Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 38)
Biden Backs Off of ‘Not Second-Guessing One-Child’ Comment Made in China, No Thanks to Establishment Press

Earlier this evening, Vice President Joe Biden, through a spokesperson, backed away from his Sunday comment at a Chinese university about that nation's “one-child” policy, wherein the state allows couples, with relatively rare exceptions, to have only one child. This of course has led to a horrible abortion death toll. A Laura Ingraham email I received this evening, corroborated by a China's population minister cited by CNN in 2008 , carries an estimate of 400 million deaths (CNN said it “prevented 400 million children from being born”). It has also led to what is probably an historically unprecedented male-female gender imbalance in the neighborhood of 43-60 million . Biden's comment ( transcript ; video ) was: You have no safety net. Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you’re in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable. Biden's backoff in the wake of intense Republican, conservative, prolife and Chinese dissident criticism is in an AFP report carried at ChannelNewsAsia.com , is far from satisfactory, and contains (in bold) what can only be considered a spectacular fib in the circumstances. To its credit, AFP also found a prominent Chinese activist for a mainland perspective on the impact of Biden's Sunday remark: Under fire, Biden blasts 'repugnant' China policies Under fire from angry Republicans, US Vice President Joe Biden's office said Tuesday that he firmly opposes “repugnant” Chinese population control practices like “forced abortion and sterilization.” “The Obama administration strongly opposes all aspects of China's coercive birth limitation policies, including forced abortion and sterilization,” Biden spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff told AFP by email. “The vice president believes such practices are repugnant,” she said after Republican White House candidates blasted Biden for recent comments he made about Beijing's “one-child” population control policy during a visit to China. Biden told an audience at Sichuan University in Chengdu, China, Sunday that “your policy has been one which I fully understand — I'm not second-guessing — of one child per family.” … Barkoff pointed out that Biden, who was discussing the ratio of active workers to retirees, had also called the policy “unsustainable” and said “he was arguing against the One Child Policy to a Chinese audience.” … The vice president's statement also drew fire from a leader of the repressed Tiananmen Square protests, Chai Ling, who has become a born-again Christian and activist against the “one-child” policy. “At best, it is a statement of ambiguity that gives permission to China to continue its brutal and coercive birth planning policy,” said a statement from her advocacy group, All Girls Allowed. “At worst, it is an endorsement of the exorbitant fines, severe beatings, and forced abortions and sterilizations that are performed on thousands of Chinese families every day — an ongoing Tiananmen massacre every hour,” she said. While it's nice that AFP is reporting Biden's (pathetic) attempt to backtrack, it's likely that what he said would never have been news in the pre-New Media World: The Associated Press's original coverage of Biden's university appearance ( saved here at host for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes) made no reference to his “one-child” comment. As of 10:30 this evening, based on the results of its main site on “Biden China” (not in quotes) the AP still has nothing on what Biden said, or even the groundswell of reaction to it. A New York Times search on “Biden China” (again not in quotes), as well as a reading of the paper's reports ( here , here , and here ) on Biden's trip, surfaced nothing relating to his original one-child remarks. The first identified item is from Reuters, indicating that it is very likely that it also ignored Biden's comment in its other reporting. One of the Times's items just noted has an inadvertently humorous title: “China and U.S. Choose Safe Site for Biden Visit.” Guys, there is no safe place to let Joe Biden speak. As I see it, thirty years ago, and probably even twenty, a remark similar to Biden's would have gone virtually unnoticed. Folks like Bill Buckley, Cal Thomas, and James Kilpatrick might have detected it and written a column or two about and might have even brought it up on CNN, but no one at the White House would have felt it necessary for the Vice President attempt to backtrack. At least on a remark as outrageous as Biden's latest, that can't happen any more, even though it's clear that the AP, New York Times, and others tried to keep it bottled up. Oh, how they must despise the entire situation. Too bad, so sad. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Continue reading …
CNN’s Phillips Questions GOP Candidates’ Silence on Libya

On Tuesday morning, CNN's Kyra Phillips asked why the Republican presidential candidates have not been speaking out on foreign policy in Libya during the climactic battle in the country's capital between rebel and imperial forces. CNN had interviewed Republican candidate Jon Huntsman the night before, but had not yet asked him about the conflict in Libya, in the first of a two-part interview set to conclude Tuesday night. “This week's battle in Libya, the first big chance for the GOP presidential hopefuls to show their foreign policy savvy,” Phillips noted during the 10 a.m. hour of Newsroom. “Why haven't we heard from them?” she asked. Liberal CNN analyst Roland Martin subsequently hammered the Republicans as “wimps” for their silence. [Video below the break.] CNN prime-time host Piers Morgan had hosted candidate Jon Huntsman on Monday, but had not yet asked him about Libya. The rest of the Huntsman interview is scheduled to air Tuesday night. Analyst Roland Martin decried the GOP silence on Libya. “They know the actions the President took was the right action, but then you have the folks on the right who say, well, like Senator John McCain, he should have done something sooner,” he remarked. “But then remember you also had the House Republicans who also wanted to pass a resolution saying you should not be taking any action in Libya, and so they don't want to say anything.” “That's called weakness,” Martin added. “You want to be President? Say something. They are simply wimps.” National Review's Will Cain opposed Martin's comments, noting that the President himself has been vague on the details of the conflict in Libya, namely on the ultimate goal and the timeline for American forces to leave the country. “I'll tell you the one thing they have said, though, is they said they wouldn't go into Libya in the first place,” Cain said of the Republican candidates. “And that's not just backwards-looking. That informs how they would make decisions about Syria, the Congo, and every place else in the world that's under these same, similar situations. A transcript of the segment, which aired on August 23 at 10:30 a.m. EDT, is as follows: KYRA PHILLIPS: First question, guys. This week's battle in Libya, the first big chance for the GOP presidential hopefuls to show their foreign policy savvy, to say what they would do. Okay. Why haven't we heard from them? Roland? ROLAND MARTIN, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: Hmm, wimps! Because they are stuck between a rock and a hard place. They know the actions the President took was the right action, but then you have the folks on the right who say, well, like Senator John McCain, he should have done something sooner. But then remember you also had the House Republicans who also wanted to pass a resolution saying you should not be taking any action in Libya, and so they don't want to say anything. That's called weakness. You want to be President? Say something. They are simply wimps. PHILLIPS: Will? WILL CAIN, CNN CONTRIBUTOR: Boy, Roland, you're going to die on your own words with that. You mean these Republican candidates haven't said what the goal is in Libya? They haven't said how long we'll stay? They haven't said when we'll get out and under what conditions we'll get out? MARTIN: They have said nothing, Will. CAIN: Which would make them very similar to the President of the United States of America. MARTIN: They have said nothing. CAIN: Isn't that interesting? I'll tell you the one thing they have said, though, is they said they wouldn't go into Libya in the first place. And that's not just backwards-looking. That informs how they would make decisions about Syria, the Congo, and every place else in the world that's under these same, similar situations.

Continue reading …
Inspired By Obama, NYTimes Churns Out Another Sympathetic Story on Illegals

There’s a jubilant undercurrent in Julia Preston’s Tuesday report in the New York Times on Obama’s new policy limiting deportations of illegal immigrants who have not committed a crime, “ U.S. Issues New Deportation Policy’s First Reprieves .” Preston has a reputation for sympathetic coverage of illegal immigration policy. In December 2010 she lamented a Senate vote blocking a bill granting amnesty to illegal immigrant students as a “ painful setback .” Her tone is different today: The call came in the morning to the lawyer representing Manuel Guerra, an illegal immigrant from Mexico living in Florida who had been caught in a tortuous and seemingly failing five-year court fight against deportation. With the news early Thursday that federal immigration authorities had canceled his deportation, Mr. Guerra became one of the first illegal immigrants in the country to see results from a policy the Obama administration unveiled in Washington that day. It could lead to the suspension in coming months of deportation proceedings against tens of thousands of immigrants. Administration officials and immigrant advocates said Monday that the plan offered the first real possibility since President Obama took office — promising immigrants and Latinos he would overhaul the law to bring illegal immigrants into the system — for large numbers of those immigrants to be spared from detention and deportation. …. In particular, officials will look to halt deportations of longtime residents with clean police records who came here illegally when they were children, or are close family of military service members, or are parents or spouses of American citizens. …. In recent years, even though he was undocumented, Mr. Guerra has been a Florida leader of the illegal immigrant student movement, helping to organize a protest walk by four students to Washington and a mock university held by students wearing mortarboards on Capitol Hill.

Continue reading …

Necker Island

No Comment
Necker Island

Richard Branson’s Home on Necker Island burnt in Fire – Photos Sir Richard Branson’s Carribbean Holiday Home Is Struck By Lightning Kate Winslet Rescued Richard Branson’s Mom from Burned House (VIDEO) ClarkHearsey says: RT @ richardbranson : Currently just huddled up with family & friends in the continuing tropical storm realising what really matters in life http://t.co/xfKlBXj

Continue reading …

Gold Prices $1,900

No Comment
Gold Prices $1,900

customizeyou says: Gold Tops $ 1 , 900 , Looking ‘A Bit Bubbly’ Gold prices have been on a tear lately, topping a fresh record high above $ 1 ,90 http://t.co/IdKqKbF

Continue reading …
British public supports harsher sentences over riots

Seven in 10 people say those convicted of riot-related offences should get tougher sentences than they would normally expect The British public strongly supports tougher sentencing for those involved in rioting, a Guardian/ICM poll has found. Some 70% of respondents believe that those convicted of riot-related offences should receive a tougher sentence than they might ordinarily expect. The severity of sentences has been the focus of much debate after two men were jailed for four years after using Facebook in a failed attempt to incite a riot and a woman jailed for receiving stolen shorts was freed on appeal . The poll also showed that support for the Conservatives in August remained steady at 37%, the same as July and one point ahead of Labour. The Liberal Democrats were up one point to 17%. David Cameron has championed severe punishments for rioters, telling the House of Commons that anyone convicted “should expect to go to jail”, and threw his support behind the sentencing in the Facebook case, saying the court decided “to send a tough message and I think it’s very good that courts are able to do that”. The prime minister has faced criticism for his stance, however, with MPs, lawyers and campaigners warning against “disproportionate” sentencing. The Guardian/ICM poll asked: “Do you think that people convicted of theft or other offences during the recent riots in London and elsewhere should or should not receive a tougher prison sentence than they might ordinarily expect in order to set an example of them?” Of the respondents, 70% believed they should receive a tougher sentence, while 25% believed they should not, with 5% saying they did not know. The survey found those who would vote Conservative were more likely than Labour and Lib Dem voters to favour tougher action (82% versus 65% and 60% respectively), while tougher sentencing is also preferred by more women (74%) than men (66%). The poll showed that those in social group DE were far more likely to think rioters should receive tougher sentencing than those in the higher income AB group. In the DE group 80% of people believed those involved should receive harsher sentences, while in the AB group only 64% were of the same opinion. Last week the leading criminal barrister John Cooper QC warned that judges and magistrates had a duty “not to be influenced by angry Britain”, describing some of the sentences handed down already as “disproportionate and somewhat hysterical”. Senior Liberal Democrats also urged caution, opening up a rift in the coalition. The Lib Dem peer Lord Macdonald, who led the prosecution service in England and Wales for five years, warned that the courts risked being swept up in a “collective loss of proportion” , passing jail terms that lack “humanity or justice”. His fellow peer Lord Carlile, the barrister who was until this year the government’s independent adviser on terrorism strategy, warned against ministerial interference in the judicial process, arguing that “just filling up prisons” would not prevent future problems. The former party leader Sir Menzies Campbell said it was important that “political influence is not directed at the judicial system”. “With all due deference to the prime minister, politicians should not be either cheering or booing in the matter of sentencing,” he said. • ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,004 adults aged 18+ by telephone on 19-21 August 2011. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. UK riots Opinion polls Adam Gabbatt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
British public supports harsher sentences over riots

Seven in 10 people say those convicted of riot-related offences should get tougher sentences than they would normally expect The British public strongly supports tougher sentencing for those involved in rioting, a Guardian/ICM poll has found. Some 70% of respondents believe that those convicted of riot-related offences should receive a tougher sentence than they might ordinarily expect. The severity of sentences has been the focus of much debate after two men were jailed for four years after using Facebook in a failed attempt to incite a riot and a woman jailed for receiving stolen shorts was freed on appeal . The poll also showed that support for the Conservatives in August remained steady at 37%, the same as July and one point ahead of Labour. The Liberal Democrats were up one point to 17%. David Cameron has championed severe punishments for rioters, telling the House of Commons that anyone convicted “should expect to go to jail”, and threw his support behind the sentencing in the Facebook case, saying the court decided “to send a tough message and I think it’s very good that courts are able to do that”. The prime minister has faced criticism for his stance, however, with MPs, lawyers and campaigners warning against “disproportionate” sentencing. The Guardian/ICM poll asked: “Do you think that people convicted of theft or other offences during the recent riots in London and elsewhere should or should not receive a tougher prison sentence than they might ordinarily expect in order to set an example of them?” Of the respondents, 70% believed they should receive a tougher sentence, while 25% believed they should not, with 5% saying they did not know. The survey found those who would vote Conservative were more likely than Labour and Lib Dem voters to favour tougher action (82% versus 65% and 60% respectively), while tougher sentencing is also preferred by more women (74%) than men (66%). The poll showed that those in social group DE were far more likely to think rioters should receive tougher sentencing than those in the higher income AB group. In the DE group 80% of people believed those involved should receive harsher sentences, while in the AB group only 64% were of the same opinion. Last week the leading criminal barrister John Cooper QC warned that judges and magistrates had a duty “not to be influenced by angry Britain”, describing some of the sentences handed down already as “disproportionate and somewhat hysterical”. Senior Liberal Democrats also urged caution, opening up a rift in the coalition. The Lib Dem peer Lord Macdonald, who led the prosecution service in England and Wales for five years, warned that the courts risked being swept up in a “collective loss of proportion” , passing jail terms that lack “humanity or justice”. His fellow peer Lord Carlile, the barrister who was until this year the government’s independent adviser on terrorism strategy, warned against ministerial interference in the judicial process, arguing that “just filling up prisons” would not prevent future problems. The former party leader Sir Menzies Campbell said it was important that “political influence is not directed at the judicial system”. “With all due deference to the prime minister, politicians should not be either cheering or booing in the matter of sentencing,” he said. • ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,004 adults aged 18+ by telephone on 19-21 August 2011. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. UK riots Opinion polls Adam Gabbatt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libya: the battle for Tripoli – live updates

• Defiant Saif al-Islam Gaddafi appears in Tripoli • Hunt for Muammar Gaddafi continues • UN says more than 2,200 people killed in Syria crackdown 11.19am: Repressive regimes don’t all stick together – Bahrain has declared its recognition of Libya’s National Transitional Council. The kingdom’s state news agency said: In light of recent developments in Libya, the Kingdom of Bahrain reiterates its recognition of Libya’s Transitional National Council (TNC) as the sole legitimate representative of the brotherly Libyan people, wishes Libya to achieve prosperity, progress and stability, development and reconstruction. 11.08am: Sky News Alex Crawford describes “fierce fighting” outside Gaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziya compound, in this Audioboo clip. _ 10.55am: The international criminal court now denies that it ever confirmed Saif al-Islam had been arrested. A live blog by the Libyan activists Feb 17, quoted spokesman Fadi el-Abdallah, telling the BBC: What we said yesterday is that we received information about the arrest of Saif al-Islam and we were trying to confirm that by contacting the National Transitional Council in Libya, but Saif al-Islam Gaddafi was not under the custody of the ICC. The media was reporting about his arrest. We tried to contact different persons of the National Transitional Council and there were different opinions and different answers. That’s why we said there was no official confirmation about his arrest. The Guardian’s diplomatic editor Julian Borger tweets: Seif al-Islam episode is enormously embarrassing for the ICC . Still not clear what happened. #ICC #Libya 10.49am: Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu said the Nato campaign should continue until security full security is established. Speaking at a press conference in Benghazi he also said frozen Libya assets should be release soon to the Libyan opposition, Reuters reports. 10.38am: After chairing a meeting of the government’s National Security Council, Nick Clegg said the reappearance of Saif al-Islam was “not the sign of some great comeback” for the regime. Clegg said it was “only a matter of time” before Gaddafi’s regime in Libya was defeated. He said rebels controlled “much but not all of Tripoli”. The deputy prime minister chaired the meeting as David Cameron resumed his holiday in Cornwall . 10.27am: A boat charted by the International Organisation for Migrants to rescue 300 people stranded in Tripoli can’t dock because of the security situation. In phone interview IOM spokeswoman Jemini Pandya said: “We had been hoping to carry out the evacuation today. Unfortunately it [the boat] no longer has the security and safety guarantee it was given earlier. So as a result we will not dock the boat because it will not be safe for either our staff or the migrant to carry out the operation. What IOM will do however is keep the boat at sea until conditions improve. It is going to be an extremely difficult operation but we remain committed to carrying out.” Pandya said the IOM was keen to avoid _ 10.07am: Sky News’ Tripoli correspondent Alex Crawford confirms Luke’s reports of heavy fighting. Speaking to camera crouched behind a car, she described many casualties arriving at a hospital in central Tripoli. She also said supplies at the hospital were running low. Sky correspondent: Many casualties arriving at hospital in central Tripoli following intense fighting @AlexCrawfordSky Doctors seriously stretched in Tripoli’s only working hospital. Very few staff, piles of rubbish everywhere. 2 young children among wounded Sound of gunfire and shelling continues. Docs appeal for pressure on both sides to stop attacking the hospital. Horrendous conditions here 9.50am: After being interrupted by shelling Luke Harding in Tripoli resumes describing the battle for the city. Since we spoke more than 200 rebel vehicles have made a sedate cavalcade looping round the harbour and the old city, shooting and crying ‘God is great’ [heading] for the coastal road out west. It is not clear this is a retreat or a show of force. It is very hard to make sense of what is going on, but the battle is still going on as you can hear. I’m in the Corinthia hotel and it’s a bit like being in a reverberating amphitheatre. _ 9.28am: “I’ve got a front row stall seat on the battle,” Luke Harding reports above the crump of mortar shells in Tripoli. To my left is the old city which is in rebel hands – the rebels have got the harbour, the corniche, they’ve got Green Square. But to my right, where the fighting is going on, there are a series of tall government buildings where the rebels have taken up positions and they are now duking it out with Gaddafi forces in Bab al-Azizya, which is Gaddafi’s compound and the area where the Rixos hotel is situated. There is just a big battle going on [sound of shelling] that’s a big mortar. It is clear that the city is not in rebel hands, nor is it entirely in government hands. What we are looking at now is a Beirut-style situation. The west of city – the opposition have taken control of that – and the mood there is much calmer. But here in the heart of Tripoli there is this just this almighty fight. On the reappearance of Saif al-Islam, Luke said the it provided a psychological boost to loyalist fighters. But he added: “There isn’t anywhere for them to go from here. I can’t really see them recapturing the city. What I can envisage is them hanging on for some time, they have got a lot of ammunition, they’ve been expecting this, they’ve got heavy weaponry. Plus they’ve got all these captive journalists [in the Rixos hotel] …” At that point Luke had to cut the call short and take cover. _ 8.50am: Welcome to Middle East Live. It was reports of the arrest of Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam on Sunday night, confirmed by the international criminal court, which illustrated how close to collapse the Libyan regime had come. Saif’s defiant reappearance overnight suggests that the battle for Tripoli is far from over. “We are going to win” he said and asked about his indictment for war crimes he said: “Screw the criminal court.” _ Was Saif released as part of some kind of deal or did he escape? Waheed Burshan, a member of the National Transitional Council, told al-Jazeera: “We had confirmation Saif al-Islam was arrested, but we have no idea how he escaped.” Here are the other main developments: Libya • Opposition figure Ibrahim Sahad condemned the handling of another of Gaddafi’s sons, Mohammad, who also escaped on Monday. In an interview with the Australian broadcaster ABC, Sahad said: The way they dealt with Mohammed last night was not adequate… they wanted to show him the civilisation of this revolution. So they left him at home and they put some guards around the house, and the information now that he escaped. I mean this should not be done. It should be everybody from the Gaddafi family should be brought under arrest. • The head of the opposition National Transitional Council, Mustafa Abdel Jalil cautioned that “the real moment of victory is when Gaddafi is captured” . The Libyan leader’s whereabouts are still unknown, but US officials said they believed he was still in Libya. • Nato jets bombed Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli early on Tuesday, according to reports. Earlier, Nato said pro-Gaddafi forces fired at least three Scud missiles from the city of Sirte, Gaddafi’s birthplace. • Libyan state TV is off the air after its headquarters was stormed by rebels. Rebel forces also claimed to have detained Hala Misrati, the Libyan state TV prestenter who famously vowed to die a martyr for Gaddafi while waving a gun on air on Sunday. • Some international journalists remain trapped in Tripoli’s five-star Rixos hotel, in a part of the city controlled by Gaddafi’s forces. The hotel is subject to frequent power cuts. One of those reporters, the BBC’s Matthew Price, tweets: #Rixos Journos have little Internet access and trying to conserve power/sat phones etc. But all ok, feel safer this am, no power though. • The New York Times provides a detailed account of the rebel offensive on Tripoli which was combined with an uprising of residents. They were aided by steady supplies of weapons, fuel, medicine and food from British, French and Qatari troops and an escalated bombing campaign by NATO jets and American Predator drones. Hundreds of rebels took part in secret military training inside Qatar. Rebel forces even advanced on Tripoli by boat, arranging a flotilla from the town of Misurata in an operation the rebels called Mermaid Dawn … The western offensive by the rebels galvanized opposition fighters in other parts of the country. American and NATO officials described a carefully coordinated three-pronged push on Tripoli, to drive fighters loyal to Colonel Qaddafi on the roads back toward the capital where NATO planes could bomb them. That push, concentrated to the west of Tripoli, was coordinated with the uprising on Saturday within Tripoli itself. • The hard part starts now , Martin Chulov, the Guardian’s former Baghdad correspondent, warns in an analysis of what the various rebels factions do now. The lessons of what becomes of a Middle East state that suddenly loses its strongman are recent and raw. More than eight years after Baghdad fell with the same ignominious haste as Tripoli, it remains a basket case of competing agendas, a disengaged political class and citizens left with the reality that the state neither has the capacity or the will to look after them. • The speed of the collapse of the Gaddafi regime presents serious problems, agues Daniel Serwer from the Johns Hopkins School of Advance International Studies. Speaking on Bloggingheads TV, Serwer said: “Had I been an active diplomat in this I would have worked very hard to try to get a formal turnover of power, because that’s what prevents the kind of stay-behind rebellion that we suffered in Iraq.” Syria • More than 2,200 people have been killed in the Syrian government’s crackdown on protests , the UN’s human rights commissioner Navi Pillay said as she condemned a shoot-to-kill policy by the regime. While demonstrations have been largely peaceful, the military and security forces have resorted to an apparent “shoot-to-kill” policy. Snipers on rooftops have targeted protesters, bystanders who were trying to help the wounded, and ambulances … As of today, over 2200 people have been killed since mass protests began in mid-March, with more than 350 people reportedly killed across Syria since the beginning of Ramadan. The military and security forces continue to employ excessive force, including heavy artillery, to quell peaceful demonstrations and regain control over the residents of various cities, particularly in Hama, Homs, Latakia and Deir Ezzor. The heavy shelling of al-Ramel Palestinian refugee camp in Latakia last week resulted in at least 4 people killed and the displacement of the 7,500 inhabitants of the camp. Despite assurances from President Assad to the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon on Wednesday that military operations had finished, I regret to note that at least five people were killed around the country on Thursday and 34 more on Friday by Syrian military and security forces. • The Syrian government’s attempts to whitewash evidence of a brutal crackdown on the country’s five-month uprising appeared to backfire on Monday after a visiting UN humanitarian delegation was met by protesters waving SOS signs . Hundreds of demonstrators in Homs surrounded the UN car in the central New Clock square, shouting for the overthrow of the regime. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Syria Bashar Al-Assad Matthew Weaver guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Music Monday: The Weeknd’s Sinful Sounds

So far, 2011 has been a good year for The Weeknd. The previously unknown Canadian R&B singer released a nine-song mixtape House of Balloons through his own website in March, earned public praise from Drake, and was nominated for a 2011 Polaris Music Prize. Last week he followed up with a second mixtape, Thursday. Now

Continue reading …
Bill Burton Rips Karl Rove’s Lecture on ‘Good Governance’

Click here to view this media Former White House spokesman Bill Burton called out Karl Rove Sunday for lecturing about President Barack Obama’s economic record when former President George W. Bush squandered a record budget surplus. “[Republicans] won the House and since that time they have done nothing to produce jobs and put nothing forward to partner with the president to create jobs and move this economy in the right direction,” Burton explained to Fox News’ Brett Baier. “Karl, At the GOP debate in Iowa, I asked all the candidates the question, whether would accept this deal in which Democrats agreed to $10 in real spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases,” Baier told Rove. “And every single hand on the stage went up, saying they would walk away from that deal, opposing any tax increases… When Democrats complain about idealogical rigidity in the moderate republican party do they have a point? ” “Bret, with all due respect, that was a lousy question for a debate,” Rove charged. “Let’s set the record straight. There is rigidity in the political system and it starts with the president of the United States… I love it. The Republicans passed a budget, the Democrats in the Senate haven’t. The Republicans have passed a slew of job creating measures, and the Democrats in the Senate haven’t. And the president now sits here and lectures us about how we need to take action. What is his action? He has yet to put pen to paper and issue a jobs plan or a deficit reduction plan in the last nine months. So, please don’t talk to me about ideological rigidity. It comes from the White House.” “I appreciate that you have an opinion on this, Karl,” Burton shot back. “But as someone who was a leader in the White House that turned a record surplus into a deficit, that got us involved in a war that we never should have been in, and turned the floor of the New York stock exchange into a casino, I don’t think the American people are quite ready to hear a lecture from you on good governance.” “What the president needs in Washington are partners who will work with him to make progress in this country, not just people like Eric Cantor and John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, who would much rather see the economy do poorly so that they can score political points than see America succeed,” he added. “Bill, with all due respect, do not question the motivations and integrity of the people on the other side,” Rove said. “I don’t think all due respect means what you think it means,” Burton pointed out. Transcript below the fold. BAIER: Hey, Karl, at the GOP debate in Iowa, I asked all the candidates the question, whether they would accept this deal in which Democrats agreed to $10 in real spending cuts for $1 in tax increases. Every single hand on the stage went up, saying they would walk away from that deal, opposing any tax increases. Now, I was expecting some of them to push back and to ask for time for a nuanced answer. They didn’t. There was no push back. So, when Democrats complain about ideological rigidity or stubbornness in the modern Republican Party, do they have a point? ROVE: Well, look, first, with due respect to your question, that was a question that had a predictable answer to it, and that kind of a thing when you’re asking people to raise their hand and not offering them a chance to get a nuance answer, you’re going to get raising hands. Let me go back to what Bill said — BAIER: Wait a second. Hold on. I mean, we gave them the opportunity, Karl. You know, so I mean — ROVE: With all due respect — Bret, with all due respect, that was lousy question for a debate. And if you wanted a better answer, ask that question to candidates individually. BURTON: These guys wanted to be president of the United States. They can’t talk to Bret Baier about what their vision is, or how to deal with the economy? ROVE: Let’s set the record — let’s set the record straight about what Bill said earlier about rigidity. Yes, there’s rigidity in our political system and it starts with the president of the United States. Republicans had ideas to try and make stimulus bill better. And in a meeting in the White House, maybe Bill was even in the room. President Obama dismissed Eric Cantors’ suggestions about how to make the bill better by saying, “I won.” This president had a Democrat Congress, I repeat, by overwhelming margin for two years and got everything he wanted. Now, what have the Republicans done this year? The Republicans have insisted that — the president set up political battle. He had the votes in November and December of last year to get his, quote, “clean debt” ceiling. But instead, he said he wanted the Republicans to, quote, “have ownership” in the deficit. So, he waited until there is a Republican House and then tried to jam them, insisting on a clean debt ceiling. The Republicans said we want to have deficit reduction before we vote for an increase in the debt ceiling. They got it. The president applauded that bill and signed it. So, you know, I love it. The Republicans passed a budget. The Democrats in the Senate haven’t. The Republicans have passed a slew of job creating measures and the Democrats in the Senate haven’t. And the president now sits here and lectures us about how we need to take action. Well, what is his action? He has yet put pen to paper and issue a jobs plan or a deficit reduction plan in the last nine months. BURTON: You know, Karl –ROVE: So, please, don’t talk (ph) to me about ideological rigidity. It came from your White House. (CROSSTALK) BURTON: — but as someone who is a leader in the White House that turned a record surplus into a deficit that got us involved in a war that we never shouldn’t have been in and turned the floor of the New York Stock Exchange into a casino, I don’t think the American people are quite ready to hear a lecture from you on good governance.

Continue reading …