By Eugene Robinson Amid the wreckage of Tuesday’s GOP rampage, there’s one person for whom I feel awful: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She’s losing her job not because she does it poorly but because she does it so well. Related Entries November 5, 2010 From Uprising to Hostile Takeover … and Back Again November 4, 2010 Obama Calls Bipartisan Power Meeting
Continue reading …At least the few that are left : An elder statesman of the moderate Blue Dog Coalition is calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to step down from party leadership after a historic election in which she presided over the loss of 60 seats and control of the House. Utah Rep. Jim Matheson, a co-chair of the Blue Dogs, told POLITICO Thursday that Pelosi should not be a candidate for minority leader – a sign that other Blue Dogs are ready to pounce if Pelosi doesn’t voluntarily cede her power. “No,” Matheson said flatly when asked if Pelosi should seek the job. “We just got whupped.” Matheson, one of a handful of Democrats who still represent districts that backed John McCain in the 2008 presidential election, said he does not have a favorite candidate in mind to support for minority leader. But he contends that Pelosi is no longer in position to lead the party. “I’m just suggesting that when you have the largest turnover since 1948 then it’s time to shake things up,” said Matheson, who watched as more than half of the Blue Dog districts flipped into Republican hands on Tuesday night. I heard on the radio today the Heath Schuler, another Blue Dog, has announced a challenge to Pelosi for Minority Leader. Frankly, I’ll be surprised if she doesn’t retire from Congress altogether. That’s what usually happens when a Speaker is ousted. If the Dems are smart (and when was the last time that happened?) they’d flush the entire leadership and start over.
Continue reading …Getting shellacked in the midterm elections has evidently motivated President Barack Obama to consider his strategy for the next two years, and he’s taking the bold new step of—wait for it—arranging a group huddle with eight big players from the two dominant parties. Sigh.
Continue reading …President Obama is inviting Republican and Democratic congressional leaders to meet with him on the economy and jobs. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says he expects the Nov. 18 meeting to be the first of many. (Nov. 4)
Continue reading …Next year will be a year unlike any other for the stock market. The Republican takeover of the House of Representatives means Wall Street will be contending with three situations that will drive stock prices. (Nov. 4)
Continue reading …A ground-breaking retinal implant has allowed three people to see shapes and objects for the first time since they lost their sight to an inherited an eye disease. (Nov. 4)
Continue reading …click our link hotnewss.com – to watch full “Matt Hughes Storm Chaser Death NOT From Storm Chasing (VIDEO)” exclusive video!! Matt Hughes, the seemingly fearless “storm chaser” in the famous Discovery Channel show has shocked the whole meteorological world (and everything related, in any way, to it) by the news of his death last May 26. Although a lot of speculations have risen concerning the death of the Dog House vehicle operator, sources close to Hughes emphatically say that it does not have anything to do with his penchant for chasing storms. Hughes was said to have suffered from a ton of emotional problems and issues that ultimately led to his demise. Suicide, among other things, has been mentioned, too. matt hughes storm chaser death, how did matt hughes storm chaser die, how did matt hughes die, matt hughes storm chaser, matt hughes, matt hughes death
Continue reading …The scariest guy Obama will have to face in the next two years won’t be John Boehner or Eric Cantor, but Darryl Issa, a Southern California congressman who will have a host of new powers : Here are the top three ways Washington will be different after this week’s midterm elections: First, President Obama will have to go through John Boehner and Co. to pass any bill. Second, Republicans will be held politically accountable for their actions in a way they haven’t been during their years in the minority. And third, Rep. Darrell Issa and his fellow GOP committee chairmen in the House will have subpoena power come January. What exactly does that mean? A congressional subpoena allows House committees to compel the administration and any federal agency to produce documents or testimony related to a broadly-defined “legislative purpose.” Courts have rarely interfered with this privilege and presidential administrations don’t often fight it. Subpoena power, in other words, means that Issa, who will soon be the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, can legally compel the Obama administration to hand over virtually any document it has. Issa is downplaying his new role, telling reporters, “My job is to make the president a success” by helping him eliminate waste and abuse in the executive branch. He is also talking up a series of relatively benign subjects as his top priorities heading into the next Congress: continuing oversight of the FDA’s food safety regulations, eyeing the Postal Service’s financial difficulties, and extending subpoena power to the inspectors general across all the federal agencies. In reality, Issa’s new powers pose great peril to Obama — and to Republicans, too, if they overreach. The GOP will need to pick their battles because the media will play every investigation as an overreach.
Continue reading …They’re a little cranky over on the left today : The bodies aren’t even cold yet in the House, but the Democratic Party has already opened up a bitter debate over who’s to blame. The party’s bloodied moderates Wednesday released two years of pent-up anger at a party leadership they viewed as blind to their needs and deaf to the messages of voters who never asked for President Barack Obama’s ambitious first-term agenda. Liberals pushed back hard: The problem, they say, was those undisciplined moderates, who won delays, unsightly compromises and a muddled message from a too-accommodating administration. Yet a third group of Democratic politicians and operatives blamed not policy but a failed sales job for the party’s woes. One thing all sides agree on: The White House blew it. “It is clear that Democrats over-interpreted our mandate. Talk of a ‘political realignment’ and a ‘new progressive era’ proved wishful thinking,” the retiring Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh wrote in a New York Times op-ed posted online as the scope of last night’s losses became clear. Bayh called the decision to focus on health care in a bad economy “overreach.” “We were too deferential to our most zealous supporters,” he wrote. Mandate? What mandate? Obama won only 53% of the vote and although the Dems had strong majorities in Congress there was no mandate, certainly not for the leftist agenda that Obama wanted to jam down America’s throats. It should have been clear to the Dems that when you have a mandate you don’t have 60%+ of the people yelling STOP! as they did during the Obamacare debate. It was a mandate to quit. This election was a referendum on Obama and on Obamacare. If they hadn’t overreached with nationalized health care they wouldn’t have taken such a beating on Tuesday.
Continue reading …