Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 3)
Disneyland Attractions Contain High Levels Of Lead, Environmental Group Alleges

What are the scariest attractions at Disneyland? It may not be the roller-coasters, if an environmental group’s accusations are well-founded. The Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation filed an injunction last week that would require the Anaheim, Calfornia park to post warning signs or cover surfaces found to contain lead. According to the Los Angeles Times, Mateel had filed a lawsuit in Orange County court in April, alleging “excessive levels of lead in such commonly touched objects as the Sword in the Stone attraction,” along with brass door knobs at Minnie’s House, stained-glass windows in a door at the entrance to a beauty salon in Cinderella’s Castle” and several other locations. Last year, Mateel sent individuals to conduct “wipe testing” of various surfaces at Disneyland. They found that a number of surfaces contained many more times the amount of lead than that which requires a posted sign. According to the International Business Times, signs are required when “average exposure exceeds 0.5 micrograms per day.” Disney has claimed that they have posted warning signs and are not violating California law. A Disney spokeswoman told the Los Angeles Times, “We have not seen the papers that we are told are being filed, so we cannot comment specifically. However, we believe that Disneyland Resort is in full compliance with the signage requirements.” The research director at the Center For Environmental Health said in a press release, “It’s disappointing that a $38 billion company like Disney can’t be bothered to clean up their parks so they’re safe for children. We’re telling our supporters to send a message to Disney today: there is no place for lead poisoning at the world’s happiest place.” Lead is on the list of chemicals covered by California’s 1986 Proposition 65 that requires the labeling of products or places that contain “chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.” According to health experts, lead poisoning occurs when individuals’ blood contains 10 micrograms per deciliter. This week is the CDC’s National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week. The CDC reported this summer that lead poisoning among American adults has dropped by over 50 percent in the past 15 years. Read The Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation’s “Danger at Disneyland: Lead Hazards At The Happiest Place On Earth” here.

Continue reading …
Networks and Cable Still Mostly Silent on Anti-Semitism at Occupy Wall Street Protests

Journalistic outlets, which were all too eager to accuse the Tea Party of bigotry, have been mostly silent in response to examples of anti-Semitism at the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protests. Incidents caught on tape and the urging of the Anti-Defamation League to stop anti-Jewish bigotry have yielded very little coverage. Since October 1st, a Nexis search reveals no discussion of anti-Semitism at the protests on ABC, CBS, NBC or during the prime time lineup of CNN and MSNBC. This is despite incidents of anti-Jewish comments at rallies in places such as New York and Los Angeles. At one L.A. protest, now-fired teacher Patricia McAllister complained, “I think that the Zionist Jews who are running these big banks and our Federal Reserve, which is not run by the federal government — they need to be run out of this country.” (The L.A. Times covered this story.) In New York , another protester derided, “So, the hatred of the Arabs towards Israel is understandable.” Although prime time MSNBC has failed to cover such incidents of hate, daytime anchor Martin Bashir did. On October 18 , he pressed activist Russell Simmons and played a commercial from a Jewish organization attacking the hate. In that clip, a man can be seen screaming, “You're a bum, Jew!” The New York Times on Saturday discussed and dismissed anti-Semitism at the rallies. Clay Waters of Times Watch explained: While the New York Times was hypersensitive to any signs of racial prejudice among the massive, peaceful Tea Party protests, reporter Joseph Berger raised and dismissed the idea of anti-Semitism at Occupy Wall Street, in Saturday’s “Cries of Anti-Semitism, But Not at Zuccotti Park.” Just two of many references: Reporter David Herszenhorn assumed racism was a force in the movement in an April

Continue reading …
Stay-at-home dads on the up: one in seven fathers are main childcarers

Study by Aviva shows that more than a quarter of dads gave up work or reduced their hours after the birth of their children There are now 10 times as many stay-at-home dads in the UK than a decade ago, with one in seven fathers (14%) now the main childcare provider, according to research from Aviva. It says about 1.4 million men are now the primary carer in their households. The study suggests that a quarter of families with children under 18 share childcare equally, up from 18% in 2010, while more than a quarter of dads (26%) gave up work or reduced their working hours after the birth of their children, and 44% regularly look after the children while their partner works. Close to half of stay-at-home-dads (43%) told Aviva they felt “lucky” to have the opportunity to spend more time with their kids, but 46% of families said their decision allowed the main earner to keep working. The trend for increasing numbers of stay-at-home dads has been driven by growing numbers of women earning more than their partner – a quarter of women said they now earn more than their children’s father, while a further 16% said they earn roughly the same as their partner. But men told Aviva they had had difficulties in assuming primary responsibility for children, with nearly one in five (17%) admitting it makes them feel “less of a man”, 13% claiming they found looking after the children harder than going out to work, and 13% saying they wished they earned more than their partner so they could go back to work. Louise Colley, head of protection marketing for Aviva, said: “It is really interesting to see how the responsibilities of parents are shifting. There is no longer a ‘norm’ for who does what in a family relationship, and it’s great that many mums and dads are enjoying non-traditional roles. “We know from our latest Family Finances report that the cost of childcare means many families feel it’s not worthwhile both parents working – so it’s no surprise to see more men taking up the reins. “However, this also means that many families are relying on one salary, which can leave them financially vulnerable.” Justine Roberts, co-founder of Mumsnet , said the survey failed to highlight the struggles facing many women who choose to return to work. “In our experience, women still pick up the bulk of the domestic duties in the house – even when both parents are working. “It is great that men are getting more involved with the kids, but there’s still a big divide on other activities with women doing more cooking, reading with kids, activity planning, and homework to name a few, which is why we see so many women still struggling to balance a successful career with family life.” Childcare Family finances Children Parents Parents and parenting Family Gender Mark King guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

In January, the Senate Tea Party Caucus was in full swing, holding a meeting on Capitol Hill—but neither that group nor its House counterpart have done much of anything since. Though a leader of the Senate caucus points out that “it’s only been nine months,” the group’s members seem…

Continue reading …
NYT Denies Broad Anti-Semitism at OWS; Quick to See Racism at Tea Party Rallies

While the New York Times was hypersensitive to any signs of racial prejudice among the massive, peaceful Tea Party protests, reporter Joseph Berger raised and dismissed the idea of anti-Semitism at Occupy Wall Street, in Saturday’s “ Cries of Anti-Semitism, But Not at Zuccotti Park .” Just two of many references: Reporter David Herszenhorn assumed racism was a force in the movement in an April

Continue reading …

Clear air shouldn’t be a political issue. But in New Jersey, home to many deep-pocket pharmaceutical- and chemical-company political contributors, of course it is! Via email: Environment New Jersey announced a major online clean air accountability campaign, targeting three of New Jersey’s more moderate Republican Congressman, including Rep. Leonard Lance (R-7), Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-2) and Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-11), for three recent votes that threaten public health by undermining clean air and allowing more air pollution. “Everyone should be able to breathe clean air, but this bill puts tens of thousands of lives at risk by blocking the clean-up of deadly air pollution,” said Doug O’Malley, field director for Environment New Jersey. “We want to let New Jersey voters know their Congressman supported out-of-state polluters instead of standing up for New Jersey’s health. New Jerseyans deserve better.” The size of the online media purchase is described as a significant 5-figure buy and is targeting the state’s largest web-sites – including nj.com – with banners targeting hometown voters in all major newspapers, a homepage takeover of PolitickerNJ, sponsorship of the “Wake Up Call” e-mail newsletter and targeted Google ads. Ads will be running for a week. The House of Representatives approved the “TRAIN” Act, which would indefinitely delay the clean-up of toxic power plant pollution; another bill (H.R. 2681) that prevents clean air standards that lower mercury and other toxic air pollution from cement plants; and a bill (H.R. 2250) that would prevents standards to reduce toxic pollution from industrial incinerators and boilers at power plants. The “TRAIN” Act alone, if passed, could result in 139,500 lives lost due to smog, soot, and toxic air pollution.* In New Jersey, it could result in over 3,200 lives lost due to air pollution. The health benefits delivered by the incinerator and boiler standards are as high as $54 billion annually, and the health benefits from cement standards will be as high as $18 billion annually. All of these bills were voted on the heels of an Environment New Jersey report, “Danger in the Air,” that found New Jersey’s air to be some of the smoggiest in the country. The findings included that the North Jersey metropolitan area, including New York and Connecticut, ranked as the 5th smoggiest metropolitan area in the country this past summer. Findings from 2010 were equally alarming. Rep. Frank LoBiondo’s district, (R-2), includes much of South Jersey, including the Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton area which ranked as the 7th smoggiest small metropolitan area in the country. Rep. Leonard Lance’s district, (R-7), which stretches across central Jersey, including Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon Counties which ranked the 17th worst smoggiest in the country, with 17 smog alert days. “Clean air should not be a partisan issue – especially when these standards will clean up out-of-state power plants. The votes by these moderate Congressmen are more than disappointing – their decision sides with polluters over our public health – and we want to let as many New Jerseyans’ know where these Congressmen stand,” said O’Malley.

Continue reading …
EU referendum vote is wrong question at wrong time, says Hague

Foreign secretary speaks out as Commons prepares to debate motion calling for referendum of UK’s relationship with EU William Hague, has told backbench Eurosceptics that Monday’s Commons vote on pulling out of Europe “is the wrong question at the wrong time”. The foreign secretary spoke out as David Cameron faced the most serious challenge to his authority since taking office. A large number of Conservative MPs are reportedly planning to rebel on the Commons motion, which calls for a referendum on the UK’s relationship with the EU. Cameron will meet parliamentary aides in Downing Street before the vote in an attempt to dissuade as many as 10 members of the government who are minded to rebel against the prime minister, requiring them to resign their posts. The coalition is sticking to its decision to impose a three-line whip on MPs to vote against the motion, despite criticism that it has been too heavy-handed. The motion calls for a nationwide referendum on whether Britain should leave the EU, renegotiate its treaty with Brussels, or remain a member on the current terms. The government will not suffer a defeat because Labour and the Lib Dems will vote down the motion, but a sizeable group of Conservative believes Cameron should honour pledges once made to allow a national vote on Britain’s relationship with Europe. They are calling for the repatriation of social and employment rights. Hague – formerly one of the Tory party’s most high-profile Eurosceptics – defended the leadership’s decision to impose a three-line whip on the grounds that the motion being debated was “completely against the policy of the government”. “This proposition is the wrong question at the wrong time. It was not in the manifesto of either of the governing parties,” he said. “The whole relationship with the European Union is a matter that concerns the government … it is not just something for the House of Commons to put up some graffiti about.” He said an in/out referendum was not the right idea, adding: “I have argued for more referendums than almost anybody else, and I have argued against the euro more comprehensively than almost anybody else, but this proposition … cuts right across the rules for holding referendums that we have just agreed by large majorities. It would create additional economic uncertainty in this country. “The right referendum is that, whenever any government suggests handing more power from Britain to the EU, the British people are consulted – that is the right policy.” The Liberal Democrats do not support the repatriation of powers from Brussels, and the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, issued a statement warning that it was “far too early to speculate” about what the government’s position would be in the event of any moves to change EU treaties. Simon Hughes, the Lib Dem party leader, told Sky News: “I don’t think suddenly getting into a debate about whether or not we should be in the European Union, where we do half our business, is the right thing to do. “I believe that if we have the debate in the future, if the occasion comes up when there is a proposal to transfer powers, that the people, after the debate, will say yes again. “Now, there is an issue about whether the balance of powers is correct but nobody stood on a platform of having a referendum immediately now, just out of the blue. Certainly we didn’t.” The Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin told BBC Breakfast the EU referendum debate was “basically about democracy”. Jenkin, who is in favour of renegotiation rather than leaving the EU, denied the timing for a referendum was poor and said the call was in tune with the wider public. “When even John Major [the former Conservative prime minister who signed the Maastricht Treaty] is saying now is the moment for us to use our leverage to get powers back top the European Union, it would seem a good time,” he said. “Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a treaty coming down the track to hang a referendum on, so we haven’t got that leverage. This would be an opening shot consultative referendum, to ask the British people about what the dilemma facing this country is. Do we stay in and carry on as now? Do we get out completely, or as the majority of polls show people want, renegotiate our relationship? “I’m sorry about that, but I think the vast majority of MPs know in their hearts there should be a referendum.” But David Lidington, the Conservative minister for Europe, said that, for the wider British public, an EU referendum is “the last thing on their minds”. “I’ve had some identically worded campaign letters from constituents calling for a referendum,” he told Breakfast News. “When I go around the constituency at political and non-political events, this is the last thing on their minds. “What they are worried about are how their school-leaver or graduate children are going to get jobs; they’re worried about the future of public services; they’re concerned about crime and about the welfare system. They want the government to sort out those problems, particularly the challenges as regards employment.” The UK Independence party leaderNigel Farage, said it was fascinating to watch the Conservatives “tear themselves apart over this”. “Polls over the last few days have clearly shown that the general public believe MPs should be able to vote how they like regarding an EU referendum,” the MEP said. “I urge all MPs across the parties to vote with their conscience ahead of their party or career. It is the least the British people deserve.” Cameron attempted to take some of the heat out of the rebellion at the EU summit in Brussels on Sunday. He used a press conference to appeal directly to potential rebels, talking up the chance of repatriating powers with the “possibility” of treaty change coming onto the agenda as early as December as the euro countries push towards fiscal integration. The prime minister said he had proved his ability to exact a good price when he agreed an EU treaty change that created a new mechanism for bailing out troubled eurozone countries but exempted Britain from having to pay for bailouts from 2013. It is not clear whether this would trigger the government’s stated commitment to a referendum because it is due to stage a vote only if new powers are transferred from Westminster to Brussels, and any change by Cameron would be likely to do the reverse. At the summit, Cameron became embroiled in a row with the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy , over Britain’s role in talks to solve the crisis enveloping the euro. Sarkozy apparently told the British prime minister to “shut up” and said he was fed up with him criticising the eurozone countries “and telling us what to do”. William Hague David Cameron Foreign policy Conservatives Liberal-Conservative coalition Labour Liberal Democrats Nick Clegg Simon Hughes UK Independence party (Ukip) European Union Nigel Farage Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Over A Third Of Americans Support Occupy Wall Street Protests: Poll [LIVE UPDATES]

By Laurie Kellman, Associated Press WASHINGTON — More than one-third of the country supports the Wall Street protests, and even more – 58 percent – say they are furious about America’s politics. The number of angry people is growing as deep reservoirs of resentment grip the country, according to the latest Associated Press-GfK poll. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES) Some 37 percent of people back the protests that have spread from New York to cities across the country and abroad, one of the first snapshots of how the public views the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. A majority of those protest supporters are Democrats, but the anger about politics in general is much more widespread, the poll indicates. “They’ve got reasons to be upset, they’ve got reasons to protest, but they’re protesting against the wrong people,” Jan Jarrell, 54, a retired school custodian from Leesville, S.C., says of the New York demonstrators. “They need to go to Washington, to Congress and the White House. They’re the ones coming up with all the rules.” “Occupy Wall Street” has been called the liberal counterpoint to conservative-libertarian tea party, which injected a huge dose of enthusiasm into the Republican Party and helped it win the House and make gains in the Senate last fall. While the troubled economy is at the root of anger at both government and business leaders, there’s a key difference. Tea party activists generally argue that government is the problem, and they advocate for free markets. The Wall Street protesters generally say that government can provide some solutions and the free market has run amok. Of the Americans who support the Wall Street protests, 64 percent in the poll are Democrats, while 22 percent are independents and just 14 percent are Republicans. The protest backers are more likely to approve of President Barack Obama and more likely to disapprove of Congress than are people who don’t support the demonstrations. More generally, many more Americans – 58 percent – say they are furious about the country’s politics than did in January, when 49 percent said they felt that way. What’s more, nearly nine in 10 say they are frustrated with politics and nearly the same say they are disappointed, findings that suggest people are deeply resentful of the political bickering over such basic government responsibilities as passing a federal budget and raising the nation’s debt limit. This wrath spreads across political lines, with about six in 10 Democrats, Republicans and independents saying politics makes them angry. Fewer are hopeful about politics than when the year began, 47 percent down from 60 percent. Only 17 percent of respondents say they feel proud or inspired. Since January, Congress and the White House have engaged in repeated standoffs over federal spending and the size of government as the economy has struggled to recover from recession. In the past month, fury over all that has spilled into New York’s financial district, and groups of mostly young people have camped out in a park. The protesters cite the economic crisis as a key reason for their unhappiness. The unemployment rate hovers around 9 percent nationally. Many homeowners owe more than their homes are worth. Foreclosures are rampant. And many young people – the key demographic of the protesters – can’t find jobs or live on their own. Alexandria, Va., resident Alice Dunlap said she was stunned at a 2009 family reunion to find that more than half of her four children and their spouses were out of work. “They all have college educations, and some have advanced degrees, and they’re unemployed?” says Dunlap, 62, a retired speech language pathologist. She supports the protests because, she says, anger lingers at those who profited while the nation’s economy tanked. “We all got ripped off by Wall Street, and we continue to be ripped off by Wall Street,” she says. “You can look at my portfolio, if you like.” The poll found that most protest supporters do not blame Obama for the economic crisis. Sixty-eight percent say former President George W. Bush deserves “almost all” or “a lot but not all” of the blame. Just 15 percent say Obama deserves that much blame. Nearly six in 10 protest supporters blame Republicans in Congress for the nation’s economic problems, and 21 percent blame congressional Democrats. Six in 10 protest supporters trust Democrats more than Republicans to create jobs. Most people who support the protests – like most people who don’t – actually report good financial situations in their own households. Still, protest supporters express more intense concern than non-supporters about unemployment at the moment and rising consumer prices in the coming year. Norton Shores, Mich., retiree Patsy Ellerbroek, 65, is among those who have little empathy for the Wall Street protesters. “Everybody ought to own their own business before they start complaining,” Ellerbroek says. Eight years ago, she and her husband sold “The Fun Spot,” a roller rink they owned for three decades. Now she’s a member of neither political party, and she gets frustrated when she sees politicians like the Republican candidates for president being disrespectful. Or Obama “flying around the county on our taxpayer dollars, politicking.” “With all the politicians, it’s like, the heck with the people who put them there. We need another Mr. Smith goes to Washington,” she said. The poll was conducted Oct. 13-17, 2011, by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,000 adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The poll included 384 respondents who said they were supporters of the Wall Street protests. Among that group, the error margin was 6.5 points. If you’ve been to an Occupy Wall Street event anywhere in the country, we’d like to hear from you. Send OfftheBus your photos, links to videos or first-hand accounts of what you’ve seen for possible inclusion in The Huffington Posts’s coverage at offthebus@huffingtonpost.com. If you would like to sign up to be a citizen journalist through OfftheBus, sign up at offthebus.org.

Continue reading …
Over A Third Of Americans Support Occupy Wall Street Protests: Poll [LIVE UPDATES]

By Laurie Kellman, Associated Press WASHINGTON — More than one-third of the country supports the Wall Street protests, and even more – 58 percent – say they are furious about America’s politics. The number of angry people is growing as deep reservoirs of resentment grip the country, according to the latest Associated Press-GfK poll. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES) Some 37 percent of people back the protests that have spread from New York to cities across the country and abroad, one of the first snapshots of how the public views the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. A majority of those protest supporters are Democrats, but the anger about politics in general is much more widespread, the poll indicates. “They’ve got reasons to be upset, they’ve got reasons to protest, but they’re protesting against the wrong people,” Jan Jarrell, 54, a retired school custodian from Leesville, S.C., says of the New York demonstrators. “They need to go to Washington, to Congress and the White House. They’re the ones coming up with all the rules.” “Occupy Wall Street” has been called the liberal counterpoint to conservative-libertarian tea party, which injected a huge dose of enthusiasm into the Republican Party and helped it win the House and make gains in the Senate last fall. While the troubled economy is at the root of anger at both government and business leaders, there’s a key difference. Tea party activists generally argue that government is the problem, and they advocate for free markets. The Wall Street protesters generally say that government can provide some solutions and the free market has run amok. Of the Americans who support the Wall Street protests, 64 percent in the poll are Democrats, while 22 percent are independents and just 14 percent are Republicans. The protest backers are more likely to approve of President Barack Obama and more likely to disapprove of Congress than are people who don’t support the demonstrations. More generally, many more Americans – 58 percent – say they are furious about the country’s politics than did in January, when 49 percent said they felt that way. What’s more, nearly nine in 10 say they are frustrated with politics and nearly the same say they are disappointed, findings that suggest people are deeply resentful of the political bickering over such basic government responsibilities as passing a federal budget and raising the nation’s debt limit. This wrath spreads across political lines, with about six in 10 Democrats, Republicans and independents saying politics makes them angry. Fewer are hopeful about politics than when the year began, 47 percent down from 60 percent. Only 17 percent of respondents say they feel proud or inspired. Since January, Congress and the White House have engaged in repeated standoffs over federal spending and the size of government as the economy has struggled to recover from recession. In the past month, fury over all that has spilled into New York’s financial district, and groups of mostly young people have camped out in a park. The protesters cite the economic crisis as a key reason for their unhappiness. The unemployment rate hovers around 9 percent nationally. Many homeowners owe more than their homes are worth. Foreclosures are rampant. And many young people – the key demographic of the protesters – can’t find jobs or live on their own. Alexandria, Va., resident Alice Dunlap said she was stunned at a 2009 family reunion to find that more than half of her four children and their spouses were out of work. “They all have college educations, and some have advanced degrees, and they’re unemployed?” says Dunlap, 62, a retired speech language pathologist. She supports the protests because, she says, anger lingers at those who profited while the nation’s economy tanked. “We all got ripped off by Wall Street, and we continue to be ripped off by Wall Street,” she says. “You can look at my portfolio, if you like.” The poll found that most protest supporters do not blame Obama for the economic crisis. Sixty-eight percent say former President George W. Bush deserves “almost all” or “a lot but not all” of the blame. Just 15 percent say Obama deserves that much blame. Nearly six in 10 protest supporters blame Republicans in Congress for the nation’s economic problems, and 21 percent blame congressional Democrats. Six in 10 protest supporters trust Democrats more than Republicans to create jobs. Most people who support the protests – like most people who don’t – actually report good financial situations in their own households. Still, protest supporters express more intense concern than non-supporters about unemployment at the moment and rising consumer prices in the coming year. Norton Shores, Mich., retiree Patsy Ellerbroek, 65, is among those who have little empathy for the Wall Street protesters. “Everybody ought to own their own business before they start complaining,” Ellerbroek says. Eight years ago, she and her husband sold “The Fun Spot,” a roller rink they owned for three decades. Now she’s a member of neither political party, and she gets frustrated when she sees politicians like the Republican candidates for president being disrespectful. Or Obama “flying around the county on our taxpayer dollars, politicking.” “With all the politicians, it’s like, the heck with the people who put them there. We need another Mr. Smith goes to Washington,” she said. The poll was conducted Oct. 13-17, 2011, by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,000 adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The poll included 384 respondents who said they were supporters of the Wall Street protests. Among that group, the error margin was 6.5 points. If you’ve been to an Occupy Wall Street event anywhere in the country, we’d like to hear from you. Send OfftheBus your photos, links to videos or first-hand accounts of what you’ve seen for possible inclusion in The Huffington Posts’s coverage at offthebus@huffingtonpost.com. If you would like to sign up to be a citizen journalist through OfftheBus, sign up at offthebus.org.

Continue reading …
Legal aid cuts will put domestic abuse victims at risk, law groups warn

More children and partners likely to be cross-examined in court by alleged assailants, Manifesto for Family Justice claims An increasing number of victims of domestic abuse, including children, will be cross-examined in court by their alleged assailants if the government goes ahead with plans to cut legal aid, a coalition of family and children’s charities has warned. In a manifesto sent to all MPs, the group – which includes the Bar Council, the children’s commissioner, Liberty, Women’s Aid and Gingerbread – calls on ministers to protect vulnerable children and partners in divorce and family proceedings. The legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders bill, which will save £350m a year from the legal aid budget, has completed its committee stage in the Commons and will be debated on the floor of the house next week. The justice secretary, Ken Clarke, has said he wants to do away with “compensation culture”. Restrictions are being imposed on access to legal aid in divorce and family proceedings. The Ministry of Justice has said legal aid will be preserved for those who suffer violence and psychological abuse in domestic disputes. Family charities and the legal profession claim the definition remains too narrow and that alleged perpetrators will not be entitled to legal representation, resulting in many conducting personal cross-examinations. This already happens on rare occasions but is likely to become far more widespread under the proposed reforms, according to the Manifesto for Family Justice. Stephen Cobb QC, chairman of the Family Law Bar Association, said: “We will see an increasing number of people going to court on their own without representation. “That is DIY justice, not access to justice. We face the very real prospect that many children and women who have been victims of domestic abuse will have to endure the further trauma of being cross-examined by their alleged perpetrator, who will not be eligible for legal aid. “We are facing a disturbing new landscape in which 600,000 people will no longer receive legal aid, 68,000 children will be affected by the removal of legal aid in family cases, 54,000 fewer people will be represented in the family courts annually and there will be 75% fewer private law cases in court. “When the government consulted on these proposals, virtually no one supported them. The civil legal aid cuts will be bad for children, bad for women and bad for families.” The Bar Council represents barristers in England and Wales. The manifesto states that the “narrow definition of domestic abuse [used in the bill] is more restrictive than that used by the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers and will limit legal aid to victims of certain types of abuse”. Itsuggests that because of problems likely to be created for the courts, the government may not save money and could even be faced with increased costs. Fiona Dwyer from Women’s Aid said: “A lot of people will end up being cross-examined by their ex-partner. We have increasing evidence of that, but it’s going to be much worse in future if men are not going to be able to access legal aid. “Women are going to be pressurised into making informal arrangements which will place them at risk of harm. We would be concerned that more children would be at risk.” Jane Wilson of Resolution, which represents family lawyers, said: “We are really worried that the bill will reduce access to justice for the poorest in society.” Other signatories of the manifesto include the Association of Lawyers for Children, Co-ordinated Action Against Domestic Abuse, and the National Federation of Women’s Institutes. Domestic violence Legal aid Family law UK criminal justice Kenneth Clarke Charities Voluntary sector Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …