 12 years ago when England sank to the bottom of the world ratings; his return has followed a period of unaccustomed success. England have become the best international cricket team in the world. “I don’t want to say it’s due to me being back in the team, I honestly don’t, but stats don’t lie,” he says, laughing. “I never believed in stats, I never bought into them until I got to No1 in the world. They definitely do count now.” A sprinkler is ticking away on the lush oval at Lord’s as Swann, feted for his part in England’s thrashing of Australia last winter , settles down in a hospitality box to talk about his autobiography. For decades, off-spinners have been cautious bowlers, deployed by their captains to restrict the batting team’s run-rate rather than take bucketloads of wickets. Swann has become an unusually attacking bowler, taking wickets by spinning the ball hard. His lack of caution on the field is matched by a devil-may-care attitude off it. His cavalier disregard for authority is adored by both fans and the media. If England have a bad day, their spin doctors invariably send out Swanny, the tweeting, guitar-playing, natural-born entertainer, to pacify the press. So expectations over Swann’s autobiography are unusually high. From the very beginning, when he apologises for the awful punning title (The Breaks Are Off) and generously introduces his ghostwriter, Swann does his best to live down the deserved reputation most sporting autobiographies have for self-serving drabness. His tale is full of honesty, bonhomie – and boozing. Anyone playing a drinking game by matching Swanny’s sessions as they read would soon pass out. When he won his first professional contract with Northamptonshire, Swann spent most of his time, and money, on the pull in a fake Ralph Lauren shirt (“you could always tell because the man on a horse looked more like a monkey on an armadillo,” he writes). “It was undoubtedly a drinking culture in the old days,” says Swann fondly. “I remember playing a match at Hampshire. They were known as Happy Hampshire, because their motto was ‘Win or lose, we booze’. It was obviously tongue-in-cheek but there was a bar next to the car park. [Former Hampshire players] Robin Smith and Chris Smith and Adi Aymes would be there, and you’d end up having six, seven pints just chatting about cricket. It wasn’t getting lashed and going out for a kebab, it was just talking about the game, staggering back to the hotel, coming back in the morning, playing and doing it all over again.” Over the course of his career Swann has watched cricket become far more professional: central contracts for England players and demands for higher levels of fitness are “almost trying to take some of the jollity out of the game”. Swann says the fitness coaches have won – the fun has disappeared. “There used to be real camaraderie, drinking with the opposition, on the pull with the opposition,” he says. This year, he played for his current county, Nottinghamshire, against Sussex. Their second team also stayed at their Brighton hotel. Swann was bemused to see the youngsters meekly drifting around the city in their tracksuits. “As an 18-year-old off the leash in Brighton, I’d have had my best trapping gear on. I’d have been in Walkabout from midday onwards trying to sleep with any bird I could get my hands on. And these guys, completely unaware of how stupid they all looked in Notts cricket club tracksuits, walking around the middle of Brighton!” Many fans, of course, would argue it is no coincidence that the upsurge in England’s – and Swann’s – fortunes has come about by calling time on cricket’s drinking culture. “Thank God Jagerbombs had not been invented pre-2000 because they would have ended a few careers,” writes Swann. He cut back as he got older because the hangovers got so much worse. Married with a young son, Wilf, Swann may have cut out regular boozing but it is unlikely that footballers would get away with knocking back so much – or admitting it. In the build-up to England’s crucial first Test against Australia last year Swann and his fellow bowlers got on the Jagerbombs in Brisbane. “After falling over several times I left the youngsters to it,” he writes. And he still hits the town when England win. “Even though every health pundit will say it’s a terrible thing, I’d rather wait till we win and then binge-drink,” he says breezily. “I’d rather get drunk with my mates, celebrate a good victory and sleep off the horrendous hangover the next day. That’s a much better way of doing it.” Family tensions Swann grew up in a family of cricket obsessives. His older brother, Alec , followed in the footsteps of their geordie dad, a brilliant batsman. Swann was forced to bowl because he was the youngest. “You do whatever you’re told, you’re the skivvy, aren’t you?” he says. Competing with Alec, Swann swiftly became far better than boys his own age and the brothers were soon representing Northamptonshire and young England, playing alongside and against Andrew Flintoff and Phil Neville, the Everton footballer. Great things were expected of the Swann brothers. Swann’s dad, a maths teacher, is a forbidding and pessimistic authority figure in the book. Swann says he always thought his dad was “superman” but clashed with him over cricket. While Alec dutifully followed their father’s example and meticulously compiled slow hundreds, Swann loved thrashing the ball around. “I remember Dad saying to me once: ‘No one will ever remember a flashy 30.’ I thought: ‘Bollocks they will.’ I almost went out to prove him wrong. I wish he’d said, ‘No one will remember a boring 200,’” says Swann. “It’s very strange how I always grew up idolising my dad but not listening to a bloody word he said.” There is a Cain and Abel moment in Swann’s story when, playing for Northamptonshire, he caught out his brother, who had moved to Lancashire. Swann’s family were distraught. “I remember Grandma being devastated when I caught my brother out. She phoned up and said: ‘What did you bloody do that for?’” Earlier in the season, he had also bowled Alec out. “I looked over at my mum and dad and my dad had his head buried in his hands. He didn’t talk to me for a couple of days. He couldn’t understand it.” Did that reaction hurt Swann? “No, it didn’t. I just thought, well, he’ll come round, it’s me dad,” he says. That catch, however, had far-reaching consequences. It proved to be Alec’s last professional innings as, aged just 27, his Lancashire contract was not renewed. Alec is now cricket correspondent for the Northants Evening Telegraph. Swann is “perplexed” that his brother’s career finished prematurely because he’s “a much better batter” than “half the guys still playing county cricket”. Swann, however, flourished without the attentions – or obvious approval – of his dad. “My brother is very similar to my dad in many ways. Because he’s an opening bat and my dad’s an opening bat, maybe my dad just lived his career through my brother a little bit. I was a spinner who was a bit of a free spirit and went off and did what I wanted,” he says. “By forever disagreeing with any theory he had, maybe subconsciously I was trying to give myself a less-pressured environment. Maybe it was just my way of dealing with the pressure because there was that expectation on me and my brother.” Youthful underachievement Swann looked destined to become a flamboyant underachiever after his disastrous first England tour. His mischievous sense of fun, and anti-authoritarian streak, led to rifts with former England coach Duncan Fletcher and Rod Marsh, the Australian cricket legend and another influential coach. (Adopting an Australian accent and calling Marsh an “ignorant cunt” for being oblivious to Robbie Williams was not the wisest joke.) Aged 20, Swann was taken on England’s tour of South Africa in 1999/2000 and was shocked by the “very selfish, cliquey” dressing room. His fellow spinner Phil Tufnell was one of several “very fragile characters” who lacked confidence in their ability, writes Swann. Bowlers Andy Caddick and Darren Gough apparently hated each other and the latter “sucker punched” Swann when he stood at the urinals; Swann claims in the book to have done nothing to provoke him. Swann hardly played and had a dismal tour. The only thing he learned was the power of getting the crowd on his side after he was struck by a boerewors , a South African sausage, hurled from a hostile crowd. He took a bite, threw it back and was then cheered every time he touched the ball. But he was not picked again for England for seven years. Fletcher told him he admired his attitude but Swann subsequently learned that Fletcher had privately given him a “dreadful” tour report. Swann says he bears no grudge and is forthright about his own shortcomings: “I was an idiot basically.” He had been given £30,000 to tour. “I couldn’t wait to spend it on as much Jack Daniels as I could throw down my throat. There wasn’t an ounce of maturity in me then.” Swann recently captained England’s exceedingly youthful Twenty20 team. He hopes the dressing room is more welcoming these days. He believes it is easier for this young generation because, unlike when he was England’s lone youngster, a bunch have been picked at the same time. “Without sounding a bit wet and trendy-lefty, when they go back to the hotel they can discuss their day, and actually share the experience and grow from it. That does sound hippyish. All I did, I went back to my own room and thought, ‘What time do the air hostesses get down to the bar?’ I had no one to talk to.” England’s one-day series in India starts tomorrow, October 14. Swann is full of praise today for captain Andrew Strauss (“probably the most natural born leader I’ve played under”), coach Andy Flower (“a brilliant coach”) and teammates such as his good friend Jimmy Anderson. But he attributes England’s success not to greater professionalism or adopting Australian-style mental resilience, but simply to “this big circle” whereby good generations rise and fall. In the early 1980s it was the West Indies, then Australia had the best players in the world, the likes of Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath and Ricky Ponting. “They all finished at the same time so as Australia were looking for new guys to fill their shoes, England snuck up behind them, and all of a sudden we had two or three of the best players in the world,” he says. “I feel privileged and lucky to be in the team I am. The trick is to try to dominate world cricket for a decade like Australia did and that’s going to be hard.” Swann wants to keep playing cricket for as long as he can – and is desperate to trade some of his flashy 30s for an England century. With his good humour and huge Twitter following, a career as a cricket pundit surely beckons. Surprisingly, Swann worries it would not suit him. “I’d be a maverick commentator. I’d not turn up for three days and be pictured on a yacht with Jenson Button in Monaco when I should be in Napier for a Test match. I don’t know what the future holds but if I had the choice it would be a primetime Saturday show with Jimmy Anderson as my straight sidekick. But he needs to work on his delivery. He’s been appalling recently.” Graeme Swann