Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 92)

Since the US involvement in Libya began in March, public opinion has just about reversed: 46% of respondents in a new Gallup poll disapprove of the action and 39% approve. The poll comes as the House of Representatives is expected to vote today to strip funding for the operation, though…

Continue reading …
Some History About Michele Bachmann’s Radical Religious Right Agenda

Click here to view this media (h/t Digby for reminding me about the above video) Michele Bachmann received many positive reviews of her performance during the CNN GOP debate a few weeks ago by many famous TV pundits: Gloria Borger, CNN chief political analyst “I think she sort of stepped out of Sarah Palin’s shadow tonight. She was clearly one of the best-prepped candidates here. She let people know the depth of her experience on the intelligence committee, for example. David Gergen, CNN senior political analyst: “But Michele Bachmann, I thought, was the biggest surprise, because she was — I don’t think the country knew her well. She was pithy. She spoke in a much more cleaner sentences. She sprinkled interesting facts into it. And she introduced her biography. The 23 foster children, she said that twice.” Bloggers like myself and many others have followed her for years because of the insane and utterly ridiculous statements she’s made on the House floor and TV. Let’s just say her statements have always made me chuckle, but I’m laughing harder at the talking heads’ review of her performance. I doubt you’ll hear much about her history of religious fanaticism from the punditocracy unfortunately because why would cable pundits do some journalistic research, right? Enter Matt Taibbi, who serves up a must read article in Rolling Stone called: Michele Bachmann’s Holy War . He doesn’t think anyone should make the mistake of laughing at her: Young Michele found Jesus at age 16, not long before she went away to Winona State University and met a doltish, like-minded believer named Marcus Bachmann. After finishing college, the two committed young Christians moved to Oklahoma, where Michele entered one of the most ridiculous learning institutions in the Western Hemisphere, a sort of highway rest area with legal accreditation called the O.W. Coburn School of Law; Michele was a member of its inaugural class in 1979. Originally a division of Oral Roberts University, this august academy, dedicated to the teaching of “the law from a biblical worldview,” has gone through no fewer than three names — including the Christian Broadcasting Network School of Law. Those familiar with the darker chapters in George W. Bush’s presidency might recognize the school’s current name, the Regent University School of Law. Yes, this was the tiny educational outhouse that, despite being the 136th-ranked law school in the country, where 60 percent of graduates flunked the bar, produced a flood of entrants into the Bush Justice Department. Regent was unabashed in its desire that its graduates enter government and become “change agents” who would help bring the law more in line with “eternal principles of justice,” i.e., biblical morality. To that end, Bachmann was mentored by a crackpot Christian extremist professor named John Eidsmoe, a frequent contributor to John Birch Society publications who once opined that he could imagine Jesus carrying an M16 and who spent considerable space in one of his books musing about the feasibility of criminalizing blasphemy. This background is significant considering Bachmann’s leadership role in the Tea Party, a movement ostensibly founded on ideas of limited government. Bachmann says she believes in a limited state, but she was educated in an extremist Christian tradition that rejects the entire notion of a separate, secular legal authority and views earthly law as an instrument for interpreting biblical values. As a legislator, she not only worked to impose a ban on gay marriage, she also endorsed a report that proposed banning anyone who “espoused or supported Shariah law” from immigrating to the U.S. (Bachmann seems so unduly obsessed with Shariah law that, after listening to her frequent pronouncements on the subject, one begins to wonder if her crazed antipathy isn’t born of professional jealousy.) This discrepancy may account for why some Tea Party leaders don’t buy Bachmann as a champion of small government. “Michele Bachmann is — what’s the old-school term? — a poser,” says Chris Littleton, an Ohio Tea Party leader troubled by her support of the Patriot Act and other big-government interventions. “Look at her record and see how ‘Tea Party’ she really is.”… read on It’s a long article, but worth your time to see how she’s been able to make crazy statement after crazy statement and keep moving her political career forward. Even Bill O’Reilly has not taken her seriously either like many of the other GOP grand poobahs, but did say on The Factor that she could be a good VP candidate . Taibbi makes the case early on in his piece that she shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand because she’s managed to keep getting elected. She uses teh crazy very well. You will want to laugh, but don’t, because the secret of Bachmann’s success is that every time you laugh at her, she gets stronger. Don’t miss the story about when she screams in the bathroom or her fear that public education turns children into socialist herds or when her state already had homophobic legislation already passed, but she wanted to pass it a second time. In 2003, after the Massachusetts Supreme Court issued its famous ruling permitting gay marriage, Bachmann proposed an amendment to the Minnesota constitution banning gay marriage — despite the fact that the state legislature had already passed a law making same-sex unions illegal. Even the politicians who were sufficiently gay-phobic to have passed the original anti-­marriage law were floored by the brazen pointlessness of Bachmann’s bill. “It’s unnecessary, it’s redundant, it’s duplicative,” said Assistant Senate Majority Leader Ann Rest. As much as she flip flops around the crazy train, she can never take back the love she showed for George Bush after the SOTU in 2007: After signing the autograph for Bachmann, the president turns away, but Bachmann doesn’t let go. In fact, the video shows her reaching out to get a better grip on him. Bush then leans over to kiss another congresswoman, but Bachmann is still holding on. Bachmann then gets more attention, a kiss and an embrace from the president. A few seconds later, Bachmann’s hand finally comes off the presidential shoulder. Bachmann has quite a thing for Bush, apparently. This press release from her campaigning days reads more like a diary entry for a 12 year old who got to meet her Tiger Beat teen idol: I have never been in the Presidential limousine before so I was a little unsure what to do when the limousine stopped at the custard stand. I wasn’t sure if I should exit with the President or get out of my side of the car. Karl Rove told me I would exit out the door on my side after The President steps out and someone would open the door for me. I could not believe I was discussing what flavor of custard to order with the President of the United States! Digby writes: She doesn’t have the sex appeal that Sarah Palin has, which is probably in her favor. (Social conservatives get over-stimulated and confused around female sexuality.) But she’s attractive and poised and is a professional politician who knows how the game is played. And she’s both ignorant and savvy, accessible and extreme. She’s very creepy. And she’ll play the Conservative victim card as well as anyone ever has. I imagine she may try to top Sarah Palin on that one as we get deeper into the presidential election cycle. Taibbi appeared on the new Countdown and discussed with Keith Olbermann his take on Bachmann (h/t Heather): Click here to view this media

Continue reading …

As we see, regulation is good as long as Republicans like Darrell Issa can use it to bust a union! Of course, this doesn’t really address the insidious idea that a former federal agency is supposed to fund itself. (That same kind of thinking has led to hobbled Amtrak service throughout the country.) It’s not as if everyone doesn’t use the mail — it’s part of the common good. (Yeah, I know. Republicans hate that!) Imagine if we asked the military to fund itself. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) introduced legislation Thursday to restructure the U.S. Postal Service, saying more regulation is necessary to “prevent another taxpayer bailout” of the financially strapped agency. The bill would eliminate Saturday delivery and give the Postal Service greater latitude to close post offices and regional mail processing centers. A panel would be created to oversee the agency, modeled on the District of Columbia’s Financial Control Board, with a broad mandate to reduce costs and bring the agency back to financial solvency. “Congress can’t keep kicking the can down the road on out-of-control labor costs and excess infrastructure of USPS,” Issa said in a statement. The panel also would have authority to renegotiate collective-bargaining agreements with postal workers, a provision that will draw stiff opposition from unions. If the bill becomes law, employees will probably see reductions in their wages and benefits. The plan from the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform would eventually save the Postal Service $6 billion a year. It comes on the heels of the agency’s announcement that it plans to suspend its contributions to the pensions of thousands of workers to help stem billions of dollars in losses. Postal officials said they agree with some provisions in the bill; the agency proposed eliminating Saturday delivery several years ago. But they said Issa wrongly assumes the agency’s path to financial stability lies in more regulation. “The opposite is true,” the agency said in a statement. “Our financial instability is the result of dramatic loss in volumes, coupled with restrictions imposed by Congress that have prevented the Postal Service from adequately responding to those losses in a business-like fashion.”

