Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 97)

Thom Hartmann, broadcasting from Netroots Nation 11, sat down with the United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard. The two discussed the need to have a buy American, build in America program to get Americans back to work again and how any efforts to do that ended up being stifled in the Senate during the first two years of Obama’s presidency. As they noted, Nancy Pelosi managed to get a lot of good bills passed in the House that would have put countless numbers of Americans to work, only to see them die a slow death in the Senate with filibuster after filibuster. And sadly as they pointed out, all that we’ve got coming out of the House now is one bill after the other demanding more tax cuts for the rich. Gerard expressed his hopes that Republicans get wiped out in the House the next election and said he’s going to do all he can to see that that happens. If the Democrats wise up and adopt his rhetoric on protectionism meaning protecting American jobs, perhaps they will.

Continue reading …
Tim Pawlenty’s Birther Ally Calls Obama A "Jungle Alien" in NH House Party

Click here to view this media What Tim Pawlenty is finding out–or maybe he already knew–is that the GOP has descended into a John Birch/John Galt party because of the FOXation of the party and some of its members reveling in racism. Mother Jones: During his recent swing through New Hampshire for CNN’s presidential debate, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty courted more than a hundred Republicans at a house party in the town of North Conway. But the Pawlenty campaign’s choice of a host for the event, which was arranged by the candidate’s regional field manager in the Granite State, was nothing if not controversial. The party took place at the home of Ray Shakir, a local Republican activist and retired construction executive, who calls President Obama a “jungle alien,” Hillary Clinton “Osama’s dream girl,” and once labeled certain disabled children “uneducatable” and thus undeserving of taxpayer-funded schooling. In an interview, Shakir says Pawlenty addressed tough issues at the house party, such as cutting subsidies for corn ethanol and implementing right-to-work legislation, which would allow employees to opt out of union membership but still receive union-won benefits. Shakir praises Pawlenty as “a real nice guy, very gregarious,” adding, “at this point in the game, Tim Pawlenty is my choice for president.” The Breitbarts of wingnutopia can scream the word racism as much and as loud as they want in an attempt to cheapen its meaning, but it doesn’t change the fact that that’s exactly what the party has embraced. We saw it during the August Townhall meeting during the health care debate and Pawlenty is actively courting them on his presidential run. Check out some of the other insane things Shakir has said in the past: You can call me a birther if you want.” Shakir claims the long-form birth certificate recently released by the Obama administration is merely a clever forgery. (The Pawlenty campaign did not respond to a request for comment.) Moving to other issues, Shakir called human-caused climate change “bullshit” and accused liberals of “trying to destroy this country.” “They’re brainwashing people,” he says Shakir has a history of rhetorical flamethrowing. He’s referred to President Obama as “Borat Hussein O’Bummer” and suggested he is “a radical, subversive, con-artist fraud.” — In response to a special education official who said there was “no such thing as an uneducatable person,” Shakir told a gym full of citizens: “I would dispute that fact. There are certainly individuals that are uneducateable. I am simply suggesting to you and everybody else that there should be a line drawn where the taxpayer is responsible to educate certain people.” Shakir’s statement drew a chorus of boos, calls to resign, and even a comparison to Hitler. To which Shakir responded, “If you don’t like it, that’s the way it is. You people are divorced from reality.” Andy Kroll asks a question in his great piece that he really doesn’t answer: Q) But why did the Pawlenty campaign, running on a “Time for Truth” message, turn to Shakir, an activist whose eyebrow-raising comments on a range of topics fly in the face of that theme? enlarge A) Because that’s who the GOP of today are. Simple.

Continue reading …
Saudi Arabia women test driving ban

It was not a mass movement but about 30 or 40 women across the country took the wheel At just after 10 o’clock on Friday morning Maha al-Qahtani swapped places with her husband, Mohammed, and took the wheel of the family car. For the next 50 minutes, she drove through the Saudi capital, along the six-lane King Fahd Road, through Cairo Square, down the upmarket Olaya Street with its shopping malls, Starbucks, Apple store and boutiques. “No one tried to stop us. No one even looked,” the 39-year-old civil servant said. “We drove past police cars but had no trouble.” In fact, the biggest problem for Qahtani was her husband sitting next to her. “He kept telling me to slow down or speed up. He was very fussy,” she said. This is Saudi Arabia, the only country in the world that bans women from driving motor vehicles. Qahtani was part of a small but striking movement of women determined to do something about it. The exact number of Saudi women who protested was unclear. It was certainly not a mass movement. By mid-afternoon a handful had driven in Riyadh, a few in the southern port city of Jeddah, a couple in Dammam in the east, perhaps 30 or 40 overall in a country with a population of 27 million including migrant labourers. But it was a breakthrough. In the closed and authoritarian kingdom, such open and premeditated dissent is extremely rare. Under the spotlight of international attention, Saudi Arabia’s rulers had clearly decided to allow the protest to go ahead. “It is not the issue of women’s driving itself which poses a problem, it is the challenge to authority,” said a political analyst, Khaled al-Dhakil. “But … change is eroding that authority.” This was the closest Saudi Arabia has yet got to the revolutionary upheavals of the Arab spring. A “day of rage” declared in March was, outside areas dominated by the Shia minority, a non-event. A lack of tradition of public protest and heavy security presence rapidly ended any efforts at mobilisation. Last month seven women were arrested for driving. Manal al-Sharif, a 32-year-old who had posted a video on the internet of herself at the wheel, was held for 10 days , made to sign a pledge not to drive again and banned from talking to the media. On Friday, a different mood prevailed. Police appeared to be under orders not to intervene. In Jeddah, one woman said she had been detained by soldiers and escorted home. Others reported being ignored. But when Qahtani, who holds American and international driving licenses, tried driving again in the afternoon, she was stopped after 30 minutes by police, given a ticket for driving without a Saudi licence, and sent home. The question now is whether this signals forthcoming concessions from the authorities. King Abdullah, a relative moderate reigning since 2005, is known to be sympathetic but constrained by a conservative religious establishment. The support of the clergy has been crucial to the house of Al Saud and successive kings have been careful not to antagonise them. Earlier this year, clerics issued a fatwa against challenging the royal family’s authority. Many clerics claim the driving ban prevents vice by stopping women interacting with male strangers – despite the enforced proximity with a hired driver. Wajeha al-Huwaider, the activist who filmed Sharif’s drive, said the “big campaign” might make the government rethink. “Driving is a basic simple right. Denying it is hurting the image of the country. Even if the ban is nothing to do with religion, it is also hurting the image of Islam,” she said. Social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook have been key for the women drivers, providing support networks and, crucially, publicity outside the kingdom. The legal situation is unclear. Supporters say it is justified by both religious fatwas and the rulers’ own statements. Critics say there is nothing in Islam to back the ban and that there has never been a royal decree. Women in Saudi Arabia are also banned from voting or from leaving home without a male guardian. Previous campaigns to overturn the ban have failed. One, in 1991, resulted in nearly 50 women who drove losing their jobs and being banned from foreign travel. The critical question now is broader public opinion. Those driving on Friday come from a small – if growing – element of Saudi society. Saad, a 24-year-old engineer who recently returned from government-sponsored studies in the US, said that Saudis should “get over” the issue. “There are much more important issues here than women driving. We need to be more broad-minded,” he said. But many others disagree. Abdullah al-Otaiba, who trades camels on the outskirts of Riyadh, said that women driving was a “bad idea”. “You have your ways of doing things in the west and that’s fine for you. We are conservative people. We are not democratic. We have another religion and women should not go alone,” he said. There is room for compromise – the most likely outcome, experts says. Some younger clerics would accept women being allowed to drive in case of emergency. The women, most of whom learned to drive overseas, say their campaign will continue until a royal decree is issued allowing them to drive “without any conditions”. “It’s our right. We have to have it. We will continue until we can decide ourselves,” said Maha al-Qahtani. “I’m really excited,” said Eman Nafjan, 32, who drove round her Riyadh neighbourhood for 15 minutes . “We need to do it again.” Saudi Arabia Women Middle East Islam Religion Gender Arab and Middle East unrest Jason Burke guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Saudi Arabia women test driving ban

It was not a mass movement but about 30 or 40 women across the country took the wheel At just after 10 o’clock on Friday morning Maha al-Qahtani swapped places with her husband, Mohammed, and took the wheel of the family car. For the next 50 minutes, she drove through the Saudi capital, along the six-lane King Fahd Road, through Cairo Square, down the upmarket Olaya Street with its shopping malls, Starbucks, Apple store and boutiques. “No one tried to stop us. No one even looked,” the 39-year-old civil servant said. “We drove past police cars but had no trouble.” In fact, the biggest problem for Qahtani was her husband sitting next to her. “He kept telling me to slow down or speed up. He was very fussy,” she said. This is Saudi Arabia, the only country in the world that bans women from driving motor vehicles. Qahtani was part of a small but striking movement of women determined to do something about it. The exact number of Saudi women who protested was unclear. It was certainly not a mass movement. By mid-afternoon a handful had driven in Riyadh, a few in the southern port city of Jeddah, a couple in Dammam in the east, perhaps 30 or 40 overall in a country with a population of 27 million including migrant labourers. But it was a breakthrough. In the closed and authoritarian kingdom, such open and premeditated dissent is extremely rare. Under the spotlight of international attention, Saudi Arabia’s rulers had clearly decided to allow the protest to go ahead. “It is not the issue of women’s driving itself which poses a problem, it is the challenge to authority,” said a political analyst, Khaled al-Dhakil. “But … change is eroding that authority.” This was the closest Saudi Arabia has yet got to the revolutionary upheavals of the Arab spring. A “day of rage” declared in March was, outside areas dominated by the Shia minority, a non-event. A lack of tradition of public protest and heavy security presence rapidly ended any efforts at mobilisation. Last month seven women were arrested for driving. Manal al-Sharif, a 32-year-old who had posted a video on the internet of herself at the wheel, was held for 10 days , made to sign a pledge not to drive again and banned from talking to the media. On Friday, a different mood prevailed. Police appeared to be under orders not to intervene. In Jeddah, one woman said she had been detained by soldiers and escorted home. Others reported being ignored. But when Qahtani, who holds American and international driving licenses, tried driving again in the afternoon, she was stopped after 30 minutes by police, given a ticket for driving without a Saudi licence, and sent home. The question now is whether this signals forthcoming concessions from the authorities. King Abdullah, a relative moderate reigning since 2005, is known to be sympathetic but constrained by a conservative religious establishment. The support of the clergy has been crucial to the house of Al Saud and successive kings have been careful not to antagonise them. Earlier this year, clerics issued a fatwa against challenging the royal family’s authority. Many clerics claim the driving ban prevents vice by stopping women interacting with male strangers – despite the enforced proximity with a hired driver. Wajeha al-Huwaider, the activist who filmed Sharif’s drive, said the “big campaign” might make the government rethink. “Driving is a basic simple right. Denying it is hurting the image of the country. Even if the ban is nothing to do with religion, it is also hurting the image of Islam,” she said. Social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook have been key for the women drivers, providing support networks and, crucially, publicity outside the kingdom. The legal situation is unclear. Supporters say it is justified by both religious fatwas and the rulers’ own statements. Critics say there is nothing in Islam to back the ban and that there has never been a royal decree. Women in Saudi Arabia are also banned from voting or from leaving home without a male guardian. Previous campaigns to overturn the ban have failed. One, in 1991, resulted in nearly 50 women who drove losing their jobs and being banned from foreign travel. The critical question now is broader public opinion. Those driving on Friday come from a small – if growing – element of Saudi society. Saad, a 24-year-old engineer who recently returned from government-sponsored studies in the US, said that Saudis should “get over” the issue. “There are much more important issues here than women driving. We need to be more broad-minded,” he said. But many others disagree. Abdullah al-Otaiba, who trades camels on the outskirts of Riyadh, said that women driving was a “bad idea”. “You have your ways of doing things in the west and that’s fine for you. We are conservative people. We are not democratic. We have another religion and women should not go alone,” he said. There is room for compromise – the most likely outcome, experts says. Some younger clerics would accept women being allowed to drive in case of emergency. The women, most of whom learned to drive overseas, say their campaign will continue until a royal decree is issued allowing them to drive “without any conditions”. “It’s our right. We have to have it. We will continue until we can decide ourselves,” said Maha al-Qahtani. “I’m really excited,” said Eman Nafjan, 32, who drove round her Riyadh neighbourhood for 15 minutes . “We need to do it again.” Saudi Arabia Women Middle East Islam Religion Gender Arab and Middle East unrest Jason Burke guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cloud Engines recalls potentially flammable Pogoplug Video

Looks like sharing videos over the cloud may be a risky task — if you’re using the box shown here on the left, that is. The Pogoplug Video hit the retail scene about two months ago , but Cloud Engines has already issued a recall after two devices nearly went up in flames. According to The Official Pogoplug Blog, the internal chip that handles video encoding can experience ” thermal runaways ” after long periods of use, which could cause the device to reach unsafe temperatures; this despite having a fan to keep things cool. The affected serial numbers include Pogo P-11 through 14, and the company asks that owners get in contact to setup a return and refund. In the meantime, it also suggests that the units be unplugged — a good idea if you want to avoid possibly burning the house down . Cloud Engines recalls potentially flammable Pogoplug Video originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
The Blatant Liberalism of Norah O’Donnell, CBS’s New Chief WH Correspondent

“If Time-magaziner-turned-White House-press-sec Jay Carney ever tires of defending President Obama,” wrote NB's Mark Finkelstein earlier this year, “Norah O'Donnell clearly seems ready to step in.” News broke Thursday that O'Donnell will, in fact, be moving to the White House briefing room, but she'll staying on the same side of the podium as CBS's Chief White House Correspondent . But that doesn't mean her relentless cheerleaeding for the Obama administration and its party will relent. O'Donnell is one of television news's more blatantly liberal non-prime time personalities. In light of the move, let's review just a few of her “greatest hits.” O'Donnell is of course quick to see racism in criticism of President Obama. When Newt Gingrich jibed Obama for wasting time playing basketball, she saw racism . The comment “suggests that the President is an athlete and some people may suggest, you know, because all black people are good athletes.” Fellow guests on Morning Joe laughed at the claim. Though not as frequent as the racism charge, Islamophobia is a popular one among liberal media types. O'Donnell is no exception. In the midst of the debate over the “Ground Zero mosque,” for instance, O'Donnell claimed that the project's opponents were “act[ing] like the people who attacked America and killed 3,000 people.” Other conservative protests have also earned O'Donnell's scorn. She was of course part of the MSNBC chorus that attempted to link the Tea Party movement to so-called “birthed” movement. So as one might expect, the Tea Party's primary target earned O'Donnell's effusive praise – often in spite of the facts. Reporting on the so-called health care “summit” last year, O'Donnell embarked on a misguided attempt at “truth-squadding.” She heaped praise on President Obama for laying out the facts behind his reform proposal, such as the fact, by her telling, that insurance premiums would decline by 10 to 13 percent under Obamacare. In fact, the CBO score at the time showed premiums for individuals would rise by 10 to 13 percent. Giving O'Donnell the benefit of the doubt, she played defense for the president without bothering to check the facts. As for Republican efforts to block Obamacare's passage, well, let's just say O'Donnell was not a fan. “Are you the Grinch that stole Christmas?” she asked GOP Sen. Judd Gregg in December 2009. For all of O'Donnell's fondness for Obama, she really does not like Sarah Palin. Norah appeared at a Palin book signing – crib notes in hand – last year to grill a teen Palin fan, but threw softballs to a pro-Obamacare child weeks later. O'Donnell's lame defense of Obama's decision to wear a tacky faux-military leather jacket to an address to troops in Afghanistan was a childish “Sarah Palin wears a leather jacket too!” Norah also harped on the Palin “hand note” non-story perhaps longer than any other television personality. Filmmaker John Ziegler even called on NBC to fire O'Donnell for her vehement hatred of everything Palin. The firing never came, but now O'Donnell has left for another network where, no doubt, the Palin hatred and the rest of the liberal quips will continue.

Continue reading …
Pawlenty gets glitter-bombed by Code Pink

Is there a trend here…lol. ( Huff Po ): First they targeted former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Now the glitterati have struck former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, in hopes of drawing attention to his opposition to the policy priorities of both gay and women’s rights advocates. On Thursday, representatives from the groups Reproductive Rights and CODEPINK showered Pawlenty with sparkly pink confetti… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Pam’s House Blend Discovery Date : 17/06/2011 00:43 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
Lawmakers mock Obama claim on Libya hostilities

WASHINGTON-Republicans and Democrats on Thursday derided President Barack Obama’s claim that U.S. air attacks against Libya do not constitute hostilities and demanded that the commander in chief seek congressional approval for the 3-month-old military operation. In an escalating constitutional fight, House Speaker John Boehner threatened to withhold money for the mission, pitting a Congress eager to exercise its power of the purse against a dug-in White House. The Ohio Republican signaled that the House could take action as early as next week. “The accumulated consequence of all this delay, confusion and obfuscation has been a wholesale revolt in Congress against the administration’s…

Continue reading …
My Job Offer for Anthony Weiner

Mr. Weiner: After having learned of your sudden and compelled resignation from your Congressional post, I would like to make you an offer of employment at Flynt Management Group, LLC in our Internet group. As a Congressman, you are known for your intensity and perseverance. I believe that this attitude, combined with your service in the House of Representatives’ Committee on Energy and Commerce, will make you a valuable asset to this corporation. This offer is not made in jest. To show our sincerity, Flynt Management Group, LLC is willing to pay twenty percent more than your former Congressional salary, ensuring that your medical benefits would be equal to what you were previously receiving. While you will have to relocate to our corporate offices in Beverly Hills, California, we would pay for all relocation costs. Again, I cannot emphasize enough the genuineness of this offer. We are a serious corporation which, as you know, has been heavily involved in the political environment of this country for over thirty-five years. Our key missions have consistently included the crucial fight of battling hypocrisy within the federal and state governments. Flynt Management Group, LLC and Hustler Magazine have been dedicated to decades of serious political commentary. Just as we do not undertake insincere political crusades, we do not make insincere job offers. While this employment opportunity is being offered in large part due to your qualifications and clear passion for making a change, I feel that your unfortunate resignation is a prime example of unfounded political pressure and the hypocrisy that has invaded democracy in Washington D.C. I hope you will sincerely consider this offer, and I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Larry C. Flynt

Continue reading …

The horrors of war : I wrote last week about the terrifying possibility that Colonel Gadhafi’s soldiers could be using rape as a weapon of war – and even exacerbating their efforts with Viagra. Now, Pascale Harter of the BBC is reporting on what happens to the victims of rape in Libya, especially the women who become pregnant as a result of the sexual attack. According to aid workers, many of these women are murdered by their families in honor killings. “In Libya when rape occurs, it seems to be a whole village or town which is seen to be dishonoured,” Arafat Jamal, an employee of the United Nations’ refugee agency, explained. The most distressing aspect of these horrible killings is the fact that the families think they are helping the women they murder – by protecting them from dishonor. In some ways, they probably *are* helping them, as sick and twisted as that sounds. Their lives are a living hell, the knowledge of that violent attack will mark them for as long as they live. In a culture where women dare not leave the house without being covered head to toe, that’s ostensibly a living death sentence to them anyway.

Continue reading …