Cricket Patrick Barkham guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Tehran denies it was behind plot to kill Saudi ambassador and says US is using it to divert attention from problems at home Saudi Arabia has issued a menacing warning to Iran that it will have to pay a price for the alleged plot to hire a Mexican drug cartel to assassinate its ambassador in Washington. The threat from the Saudis came as the Obama administration described the alleged plot as a “dangerous escalation” in the region. White House spokesman Jay Carney said “clearly the plotting happened at senior levels of the Quds force [Iranian special forces]” but the administration resisted calls from within the US, mainly from the conservative right, to retaliate against Iran with military action. On Wednesday night Carney said Barack Obama spoke to King Abdullah, the Saudi king, about the alleged plot and both agreed it was “a flagrant violation of international law”. Iran denied it was behind the alleged plot, with officials accusing Washington of fabricating the story to divide Sunni Muslims, the dominant group in Saudi, and Shia Muslims, the dominant group in Iran. They claimed Barack Obama was using the story to divert attention from the Occupy Wall Street protests. The US justice department said on Tuesday two men had been charged with a plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington, Adel al-Jubeir, with a bomb explosion at one of his favourite restaurants. One of the men, Manssor Arbabsiar, an American-Iranian, is alleged to have sought the help of a Mexican drug cartel, Zetas, to provide explosives and carry out the attack. The other man is, according to the US, in Iran. Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador to Washington and former head of the Saudi intelligence service, told a London conference: “The burden of proof and the amount of evidence in the case is overwhelming and clearly shows official Iranian responsibility for this. “This is unacceptable. Somebody in Iran will have to pay the price.” Relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran have long been strained, exacerbated this year by Saudi sending forces into neighbouring Bahrain to help put down protesters, many of them Shia Muslims. In spite of increased tension between Saudi and Iran as a result of the episode, the alleged plot is being met with scepticism within the diplomatic community, as well as from foreign affairs analysts specialising in Iran. Many said the plot was amateurish and questioned what Iran would gain from such an outrage. A former western diplomat with an intimate knowledge of Iranian affairs said: “I don’t believe Iran’s regime was behind the plot. If we assume it was Iran’s plot, then it would seem like a group of professional gangsters hiring a careless agent for their most important project. It’s impossible.” Fresh details emerged yesterday about the man at the centre of the affair. Arbabsiar, 56, appeared in court in New York on Tuesday. He is allegedly linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the paramilitary group closely entwined with the Iranian leadership. He does not fit the usual profile of an Iranian agent, who tend to be professional. Arbabsiar is a car salesman in Corpus Christi, Texas. Susan Rice, US ambassador to the UN, said she and a team of experts were briefing individual members of the security council on the plot. One of the main pieces of evidence is $100,000 (£63,000) transferred to the US, allegedly from Iran, as a downpayment for the assassination attempt. The vice-president, Joe Biden, in an ABC television interview, said Iran would be held accountable and all options, including military, remained on the table. But the administration is focused on a diplomatic effort to persuade its allies to impose tougher economic sanctions on Iran. The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, described the alleged plot as a “reckless act”. The state department issued a three-month worldwide travel alert for American citizens. Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman, Ramin Mehmanparast, said the US accusations were baseless. “Such worn-out approaches are … part of the special scenarios staged and pursued by the enemies of Islam and the region to sow discord among Muslims,” the semi-official Fars news agency quoted him as saying. Fars also quoted Alaoddin Boroujerdi, the head of the parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, saying: “Today the United States is witnessing a popular uprising called Wall Street protests, which have targeted the hostile policies of that country’s statesmen. Thus, Americans are seeking to derail the public opinion from the Wall Street uprising.” Iran Global terrorism FBI United States Saudi Arabia US foreign policy Hillary Clinton Obama administration Ewen MacAskill Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Payouts would be put on hold for undercapitalised institutions • EC president softens up bondholders up for losses of 30% Europe’s biggest banks would be barred from paying out dividends and bonuses if they are forced to raise their capital reserves to withstand future shocks, under plans put forward by the European commission to resolve the debt crisis. At the same time, banks are being softened up by Brussels to accept “haircuts”, or losses, of 30%-50% on their holdings of Greek debt rather than the current 21%. Senior commission officials are also examining ways to boost the size of the main bailout fund, the European financial stability facility (EFSF), closer to the €2
Continue reading …Notices served against BP, Transocean and Halliburton by US government over Deepwater Horizon disaster BP and its partners on the doomed Deepwater Horizon oil rig face fines of up to $45m after receiving formal notice of a series of safety violations leading up to the Gulf of Mexico disaster. In a first step of a long legal battle, the interior department said BP, rig operator Transocean and contractor Halliburton between them broke 15 rules governing offshore drilling ahead of the 20 April 2010 explosion. Eleven workers were killed and 4.9m barrels of oil were pumped into the Gulf of Mexico before the well was capped. Wednesday’s notices mark the first time the US government has gone after contractors – in this case Transocean and Halliburton – in addition to oil companies. The tactic could influence lawsuits between BP and its partners over their responsiblility. BP still faces separate penalties of up to $21bn for environmental violations. The notices have come a day before executives from all three companies are due to testify before Congress on the findings from the latest investigation. A coast guard finding last month said cost-cutting by BP and its partners were “contributing causes” of the fatal blowout. Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, said in a statement that the notices of non-compliance were a first step in addressing the violations detailed in that investigation. “Companies that violate federal regulations must be held accountable,” he said. “The joint investigation clearly revealed the violation of numerous federal regulations designed to protect the integrity of offshore operations.” BP received seven of the notices, including failure to maintain control over the well, failure to prevent pollutants from leaking into the Gulf and health and safety violations. Transocean was cited four times, for failing to control the well and the blowout preventer, the last line of defence against a disaster. Halliburton was cited four times, for failure to cement the well properly and for health and safety violations. The relevant fines are capped at $35,000 a day per incident – an amount that Bromwich has in the past described as too low to be an effective deterrent. It would cap the fines on BP and the other companies at about $45m if they were held to be in violation for the duration of the 87-day spill. BP faces far stiffer penalties under the US Clean Water Act, which is assessed on the amount of oil spilled and could cost the companies up to $21bn. The companies have 60 days to appeal against the sanctions. Transocean said it would appeal. All three companies are pursuing lawsuits against one another and BP said in a statement that the notices showed its partners were partly to blame. “We continue to encourage other parties, including Transocean and Halliburton, to acknowledge their responsibilities in the accident.” BP Oil spills BP oil spill United States Suzanne Goldenberg guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Another critically injured after gunman opens fire in Salon Meritage in coastal town of Seal Beach Eight people have been killed and another critically injured in a shooting at a California hair salon. The shooting happened at 1.21pm local time at the Salon Meritage on Pacific Coast Highway in the coastal town of Seal Beach, an Orange County fire official said. Six victims died at the scene and another two of the three critically injured victims died later in Long Beach Memorial hospital, said Seal Beach police sergeant Steve Bowles . Police officers arrested the suspected gunman half a mile from the scene after fleeing in a car and he was taken into custody. “We feel very confident at this point that we do have the single and only suspect in custody,” Bowles said. “He appeared cooperative and did not resist our officers at all when he was detained.” The officer also told local KCAL-TV that multiple weapons were seized. Bowles said detectives were trying to establish a motive for the violence but believed there was some kind of relationship between the gunman and someone inside the salon, which was filled with customers at the time. He did not know how many of the victims were employees or how many were clients. All eight of the dead were believed to have been shot inside the salon, and one man who was wounded was found outside, but it was not clear where he was struck, the officer said. “There are survivors from inside the salon that escaped without harm,” he added. The coastal town of about 25,000 inhabitants is about 30 miles south-east of Los Angeles. California Gun crime United States guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Report says kill-or-capture raids are not a surgical tactic as claimed and use of the word ‘leader’ is suspect The success of one of Nato’s principal tactics against the Taliban – targeted night raids aimed at killing or capturing leaders of the insurgency – may have been exaggerated to make the military campaign in Afghanistan look more effective, according to a report published on Wednesday. The study shows that for every “leader” killed in the raids, eight other people also died, although the raids were designed to be a precise weapon aimed at decapitating the Taliban on the battlefield by removing their commanders. The report notes that in briefings to the US media, aggregate claims made for the number of Taliban leaders killed or detained over a given period were sometimes much greater than the numbers recorded in the daily press releases. The report, by Kandahar-based researchers Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn, for the Afghanistan Analysts Network, looked at the daily press releases published by the Nato-led International Stability Assistance Force (Isaf) to create a profile of the “kill-or-capture raids” from December 2009 to the end of September this year. Strick van Linschoten also said Isaf’s definition of the word leader was “so broad as to be meaningless”. He said the words leader and “facilitator” were sometimes used interchangeably in the Isaf press releases, although facilitator could just be someone whose house an insurgent group was thought to have used. A previous study of night raids had found that many people classified as leaders captured in night raids had subsequently been released by Isaf. “The use of the word ‘leader’ is intended to convey the impression that the masterminds of the Taliban are being taking off the battlefield. That’s a misrepresentation,” Strick van Linschoten said. “It is meant to be taken as meaning that we are taking out the brains behind the Taliban off the battlefield, but that claim doesn’t really measure up.” The report, entitled A Knock on the Door, echoes a study published last month by the Open Society Foundations. That study said that although Isaf had made strides in reducing the number of civilian casualties, the 12 to 20 raids a night over a sustained period, with thousands of arrests, many of them of non-combatants, were alienating the population and undermining the international coalition’s aims in Afghanistan. “The raids are a far blunter weapon than we have been led to believe, and they have an indiscriminate impact,” said Erica Gaston, a human rights lawyer for the Open Society Foundations and co-author of the
Continue reading …Northern Ireland police report no injuries as City of Culture offices are targeted for the second time A bomb detonated outside the City of Culture office in Derry on Wednesday night, police said. There were no reports of injuries and police have yet to reveal details on the extent of the damage caused. It is the second time that the office has been targeted after a pipe bomb planted by dissident republicans in January caused minor damage to the building. Derry’s successful bid for title of UK City of Culture has secured cross-community support in Northern Ireland. The city’s Shipquay Street was closed off on Wednesday night by officers investigating the blast, which they reported at around 11pm. SDLP Foyle MP Mark Durkan condemned those responsible for the explosion, saying they ‘have shown complete and utter contempt for the people of Derry’. “Derry is a city with many challenges and with many difficulties. But the City of Culture is one of the opportunities we have,” Durkan said. “It has been strongly supported across our city, not just for the positive ongoing work to make it a memorable and successful year for Derry, but for the legacy that it will create long after 2013 as a springboard for future investment here.” He added: “This callous and dangerous act flies in the face of the efforts made by so many people to improve life here. Thankfully no one has been injured but those graces are no thanks to those who are behind this attack. “They are out to destroy and they don’t care if they injure or kill when they are at it.” Northern Ireland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Northern Ireland police report no injuries as City of Culture offices are targeted for the second time A bomb detonated outside the City of Culture office in Derry on Wednesday night, police said. There were no reports of injuries and police have yet to reveal details on the extent of the damage caused. It is the second time that the office has been targeted after a pipe bomb planted by dissident republicans in January caused minor damage to the building. Derry’s successful bid for title of UK City of Culture has secured cross-community support in Northern Ireland. The city’s Shipquay Street was closed off on Wednesday night by officers investigating the blast, which they reported at around 11pm. SDLP Foyle MP Mark Durkan condemned those responsible for the explosion, saying they ‘have shown complete and utter contempt for the people of Derry’. “Derry is a city with many challenges and with many difficulties. But the City of Culture is one of the opportunities we have,” Durkan said. “It has been strongly supported across our city, not just for the positive ongoing work to make it a memorable and successful year for Derry, but for the legacy that it will create long after 2013 as a springboard for future investment here.” He added: “This callous and dangerous act flies in the face of the efforts made by so many people to improve life here. Thankfully no one has been injured but those graces are no thanks to those who are behind this attack. “They are out to destroy and they don’t care if they injure or kill when they are at it.” Northern Ireland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The popular protests that began last month in lower Manhattan before spreading across the country have generally been characterized, at least in the media’s short-hand, as “anti-Wall Street” — driven by anger about the financial industry recklessness and greed that helped tank the economy. Given the “Occupy Wall Street” name, and the site of the
Continue reading …The popular protests that began last month in lower Manhattan before spreading across the country have generally been characterized, at least in the media’s short-hand, as “anti-Wall Street” — driven by anger about the financial industry recklessness and greed that helped tank the economy. Given the “Occupy Wall Street” name, and the site of the
Continue reading …