Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 215)

As the House prepares to consider a repeal of health care reform, the Obama administration has released a startling statistic: Up to 129 million non-elderly Americans have pre-existing health conditions. That means anywhere from one-fifth to one-half of people under age 65 in the US are at risk of being…

Continue reading …

Hu Jintao arrives in Washington today, and President Obama will be rolling out the red carpet in public, even as the gloves come off in private. The Chinese president will have two dinners with Obama—one an intimate affair tonight, followed by a lavish state dinner tomorrow—and a State…

Continue reading …
Health Care Repeal Debate Starts Tuesday

Postponed because of the Tucson shootings, House Republicans are set to resume their bid to repeal the health care reform law Tuesday. (Jan. 18)

Continue reading …

Gabrielle Giffords may yet pull off a miraculous recovery , but a peculiarity of Arizona law might cost her the House seat she holds anyway, the Washington Post reports. An Arizona statute mandates that a public office be declared vacant if the officeholder ceases to “discharge the duties of office for…

Continue reading …

Yesterday (covered here at NewsBusters ; at BizzyBlog ), in his report on the arrest of Eric Fuller at an ABC “This Week” taping in Tucson, Arizona, the Associated Press's Bob Christie either failed to perform a basic web search that would have revealed Fuller's Friday “Democracy Now!” rant, or failed to report what he found. This evening's AP report from Christie and Amanda Lee Myers at least recognizes Fuller's appearance on the far-left program. But that acknowledgment appears at Paragraph 14 of a report that is primarily about Gabrielle Giffords's recovery (headlined “Rep. Gabrielle Giffords condition improves”), instead of in a different AP dispatch this evening (“With shock subsiding, pain sets in for AZ victims”) where addressing Fuller's outburst would have made more sense (what would have made the most sense is a separate report on Fuller alone). The submission by Christie and Myers also fails to go into much of the substance of Fuller's “Democracy Now!” appearance. Readers get the impression that Fuller was fulminating against conservatives in general, when in fact he called out several by name — including, bizarrely, new House Majority Leader John Boehner. Here are the relevant paragraphs from Christie's and Myers's mishmash : Meanwhile, a week after the Tucson supermarket massacre, more details emerged about one of shooting victims who police said became distraught and was arrested during a televised town hall meeting.

Continue reading …
Tom Coburn: The ‘Bond Vigilantes’ Are More Dangerous Than Not Raising Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media Why do Republicans insist on using this sort of language when trying to scare the crap out of everyone about a problem they created? “Bond vigilantes” Tom Coburn… really? This is nothing but an excuse to starve the beast and get rid of every social program that Republicans have hated for decades now. Rather than raise taxes on the rich, they’ll use this as an excuse to go after Social Security or other programs that help ordinary working people. Chuck Schumer laid out pretty plainly the dangers of not raising the debt ceiling this spring. He also talked about Eric Cantor admitting that it was going to have to be done. So if the Democrats give in to the Republicans on this, I agree with what Dibgy wrote the other day, it’s because they want to and not because they have to. GREGORY: All right, final question here about– what Eric Cantor in the House, a Republican leader, called a “leverage moment” for the Republicans on the debt ceiling. SCHUMER: Yeah. GREGORY: It has to be raised. We have to keep borrowing money, even though we’re so deep in debt. Republicans, Senator Schumer, to exact a promise on a certain amount of spending cuts before they vote to raise that ceiling. Do you think that agreement can be reached? SCHUMER: Well first, I think using the threat of not renewing the debt ceiling is like playing with fire. If we didn’t renew the debt ceiling, our soldiers and veterans wouldn’t be paid, Social Security checks wouldn’t go out, and worst of all, we might permanently threaten confidence– of the credit markets and the dollar, which could create a recession worse than the one we have now, or even a depression. So that is playing with fire. And I was glad to see that both Speaker Boehner and Eric Cantor said they’re not gonna use that as a threat. We have– are gonna have to come together on spending. There is no question about it. And we Democrats agree there oughta be spending cuts. And the appropriation that came up last year– late last year, the McCaskill-Sessions Proposal, bipartisan, to cut spending considerably lower– than was originally proposed in the budget– GREGORY: Right. SCHUMER: –was supported. But you can’t just do it willy nilly across the board. There are some things that changed since 2008 and need to be funded. GREGORY: Senator Coburn, does it have to be a specific amount– in cuts before you vote to raise the ceiling? COBURN: I think for me it does. I’ve had conversations with the President. Look– the debt ceiling, we had warnings last week from the rating agencies that we’re gonna get a downgrade in our bonds. A debt ceiling non-increase– is nothing compared to what’s gonna happen to us if we don’t address the real issues facing our country. The CBS poll out this morning, 77 percent of the people in this country believe we need to cut the spending significantly. Only nine percent– say we need to raise taxes. The fact is, is I believe the President and the– bipartisan majority in both houses know that we can come together before the debt ceiling and– reach an agreement that says, “Here’s where we’re gonna be and– here’s what we must do to send the signal to the international financial community.” If, in fact, we don’t raise the debt ceiling, that won’t be near the catastrophe that, if, in fact, the– the– the bond vigilantes come after the U.S. government bonds in the next two to three years– COBURN: –we will have such bigger pain than not raising the debt limit. GREGORY: I will let– make that the last word. Senators, thank you both very much.

Continue reading …
On Debt Ceiling and Health Care, GOP Is Just Fine with Uncertainty

enlarge Credit: Perrspectives For years, Republicans have deployed the word ” uncertainty ” to stymie any public policy with which they disagreed. A decade after President Bush declared “scientific uncertainties remain” about global warming , virtually the entire Congressional Republican caucus has proudly joined the deniers’ camp . Last month, GOP leaders revved up the uncertainty myth over taxes , falsely claiming that another tax cut windfall for the wealth was needed to “reduce the uncertainty that’s affecting employers all across our country.” Of course, on two of the most heated issues of the day – raising the U.S. debt ceiling and repealing the 2010 health care reform law – it is the GOP which is wholly responsible for creating real uncertainty for businesses, investors and all Americans. Next week , House Republicans will bring their quixotic effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act to the floor. (The vote originally scheduled for this Wednesday was delayed. That was altogether fitting, as Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords received death threats and saw her office vandalized after her March 2010 vote for health care reform.) But whether they target the entire ACA or just individual provisions, Republicans are bringing only uncertainty – and not health care – to the American people. As Politico detailed yesterday (“Investors See Health Law’s Potential”), insurers themselves are agreed on that point: As Republicans push forward on repealing health reform, planning the law’s demise, a different conversation is happening among thousands of health care investors gathered in San Francisco for this week’s J.P Morgan Health Care Conference: how to capitalize on health reform’s new business opportunities. The Congressional Budget Office estimates 32 million Americans will gain health insurance by 2019 if the law stands. For health insurers, that represents a potential boon for both their individual market business as well as in the Medicaid market, where states regularly contract with private insurers to manage care. “The worst is behind them,” says Ipsita Smolinski, president of Capitol Street and senior advisor to McKenna Long & Aldridge, of the outlook for health insurers. “There was so much uncertainty last year. But with the MLR and rate review regulations out, investors know they have a pretty viable future. And it is the GOP’s threatened repeal effort, and not an influx of 32 million new subscribers, which is creating uncertainty among insurers: Health insurers spent barely anytime discussing Republicans’ repeal efforts. Aetna’s Zubretsky touched on the subject briefly only to say that Republicans understand that a rifle shot approach to tearing out specific health reform provisions, particularly the individual mandate, would not bode well for their business. “The unintended consequence of repealing and replacing part of the legislation is the biggest risk here,” he said. Of course, the risks for the American people are much greater still. Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that the GOP’s H.R. 2, the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, would not only lead to higher out of pocket costs, reduced benefits and saddle employers with higher premiums, but over the next 10 years would add $230 billion to the deficit. On Friday, Harvard economist David Cutler released a paper estimating that that repealing the health law could destroy 250,000 to 400,000 jobs annually over the next decade. And, as the Los Angeles Times reported, major insurers are reporting that thanks to the incentives in the Affordable Care Act, “a growing number of small businesses are signing up to give their workers health benefits.” But Republican bluster over health care pales in comparison to the potentially fatal effects of their refusal to increase the United States debt ceiling . On Friday, Greg Ip and Felix Salmon contended that failure to do so wouldn’t necessarily mean the U.S. couldn’t pay off its debts and so trigger a global economic meltdown. But as former McCain economic advisor Mark Zandi warned: “If we get into a heated, protracted debate over the debt ceiling, global investors are going to grow nervous, and start driving up interest rates. It will all become negatively self-re-enforcing. No good will come of it.” And last week, Obama economic advisor Austan Goolsbee wanted to be sure the American people understood the implications and causes of the GOP’s dangerously hypocritical game of chicken on the national debt: “This is not a game. You know, the debt ceiling is not something to toy with. … If we hit the debt ceiling, that’s essentially defaulting on our obligations, which is totally unprecedented in American history. The impact on the economy would be catastrophic. I mean, that would be a worse financial economic crisis than anything we saw in 2008… If we get to the point where you’ve damaged the full faith and credit of the United States, that would be the first default in history caused purely by insanity.” But that’s a game of chicken Republicans remain determined to play. And while Ron Paul said of shutting down the government “I don’t think it would hurt one bit,” Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) admitted, “I don’t know” what will happen if the debt ceiling isn’t raised. Senator Lindsey Graham , who like Rand Paul , plans to holds the debt ceiling hostage in exchange for still-unspecified spending cuts , painted a grim picture of what would ensue: “Let me tell you what’s involved if we don’t lift the debt ceiling: financial collapse and calamity throughout the world. That’s not lost upon me. But we’ve done this 93 times. And if we keep doing the same old thing, then that is insanity to the nth degree.” No, it’s hypocritical. Because as the data show, Senate Republicans voted seven times to increase the debt ceiling under George W. Bush . They only withdrew their support when Democrat Barack Obama entered the White House. ( Donny Shaw at OpenCongress has the details.) Sadly, the American people seem to be buying the GOP’s snake oil, with a recent poll showing 71% oppose raising the debt ceiling. But rating agencies including Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s are not, warning Thursday that their AAA ratings for the United States were at risk. The final irony of the uncertainty machine that is the Republican Party is that the GOP played that same card just weeks ago in the run-up to the lame duck deal on extending the Bush tax cuts for two years. Of course, they are predictably silent about the 1980′s, when Ronald Reagan upended the tax code four times in five years, including “the biggest tax increase ever enacted during peacetime.” And despite conservative warnings then as now about “job-killing tax hikes,” American businesses responded by adding 23 million jobs after President Clinton raised upper-income tax rates in 1993. As ThinkProgress concluded last month, the GOP’s supposed concern over uncertainty was all a charade: Of course, when it came to tax cuts, Obama’s plan for permanent extension of the middle-class tax cuts and expiration of those cuts for the richest two percent of Americans would have provided certainty. But the GOP was so desperate to extend tax cuts for the rich that “certainty” was thrown under the bus. As Weigel put it, “By Boehner’s own standard, this compromise doesn’t reduce uncertainty, which during the election and after the election really became the key Republican argument for keeping the rates.” Jonathan Chait added, “For those still clinging to any naive notion that Republicans meant this as anything more than a slogan, the answer is now clear. [Republicans] want low tax rates for the rich. They don’t care about certainty”: Republicans had a choice. They could accede to certainty with Clinton-era rates on the rich, or uncertainty with Bush-era rates on the rich. They chose uncertainty. The Bush-era rates will live on for two years, after which nobody knows if they’ll be extended or not. Only when another Treasury-draining windfall for the wealthy was in jeopardy did Republicans fret about uncertainty they couldn’t live with. As for the health of the American people and the economy, that’s another matter altogether. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …
Anderson Cooper Trashes Think Progress by Comparing Their Site to Michelle Malkin’s

Click here to view this media Anderson Cooper and his producers apparently think that something mentioned in a post by the liberal web site Think Progress that was not the main topic of the post that they took issue with somehow is equal to what hatemonger Michelle Malkin does day in and day out on her blog, and these two websites somehow are equal in spreading misinformation to the public. All I can say after watching this is: Shame on Anderson Cooper and his producers, and shame on the supposed liberal on the panel, Maria Cardona, for letting this pass without defending the work that Think Progress has done week after week on their site. Here is the post that was being criticized by Cooper — Gohmert Warns Of ‘Reverting’ To Era Of Congressional Duels — While Pushing Bill To Arm Congressmen . The main substance of that post was that it is pretty well insane for Gohmert to be pushing for handguns to be allowed on the House floor. They mentioned that his argument that there was a handgun ban in DC was not true. Here’s Cooper’s criticism of that. COOPER: Well, the liberal blog ThinkProgress jumped all over Gohmert’s idea, mocking it, calling it — quote — “harebrained.” Their main point was this, though. “Gohmert” — and I’m quoting — “Gohmert explained the need for his bill by falsely claiming that Washington, D.C., has a gun ban. The Roberts Supreme Court did away with D.C.’s handgun ban in 2008.” Well, there’s only one problem with that statement. It’s wrong. Even after that Supreme Court decision, ordinary citizens cannot carry a registered — registered handgun in D.C. You can keep a handgun in your home if you have a permit, but you can’t carry one. Now, you can say what you want about Louie Gohmert’s idea of lawmakers carrying guns in and around the Capitol, but you should criticize it based on actual facts, not made-up ones, which is just what ThinkProgress did. So what part of not being able to carry a gun outside of your home did Cooper not realize was still banned? You know, the one that would mean you also can’t carry one into the halls of Congress. Jebus these people make my head hurt. This just looks like an excuse to me for CNN to play the “all sides are equally bad” game and take a shot at Think Progress. Those folks actually have one of the few liberal think tanks out there behind the research they’re doing, unlike Malkin, who just makes crap up to be outraged about. And one last note here: If Think Progress does end up thinking they made a mistake in their reporting, we’re likely to get a retraction from them. You’re never going to see that from the likes of Michelle Malkin. In the meantime, we get to hear more of the “all sides do it” bulls**t from the Villagers who would not recognize an honest conservation about anything if it bit them on the nose. Transcript below the fold via CNN . COOPER: We begin “Keeping Them Honest” with politicians and pundits playing politics with the tragedy in Tucson. There are cringe-worthy examples on both the left and right. We showed you fund-raising letters that went out earlier in the week. At the memorial service in Tucson on Wednesday, President Obama implored politicians and the whole nation really to tone it down, to honor those who lost their lives by stepping up the civility. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: And if, as has been discussed in recent days, their death helps usher in more civility in our public discourse, let us remember it is not because a simple lack of civility caused this tragedy — it did not — but rather because only a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to the challenges of our nation in a way that would make them proud. (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE) (END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Well, from pundits and politicians from both sides of the aisle, there has been and continues to be a lot of finger- pointing. Some on each side are claiming they hold the exclusive deed on the high road, accusing the other side of playing politics. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, “THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW”) RUSH LIMBAUGH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He’s sitting there in jail. He knows what’s going on. He knows that a Democrat Party, the Democrat Party, is attempting to find anybody but him to blame. He knows, if he plays his cards right, he’s just a victim. (END AUDIO CLIP) (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, “THE HUCKABEE REPORT”) MIKE HUCKABEE (R), FORMER ARKANSAS GOVERNOR: Meanwhile, a lot of people in politics and the media covered themselves in shame by rushing to judgment about the alleged shooter, Jared Lee Loughner. The same people who were so quick to falsely blame the Tea Party for the bomb planted in Times Square apparently learned nothing from that mistake. (END AUDIO CLIP) (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, FOX NEWS CHANNEL) BERNARD GOLDBERG, AUTHOR, “100 PEOPLE WHO ARE SCREWING UP AMERICA”: Well, in all my years as a working journalist, I have never seen such shallow, thoughtless, agenda-driven dribble as I have in the past 36 hours. And it’s all masquerading as serious analysis and commentary. (END VIDEO CLIP) (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: Now, many observers have already reduced this tragedy to simple questions of whether overheated rhetoric is to blame or one partisan group or another. (END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Well, a lot of it is just finger-pointing about finger- pointing. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but, recently, we have noticed a few people or groups who think they’re entitled to their own facts. Two examples tonight, first, a liberal blog called ThinkProgress attacking a Republican congressman based on something that’s simply not true. The congressman is Louie Gohmert from Texas. And he wants members of Congress to be allowed to carry guns inside the Capitol Building, even on the House floor. He explained his reasoning in an interview with WorldNetDaily’s Radio America. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, RADIO AMERICA) REP. LOUIE GOHMERT (R), TEXAS: And up here in Washington, D.C., because there’s a gun ban, beside law enforcement, the only people that have guns here are the criminals. So, we’re looking at a bill that would allow members of Congress to carry a weapon. (END AUDIO CLIP) COOPER: Well, the liberal blog ThinkProgress jumped all over Gohmert’s idea, mocking it, calling it — quote — “harebrained.” Their main point was this, though. “Gohmert” — and I’m quoting — “Gohmert explained the need for his bill by falsely claiming that Washington, D.C., has a gun ban. The Roberts Supreme Court did away with D.C.’s handgun ban in 2008.” Well, there’s only one problem with that statement. It’s wrong. Even after that Supreme Court decision, ordinary citizens cannot carry a registered — registered handgun in D.C. You can keep a handgun in your home if you have a permit, but you can’t carry one. Now, you can say what you want about Louie Gohmert’s idea of lawmakers carrying guns in and around the Capitol, but you should criticize it based on actual facts, not made-up ones, which is just what ThinkProgress did. On the right, conservative blogger Michelle Malkin has been pushing a story that seems to have no basis in fact. She says the color scheme at the Tucson memorial was some sort of a political conspiracy. She has a diatribe on her blog about what she called the branding of the Tucson massacre. She wrote that the White House was behind the “Together we thrive” theme at Wednesday’s memorial, and she didn’t like the sea of blue on the signs and the T-shirts. Malkin wrote — quote — “Will there — will there be giant foam fingers and blue cotton candy, too? Can’t the Democrat political stage give it a break just once?” But here’s the problem with that. According to the University of Arizona, the White House had nothing to do with the logo or the T- shirts. The university says it was behind — it was behind the branding. The shirts, they say, were designed by a student, and the university paid for them. On her blog, Malkin backtracked, but only kind of, writing, “Given U-of-A president Robert Shelton’s embarrassing, thinly-veiled partisan cheerleading for Obama tonight, it may indeed be a 100 percent campus-initiated campaign. Given the Obama campaign — given the Obama White House’s meticulous attention to stage prop details, however, I would say the odds of involvement by Axelrod, Plouffe and others are high,” regarding two Obama advisers, David Axelrod and David Plouffe. Now, no facts to back it up, and facts matter, the truth matters, maybe even more than ever right now. Joining me now, senior political analyst David Gergen, political analyst and Republican strategist Ed Rollins, and Democratic strategist Maria Cardona. Ed, if the finger-pointing and the deliberate misinformation isn’t going to stop now, in the wake of a tragedy like this, I mean, is there ever hope of it stopping at all? ED ROLLINS, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTOR: I wish it would. I wish the tone would go down. I mean, the bottom line is, the Republicans now have the votes and they can be in the meetings and may — can make their cases, and obviously pass out things out of the House. They don’t need to be yelling and screaming back and forth. And equally as important, the Democrats don’t have to be yelling back and forth. I think a lot of it is the blogs, a lot of it is talk radio, a lot of it is cable shows. I think the key thing here is, can members of Congress sit down and come to some compromise on some very significant issues? I’m — I’m doubtful of that. The — there’s such distance between the various programs, you know, the key thing here is, can you fiscally balance budgets or push towards balancing budgets, eliminate programs, you know, add some revenue, without killing each other? COOPER: It is interesting, Maria. I mean, it seems so juvenile, basically, both sides saying, no, you started it; you started it. MARIA CARDONA, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Oh, absolutely, Anderson. I think the whole thing is just nonsense on both sides. And I don’t think either side does itself any favors when it goes either on the blogs or on TV or on Web sites, and tries to accuse the other side, without having any facts to back it up. It demeans all of us, and it demeans the political discourse. And it doesn’t get us to where we need to be, to President Obama’s point. We have huge problems that we need to try to solve. So, I do think it’s incumbent — incumbent upon our leaders to give the example to all of us that we can live up to, but it’s also incumbent upon all of us, on you, Anderson, on you, Ed, on myself, everybody who is part of this political discourse, to try to take it down a notch and make sure that what you’re saying is either fact-based, and just focus on ideas, and don’t do it personally. COOPER: David, you think things have actually gotten better this week? DAVID GERGEN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, Anderson, I’m more hopeful. And let me acknowledge up front I thought the president’s speech Wednesday night was successful, but it clearly was even more successful than I imagined. I think he resonated with much of the country, to his credit. And I think he poured water on a lot of the flames that were out there, that there are still some fires burning. We have some outliers, are the ones — the ones you have cited tonight, and it’s good to keep them accountable, to keep the focus on them. But I — I think, next week, for example, as the Republicans in the House of Representatives debate the health care bill, my expectation is, their arguments will be more tempered than they would have been otherwise. I think there will be less demonization. Sure, they are going to disagree with the health care bill. That’s what they ran on. But I think they will do it in a more tempered way. And I do think the president has opened the way now to a new conversation that he can continue in his State of the Union, in — in ways that can bring people together, perhaps institutionalize more bipartisanship, more bipartisan meetings, meetings at Camp David and the like, and actually do more shaming, as — as your show is doing tonight, shame those people who are the outliers, so that they get off this, and we — and we put more of the flames out. COOPER: Ed, do you think that’s true, A., that the president will try to do that in the State of the Union, and that next week’s debate on health care will kind of reflect some sort of a change? ROLLINS: I think the president gave a superb speech. And I think he lifted it to a higher, higher plane. You know, I mean, he was very partisan in the course of the campaign, more so than most presidents. But, you know, go back to a president David and I both worked for, Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan — there’s this great myth that Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill sat down and had a beer every night on the South Lawn and resolved things. It was a very partisan period of time, too, but there was a gentle tone. And the American public saw a couple of congenial Irish guys that weren’t yelling and screaming at each other, even though, behind the scenes, it was tough. Equally as important, there was more of a social life in Washington. A Bob Michel could go play golf with a Tip O’Neill. They were friends. They weren’t — they weren’t enemies. They could fight on issues. Danny Rostenkowski, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, would sit down and work out with David Stockman on the budgets. Today there’s no social life, and so, to a certain extent, in the last 10, 15 years, it’s gotten more and more partisan on both sides. They don’t know each other. COOPER: Hmm. ROLLINS: So, all that they’re doing is dealing with rhetoric. And you need to eliminate — where I’m hopeful is that the members of Congress and the Senate, which is really where it matters, speak with a softer tone and fight for — hard for their issues, but speak with a softer tone. COOPER: It’s hard, though, Maria, after the last campaign that we have seen, the last election, you know, a lot of folks getting elected with very tough tone. CARDONA: I think that’s exactly right. And I think the other thing that is a reality today, Anderson, that wasn’t even 10 — or maybe even five years ago is that we have a 24/7 news cycle that is full of bloggers, is full of tweeters, is full of Facebookers, that can actually ignite and — and put more gasoline on the fire than otherwise would have been the case in a normal daily political debate of 10 years ago. COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: So I think that has really changed this. And I think what we all need to realize, including these bloggers, including anybody who put a post — a post up on Facebook, is that you’re not just talking to your friend, you’re not just talking to your neighbor. You are now talking to America. And your words can matter, and your words can influence. COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: That’s what we all have to realize, which I don’t think we have realized to this point. COOPER: David? GERGEN: Anderson, I do want to express one sense of disappointment. And that is, the deeper problem with this shooting has been the culture of violence in this country. We have too much hate, too many guns, too many killings. You know, the United States has 20 times as many killings by guns as other developed countries. And, among teenagers, people, we — we have over 40 times as many killings by guns. And there has been a reluctance on both sides to face up to the gun culture and the violence and what this is all about. And that is a disappointment. It’s going to take a long time to get there, clearly. COOPER: Obviously, it’s a — it’s a hot issue. A lot of people disagree with you, David, who simply don’t think… GERGEN: Sure do. COOPER: … that guns are the problem, as we have… CARDONA: Anderson, can I just… COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: Can I just finish this one thing? First of all, I completely agree with David 100 percent. But, secondly, you know, I’m raising two kindergarten-age children. And it just seems to me, especially in these last couple of days, it is so simple to just go back and — and look at what we all learned in kindergarten, the golden rule. Let’s treat each other how we would like for them to treat us. I know it sounds simple, but, clearly, you know, a lot of the — the solutions to the hardest problems are the simple ones. We should all go back and take a look at that and live it in our everyday lives. COOPER: Maria Cardona, appreciate you being on. Ed Rollins, David Gergen, thank you.

Continue reading …
‘Left, Right & Center’: After Arizona

With last week’s shocking shooting in Tuscon as the backdrop for this week’s edition of “Left, Right & Center,” show regulars Robert Scheer, Tony Blankley, Arianna Huffington and Matt Miller discuss gun control, the plight of the social outcast … Related Entries January 13, 2011 Obama and Palin Speeches Compared January 13, 2011 White House Mum on Palin’s Latest Words

Continue reading …
President Reportedly Flees Tunisia

The Tunisian government is in upheaval after weeks of violent protests over high unemployment and skyrocketing food prices. Al-Jazeera reported that the prime minister had taken the reins of government after President Ben Ali left the country. —JCL Al-Jazeera English: Tunisia’s long-standing president has left the country amid violent protests and the prime minister has taken over control of the government. “Since the president [Zine El Abidine Ben Ali] is temporarily unable to exercise his duties, it has been decided that the prime minister will exercise temporarily the [presidential] duties,” Mohammed Ghannouchi, the Tunisian prime minister, said on state television. Ghannouchi is now the interim president. He cited chapter 56 of the Tunisian constitution as the article by which he was assuming power. Maltese air traffic controllers have told Al Jazeera that Ben Ali is bound for Paris, though the Maltese government has denied any knowledge of Ben Ali’s plane having stopped in Malta after having left Tunis. Read more Related Entries January 13, 2011 White House Mum on Palin’s Latest Words January 13, 2011 WikiLeaks Exposes the Danger of Pakistan’s Nukes

Continue reading …