Click here to view this media A simple mistake. Just copy and paste an old template and you too can pretend you’re a U.S. Senator. Joan McCarter at Daily Kos nails it: Why reinvent the wheel when you can come across as so much more genuine and sincere and committed to public service by using someone else’s words. Particularly when you’re trying to recruit students to come be interns for you. via Boston.com : WASHINGTON – A Democratic group has unearthed a bit of inspirational autobiography on Senator Scott Brown’s official website that was lifted verbatim from Elizabeth Dole ’s site, language that originated in a campaign speech. In a message to students, the Massachusetts senator uses the exact words as remarks delivered by the former North Carolina senator at her campaign kickoff in 2002. Brown’s staff acknowledged yesterday the words originally were Dole’s and said their presence in Brown’s message was the result of a technical error . “ I was raised to believe that there are no limits to individual achievement and no excuses to justify indifference,” said the message from Brown, which was removed later yesterday. “From an early age, I was taught that success is measured not in material accumulations, but in service to others. I was encouraged to join causes larger than myself, to pursue positive change through a sense of mission, and to stand up for what I believe.” Aside from the omission of an opening line — “I am Mary and John Hanford’s daughter” — in Dole’s speech, the Bay State Republican’s language is the same throughout.
Continue reading …I’ve been doing a little bit of work with the Occupy Tallahassee group and have been covering Occupy Wall Street for Crooks and Liars and I thought I’d share a few suggestions based on what I’ve observed. These protests present an historic moment for people who think the system is broken and who want to really make a change. The protests have brought in thousands of new people across the country who don’t like the way things are going and want to do something about it. But the other side has more money and more power and has faced opposition before. In order to avoid losing to them once again, there are some things that local groups need to pay attention to… 1. It’s all about attracting more and more people. The way we make change is by gathering together so many people that they can’t ignore us. 2. Get information about everyone who shows up. We have to be able to contact people for future events and actions. 3. Give people something to do. Protests and rallies are nice. They get people fired up and they can get some media attention. But they aren’t enough. We have to take those people who show up to the rallies and give them something concrete to do that will make a difference. 4. We all, every one of us, have to know what we’re talking about. The number one way to lose momentum is for us to allow the media to marginalize us as kooks or crazies. If we are all educated and we only give the media educated, thoughtful responses, then we take away the opposition’s major weapon. 5. We have to have a coherent message. The media and the opposition are already trying to paint us as having no real point. If they succeed in convincing the public that is true, the movement will die off. People will go home and nothing will change. 6. We have to walk a thin line when it comes to the law. Civil disobedience is a valid tool and it changes the world. But not if it is violent or disrespectful of the very people the 1 percent are already screwing over. We have to be better than the other side, not fall into their tactics or fall for the traps they are setting for us. And keep in mind that law enforcement and other people who may appear to be our opposition at times are getting screwed over by the 1 percent, too. We should be recruiting them, not antagonizing them. 7. At the end of the day, when the protest is over, we have to realize that just showing up and protesting and occupying isn’t enough. It is an amazing start, but protests are never successful if they aren’t coupled with actions that can change the world. Lawsuits and elections are the key tools in American history (and beyond) that have changed the way the system worked and created progress. We have to use the mass mobilizations as a way to get politicians elected that will fight the 1 percent (like Alan Grayson and Bernie Sanders, for instance) and we have to fund lawsuits that will enforce laws that already exist that protect our rights. Without these tools we can’t win. 8. We have to win the media battle. This isn’t going to be easy, because the 1 percent owns the media. But they don’t own the Internet. Well they do, but they can’t stop us from using it. And we have to use it well enough to force the rest of the media to pay attention and do the right thing. When a reporter lies about how many people were at an event, we need to use the web to tell the truth. When a reporter tries to spin a story to undercut what we’re doing, we need to use the web to tell the truth. They won’t do it unless we force them to. This is cross-posted from my blog, Florida Progressive Coalition
Continue reading …The broadcast networks continued their enthusiastic coverage Friday night on behalf of the far-left Wall Street protesters, with NBC’s Brian Williams, again, the most excited while CBS anchor Scott Pelley, who has until now refrained from the hype delivered by ABC and NBC, jumped in by promising “a series of reports on the growing protests around the country.” Williams led by touting how the protesters “are claiming victory tonight” by not getting removed from the Manhattan park. He then hailed their impact which he has helped fuel: “This protest movement is showing strength. It’s still growing, changing and spreading…” Pelley set up the first of his three CBS Evening News reports: “Those protests against Wall Street are continuing into the weekend all over the country in 103 cities and in 36 states. We have correspondents tonight at three of those protests.” Following a story from Manhattan, Pelley and reporter Bill Whitaker trumpeted the economic diversity of the protesters. “The protesters claim that they represent 99 percent of Americans against the wealthiest one percent,” Pelley announced. “In Los Angeles, Bill Whitaker is finding protesters from nearly every walk of life.” Next, Pelley asserted “Elaine Quijano is talking to those protesters who are acting in Boston and she’s found some people who you would never expect to be unemployed.” In fact, she found just what you’d expect: recent college graduates. About Thursday night: “‘ Message’ of Wall Street Protests ‘Increasingly Resonating,’ NBC’s Williams Champions .” > > MRC Media Reality Check posted Thursday. “ A Tale of Two Protests: Media Cheer Wall Street Occupiers But Jeered Tea Partiers ; Study: ABC, CBS and NBC loaded their broadcasts with 33 full stories in just 11 days of coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests.”
Continue reading …Stephen Twigg’s statement in favour of test-based support to government’s schools policy contradicts Ed Miliband’s criticism Labour’s new education spokesman has said he backs the setting up of “free schools”, signalling a significant shift in policy from his predecessor. In an interview with the Liverpool Daily Post , Stephen Twigg said Labour will embrace the government’s “schools revolution” providing certain tests are met. The first 24 free schools opened last month. They are intended to tackle divides in England’s education system, including a concentration of the weakest schools in the poorest areas. But analysis commissioned by the Guardian has found that the first 24 are tilted towards areas dominated by middle-class households. Labour leader Ed Miliband told the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme three weeks ago that he was opposed to free schools. Twigg’s predecessor, Andy Burnham, had described free schools as a “reckless gamble”. Then Burnham said free schools were a “free-for-all, where good schools can be destabilised and where teachers can be employed without teaching qualifications”. But in his first interview, Twigg, the Liverpool West Derby MP, said he would back the setting-up of “free schools” by parents, teachers or non-profit groups if they helped poorer children and the wider community. Twigg said: “On free schools, I am saying that we need to apply a set of tests, that we are not going to take an absolute policy of opposing them. “The tests should be: will the school raise standards for pupils and parents, will it contribute to a narrowing of the achievement gap between rich and poor, and what is the wider impact of that school?” He insisted he was not dramatically shifting the party’s position, adding: “Andy never said he had an absolute policy of opposing free schools either.” The Tories are privately pleased at this shift, believing greater cross-party consensus can only serve to shore up the project that has had a faltering take up. While Burnham was in position, Twigg was disciplined in what he said about education, but during a parliamentary debate in May, he admitted to being “hugely impressed” by free school equivalents in the US – the knowledge is power programme that he described as “a great example of how some of these new, more autonomous schools in the US are delivering”. Labour Free schools Schools Education policy Michael Gove Ed Miliband Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Fight for last uncaptured ground made more deadly by Libyan government forces’ rivalries and inexperience Death and injury arrive suddenly and randomly on the Libyan city of Sirte’s frontline. Sometimes, however, they come with a gruesome symmetry. On Friday, an rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) fired by pro-Gaddafi forces, defending their last pocket of resistance in the city, caused some of the casualties. But it was a mortar fired by the government’s own fighters that caused the most. Both incidents occurred within a few seconds. The fighters were bunched near the frontline on Dubai Street on the southern front occupied mainly by fighters from Misrata when the two rounds came in. “It was a mistake,” said a passing fighter a few minutes later in the chaos as the injured were treated. “The RPG came from Muammar Gaddafi’s forces. But I was close to where the mortar was fired. They fired it straight into the air. It came down on our men. We are shooting our own people.” There were too many casualties at first for the medics at their open-air field station to cope with. So the Guardian’s driver and translator, both medical students who worked during the siege of Misrata in the intensive care unit, helped treat the wounded, more than 20 of them. One was a young fighter brought in limp and pale from shock, hit by shrapnel in the shoulder that had penetrated his neck. Another older man arrived hanging to the back of a jeep, his lacerated scalp bleeding heavily over his clothes, blood bubbling from his mouth. In the small space that the last uncaptured ground in Sirte provides for assaults, such incidents are escalating. Without proper communications and a dangerous rivalry between the forces from Misrata on the pocket’s southern and western fronts, and fighters from Benghazi and the towns to the east, those fighting Gaddafi’s soldiers are killing each other in increasing numbers. Eastern soldiers said three men they lost on Thursday in an attempt to assault the pocket were killed by Misratan fire. Shells and mortars misfired or falling short have killed others while crossfire is commonplace. Two days ago, a shell fired from behind Sirte exploded close to the Guardian’s car near a column of government fighters. Blame has fallen on “weekend fighters”, who are unwilling to go forward and fire from behind their colleagues towards their backs, or inexperienced government troops, who lack the ability to accurately aim their mortar batteries or are ignorant of their targets. The randomness of the government fighter’s fire was underlined on Friday at a battery made up of odds and ends of improvised rocket systems, a recoilless rifle, anti-aircraft guns and an armoured carrier parked on a rise a few hundred metres from the pocket’s southern edge. The Guardian watched rockets from a homemade system on a pickup truck fly in wildly different directions and distances. “I’ve had too many friends die in this fucking city,” said Mhjurb Ibrahim, a lawyer from Misrata. “Twenty-two of them have died. Five in the first day of the fighting.” It is these problems of co-ordination as much as the fierce resistance of the remaining Gaddafi fighters occupying high buildings in Sirte’s District 2 that have slowed up the advance and forced government fighters to bring up tanks and other heavy weapons to pound the buildings occupied by their foes. Shells flew into the tight packed collection of buildings on Friday at a rate of almost one a minute at times, sending up clouds of concrete and white smoke that drifted across the rooftops. “We cannot go into the pocket yet,” said one of the eastern forces’ commanders, Abdul Salam Rishi. “When we tried, there were still too many snipers. So we’ll bomb with artillery and tanks. Then we will attack.” The difficulties of the government in bringing a final end to the siege of Sirte came as a gun battle erupted between revolutionary forces and supporters of Gaddafi in the heart of the Libyan capital, Tripoli, for the first time since the longtime leader was ousted and forced into hiding. Shouting “God is Great”, anti-Gaddafi fighters converged on the Hay Nasr district of the Abu Salim neighbourhood in pickups mounted with weapons, setting up checkpoints and sealing off the area as heavy gunfire echoed through the streets. Fighters at the scene said the shooting began after a group of armed men tried to raise the green flag that symbolises Gaddafi’s regime. Assem al-Bashir, a fighter with Tripoli’s Eagle Brigade, said revolutionary forces suspected there were snipers in the surrounding high rises after spotting a man trying to raise the green flag. Ahmad al-Warsly, from the Zintan brigade, said several Gaddafi supporters apparently planned a protest but drew fire because they were armed. They fled and were pursued by revolutionary forces, prompting fierce street battles. “It seems like it was organised,” he said. “They were planning to have a big demonstration, then the fight started.” The violence in the capital, which has been relatively calm since it was taken in late August, underscores the difficulty Libya’s new rulers face in restoring order as Gaddafi remains on the run. Libya Middle East Africa Muammar Gaddafi Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Matt Taibbi joined the set of Countdown with Keith Olbermann to discuss the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York. After weighing in on whether Mayor Michael Bloomberg might be playing right into the movement’s hands with the upcoming move to try to clear Zuccoti Park , Taibbi discussed his recent article at Rolling Stone where he had some advice for those out there protesting. My Advice to the Occupy Wall Street Protesters : No matter what, I’ll be supporting Occupy Wall Street. And I think the movement’s basic strategy – to build numbers and stay in the fight, rather than tying itself to any particular set of principles – makes a lot of sense early on. But the time is rapidly approaching when the movement is going to have to offer concrete solutions to the problems posed by Wall Street. To do that, it will need a short but powerful list of demands. There are thousands one could make, but I’d suggest focusing on five: 1. Break up the monopolies. The so-called “Too Big to Fail” financial companies – now sometimes called by the more accurate term “Systemically Dangerous Institutions” – are a direct threat to national security. They are above the law and above market consequence, making them more dangerous and unaccountable than a thousand mafias combined. There are about 20 such firms in America, and they need to be dismantled; a good start would be to repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and mandate the separation of insurance companies, investment banks and commercial banks. 2. Pay for your own bailouts. A tax of 0.1 percent on all trades of stocks and bonds and a 0.01 percent tax on all trades of derivatives would generate enough revenue to pay us back for the bailouts, and still have plenty left over to fight the deficits the banks claim to be so worried about. It would also deter the endless chase for instant profits through computerized insider-trading schemes like High Frequency Trading, and force Wall Street to go back to the job it’s supposed to be doing, i.e., making sober investments in job-creating businesses and watching them grow. 3. No public money for private lobbying. A company that receives a public bailout should not be allowed to use the taxpayer’s own money to lobby against him. You can either suck on the public teat or influence the next presidential race, but you can’t do both. Butt out for once and let the people choose the next president and Congress. 4. Tax hedge-fund gamblers. For starters, we need an immediate repeal of the preposterous and indefensible carried-interest tax break, which allows hedge-fund titans like Stevie Cohen and John Paulson to pay taxes of only 15 percent on their billions in gambling income, while ordinary Americans pay twice that for teaching kids and putting out fires. I defy any politician to stand up and defend that loophole during an election year. 5. Change the way bankers get paid. We need new laws preventing Wall Street executives from getting bonuses upfront for deals that might blow up in all of our faces later. It should be: You make a deal today, you get company stock you can redeem two or three years from now. That forces everyone to be invested in his own company’s long-term health – no more Joe Cassanos pocketing multimillion-dollar bonuses for destroying the AIGs of the world.
Continue reading …How Did Obama Know About ‘Fast And Furious’ Before Holder? Obama: I heard about it on the news in March (not likely unless the announcers talked about it during the NCAA tournament.) Well, it was all Blagojevich’s doing! Wait, wrong city, wrong scandal. Uh, um… somebody turn on that damn teleprompter! Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : I Hate The Media Discovery Date : 14/10/2011 01:32 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …In a letter to Congress, President Obama said troops will act as advisers in efforts to hunt down rebel leader Joseph Kony President Barack Obama said Friday he is dispatching roughly 100 US troops to central Africa to help battle the Lord’s Resistance Army, which the administration accuses of a campaign of murder, rape and kidnapping children that spans two decades. In a letter to Congress, Obama said the troops will act as advisers in efforts to hunt down rebel leader Joseph Kony but will not engage in combat except in self-defence. Pentagon officials said the bulk of the US contingent will be special operations troops, who will provide security and combat training to African units. The White House said the first troops arrived in Uganda on Wednesday. Ultimately, they will also deploy in South Sudan, the Central African Republic and Congo. Long considered one of Africa’s most brutal rebel groups, the Lord’s Resistance Army began its attacks in Uganda more than 20 years ago but has been pushing westward. The administration and human rights groups say its atrocities have left thousands dead and have put as many as 300,000 Africans to flight. They have charged the group with seizing children to bolster its ranks of soldiers and sometimes forcing them to become sex slaves. Kony is wanted by the International Criminal Court under a 2005 warrant for crimes against humanity in his native Uganda. Obama’s announcement came in low-key fashion — a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, in which he said the deployment “furthers U.S. national security interests and foreign policy and will be a significant contribution toward counter-LRA efforts in central Africa.” The deployment drew support from Sen. James Inhofe, a Republican who has visited the region. “I have witnessed firsthand the devastation caused by the LRA, and this will help end Kony’s heinous acts that have created a human rights crisis in Africa,” he said in a statement. “I have been fervently involved in trying to prevent further abductions and murders of Ugandan children, and today’s action offers hope that the end of the LRA is in sight.” But Obama’s letter stressed the limited nature of the deployment. “Our forces will provide information, advice and assistance to select partner nation forces,” it said. “Although the US forces are combat-equipped, they will … not themselves engage LRA forces unless necessary for self-defense.” Most of the troops will deploy to regional capitals to work with government officials and military commanders on countering the rebels and protecting civilians, Pentagon officials said. State Department officials portrayed the deployment as part of a larger strategy to combat the group that dates to the Bush administration but also includes legislation passed by Congress this year. Victoria Nuland, a department spokeswoman, said the US troops will aid in “pursuing the LRA and seeking to bring top commanders to justice.” The broader effort includes encouraging rebel fighters to defect, disarm and return to their homes, she said. The administration briefed human rights activists ahead of the announcement, and their officials were encouraged. “These advisers can make a positive difference on the ground by keeping civilians safe and improving military operations to apprehend the LRA’s top commanders,” said Paul Ronan, director of the group Advocacy at Resolve. Col. Felix Kulayigye, Uganda’s military spokesman, said of the troops: “We are aware that they are coming. We are happy about it. We look forward to working with them and eliminating Kony and his fighters.” US politics United States Uganda guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …