While Wall Streeters continue to rake it in, there’s a movement afoot to redirect the public’s rage against the humble public employee. These hardworking folks don’t look like the greedy opportunists they’ve been smeared as. Related Entries January 5, 2011 The House of Professors January 4, 2011 Darrell Issa, Step Away From the Corporations
Continue reading …Disgusting. The liberal press went for Boehner’s jugular today at his first press conference since becoming Speaker of the House in a historic wave election. Breitbart TV reported: Of course, this sort of thing never happened just a month ago … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 06/01/2011 21:23 Number of articles : 8
Continue reading …Photo: FaceMePLS , Flickr, CC We knew it was going to happen, and now it has: Republicans have killed the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming. They did so as promised, shortly after taking office. The committee was designed specifically to shape policy on global warming and energy issues. Since its creation in 2006, it held 80 hearings and briefings, according to
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: CBO Today is shaping up as a very bad day for the quixotic GOP effort to repeal the 2010 health care reform law. Even as the number two House Republican Eric Cantor was telling the CBS Early Show that the Affordable Care Act is full of “budget gimmickry” that “costs over $1 trillion,” the Congressional Budget Office was making a liar out of him. As the new CBO analysis revealed, the GOP’s repeal effort wouldn’t merely deny health care coverage to 32 million Americans, over the next decade Republicans would add a staggering $230 billion to the national debt. As ThinkProgress summed up the findings from the CBO , the GOP’s H.R. 2, the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act would not only lead to higher out of pocket costs, reduced benefits and saddle employers with higher premiums. Over the next 10 years and beyond, budget-busting Republicans if successful would unleash a flood of red ink: “Consequently, over the 2012-2021 period, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a result of changes in direct spending and revenues is likely to be an increase in the vicinity of $230 billion, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes to CBO’s and JCT’s projections for that period…” “Correspondingly, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 2 would increase federal deficits in the decade after 2019 by an amount that is in a broad range around one-half percent of GDP, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes that CBO and JCT will include in the forthcoming estimate. For the decade beginning after 2021, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a share of the economy would probably be somewhat larger.” For his part, Rep. Cantor remains unencumbered – and undeterred – by the truth. On Wednesday, Cantor tried to brush off the CBO’s inconvenient truth . “About the budget implications, I think most people understand that the CBO did the job it was asked to do by the then-Democrat majority, and it was really comparing apples to oranges,” Cantor said. “It talked about 10 years’ worth of tax hikes and six years’ worth of benefits. Everyone knows beyond the 10-year window, this bill has the potential to bankrupt this federal government as well as the states.” Today, as CBS reported, he doubled down : Cantor also disputed the claim, put forth by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, that the health care reform bill passed by Congress last year will actually reduce the deficit by $143 billion, calling the figure “budget gimmickry .” “I think what we do know is the health care bill costs over $1 trillion,” Cantor told Hill. “And we know it was full of budget gimmickry. And it spends money we don’t have in this country.” Even before the CBO published its latest report pulling the rug out from under the Republicans’ bogus budget claims, Ezra Klein of the Washington Post responded, “Repealing health-care reform would cost hundreds of billions of dollars — and Eric Cantor knows it.” Republicans are aware that this looks, well, horrible. So they’re trying to explain why their decision to lift the rule requiring fiscal responsibility is actually fiscally responsible… What’s important about Cantor’s argument is not that he’s wrong. It’s why he’s saying something he knows to be wrong. There are plenty of reasons to oppose the health-care reform bill. You might not want to spend that money insuring people, or you might not think the legislation goes far enough in reforming the system. But as a matter of arithmetic, using the math that Congress always uses, the bill saves money. It cuts enough spending and raises enough taxes to more than pay for itself, both in the first 10 years and in the second 10 years. But Cantor and the GOP know full well that the bill is unpopular largely because people think it increases the deficit. Polls have shown that only 15 percent of Americans know that CBO said it will reduce the deficit. If, in the repeal fight, it becomes widely understood that the bill reduces the deficit, it will become more popular. So it’s crucial, as the repeal effort goes forward, for Republicans to become much more brazen in falsely asserting that the bill doesn’t really reduce the deficit, and that even if the CBO does say it reduces the deficit, that they’re saying that because they’ve been tricked somehow. But CBO wasn’t tricked. If it were, Cantor, who has a staff dedicated to figuring these things out, would have a better argument than the one he’s offering. Which is exactly right. As the CBO report makes clear, the Republican repeal campaign is unhealthy for Americans – and the truth. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com Republicans made many promises to their Tea Party base, and as you would expect they have already started backtracking on most of them. One was that amendments would be allowed to be added to bills and Greta Van Susteren was none too happy with Rep. David Dreier last night about it, as she immediately bit down on his neck over the broken promise. She then beat him up over not proposing a bill to repeal health care reform Greta: But you promised. This is what you promised so right out of the box you’re not doing it. Why don’t you do it? — Frankly, I’m not impressed when you make a promise… Greta kept at him for a while and then moved on, but did she and her Tea Party pals really believe all the promises that the GOP made during the run-up to the midterms? Howard Fineman has already reported that Republicans can’t come close to cutting $100 billion out of the budget, as Boehner promised in his idiotic Pledge to America. The GOP “budget cut” numbers are getting squishier by the minute. At least it seemed that way in the hallways of the Capitol on a ceremonial first day of swearing-ins, family photo ops and back-slapping goodwill. Republicans campaigned coast to coast on, among other things, a promise to cut $100 billion out of the federal budget. But now they are talking about cuts as slim as $30 billion, blaming the change on the fine print that no one read — or if they read, did not understand. It turns out the $100-billion figure meant $100 billion from a budget that President Barack Obama proposed, which was never passed. And now that the fiscal year is nearly half over, well, there’s just no way … And then there’s the very nutty Rep. Louis Gohmert from Texas, who stripped out transparency from the rules. BUT – the health care repeal legislation, the first major bill that will move through Congress, will be a closed rule – meaning no one will be able to offer an amendment. When asked about the this contradiction Tuesday night, Boehner said, “it’s not like we haven’t litigated this for years.” And, finally, the initial rules package that House Republicans will pass Wednesday had a provision to make committee attendance public. But the House GOP conference voted last night to strip that out (a move by Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas). The goal had been transparency – who is at these hearings? But making that public will no longer be a requirement. The reason? Some GOP lawmakers say they were concerned about getting slammed for missing hearings when they may have extenuating circumstances, like a death in the family. I do hope right-wing pundits continue to hold the GOP accountable for their promises. I imagine if they are too hard on them, though, then another Fox News memo will come down from Bill Sammon telling them to tone it down .
Continue reading …And on the second day of Republican rule, the House reads the Constitution. Volunteers have started giving voice to the seven articles and 27 amendments that make up the nation’s governing document. (Jan. 6)
Continue reading …NBC's Meredith Vieira seemed baffled by the concept of taking a principled stand against Obamacare, as she repeatedly pressed Michele Bachmann, on Thursday's Today show, why Republicans would bother to vote to repeal the health care bill in the House if it wasn't going to get passed in the Senate or signed by the President? Vieira's very first question to the Republican Minnesota Congresswoman set the aggressive tone for the entire interview as she demanded: “Given the fact that the Democratic-led Senate will never go for that and the President has veto power, why make that the first big thing on your plate?” For her part Bachmann attempted to explain to the Today co-anchor that health care was “the issue that people really reacted against” in the midterms and “were very upset that very few members even bothered to read the health care bill.” However Vieira found that to be an insufficient response as she rebutted: “But if you have no chance to repeal it, why go through this exercise?” (video after the jump) read more
Continue reading …Young Hollywood stars — from Ashley Tisdale to Neil Patrick Harris — talk about getting ready things like the People’s Choice Awards. (Jan. 6)
Continue reading …Open and Closed shots of the Homeostatic Facade System from inside a building. Photo credit Decker Yeadon A property developer who was building a 9 Star energy efficient house once confided in me, that much of that efficiency would be squandered if the house was inhabited by a 1 Star resident. And that’s one of the conundrums with passive solar design. It works best when people interact with the building’s non-mechanical heating and cooling systems. But Decker Yeadon, architectural material technologists, envisage … Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …