Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 41)

The House homeland security panel has set its sights on another extremist over possible ties to the 9/11 attacks: the cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a dual citizen of the US and Yemen, reports Fox News . “We need to do this in light of al-Awlaki’s growing stature,” committee chair Peter King tells…

Continue reading …

A 16-year-old was charged today in the murder of a retiree who tried to put out a fire during the London riots. Richard Mannington Bowes, 68, was trying to douse flames in a bin near his house when a group of rioters surrounded him, according to video footage viewed by…

Continue reading …
Rep. Clyburn: The President is Going to Have to Lay the Jobs Problem at the Doorsteps of the Republican Leadership

Click here to view this media CNN’s John King talked to the Assistant Minority Leader, Rep. James Clyburn about President Obama’s recent bus tour and his continued unwillingness to call the Republican leadership out directly for obstructing bipartisan legislation. Tons of bills that are pending in both houses of Congress to get Americans back to work. And I agree with the Congressman’s statement at the very end of the segment, after venting some of the frustration he and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus have had with the president for focusing on things like deficit reduction instead of jobs and for not going to some of the areas that have been hardest hit in this economy. KING: Do you prefer — you’re the assistant Democratic leader, you’re in the minority now. The Republicans control the House. Would you prefer the president not blame the people in Washington or the Congress and specifically say the Republicans? CLYBURN: Yes, I would prefer that and I’ve had those discussions with the president on other occasions — KING: And why won’t he get tougher with them? Why won’t he get tougher with them? CLYBURN: Well, I hope he will. I don’t know. I think the president by nature wants to be diplomatic. I’m the same way. I call myself a southern gentleman, but there are times when I put that aside and go right to the core of the problem. The problem is that the Republican leadership refuses to allow a jobs bill to come to the floor. I have one that’s got bipartisan support. It has a companion bill over in the Senate that has bipartisan support. The co- sponsorship is bipartisan. But we cannot get them to bring this to the floor. And I think the president sooner or later is going to have to lay this right at the doorsteps of the Republican leadership. We did not vote for all of these things that’s got us in this problem today. Democrats have supported his agenda and we still look forward to supporting him in the future. He needs to call the Republicans out. That’s who is stopping this legislation, not the Democrats. It looks like Clyburn and some of his colleagues are as frustrated as the rest of us with President Obama continuing to just take shots at the Congress as a whole, instead of identifying who is being unreasonable and obstructing and who has been willing to compromise, and in the eyes of most liberals out there, been willing to compromise too much. Full transcript below the fold. KING: Now he’s on a bus tour. Let me show you the map as we bring it out here, the president of the United States on a bus tour that started in Minnesota. It’s going down through Minnesota. He’s now in Iowa, he’s in Decorah (ph), Iowa now. He’ll go to Iowa again tomorrow, then he’s in some rural counties in Illinois there. That’s the president of the United States out here in the Midwest, three states that were critical to him back in the 2008 campaign, Illinois obviously his home state. The Congressional Black Caucus proposes a jobs tour. It’s on the schedule right now through Detroit, Cleveland, Atlanta, Miami and Los Angeles. You see the president out here largely in white rural America. The CBC saying let’s have a jobs focus in African-American and minority communities across America. So does the president’s focus on states critical to his re- election mean overlooking communities with a need for help is beyond critical? In Columbia, South Carolina tonight the highest ranking African-American in the Congress (INAUDIBLE) Democratic leader James Clyburn. Congressman Clyburn, let’s get straight to that. Would you prefer — I know you support the president and you know he needs to go to these electorally (ph) important states for him. But would you prefer if he’s going to do a jobs tour that he start in Columbia, South Carolina where unemployment among African-Americans is near 19 percent, maybe Selma, Alabama where it’s above 20 percent? CLYBURN: Well I don’t think that we have to worry about where he starts. The problem is where will the impact be of job creation? Will we get a jobs Bill out of the Congress? I understand that the president’s going to be coming forward in September with a comprehensive job bill. I hope that’s the case. I’m also hopeful that as we talk about deficit reduction, and those kinds of things that we can include job creation in those discussions as well. Because the quickest way to reduce the deficit, I believe, is to get people back to work. They’ll be paying taxes. They won’t be drawing unemployment. And they will, in fact, be contributing to deficit reduction. So I would love to see a comprehensive jobs program in the very near future because I think that’s what will get people’s confidence restored and get our communities back on the right track. KING: As you know, though, and you tend to be more diplomatic, especially on television, than some of your colleagues and I respect that, as you know there’s been some grumbling in the Black Caucus and in what I’ll call the progressive community at large about the president’s focus, whether the subject be deficit reduction or where he’s traveling right now focusing on jobs. The chairman of the CBC, Emanuel Cleaver from Missouri said this to “The Washington Post” just last week. “What the president is doing is not the same as what we’re doing. We have real jobs to give real people who are unemployed. This is not one of those deals where we go around and talk about jobs and hope somebody gives us some press attention.” That’s a pretty harsh criticism of the president of the United States, the first African- American president to the United States from a leading African- American in the Congress, is it not? CLYBURN: Well, I didn’t get that he was directly talking about the president there. I’m not too sure that there aren’t other tours taking place that might have been the point of reference. I was with Emanuel Cleaver over the weekend, and we had long talks about what’s going on with the Congressional Black Caucus tomorrow in Detroit, later on in Miami, Atlanta, and then out in Los Angeles. Just because we’re ending the tour in Los Angeles doesn’t mean the emphasis is not on Los Angeles as well. We started in Cleveland, Ohio, around 7,000 people showed up. I think around 2,200 people got connected with jobs. But I think that that’s what Cleaver was talking about, trying to do a jobs tour where we bring employers and potential employees in to the same room and see if we can get the confidence restored again because too many people have stopped looking. They’ve just dropped out of the process altogether. We want to get them back in. And the way you do that, I think, is the way the CBC is conducting this tour. I think that’s what he had reference to. KING: I want you to listen to some of the president on the trail today. He’s being a bit more populous (ph) and he’s the president of the United States. He holds the most powerful job in Washington. And yet he’s making the case — and I think you would understand his frustration — that he can’t get a lot of things done because he can’t get them through the Congress. I want you to listen to this and I want to you if you would choose the same words. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) OBAMA: People are doing the right thing. Well, if you can do the right thing, then folks in Washington have to do the right thing. And if we do that, there is not a problem that we face that we cannot solve. (END VIDEO CLIP) KING: Do you prefer — you’re the assistant Democratic leader, you’re in the minority now. The Republicans control the House. Would you prefer the president not blame the people in Washington or the Congress and specifically say the Republicans? CLYBURN: Yes, I would prefer that and I’ve had those discussions with the president on other occasions — KING: And why won’t he get tougher with them? Why won’t he get tougher with them? CLYBURN: Well, I hope he will. I don’t know. I think the president by nature wants to be diplomatic. I’m the same way. I call myself a southern gentleman, but there are times when I put that aside and go right to the core of the problem. The problem is that the Republican leadership refuses to allow a jobs bill to come to the floor. I have one that’s got bipartisan support. It has a companion bill over in the Senate that has bipartisan support. The co- sponsorship is bipartisan. But we cannot get them to bring this to the floor. And I think the president sooner or later is going to have to lay this right at the doorsteps of the Republican leadership. We did not vote for all of these things that’s got us in this problem today. Democrats have supported his agenda and we still look forward to supporting him in the future. He needs to call the Republicans out. That’s who is stopping this legislation, not the Democrats.

Continue reading …
Parent Regrets: Why I Wish We Never Went to See Taylor Swift

A note to moms: If you’re thinking about taking your daughters to see Taylor Swift as their first concert, and maybe your first show since the Indigo Girls in 1996, please don’t. If you’re thinking you’ll see a sweet Southern singer/songwriter on stage with her guitar, a few pretty dresses, and simplistic but heartfelt lyrics, you won’t. The overwhelming message of the Swift concert to the sea of girls ages 5 to 55: be pretty, be conventional, be quiet (well, it’s OK to scream for me), and definitely put on some lipstick. When my 10-year-old daughter learned to belt out “A Place in this World” on her guitar a few months ago, I began to feel some affection for Swift. Country music up until the quasi-country, anti-Bush Dixie Chicks had never appealed to me, but Swift’s commitment to writing her own songs and to making her own way in the music business was compelling. And she even maintained some dignity after being publicly berated by an obnoxious Kanye West. On a recent trip to Washington, DC, my husband and I splurged on Swift tickets for ourselves and kids — an 8-year-old boy and two girls, ages 10 and 12. We thought the young singer would be especially inspirational to our daughters who love her music and are avid musicians. We joined the ebullient, predominantly female concertgoers in floral H&M jumpers and cowboy boots streaming into DC’s Verizon Center. Many arrived holding their daughters’ hands before the first two opening bands to stand in long lines for Swift t-shirts and merchandise and take photos next to the towering Swift cutouts in the lobby. The scene was sweet until you got to the CoverGirl stands (Swift is a CoverGirl) where girls of all ages sat on stools before stage mirrors to receive makeovers — perhaps selecting the lip and eye colors that Taylor wears. The message — you’re not really beautiful until you cake your tiny, pre-pubescent face with makeup — wasn’t the empowering one I had envisioned. (I later watched a five year old with ruby red lipstick pouting because the color had come off in her cotton candy. Welcome to the hardscrabble world, baby.) OK, I thought, that’s advertising — not Swift’s fault? Actually the pre-tweens in makeup set the scene for the CoverGirl meets Disney extravaganza. After her opening “Sparks Fly,” that featured an inordinate amount of hair flipping, Swift stood on the stage for what felt like a long and awkward few minutes, taking in the screams of her girl fans, eyes wide open with feigned amazement. Glancing to the far reaches of the arena where fans paid upwards of $130 per ticket, she gazed left. She gazed right. She beamed. She stood still and put her hands to her heart. Throughout the concert, even the best songs — “Speak Now” and “Fifteen” — were convoluted by an elaborate stage show and a relentless multimedia set with projected live images of Swift inside a gigantic framed mirror. Hearts and words with curly-cue lettering flashed on the screens. (The most ironic image projected was of a girl’s quaint bulletin board with a tacked up ticket stub for a concert that cost $10.) Dancers swirled up and down a staircase in the middle of the set and around Swift like something out of Glee, but not as entertaining. The music and lyrics (which do speak to girls) were secondary to the sparkle and fireworks — literally — of the stage. Fleshing out the princess theme, Swift even drifted just above the crowd in a floating balcony — her eyes seemingly meeting the eyes of each concertgoer. My husband was sure she was singing just to him. My 10-year-old girl stood rapt on her chair, taking in everything. Like most of the girls (except the 13 year old making out with her boyfriend in the row in front of me) she loudly sang along with each song. I didn’t expect Taylor Swift to make any radical, edgy, feminist remarks, but I also didn’t expect Gidget meets the Little Mermaid. What an incredible platform for Swift to say something as simple as “Girls rock!” or something even crazier like “Love yourselves!” Instead, she finished each song by looking wide-eyed into the crowd and noting how “amazing” it was that so many peopled came to the show and how “beautiful” everyone looked (incredible how she could see people with all those lights in her eyes). Maybe my family got the vacuous experience we deserved. That would be true if it were just a benignly bad concert experience. The problem is that it was an insidious concert experience that emphasized everything but the artist’s voice — the flowing fairy dresses and saccharine monologues covering up Swift’s real power. Covering up girl power. The best moments were rare authentic ones with Swift’s top lip a wee bit sweaty, hair oh-so-slightly disheveled, strumming “Mean” on a banjo and later “Fearless” on a ukulele. That’s what we had come to see, but it was fleeting. As the house lights came on, my older daughter, age 12 and a half, gave me a deflated, knowing look. My younger daughter was tired but managed to quietly gush: “I loved it.” My son loved his glow stick. I hope more discerning parents than us might think twice about Swift tickets. Better to have to explain the explicit sexuality of someone like Gaga and her “Born this Way” message than to have to undo the message of female powerlessness — especially from an artist who is so fervently emulated by girls. If you have tickets already, perhaps you can prep your music lover. It’s sort of like a game of I Spy: look hard and look deeply for Swift’s voice. It’s there, just buried in the fluff. Speak Now tour? More like Speak softly and smile a lot.

Continue reading …

New York Times White House correspondent Jackie Calmes’s 1,300-word story for the Saturday Business section, with the online headline “ G.O.P. on Defensive as Analysts Question Party’s Fiscal Policy ,” was so blatantly biased it caught the attention of neo-liberal Mickey Kaus, who posted a withering, entertaining analysis at The Daily Caller , revisiting his old theme of liberal cocooning among the Times and its readership.

Continue reading …
NYT’s Appelbaum: ‘Everything We Know About Economics’ Says Govt. ‘Should Be Getting Bigger Right Now’

The New York Times’s “Caucus” podcast last Friday was focused on the financial crisis. Washington correspondent Binyamin Appelbaum, who focuses on financial issues, joined hosts Sam Roberts and Michael Shear to call for yet more federal spending on infrastructure “investment” in the face of a national debt of $14 trillion.

Continue reading …

Just days after suggesting the Republicans who didn't agree to the compromise that created a budget Super Committee were crabby and irresponsible, several media outlets began complaining about the deficiencies of the new super committee. The Washington Post found it to be too white and male, and the AP lamented its representatives were too cozy with defense contractors. Post reporter Felicia Sonmez asserted the super-committee had ideological diversity, “But the group’s membership is marked by a problem that has plagued Congress — a lack of gender and racial diversity.”

Continue reading …

Tara Reid Marries

No Comment
Tara Reid Marries

Tara Reid Marries Michael Lilleund in Greece : People.com pontodosul says: Tara Reid Marries Michael Lillelund in Greece! http://t.co/QFlN3iI

Continue reading …
President Obama Begins Bus Tour in Minnesota Town Hall By Talking Jobs

Click here to view this media Liberals have been clamoring for the President to push for job creation instead of deficit reduction for a long time, but have been rebuked by some of his political team and liberal elitists as being childish and not serious way before Drew Westin wrote an this op-ed piece in the NY Times . In the debt-ceiling debacle, their thinking was that Independents would side with the President and his willingness to negotiate a Grand Bargain over the unmoving and obstructionism of his political foes. Since there was no way the GOP would allow revenue increases in debt-ceiling talks the debate would expose conservative-teabirchers as being out of touch with reality. Now, part of that did happen . All the latest polling shows that the GOP and tea party are viewed much worse than the Democratic Party or Obama, but he was damaged as well. The president has now embarked on a three city bus tour in the mid west designed to connect with the working class. “You’ve got to send a message to Washington that it’s time for the games to stop, it’s time to put country first,” Obama said at a town hall-style meeting in Cannon Falls, Minn., the first stop of his tour through Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois. “If you can do the right thing, then folks in Washington have to do the right thing,” the president said. “And if we do that, there is not a problem that we face that we cannot solve.” In this video he talked about extending the payroll tax break for the middle class, creating tax credits to company’s that hire our returning veterans from war who are out of work and a type of WPA program that is known as the FAST program: Its main components — extending federal unemployment benefits and the payroll tax cut beyond their expiration at the end of this year — are vitally important, but their extension will only maintain the status quo. His idea for an infrastructure bank to finance large-scale building projects is also good, but would take time, and would not address the immediate need for jobs. Ditto his push for patent reform and trade agreements. There are other ideas worth fighting for. Take, for example, Fix America’s Schools Today , or FAST, an idea that has been incorporated into a House proposal to be introduced this fall by Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). Public school buildings in the United States are on average over 40 years old and in need of an estimated $500 billion in repairs and upgrades. A $50 billion school renovation program would employ 500,000 workers (1.5 million construction workers are currently unemployed) and could be easily scaled up. The money could be disbursed through existing federal formulas to all 16,000 public school districts. The initial cost could be largely offset over 10 years by ending tax breaks for fossil fuels, as called for in Mr. Obama’s 2012 budget. Many of us want him to be strong on this issue and fight for jobs no matter if Congress will act or not and I hope his political advisers feel the same way. There was a NY Times story that said his team was going to take a non confrontational approach which has not been working, but Greg Sargent dug a little deeper and found this. Over the weekend, a stir broke out on the left when the Times reported that top Obama advisers David Plouffe and Richard Daley are privately advocating a non-confrontational approach towards the GOP on the economy. — For what it’s worth, I’ve asked for some clarification from the White House, and a senior administration official shed a bit more light on what Plouffe and Daley actually believe. According to the official, who wanted anonymity because officials don’t want to be quoted on record discussing internal messaging deliberations, Plouffe and Daley both favor a confrontational rhetorical approach that will blame Republicans for opposing any and all job creation efforts for purely political reasons; both are leading internal boosters of a message that accuses Republicans of putting party before country. — To be sure, this still doesn’t tell us how ambitious Obama is willing to be in terms of proposing genuinely ambitious and bold job creation policies in order to draw that contrast with the GOP. And liberals are right to worry that the current range of options being entertained is far too limited. But if the Obama team is serious about drawing a sharp contrast — as the senior official insists is the case — we can at least hope that the policies will follow the rhetoric. Trying to play the Independent game has shown awful results so far. Obama’s approval rating has been dropping because Democratic support has been dropping and it’s no secret why. A strong push for jobs is the right path to take without trying to be cute about it.

Continue reading …

The problem with the pro-life movement is their concerns for “life” end at birth. While writing a story about the famed Octomom (who living up to her comic book villain moniker managed to incense both pro-life and pro-choice groups), one of the pro-life advocates I interviewed explained they were concerned with “life that needs to be protected and children’s welfare.” Then realizing the slip, she quickly corrected, “We don’t agree with welfare though.” So in their view every pregnancy MUST be brought to term – but after that it’s hands off and there’s “freedom” from intervention. Then you should have your rights to privacy. Then you should make your own decisions. The wedge issue of abortion is a red herring. It’s a giant distraction – a shiny thing we all focus on and a drain on resources which could actually be going to making “life” better for American children. The easiest example is how the House GOP, riding on a wave of fiscal outrage with the promise of jobs, has spent their precious little time in session trying to criminalize a procedure for which only a minority of Americans are even eligible. Plus, numbers of abortions per year don’t change even with changing legality or availability of abortions. This means no matter how much money is thrown at making abortion not exist, according to data , the same amount of abortions still take place. So no amount of activism or mouth foam has made the numbers of abortions fewer. But it still eats up plenty of legislative time around the country. South Dakota tabled a law allowing certain people related to a fetus to be able to kill an abortion provider. Nebraska then doubled down and introduced a bill to de-criminalize all murders if the victims are abortion providers. How pro-life is that? What we lack in this country is a pro-quality-of-life movement. You know what’s killing children more than abortion? Obesity. Lack of health care. Poverty. I don’t understand how the Christian religion can be used as grounds to take a hard line on abortion, while simultaneously giving widespread poverty a pass because it’s a “personal responsibility” issue. The poor have no more famous an advocate than Jesus Christ. However, there’s a big swath of Christians who are like die hard Michael Jackson fans who have never heard his music: They admire the man but are missing what he was all about. I don’t understand how people who are so revved up over what a woman does in the privacy of her doctor’s office can just sit back and watch an entire generation of American children be doomed to a shorter lifespan than their parents. Obesity is more than a big health issue – it’s a big death issue. Condemning women’s right to choose an abortion while letting “choice” be the permission for an epidemic of overweight kids is like being a school administrator who’s really only concerned with chalk. I don’t understand how the title of “pro-life” can be claimed for any movement which does not march on the Capitol in support of better health care for post-partum kids. “Life” has to mean more than just treating women like public incubators. Truth be told a big factor in the one out of every five pregnancies ending in abortion is – unemployment. Lack of money. Lack of resources. Being pro-life is short-sighted when it comes to living. If the goal of pro-lifers is eliminating all abortions, they should start by eliminating the reasons for abortions. Unwanted pregnancy is number one, so they should be for birth control. The second is financial. So they should be for what the right wing likes to refer to despairingly as “socialism.” What would a pro-quality-of-life movement support? A living wage for people who work for a living. A viable middle class. An economy which lifts all people, not just the uber-rich . Honest, transparent and accountable corporations and elected officials. Infrastructure. Education. Health care for all. Healthy kids. Instead, those who call themselves pro-life can’t see the forest through their abortion clinic picket signs. Cross posted at TinaDupuy.com LISTEN TONIGHT: Tina will be on The Leslie Marshal Show at 5pm PST. Listen here .

Continue reading …