Continue reading …
When The Going Gets Tough, Cantor Gets Going: Cantor Walks Out Of WH Budget Discussions

Click here to view this media Yup, he’s taking the future of this country so seriously …. Eric Cantor pulled out of the debt ceiling talks this morning, citing unbridgeable differences over the Dem insistence on tax hikes as part of a deal, and in his statement, he called on President Obama to step in and resolve the tax issue: Since early May, Vice President Biden has led meetings surrounding the debt limit. The Vice President deserves a great deal of credit for his leadership in bringing us this far. We have worked to find areas of commonality to meet the goal of identifying spending cuts commensurate with or exceeding the amount of the Obama Administration’s request for a debt limit increase. I believe that we have identified trillions in spending cuts, and to date, we have established a blueprint that could institute the fiscal reforms needed to start getting our fiscal house in order. That said, each side came into these talks with certain orders, and as it stands the Democrats continue to insist that any deal must include tax increases. There is not support in the House for a tax increase, and I don’t believe now is the time to raise taxes in light of our current economic situation. Regardless of the progress that has been made, the tax issue must be resolved before discussions can continue. Given this impasse, I will not be participating in today’s meeting and I believe it is time for the President to speak clearly and resolve the tax issue. Once resolved, we have a blueprint to move forward to trillions of spending cuts and binding mechanisms to change the way things are done around here. What’s interesting here is that by all appearances the main emerging obstacle to compromise was the demand by Senate Dems that a final deal include some kind of economic stimulus measures, such as infrastructure spending or a payroll tax cut. Republicans spent all day yesterday hammering the Dem demand, arguing that more stimulus was at odds with the Biden-led group’s goal of reducing spending. Nobody should be surprised that Cantor and the Republicans have no real interest in coming up with a bi-partisan agreement. And if you think this was some spur-of-the-moment principled stand Cantor was taking instead of a calculated, coordinated move to force more concessions, I have a bridge to sell you… cheap . But the thing that continually annoys me is that their assumption is that if they keep repeating the same tired talking points, Americans are going to support their games: Alan Blinder, a Princeton economics professor and former Fed vice president, thoroughly debunked the GOP’s claims on Tuesday in a Wall Street Journal op-ed titled “The GOP Myth of ‘Job-Killing’ Spending.” Blinder writes: The generic conservative view that government is “too big” in some abstract sense leads to a strong predisposition against spending. OK. But the question remains: How can the government destroy jobs by either hiring people directly or buying things from private companies? For example, how is it that public purchases of computers destroy jobs but private purchases of computers create them? Blinder easily knocks down claims that the 2009 federal stimulus—roughly $600 billion in spending and $200 billion in tax cuts—failed to create jobs, pointing to Congressional Budget Office data that shows the net job gain was at least 1.3 million and perhaps as high as 3.3 million. What’s more, Blinder debunks the idea that the federal deficit and the uncertainty that comes with it has caused companies to scale back business investments, which in turn impacts hiring and economic growth. Except such investment soared in the past year, increasing 14.7 percent. Ultimately, Blinder argues for another round of stimulus—specifically, giving businesses that grow their payrolls a tax credit—while calling for a serious long-term deficit reduction package.

Continue reading …
Senate Democrats Call Out Republicans for Sabotaging Economic Recovery

Click here to view this media All I can say is it’s about time some of the Democrats are calling out Republicans for something that’s been obvious to me for some time, their willingness to wreck the economy for short term political gain. Steve Benen’s been writing about this for some time and wrote about the same press conference Ed Schultz and Jonathan Alter were talking about in the clip above in his post here — The ‘sabotage’ question goes mainstream : In November, I faced all kinds of pushback by raising a provocative argument: is it possible Republicans would pursue policies that would hurt the economy on purpose? Seven months later, it appears the “sabotage” question is going mainstream. E.J. Dionne Jr. inched pretty close to it last week, noting that Republicans “have no interest” in working on job creation because “Republicans benefit if the economy stays sluggish.” Kevin Drum wondered whether this will ever be “a serious talking point,” adding, “No serious person in a position of real influence really wants to accuse an entire party of cynically trying to tank the economy, after all.” That appears to be changing . Republicans are sabotaging economic recovery efforts because it will help them win in 2012, Senate Democratic leaders charged Wednesday. “Unfortunately our Republican colleagues in the House and Senate are driven by putting one man out of work — President Obama,” Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) declared at a Capitol Hill press conference called the day after Senate Republicans blocked an economic development bill that they have backed in the past. Durbin pointed to remarks made by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), in which he said the top goal of Republicans should be to make Obama a one-term President. Durbin added that “their only goal” is to defeat the president, adding, “They believe a weak economy is there best chance of winning the next election.” This isn’t subtle. Durbin is saying that Republicans are deliberately holding back the economy for purely partisan reasons. It’s an explosive charge, and as of today, he’s not the only one making it. The rhetorical shift appears to the result of last night’s vote on the Economic Development Administration, a successful program that provides federal grants to local projects. Republicans have repeatedly said that they believe the EDA is great for economic growth and job creation, but they nevertheless linked arms and killed the bill . This comes after Republicans balked at a payroll tax cut intended to spur hiring, another measure the GOP has traditionally supported — until now. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the number three Democrat in the chamber, told reporters this morning, “If they oppose even something so suited to their tastes ideologically, it shows that they’re just opposing anything that helps create jobs. It almost makes you wonder if they aren’t trying to slow down the economic recovery for political gain.” Yes, almost. Read on… I don’t think there’s any “almost” about it. As Schultz and Alter pointed out in the clip above and as Steve wrote in his article, Republicans are voting against all kinds of proposals to promote job growth that they were formerly on record as supporting and as he noted, McConnell’s on record saying his top priority is not job creation, but making Barack Obama a one term president. Steve asked if it is really outrageous to at least ask if Republicans are trying to destroy the economy for political gain. I think it’s long past time that they are finally being called out for it. There’s no subtlety to what they’re doing. It’s as obvious as the nose on one’s face for anyone that’s been paying attention to their actions and their double speak on what’s needed for economic recovery. Jonathan Alter pointed out that the White House isn’t helping matters any by not laying out a jobs plan of their own and I agree with him. They’ve been allowing Republicans to drive the conversation and buying into their deficit cutting austerity rhetoric instead of pushing back at Republicans who have been relentlessly claiming that the trouble with the economy is the debt and the deficit and that we must pacify the imaginary confidence fairies before corporations quit hording their money and start creating jobs in America. I hope we continue to hear more of this from the Democrats and it’s just a shame it took them this long. Here’s more of their press conference that the Senate Democrats posted on their You Tube page. Now if we could get them to get on message with the need to raise taxes on the rich and not balancing our budget on the backs of the poor and the working class, I might quit being disgusted with everyone in Washington D.C. other than our progressive caucus in the House .

Continue reading …

Iris

No Comment
Iris

Iris äter lunch Ragnarok Online Walking Emperium WoE Phun adjustable iris (Eye) lisztj says: Sabi sa IRIS app (WAB) daw un bus! Ask @Shashieme ano WAB? – What a bus!!! Deymmm!

Continue reading …
Son’s Death Prompts Action From Dad on Amoebas

Jeremy Lewis would rather talk about the good times he had with his son. Instead he spends much of his time talking about his son’s death, hoping to prevent it from happening to others. (June 23)

Continue reading …
Son’s Death Prompts Action From Dad on Amoebas

Jeremy Lewis would rather talk about the good times he had with his son. Instead he spends much of his time talking about his son’s death, hoping to prevent it from happening to others. (June 23)

Continue reading …
Boehner ‘Cautiously Optimistic’ Over Withdrawal

Speaker of the House John Boehner says the military’s success in Afghanistan remains tenuous and is urging the president not to withdraw troops on a political deadline but rather based on conditions on the ground. (June 23)

Continue reading …
Boehner ‘Cautiously Optimistic’ Over Withdrawal

Speaker of the House John Boehner says the military’s success in Afghanistan remains tenuous and is urging the president not to withdraw troops on a political deadline but rather based on conditions on the ground. (June 23)

Continue reading …