Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 44)
England riots: pressure to scrap police cuts as Birmingham mourns its dead

• Tensions high in wake of killing of three men • Family say they were guarding car wash from looters • Father asks: why do we have to kill each other? David Cameron is facing growing cabinet pressure to rethink the coalition’s policing cuts in the wake of the deaths of three young Birmingham men, who were hit by a car during violent disturbances in the city. As the Police Federation warned of a “catastrophe” if similar riots erupted after the cuts were introduced, a senior government source said the Home Office would be advised to take a fresh look at its plans to cut £2bn from police funding over the next few years. “The optics have changed,” the source told the Guardian. Cameron insisted that the cuts would not lead to a “reduction in visible policing”. He is expected to announce some emergency funding when he addresses the Commons on Thursday, to cover the extra costs of policing this week’s riots, as well as the possibility of insurance claims against police on the grounds they provided no protection to businesses in a riot. But there are fears in Whitehall that the Home Office plan to make savings in the police service could leave an “exposed flank” in any future riots. The London mayor Boris Johnson warned that the case for cuts was “pretty frail” and had been weakened. Meanwhile tensions were high in Birmingham. A murder inquiry was launched and a 32-year-old man arrested after the three men, guarding a petrol station from looters in Winson Green, died from injuries sustained in the incident in the early hours of Wednesday. The Bishop of Aston, the Rt Rev Antony Watson, warned of possible reprisals and events “potentially having an ugly race dimension”, following a heated meeting between local residents at a mosque. West Midlands chief constable Chris Sims appealed for calm saying he hoped the incident would not lead to “violence between different communities”. The three men who died were named as Haroon Jahan, 21, a mechanic, and brothers Shazad Ali, 30, and Abdul Musavir, 31, who ran a local car wash. Ali’s wife is said to be four months pregnant. All were from the Asian Muslim community. Police said information was the car had been “deliberately driven.” The three were said to have been in a group of 80 young men protecting a petrol station and other premises in Dudley Road, after a nearby garage had been looted. One witness said four carloads of young African-Caribbeans had cruised down Dudley Road and suggested there had been no doubt what they were planning to loot. Jahan’s father, Tariq Jahan, made an emotional appeal for calm in the community as he described how he saw the incident, but did not know his son had been hit. Holding a photograph of his son at the door of his Winson Green home, he said: “My instinct was to help the three people, I did not know who they were but they had been injured. I was helping the first man and someone told me my son was behind me. “So I started CPR on my own son, my face was covered in blood, my hands were covered in blood. Why, why?” “He was trying to help his community and he has been killed. “He was a very well-liked kid. I can’t describe to anybody what it feels like to lose a son. He was the youngest of three, and anything I ever wanted done, I would always ask Haroon to sort it out for me. “A day from now, maybe two days from now, the whole world will forget and nobody will care”. In a message to the local community, he implored: “Today we stand here to plead with all the youth to remain calm, for our communities to stand united. “This is not a race issue. The family has received messages of sympathy and support from all parts of society.” Visibly emotional, Jahan added: “I lost my son. Blacks, Asians, whites – we all live in the same community. Why do we have to kill one another? Why are we doing this? Step forward if you want to lose your sons. Otherwise, calm down and go home – please.” But elsewhere anger among residents was palpable. “Of course it was deliberate. No way was it an accident,” said one eyewitness. “The driver went on to the pavement and rammed them. He knew what he was doing”. “If the police don’t sort this one out quickly, there will be race riots,” added the man, who declined to be named, but who has given a statement to police. The family friend said Shazad, who had a degree in business management from the University of Central England, was standing near the petrol station with his brother when they were hit. Appealing on behalf of the family for people not to take the law into their own hands, he said: “It’s really, really sad. The family just want justice to be done.” Mohammed Chowdhri, a family friend said: “I have known Haroon since he was a baby, we are all absolutely devastated. He was fed up with the rioters and the looters and he was determined that they would not destroy our community.” As shoes taken off by respectful mourners formed a growing heap at a local mosque, community leaders moved rapidly to spread Jahan’s message and add words of their own. “These were bright young guys we’ve lost,” said one man. “They knew the meaning of work and got themselves decent jobs. The brothers had a carwash which was another business which might have been targeted, and Haroon worked as a mechanic in a garage. “They were well-known round here. One of them only got married in March and his wife was expecting their first child in four months’ time.” The bishop said that extended families were part of a very strong network in the community – he had met Haroon’s uncle and older brother – which added to the strength of feelings. Sobia Nazia, a cousin