Click here to view this media Former vice president Dick Cheney has claimed that people are going to be shocked by his new book, but former Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that the tome was just full of “cheap shots.” Cheney told NBC’s Jamie Gangel last week that there would be “heads exploding all over Washington” when his new memoir “In My Time” was released. “My head isn’t exploding and I haven’t noticed any other heads exploding in Washington, D.C.,” Powell told CBS’ Bob Schieffer Sunday. “What really sort of got my attention was this way in which he characterized it, it’s going to cause heads to explode. That’s quite a visual and in fact, the kind of headline I would expect to come out a gossip column, that’s the kind of headline you might see one of the supermarket tabloids write.” “It was not the kind of headline I would have expected to come from a former Vice President of the United States of America. Mr. Cheney had a long and distinguished career and I hope his book that’s what he would focus on, not these cheap shots that he’s taking at me and other members of the administration who served to the best of our ability for President Bush. “Did the conversations, I mean, the atmosphere within the White House while you were there, how would you characterize it?” Schieffer asked. “I mean, obviously there were disagreements but was it — were these angry disagreements because I know he, in some ways he’s no kinder to your successor, Condoleezza Rice, than he was to you?” “Well he’s taken the same shots at Condi, with an almost condescending tone,” Powell recalled. “She tearfully did this, or that. And he’s taken the same shots at George Tenet. And he has also, in some ways, indicated he didn’t always approve of what President Bush was deciding. And there’s nothing wrong with saying you disagree.” “But it’s not necessary to take these kind of barbs and then try to pump a book up by saying heads will be exploding. That’s even on the headline section of the Nixon Foundation to sell the book. I think it’s a bit too far. I think, Dick overshot the runway with that kind of comment, if that’s how he plans to sell his book.”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Former vice president Dick Cheney has claimed that people are going to be shocked by his new book, but former Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that the tome was just full of “cheap shots.” Cheney told NBC’s Jamie Gangel last week that there would be “heads exploding all over Washington” when his new memoir “In My Time” was released. “My head isn’t exploding and I haven’t noticed any other heads exploding in Washington, D.C.,” Powell told CBS’ Bob Schieffer Sunday. “What really sort of got my attention was this way in which he characterized it, it’s going to cause heads to explode. That’s quite a visual and in fact, the kind of headline I would expect to come out a gossip column, that’s the kind of headline you might see one of the supermarket tabloids write.” “It was not the kind of headline I would have expected to come from a former Vice President of the United States of America. Mr. Cheney had a long and distinguished career and I hope his book that’s what he would focus on, not these cheap shots that he’s taking at me and other members of the administration who served to the best of our ability for President Bush. “Did the conversations, I mean, the atmosphere within the White House while you were there, how would you characterize it?” Schieffer asked. “I mean, obviously there were disagreements but was it — were these angry disagreements because I know he, in some ways he’s no kinder to your successor, Condoleezza Rice, than he was to you?” “Well he’s taken the same shots at Condi, with an almost condescending tone,” Powell recalled. “She tearfully did this, or that. And he’s taken the same shots at George Tenet. And he has also, in some ways, indicated he didn’t always approve of what President Bush was deciding. And there’s nothing wrong with saying you disagree.” “But it’s not necessary to take these kind of barbs and then try to pump a book up by saying heads will be exploding. That’s even on the headline section of the Nixon Foundation to sell the book. I think it’s a bit too far. I think, Dick overshot the runway with that kind of comment, if that’s how he plans to sell his book.”
Continue reading …NTC say man convicted of attack will not be extradited after finding him slipping in and out of coma in palatial Tripoli villa The man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing has been found apparently comatose in a palatial villa in north Tripoli. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi is slipping in and out of a coma and only being kept alive with oxygen and an intravenous drip, according to relatives attending him at the property, which they said had been ransacked by looters who plundered all his medicine. Megrahi, last seen at a televised rally in Tripoli last month alongside Muammar Gaddafi, was tracked down by CNN international correspondent Nic Robertson.”He appears to be a shell of the man that he was, far sicker than he appeared before … at death’s door,” Robertson said. Megrahi’s son, Khaled, told the broadcaster: “There is no doctor, there is nobody to ask and we don’t have a phone line to call anybody.” Megrahi was discovered as the Libyan rebels’ National Transitional Council (NTC) ruled out extraditing him to Britain. The justice minister, Mohammed al-Alagi, said: “We will not give any Libyan citizen to the west. Megrahi has already been judged once and he will not be judged again. We do not hand over Libyan citizens. Gaddafi does.” Megrahi is the only man convicted over the December 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, which killed 270 people, mostly Americans, when it exploded over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. He was freed on 20 August 2009, after prison doctors said he had prostate cancer and probably had only three months to live. East Renfrewshire council, which received regular updates on Megrahi’s condition from the Gaddafi regime, had been trying to locate him after the rebels’ captured the Libyan capital. The Scottish government and East Renfrewshire council issued a joint statement saying there had been contact through Megrahi’s family over the weekend. They said: “There was no evidence of a breach of his licence conditions, and his medical condition is consistent with someone suffering from terminal prostate cancer. Speculation about Megrahi in recent days has been unhelpful, unnecessary and indeed ill-informed.” “As has always been said, Al Megrahi is dying of a terminal disease, and matters regarding his medical condition should really be left there. “It is in no-one’s interest for there to be a running commentary on either Mr Al-Megrahi’s medical condition or location, and we have no intention of providing one. “Any change in Al-Megrahi’s circumstances would be a matter for discussion with the National Transitional Council as the legitimate governing authority in Libya.” The NTC’s comments on extradition are also an apparent blow to British hopes of putting on trial the suspected killer of Yvonne Fletcher, the police officer shot dead in 1984 outside the Libyan embassy. Scotland Yard has identified a former Libyan diplomat as the prime suspect. The foreign secretary, William Hague, welcomed a pledge by the NTC chairman, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, to “co-operate fully” with extradition. But the justice minister’s comments appear to cast doubt on the possibility. No one has been prosecuted over the murder of WC Fletcher. But it has emerged that a witness saw Abdulmagid Salah Ameri, then a junior diplomat, firing a gun from inside the building. Libya has an extradition agreement with the UK, but it covers foreign suspects rather than Libyan nationals. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi Lockerbie plane bombing Extradition Arab and Middle East unrest Scotland Libya Middle East David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media (h/t Heather at VideoCafe ) Damn it, I hate it when this happens. I actually agree with George Will. As I reel from worlds colliding, let’s look at the astonishing admission of wrongness on behalf of a Republican to which George Will wants an apology: WILL: Five hundred and sixty five pages and a simple apology would have been in order in some of them. Which is to say, the great fact of those eight years is we went to war—big war, costly war—under false pretenses. And…to write a memoir in which you say essentially nothing seriously went wrong…if I wrote a memoir of my last week, I would have things to apologize for. Every appearance on This Week offers up the opportunity for Will to apologize for his usual wrongness, but I digress. This is just another example of the after-the-fact tacit admissions of the right wing–who spent the entire decade castigating and criticizing the left for questioning why we were in Iraq, mind you–that the Bush administration did lie us into a war of choice against a nation that posed no threat. But where’s the apology for that from George Will, huh? Weekly appearances on a national news show for the last 28 years and a twice-weekly column since 1978 and you’d think a simple apology–”The left was right about invading Iraq” –would not only be in order, but mentioned at some point in all the platforms Will is privileged to have.
Continue reading …Every air passenger is treated with suspicion since 9/11, regardless of appearance. Global traveller Pico Iyer has had to put up with it all his life I’m sitting in the expansive spaces of Renzo Piano’s four-storey airport outside Osaka, sipping an Awake tea from Starbucks and waiting for my bus home. I’ve chosen to live in Japan for the past 20 years, and I know its rites as I know the way I need tea when feeling displaced, or to head for a righthand window seat as soon as I enter a bus. A small, round-faced Japanese man in his early 30s, accompanied by a tall and somewhat cadaverous man of the same age, approaches me. “Excuse me,” says the small, friendly seeming one; they look like newborn salarymen in their not-quite-perfect suits. “May I see your passport?” When I look up, surprised, he flashes me a badge showing that he’s a plainclothes police officer. Dazed after crossing 16 time zones (from California), I hand him my British passport. “What are you doing in Japan?” “I’m writing about it.” I pull out my business card with the red embossed logo of Time magazine. “Time magazine?” says the smiling cop, strangely impressed. “He works for Time magazine,” he explains to his lanky and impassive partner. “Very famous magazine,” he assures me. “High prestige!” Then he asks for my address and phone number and where I plan to be for the next 89 days. “If there is some unfortunate incident,” he explains, “some terrorist attack” (he’s sotto voce now), “then we will know you did it.” Six months later, I fly back to the country I love once more. This time I need to withdraw some yen from an ATM as I stumble out of my trans-Pacific plane, in order to pay for my bus home. “You’re getting some money?” says an attractive young Japanese woman, suddenly appearing beside me with a smile. “I am. To go back to my apartment.” “You live here?” Few Japanese women have ever come up to me in public, let alone without an introduction, and shown such interest. “I do.” “May I see your passport?” she asks sweetly, flashing a badge at me, much as the pair of questioners had done two seasons before. “Just security,” she says, anxious not to put me out, as my Japanese neighbours stream, unconcerned, towards the Gakuenmae bus that’s about to pull out of its bay. I tell my friends back in California about these small disruptions and they look much too knowing. It’s 9/11, they assure me. Over the past decade, security has tightened around the world, which means that insecurity has increased proportionally. Indeed, in recent years Japan has introduced fingerprinting for all foreign visitors arriving at its airports, and takes photographs of every outsider coming across its borders; a large banner on the wall behind the immigration officers in Osaka – as angry-looking with its red-and-black hand-lettering as a student banner – explains the need for heightened measures in the wake of threats to national order. But the truth of the matter is that, for those of us with darker skins, and from nations not materially privileged, it was ever thus. When I was 18, I was held in custody in Panama’s airport (because of the Indian passport I then carried) and denied formal entry to the nation, while the roguish English friend from high school with whom I was travelling was free to enter with impunity and savour all the dubious pleasures of the Canal Zone. On my way into Hong Kong – a transit lounge of a city if ever there was one, a duty-free zone whose only laws seem to be those of the marketplace – I was hauled into a special cabin for a lengthy interrogation because my face was deemed not to match my (by then British) passport. In Japan I was stripsearched every time I returned to the country, three or four times a year – my lifelong tan moving the authorities to assume that I must be either Saddam Hussein’s cousin or an illegal Iranian (or, worst of all, what I really am, a wandering soul with Indian forebears). Once I was sent to a small room in Tokyo reserved for anyone of South Asian ancestry (where bejewelled women in saris loudly complained in exaggerated Oxbridge accents about being taken for common criminals). Another time, long before my Japanese neighbours had heard of Osama bin Laden, I was even detained on my way out of Osaka – and the British Embassy hastily faxed on a Sunday night – as if any male with brown skin, passable English and a look of shabby quasi-respectability must be doing something wrong if he’s crossing a border. But now, having learned over decades to accept such indignities or injustices, I walk into a chorus of complaints every time I return to California, from my pale-skinned, affluent neighbours. They’re patting us down now, my friends object, and they’re confiscating our contact-lens fluid. They’re forcing us to travel with tiny tubes of toothpaste and moving us to wear loafers when usually we’d prefer lace-ups. They’re taking away every bottle of water – but only after bottles of water have been shown to be weapons of mass destruction; they’re feeling us up with blue gloves, even here in Santa Barbara, now that they know that underwear can be a lethal weapon. I listen to their grousing and think that the one thing the 9/11 attacks have achieved, for those of us who spend too much time in airports, is to make suspicion universal; fear and discomfort are equal-opportunity employers now. The world is flat in ways the high-flying global theoreticians don’t always acknowledge; these days, even someone from the materially fortunate parts of the world – a man with a ruddy complexion, a woman in a Prada suit – is pulled aside for what is quixotically known as “random screening”. It used to be that the rich corners of the world seemed relatively safe, protected, and the poor ones too dangerous to enter. Now, the logic of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington has reversed all that. If anything, it’s the rich places that feel unsettled. It used to be that officials would alight on people who look like me – from nations of need, in worn jeans, bearing the passports of more prosperous countries – as likely troublemakers; now they realise that even the well-born and well-dressed may not always be well-intentioned. I understand why my friends feel aggrieved to be treated as if they came from Nigeria or Mexico or India. But I can’t really mourn too much that airports, since 9/11, have become places where everyone may be taken to be guilty until proven innocent. The world is all mixed up these days, and America can no longer claim immunity. On 12 September 2001, Le Monde ran its now famous headline: We are all Americans. On 12 September 2011, it might more usefully announce: We are all Indians. The Terminal Check was originally published in Granta 116: 10 Years Later, available now. Pico Iyer will be in conversation about his work in Granta at Asia House on 5 September. For tickets and information, visit AsiaHouse.org. Global terrorism guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Iraqi officials say Khalid al-Fahdawi, a Sunni member of the Iraqi parliament, was among those confirmed dead A suicide bomber blew himself up inside Baghdad’s largest Sunni mosque last night, killing 29 people during prayers, in a strike on a place of worship similar to the one that brought Iraq to the brink of civil war five years ago. Iraqi security officials said Iraqi parliament member Khalid al-Fahdawi, a Sunni, was among the dead in the attack. Major General Qassim al-Moussawi, a spokesman for Baghdad’s military operations command, confirmed the bombing happened inside the Um al-Qura mosque during prayers in the western Baghdad neighbourhood of al-Jamiah. The blue-domed building is the largest Sunni mosque in Baghdad. “I heard something like a very severe wind storm, with smoke and darkness, and shots by the guards,” said eyewitness Mohammad Mustafa. No group immediately claimed responsibility for Sunday’s bombing, but suicide attacks generally are a hallmark of al-Qaida, which is dominated by Sunnis. Intelligence officials have speculated that al-Qaida will do almost anything to re-ignite sectarian violence, but the group has been recently focusing on attacking Iraqi security forces and the government to prove how unstable Iraq remains. Two security officials and medics at two Baghdad hospitals put the casualty toll at 29 dead and 38 wounded. In a statement, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki called on Iraqis to stand strong against terrorists and “pursue them wherever they are. “Solidarity and unity, and standing as one line behind the army and the police, are the only way to eliminate this danger, which does not differentiate between the Iraqis and targets all of us,” Maliki said. The strike happened hours after the UN’s outgoing top diplomat in Iraq, Ad Melkert, said the government in Baghdad must determine whether its security forces are strong enough to stop violence before requiring American troops to leave at the end of the
Continue reading …Millions across eastern seaboard left without power and at risk of flooding despite hurricane being downgraded to tropical storm New York breathed a sigh of relief on Sunday after hurricane Irene caused far less damage in the city than feared, but the storm still caused deaths, serious floods and power blackouts affecting more than a million people as it swept up the north-eastern seaboard of the United States. Irene weakened quickly after making landfall near Atlantic City, New Jersey, at about 5.30am local time. By the time it made landfall again, at Coney Island four hours later, Irene had been downgraded by the National Hurricane Center to a tropical storm with winds at around 65mph – much weaker than the 85mph that was forecast late on Saturday. But while the storm failed to bring the devastating surge that had been feared in New York, it was still powerful enough to cause three deaths and widespread damage in outer suburbs and neighbouring states. In New Jersey a 20-year-old woman was found dead in her car on a flooded rural road. The woman, who has not yet been identified, had earlier called police after she and her car were washed away by a flash flood. “She left her house, went in her car and was swept away,” said New Jersey governor Chris Christie. About 30 miles (48km) north-west of Manhattan in New York’s Rockland County, a man was electrocuted by a downed power line after he tried to save a child who had gone out into a flooded street that had live wires, officials said. The child is now in hospital in a serious condition. And in Prospect, Connecticut another person was killed in a fire that investigators believe was sparked by fallen wires. After passing New York the storm continued north, causing extensive flooding in upstate New York, Connecticut and New England. President Barack Obama warned the storm and its aftermath were not over: “This is a storm that has claimed lives. Our thoughts and prayers are with those who have lost loved ones,” he said. “Many Americans are still at serious risk of power outages and flooding which could get worse in the coming days. I want people to understand that this is not over.” The death toll now stands at more than 15 with lives lost all along the storm’s track from the Carolinas to Virginia and up through Pennsylvania, where a man was killed in his tent by a falling tree, to New York and beyond. A nuclear reactor in Maryland was shut down after it was damaged by wind. Others were taken offline or were operating at reduced capacity as precautionary measures. More than six million homes and businesses lost power as the storm passed up the east coast. Two million people were warned or ordered to flee its path. The storm also spawned tornadoes in parts of Virginia, New Jersey and Delaware. A twister destroyed 15 buildings in the popular holiday town of Lewes in Delaware. Flooding is likely to be a major problem this week. Parts of Philadelphia were heavily flooded, with water reaching street-sign levels in some areas. Flash flood warnings were issued up and down eastern and central Pennsylvania. “The rivers may not crest until Tuesday or Wednesday. This isn’t just a 24-hour event,” Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett said on Sunday. Irene lost power in New York but continued to cause havoc as it moved north. More than 100,000 homes were left without electricity in Rhode Island. Delaware was soaked by 25cm of rain. The storm waters came on top of unusually high downpours earlier this month and have lead to fears of flooding inland as rivers burst their banks. New York’s public transport system is likely to be disrupted next week. On Sunday, transport workers waited for winds to die down before they were able to inspect train and subway lines. New York governor Andrew Cuomo said it was too early to say when normal service would be resumed. The region’s major airports were closed on Sunday and were likely to be closed for at least part of Monday as airlines waited for transport systems to be restored so passengers could reach them. Hurricane Irene Natural disasters and extreme weather United States New York Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Khalid al-Fahdawi, a member of the Iraqi parliament, reported to have been killed in blast at capital’s largest Sunni mosque A suicide bomber has killed at least 29 people and wounded at least 38 more at Baghdad’s largest Sunni mosque. Security officials said Khalid al-Fahdawi, a member of the Iraqi parliament, was among the dead. A spokesman for Baghdad’s military operations command confirmed that the bombing happened inside the Umm al-Qura mosque during prayers in the western Baghdad neighborhood of al-Jamiaah. No group immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing. The attack took place as Sunnis were praying at a service during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which ends on Tuesday. Iraq Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media As Ed Schultz noted earlier this week , it looks Sen. John McCain, who’s done nothing but criticize President Obama at every turn for his handling of the situation in Libya, has a little explaining to do. This Friday, Chris Hayes went after him for talking tough and playing the bully, when in reality he’s just another deal making politician who will cozy up with dictators if he feels it’s necessary. Here’s more on the leaked cable from Politico — Leaked cable: John McCain pushed to arm Qadhafi : A leaked U.S. diplomatic cable shows that Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain promised to help Libyan dictator Muammar Qadhafi obtain U.S. military hardware in 2009. The cable, released by the open information group WikiLeaks , reveals the pledge came at meeting that was attended by other prominent members of Congress, including Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.). In the meeting, Muatassim Qadhafi, the Libyan leader’s fifth son and national security adviser, requested U.S. assistance in obtaining military supplies, both lethal and non-lethal. The cable indicates that McCain was the dominant voice among the congressional delegation in a push for military hardware for Qadhafi. “Sen. McCain assured Muatassim that the United States wanted to provide Libya with the equipment it needs for its … security,” according to the cable. McCain said that he understood the need for Libya to upgrade its existing ranks of C-130 Hercules aircraft. Libya had bought eight of the military cargo aircraft in the 1970s, but as bilateral relationships with the United States deteriorated, a ban of arms sales prevented the aircraft from being moved to North Africa. McCain pledged to do what he could to move the issue forward in Congress. McCain stressed that Libya needed to fulfill its commitments of giving up its weapons of mass destruction in order for bilateral engagement to go forward. Brian Rogers, communications director for McCain, said in a statement to POLITICO that the Arizona Republican never made any promises to Libya and never acted to help the Qadhafi regime. “At no point did Senator McCain ever promise to help the Qaddafi regime secure U.S. military assistance. Upon the his return to Washington, there were no follow-up discussions and no action taken by Senator McCain or his staff to provide the Qaddafi regime with C-130s or any other military assistance,” said Rogers. “There has been no greater champion than Senator McCain for Libya’s democratic revolution and for the toppling of the brutal Qaddafi regime.”
Continue reading …Chances of a clear winner are unlikely, so five candidates will be narrowed down to two to ensure a decision Japan’s trade minister, Banri Kaieda, on Sunday looked to be the frontrunner during the final day of campaigning in elections for the country’s next prime minister. The chances, however, looked slim for a majority-winning vote in the first round, so an immediate run-off was expected between the two top candidates. The election winner becomes prime minister owing to the Democratic Party of Japan’s majority in parliament’s lower house. Five candidates – former foreign minister Seiji Maehara, the finance minister, Yoshihiko Noda, former transport minister Sumio Mabuchi, the farm minister, Michihiko Kano, and Kaieda – are vying for the votes of DPJ peers. The next leader, who will succeed the outgoing prime minister, Naoto Kan, will be Japan’s sixth in five years. Whoever wins faces huge challenges, including a resurgent yen that threatens exports, the forging of a new energy policy following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster, and the raising of funds to rebuild after the tsunami in the spring and pay for ballooning social welfare costs. The obstacles to governing, including a divided parliament and internal party bickering, have raised concerns that the next premier, to be selected in the DPJ vote on Monday, will end up being another short-lived leader. “Unfortunately, chances are that whoever wins, we’ll be going through the same debate in 12 months,” said Jesper Koll, director of equities research at JP Morgan in Tokyo. None of the candidates appear to have presented any detailed vision of how to end Japan’s decades of stagnation. “Their positions already seem to have been watered down,” Koll said. The party leadership race, instead, has been a battle between allies and critics of the party powerbroker Ichiro Ozawa, 69, a mastermind who leads the party’s biggest group despite facing trial on charges concerning political donations. Kaieda, who has secured the backing of Ozawa, had support from about 115 of the 398 Democratic lawmakers eligible to vote in Monday’s party election Maehara, 49, who sees beating deflation as the priority, has been jostling with the fiscal hawk Noda, 54, and Kano, 69, for second place, according to the Mainichi newspaper, while Mabuchi 51, lagged behind. Maehara ‘s chances have been undercut by rivalry with Noda, as well as by the scandal of his accepting donations from a Korean resident of Japan. If he won he would become the nation’s youngest prime minister since the second world war. On Saturday, Maehara told a news conference that he had received more than $7,000 in donations from four foreigners and one firm led by a foreigner, between 2005 and 2010, but had not been aware of the donations, Japanese media reported. Whoever takes over from Kan, who resigned as party head on Friday after months of criticism over his handling of the nuclear accident, will face a struggle to implement policies in a “twisted” parliament where opposition parties control the upper house and can block bills. Maehara and Noda on Sunday reiterated their call for a “grand coalition” with the main opposition parties. But Kaieda rejected the idea. “In a democratic parliamentary system a grand coalition is not preferable,” he said during a debate on NHK TV. Feuds over the role of Ozawa, a one-time heavyweight in the conservative Liberal Democratic party, who helped briefly oust the long-dominant party in 1993, have rattled the Democrats since his party merged with the DPJ in 2003. Some credit Ozawa’s political skills with engineering the Democrats’ leap to power in the August 2009 election. Others say his scandal-tainted image is damaging the party, which has seen its support sink among voters disillusioned with its failure to deliver on promises of bold changes in the way Japan is governed. Ozawa, who lost a tough leadership race to Kan last year, cannot vote in Monday’s party poll since his DPJ membership was suspended following his indictment over the funding scandal. Japan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …