Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 80)
CNN’s Cooper, Borger Rhapsodize On ‘Adult’ Obama Who ‘Did Not Raise Taxes’

CNN's Anderson Cooper and Gloria Borger took turns casting President Barack Obama as the centrist 'adult' in a room teeming with unruly Republican children who would rather invite economic calamity than compromise on a debt-reduction plan. Discussing a topic that would have made a perfect “Keeping Them Honest” segment, Cooper insisted, incorrectly, on Monday's “AC 360″ that the Democratic president has never raised taxes since taking office in 2009: “Now, in fact the stimulus was about one-third tax cuts. So in fairness, he did not raise taxes. He and Congress later passing a payroll tax holiday that is in effect right now. A year later he and Congress did approve tax breaks to help employers hire more people.” According to Politifact, Cooper is way off base in claiming the president “did not raise taxes.” In February, the fact-checking website gave Obama's claim that “I didn't raise taxes once” a “false” rating. Citing tax hikes on cigarettes, indoor tanning, and Medicare for families that make more than $250,000 per year, Politifact asserted, “The idea that Obama did not raise taxes is just plain wrong.” Cooper had the opportunity to fact check Obama himself in his “Keeping Them Honest” segment that aired only moments earlier, but the CNN anchor decided instead to focus on a pledge signed by Republican presidential candidates Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum. After Cooper implied Obama is a moderate, Borger attempted to erase any doubt: “The president was offering [Republicans], you know, a very, very good deal here.” CNN's senior political analyst later marveled at Obama's centrist leadership: “Right now, I think the Republicans are kind of up against the wall here because the president looks like the adult. He's put something on the table.” Unfortunately for Borger, the president didn't produce a detailed plan: he gave a speech at a press conference. And as CBO Director Dough Elmendorf pointed out, the Congressional Budget Office doesn't estimate speeches . Unlike Obama, who hasn't put much of anything on the table – at least nothing the CBO can score – House and Senate Republicans have put forward a number of cost-saving measures in their plan to ” cut, cap, and balance .” House Speaker John Boehner said as much during his rebuttal press conference on Monday: The American people will not accept, and the House cannot pass, a bill that raises taxes on job creators. The House can only pass a debt limit bill that includes spending cuts larger than the hike in the debt limit as well as real restraints on future spending. My colleagues and I feel we should enact a balanced budget amendment to keep the federal government from spending us into the same situation again. I think we also need real reductions in spending right now and spending caps to ensure that progress we make is not undone in the future… A bill that doesn’t meet these tests can’t pass the House of Representatives. ( H/T RedState ) Borger can claim the GOP is “up against the wall,” but it was the Obama administration that called for a “clean” vote on raising the debt ceiling without cutting spending. Since then, the debate has shifted from whether Congress will cut spending to how much and how soon. Yet Borger still maintains the pragmatic president has outmaneuvered the recalcitrant Republicans. A transcript of the segment can be found below: CNN AC 360 July 11, 2011 10:14 p.m. ET ANDERSON COOPER: “Raw Politics” tonight: just 22 bargaining days until the U.S. Treasury runs out of money to pay the bills, throwing the country into default and the economy into a greater crisis. President Obama and congressional leaders met for a second straight day trying to hammer out a deficit-reduction deal. Republicans have said without such a deal they won't allow vote to allow more borrowing to raise the debt ceiling. Now, bear in mind lawmakers have always griped, but they've have never failed to do that ever. They will talk again tomorrow. Today, the President called for action. BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States: I have been hearing from my Republican friends for quite some time that it is a moral imperative for us to tackle our debt and our deficits in a serious way. I have been hearing from them that this is one of the things that's creating uncertainty and holding back investment on the part of the business community. And so, what I have said to them is, “Let's go.” COOPER: Unclear though whether he can deliver the left wing of his own party. Unclear also whether the Tea Party Republicans will sign on to any deal with any revenue increasers beyond selling government property and other fairly minor measures. House Speaker Boehner, who seemed receptive to a grand compromise which might have included tax concessions from Republicans in exchange for cost savings in Medicare and Social Security from the White House, backed away on Saturday. Today he said, no tax increases or no deal. Rep. JOHN BOEHNER, Speaker of the House: The American people will not accept and the House cannot pass a bill that raises taxes on job creators. Now, the House can only pass a debt limit bill that includes spending cuts larger than the hike in the debt limit as well as real restraints on future spending. COOPER: His colleague Majority Leader Eric Cantor standing firm too, holding up a quote from President Obama back in 2009 about not raising taxes during a recession. Now, here's what the President said back then in 2009 to NBC's Chuck Todd in response to a voter's question. OBAMA: First of all, he's right. Normally, you don't raise taxes in a recession, which is why we haven't and why we have instead cut taxes. So I guess what I would say to Scott is, his economics are right. You don't raise taxes in a recession. We haven't raised taxes in a recession. COOPER: Now, in fact the stimulus was about one-third tax cuts. So in fairness, he did not raise taxes. He and Congress later passing a payroll tax holiday that is in effect right now. A year later he and Congress did approve tax breaks to help employers hire more people. Now, you can decide for yourself whether that's a tax cut or the kind of wasteful spending through the tax code the president says he's now against when it comes to corporate jets. In any case, here's how Mr. Obama today reconciled that 2009 statement with his current position on taxes. OBAMA: I want to be crystal clear: nobody has talked about increasing taxes now. Nobody has talked about increases – increasing taxes next year. We're talking about potentially 2013 and the out years. COOPER: The question is what will the economy look like then? The answer to that depends heavily on what happens now. Here to talk about it is chief political analyst Gloria Borger and David Walker, former head of the Government Accountability Office. Currently he's president and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative. David, is there any case to be made for not raising the debt ceiling? DAVID WALKER, former United States comptroller general: No, there really isn't. We have to raise the debt ceiling because the fact is we don't know what the markets would do, what would to happen to the stock markets, what would to happen to the interest rates. And for every one percent or 100 basis point increase in interest rates, it's $150 billion a year on our total debt. COOPER: So how do you see the debate that is happening now? I mean what's your take on it? WALKER: Well, both sides have agreed that they're going to raise the debt ceiling limit, but it looks like it's going to be a smaller deal rather than a bigger deal because the Republicans don't want to do anything that could even be called remotely a tax increase. I think after the 2012 elections, we're going to get comprehensive tax reform that will broaden the base, lower rates and generate more revenues, among other things, along with starting to deal with entitlement reforms. But I think right now, we're going to get a smaller deal and kick the can down the road with regard to the tough stuff. COOPER: Gloria, politically, is that what it seems like, a smaller deal? GLORIA BORGER, CNN senior political analyst: Yes, it does, Anderson. And I think if you sort of step back for a moment and take a look at this it seems to me really to be a defining moment for the Republican Party here. The base of this party is conservative and it's anti-tax. And you had the House speaker, a Republican, the president of the United States, sitting down and believing that they could try to cut a huge deal that would actually go a long way towards solving the deficit problem. But John Boehner, the Speaker, took that back to his conservative Republicans in the House, which I believe represent the base of the party, and they said, absolutely no way, because 230 of those Republicans in the House have taken a no-tax pledge, no-new-tax pledges and they're going to stick by it. And I think things may change after the next election, but as for now, the Republican Party is stuck and they can't even accept a good deal. The president was offering them, you know, a very, very good deal here. You know, $3 in spending cuts for every dollar of tax increases. WALKER: Well, John Boehner is correct that the base of the Republican Party will not support any type of tax increases, even if it's eliminating tax expenditures where there can be a bipartisan agreement. He's wrong to say the American people won't. He's just wrong. And right now the President has got the high ground because he's basically saying, let's go for a long-term deal. I will put Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security on the table. All you need to do is to put tax expenditures on the table. By the way, we have the lowest revenues as a percentage of GDP in decades. It's less than 16 percent. Nonetheless, we are where we are and I think both parties are going to have to go to the electorate in 2012. COOPER: But can you get a compromise without some sort of tax-increasing revenues somehow? WALKER: I can come up – I can come up with $2 trillion to $3 trillion worth of deficit reduction without any tax increases, ok? BORGER: You know, Anderson, I was talking to a senior White House adviser today, for example, who suggested that perhaps they could get a deal, a smaller deal of closing some of these tax loopholes and extending the payroll tax holiday for a certain period of time, so there would be no net tax increase. So a little bit of trickery, but maybe they could do it that way. COOPER: Just politically, Gloria, how does this play out, do you think? I mean, obviously we have this presidential election coming up. David is saying Obama seems like he's perceived as taking the high ground. BORGER: He does. COOPER: Clearly he's interested in getting independents on board. BORGER: Right. COOPER: He's lost a lot of independent support over the years. How does this play for both sides? BORGER: Well, I think the President as you point out is clearly talking to independent voters. Independent voters care about the deficit and they also want Washington to work together, which is what we heard the President talk about an awful lot today in his press conference. It kind of reminded me a little bit of Bill Clinton there. In the end, I think they all know they have to get something done or they will all suffer. Right now, I think the Republicans are kind of up against the wall here because the president looks like the adult. He's put something on the table. I'm not sure that he have could have sold it to his own party, but he put it on the table. So it's up to the Republicans now to come back and he told them today to go home, do your homework and tell me how we're going to make up the rest of this money we have got to raise without – without those revenues. So they're on the spot. COOPER: Do you think this goes – do you think this goes to August 2nd or do you think this is going to be done sooner, David? WALKER: Well, I think they can do it before August 2nd. I mean, you know, it depends upon how big a deal they're trying to do. You have to turn this into legislative language and frankly you have to sell it to the caucuses. I mean they're not going to take a fait accompli deal. And that's one of the reasons why Congress has to stay in session until a deal is done and until there's agreement. BORGER: And complicating all of this, Anderson, is the fact that you've got Republican presidential candidates out there saying don't raise the debt limit. Tim Pawlenty said he was hoping and praying that they would vote against raising the debt limit. So that plays into the Republican congressional discussions as well. COOPER: Never easy to work out this stuff in the midst of an election year? WALKER: You have to work it out. The stakes are too high. Quite frankly anybody who says – I don't care who they are – who says they will vote against the debt ceiling increase irrespective of the deal is irresponsible. COOPER: David Walker, I appreciate it. It's always good to have you on. Gloria Borger as well. Thank you very much. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …
Al Sharpton Knocks Down Rep. Tom Graves ‘Tea Party’ Talking Points

Click here to view this media Cenk Uygur had better not stay on vacation for too much longer or he might find his job in jeopardy from the Rev. Al Sharpton who’s been filling in for him for the last week or so. Sharpton has shown himself to be more than willing to go head to head with these right-wing conservative House members over the last week and this Monday’s interview with Rep. Tom Graves (R-GA) and self proclaimed astroturf “tea party” member was no exception. I wish more people would give these people the same treatment every time they came on the air and maybe they’d decide doing television interviews wasn’t such a good idea any more, but I don’t have any hope of that happening any time soon. Sharpton started out with hitting him for his uber-patriotic nonsense of claiming to “love America” and asking him if he also loved actual Americans like seniors on Social Security and working people who need Medicaid. Sharpton summed that up nicely when he said to Graves “I appreciate you loving America, but do you love Americans that have to survive in America?” Graves comeback to that was to say that Sharpton had probably never been to a tea party rally, but a lot of them are on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and pretended that their policies are actually going to preserve our social safety nets rather than destroy them and that their new slogan of “cut, cap and balance” was just common sense that most Americans should agree with. Sharpton countered Graves by showing him some of what’s posted on his own web site where he says no way in hell should the Republicans be compromising with President Obama on anything. You know, when we hear the word “compromise” on Capitol Hill, that’s what got us into this mess over the last several decades, and it’s been Republican and Democrat. This is no time to compromise. After Graves responded that Republicans should not be compromising, Sharpton asked him why he thought most seniors in the “tea party” who are on Social Security would object to things like taking away the tax breaks for those with corporate jets. Graves tried to change the subject to President Obama, which Sharpton stopped him cold on and brought the conversation right back to him defending tax cuts for the rich. Graves countered by saying he was one of the few Republicans who voted against corporate loopholes that Sharpton was addressing and Sharpton asked him if he really was against those things, why doesn’t he ask his party to agree to include them in the debt ceiling talks going on right now. Graves retreated to asking Sharpton if he’d be in support of Republicans and their ridiculous balanced budget amendment and Sharpton put that right back in his face with former Reagan advisor Bruce Bartlett’s statement on the subject , and I’ll add, they left the last line out in the interview but I’m going to include it here. In short, this is quite possibly the stupidest constitutional amendment I think I have ever seen. It looks like it was drafted by a couple of interns on the back of a napkin. Every senator cosponsoring this POS should be ashamed of themselves. Graves tried to turn it around to President Obama again saying “so Barack Obama is following the advice of the Reagan administration now? Is that what you’re telling me?” Sharpton again didn’t let him get away with trying to deflect the conversation away from himself and onto the Obama administration, and told him no, this is what Al Sharpton is asking you. After that Graves was forced to admit that yes, he supports the amendment. Sharpton wrapped it up with driving home the fact that Graves claims he’s for cutting corporate welfare, but doesn’t support it being part of these debt ceiling negotiations and pinned him down on his doublespeak. In the end all he could resort to is to claim that going after those loopholes really isn’t going to make a dent in the budget, so naturally they should just be ignored right now. Sharpton then showed him a graph of just how much money in the budget would be saved if the Bush tax cuts were allowed to expire and here’s how the segment wound up. SHARPTON: The bigger issue is, well I can show you (crosstalk) if you let the Buch tax cuts expire now, you have a huge amount of money to work with. But again, it’s not what you say, and there’s the graph right there, $424 billion you cut into if you let the tax cuts just expire. But Congressman, what I’m saying is, is I’m a preacher. GRAVES: You’re a preacher. SHARPTON: I know the difference between talking the talk, walking the walk. You claim you voted for it, but you don’t want to walk with it. Because you have an opportunity right now, on national T.V. to say to your party and to your Speaker, put it on the table! I voted against it. That’s what I’m telling everybody. GRAVES: I want on the table and what I’ve made clear is, cut the deficit now, cap the spending and balance the budget. That’s the answer to the deficit crisis and the debt crisis we have in this nation. And if we’re to preserve America and our future, it’s going to take big, bold proposals. That is big. Compromise and deals, that is not big. (crosstalk) SHARPTON: And also we cannot ever talk about dealing with the rich and the corporate jets, but grandma and working people, you, are, expendable. GRAVES: As long as you are on the air, there will be a lot of talk about it. SHARPTON: Thank you for your time this evening. GRAVES: Thank you Al. I don’t think we’re going to see Graves come on the air with Sharpton any time again soon and I’ll just echo his words, thank you Al.

Continue reading …
ABC’s Karl Admits Dems Oppose Medicare Reform So They Can Run Against Medicare Cuts
Continue reading …
Hamid Karzai’s brother assassinated in southern Afghanistan

Ahmed Wali Karzai, who was killed at home by a security guard, was accused of being a key figure in the illegal opium trade Ahmad Wali Karzai, the powerful half brother of the Afghan president, Hamid Kazai, has been killed by one of his security guards inside his own house in Kandahar, according to the local chief of border police. “Ahmed Wali Karzai was killed at about 11.30am. He was killed by his bodyguard inside his house,” said General Abdul Razaq. Razaq said an investigation into the assassination was under way. A tribal elder in Kandahar province also confirmed the death of Ahmad Wali Karzai. Haji Padsha, an elder of the Alikozai tribe, said that Ahmad Wali Karzai had been shot on his return from a meeting with foreigners at the former house of Mullah Mohammed Omar, the fugitive leader of the Afghan Taliban. Ahmad Wali Karzai had come under criticism in the past from local Afghans for renting the property to international officials. Ahmad Wali Karzai was a powerful figure in Afghan politics and said to be a key figure in the illegal Afghan opium trade. He was also reported to be on the payroll of the CIA. He denied both allegations. He said that international forces used these charges to deflect their own failings in Afghanistan. Ahmad Wali Karzai was the head of the provincial council in Kandahar, Afghanistan’s second biggest city, and had been the target of previous assassination attempts. In 2009, four suicide bombers stormed the provincial council office in Kandahar, killing 13 people. Ahmad Wali Karzai claimed he was the target of the attack. The Government Media and Information Centre in Kandahar sent out a message via Twitter confirming the death of Ahmad Wali Karzai. Hamid Karzai Afghanistan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Major Garrett Tells Chris Matthews Why GOP Can’t Vote For Tax Hikes

As much as liberal media members pushing for tax hikes don't understand the fiscal and economic reasons for not doing so, they've been deceitfully ignoring the political ramifications for Republicans caving on this issue. On Monday's “Hardball,” National Journal's Major Garrett explained to Chris Matthews that if the President didn't raise taxes high enough for his liking when the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress for two years, it's absurd to expect the GOP to do it for him now (video follows with transcript and commentary): MAJOR GARRETT, NATIONAL JOURNAL: Boehner and McConnell don't want to default, okay. They’ve said so publicly. They're in negotiations to avoid a default… CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Right. GARRETT: … and they’re going to try to drive the hardest bargain. What they're telling the President is, “Look at the political realities: you didn't raise taxes in a lame duck session when you had 59 Democrats in the Senate and almost 260 in the House. Don't expect Republicans to raise taxes we own the House of Representatives and have six more it Senate seats. MATTHEWS: Yeah. GARRETT: Operationally, as a matter of politics, that doesn't work. Exactly. Obama had two years of complete legislative control of this country – including months of a filibuster-proof Senate – to get whatever tax increases he wanted on the books. Now that the Republicans control the House, and have a stronger position in the Senate, it's politically untenable for them to go along with any tax hikes no matter how small, especially coming so soon after their victory in the midterms and with another major election less than seventeen months away. Doing so would be political suicide, and could result in a repeat of the shellacking Republicans took after President George H.W. Bush went back on his “Read My Lips – No New Taxes” pledge. Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh on Monday said this is likely Obama's strategy: John Boehner is Obama's lifeline to reelection. That's all Boehner is to Obama, nothing else. He not a golf buddy. He's nothing other than that. If he can get Boehner to ultimately cave, Obama's reelected. That's what he knows…He sees, “If I can force this guy to cave, I don't care what the House vote is. I don't care if I lose the vote. If I can get this guy to cave and put my tax increase for a vote, even if it loses, I win. And I get reelected.” That's what Obama thinks, because if Boehner caves, it's bye-bye GOP. That's the thing that everybody must understand. If Boehner caves, it's bye-bye GOP and nothing to do with the policy changes that might happen. If Boehner caves and takes a tax increase, folks, to the House and it loses, Obama still wins because the Republican base is so ticked off at that. Exactly. What Obama and his media minions are trying to do is create a repeat of 1990 when the Democrats and their press surrogates hammered Bush 41 until he finally agreed to raise taxes against his campaign pledge. Despite the media supporting this move at the time, they were all over him once the 1992 presidential campaign began, and assisted in fomenting conservative as well as moderate anger that led so many to vote for Ross Perot it gave Bill Clinton the victory with far less than 50 percent of the votes. Those that have been paying attention know that the press have been ridiculing Bush for this disastrous flip-flop ever since. Now, almost 20 years later, the Democrats and the press are trying to do the exact same thing claiming that the world is going to end if taxes aren't raised hoping to force Boehner and Company to cave. Once that happens, after initially congratulating the GOP for being willing to compromise for the sake of the nation, they'll attack every Republican during next year's campaign season – including Boehner – for their flip-flop hoping that they will not only get their beloved Obama re-elected but also give the House back to the Democrats. With this in mind, Garrett and Limbaugh are 100 percent right: if the Republicans want to be successful at the polls next November, they can't cave on this tax issue no matter what pressure they get from media members to do so. Intelligent people are supposed to learn from history not repeat it.

Continue reading …
Rep. Jim Jordan Thinks Default Would be Acceptable, But Doesn’t Want to Call it Default

Click here to view this media From C-SPAN’s Newsmakers, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) thinks it would be perfectly acceptable to go past the hard deadline Treasury Sec. Tim Geithner gave the Congress for the absolute last date that the debt ceiling can be raised and if that means that we don’t pay part of our obligations, oh well, so be it. Grandma and grandpa have their Social Security checks stopped, that would be too bad, but it’s more important that we gut the government and take care of this manufactured crisis that we never worried about before a Democrat got elected president. This is unbelievably irresponsible and dangerous talk coming from yet another member of our United States Congress. Apparently we’ve got House members contemplating just how long they can drag this thing out since he admits that they were looking at what the date would be that Social Security checks don’t go out any more. After being reminded that even John Boehner “thought it could have disastrous economic consequences if this went past August 2nd”, Jordan shrugs it off and pretends that not getting the deficit reductions they’re demanding would somehow be worse than running either into or past the hard deadline Geithner gave for default. He also dismisses like a lot of them have whether August 2nd is the drop dead date or not, but admits that it would be some time in August even if it’s not exactly the 2nd. I’ll honestly be surprised if we don’t start seeing the bond markets reacting if they don’t get an agreement made within the next day or two and this clown thinks we could keep this game of chicken going for another few weeks. LERER: Do you think the country would default, that we would go into default if we pass this August 2nd? JORDAN: Remember, there’s a difference between default and not having enough money to meet all obligations that we’ve appropriated for, or passed in law to spend dollars on. On August 2nd there’s still going to be revenue coming into the Treasury. So, you know, would it possibly require Tim Geithner to make decisions about who gets paid first? Yeah. And, you know, I’d like to think the administration would say, well, obviously a default means you don’t pay the bond holders, so you’ve got to pay the bond holders first. And the bond holders are, I assume all of you have some kind of 401K invested in… all Americans have some kind of investment. LERER: And the Chinese… JORDAN: A host of folks own bonds. BRAWNER: So they would get paid first? JORDAN: Local governments have all kinds of, you know, municipal governments, county governments have all kinds, so meet bond obligations first, then you start going down, Social Security, our troops and you start making sure they get paid first, but, at some point, it may mean, folks who work in the federal government here in Washington, bureaucrats in Washington who work here, government employees, may have to wait a while to get paid. BRAWNER: Congressman, as you probably know, Social Security payments are made on the third of every month. JORDAN: Umm hmm. BRAWNER: The bipartisan policy center did an analysis of August 3rd, what happens if the debt ceiling isn’t raised. We have an income of $12 billion revenue coming in. We have $32 billion in committed spending on August 3rd. $23 billion of that is Social Security payments. JORDAN: Right. BRAWNER: And that assumes you pay, as you said, the bond holders first. How are you going to explain to a constituent that a bond holder got paid first, but they didn’t get their Social Security payment? JORDAN: Look, there’s… I understand we’ve got Social Security payments, and there’s another date, some of this played out I think on the fifteenth of the month, I forget what day it is exactly, where there’s another big obligation and the day they actually roll over the bonds and sell them each month. And I maybe have the wrong date. We have to see exactly when that is, but remember revenue is coming in. Decisions have to be made. And also, never forget the big problem. The big problem is the $14 trillion debt and the crisis that’s coming. So would that be tough? Sure. But I would rather have that difficult situation in there vs. the really big problem, which everybody knows is coming. So we have to try to get the plan in place that’s going to fix it long term. And again I keep coming back to it, but it’s, we think our plan, cut cap and balance is going to be the right approach STANTON: Do you think your leadership has the will to sort of face down that sort of a reality? JORDAN: I think it’s that important to the country and I do. I really do. Remember this too. While I understand August 2nd and what happens with Social Security payments remember Tim, remember the history here. Tim Geithner originally told us, he sent a letter to Congress back in I think January saying, of we’ve got to have this done by the first quarter. Then he said, no, we’ve got to have it done by May 16th. And now he’s saying August 2nd. So you’ve got to keep it in context too, of what the Treasury has told us for the last year. Now they’re saying, oh August 2nd is the hard date. There is obviously a hard date out there, but there is some flexibility in how this can work. And the idea that we’re going to default, is not an accurate use of the word. Um, there are more obligations than we’re going to have revenue for at some point in August eventually. LERER: Speaker Boehner on Friday said that he thought it could have disastrous economic consequences if this went past August 2nd. If he wrong too? JORDAN: Look, I said earlier, the ideal situation is to avoid any concerns in early or late August and avoid the big problems coming. But the big problem that’s coming is the most important. And that’s what the American people understand. So, um, we want to try to avoid both. And the way to do that is to put in place a plan that’s going to address both situations. Something… if we can get a good plan before August 2nd, I’m all for that. But if we have to past it to get the kind of plan that fixes the big problem, that’s what we need to do.

Continue reading …

Time To Act

No Comment

With the jobs picture bleak and getting steadily bleaker, President Obama needs to shed the tightly restrained list of options that the D.C. establishment considers it acceptable to consider. The things Republicans want to consider would be laughable if they weren’t so awful: more (and more and more and more) tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 percent and biggest corporations already awash in money they aren’t using to create jobs. The list of things establishment D.C. Democrats want to consider range from the good but politically impossible (like more fiscal stimulus) to the good but really small (such as tinkering here and there with small targeted tax credit ideas) to bad ideas taken from Republicans and modified to make them slightly less extreme. But there are ideas outside of this very narrow range of conventional wisdom in Washington that the Obama administration, along with key big states with Democratic Governors and legislatures, could do right now that could boost the economy significantly. Here are four big ideas that would make an immediate difference in pumping up the economy, things the Obama administration could do without going through Congress: 1. Use TARP. The economic crisis that spurred the creation of TARP may have stabilized, but it sure hasn’t ended. And TARP is still open for business: while most of the no-strings-attached big bank bailout money has been returned, TARP still is authorized to spend $475 billion. Since the big banks are hoarding their money and using it to give huge bonuses to their execs, why not turn the TARP money into a modern day Reconstruction Finance Corporation (the agency that FDR used to help lift us out of the Great Depression), and start lending TARP money out to small business entrepreneurs who actually planned to create jobs. This might also provide some competitive spur to the banks who are just sitting on their money. TARP is unpopular, and Republicans might score some short-term political points screaming about the money being used for this, but I think Obama would win the fight by saying that rather than investing in the big banks, it’s time to invest in small businesses that are actually going to use the money to create real jobs. 2. Fannie and Freddie. The Obama administration has virtually unlimited authority in bailing out Fannie and Freddie. The government runs Fannie and Freddie. And right now, Fannie and Freddie are acting as badly as any other big bank in foreclosing on homes and driving down housing prices for their own short-term gain. It is time to take advantage of actually being in charge of these two huge financial institutions, and run them in a way that keeps more people in their homes through mortgage writedowns and stabilizes the housing market as a result. This would do as much to stimulate the economy as any other thing that could be done right now. 3. Ratchet up pressure on Wall Street to write down mortgages. The Federal government does not run the six big banks that dominate our financial sector like they do Fannie and Freddie, but as they proved beyond a shadow of a doubt during the 2008-9 financial panic, they have the regulatory power to do whatever is needed in a crisis — and that is certainly what this kind of economy feels like to most Americans. This week, Treasury actually showed again that they do have that kind of muscle in writing a rule that will force banks to help unemployed homeowners trying to hang on to their homes. It was the best thing Treasury has done in a long time, and long overdue. Now they just need to take the idea further, and keep squeezing the banks to write down underwater mortgages of homeowners who still have jobs but are hanging on by a thread because the value of their house collapsed. By getting Fannie, Freddie, and the six biggest banks to writedown all of the underwater mortgages in the country, you would inject hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy because middle-income homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments go down. Plus you stabilize the entire housing market, giving homeowners more confidence and financial security, and allowing them more operating room to make other purchases and maybe even start new businesses. 4. Finally do something about Chinese currency manipulation. If the United States were to declare the Chinese in violation of fair trade rules under WTO because of currency manipulation, they could immediately impose tariffs against Chinese goods and provide an immediate and dramatic boost to America’s long ailing manufacturing sector, generating tons of good paying jobs very quickly. This isn’t protectionism, it is actually the exact opposite: demanding China operate under the trade rules every other country on Earth is expected to. And ironically, this wouldn’t generate much political heat, as big majorities in both Houses of Congress already are on record supporting this action. These four things, all of which could be done without having to go though Congress, would all provide immediate jolts to the Main Street economy, put money into the pockets of the hard pressed middle class, and create a lot of jobs quickly. They would show middle-class voters that the President was decisively and dramatically on their side. And who knows: they might even help compensate for all the damage that will done to the economy by the contractionary budget cuts in whatever bad deal the President finally agrees to in order to get the debt ceiling increased — because the only question isn’t whether this budget cutting deal will be bad, but just how bad will it be. The issue is that President Obama will have to go beyond the confines of the conventional wisdom economic advisers that dominate the halls of power in D.C., he will have to pick a big fight with Republicans, and he will have to make Wall Street very unhappy, because all four of these policy initiatives will make them mad. But he has to be bold to save this economy, and his own re-election chances. It is time to act.

Continue reading …
Kevin McCarthy and the GOP’s Three Big Lies

Click here to view this media Not that you need confirmation of the Republicans’ bad faith in the current ‘negotiation’ or anything, but Kevin McCarthy’s disingenuous performance on State of the Union with Candy Crowley yesterday puts it all into perspective. I’m not sure what it’s going to take to get people to shake their collective fists at Republicans, but at some point we need to start flooding them with protest letters over their conduct. Here are McCarthy’s big lies, told in the span of about 10 minutes. Big Lie #1: House Republicans have passed 9 bills that would create 500,000 jobs Please, don’t spit coffee on your monitor/phone/ipad/device at that claim. I’m not sure what bills Republicans have passed that don’t kill jobs, but here’s what the man said: So from the premise that where Republicans have been in the short time they have been in the majority, we’ve laid out a framework to put us on a new path. Energy policy reform, where we spend the money and create jobs here. We’ve passed nine bills that would create more than half a million jobs that have been lingering in the Senate. So I don’t think the premise of where we have been has always been out in front. There are not enough — there are no votes on the Republican side. But even when the Democrats… I went looking for the bills and I found this little bit of propaganda put out by John Boehner’s office. Here are some of the bills they claim are stalled: HR 1229, 1230 and 1231, overriding the President’s moratorium on offshore drilling and expanding the scope and area allowed for offshore exploration. As part of those bills, offshore drilling would be expanded off the coast of Virginia, Florida and California. But of course, domestic oil production isn’t really a job creator. In fact, our domestic oil production is higher than it’s ever been. It is, however, a Koch Industries priority profit item. Paul Ryan’s budget plan For debunkery on this one, let’s turn to John McCain’s economic adviser, Mark Zandi, via our own Jon Perr : For his part, Moody’s Mark Zandi concluded that the Ryan budget’s draconian spending cuts supported by 235 House Republicans and 40 GOP Senators would make the job creation picture much, much worse. While acknowledging that “Congressman Ryan’s budget plan is too heavy on near-term spending cuts, while President Obama’s is too light on long-term deficit reduction,” Zandi nevertheless warned that the Boehner party would lead the U.S. to a staggering loss of 1.7 million jobs over the next two years: In the Ryan plan, lower future deficits and debt result immediately in lower interest rates than under the president’s plan. Ten-year Treasury yields are more than 60 basis points lower in 2012 and more than a percentage point lower by 2014. Yet this is not enough to offset the negative near-term economic consequences of the Ryan plan’s more aggressive spending cuts. Real GDP in 2012 under the Ryan plan is $123 billion lower than in the president’s plan and there are 900,000 fewer payroll jobs in the U.S. By 2014, real GDP is almost $200 billion lower and there are 1.7 million fewer jobs under the Ryan approach than is the case under the president’s. Not seeing that 500,000 jobs yet. Still looking. Moving on to the next point…. Repealing Dodd-Frank Act , on the pretense that it kills jobs for “small business.” McCarthy to Crowley: Economists will tell you if you raise taxes on small businesses, which are not growing right now, you only harm the economy more. So let’s end the uncertainty. To be clear here, we are not talking about small businesses like Mom and Pop’s Ice Cream Parlor down on Main Street. We are talking about small businesses like Koch Industries, a privately-owned company owned by a holding company, which is a Subchapter S corporation. Heather has more on that particular lie here. But again, repealing Dodd-Frank does not create jobs, no matter how long Wall Street and the financial sector hold their breath and stomp their feet. And that’s really all they’ve done. They’ve repealed a whole bunch of legislation that kills more jobs, passed a whole bunch of legislation that kills our environment, jobs and endangers the planet along with the economy, and of course, declared war on women with repeated passage of anti-woman, anti-abortion, anti-family, anti-health bills. Still not seeing that 500,000 jobs, so let’s move on to his next lie. Big Lie #2: Discretionary spending increased 73% in the last 3 years This one won’t take long to debunk. Paul Krugman: The number comes from taking nondefense discretionary spending as reported — which rose 26 percent from 2008 to 2010 (Table 8.7) — and then adding the entire discretionary spending part of the stimulus. Politifact says that this is misleading because not all of the stimulus funds were spent in 2010. But it’s much worse than that: stimulus spending is already in those discretionary spending numbers. If you look at the table, you’ll see bulges in spending on education and ground transportation that go away after 2011; that’s the stimulus. So this GOP talking point is a complete fraud; it’s based on counting the same spending several times over. Politifact concurs, rating this claim false . Big Lie #3: Tax Cuts Stimulated the Economy McCarthy: CROWLEY: Well, you take all the blame. But the thing is, there just seems to me that there has to be some willingness to give, and I have not heard anything from you about, yes, you know what, I would go — if we could get a deal that would cut 2.5 trillion in savings, I would agree to this on the revenue side. There’s nothing on the revenue side you will agree to? MCCARTHY: Well, you know, Candy, I’ve never found one tax increase that created a job. I have watched our economy sputter downward. I’ve been out across the American public, they want to go back to work. And I know those policies will fail. So in principle, no, we’re not going to go there. Now, I’m no brain surgeon but I can read a calendar. And what my calendar says over and over again is this: When tax rates were higher (1993-2000), there were more jobs, not less. The failed policies McCarthy refers to are the policies that cut taxes on the wealthy, wiped out a surplus, and set this country on a path to fiscal disaster. I don’t think I need to produce the charts again, because we’re all living it. Which leads to the biggest lie of all, blending all three in to one neat package: We are losing our jobs because we are spending too much. No. We are losing our jobs because there is no incentive for anyone to let go of their cash, spend it or make investments in the future, from Fortune 500 public companies to private “small businesses” like Koch Industries. On the Fortune 500 side, there’s no pain to simply keeping funds invested and receiving dividends, since that income is tax-privileged for high earners. On the high-end S-Corporation side, there is absolutely no incentive to spend money on anything when they can keep it by simply paying taxes at today’s too low rates. So repeat after me: We don’t have a spending problem; we have a revenue problem. Lather, rinse, repeat, preach. Then go read Steve Benen’s post, because we actually have another problem: Republicans are shirking their sworn duty. All of this could go away in a heartbeat. Republicans could do, today, exactly what they did repeatedly during the Bush years: simply vote to raise the debt ceiling in a clean bill and move on. The entire process could take literally a few minutes. But GOP officials don’t want to. They want to play a game in which the entire world could lose. How is this not the biggest political scandal in modern American history? How is it that those who claim the high ground on patriotism could put our financial well being on the line, on purpose, when they don’t have to?

Continue reading …
Mass Burial As Bosnia Marks Massacre Anniversary

40000 gathered in Srebrenica Monday, as Bosnia reburied 613 victims on the 16th anniversary of the massacre in the town. (July 11)

Continue reading …
Boehner: House Won’t Back Deal With Tax Hike

Speaker John Boehner said Monday that he agrees with President Barack Obama that the nation’s borrowing limit must be raised to avoid a government default but insists that House Republicans won’t back any deal with tax increases. (July 11)

Continue reading …