to the brothers, said: “They were brothers to everybody. They used to look out for everyone. They were heroes. I heard people describing them on Facebook as brothers to one and all.” Another mourner embraced Sobia and the victims’ younger sister who was welcoming mourners into the house, and said in Urdu: “They died martyrs.” The sister was too upset to reply, but Sobia said firmly: “We don’t want anything more to happen – just the culprits brought to justice. We don’t want other families to suffer. It’s the youth. They have no knowledge, they have no jobs and they are bored.” Warnings of racial violence came ahead of parliament being recalled on Thursday and as Cameron announced contingency plans were in place to deploy water cannon at 24 hours notice if necessary as part of a police “fightback” to contain the rioting and looting that has swept England since Saturday. Home secretary Theresa May ordered chief constables to cancel “all police leave” to deal with the rioting crisis, saying “maximising the police presence on the street must be a priority”, in affected areas. An emergency reserve of riot police has been put on standby as senior police tackle the unprecedented challenges of disorder, which has spread from London, to cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Salford, Nottingham, Bristol and Liverpool. Courts were sitting throughout the night, as the first of those to be prosecuted in connection with looting and violent disorder appeared, including a primary school assistant, and an 11-year-old boy. Visiting Birmingham on Wednesday, Cameron described the deaths in the city as “a truly dreadful incident”, adding that the police were “working night and day to get to the bottom of what happened and bring the perpetrators to justice.” Earlier, as he left a meeting of the government’s emergency committee Cobra, he said every contingency was being looked at and “nothing is off the table” in providing police with the resources needed to tackle the disturbance. Police would get whatever resources they needed, and legal backing for whatever tactics they needed to employ. “We needed a fightback and a fightback is underway.” The riots had shown “pockets of society” were not just broken “but frankly sick”. He said he expected prison sentences for those convicted of violent disorder, and that detectives were going through CCTV. Looters would be tracked down “picture by picture” and he would not let “phoney concerns about human rights get in the way of the publication of these pictures”. In London, 805 people have now been arrested in connection with violence, disorder and looting – with 251 charged. In total across England there have been more than 1,100 arrested. Six forces are now receiving reinforcements as part of the national mutual aid operation set up to deal with the scale of the looting. London, Manchester, the West Midlands, Gloucestershire, Nottinghamshire and Avon and Somerset have all been sent officers. Sir Hugh Orde, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said if other forces requested help they would be supported. Orde, who has been having regular discussions with the prime minister and the home secretary at Cobra, said: “Clearly these are challenging times. We are in an unprecedented situation but we are determined to do our best to ensure that forces have adequate mutual aid for anyone who requests it.” A mobile reserve of police support units to provide a rapid response for forces, and made up of public order officers across the country, will be kept in one or two geographic locations to be called upon when needed. Cameron and inner-city MPs have been briefed by police chiefs that well- established street gang leaders have been organising some of the worst violence. Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, demanded to know why the government had not acted on a substantial report in 2008, which claimed “agencies had missed significant opportunities to work with young people involved or likely to get involved in gangs.” She said: “Community leaders have been warning for some time about a growing gang culture in parts of our cities, and this has clearly been one factor in these appalling events.” She was backed by Labour MPs, including Graham Stringer the MP for Manchester Blackley and Broughton who claimed known members of the criminal underworld, gang leaders were present directing small groups of five or six where to go”. He claimed as many as 48 gang leaders operated in Manchester, but the fight against them had been weakened as police resources had been switched to fighting Muslim extremists.” While West Midlands police forensic teams prioritised the Winson Green incident, the force said that 11 other people were suspected of involvement. The chief constable said: “Like everyone else in Birmingham, my concern now will be that that single incident doesn’t lead to a much wider and more general level of distrust, and even worse, violence, between different communities.” But it was clear, feelings were at fever pitch. Describing the mosque meeting, Watson said: “There was a feeling that policing was soft, that’s been quite a common theme, and that discipline at home is too soft. There was quite a lot of anger that was hard to control, some people were saying ‘we should retaliate’. Others saying ‘we shouldn’t’. The tricky thing is it’s perceived as a race issue, that it’s part of an ongoing issue between blacks and Asians.” UK riots Police Metropolitan police Crime Boris Johnson Tax and spending Birmingham London Manchester Patrick Wintour Martin Wainwright Riazat Butt Sandra Laville Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bachmann Is Latest Target in Media’s War on Conservative Women

Liberal bias is rampant among the media, but there is no more tangible example of it than in how the media treat Conservative women. The

Continue reading …
If the Tea Party Were Liberal

Just imagine there was a giant swarm of super-super liberal freshmen in Congress. They had given the President a “shellacking,” secured a large number of seats in the House of Representatives and had been on the job for eight months. Just a bunch of lockstep liberals clogging up the Capitol. In that time, they’d done amazingly little work while cashing their government paychecks. Sure, they’re supposed to represent a nation still wounded from the worst economic disaster in two generations, instead they spend all of their time debating and passing symbolic go-nowhere bills while going on television to blame the economy on the President. That’s when they’re not on recess. These freshmen hate Washington so much they’re almost never there. Oh, and their battle cry while doing nothing which keeps the government from functioning? “Washington is broken!” These imagined liberal freshmen are extremists. They’ve already signed a pledge with a liberal lobbyist saying that they will not – under any circumstances whatsoever – cut, alter or in anyway change social safety nets. So whatever burning national issue of overriding importance comes up their only solution is to adhere to their lobbyist’s pledge. The Smurfs use the word “smurf” for all verbs. As in: “I’m going to smurf you!” These extreme no-lawmakers use “social security.” As in: “We can social security our way out of this crisis.” And they want to re-write the Constitution. Yes, they say it’s a great document (blah blah blah) but it would be much better if it were amended to suit their sole goal of bringing down the incumbent President. So since the last amendment took 203 years from proposal to ratification – they decide no one can do anything until we have another amendment. Then the polls say that Congress’ approval rating is at an all time low . The margin of error looks more favorably on the Congress than the American public. As a direct result of the brazen incompetence and blind ideology – a rating agency downgrades the country’s Treasuries. The stock market tumbles. These liberal tea party-like folks are caught on video cheering at the news of the chaos they’ve caused . If they were liberals – Fox News would run headlines: “Liberals Hate America.” Well, basically Fox News would say pretty much the same stuff, but in this case it would be warranted. These liberal obstructionists would be called terrorists. Not just maybe once in a private off the record meeting with the VP – but on the record and all the time. Since these liberal freshmen would seem to have the same economic goals for the U.S. as Osama bin Laden – that would be pointed out repeatedly. They’d be accused of treason. Their loyalty would be questioned: “Are they upholding the Constitution or their pledge?” There would be calls to deport them. People would tell them to leave the country and go wreck some other economy. They’d be dubbed a hoard of Neros fiddling with their pledges while Rome burned. If liberals were doing to the country what extremist tea party Republicans are doing – it would be called unpatriotic. A whole tsunami of sound bites would sweep the country calling for the sabotage to stop. Liberal dissent is akin to a security breach but conservative economic calamity is given a pass. We’ve treated the tea party like they are our country’s kooky, graying, drunken uncle at Thanksgiving dinner spouting some non sequiturs he picked up on AM radio. When really they are well-funded economic saboteurs who refuse to participate in the democratic process. Their goal of causing the executive branch of government to fail means our entire country goes with it. The media likes to pretend it treats the political spectrum as opposite equals. The right is the same as the left – the other side of the same argument. Politics is not symmetrical nor is the coverage of the partisans. Nothing makes this clearer than the coverage and tolerance of the brinksmanship-happy tea party. If liberals did this to their own country they’d be called criminals. The tea party did do this to their own country and they are treated like avant-garde Civil War reenactors.

Continue reading …
In N.Y. Times, There Are No Liberal Democrats, Only ‘Influential Democrats’

Ultraliberals are breaking ranks with the president on the right of Medicaid recipients to sue to “enforce their right to care – and to challenge Medicaid cuts being made by states around the country.” Times reporter Robert Pear wrote up that story – without the “ultraliberal” part. In fact, the lawsuit-backing liberals were described only as “influential Democrats.” The brief was filed by seven influential Democrats, including Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, an architect of Medicaid; Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House minority leader; Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate majority leader; and Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the chairman of the Finance Committee. The lifetime ACU ratings of this grouping: Waxman (4), Pelosi (2.5), Reid (17.9), and Baucus (14).

Continue reading …
Rep. Joe Walsh: U.S. ‘Would Have Been Downgraded Months Ago’ Without the Tea Party

Click here to view this media Deadbeat dad, Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) Tuesday rejected the notion that tea party Republicans’ brinkmanship and refusal to raise taxes contributed to S&P’s decision downgrade U.S. credit. Both Obama adviser, David Axelrod and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) had referred to S&P action as ” the tea party downgrade ” Sunday. “If it wasn’t so pathetic, I mean, it’s almost comical,” Walsh told CNN’s Kyra Phillips. “We were told months ago that a downgrade was likely, because this economy is falling off a cliff, and we have a debt crisis. That’s all on the door of the president. His policies are responsible for this. And for him here at the last minute, him and his minions, to trot out this thing called the tea party downgrade, is comical, and it won’t work, because most Americans see right through it.” When he asked to explain why congressional approval was at an all-time low, Walsh again attacked the president. “This president never ceases to not provide leadership. Why is he focused on name calling now?” the congressman wondered. “But this downgrade has happened because of how the debt deal turned out,” Phillips noted. “It is a reaction to what happened among lawmakers during the debt deal. So, are you saying that the trillions of dollars that have been lost now in the stock market, you know, has been worth all that back and forth and that bickering? I mean, is partisan politics helping this country move forward at all?” “Kyra, folks in the market are a lot smarter than you and I are,” Walsh insisted. “It had nothing to do with an August 2 deadline. It had to do with our debt crisis. We’ve known about this for ages. And I got to tell you something, thank God for all these troublesome House Republicans who came to this town. Can you imagine what life would be like if we hadn’t? We would have raised the debt ceiling without thinking about it last February or March. We’d be spending money every single day. We would have been downgraded months ago.” “These House Republicans have forced this town to finally get serious about spending. That’s a good thing.”

Continue reading …
Final Chapter: The Congressional Page Program’s Highs and Lows

First stagecoach drivers, then assembly-line workers, and now congressional pages. Technology has claimed them all. To commemorate the end of the pages, NewsFeed looks back at notable moments of their gofer history.  House Majority Leader John Boehner and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi released a joint statement yesterday explaining that the program was going to

Continue reading …
Slouching Toward a Double-Dip, for No Good Reason

Imagine your house is burning. You call the fire department but your call isn’t answered because every fire fighter in town is debating whether there will be enough water to fight fires over the next ten years, even though water is plentiful right now. (Yes, there’s a long-term problem.) One faction won’t even allow the fire trucks out of the garage unless everyone agrees to cut water use. An agency that rates fire departments has just issued a downgrade, causing everyone to hoard water. While all this squabbling continues, your house burns to the ground and the fire has now spread to your neighbors’ homes. But because everyone is preoccupied with the wrong question (the long-term water supply) and the wrong solution (saving water now), there’s no response. In the end, the town comes up with a plan for the water supply over the next decade, but it’s irrelevant because the whole town has been turned to ashes. Okay, I exaggerate a bit, but you get the point. The American economy is on the verge of another recession. Most Americans haven’t even emerged from the last one. Consumers (70 percent of the economy) won’t or can’t spend because their major asset is worth a third less than it was five years ago, they can’t borrow as before, and they’re justifiably worried about their jobs and wages. And without customers, businesses won’t expand and hire. So we’re trapped in a vicious cycle that’s getting worse. But the government won’t come to the rescue by spending more and cutting most peoples’ taxes because it’s obsessed by a so-called “debt crisis” based on budget projections over the next ten years. That obsession — which serves the ideological purposes of right-wing Republicans who really want to shrink government — has even spread to the eat-your-spinach media, deficit hawks in the Democratic Party, and a major (and thoroughly irresponsible) credit-rating agency that’s neither standard nor poor. Meanwhile, some lazy (or misinformed) commentators are linking our faux debt crisis to Europe’s real one. But the two are entirely different. Several European nations don’t have enough money to repay what they owe their lenders, or even pay the interest. That’s threatening the entire euro-zone. But there’s no question that the United States has enough money to pay what it owes. We’re the richest nation in the world and we print the money the world relies on. The only question on this side of the pond is whether tea-party Republicans will allow America to pay its bills when the debt-ceiling fight resumes at the end of 2012. Europe is scared of what’s happening in the United States – but it’s not America’s faux “debt crisis” that’s spooked them. It’s the slowdown here (and the likelihood of another recession), made all the worse as our debt obsession prevents the U.S. government from doing what it should. A slowdown and recession here mean fewer exports from Europe to America. When combined with their genuine debt crisis, this could push Europe’s economy over the edge. The most important aspect of policy making is getting the problem right. We are slouching toward a double dip because we’re getting the problem wrong. Despite what Standard & Poor’s says, notwithstanding what’s occurring in Europe, and regardless of U.S. budget projections years from now — our current crisis is jobs, wages, and growth. We do not now have a debt crisis. Every time you hear an American politician analogize the nation’s budget to a family budget (as, sadly, even President Obama has done), you should know the politician is not telling the truth. The truth is just the opposite. Our national budget can and should counteract the shrinkage of family budgets by running larger deficits when families cannot. Americans are more frightened, economically insecure, and angrier than at any time since the Great Depression. If our lawmakers continue to obsess about the wrong thing and fail to do what must be done — and they don’t explain it to the nation — Americans will only become more fearful, insecure, and angry. We are slouching toward a double dip, with all the human costs that implies. We don’t have to be. That is the tragedy of our time. Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future, now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org.

Continue reading …
Scarborough Tells Mika ‘A President That Cannot Control 45 Backbenchers…Is Too Weak to be President’

Joe Scarborough on Tuesday told his “Morning Joe” co-host an inconvenient truth that she and most of her colleagues in the media just can't handle. “A president that cannot control 45 backbenchers in the opposing Party in the House of Representatives is too weak to be President of the United States. It is that simple” (video follows with transcript and commentary): JOE SCARBOROUGH, CO-HOST: [Obama’s] a mediator. And he sits and, “What do you think? What do you think?” MIKA BRZEZINSKI , CO-HOST: Well. SCARBOROUGH: “We’ll go halfway.” He… BRZEZINSKI : Look. SCARBOROUGH: He doesn’t understand, Mika, he controls the world stage. He has a power with that bully pulpit that nobody else has and he will not use it. BRZEZINSKI : He controls the world’s stage unless the Republicans say they will not negotiate on anything. SCARBOROUGH: That’s just not true. That’s just not true. BRZEZINSKI : I want to read from Joe’s piece on Saturday. SCARBOROUGH: That is just not true. BRZEZINSKI : Hold on. EUGENE ROBINSON: Just to interject quickly, when he drew a line, when the President drew a line in the debt… BRZEZINSKI : Yes. ROBINSON: …in the debt ceiling debate, and when he said, you know, this and no further, I, it’s got to be a longer-term deal that gets us past the election, he got it. He got what he wanted. SCARBOROUGH: Right. ROBINSON: When he used the bully pulpit, he swayed public opinion. BRZEZINSKI : Who he already negotiated on way down in the House. ROBINSON: Exactly. Yeah, no that’s true. Wow. So after months of haggling, the only thing the most powerful man in the world got was a deal that kicked the can further down the road until after the election, and Brzezinski as well as Robinson, ever the dutiful shills, see that as a huge victory. Scarborough didn’t: SCARBOROUGH: A president that cannot control 45 backbenchers in the opposing Party in the House of Representatives is too weak to be President of the United States. It is that simple. Lyndon Johnson would have eaten these people up for breakfast and spit them out before lunch. BRZEZINSKI : Okay. These people though are the very people that I think don’t care… SCARBOROUGH: Ronald Reagan wouldn’t put up, I mean, a strong leader doesn’t put up with it. BRZEZINSKI : …about… SCARBOROUGH: It doesn’t matter whether they care or not. You make them irrelevant to the process if you’re strong enough to do that. Scarborough, who clearly is coming around to the obvious leadership deficiencies of this President, was spot on. As much as I love the Tea Party, a huge part of their success stems from the weakness of Barack Obama. A minority faction in one chamber of Congress should not be wielding the kind of power this fledgling movement is. Don't get me wrong, I am quite thrilled that this is the case, but agree with Scarborough that a Reagan, Johnson, or even a Clinton would have pushed back much more effectively. Consider that the real legislative impact of the Republican revolution in the '90s didn't happen until after their second successful election in 1996. Clinton stonewalled their budget and tax cuts until 1997 thereby furthering his own reelection. By contrast, Obama began caving to Tea Party demands in December weeks before any of them was sworn in. Now, eight months later, he has become almost irrelevant, a situation that as NewsBusters pointed out earlier has been enabled by his equally hapless fans in the media. This of course includes Brzezinski and Robinson. Maybe with more exchanges like this, they'll come around – but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Continue reading …
S&P Downgrade Is Media’s Fault Not The Tea Party’s

Obama advisers , Democrat senators , and terminally stupid ideologues that for days have blamed Standard and Poor's downgrade of America's debt on the Tea Party are sadly mistaken. Next to the President of the United States and his Party, those really responsible are members of the media. Since the junior senator from Illinois first threw his hat into the presidential ring in February 2007, America's press have refused to hold his feet to the fire concerning any important issue facing the nation. This debt ceiling debate and resulting downgrade were just the most recent examples. When Congressman Paul Ryan ( R-Wisc .) offered his 2012 budget proposal in April, news outlet after news outlet lined up to demagogue him mimicking talking points from the White House and the Democrat leadership. Rather than accurately report that it would save Medicare from total bankruptcy in 2024 while trimming $6 trillion of red ink – a figure that we now know would have averted S&P's downgrade – America's press dishonestly told the public Ryan's bill would destroy the nation's senior healthcare plan Nevermind that the President's only officially proposed budget – which would have increased the debt by almost $10 trillion and certainly resulted in a rating downgrade – actually lost 97-0 in the Senate not even getting one vote from members of his own Party; the media still continued to lambaste and excoriate Ryan and anyone that had the nerve to support a bill that passed the House 235-189 the month before. As summer came, and Washington began talking about the looming debt ceiling “crisis”, the press assisted the White House and its Party to evoke fear in the nation about a potential default on Treasury paper as well as Social Security payments to seniors. This came despite there being ample ongoing tax receipts to pay the interest on the debt, Social Security and Medicare recipients as well as military paychecks. Rather than mercifully telling Americans they shouldn't be concerned about such things, our news media shamefully disseminated the lies coming from the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats unprofessionally ginning up the fear in the country rather than quelling it as you would think was their charter. Even when given a chance to discuss specifics with treasury secretary Timothy Geithner , prominent Sunday talk show hosts opted to ignore the crucial questions Americans were clearly most concerned about. As House Republicans put together a Cut, Cap, and Balance bill that would solve the debt ceiling impasse while significantly trimming spending as well as mandating a balanced budget in the future, press outlets assisted the Democrat campaign to defeat it. This was despite a CNN poll finding 66 percent of respondents in favor of CCB and 74 percent supporting a balanced budget amendment. It was obvious to the few impartial observers in the nation that so-called journalists were badly on the wrong the side of public opinion on this issue. Media opposition to CCB continued even after it passed the House 234-190 which certainly made it easier for Majority Leader Harry Reid ( D-Nev .) to prevent the bill from ever getting voted on in the Senate, a strategy the press applauded. We now know the passage of CCB likely also would have prevented last Friday's downgrade. What this means is that this year, House Republicans passed two plans that probably would have preserved America's AAA credit rating if they had cleared the Senate and been signed by the President. We also know that much like the White House and the Democrat Party, virtually every news outlet in this country with the exception of the minority of conservative ones opposed both of these pieces of legislation. Meanwhile, the only budget proposed by the Left – the President's – didn't get one vote in the Senate. For their part, Congressional Democrats were totally MIA in this process having failed to offer a budget for well over two years, an abdication of responsibility that curiously doesn't concern America's media while the nation struggles with a budget crisis that could result in a far more calamitous financial disaster than the one we experienced three years ago. Such folks were more fascinated and supportive of fantasy plans like the so-called “grand bargain” floated by the President during one of his many televised appearances. Because it included revenue increases – tax hikes to you and me! – the press were almost orgasmic despite nothing having been put on paper for anyone to thoroughly analyze and the near certainty that the offer was largely cynical given the metaphysical certitude Democrats would never have supported any plan containing Medicare and Social Security cuts. As a comical aside, the Congressional Budget Office months earlier commented about its inability to score budget proposals made during presidential speeches. Clearly, the media don't have such a problem, for Obama's “grand bargain” with or without the inconvenience of parchment or specificity was, as Goldilocks would say, just right. What wasn't right to them of course was the final bill that passed in the House last Monday 269-161 in a rare case of bipartisanship with half of the Democrats supporting it. Bipartisanship continued to carry the day Tuesday when the bill passed the Senate 74-26. This rare bout of unity seemed to infuriate the normally bipartisanship-loving press as they called Tea Partiers terrorists and hostage takers for their role in crafting a package that so many members of Congress from both sides of the aisle had the nerve to vote for. As MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell noted Monday, “Almost half of the Congress almost always votes against increasing the debt ceiling. The Party out of power leaves raising the debt ceiling to the Party in power.” “In fact,” O'Donnell continued, “last week's vote for a debt ceiling increase was the most bipartisan vote to increase the debt ceiling we have seen in a very, very long time.” You certainly couldn't tell that by all the finger-pointing at the Tea Party once S&P announced the downgrade. Much like the bipartisan support of the Iraq War resolution in October 2002, the Democrats quickly took on a “They Made Me Do It” posture once the agreement they supported became unpopular. True to form, the media were just as willing to give their Party cover now as they were then. Must be nice to know if your vote ends up being a political albatross, the press will be there to help you remove the burden. But all this assistance to the White House and its Party has come at a dear cost to the nation. If press members had been doing their jobs all year, the President and the Democrat leadership would have been forced to put legitimate, written counter-proposals on the table as they unceremoniously swatted aside those offered by Republicans. Maybe then a far more encompassing piece of legislation would have been in front of Congress in July with more sweeping short and long-term cuts that would have appeased the credit rating agencies while setting the nation on a more solid fiscal course. Instead, the media played willing accomplices to Obama and his Party with total disregard for the lack of leadership on display. As a result, we're now a double-A+ nation that appears to be heading towards a double-dip recession.

Continue reading …

Fox News hires as many ex-Bushies as they can get and there’s a good reason for that. They all play a role. Like when they need someone to slam the UN, you can practically hear Roger Ailes scream, “Come on down, John Bolton!” Dana Perino went to bat for her ex-boss, George Bush, who under his watch damaged our society and economy so badly that you’re lucky if you can get a cup of tap water and bag of chips on four hour plane ride. Eric Bolling is not an ex-Bushie, but is trying to get more face time on Fox. He’s a very boring flame-thrower type if that makes sense to you. He says the most outrageous things – trying to be the next Beck, but lacks the delivery necessary to give it that Tabasco kick. Instead you get soggy Fritos. Anyway, the S&P downgrade has Bolling, Fox and Perino getting mad that George Bush’s name still gets mentioned since the markets and our economy collapsed under his leadership. Bolling:… A lot of finger pointing is going on in the Obama White House at your former boss, George Bush saying ‘we inherited that recession, we inherited that debt, that malaise,’ guess what they also inherited from you and your boss? An AAA credit rating. Weigh in on the first ever downgrade on American debt . OK, I’ll stop right there and say that Bolling is so stupid he made our points for us. While trying to find something positive to give Bush credit for in his eight year destructive career, he backed up the truth that Shrub screwed America’s financial markets and our budget surpluses, but by the time Wall Street collapsed, he was leaving office so we still had an AAA rating by S&P. Thanks for the help, Eric. Perino; The blaming Bush stuff is kinda expected, kind of annoying. If they think they’re going to go into the next election year and they could win… It was annoying that we had to live through the Bush years, Dana. Watching what we saw his administration do to America and all. It’s kind of annoying listening to you complain about the mention of Bush’s name, but I can always change the channel. By the way, where is Bush these days? He’s been excommunicated by the GOP from the political scene since the day he left office since the GOP worries when his face does pop up on a TV screen. His mug does tend to remind Americans about his presidency which is not a good thing for Republicans. That’s just a fact.

Continue reading …